Ultrasound for the Diagnosis and Management of Suspected Urolithiasis in the Emergency Department

Radiomics signature for automatic hydronephrosis detection in unenhanced Low-Dose CT

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic performance of an automatic pipeline for detection of hydronephrosis on kidney's parenchyma on unenhanced low-dose CT of the abdomen.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 95 patients with confirmed unilateral hydronephrosis in an unenhanced low-dose CT of the abdomen. Data were split into training (n = 67) and test (n = 28) cohorts. Both kidneys for each case were included in further analyses, whereas the kidney without hydronephrosis was used as control. Using the training cohort, we developed a pipeline consisting of a deep-learning model for automatic segmentation (a Convolutional Neural Network based on nnU-Net architecture) of the kidney's parenchyma and a radiomics classifier to detect hydronephrosis. The models were assessed using standard classification metrics, such as area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity, as well as semantic segmentation metrics, including Dice coefficient and Jaccard index.

RESULTS

Using manual segmentation of the kidney's parenchyma, hydronephrosis can be detected with an AUC of 0.84, a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 82%, a PPV of 81% and a NPV of 77%. Automatic kidney segmentation achieved a mean Dice score of 0.87 and 0.91 for the right and left kidney, respectively. Additionally, automatic segmentation achieved an AUC of 0.83, a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 64%, PPV of 71%, and NPV of 82%.

CONCLUSION

Our proposed radiomics signature using automatic kidney's parenchyma segmentation allows for accurate hydronephrosis detection on unenhanced low-dose CT scans of the abdomen independently of widened renal pelvis. This method could be used in clinical routine to highlight hydronephrosis to radiologists as well as clinicians, especially in patients with concurrent parapelvic cysts and might reduce time and costs associated with diagnosing hydronephrosis.

Urolithiasis diagnosed with endovaginal ultrasound after vaginal prolapse repair surgery using mesh: A case report

Pain after vaginal prolapse repair surgery with mesh is generally attributed to the mesh fixation, particularly to mesh erosion, dislocation or the development of hematoma. However, once all the causes have been excluded, the urinary system, bladder and ureters should be accurately examined by means of endovaginal ultrasound. This report concerns the case of a 72-year-old woman who had undergone mesh-supported prolapse surgery 3 months prior, with no other relevant diseases, who visited the emergency department complaining of dull, right-sided colic pain. The endovaginal ultrasound examination revealed a prevesical ureteral calculus on the right side with consequent dilatation of the proximal ureter. Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis confirmed the calculus in the distal right ureter and revealed a right renal lower pole calculus. The patient underwent treatment via an operative ureterorenoscopy with removal of stones and placement of a double-J-stent. Two months later, a second ureterorenoscopy was performed with double-J-stent removal and concomitant stone extraction. It appears that no similar cases have been reported in the literature. This is why, during the urogynecological postoperative follow-up, it is of paramount importance to examine the entire urogenital system with endovaginal ultrasound. This case report highlights how, through a simple, non-invasive, radiation-free examination, like ultrasound, most of the post-operative complications of vaginal prolapse repair surgery using mesh, including urolithiasis, can be excluded.

Nur MA, Mohamed FY, Mohamud AK, Hassan J. The prevalence of urolithiasis in subjects undergoing computer tomography in selected referral diagnostic centers in Mogadishu, Somalia

Introduction and objectives

Somalia was predicted to be in the global stone belt with high urolithiasis prevalence. We aimed to determine the prevalence of urolithiasis and their demographic and computer tomography (CT) characteristics among subjects under CT scans in Mogadishu, Somalia. Materials and Methods: From March 2014 to November 2022, a total of 7,276 patients who underwent an abdominopelvic non-contrast CT scan for various indications were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age was 45.6 years with a standard deviation of 21.1 (range, 0.2-110 years). Patients were subdivided into two categories: adults (≥18 years) and pediatric (≤17 years).

Results

Of the 7,276 patients, 1,075 (14.8%) were diagnosed with urolithiasis. Among those with urolithiasis, 702 (65.3%) were male patients, and 373 (34.7%) were female patients. Among them, adults accounted for 92.7%, while children were 7.3%. Renal stones (nephrolithiasis) were the most common, representing 57% followed by ureteric stones at 35.5%, making upper urinary stones 92.5%. Approximately 70 patients (6.5%) had bladder stones; of these, 26 of them (37%) were accompanied by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). There were 10 urethral stones (0.9%) recorded in the study, all were found in male patients, 8 localized in prostatic urethra, and 2 in the bulbar urethra. The overall mean stone size was 13.2 mm, and 60% of them ranged from 5 to 22 mm. Only 24% of the patients were asymptomatic. Single stones were almost 70%, while staghorn calculi were 8.2%. More than 60% of the patients with urolithiasis showed some degree of hydronephrosis ranging between mild to severe.

Conclusion

A CT scan-based urolithiasis prevalence indicates 14.8% in Mogadishu, Somalia, and these results are consistent with the probability calculation of the weights-of-evidence (WofE) methodology based on several risk factors including temperature, climate change, mineral deposit, drinking water quality, and distribution of carbonated rocks. Considering the high prevalence of the disease, Somalia needs to invest more in prevention and treatment facilities while also training urologists that are capable of utilizing minimally invasive techniques in the country.

The Role of Radiological Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urolithiasis: A Narrative Review

The incidence and prevalence of urolithiasis have been increasing worldwide for the last several decades. This increase could be attributed to many factors, including missed cases of small stones, a sedentary lifestyle, a high BMI, a lack of physical activity, and poor dietary intake. In addition, the increased incidence of co-morbidities such as diabetes, dyslipidemia, infections, and multiple urinary tract surgeries could contribute significantly to the formation of urolithiasis. Radiology has a major role in diagnosing a variety of these stone types and can be used in planning management approaches, either as guidance or as a direct therapeutic method for stones. Because of the availability, safety, cost, and effectiveness of radiological imaging nowadays, urolithiasis is rarely missed; furthermore, the availability of radiological treatment options decreases the need for surgical intervention for urolithiasis, which minimizes hospital stay and surgical-related complications. This review aims to scope and analyze the role of radiological imaging modalities in reaching a diagnosis and planning treatment options for urolithiasis in different circumstances. Information was gathered from relevant peer-reviewed publications in PubMed and thereafter refined and summarized to provide a comprehensive review. The selected indexing terms included "radiological imaging modality," "treatment of urolithiasis," and "diagnosis of urolithiasis," among others.

What are the clinical effects of the different emergency department imaging options for suspected renal colic? A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Clinicians have minimal guidance regarding the clinical consequences of each radiologic imaging option for suspected renal colic in the emergency department (ED), particularly in relation to patient-centered outcomes. In this scoping review, we sought to identify studies addressing the impact of imaging options on patient-centered aspects of ED renal colic care to help clinicians engage in informed shared decision making. Specifically, we sought to answer questions regarding the effect of obtaining computed tomography (CT; compared with an ultrasound or delayed imaging) on safety outcomes, accuracy, prognosis, and cost (financial and length of stay [LOS]).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search using Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science conference proceedings index, and Google Scholar, identifying studies pertaining to renal colic, urolithiasis, and ureterolithiasis. In a prior qualitative study, stakeholders identified 14 key questions regarding renal colic care in the domains of safety, accuracy, prognosis, and cost. We systematically screened studies and reviewed the full text of articles based on their ability to address the 14 key questions.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 2570 titles, and 68 met the inclusion criteria. Substantial evidence informed questions regarding test accuracy and radiation exposure, but less evidence was available regarding the effect of imaging modality on patient-oriented outcomes such as cost and prognosis (admissions, ED revisits, and procedures). Reviewed studies demonstrated that both standard renal protocol CT and low-dose CT are highly accurate, with ultrasound having lower accuracy. Several studies found that ureterolithiasis diagnosed by ultrasound was associated with overall reduced radiation exposure. Existing studies did not suggest choice of imaging influences prognosis. Several studies found no substantial differences in monetary cost, but LOS was found to be shorter if a diagnosis was made with point-of-care ultrasound.

CONCLUSION

There is a plethora of data related to imaging accuracy. However, there is minimal data regarding the effect of CT on many patient-centered outcomes. Further research could improve the patient-centeredness of ED care.

Prevalence of Urolithiasis by Ultrasonography Among Patients with Gout: A Cross-Sectional Study from the UP-Philippine General Hospital

CONTEXT

While urolithiasis is epidemiologically and mechanistically linked to gout, urologic stone disease is not actively investigated in gout patients. Prevalence estimates on the coexistence of urolithiasis in gout have mostly relied on clinical history alone.

PURPOSE

To estimate the prevalence of urolithiasis among adult Filipinos with primary gout through clinical history and ultrasonography.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with primary gout were consecutively enrolled from outpatient clinics of the University of the Philippines Manila-Philippine General Hospital. Clinical data including sex; current age; age at diagnosis, duration of and attack frequency of gout; comorbidities such as hypertension, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia; personal history of urolithiasis; family history of gout; presence of tophus and laboratory samples to assess general kidney function, serum uric acid level, and urine pH were obtained from each patient who was subsequently subjected to ultrasonographic examination for urolithiasis. Lithiasic and non-lithiasic patients were identified and compared aggregately in terms of the aforementioned features.

RESULTS

We recruited 121 patients, 86.8% of whom are male, and 37 (30.6%; 95% CI=23.1-39.3%) were identified to have urolithiasis of which only 12 (9.9%) had history consistent with urolithiasis and 30 (24.8%) were diagnosed solely through ultrasonography. None of the variables of interest were found to be statistically associated (P>0.05) with urologic stone formation.

CONCLUSION

Urolithiasis among adult Filipino patients with primary gout was found to be more prevalent in this study than previous estimates, which were based only on clinical history. We discovered that 25/37 (67.6%) of patients with urolithiasis denied history of urologic stone.

Aktualisierung der S2k-Leitlinie zur Diagnostik, Therapie und Metaphylaxe der Urolithiasis (AWMF Registernummer 043-025)

Die Zunahme des medizinischen Wissens, technische Neuerungen gemeinsam mit demographischem Wandel stellen eine Herausforderung an die Neukonzeption von Leitlinien und klinischen Studien dar. Die vorliegende S2k-Leitlinie, die sich ausschließlich mit Nieren- und Harnleitersteinen beschäftigt, soll die Behandlung von Harnsteinpatienten in Klinik und Praxis unterstützen, aber auch Patienteninformationen zur Urolithiasis geben. Die zunehmende interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit in der Steintherapie zeigt sich auch an der Anzahl beteiligter Fachgruppen und Arbeitsgemeinschaften in der Erstellung des neuen Leitlinienupdates. Die vorliegende, aus einem interdisziplinären Konsensusprozess hervorgegangene S2k-Leitlinie stellt die aktuellen Empfehlungen praxisnah dar und gibt Entscheidungshilfen für Diagnostik‑, Therapie- und Metaphylaxemaßnahmen auf Basis von Expertenmeinungen und verfügbaren Evidenzgrundlagen aus der Literatur.

Point-of-Care Ultrasonography (POCUS) in a Community Emergency Department: An Analysis of Decision Making and Cost Savings Associated With POCUS

OBJECTIVES

Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is an increasingly integral part of emergency medicine. This study investigated community emergency department physicians' choices regarding ultrasonography as a branch point in clinical decision making.

METHODS

During shifts covering all days of the week and all time-spans over a 3-month period, emergency department physicians were interviewed whenever POCUS was used. Questions focused on the role of POCUS in clinical management and on tests avoided because of ultrasonography use. Cost savings attributable to POCUS were calculated using Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services and FairHealth data. Anonymization of data precluded follow-up testing to account for misdiagnosis.

RESULTS

On average, POCUS use eliminated $1134.31 of additional testing for privately insured patients, $2826.31 for out-of-network or uninsured patients, and $181.63 for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services patients. Differences were significant when the total cost of eliminated additional testing was compared to a baseline of no savings (p < .001). Aggregate cost savings remained significant when analyses were broadened to include POCUS encounters that did not yield changes in management (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

When physicians' clinical expertise suggests that POCUS may be indicated, its use results in significant cost savings, even in encounters in which management is not directly impacted. POCUS, when incorporated earlier and more frequently into community hospital emergency medicine diagnostic protocols, can lower direct and indirect costs associated with diagnostic workups. Community emergency departments, in particular, would benefit from additional investigation informing specific guidelines for the integration of POCUS into clinical management and the role that this has in cost savings.