Access to Care and Depression among Emergency Department Patients

Intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among emergency department patients: results from a randomised pilot study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Emergency departments (ED) represent a promising setting to address preventive health measures like CRC screening.

OBJECTIVES

The current study adapted an existing cervical cancer screening intervention for use in catalysing CRC screening. We evaluated feasibility of identification, provided preliminary effect size estimates and documented participant acceptability.

METHODS

This study was funded by the University of Rochester (ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT05004376). We enrolled ED patients, 45-75 years old, in the Greater Rochester, NY region into a randomised controlled pilot from January to May 2022. Patients were excluded if non-English speaking, lacking a cell phone or had a history of CRC, colorectal resection, inflammatory bowel disease or abdominal radiation. Participants were surveyed to determine adherence with recommended CRC screening guidelines. Patients found non-adherent were randomised to receive (1) recommendation for CRC screening only or (2) recommendation and a text-based intervention aimed at generating intention and motivation to get screened. Patients were blind to allocation at enrolment. The primary outcome was patient CRC screening or scheduling.

RESULTS

1438 patients were approached, with 609 found ineligible, 576 declining participation and 253 enrolled. A randomised sample of 114 non-adherent patients were split evenly between the control and intervention arms. Among participants with follow-up data (n control=38, n intervention=36), intervention participants had a 2%-3% higher rate of scheduling or receiving screening (7%-27% relative improvement). When using the complete sample (n=114) and conservatively assuming no screening for those lost to follow-up, differences in screening across arms were mildly decreased (0%-2% absolute difference). Acceptability of CRC intervention was high, and participants offered formative feedback.

CONCLUSION

The piloted text message intervention through the ED shows potential promise for catalysing CRC screening. Subsequent replication in a fully powered trial is needed.

Clinic-Based Characterization of Adolescents and Young Adults With Migraine: Psychological Functioning, Headache Days, and Disability

Background and Objectives

This cross-sectional observational study retrospectively examined clinical data collected from adolescents and young adults (AYAs) seeking care in a specialty headache clinic. We characterized participants' headache characteristics and psychological functioning and examined the association between self-reported anxiety and depressive symptoms and headache frequency, severity, and disability.

Methods

During their clinic visit, AYAs (M age = 18.36; range = 14-32, 79.5% female) completed an intake questionnaire and reported about their headache characteristics (i.e., frequency, severity, and duration of symptoms in months), mental health history (i.e., previous diagnosis of an anxiety or depressive disorder), and utilization of emergency department (ED) services for migraine. AYAs also completed psychometrically validated screening tools for anxiety and depressive symptoms (i.e., the GAD-7 and PHQ-9). We computed descriptive statistics and examined associations among scores on psychological measures and headache characteristics, including migraine-related disability. We also tested whether individuals with clinically elevated GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores had higher levels of disability relative to those with fewer/subclinical levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms.

Results

Participants (N = 283) reported more than 19 headache days per month on average, with more than 90% describing their average headache intensity as moderate or severe. Nearly half of AYAs reported severe headache-related disability. Approximately one-quarter of AYAs reported a previous diagnosis anxiety or depressive disorder diagnosis, and more than one-third scored above clinical cutoffs on the PHQ-9 and GAD-7. Higher scores on both psychological screening instruments were associated with greater headache frequency. More than 10% of patients endorsed current suicidal ideation; this was not related to headache-related disability. Participants reported a high degree of ED utilization for headache; these rates were unrelated to endorsement of psychological comorbidities.

Discussion

In this sample of AYAs, headache characteristics were generally unrelated to scores on measures on psychological functioning. However, the observed rates of clinically elevated anxiety/depressive symptoms and suicidality in this sample of AYAs underscore the importance of screening for psychological comorbidities in neurology clinics that serve this age group, irrespective of self-reported disability. Results also emphasize the need to expand access to behavioral health services for AYAs with headache disorders and the importance of incorporating a biopsychosocial perspective to the transition of health care from pediatrics to adult neurology practice.

Guidelines for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department 2 (GRACE-2): Low-risk, recurrent abdominal pain in the emergency department

This second Guideline for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE-2) from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine is on the topic "low-risk, recurrent abdominal pain in the emergency department." The multidisciplinary guideline panel applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations regarding four priority questions for adult emergency department patients with low-risk, recurrent, undifferentiated abdominal pain. The intended population includes adults with multiple similar presentations of abdominal signs and symptoms recurring over a period of months or years. The panel reached the following recommendations: (1) if a prior negative computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) has been performed within 12 months, there is insufficient evidence to accurately identify populations in whom repeat CTAP imaging can be safely avoided or routinely recommended; (2) if CTAP with IV contrast is negative, we suggest against ultrasound unless there is concern for pelvic or biliary pathology; (3) we suggest that screening for depression and/or anxiety may be performed during the ED evaluation; and (4) we suggest an opioid-minimizing strategy for pain control. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The GRACE-2 writing group developed clinically relevant questions to address the care of adult patients with low-risk, recurrent, previously undifferentiated abdominal pain in the emergency department (ED). Four patient-intervention-comparison-outcome-time (PICOT) questions were developed by consensus of the writing group, who performed a systematic review of the literature and then synthesized direct and indirect evidence to formulate recommendations, following GRADE methodology. The writing group found that despite the commonality and relevance of these questions in emergency care, the quantity and quality of evidence were very limited, and even fundamental definitions of the population and outcomes of interest are lacking. Future research opportunities include developing precise and clinically relevant definitions of low-risk, recurrent, undifferentiated abdominal pain and determining the scope of the existing populations in terms of annual national ED visits for this complaint, costs of care, and patient and provider preferences.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on emergency psychiatry-Millcreek community hospital, Erie, PA

OBJECTIVE

Evidence suggested that traumatic events, including pandemics, can be associated with psychiatric symptoms like increased anxiety and depression. However, there were many unknowns concerning the emergent global coronavirus-19 (COVID-19), including its impact on psychiatric health within the United States. Our study aimed to track trends of mental health problems in individuals who presented with psychiatric complaints in an emergent setting.

METHODS

A total of 1776 patients and 1610 patients presented to Emergency Department (ED) with psychiatric complaints between January 1 - July 9 of the years of 2019 and 2020, respectively, in Millcreek Community Hospital (MCH) Erie, PA. This study was an electronic medical record review (EMR), therefore the data were collected exclusively from EMR over the two-year span. ED prevalence was calculated as the number of total psychiatric MCH ED cases divided by the total number of all MCH ED patients, and prevalence ratio (PR) between 2019 and 2020 was used to reflect change of overall ED psychiatric prevalence.

RESULTS

Clinical notes revealed increased ED psychiatric chief complaint prevalence, as indicated by a PR greater than one, in multiple categories in comparison to before the COVID-19 outbreak. Concerning primary psychiatric disorders, there was increased ED prevalence in chief complaint of total mood disorders (PR = 1.21) with major depressive disorder (PR = 1.23) and bipolar disorder (PR = 1.47), neurodevelopment disorders (PR = 1.25) with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (PR = 1.19) and intellectual disability (PR = 1.52), trauma- and stressor-related disorders (PR = 1.56) with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (PR = 1.39) and adjustment disorder (PR = 1.73), substance abuse and addiction disorders (PR = 1.29), and personality disorders (PR = 1.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The pandemic outbreak dramatically impacted mental health in an ER setting. Further research on mental health disparities in conjunction with the COVID-19 pandemic is critical to help predict and address risk for chronic symptoms and sequela to help anticipate and improve psychiatric patient care and well-being during potential future pandemics.

10-Year Trends of Emergency Department Visits, Wait Time, and Length of Stay among Adults with Mental Health and Substance use Disorders in the United States

This study examined if there was a change in the number of Emergency Department (ED) visits, wait time, and length of stay among adults with mental health and substance use disorders (MHSUD) in the United States from 2006 to 2015. From the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a total of 17,488 ED visits by adults with MHSUD were identified. Linear regression and negative binomial regression analyses were conducted to assess statistically significant changes in trends of ED visits, wait time, and length of stay. Results indicated that ED visits by adults with MHSUD increased by 30.6% from 2006 to 2015. Wait time of ED visits by adults with MHSUD decreased for the same time period; however, length of stay did not change. Also, there were some differences in trends of wait time and length of stay by diagnosis. Specifically, wait time of ED visits by adults with psychotic disorders did not decrease. Length of stay of ED visits by adults with anxiety disorders statistically significantly increased from 2006 to 2015. More effort is needed to improve the quality of ED care for adults with MHSUD. In such an effort, diagnoses should be taken into consideration.

Characteristics of hospital encounters and associated economic burden of patients with major depressive disorder and acute suicidal ideation or behavior

OBJECTIVES

Relatively little is known about the hospital experience among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and acute suicidal ideation or behavior (MDSI). The objectives of this study were to examine hospital encounter characteristics, including the associated economic burden and risk of subsequent hospital encounters of patients with MDSI in the US.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, patients ≥18 years of age with a hospital encounter (emergency department [ED] visit or inpatient admission) were selected from the de-identified Premier Hospital database between 1 January 2017 and 30 September 2018. Patients were required to have MDD as the primary and acute suicidal ideation or behavior as a secondary discharge diagnosis or vice versa. Patient demographics and characteristics of hospital encounters were examined. Rates and costs of subsequent all-cause and MDD-related hospital encounters 6 months following initial discharge were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 123,179 patients with a hospital encounter for MDSI (mean age: 38 years, 50.9% female, 74.6% White); 50.2% were treated in the ED only (mean ± standard deviation cost: $693±$630), while 49.8% were admitted as inpatients ($6,478±$7,001). Among those with ED visits, very few (7.0%) received an antidepressant (AD). Among those with an inpatient admission, 87.2% received ≥1 AD and 39.0% received AD augmentation. Overall rates and costs of subsequent all-cause and MDD-related hospital encounters were 22.3% ($5,136±$11,791) and 12.0% ($3,722±$9,621), respectively; nearly half of subsequent encounters (41.3% and 44.3%, respectively) occurred in the first month following initial discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of patients with MDSI presenting to US hospitals shows heterogeneity in treatment and a concentration of costly subsequent hospital encounters within 1-month post discharge, suggesting that healthcare systems may benefit from examination of current care pathways for this vulnerable patient population.

Characteristics of the Spanish Older People in the Use of Accidents and Emergency Unit Services (2014-2017)

The aim of this study was to determine which factors are related to Accidents and Emergency Unit (AEU) use by the elderly Spanish population. Observational analysis of the 2014 European Survey of Health in Spain (ESHS-2014; N = 6,520) and the 2017 Spanish Health Survey (SHS-2017; N = 7,024) was employed. About one third (4,095, 30.2%) of the sample used the AEU, and they were primarily women (32.6%). Comorbidity (p = .01), presence of physical limitation in the prior 6 months to the survey, and a history of several diseases (p < .001)-as in diabetes (p < .001), osteoarthritis (p < .001), and chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p < .001)-were associated with AEU visits in both surveys. Female sex and several cardiovascular diseases were only significant in the ESHS-2014. In the SHS-2017, depressive status was an independent risk factor. This epidemiological data allow a better understanding of the use of AEU, suggesting indications for the care process.

Depression symptomology groups among middle and older adult emergency department patients

INTRODUCTION

Middle and late life adults may present depression symptomology differently than the expected symptoms of depression. Clusters of common symptoms may be overlooked when determining the most appropriate treatment options, leading to a less than effective treatment. Investigation of these clusters is needed to better understand patterns of depressive symptomology among middle and late life adults.

METHODS

Consent, demographics, self-report items and PHQ-9 items were administered to subjects. Latent class analysis (LCA), was used to determine groupings of patients based on PHQ-9 items. Demographics were compared across classes for additional information.

RESULTS

A total of 252 subjects aged 45-85 years old were enrolled. An LCA indicated that a 3 class solution explained the clusters endorsed: Low Concerns (35%), Many Concerns (34%), and Sleep and Fatigue Concerns (31%). Patients in the Low Concerns class were more likely to have private insurance compared to those in the Many Concerns class (57% vs 34%, p = 0.003). They also reported better general health (M = 2.39 vs M = 1.58, p < 0.001), and visited their PCP less frequently (M = 1.64 visits vs M = 3.31 visits, p = 0.004).

LIMITATIONS

Recall bias may have been present due to self-report of symptoms which was a report based on a low threshold for endorsement of items. Future larger studies should utilize more response options.

CONCLUSION

LCA suggests there are three unique groupings of symptoms as reported by the PHQ-9. These clusters may be valuable in determining treatment options and designing interventions.

Chronic fatigue syndrome in the emergency department

PURPOSE

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating disease characterized by fatigue, postexertional malaise, cognitive dysfunction, sleep disturbances, and widespread pain. A pilot, online survey was used to determine the common presentations of CFS patients in the emergency department (ED) and attitudes about their encounters.

METHODS

The anonymous survey was created to score the severity of core CFS symptoms, reasons for going to the ED, and Likert scales to grade attitudes and impressions of care. Open text fields were qualitatively categorized to determine common themes about encounters.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine percent of respondents with physician-diagnosed CFS (total n=282) had gone to an ED. One-third of ED presentations were consistent with orthostatic intolerance; 42% of participants were dismissed as having psychosomatic complaints. ED staff were not knowledgeable about CFS. Encounters were unfavorable (3.6 on 10-point scale). The remaining 41% of subjects did not go to ED, stating nothing could be done or they would not be taken seriously. CFS subjects can be identified by a CFS questionnaire and the prolonged presence (>6 months) of unremitting fatigue, cognitive, sleep, and postexertional malaise problems.

CONCLUSION

This is the first investigation of the presentation of CFS in the ED and indicates the importance of orthostatic intolerance as the most frequent acute cause for a visit. The self-report CFS questionnaire may be useful as a screening instrument in the ED. Education of ED staff about modern concepts of CFS is necessary to improve patient and staff satisfaction. Guidance is provided for the diagnosis and treatment of CFS in these challenging encounters.