Triclosan toxicity in a model cyanobacterium (Anabaena flos-aquae): Growth, photosynthesis and transcriptomic response

Physiological and transcriptome level responses of Microcystis aeruginosa and M. viridis to environmental concentrations of triclosan

The toxicity of triclosan (TCS) to various aquatic organisms has been demonstrated at environmental concentrations. However, the effects and mechanisms of TCS on toxic cyanobacteria remains largely unexplored. This study investigated the physiological and molecular variations in two representative toxic Microcystis species (M. aeruginosa and M. viridis) under exposure to TCS for 12 d. Our findings demonstrated that the median effective concentration (EC50) of TCS for both Microcystis species were close to the levels detected in the environment (M. aeruginosa: 9.62 μg L-1; M. viridis: 27.56 μg L-1). An increased level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was observed in Microcystis, resulting in oxidative damage when exposed to TCS at concentrations ranging from 10 μg L-1 to 50 μg L-1. The photosynthetic activity of Microcystis had a certain degree of recovery capability at low concentrations of TCS. Compared to M. aeruginosa, the higher recovery capability of the photosynthetic system in M. viridis would be mainly attributed to the increased ability for PSII repair and phycobilisome synthesis. Additionally, the synthesis of microcystins in the two species and the release rate in M. viridis significantly increased under 10-50 μg L-1 TCS. At the molecular level, exposure to TCS at EC50 for 12 d induced the dysregulation of genes associated with photosynthesis and antioxidant system. The upregulation of genes associated with microcystin synthesis and nitrogen metabolism further increased the potential risk of microcystin release. Our results revealed the aquatic toxicity and secondary ecological risks of TCS at environmental concentrations, and provided theoretical data with practical reference value for TCS monitoring.

Critical review on the environmental behaviors and toxicity of triclosan and its removal technologies

As a highly effective broad-spectrum antibacterial agent, triclosan (TCS) is widely used in personal care and medical disinfection products, resulting in its widespread occurrence in aquatic and terrestrial environments, and even in the human body. Notably, the use of TCS surged during the COVID-19 outbreak, leading to increasing environmental TCS pollution pressure. From the perspective of environmental health, it is essential to systematically understand the environmental occurrence and behavior of TCS, its toxicological effects on biota and humans, and technologies to remove TCS from the environment. This review comprehensively summarizes the current knowledge regarding the sources and behavior of TCS in surface water, groundwater, and soil systems, focusing on its toxicological effects on aquatic and terrestrial organisms. Effluent from wastewater treatment plants is the primary source of TCS in aquatic systems, whereas sewage application and/or wastewater irrigation are the major sources of TCS in soil. Human exposure pathways to TCS and associated adverse outcomes were also analyzed. Skin and oral mucosal absorption, and dietary intake are important TCS exposure pathways. Reducing or completely degrading TCS in the environment is important for alleviating environmental pollution and protecting public health. Therefore, this paper reviews the removal mechanisms, including adsorption, biotic and abiotic redox reactions, and the influencing factors. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of the different techniques are compared, and development prospects are proposed. These findings provide a basis for the management and risk assessment of TCS and are beneficial for the application of treatment technology in TCS removal.

The pleiotropic role of Salinicoccus bacteria in enhancing ROS homeostasis and detoxification metabolism in soybean and oat to cope with pollution of triclosan

Triclosan has been extensively used as a preservative in cosmetics and personal care products. However, its accumulation represents a real environmental threat. Thus, its phytotoxic impact needs more consideration. Our study was conducted to highlight the phytotoxic effect of triclosan on the growth, ROS homeostasis, and detoxification metabolism of two different plant species i.e., legumes (Glycine max) and grass (Avena sativa). Moreover, we investigated the potentiality of plant growth-promoting bacteria (ST-PGPB) in mitigating the phytotoxic effect of triclosan. Triclosan induced biomass (fresh and dry weights) reduction in both plants, but to a higher extent in oats. This decline was associated with a noticeable increment in the oxidative damage (e.g., MDA and H2O2) and detoxification metabolites such as metallothionein (MTC), phytochelatins (PCs), and glutathione-S-transferase (GST). This elevation was associated with a remarkable reduction in both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants. On the other hand, the bioactive strain of ST-PGPB, Salinicoccus sp. JzA1 significantly alleviated the harmful effect of triclosan on both soybean and oat plants by enhancing their biomass, photosynthesis, as well as levels of minerals (K, Ca, P, Mn, and Zn). In parallel, a striking quenching in oxidative damage and an obvious improvement in non-enzymatic (polyphenols, tocopherols, flavonoids) and enzymatic antioxidants were observed. Furthermore, Salinicoccus sp. JzA1 augmented the detoxification metabolism by enhancing the levels of phytochelatins, metallothionein, and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity in a species-specific manner which is more apparent in soybean rather than in oat plants. To this end, stress mitigating impact of Salinicoccus sp. JzA1 provides a basis to improve the resilience of crop species under cosmetics and personal care products toxicity.

Biochemical and physiological alterations caused by Diuron and Triclosan in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis)

The rise in the utilization of pesticides within industrial and agricultural practices has been linked to the occurrence of these substances in aquatic environments. The objective of this work was to evaluate the uptake and adverse impacts of Diuron (Di) and Triclosan (TCS) on the mussel species Mytilus galloprovincialis. To accomplish this, the accumulation and toxicity of these pesticides were gauged following a brief period of exposure spanning 14 days, during which the mussels were subjected to two concentrations (50 and 100 μg/L) of each substance that are ecologically relevant. Chemical analysis of Di and TCS within gills and digestive gland showed that these pesticides could be accumulated in mussel's tissues. In addition, Di and TCS are preferably accumulated in digestive gland. Measured biomarkers included physiological parameters (filtration FC and respiration RC capacity), antioxidant enzyme activities (superoxide dismutase and catalase), oxidative damage indicator (Malondialdheyde concentration) and neurotoxicity level (acetylcholinesterase activity) were evaluated in gills and digestive glands. Both pesticides were capable of altering the physiology of this species by reducing the FC and RC in concentration and chemical dependent manner. Both pesticides induced also an oxidative imbalance causing oxidative stress. The high considered concentration exceeded the antioxidant defense capacity of the mussel and lead to membrane lipid peroxidation that resulted in cell damage. Finally, the two pesticides tested were capable of interacting with the neuromuscular barrier leading to neurotoxicity in mussel's tissues by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase. The ecotoxicological effect depended on the concentration and the chemical nature of the contaminant. Obtained results revealed also that the Di may exert toxic effects on M. galloprovincialis even at relatively low concentrations compared to TCS. In conclusion, this study presents innovative insights into the possible risks posed by Diuron (Di) and Triclosan (TCS) to the marine ecosystem. Moreover, it contributes essential data to the toxicological database necessary for developing proactive environmental protection measures.