1
|
Amin S, Gupta V, Du G, McMullen C, Sirrine M, Williams MV, Smyth SS, Chadha R, Stearley S, Li J. Developing and Demonstrating the Viability and Availability of the Multilevel Implementation Strategy for Syncope Optimal Care Through Engagement (MISSION) Syncope App: Evidence-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e25192. [PMID: 34783669 PMCID: PMC8663445 DOI: 10.2196/25192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Syncope evaluation and management is associated with testing overuse and unnecessary hospitalizations. The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Syncope Guideline aims to standardize clinical practice and reduce unnecessary services. The use of clinical decision support (CDS) tools offers the potential to successfully implement evidence-based clinical guidelines. However, CDS tools that provide an evidence-based differential diagnosis (DDx) of syncope at the point of care are currently lacking. OBJECTIVE With input from diverse health systems, we developed and demonstrated the viability of a mobile app, the Multilevel Implementation Strategy for Syncope optImal care thrOugh eNgagement (MISSION) Syncope, as a CDS tool for syncope diagnosis and prognosis. METHODS Development of the app had three main goals: (1) reliable generation of an accurate DDx, (2) incorporation of an evidence-based clinical risk tool for prognosis, and (3) user-based design and technical development. To generate a DDx that incorporated assessment recommendations, we reviewed guidelines and the literature to determine clinical assessment questions (variables) and likelihood ratios (LHRs) for each variable in predicting etiology. The creation and validation of the app diagnosis occurred through an iterative clinician review and application to actual clinical cases. The review of available risk score calculators focused on identifying an easily applied and valid evidence-based clinical risk stratification tool. The review and decision-making factors included characteristics of the original study, clinical variables, and validation studies. App design and development relied on user-centered design principles. We used observations of the emergency department workflow, storyboard demonstration, multiple mock review sessions, and beta-testing to optimize functionality and usability. RESULTS The MISSION Syncope app is consistent with guideline recommendations on evidence-based practice (EBP), and its user interface (UI) reflects steps in a real-world patient evaluation: assessment, DDx, risk stratification, and recommendations. The app provides flexible clinical decision making, while emphasizing a care continuum; it generates recommendations for diagnosis and prognosis based on user input. The DDx in the app is deemed a pragmatic model that more closely aligns with real-world clinical practice and was validated using actual clinical cases. The beta-testing of the app demonstrated well-accepted functionality and usability of this syncope CDS tool. CONCLUSIONS The MISSION Syncope app development integrated the current literature and clinical expertise to provide an evidence-based DDx, a prognosis using a validated scoring system, and recommendations based on clinical guidelines. This app demonstrates the importance of using research literature in the development of a CDS tool and applying clinical experience to fill the gaps in available research. It is essential for a successful app to be deliberate in pursuing a practical clinical model instead of striving for a perfect mathematical model, given available published evidence. This hybrid methodology can be applied to similar CDS tool development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiraz Amin
- Performance Analytics Center of Excellence, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Vedant Gupta
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Gaixin Du
- Center for Health Services Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Colleen McMullen
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, United States.,Gill Heart & Vascular Institute, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Matthew Sirrine
- Center for Health Services Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Mark V Williams
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Susan S Smyth
- College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Romil Chadha
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Seth Stearley
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li J, Smyth SS, Clouser JM, McMullen CA, Gupta V, Williams MV. Planning Implementation Success of Syncope Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Emergency Department Using CFIR Framework. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:570. [PMID: 34204986 PMCID: PMC8228757 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57060570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Overuse and inappropriate use of testing and hospital admission are common in syncope evaluation and management. Though guidelines are available to optimize syncope care, research indicates that current clinical guidelines have not significantly impacted resource utilization surrounding emergency department (ED) evaluation of syncope. Matching implementation strategies to barriers and facilitators and tailoring strategies to local context hold significant promise for a successful implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Our team applied implementation science principles to develop a stakeholder-based implementation strategy. Methods and Materials: We partnered with patients, family caregivers, frontline clinicians and staff, and health system administrators at four health systems to conduct quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews for context assessment. The identification of implementation strategies was done by applying the CFIR-ERIC Implementation Strategy Matching Tool and soliciting stakeholders' inputs. We then co-designed with patients and frontline teams, and developed and tested specific strategies. Results: A total of 114 clinicians completed surveys and 32 clinicians and stakeholders participated in interviews. Results from the surveys and interviews indicated low awareness of syncope guidelines, communication challenges with patients, lack of CPG protocol integration into ED workflows, and organizational process to change as major barriers to CPG implementation. Thirty-one patients and their family caregivers participated in interviews and expressed their expectations: clarity regarding their diagnosis, context surrounding care plan and diagnostic testing, and a desire to feel cared about. Identifying change methods to address the clinician barriers and patients and family caregivers expectations informed development of the multilevel, multicomponent implementation strategy, MISSION, which includes patient educational materials, mentored implementation, academic detailing, Syncope Optimal Care Pathway and a corresponding mobile app, and Lean quality improvement methods. The pilot of MISSION demonstrated feasibility, acceptability and initial success on appropriate testing. Conclusions: Effective multifaceted implementation strategies that target individuals, teams, and healthcare systems can be employed to plan successful implementation and promote adherence to syncope CPGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Li
- Center for Health Services Research, University of Kentucky, Waller Health Care Annex, 304A, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.M.C.); (M.V.W.)
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gill Heart & Vascular Institute, University of Kentucky, 900 S. Limestone St., CTW320, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (S.S.S.); (C.A.M.); (V.G.)
| | - Susan S. Smyth
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gill Heart & Vascular Institute, University of Kentucky, 900 S. Limestone St., CTW320, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (S.S.S.); (C.A.M.); (V.G.)
| | - Jessica M. Clouser
- Center for Health Services Research, University of Kentucky, Waller Health Care Annex, 304A, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.M.C.); (M.V.W.)
| | - Colleen A. McMullen
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gill Heart & Vascular Institute, University of Kentucky, 900 S. Limestone St., CTW320, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (S.S.S.); (C.A.M.); (V.G.)
| | - Vedant Gupta
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gill Heart & Vascular Institute, University of Kentucky, 900 S. Limestone St., CTW320, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (S.S.S.); (C.A.M.); (V.G.)
| | - Mark V. Williams
- Center for Health Services Research, University of Kentucky, Waller Health Care Annex, 304A, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.M.C.); (M.V.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
White JL, Hollander JE, Pines JM, Mullins PM, Chang AM. Electrocardiogram and cardiac testing among patients in the emergency department with seizure versus syncope. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2019; 6:106-112. [PMID: 31261481 PMCID: PMC6614053 DOI: 10.15441/ceem.18.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Cardiogenic syncope can present as a seizure. The distinction between seizure disorder and cardiogenic syncope can only be made if one considers the diagnosis. Our main objective was to identify whether patients presenting with a chief complaint (reason for visit) as seizure or syncope received an electrocardiogram in the emergency department across all age groups. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected in the 2010 to 2014 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey comparing patients presenting with a chief complaint of syncope versus seizure to determine likelihood of getting an evaluation for possible life threatening cardiovascular disease. The primary endpoint was receiving an electrocardiogram in the emergency department; secondary endpoint was receiving cardiac biomarkers. Results There was a total of 144,094 patient encounters. Of these visits, 1,553 had syncope and 1,470 had seizure (60.3% vs. 44.2% female, 19.9% vs. 29.0% non-white). After adjusting for age, sex, mode of arrival and insurance, patients with syncope were more likely to receive an electrocardiogram compared to patients with seizure (odds ratio, 10.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.52 to 13.84). This was true across all age groups (0 to 18 years, 56% vs. 7.5%; 18 to 44 years, 60% vs. 27%; 45 to 64 years, 82% vs. 41%; ≥65 years, 85% vs. 68%; P<0.01 for all). Car- diac biomarkers were also obtained more frequently in adult patients with syncope patients (18 to 44 years, 17.5% vs. 10.5%; 45 to 64 years, 33.8% vs. 21.4%; ≥65 years, 47.1% vs. 32.3%; P<0.01 for all). Conclusion Patients evaluated in the emergency department for syncope received an electrocar- diogram and cardiac biomarkers more frequently than those that had seizure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L White
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Judd E Hollander
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jesse M Pines
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Peter M Mullins
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Anna Marie Chang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chou SC, Nagurney JM, Weiner SG, Hong AS, Wharam JF. Trends in advanced imaging and hospitalization for emergency department syncope care before and after ACEP clinical policy. Am J Emerg Med 2019; 37:1037-1043. [PMID: 30177266 PMCID: PMC6386626 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Revised: 08/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe recent trends in advanced imaging and hospitalization of emergency department (ED) syncope patients, both considered "low-value", and examine trend changes before and after the publication of American College Emergency Physician (ACEP) syncope guidelines in 2007, compared to conditions that had no changes in guideline recommendations. METHODS We analyzed 2002-2015 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data using an interrupted-time series with comparison series design. The primary outcomes were advanced imaging among ED visits with principal diagnosis of syncope and headache and hospitalization for ED visits with principal diagnosis of syncope, chest pain, dysrhythmia, and pneumonia. We adjusted annual imaging and hospitalization rates using survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression, controlling for demographic and visit characteristics. Using adjusted outcomes as datapoints, we compared linear trends and trend changes of annual imaging and hospitalization rates before and after 2007 with aggregate-level multivariable linear regression. RESULTS From 2002 to 2007, advanced imaging rates for syncope increased from 27.2% to 42.1% but had no significant trend after 2007 (trend change: -3.1%; 95%CI -4.7, -1.6). Hospitalization rates remained at approximately 37% from 2002 to 2007 but declined to 25.7% by 2015 (trend change: -2.2%; 95%CI -3.0, -1.4). Similar trend changes occurred among control conditions versus syncope, including advanced imaging for headache (difference in trend change: -0.6%; 95%CI -2.8, 1.6) and hospitalizations for chest pain, dysrhythmia, and pneumonia (differences in trend changes: 0.1% [95%CI -1.9, 2.0]; -0.9% [95%CI -3.1, 1.3]; and -1.2% [95%CI -5.3, 2.9], respectively). CONCLUSIONS Before and after the release of 2007 ACEP syncope guidelines, trends in advanced imaging and hospitalization for ED syncope visits had similar changes compared to control conditions. Changes in syncope care may, therefore, reflect broader practice shifts rather than a direct association with the 2007 ACEP guideline. Moreover, utilization of advanced imaging remains prevalent. To reduce low-value care, policymakers should augment society guidelines with additional policy changes such as reportable quality measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shih-Chuan Chou
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Justine M Nagurney
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America; Institute of Aging Research, Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Scott G Weiner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Arthur S Hong
- Department of Medicine, Department of Clinical Science, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States of America.
| | - J Frank Wharam
- Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
UNLABELLED Introduction Emergency Medical Service (EMS) systems are vital in the identification, assessment, and treatment of trauma, stroke, myocardial infarction, and sepsis patients, improving early recognition, resuscitation, and transport. Emergency Medical Service personnel provide similar care for patients with syncope. The role of EMS in the management of patients with syncope has not been reported. Hypothesis/Objective The objective of this study was to describe the management of out-of-hospital syncope by prehospital providers in an urban EMS system. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutively enrolled patients over 18 years of age, over a two-year period, who presented by EMS with syncope, or near-syncope, to a tertiary care emergency department (ED). Demographics included comorbidities, history, and physical exam findings documented by prehospital providers, as well as the interventions provided. Data were collected from standardized patient care records for descriptive analysis. RESULTS Of the 723 patients presenting with syncope to the ED, 284 (39.3%) were transported by EMS. Compared to non-EMS patients, those who arrived by ambulance were older (mean age 65 [SD = 18.5] years versus 61 [SD = 19.2] years; P = .019). There were no statistically significant differences in cardiovascular comorbidities (hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, stroke, or congestive heart failure) between EMS and non-EMS patients. The most common chief complaints were fainting (50.0%) and dizziness (44.7%). The most common intervention provided was cardiac monitoring (55.6%), followed by administration of normal saline infusion (50.5%), oxygen (41.9%), blood glucose check (41.5%), and electrocardiogram (EKG; 40.5%). CONCLUSION Emergency Medical Service personnel transport more than one-third of patients presenting to the ED with syncope. Documentation of key elements of the history (witnesses, prodrome, predisposing factors, and post-event symptoms) and physical examination were not recorded consistently. Long BJ , Serrano LA , Cabanas JG , Bellolio MF . Opportunities for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) care of syncope. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(4):349-352.
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Schuur JD, Baugh CW, Hess EP, Hilton JA, Pines JM, Asplin BR. Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment: tools to improve the value of emergency care. Acad Emerg Med 2011; 18:e52-63. [PMID: 21676050 PMCID: PMC3717297 DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01096.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The decision to admit a patient to the hospital after an emergency department (ED) visit is expensive, frequently not evidence-based, and variable. Outpatient critical pathways are a promising approach to reduce hospital admission after emergency care. Critical pathways exist to risk stratify patients for potentially serious diagnoses (e.g., acute myocardial infarction [AMI]) or evaluate response to therapy (e.g., community-acquired pneumonia) within a short time period (i.e., less than 36 hours), to determine if further hospital-based acute care is needed. Yet, such pathways are variably used while many patients are admitted for conditions for which they could be treated as outpatients. In this article, the authors propose a model of post-ED critical pathways, describe their role in emergency care, list common diagnoses that are amenable to critical pathways in the outpatient setting, and propose a research agenda to address barriers and solutions to increase the use of outpatient critical pathways. If emergency providers are to routinely conduct rapid evaluations in outpatient or observation settings, they must have several conditions at their disposal: 1) evidence-based tools to accurately risk stratify patients for protocolized care, 2) systems of care that reliably facilitate workup in the outpatient setting, and 3) a medical environment conducive to noninpatient pathways, with aligned risks and incentives among patients, providers, and payers. Increased use of critical pathways after emergency care is a potential way to improve the value of emergency care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremiah D Schuur
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Accuracy and quality of clinical decision rules for syncope in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2010; 56:362-373.e1. [PMID: 20868906 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2009] [Revised: 04/27/2010] [Accepted: 05/11/2010] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE We assess the methodological quality and prognostic accuracy of clinical decision rules in emergency department (ED) syncope patients. METHODS We searched 6 electronic databases, reviewed reference lists of included studies, and contacted content experts to identify articles for review. Studies that derived or validated clinical decision rules in ED syncope patients were included. Two reviewers independently screened records for relevance, selected studies for inclusion, assessed study quality, and abstracted data. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool diagnostic performance estimates across studies that derived or validated the same clinical decision rule. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed with the I(2) statistic, and subgroup hypotheses were tested with a test of interaction. RESULTS We identified 18 eligible studies. Deficiencies in outcome (blinding) and interrater reliability assessment were the most common methodological weaknesses. Meta-analysis of the San Francisco Syncope Rule (sensitivity 86% [95% confidence interval {CI} 83% to 89%]; specificity 49% [95% CI 48% to 51%]) and the Osservatorio Epidemiologico sulla Sincope nel Lazio risk score (sensitivity 95% [95% CI 88% to 98%]; specificity 31% [95% CI 29% to 34%]). Subgroup analysis identified study design (prospective, diagnostic odds ratio 8.82 [95% CI 3.5 to 22] versus retrospective, diagnostic odds ratio 2.45 [95% CI 0.96 to 6.21]) and ECG determination (by evaluating physician, diagnostic odds ratio 25.5 [95% CI 4.41 to 148] versus researcher or cardiologist, diagnostic odds ratio 4 [95% CI 2.15 to 7.55]) as potential explanations for the variability in San Francisco Syncope Rule performance. CONCLUSION The methodological quality and prognostic accuracy of clinical decision rules for syncope are limited. Differences in study design and ECG interpretation may account for the variable prognostic performance of the San Francisco Syncope Rule when validated in different practice settings.
Collapse
|
9
|
Petkar S, Bell W, Rice N, Iddon P, Cooper P, Fitzpatrick A. Rationale for a rapid access blackouts triage clinic. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008. [DOI: 10.12968/bjca.2008.3.10.31223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Paul Cooper
- Greater Manchester Centre for Neurosciences, Hope Hospital, Salford
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nishida K, Hirota SK, Tokeshi J. Laugh syncope as a rare sub-type of the situational syncopes: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2008; 2:197. [PMID: 18538031 PMCID: PMC2440757 DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-2-197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2007] [Accepted: 06/07/2008] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Laughter is a good medicine; it enhances cardiovascular health and the immune system. What happens, however, if a person laughs too much or the laughter becomes out of control? Laughter-induced syncope is rare and likely goes unrecognized by many health care providers. It is thought to be another form of Valsalva-induced syncope. Case presentation We report the case of a 56-year-old, moderately obese (body mass index of 35) man with a past medical history of sleep apnea, hypertension and hyperlipidemia who suffered from syncope secondary to intense laughter. The patient also had a history of syncope in the distant past when he collapsed on the floor for several seconds. Treadmill stress testing after the incident revealed no arrhythmia or ischemic disease, although he complained of dizziness after the test and a sudden drop in blood pressure was noted. Conclusion Laughter-induced or gelastic syncope is extremely rare. It is thought to be a sub-type of the situational syncopes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsufumi Nishida
- Department of Medicine, John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|