1
|
Green L, Ashton K, Parry-Williams L, Dyakova M, Clemens T, Bellis MA. Facilitators, Barriers and Views on the Role of Public Health Institutes in Promoting and Using Health Impact Assessment-An International Virtual Scoping Survey and Expert Interviews. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:13367. [PMID: 36293948 PMCID: PMC9602578 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Public health institutes have an important role in promoting and protecting the health and well-being of populations. A key focus of such institutes are the wider determinants of health, embracing the need to advocate for 'Health in All Policies' (HiAP). A valuable tool to support this is the health impact assessment. This study aims to support public health institutes to advocate more successfully for the use of health impact assessments and HiAP in order to promote and protect health, well-being and equity. During July 2021, a quantitative online survey was undertaken across international networks with 17 valid responses received. Semi-structured interviews were also administered with nine expert representatives and analysed thematically. In total, 64.7% (n = 11) of survey respondents were aware of health impact assessments and 47.1% (n = 8) currently conducted health impact assessments. It was noted that there are differing approaches to HIAs, with a need for a clear set of standards. Barriers to use included lack of knowledge, training and resources. Overall, 64.7% (n = 11) of survey respondents would like to do more to develop knowledge and capacity around health impact assessments. The results from this study can serve as a platform to help build knowledge, networks and expertise, to help support a 'Health in All Policies' approach and address inequalities which exist in all societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liz Green
- Policy and International Health, WHO Collaborating Centre on ‘Investment in Health and Well-Being’, Public Health Wales, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK
- Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kathryn Ashton
- Policy and International Health, WHO Collaborating Centre on ‘Investment in Health and Well-Being’, Public Health Wales, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK
- Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lee Parry-Williams
- Policy and International Health, WHO Collaborating Centre on ‘Investment in Health and Well-Being’, Public Health Wales, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK
| | - Mariana Dyakova
- Policy and International Health, WHO Collaborating Centre on ‘Investment in Health and Well-Being’, Public Health Wales, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK
| | - Timo Clemens
- Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark A. Bellis
- Policy and International Health, WHO Collaborating Centre on ‘Investment in Health and Well-Being’, Public Health Wales, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kuchenmüller T, Boeira L, Oliver S, Moat K, El-Jardali F, Barreto J, Lavis J. Domains and processes for institutionalizing evidence-informed health policy-making: a critical interpretive synthesis. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:27. [PMID: 35246139 PMCID: PMC8894559 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00820-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background While calls for institutionalization of evidence-informed policy-making (EIP) have become stronger in recent years, there is a paucity of methods that governments and organizational knowledge brokers can use to sustain and integrate EIP as part of mainstream health policy-making. The objective of this paper was to conduct a knowledge synthesis of the published and grey literatures to develop a theoretical framework with the key features of EIP institutionalization. Methods
We applied a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) that allowed for a systematic, yet iterative and dynamic analysis of heterogeneous bodies of literature to develop an explanatory framework for EIP institutionalization. We used a “compass” question to create a detailed search strategy and conducted electronic searches to identify papers based on their potential relevance to EIP institutionalization. Papers were screened and extracted independently and in duplicate. A constant comparative method was applied to develop a framework on EIP institutionalization. The CIS was triangulated with the findings of stakeholder dialogues that involved civil servants, policy-makers and researchers. Results We identified 3001 references, of which 88 papers met our eligibility criteria. This CIS resulted in a definition of EIP institutionalization as the “process and outcome of (re-)creating, maintaining and reinforcing norms, regulations, and standard practices that, based on collective meaning and values, actions as well as endowment of resources, allow evidence to become—over time—a legitimate and taken-for-granted part of health policy-making”. The resulting theoretical framework comprised six key domains of EIP institutionalization that capture both structure and agency: (1) governance; (2) standards and routinized processes; (3) partnership, collective action and support; (4) leadership and commitment; (5) resources; and (6) culture. Furthermore, EIP institutionalization is being achieved through five overlapping stages: (i) precipitating events; (ii) de-institutionalization; (iii) semi-institutionalization (comprising theorization and diffusion); (iv) (re)-institutionalization; and (v) renewed de-institutionalization processes. Conclusions This CIS advances the theoretical and conceptual discussions on EIP institutionalization, and provides new insights into an evidence-informed framework for initiating, strengthening and/or assessing efforts to institutionalize EIP. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-022-00820-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Kuchenmüller
- Research for Health, Science Division, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | | | - Sandy Oliver
- Social Research Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Kaelan Moat
- McMaster Health Forum/WHO Collaborating Centre for Evidence-Informed Policy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Health Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Fadi El-Jardali
- Knowledge to Policy (K2P) Center/WHO Collaborating Centre for Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.,Department of Health Management and Policy, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - John Lavis
- Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.,McMaster Health Forum/WHO Collaborating Centre for Evidence-Informed Policy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Health Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cave B, Pyper R, Fischer-Bonde B, Humboldt-Dachroeden S, Martin-Olmedo P. Lessons from an International Initiative to Set and Share Good Practice on Human Health in Environmental Impact Assessment. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18041392. [PMID: 33546244 PMCID: PMC7913344 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is applied to infrastructure and other large projects. The European Union EIA Directive (2011/92/EU as amended by 2014/52/EU) requires EIAs to consider the effects that a project might have on human health. The International Association for Impact Assessment and the European Public Health Association prepared a reference paper on public health in EIA to enable the health sector to contribute to this international requirement. We present lessons from this joint action. We review literature on policy analysis, impact assessment and Health Impact Assessment (HIA). We use findings from this review and from the consultation on the reference paper to consider how population and human health should be defined; how the health sector can participate in the EIA process; the relationship between EIA and HIA; what counts as evidence; when an effect should be considered ‘likely’ and ‘significant’; how changes in health should be reported; the risks from a business-as-usual coverage of human health in EIA; and finally competencies for conducting an assessment of human health. This article is relevant for health authorities seeking to ensure that infrastructure, and other aspects of development, are not deleterious to, but indeed improve, human health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Cave
- BCA Insight Ireland Ltd., D02FY24 Dublin, Ireland; (R.P.); (B.F.-B.)
- International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA), Fargo, ND 58103-3705, USA;
- European Public Health Association (EUPHA), Post Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands;
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
- Correspondence:
| | - Ryngan Pyper
- BCA Insight Ireland Ltd., D02FY24 Dublin, Ireland; (R.P.); (B.F.-B.)
- International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA), Fargo, ND 58103-3705, USA;
| | - Birgitte Fischer-Bonde
- BCA Insight Ireland Ltd., D02FY24 Dublin, Ireland; (R.P.); (B.F.-B.)
- International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA), Fargo, ND 58103-3705, USA;
- Fischer-Bonde Consulting, 1727 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sarah Humboldt-Dachroeden
- International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA), Fargo, ND 58103-3705, USA;
- Department of Social Science and Business, Roskilde University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Piedad Martin-Olmedo
- European Public Health Association (EUPHA), Post Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands;
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Publica, 18011 Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigacion Biosanitaria de Granada (Ibs. GRANADA), 18016 Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jabot F, Tremblay E, Rivadeneyra A, Diallo TA, Lapointe G. A Comparative Analysis of Health Impact Assessment Implementation Models in the Regions of Montérégie (Québec, Canada) and Nouvelle-Aquitaine (France). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E6558. [PMID: 32916887 PMCID: PMC7559264 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17186558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Many countries have introduced health impact assessment (HIA) at the national, regional, or local levels. In France and in Québec, there is increasing interest in using HIA to inform decision-makers and influence policies, programs, and projects. This paper aims to compare HIA implementation models in two regions: Nouvelle-Aquitaine (France) and Montérégie (Québec, Canada) using a case study methodology. The objective is to gain a better understanding of the similarities and differences in the approaches used to achieve the operationalization of HIA. The methodological approach involves four steps: (1) design of an analytical framework based on the literature; (2) exchanges within the research team and review of documents concerning the two implementation strategies under study; (3) development of the case studies based on the proposed framework; and (4) cross-comparison analysis of the case studies. The findings show that the two regions share certain similarities, including the strong commitment and political will of the public health organizations involved and a well-established culture of engaging in intersectoral action with municipal partners. Differences mainly concern their different approaches to implementing HIAs in accordance with the regional policies and the organizational and administrative contexts in place. This study identifies potential avenues for supporting the practice of HIA at the municipal level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Françoise Jabot
- Univ Rennes, EHESP, CNRS, ARENES–UMR 6051, F-35000 Rennes, France
| | - Emile Tremblay
- Direction of environmental health and toxicology, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec City, QC G1V 5B3, Canada; (E.T.); (G.L.)
| | | | - Thierno Amadou Diallo
- National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy, Montreal, QC H2P 1E2, Canada;
| | - Geneviève Lapointe
- Direction of environmental health and toxicology, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec City, QC G1V 5B3, Canada; (E.T.); (G.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bert F, Lo Moro G, Gualano MR, Siliquini R. Health impact assessment in Italy: it is time to act. Public Health 2020; 185:223. [PMID: 32679399 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- F Bert
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, Italy; A.O.U City of Health and Science of Turin, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - G Lo Moro
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - M R Gualano
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - R Siliquini
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, Italy; A.O.U City of Health and Science of Turin, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Winkler MS, Furu P, Viliani F, Cave B, Divall M, Ramesh G, Harris-Roxas B, Knoblauch AM. Current Global Health Impact Assessment Practice. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E2988. [PMID: 32344882 PMCID: PMC7246701 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17092988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Health impact assessment (HIA) practice has expanded across the world, since it was established more than two decades ago. This paper presents a snapshot of current global HIA practice based on the findings of an online questionnaire survey. HIA practitioners from all world regions were invited to participate. A total of 122 HIA practitioners from 29 countries completed the survey, following a broad international outreach effort. The large variety in the types of HIAs conducted, and the application of HIA in various fields reported by respondents, demonstrates that HIA practice has evolved over the past two decades. Although differences in the use of HIA were reported across world regions, an overall increasing trend in global HIA practice can be observed. In order to sustain this upward trend, efforts are needed to address the main barriers in the utilisation of HIA. The establishment of new national and international HIA teaching and training offerings seems to be an obvious strategy to pursue along with the strengthening of policies and legal frameworks that specify the circumstances, under which HIA is required, and to what extent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirko S. Winkler
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, P.O. Box, CH-4001 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Peter Furu
- Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, P.O. Box 2099, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Francesca Viliani
- International SOS, Vesterbrogade 149, 1620 København V Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ben Cave
- BCA Insight Ltd., 5-7 St Pauls Street, Gresham House, Leeds LS1 2JG, UK
- Department of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, 74 Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZQ, UK
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
| | - Mark Divall
- Shape Consulting, P.O. Box 602, St Peter Port GY1, Guernsey, UK
| | - Geetha Ramesh
- Advisian, 151 Canada Olympic Rd, Calgary, AB T3B 6B7, Canada
| | - Ben Harris-Roxas
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
- Population and Community Health, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, 301 Forbes St, Darlinghurst 2010, Australia
| | - Astrid M. Knoblauch
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, P.O. Box, CH-4001 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|