Emergency Physician-Initiated Resuscitative Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Development of a health equity tool in resuscitation sciences and application to current research in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly used for adults with cardiac arrest (CA) refractory to Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS). Concerns exist that adding ECPR could worsen health inequities, defined as differences in health outcomes that are unfair or unjust. Current guidelines do not explicitly address this issue. This study narratively reviews the latest evidence on ECPR, focusing on its implications for health equity and derives a health equity tool that may serve as a basis of comparison for resuscitation sciences.

METHODS

We searched the American Heart Association (AHA) and International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) websites for the latest ACLS guidelines and scientific summaries on ECPR for CA and identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. We identified population and individual characteristics associated with inequities based on the literature and expert opinion. These characteristics were used as a health equity tool to assess: differences in baseline risk, population exclusion and trial representation in studies, outcome analyses, and implementation barriers. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework to evaluate ECPR's impact on health equity.

RESULTS

Four RCTs involving 435 patients were conducted in the (2/4) USA, (1/4) Czech Republic, and (1/4) Netherlands. We identified thirteen characteristics associated with health inequities. All trials took place in urban, high-resourced hospitals and excluded older adults (60-75+ years). Across all RCTs, women were under-represented, and in the two USA-based trials, Black individuals were under-represented. There was no difference in baseline rate of survival with minimal or no neurologic impairment between sexes, but an observed trend favoring younger patients (<65). One trial's subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in ECPR effectiveness by sex or age. We noted that implementing ECPR for out-of-hospital CA faces challenges due to demographic variability, differences in emergency services, access to existing ECPR programs, and limited implementation outside urban areas.

CONCLUSIONS

A health equity tool based on axes of health inequities for resuscitation identified that health equity is reduced with the use of ECPR for CA. Mitigation strategies should involve evaluating demographics, health equity measures, outcomes and ensuring equitable access to ECPR across catchment areas before and after implementation.

Establishing an Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Program

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a complex, life-saving procedure that uses mechanical support for patients with refractory cardiac arrest, representing the pinnacle of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) applications. Effective ECPR requires precise patient selection, rapid mobilization of a multidisciplinary team, and skilled cannulation techniques. Establishing a program necessitates a cohesive ECMO system that promotes interdisciplinary collaboration, which is essential for managing acute cardiogenic shock and severe pulmonary failure. ECPR is suited for selected patients, emphasizing the need to optimize every step of cardiac arrest management-from public education to advanced post-resuscitation care. The flexibility of ECMO teams allows them to manage various emergencies such as cardiogenic shock, massive pulmonary embolism, and severe asthma, showcasing the program's adaptability. Launching an ECPR program involves addressing logistical, financial, and organizational challenges. This includes gaining administrative approval, assembling a diverse team, and crafting detailed protocols and training regimens. The development process entails organizing teams, refining protocols, and training extensively to ensure operational readiness. A systematic approach to building an ECPR program involves establishing a team, defining patient selection criteria, and evaluating caseloads. Critical elements like patient transport protocols and anticoagulation management are vital for the program's success. In conclusion, initiating an ECPR program demands thorough planning, collaborative effort across specialties, and ongoing evaluation to improve outcomes in critical cardiac emergencies. This guide offers practical insights to support institutions in navigating the complexities of ECPR program development and maintenance.

The state of emergency department extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Where are we now, and where are we going?

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has emerged in the context of the emergency department as a life-saving therapy for patients with refractory cardiac arrest. This review examines the utility of ECPR based on current evidence gleaned from three pivotal trials: the ARREST trial, the Prague study, and the INCEPTION trial. We also discuss several considerations in the care of these complex patients, including prehospital strategy, patient selection, and postcardiac arrest management. Collectively, the evidence from these trials emphasizes the growing significance of ECPR as a viable intervention, highlighting its potential for improved outcomes and survival rates in patients with refractory cardiac arrest when employed judiciously. As such, these findings advocate the need for further research and protocol development to optimize its use in diverse clinical scenarios.

How effective is extracorporeal life support for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest initiated at the emergency department? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is commonly initiated for adults experiencing cardiac arrest within the cardiac catheterization lab or the intensive care unit. However, the potential benefit of ECPR for these patients in the emergency department (ED) remains undocumented. This study aims to assess the benefit of ECPR initiated in the ED for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing ECPR initiated in the ED versus conventional CPR. Relevant articles were identified by searching several databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane collaborations up to July 31, 2022. Pooled estimates were calculated using the inverse variance heterogeneity method, while heterogeneity was evaluated using Q and I2 statistics. The risk of bias in included studies was evaluated using validated bias assessment tools. The primary outcome was a favorable neurological outcome at hospital discharge, and the secondary outcome was survival to hospital discharge or 30-day survival. Sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the benefits of ED-initiated ECPR in studies utilizing propensity score (PPS) analysis. Publication bias was assessed using Doi plots and the Luis Furuya-Kanamori (LFK) index.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included a total of eight studies comprising 51,173 patients. ED-initiated ECPR may not be associated with a significant increase in favorable neurological outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-6.70, I2 = 96%). However, this intervention may be linked to improved survival to hospital discharge (OR 3.34, 95% CI 2.23-5.01, I2 = 17%). Notably, when analyzing only PPS data, ED-initiated ECPR demonstrated efficacy for both favorable neurological outcomes (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.26-2.83, I2 = 21%) and survival to hospital discharge (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.52-7.49, I2 = 57%). Publication bias was detected for primary (LFK index 2.50) and secondary (LFK index 2.14) outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that ED-initiated ECPR may not offer significant benefits in terms of favorable neurological outcomes for OHCA patients. However, it may be associated with increased survival to hospital discharge. Future studies should prioritize randomized trials with larger sample sizes and strive for homogeneity in patient populations to obtain more robust evidence in this area.

Implementation of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without On-Site Cardiac Surgery or Perfusion Support: A Tale of Two County Hospitals

Patients with refractory respiratory and cardiac failure may present to noncardiac surgery centers. Prior studies have demonstrated that acute care surgeons, intensivists, and emergency medicine physicians can safely cannulate and manage patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Harborview Medical Center (Harborview) and Hennepin County Medical Center (Hennepin) are both urban, county-owned, level 1 trauma centers that implemented ECMO without direct, on-site cardiac surgery or perfusion support. Both centers 1) use an ECMO specialist model staffed by specially trained nurses and respiratory therapists and 2) developed comparable training curricula for ECMO specialists, intensivists, surgeons, and trainees. Each program began with venovenous ECMO to provide support for refractory hypoxemic respiratory failure and subsequently expanded to venoarterial ECMO support. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created an impetus for restructuring, with each program creating a consulting service to facilitate ECMO delivery across multiple intensive care units (ICUs) and to promote fellow and resident training and experience. Both Harborview and Hennepin, urban county hospitals 1,700 miles apart in the United States, independently implemented and operate adult ECMO programs without involvement from cardiovascular surgery or perfusion services. This experience further supports the role of ECMO specialists in the delivery of extracorporeal life support.

Survival Outcome in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: Early Experience from a University Hospital in Thailand

Objective  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a relatively new technology used for life support in patients with cardiopulmonary failure from various causes. The objective of this study is to review the first 5-year experience in adopting this technology in a teaching hospital in southern Thailand. Methods  The data of ECMO-supported patients in Songklanagarind Hospital, from the years 2014 to 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. Data sources were from electronic medical records and the database of the perfusion service. Parameters in focus included prior conditions and indications of ECMO, type of ECMO and cannulation method, complications during and after the treatment, and discharge statuses. Results  A total of 83 patients received ECMO life support during the 5-year period and the number of cases per year increased. The proportion of venovenous: venoarterial ECMO in our institute was 49:34 cases and there were three cases who used ECMO as a part of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Moreover, there were 57 cases who used ECMO for cardiac failure and 26 cases were for respiratory causes, while premature withdrawal was decided in 26 cases (31.3%). Overall survival from ECMO was 35/83 cases (42.2%) and survival to discharge was 32/83 (38.6%). During therapy, ECMO could restore serum pH to the normal range in all cases. Furthermore, those who used ECMO for respiratory failure had significantly higher survival probability (57.7%) when compared to the cardiac counterpart (29.8%, p -value = 0.03). Patients with younger ages also had significantly better survival outcomes. The most common complications were cardiac (75 cases, 85.5%), followed by renal (45 cases, 54.2%), and hematologic systems (38 cases, 45.8%). In those who survived to discharge, average ECMO duration was 9.7 days. Conclusion  Extracorporeal life support is a technology that bridges the patients with cardiopulmonary failure to their recovery or definitive surgery. Despite the high complication rate, survival can be expected, especially in respiratory failure cases and relatively young patients.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest: An updated systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To provide an updated systematic review on the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) compared with manual or mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation during cardiac arrest.

METHODS

This was an update of a systematic review published in 2018. OVID Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized trials and observational studies between January 1, 2018, and June 21, 2022. The population included adults and children with out-of-hospital or in-hospital cardiac arrest. Two investigators reviewed studies for relevance, extracted data, and assessed bias. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE.

RESULTS

The search identified 3 trials, 27 observational studies, and 6 cost-effectiveness studies. All trials included adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and were terminated before enrolling the intended number of subjects. One trial found a benefit of ECPR in survival and favorable neurological status, whereas two trials found no statistically significant differences in outcomes. There were 23 observational studies in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or in combination with in-hospital cardiac arrest, and 4 observational studies in children with in-hospital cardiac arrest. Results of individual studies were inconsistent, although many studies favored ECPR. The risk of bias was intermediate for trials and critical for observational studies. The certainty of evidence was very low to low. Study heterogeneity precluded meta-analyses. The cost-effectiveness varied depending on the setting and the analysis assumptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent randomized trials suggest potential benefit of ECPR, but the certainty of evidence remains low. It is unclear which patients might benefit from ECPR.

Effect of Portable, In-Hospital Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation on Clinical Outcomes

The time between onset of cardiogenic shock and initiation of mechanical circulatory support is inversely related to patient survival as delays in transporting patients to the operating room (OR) for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) could prove fatal. A primed and portable VA ECMO system may allow faster initiation of ECMO in various hospital locations and subsequently improve outcomes for patients in cardiogenic shock. We reviewed our institutional experience with VA ECMO based on two time periods: beginning of our VA ECMO program and from initiation of our primed and portable in-hospital ECMO system. The primary endpoint was patient survival to discharge. A total of 137 patients were placed on VA ECMO during the study period; n = 66 (48%) before and n = 71 (52%) after program initiation. In the second era, the proportion of OR ECMO initiation decreased significantly (from 92% to 49%, p < 0.01) as more patients received ECMO in other hospital units, including the emergency department (p < 0.01) and during cardiac arrest (12% vs. 38%, p < 0.01). Survival to hospital discharge was equivalent between the two groups (30% vs. 42%, p = 0.1) despite more patients being placed on ECMO during ongoing cardiac arrest. Finally, we observed increased clinical volume since initiation of the in-hospital, portable ECMO system. Developing an in-hospital, primed and portable VA ECMO program resulted in increased clinical volume with equivalent patient survival despite a sicker cohort of patients. We conclude that more rapid deployment of VA ECMO may extend the treatment eligibility to more patients and improve patient outcomes.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - who, when, and where?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is an invasive and resource-intensive therapy used to care for patients with refractory cardiac arrest. In this review, we highlight considerations for the establishment of an ECPR system of care for patients suffering refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

RECENT FINDINGS

ECPR has been shown to improve neurologically favorable outcomes in patients with refractory cardiac arrest in numerous studies, including a single randomized control trial. Successful ECPR programs are typically part of a comprehensive system of care that optimizes all phases of OHCA management. Given the resource-intensive and time-sensitive nature of ECPR, patient selection criteria, timing of ECPR, and location must be well defined. Many knowledge gaps remain within ECPR systems of care, postcardiac arrest management, and neuroprognostication strategies for ECPR patients.

SUMMARY

To be consistently successful, ECPR must be a part of a comprehensive OHCA system of care that optimizes all phases of cardiac arrest management. Future investigation is needed for the knowledge gaps that remain.

Survival and Factors Associated with Survival with Extracorporeal Life Support During Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The survival rate after cardiac arrest (CA) remains low. The utilization of extracorporeal life support is proposed to improve management. However, this resource-intensive tool is associated with complications and must be used in selected patients. We performed a meta-analysis to determine predictive factors of survival. Among the 81 studies included, involving 9256 patients, survival was 26.2% at discharge and 20.4% with a good neurologic outcome. Meta-regressions identified an association between survival at discharge and lower lactate values, intrahospital CA, and lower cardio pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) duration. After adjustment for age, intrahospital CA, and mean CPR duration, an initial shockable rhythm was the only remaining factor associated with survival to discharge (β = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.007-0.02; p = 0.0004).

Extracorporeal Life Support for Cardiac Arrest and Cardiogenic Shock

The rising incidence and recognition of cardiogenic shock has led to an increase in the use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). As clinical experience with this therapy has increased, there has also been a rapid growth in the body of observational and randomized data describing the clinical and logistical considerations required to institute a VA-ECMO program with successful clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to summarize this contemporary data in the context of four key themes that pertain to VA-ECMO programs: the principles of patient selection; basic hemodynamic and technical principles underlying VA-ECMO; contraindications to VA-ECMO therapy; and common complications and intensive care considerations that are encountered in the setting of VA-ECMO therapy.

Goal-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the emergency Department: A feasibility study

Aim

To describe the feasibility of prospective measurement of intra-arrest diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and goal-directed treatment of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the emergency department (ED).

Methods

Retrospective case series performed at an urban, tertiary-care hospital from 12/1/2018 - 12/31/2019. We studied consecutive adults presenting with refractory, non-traumatic OHCA treated with haemodynamic-targeted resuscitation that entailed placement of a femoral arterial catheter, transduction of continuous BP during CPR, and administration of vasopressors (1 mg noradrenaline) and, if applicable, Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA), to achieve DBP ≥ 40 mmHg. Feasibility was measured by the success rate and time to achieve arterial catheterization and BP transduction. Additional outcomes included the change in DBP with vasopressor administration and occurrence of sustained ROSC.

Results

Goal-directed treatment was successfully performed in 8/9 (89%) patients. Arterial access required 1.5 (interquartile range (IQR) 1-2) attempts and BP transduction occurred within 10.5 ± 2.4 minutes of patient arrival. Noradrenaline slightly increased DBP (pre 21.6 ± 8.3 mmHg, post 26.1 ± 12.1 mmHg, p < 0.025), but only 4/23 (17%) doses resulted in DBP ≥ 40 mmHg. REBOA was attempted in 2/8 (25%) patients and placed successfully in both cases. Three (37.5%) patients achieved ROSC, but none survived to hospital discharge.

Conclusions

In ED patients with refractory OHCA, measurement of DBP during CPR and titration of resuscitation to a DBP goal is feasible. Future research incorporating this approach should seek to develop haemodynamic-targeted treatment strategies for OHCA patients that do not achieve ROSC with initial resuscitation.

Brain Injury and Neurologic Outcome in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation has shown survival benefit in select patients with refractory cardiac arrest but there is insufficient data on the frequency of different types of brain injury. We aimed to systematically review the prevalence, predictors of and survival from neurologic complications in patients who have undergone extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (PubMed) and six other databases (EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and Scopus) from inception to August 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials and observational studies in patients greater than 18 years old.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers extracted the data. Study quality was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and case-control studies, and the Murad tool for case series. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The 78 studies included in our analysis encompassed 50,049 patients, of which 6,261 (12.5%) received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Among extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients, the median age was 56 years (interquartile range, 52-59 yr), 3,933 were male (63%), 3,019 had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (48%), and 2,289 had initial shockable heart rhythm (37%). The most common etiology of cardiac arrest was acute coronary syndrome (n = 1,657, 50% of reported). The median extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration was 3.2 days (interquartile range, 2.1-4.9 d). Overall, 27% (95% CI, 0.17-0.39%) had at least one neurologic complication, 23% (95% CI, 0.14-0.32%) hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, 6% (95% CI, 0.02-0.11%) ischemic stroke, 6% (95% CI, 0.01-0.16%) seizures, and 4% (95% CI, 0.01-0.1%) intracerebral hemorrhage. Seventeen percent (95% CI, 0.12-0.23%) developed brain death. The overall survival rate after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 29% (95% CI, 0.26-0.33%) and good neurologic outcome was achieved in 24% (95% CI, 0.21-0.28%).

CONCLUSIONS

One in four patients developed acute brain injury after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the most common type was hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. One in four extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients achieved good neurologic outcome. Further research on assessing predictors of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation-associated brain injury is necessary.

Emergency department extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may also include noncardiac arrest patients

Background/aim

The primary purpose of this study is to report the experience on the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) process for patients in the critical care unit (CCU) of an emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Turkey, from cannulation to decannulation, including follow-up procedures.

Materials and methods

This retrospective and observational study included eight patients who received ECMO from January 2018 to January 2020. We evaluated the demographics, indications for ECMO, laboratory values, Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction, Survival After Veno-Arterial ECMO and ECMO net scores, the management process, and patient outcomes. Blood gas analyses done after the first hour of ECMO initiation and the reevaluation of the patients’ Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores in the 24th hour of ECMO were recorded.

Results

The mean age was 52.7 ± 14.2 years. The median duration of the ECMO run was 81 (min–max: 4–267) h, and the mean length of CCU stay was 10.2 ± 6.7 days. Of the 8 patients studied, 5 (62.5%) had veno-arterial and 3 (37.5%) had veno-venous ECMO. Three patients were successfully weaned (37.5%). The overall survival-to-discharge rate was 25%. Carbon dioxide levels were significantly decreased 1 h after ECMO initiation (P = 0.038) as well as the need for vasopressors. Lactate levels were lower in decannulated patients. Changes in the APACHE II score were more consistent with the clinical deterioration in patients than SOFA score changes were.

Conclusions

In the early phase of ECMO, vital signs improve, and the need for vasopressors and carbon dioxide levels decrease. Thus, CCUs in Emergency Departments with ECMO capabilities could potentially be designed, and emergency department ECMO algorithms could be tailored for critically ill patients in addition to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adults with shock-refractory cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has increasingly emerged as a feasible treatment to mitigate the progressive multiorgan dysfunction that occurs during cardiac arrest, in support of further resuscitation efforts.

OBJECTIVES

Because the recent systematic review commissioned in 2018 by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Advanced Life Support task did not include studies without a control group, our objective was to conduct a review incorporating these studies to increase available evidence supporting the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for cardiac arrest patients, while waiting for high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Science Citation Index (Web of Science) were searched for eligible studies from database inception to July 20, 2020. The population of interest was adult patients who had suffered cardiac arrest in any setting. We included all cohort studies with 1 exposure/1 group and descriptive studies (ie, case series studies). We excluded RCTs, non-RCTs, and observational analytic studies with a control group. Outcomes included short-term survival and favorable neurological outcome. Short-term outcomes (ie, hospital discharge, 30 days, and 1 month) were combined into a single category.

RESULTS

Our searches of databases and other sources yielded a total of 4302 citations. Sixty-two eligible studies were included (including a combined total of 3638 participants). Six studies were of in-hospital cardiac arrest, 34 studies were of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and 22 studies included both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Seven hundred and sixty-eight patients of 3352 (23%) had short-term survival; whereas, 602 of 3366 (18%) survived with favorable neurological outcome, defined as a cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Current clinical evidence is mostly drawn from observational studies, with their potential for confounding selection bias. Although studies without controls cannot supplant case-control or cohort studies, several ECPR studies without a control group show successful resuscitation with impressive results that may provide valuable information to inform a comparison.

Eligibility criteria for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation at Auckland City Hospital: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a promising adjunct to routine advanced cardiac life support. Growing worldwide interest in ECPR-use has seen more tertiary centres offering ECPR programmes. New Zealand's nationwide extracorporeal membranous oxygenation service is provided at Auckland City Hospital (ACH). Despite the potential benefits of ECPR, it is currently only offered on an ad hoc basis. It remains unknown whether ACH would manage sufficient numbers of patients to warrant an ECPR programme.

METHODS

A 12-month retrospective cohort study of the medical records of patients who were managed for cardiac arrest in the resuscitation room of the ED was conducted. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were analysed descriptively and audited against a unique set of criteria for a hypothetical ECPR programme.

RESULTS

Between 1 July 2018 and 30 June 2019, 286 patients died or had a cardiac arrest for which they were managed at ACH. Sixty-five of these patients had an in-hospital cardiac arrest in the ED. Seven (10.8%) of these patients were deemed eligible for hypothetical ECPR. Only one of these seven patients survived to hospital discharge with full neurological recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

An ECPR programme at ACH using standardised and agreed criteria may benefit a small number of patients and improve rates of survival to hospital discharge with preservation of neurological function. An ECPR guideline would help clarify for referring services cases that are appropriate for extracorporeal membranous oxygenation consideration, rather than discussing on an ad hoc basis.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Emergency Department

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a mechanical way to provide oxygenation, ventilation, and perfusion to patients with severe cardiopulmonary failure. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) describes the use of ECMO during cardiac arrest. ECPR requires an organized approach to resuscitation, cannula insertion, and pump initiation. Selecting the right patients for ECPR is an important aspect of successful programs. A solid understanding of the components of the ECMO circuit is critical to troubleshooting problems. Current evidence suggests a substantial benefit of ECPR compared with traditional CPR for refractory cardiac arrest but is limited by lack of randomized trials to date.