1
|
Valentine AZ, Brown BJ, Groom MJ, Young E, Hollis C, Hall CL. A systematic review evaluating the implementation of technologies to assess, monitor and treat neurodevelopmental disorders: A map of the current evidence. Clin Psychol Rev 2020; 80:101870. [PMID: 32712216 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Technology-based interventions provide an attractive option for improving service provision for neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), for example, widening access to interventions, objective assessment, and monitoring; however, it is unclear whether there is sufficient evidence to support their use in clinical settings. This review provides an evidence map describing how technology is implemented in the assessment/diagnosis and monitoring/ treatment of NDD (Prospero CRD42018091156). Using predefined search terms in six databases, 7982 articles were identified, 808 full-texts were screened, resulting in 47 included papers. These studies were appraised and synthesised according to the following outcomes of interest: effectiveness (clinical effectiveness/ service delivery efficiencies), economic impact, and user impact (acceptability/ feasibility). The findings describe how technology is currently being utilised clinically, highlights gaps in knowledge, and discusses future research needs. Technology has been used to facilitate assessment and treatment across multiple NDD, especially Autism Spectrum (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity (ADHD) disorders. Technologies include mobile apps/tablets, robots, gaming, computerised tests, videos, and virtual reality. The outcomes presented largely focus on the clinical effectiveness of the technology, with approximately half the papers demonstrating some degree of effectiveness, however, the methodological quality of many studies is limited. Further research should focus on randomised controlled trial designs with longer follow-up periods, incorporating an economic evaluation, as well as qualitative studies including process evaluations and user impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Althea Z Valentine
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Beverley J Brown
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Madeleine J Groom
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Emma Young
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Library and Knowledge Services, Duncan Macmillan House Staff Library, Porchester Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, South Block E Floor, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|