Does mandatory inpatient alcohol detoxification reduce emergency department recidivism, hospital admissions, and emergency medical services transports for patients with chronic, severe alcohol dependence?

A mixed-method outcome evaluation of a specialist Alcohol Hospital Liaison Team

AIMS

To evaluate the effectiveness of an Alcohol Hospital Liaison Team at reducing alcohol-specific hospital attendances and admissions.

METHODS

In a mixed-method evaluation, 96 patients who accessed the team were monitored using data for alcohol-specific hospital attendances and Accident and Emergency (A&E) admissions before, during, and after engaging with the team. A feedback survey was sent to patients and a focus group was held with staff from the team to identify barriers and facilitators to the successful delivery of this service.

RESULTS

No differences were observed when looking at alcohol admissions or A&E attendances before patients engaged with the service to those after discharge. While hospital admissions decreased slightly and A&E attendances increased slightly, these differences were not significant. Hospital admissions and A&E attendances increased significantly during engagement with the service. The focus group identified confusion over who should be delivering brief interventions and that the team was holding onto patients for too long.

CONCLUSION

The results of this evaluation demonstrated that this team was not effective at reducing alcohol attendances or admissions due to a number of factors. Policy makers should make note of the barriers to effectiveness highlighted in this article, before commissioning alcohol care teams in the future.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Care Plan Alerts and Resource Utilization by High Frequency Emergency Department Users with Opioid Use Disorder

Introduction

There is a paucity of literature supporting the use of electronic alerts for patients with high frequency emergency department (ED) use. We sought to measure changes in opioid prescribing and administration practices, total charges and other resource utilization using electronic alerts to notify providers of an opioid-use care plan for high frequency ED patients.

Methods

This was a randomized, non-blinded, two-group parallel design study of patients who had 1) opioid use disorder and 2) high frequency ED use. Three affiliated hospitals with identical electronic health records participated. Patients were randomized into “Care Plan” versus “Usual Care groups”. Between the years before and after randomization, we compared as primary outcomes the following: 1) opioids (morphine mg equivalents) prescribed to patients upon discharge and administered to ED and inpatients; 2) total medical charges, and the numbers of; 3) ED visits, 4) ED visits with advanced radiologic imaging (computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) studies, and 5) inpatient admissions.

Results

A total of 40 patients were enrolled. For ED and inpatients in the “Usual Care” group, the proportion of morphine mg equivalents received in the post-period compared with the pre-period was 15.7%, while in the “Care Plan” group the proportion received in the post-period compared with the pre-period was 4.5% (ratio=0.29, 95% CI [0.07–1.12]; p=0.07). For discharged patients in the “Usual Care” group, the proportion of morphine mg equivalents prescribed in the post-period compared with the pre-period was 25.7% while in the “Care Plan” group, the proportion prescribed in the post-period compared to the pre-period was 2.9%. The “Care Plan” group showed an 89% greater proportional change over the periods compared with the “Usual Care” group (ratio=0.11, 95% CI [0.01–0.092]; p=0.04). Care plans did not change the total charges, or, the numbers of ED visits, ED visits with CT or MRI or inpatient admissions.

Conclusion

Electronic care plans were associated with an incremental decrease in opioids (in morphine mg equivalents) prescribed to patients with opioid use disorder and high frequency ED use.

Treatment Resistant and Resistant to Treatment? Evaluation of 40 Alcohol Dependent Patients Admitted for Involuntary Treatment

AIMS

To describe the clinical outcomes for a group of patients with severe alcohol dependence discharged from an Involuntary Drug and Alcohol Treatment (IDAT) program.

METHODS

Forty patients admitted to an inpatient IDAT program were prospectively followed up over 6 months using standardized questionnaires.

RESULTS

Patients had high rates of mental health comorbidities (97.5%), cortical atrophy (40%) and socioeconomic disadvantage (92.5% were beneficiaries). Six months after discharge, 25% of patients were abstinent and living in the community and 17.5% had notably reduced alcohol use. A further 7.5% were abstinent due to involuntary hospitalization. A total of 10% of patients were deceased and 40% of patients had relapsed or were lost to follow-up. Number of admissions and admission days reduced by 51 and 45% respectively for the 17 abstinent or improved community-based patients. A total of 82% of this patient group were actively engaged with an Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) team.

CONCLUSIONS

While patient numbers are small, treatment responsiveness was evident for 42.5% of patients, most of whom were followed up with ACT. Evaluation with a comparator group is required to determine whether outcomes are a function of involuntary treatment or an assertive treatment approach.