1
|
Khan K, Hall CL, Babbage C, Dodzo S, Greenhalgh C, Lucassen M, Merry S, Sayal K, Sprange K, Stasiak K, Tench CR, Townsend E, Stallard P, Hollis C. Precision computerised cognitive behavioural therapy (cCBT) for adolescents with depression: a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial protocol for SPARX-UK. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2024; 10:53. [PMID: 38532490 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01475-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A serious game called SPARX (Smart, Positive, Active, Realistic, X-factor thoughts), originally developed in New Zealand and incorporating cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) principles, has been shown to help reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety in adolescents with mild to moderate depression in studies undertaken in Australasia. However, SPARX has never been trialled in the United Kingdom (UK), and there have been issues relating to low engagement when it has been used in a real-world context. AIMS To conduct the first pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) in England to explore the use of SPARX in different settings. The trial will explore whether SPARX supported by an e-coach (assistant psychologists) improves adherence and engagement compared with self-directed (i.e. self-help) use. The trial results will be used to inform the optimal mode of delivery (SPARX supported vs. SPARX self-directed), to calculate an appropriate sample size for a full RCT, and to decide which setting is most suitable. METHODS Following consultation with young people to ensure study suitability/appropriateness, a total of 120 adolescents (11-19 years) will be recruited for this three-arm study. Adolescents recruited for the study across England will be randomised to receive either SPARX with human support (from an e-coach), self-directed SPARX, or a waitlist control group. Assessments will be conducted online at baseline, week 4, and 8-10-week post-randomisation. The assessments will include measures which capture demographic, depression (Patient Health Questionnaire modified for adolescents [PHQ-A]) and anxiety (Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale [RCADS]) symptomatology, and health-related quality-of-life data (EQ-5D-Y and proxy version). Analyses will be primarily descriptive. Qualitative interviews will be undertaken with a proportion of the participants and clinical staff as part of a process evaluation, and the qualitative data gathered will be thematically analysed. Finally, feasibility data will be collected on recruitment details, overall study uptake and engagement with SPARX, participant retention, and youth-reported acceptability of the intervention. DISCUSSION The findings will inform the design of a future definitive RCT of SPARX in the UK. If the subsequent definitive RCT demonstrates that SPARX is effective, then an online serious game utilising CBT principles ultimately has the potential to improve the provision of care within the UK's health services if delivered en masse. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN: ISRCTN15124804. Registered on 16 January 2023, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15124804 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Khan
- Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
| | - C L Hall
- Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - C Babbage
- Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - S Dodzo
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - C Greenhalgh
- School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - M Lucassen
- School of Health and Psychological Sciences, University of London, London, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - S Merry
- School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - K Sayal
- Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for Mood Disorders, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - K Sprange
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - K Stasiak
- School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - C R Tench
- Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
- Precision Imaging Beacon, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - E Townsend
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - P Stallard
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - C Hollis
- Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Valentine AZ, Hall SS, Sayal K, Hall CL. Waiting-list interventions for children and young people using child and adolescent mental health services: a systematic review. BMJ Ment Health 2024; 27:e300844. [PMID: 38302408 PMCID: PMC10836350 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
QUESTION Children and young people experience delays in assessment and/or treatment within mental health services. The objective of this systematic review, funded by the Emerging Minds Network, was to explore the current evidence base for mental health waiting list interventions to support children and young people. STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2023 (last searched October 2023). Included studies described interventions to support children and young people and/or their family while on a waiting list for child and adolescent mental health services. Titles and abstracts were screened independently by two reviewers, data were extracted by one reviewer, confirmed by a second and a narrative synthesis was provided. FINDINGS Eighteen studies including 1253 children and young people were identified. Studies described waiting list interventions for autism spectrum disorders, eating disorders, generic conditions, transgender health, anxiety/depression, self-harm and suicide and behavioural issues. Many interventions were multicomponent; 94% involved psychoeducation, other components included parental support, bibliotherapy and coaching. Duration of the interventions ranged from a single session to over a year; 66% involved face-to-face contact. All studies demonstrated benefits in terms of improved clinical outcomes and/or feasibility/acceptability. Evidence for service outcomes/efficiency was largely unexplored. Limitations of the underpinning research, such as sample size and low-quality papers, limit the findings. CONCLUSIONS There is limited research exploring waiting list interventions, however, the findings from small-scale studies are promising. Further research using robust study designs and real-world implementation studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Althea Z Valentine
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sophie S Hall
- University of Nottingham, Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kapil Sayal
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hall CL, Marston L, Khan K, Brown BJ, Sanderson C, Andrén P, Bennett S, Heyman I, Mataix-Cols D, Serlachius E, Hollis C, Murphy T. The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on tic symptoms in children and young people: a prospective cohort study. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2023; 54:1499-1509. [PMID: 35416566 PMCID: PMC9005616 DOI: 10.1007/s10578-022-01348-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
To understand how children and young people with tic disorders were affected by COVID-19, we compared pre and during pandemic scores on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS). Participants were young people (N = 112; male:78%; 9-17 years) randomised to the control arm of the "ORBIT-Trial" (ISRCTN70758207, ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT03483493). For this analysis, the control arm was split into two groups: one group was followed up to 12-months' post-randomisation before the pandemic started (pre-COVID group, n = 44); the other group was impacted by the pandemic at the 12-month follow-up (during-COVID group, n = 47). Mixed effects linear regression modelling was conducted to explore differences in YGTSS at 6- and 12-months post-randomisation. There were no significant differences in tic symptom or severity between participants who were assessed before and during COVID-19. This finding was not influenced by age, gender, symptoms of anxiety or autism spectrum disorder. Thus, the COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly impact existing tic symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L Hall
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK.
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Louise Marston
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, Upper 3rd Floor, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, UK
| | - Kareem Khan
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Beverley J Brown
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte Sanderson
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), 30 Guilford Street, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, UK
| | - Per Andrén
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Stockholm Health Care Services, Karolinska Institutet, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sophie Bennett
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), 30 Guilford Street, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, UK
| | - Isobel Heyman
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), 30 Guilford Street, London, UK
| | - David Mataix-Cols
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Stockholm Health Care Services, Karolinska Institutet, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Serlachius
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Stockholm Health Care Services, Karolinska Institutet, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Chris Hollis
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tara Murphy
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), 30 Guilford Street, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bellato A, Hall CL, Groom MJ, Simonoff E, Thapar A, Hollis C, Cortese S. Practitioner Review: Clinical utility of the QbTest for the assessment and diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder - a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2023. [PMID: 37800347 DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several computerised cognitive tests (e.g. continuous performance test) have been developed to support the clinical assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Here, we appraised the evidence-base underpinning the use of one of these tests - the QbTest - in clinical practice, by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating its accuracy and clinical utility. METHODS Based on a preregistered protocol (CRD42022377671), we searched PubMed, Medline, Ovid Embase, APA PsycINFO and Web of Science on 15th August 2022, with no language/type of document restrictions. We included studies reporting accuracy measures (e.g. sensitivity, specificity, or Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve, AUC) for QbTest in discriminating between people with and without DSM/ICD ADHD diagnosis. Risk of bias was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2). A generic inverse variance meta-analysis was conducted on AUC scores. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a random-effects bivariate model in R. RESULTS We included 15 studies (2,058 participants; 48.6% with ADHD). QbTest Total scores showed acceptable, rather than good, sensitivity (0.78 [95% confidence interval: 0.69; 0.85]) and specificity (0.70 [0.57; 0.81]), while subscales showed low-to-moderate sensitivity (ranging from 0.48 [0.35; 0.61] to 0.65 [0.52; 0.75]) and moderate-to-good specificity (from 0.65 [0.48; 0.78] to 0.83 [0.60; 0.94]). Pooled AUC scores suggested moderate-to-acceptable discriminative ability (Q-Total: 0.72 [0.57; 0.87]; Q-Activity: 0.67 [0.58; 0.77); Q-Inattention: 0.66 [0.59; 0.72]; Q-Impulsivity: 0.59 [0.53; 0.64]). CONCLUSIONS When used on their own, QbTest scores available to clinicians are not sufficiently accurate in discriminating between ADHD and non-ADHD clinical cases. Therefore, the QbTest should not be used as stand-alone screening or diagnostic tool, or as a triage system for accepting individuals on the waiting-list for clinical services. However, when used as an adjunct to support a full clinical assessment, QbTest can produce efficiencies in the assessment pathway and reduce the time to diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Bellato
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Malaysia
- Mind & Neurodevelopment (MiND) Research Cluster, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Malaysia
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Madeleine J Groom
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Emily Simonoff
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - Anita Thapar
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Wolfson Centre for Young People's Mental Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Samuele Cortese
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences (CNS and Psychiatry), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Hassenfeld Children's Hospital at NYU Langone, New York University Child Study Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hollis C, Hall CL, Khan K, Le Novere M, Marston L, Jones R, Hunter R, Brown BJ, Sanderson C, Andrén P, Bennett SD, Chamberlain LR, Davies EB, Evans A, Kouzoupi N, McKenzie C, Heyman I, Kilgariff J, Glazebrook C, Mataix-Cols D, Serlachius E, Murray E, Murphy T. Online remote behavioural intervention for tics in 9- to 17-year-olds: the ORBIT RCT with embedded process and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2023; 27:1-120. [PMID: 37924247 PMCID: PMC10641713 DOI: 10.3310/cpms3211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Behavioural therapy for tics is difficult to access, and little is known about its effectiveness when delivered online. Objective To investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an online-delivered, therapist- and parent-supported therapy for young people with tic disorders. Design Single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, with 3-month (primary end point) and 6-month post-randomisation follow-up. Participants were individually randomised (1 : 1), using on online system, with block randomisations, stratified by site. Naturalistic follow-up was conducted at 12 and 18 months post-randomisation when participants were free to access non-trial interventions. A subset of participants participated in a process evaluation. Setting Two hospitals (London and Nottingham) in England also accepting referrals from patient identification centres and online self-referrals. Participants Children aged 9-17 years (1) with Tourette syndrome or chronic tic disorder, (2) with a Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-total tic severity score of 15 or more (or > 10 with only motor or vocal tics) and (3) having not received behavioural therapy for tics in the past 12 months or started/stopped medication for tics within the past 2 months. Interventions Either 10 weeks of online, remotely delivered, therapist-supported exposure and response prevention therapy (intervention group) or online psychoeducation (control). Outcome Primary outcome: Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-total tic severity score 3 months post-randomisation; analysis done in all randomised patients for whom data were available. Secondary outcomes included low mood, anxiety, treatment satisfaction and health resource use. Quality-adjusted life-years are derived from parent-completed quality-of-life measures. All trial staff, statisticians and the chief investigator were masked to group allocation. Results Two hundred and twenty-four participants were randomised to the intervention (n = 112) or control (n = 112) group. Participants were mostly male (n = 177; 79%), with a mean age of 12 years. At 3 months the estimated mean difference in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-total tic severity score between the groups adjusted for baseline and site was -2.29 points (95% confidence interval -3.86 to -0.71) in favour of therapy (effect size -0.31, 95% confidence interval -0.52 to -0.10). This effect was sustained throughout to the final follow-up at 18 months (-2.01 points, 95% confidence interval -3.86 to -0.15; effect size -0.27, 95% confidence interval -0.52 to -0.02). At 18 months the mean incremental cost per participant of the intervention compared to the control was £662 (95% confidence interval -£59 to £1384), with a mean incremental quality-adjusted life-year of 0.040 (95% confidence interval -0.004 to 0.083) per participant. The mean incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was £16,708. The intervention was acceptable and delivered with high fidelity. Parental engagement predicted child engagement and more positive clinical outcomes. Harms Two serious, unrelated adverse events occurred in the control group. Limitations We cannot separate the effects of digital online delivery and the therapy itself. The sample was predominately white and British, limiting generalisability. The design did not compare to face-to-face services. Conclusion Online, therapist-supported behavioural therapy for young people with tic disorders is clinically and cost-effective in reducing tics, with durable benefits extending up to 18 months. Future work Future work should compare online to face-to-face therapy and explore how to embed the intervention in clinical practice. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN70758207; ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03483493). The trial is now complete. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Technology Assessment programme (project number 16/19/02) and will be published in full in Health and Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 18. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Hollis
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, South Block Level E, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kareem Khan
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Marie Le Novere
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Marston
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Jones
- Division of Psychiatry and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Beverley J Brown
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte Sanderson
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK/Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Per Andrén
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sophie D Bennett
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK/Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Liam R Chamberlain
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - E Bethan Davies
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Amber Evans
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK/Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Natalia Kouzoupi
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK/Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caitlin McKenzie
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Isobel Heyman
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK/Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph Kilgariff
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, South Block Level E, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Cristine Glazebrook
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Mataix-Cols
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Serlachius
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elizabeth Murray
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tara Murphy
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK/Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Iflaifel M, Hall CL, Green HR, Willis A, Rennick-Egglestone S, Juszczak E, Townsend M, Martin J, Sprange K. Widening participation - recruitment methods in mental health randomised controlled trials: a qualitative study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:211. [PMID: 37735627 PMCID: PMC10512591 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02032-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Barriers to mental health research participation are well documented including distrust of services and research; and stigma surrounding mental health. They can contribute to a lack of diversity amongst participants in mental health research, which threatens the generalisability of knowledge. Given the recent widespread use of the internet in medical research, this study aimed to explore the perspectives of key partners on the use of online (e.g. social media) and offline (e.g. in-person) recruitment as an approach to improving diversity in mental health randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS Face-to-face and online interviews/focus groups with researchers working in mental health and Patient and Public Involvement partners in the United Kingdom. Recordings were transcribed and analysed using a combination of inductive and deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Three focus groups and three interviews were conducted with a total N = 23 participants. Four overarching themes were identified: (1) recruitment reach; (2) Demographic factors that affect selection of recruitment method; (3) safety of technology, and; (4) practical challenges. Five main factors were identified that affect the choice of recruitment method: age, complexity of mental health problem and stigma, cultural and ethnicity differences and digital divide. The use of online methods was considered more accessible to people who may feel stigmatised by their mental health condition and with a benefit of reaching a wider population. However, a common view amongst participants was that online methods require closer data monitoring for quality of responders, are not fully secure and less trustworthy compared to offline methods that enable participants to build relationships with health providers. Funding, staff time and experience, organisational support, and technical issues such as spam or phishing emails were highlighted as practical challenges facing online recruitment. All participants agreed that using a hybrid approach tailored to the population under study is paramount. CONCLUSIONS This study highlighted the importance of offering a flexible and multifaceted recruitment approach by integrating online with offline methods to support inclusivity and widening participation in mental health research. The findings will be used to develop considerations for researchers designing RCTs to improve recruitment in mental health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mais Iflaifel
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Heidi R Green
- Previously: Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- COUCH Health, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew Willis
- Centre for Ethnic Health Research, Leicester/Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Edmund Juszczak
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Mark Townsend
- NIHR Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre (NETSCC), Southampton, UK
| | - Jennifer Martin
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kirsty Sprange
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kostyrka-Allchorne K, Chu P, Ballard C, Lean N, French B, Hedstrom E, Byford S, Cortese S, Daley D, Downs J, Glazebrook C, Goldsmith K, Hall CL, Kovshoff H, Kreppner J, Sayal K, Shearer J, Simonoff E, Thompson M, Sonuga-Barke EJS. Remote Recruitment Strategy and Structured E-Parenting Support (STEPS) App: Feasibility and Usability Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2023; 6:e47035. [PMID: 37695667 PMCID: PMC10520770 DOI: 10.2196/47035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Structured E-Parenting Support (STEPS) app provides support for parents of children with elevated hyperactivity, impulsivity, inattention, and conduct problems who are awaiting clinical assessment. STEPS will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) within the Online Parent Training for the Initial Management of ADHD Referrals (OPTIMA) research program in the United Kingdom. Phase 1 of the OPTIMA tested the feasibility of participants' recruitment and the app's usability. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to adapt a digital routine clinical monitoring system, myHealthE, for research purposes to facilitate waitlist recruitment; test using remote methods to screen and identify participants quickly and systematically; pilot the acceptability of the recruitment and assessment protocol; and explore the usability of STEPS. METHODS myHealthE was adapted to screen patients' data. Parents' and clinicians' feedback on myHealthE was collected, and information governance reviews were conducted in clinical services planning to host the RCT. Potential participants for the observational feasibility study were identified from new referrals using myHealthE and non-myHealthE methods. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic and outcome variables. We estimated whether the recruitment rate would meet the planned RCT sample size requirement (n=352). In addition to the feasibility study participants, another group of parents was recruited to assess the STEPS usability. They completed the adapted System Usability Scale and responded to open-ended questions about the app, which were coded using the Enlight quality construct template. RESULTS Overall, 124 potential participants were identified as eligible: 121 (97.6%) via myHealthE and 3 (2.4%) via non-myHealthE methods. In total, 107 parents were contacted, and 48 (44.9%) consented and were asked if, hypothetically, they would be willing to participate in the OPTIMA RCT. Of the 28 feasibility study participants who provided demographic data, 21 (75%) identified as White. Their children had an average age of 8.4 (SD 1.7) years and 65% (31/48) were male. During the primary recruitment period (June to July 2021) when 45 participants had consented, 38 (84%) participants agreed hypothetically to take part in the RCT (rate of 19/mo, 95% CI 13.5-26.1), meeting the stop-go criterion of 18 participants per month to proceed with the RCT. All parents were satisfied or very satisfied with the study procedures. Parents (n=12) recruited to assess STEPS' usability described it as easy to navigate and use and as having an attractive combination of colors and visual design. They described the content as useful, pitched at the right level, and sensitively presented. Suggested improvements included adding captions to videos or making the recorded reflections editable. CONCLUSIONS Remote recruitment and study procedures for testing a parenting intervention app are feasible and acceptable for parents. The parents felt that STEPS was a useful and easy-to-use digital parenting support tool. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.1186/s40814-021-00959-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Kostyrka-Allchorne
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Petrina Chu
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Ballard
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nancy Lean
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Blandine French
- Academic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ellen Hedstrom
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Byford
- Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Samuele Cortese
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
- New York University Child Study Center, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital at NYU Langone, New York, NY, United States
| | - David Daley
- Nottingham Trent University Psychology, School of Social Science, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Johnny Downs
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cristine Glazebrook
- Academic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Kimberley Goldsmith
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Academic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Hanna Kovshoff
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Jana Kreppner
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Kapil Sayal
- Academic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - James Shearer
- Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Simonoff
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Margaret Thompson
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Marino C, Khan K, Groom MJ, Hall SS, Anderson S, Mcnally E, Murphy T, Hall CL. Patients' experience of accessing support for tics from primary care in the UK: an online mixed-methods survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:788. [PMID: 37488511 PMCID: PMC10367334 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09753-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tics are common in children and young people and may persist into adulthood. Tics can cause challenges with social, occupational, physical, and academic functioning. The current study explores the perceptions of adults with tics and parents/carers of young people with tics regarding their experience of accessing support from professionals in primary care in the UK. METHODS Two online cross-sectional surveys were completed by 33 adults with tics and 94 parents/carers of children with tics. Participants were recruited across three online tic support groups. Tic specialist psychologists, academic researchers, and people with lived experience of tics provided feedback on the surveys before they were made available online. Mixed-method analyses were conducted on the surveys. Qualitative data from the free-text responses were analysed using thematic analysis and triangulated with quantitative findings where appropriate. RESULTS While some participants felt supported by general practitioners (GPs), many felt dismissed. The impact of tics was not always explored, nor information on tics provided, during the consultation. Although 78.7% of participants were referred to secondary care for their tics, some struggled to get the referral. Within secondary care, most adult respondents were assessed by neurologists whilst young people were typically assessed by paediatricians or psychiatrists. Most of these secondary care clinicians did not specialise in tic disorders, with only 27.9% of participants being assessed by tic specialists. Mode waitlist time was 3-6 months for young people and longer for adult respondents. Some participants were referred to multiple secondary care services, spanning neurology, paediatrics, and psychiatry, with each stating that they do not provide support for tics. 21% of participants mentioned being discharged from secondary care with no ongoing support. Almost one-third of respondents accessed support within private healthcare. CONCLUSIONS Generally, more negative than positive experiences were reported. Possible contributing factors included a lack of clear tic referral pathways, long waitlists, a lack of information about tics provided in primary care appointments and a lack of support offered following diagnosis by secondary care services, together with poor access to tic specialist clinicians. This study highlights areas where improvements to UK services for tics can be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Marino
- School of Medicine, Leicester Medical School, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Kareem Khan
- Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Madeleine J Groom
- Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sophie S Hall
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Tara Murphy
- Tic Disorder Service, PAMHS, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jack RH, Joseph RM, Coupland CA, Hall CL, Hollis C. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on incidence of tics in children and young people: a population-based cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 57:101857. [PMID: 36820099 PMCID: PMC9932691 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the onset of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, clinicians have reported an increase in presentations of sudden and new onset tics particularly affecting teenage girls. This population-based study aimed to describe and compare the incidence of tics in children and young people in primary care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in England. METHODS We used information from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum dataset and included males and females aged 4-11 years and 12-18 years between Jan 1, 2015, and Dec 31, 2021. We grouped the pre-pandemic period (2015-2019) and presented the pandemic years (2020, 2021) separately. We described the characteristics of children and young people with a first record of a motor or vocal tic in each time period. Incidence rates of tics by age-sex groups in 2015-2019, 2020, and 2021 were calculated. Negative binomial regression models were used to calculate incidence rate ratios. FINDINGS We included 3,867,709 males and females aged 4-18 years. Over 14,734,062 person-years of follow-up, 11,245 people had a first tic record during the whole study period. The characteristics of people with tics differed over time, with the proportion of females aged 12-18 years and the proportion with mental health conditions including anxiety increasing during the pandemic. Tic incidence rates per 10,000 person-years were highest for 4-11-year-old males in all three time periods (13.4 [95% confidence interval 13.0-13.8] in 2015-2019; 13.2 [12.3-14.1] in 2020; 15.1 [14.1-16.1] in 2021) but increased markedly during the pandemic in 12-18-year-old females, from 2.5 (2.3-2.7) in 2015-2019, to 10.3 (9.5-11.3) in 2020 and 13.1 (12.1-14.1) in 2021. There were smaller increases in incidence rates in 12-18-year-old males (4.6 [4.4-4.9] in 2015-2019; 4.7 [4.1-5.3] in 2020; 6.2 [5.5-6.9] in 2021) and 4-11-year-old females (4.9 [4.7-5.2] in 2015-2019; 5.7 [5.1-6.4] in 2020; 7.6 [6.9-8.3] in 2021). Incidence rate ratios comparing 2020 and 2021 with 2015-2019 were highest in the 12-18-year-old female subgroup (4.2 [3.6-4.8] in 2020; 5.3 [4.7-6.0] in 2021). INTERPRETATION The incidence of tics in children and young people increased across all age and sex groups during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a differentially large effect in teenage girls (a greater than four-fold increase). Furthermore, in those with tic symptoms, proportions with mental health disorders including anxiety increased during the pandemic. Further research is required on the social and contextual factors underpinning this rise in onset of tics in teenage girls. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth H. Jack
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rebecca M. Joseph
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Carol A.C. Coupland
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte L. Hall
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
- Corresponding author. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gómez Bergin AD, Valentine AZ, Rennick-Egglestone S, Slade M, Hollis C, Hall CL. Identifying and Categorizing Adverse Events in Trials of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Narrative Scoping Review of Trials in the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry. JMIR Ment Health 2023; 10:e42501. [PMID: 36811940 PMCID: PMC9996423 DOI: 10.2196/42501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To contextualize the benefits of an intervention, it is important that adverse events (AEs) are reported. This is potentially difficult in trials of digital mental health interventions, where delivery may be remote and the mechanisms of actions less understood. OBJECTIVE We aimed to explore the reporting of AEs in randomized controlled trials of digital mental health interventions. METHODS The International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number database was searched for trials registered before May 2022. Using advanced search filters, we identified 2546 trials in the category of mental and behavioral disorders. These trials were independently reviewed by 2 researchers against the eligibility criteria. Trials were included where digital mental health interventions for participants with a mental health disorder were evaluated through a completed randomized controlled trial (protocol and primary results publication published). Published protocols and primary results publications were then retrieved. Data were extracted independently by 3 researchers, with discussion to reach consensus when required. RESULTS Twenty-three trials met the eligibility criteria, of which 16 (69%) included a statement on AEs within a publication, but only 6 (26%) reported AEs within their primary results publication. Seriousness was referred to by 6 trials, relatedness by 4, and expectedness by 2. More interventions delivered with human support (9/11, 82%) than those with only remote or no support (6/12, 50%) included a statement on AEs, but they did not report more AEs. Several reasons for participant dropout were identified by trials that did not report AEs, of which some were identifiable or related to AEs, including serious AEs. CONCLUSIONS There is significant variation in the reporting of AEs in trials of digital mental health interventions. This variation may reflect limited reporting processes and difficulty recognizing AEs related to digital mental health interventions. There is a need to develop guidelines specifically for these trials to improve future reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aislinn D Gómez Bergin
- National Institute for Health and Care Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Althea Z Valentine
- National Institute for Health and Care Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Stefan Rennick-Egglestone
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mike Slade
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nord University, Namsos, Norway
| | - Chris Hollis
- National Institute for Health and Care Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- National Institute for Health and Care Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hollis C, Hall CL, Khan K, Jones R, Marston L, Le Novere M, Hunter R, Andrén P, Bennett SD, Brown BJ, Chamberlain LR, Davies EB, Evans A, Kouzoupi N, McKenzie C, Sanderson C, Heyman I, Kilgariff J, Glazebrook C, Mataix-Cols D, Serlachius E, Murray E, Murphy T. Long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of a therapist-supported online remote behavioural intervention for tics in children and adolescents: extended 12- and 18-month follow-up of a single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2023; 64:941-951. [PMID: 36649686 DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the long-term effectiveness of behavioural therapy for tics. We aimed to assess the long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of online therapist-supported exposure and response prevention (ERP) therapy for tics 12 and 18 months after treatment initiation. METHODS ORBIT (online remote behavioural intervention for tics) was a two-arm (1:1 ratio), superiority, single-blind, multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing online ERP for tics with online psychoeducation. The trial was conducted across two Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in England. Participants were recruited from these two sites, across other clinics in England, or by self-referral. This study was a naturalistic follow-up of participants at 12- and 18-month postrandomisation. Participants were permitted to use alternative treatments recommended by their clinician. The key outcome was the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale Total Tic Severity Score (YGTSS-TTSS). A full economic evaluation was conducted. Registrations are ISRCTN (ISRCTN70758207); ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03483493). RESULTS Two hundred and twenty-four participants were enrolled: 112 to ERP and 112 to psychoeducation. The sample was predominately male (177; 79%) and of white ethnicity (195; 87%). The ERP intervention reduced baseline YGTSS-TTSS by 2.64 points (95% CI: -4.48 to -0.79) with an effect size of -0.36 (95% CI: -0.61 to -0.11) after 12 months and by 2.01 points (95% CI: -3.86 to -0.15) with an effect size of -0.27 (95% CI -0.52 to -0.02) after 18 months, compared with psychoeducation. Very few participants (<10%) started new tic treatment during follow-up. The cost difference in ERP compared with psychoeducation was £304.94 (-139.41 to 749.29). At 18 months, the cost per QALY gained was £16,708 for ERP compared with psychoeducation. CONCLUSIONS Remotely delivered online ERP is a clinical and cost-effective intervention with durable benefits extending for up to 18 months. This represents an efficient public mental health approach to increase access to behavioural therapy and improve outcomes for tics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Hollis
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, South Block Level E, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kareem Khan
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rebecca Jones
- Division of Psychiatry and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Marston
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marie Le Novere
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Per Andrén
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sophie D Bennett
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK.,Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.,Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Beverley J Brown
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Liam R Chamberlain
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - E Bethan Davies
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Amber Evans
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK.,Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.,Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Natalia Kouzoupi
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK.,Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.,Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caitlin McKenzie
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte Sanderson
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK.,Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.,Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Isobel Heyman
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK.,Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.,Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph Kilgariff
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, South Block Level E, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Cristine Glazebrook
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Mataix-Cols
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Serlachius
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elizabeth Murray
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tara Murphy
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK.,Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.,Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hall CL, Partlett C, Valentine AZ, Pearcey S, Sayal K. Understanding the Impact of Home Confinement on Children and Young People with ADHD and ASD During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2023:10.1007/s10578-022-01490-w. [PMID: 36633768 PMCID: PMC9835738 DOI: 10.1007/s10578-022-01490-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
To understand whether the mental health of children and young people (CYP) with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and/or autism spectrum disorder (ASD) were differentially affected by COVID-19. We analysed data (n = 6507) from the Co-Space study, a UK web-based longitudinal survey. CYP with ADHD (n = 160;2.5%), ASD (n = 465;7%), and ADHD + ASD (n = 155;2.4%) were compared with a reference group (n = 5727;88%) using parent-completed questionnaires [Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) & Pandemic Anxiety Scale (PAS)]. Baseline to 1-month follow-up differences were compared using linear regression models. CYP with ADHD and/or ASD had higher scores at baseline than other CYP. At follow-up, CYP with ASD showed small but significant improvements in symptoms (SDQ), compared with the reference group. CYP with ASD experienced a worsening of disease anxiety (PAS) and CYP with ADHD a deterioration in functional impairment. These findings indicate a mixed pattern of pandemic-related impact for CYP with ADHD and/or ASD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L Hall
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK.
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Christopher Partlett
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, Applied Health Research Building, University Park, Nottingham, UK
| | - Althea Z Valentine
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Samantha Pearcey
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kapil Sayal
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kostyrka-Allchorne K, Ballard C, Byford S, Cortese S, Daley D, Downs J, French B, Glazebrook C, Goldsmith K, Hall CL, Hedstrom E, Kovshoff H, Kreppner J, Lean N, Sayal K, Shearer J, Simonoff E, Thompson M, Sonuga-Barke EJS. Online Parent Training for The Initial Management of ADHD referrals (OPTIMA): the protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a digital parenting intervention implemented to support parents and children on a treatment waitlist. Trials 2022; 23:1003. [PMID: 36510236 PMCID: PMC9744042 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06952-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children referred for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often present with a broader pattern of conduct problems including oppositionality and defiance. This combination can be extremely stressful to parents, lower parents' self-esteem and negatively impact family life. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that families receive support as soon as possible after their referral. However, as clinical services are overstretched, and traditional in-person parenting intervention programmes are expensive, families often must wait times a long time prior to receiving this vital input. To address this, we have created a digital parenting programme called STEPS. It is delivered as a mobile phone app providing a set of tools and resources that can be easily accessed at parents' convenience. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of STEPS in supporting parents of children with high levels of hyperactivity/impulsivity, inattention and conduct problems, who are waiting to be assessed by specialist children's clinical services. METHODS Online Parent Training for The Initial Management of ADHD referrals (OPTIMA) is a two-arm superiority parallel randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot study. We aim to recruit 352 parents and their children, who have been accepted onto a waitlist in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services or similar child health services. Parents who consent will be randomised 1:1 to either the STEPS or wait-as-usual (WAU) group. The trial will be conducted remotely (online and telephone) with measures taken at baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-randomisation. The primary objective is to evaluate whether STEPS reduces the severity of children's oppositional and defiant behaviour, as rated by parents, measured at 3 months post-randomisation compared to WAU. DISCUSSION Digital solutions, such as mobile phone apps, have potential for delivering psychological support for parents of children with clinical-level needs in a timely and inexpensive manner. This trial will provide data on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the STEPS app, which could support the implementation of this scalable parenting intervention programme into standard clinical care and, ultimately, improve the outcomes for families of children referred to specialist child and adolescent health services. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN 16523503. Prospectively registered on 18 November 2021. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16523503.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Kostyrka-Allchorne
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Claire Ballard
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Sarah Byford
- Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Samuele Cortese
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences (CNS and Psychiatry), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- Hassenfeld Children's Hospital at NYU Langone, New York University Child Study Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - David Daley
- NTU Psychology, School of Social Science, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
| | - Johnny Downs
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Blandine French
- Academic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan CANDAL Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Cristine Glazebrook
- Academic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan CANDAL Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kimberley Goldsmith
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Academic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan CANDAL Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ellen Hedstrom
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Hanna Kovshoff
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jana Kreppner
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nancy Lean
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Kapil Sayal
- Academic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan CANDAL Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - James Shearer
- Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Emily Simonoff
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Margaret Thompson
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Romano LE, Aw WY, Hixson KM, Novoselova TV, Havener TM, Howell S, Taylor-Blake B, Hall CL, Xing L, Beri J, Nethisinghe S, Perna L, Hatimy A, Altadonna GC, Graves LM, Herring LE, Hickey AJ, Thalassinos K, Chapple JP, Wolter JM. Multi-omic profiling reveals the ataxia protein sacsin is required for integrin trafficking and synaptic organization. Cell Rep 2022; 41:111580. [DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
15
|
Andrén P, Holmsved M, Ringberg H, Wachtmeister V, Isomura K, Aspvall K, Lenhard F, Hall CL, Davies EB, Murphy T, Hollis C, Sampaio F, Feldman I, Bottai M, Serlachius E, Andersson E, Fernández de la Cruz L, Mataix-Cols D. Therapist-Supported Internet-Delivered Exposure and Response Prevention for Children and Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2225614. [PMID: 35969401 PMCID: PMC9379743 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The availability of behavior therapy for individuals with Tourette syndrome (TS) and chronic tic disorder (CTD) is limited. OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of internet-delivered exposure and response prevention (ERP) for children and adolescents with TS or CTD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-masked, parallel group, superiority randomized clinical trial with nationwide recruitment was conducted at a research clinic in Stockholm, Sweden. Out of 615 individuals assessed for eligibility, 221 participants meeting diagnostic criteria for TS or CTD and aged 9 to 17 years were included in the study. Enrollment began in April 2019 and ended in April 2021. Data were analyzed between October 2021 and March 2022. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized to 10 weeks of therapist-supported internet-delivered ERP for tics (111 participants) or to therapist-supported internet-delivered education for tics (comparator group, 110 participants). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was change in tic severity from baseline to the 3-month follow-up as measured by the Total Tic Severity Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS-TTSS). YGTSS-TTSS assessors were masked to treatment allocation. Treatment response was operationalized as a score of 1 ("Very much improved") or 2 ("Much improved") on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale. RESULTS Data loss was minimal, with 216 of 221 participants (97.7%) providing primary outcome data. Among randomized participants (152 [68.8%] boys; mean [SD] age, 12.1 [2.3] years), tic severity improved significantly, with a mean reduction of 6.08 points on the YGTSS-TTSS in the ERP group (mean [SD] at baseline, 22.25 [5.60]; at 3-month follow-up, 16.17 [6.82]) and 5.29 in the comparator (mean [SD] at baseline, 23.01 [5.92]; at 3-month follow-up, 17.72 [7.11]). Intention-to-treat analyses showed that the 2 groups improved similarly over time (interaction effect, -0.53; 95% CI, -1.28 to 0.22; P = .17). Significantly more participants were classified as treatment responders in the ERP group (51 of 108 [47.2%]) than in the comparator group (31 of 108 [28.7%]) at the 3-month follow-up (odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.27 to 3.90). ERP resulted in more treatment responders at little additional cost compared with structured education. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was below the Swedish willingness-to-pay threshold, at which ERP had a 66% to 76% probability of being cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Both interventions were associated with clinically meaningful improvements in tic severity, but ERP led to higher response rates at little additional cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03916055.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per Andrén
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Moa Holmsved
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Helene Ringberg
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Kayoko Isomura
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristina Aspvall
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fabian Lenhard
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Charlotte L. Hall
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - E. Bethan Davies
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tara Murphy
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children National Health Service Foundation Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Hollis
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Filipa Sampaio
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Inna Feldman
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Matteo Bottai
- Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Serlachius
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical Faculty, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Erik Andersson
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lorena Fernández de la Cruz
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David Mataix-Cols
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Andrén P, Fernández de la Cruz L, Isomura K, Lenhard F, Hall CL, Davies EB, Murphy T, Hollis C, Sampaio F, Feldman I, Bottai M, Serlachius E, Andersson E, Mataix-Cols D. Correction: Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of therapist-guided internet-delivered behaviour therapy for children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome: study protocol for a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:541. [PMID: 35773723 PMCID: PMC9245208 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06483-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Per Andrén
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Lorena Fernández de la Cruz
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kayoko Isomura
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fabian Lenhard
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - E Bethan Davies
- Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tara Murphy
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Filipa Sampaio
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Inna Feldman
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Matteo Bottai
- Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Serlachius
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Erik Andersson
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David Mataix-Cols
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hollis C, Hall CL, Marston L. Treatment adherence might be the key to online Exposure and Response Prevention for paediatric tics - Authors' reply. Lancet Psychiatry 2022; 9:106-107. [PMID: 35065718 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00503-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Hollis
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK; NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK; Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK; Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Louise Marston
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kostyrka-Allchorne K, Ballard C, Byford S, Cortese S, Daley D, Downs J, French B, Glazebrook C, Goldsmith K, Groom MJ, Hall CL, Hedstrom E, Ibrahim Z, Jarvis C, Kovshoff H, Kreppner J, Lean N, Morris A, Gutierrez WM, Sayal K, Shearer J, Simonoff E, Thompson M, Zalewski L, Sonuga-Barke EJS. The feasibility of a strategy for the remote recruitment, consenting and assessment of recent referrals: a protocol for phase 1 of the On-Line Parent Training for the Initial Management of ADHD referrals (OPTIMA). Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:1. [PMID: 34980279 PMCID: PMC8720938 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-021-00959-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the UK, children with high levels of hyperactivity, impulsivity and inattention referred to clinical services with possible attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often wait a long time for specialist diagnostic assessment. Parent training (PT) has the potential to support parents during this difficult period, especially regarding the management of challenging and disruptive behaviours that often accompany ADHD. However, traditional face-to-face PT is costly and difficult to organise in a timely way. We have created a low-cost, easily accessible PT programme delivered via a phone app, Structured E-Parenting Support (STEPS), to address this problem. The overall OPTIMA programme will evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of STEPS as a way of helping parents manage their children behaviour while on the waitlist. To ensure the timely and efficient evaluation of STEPS in OPTIMA, we have worked with children's health services to implement a remote strategy for recruitment, screening and assessment of recently referred families. Part of this strategy is incorporated into routine clinical practice and part is OPTIMA specific. Here, we present the protocol for Phase 1 of OPTIMA-a study of the feasibility of this remote strategy, as a basis for a large-scale STEPS randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS This is a single arm observational feasibility study. Participants will be parents of up to 100 children aged 5-11 years with high levels of hyperactivity/impulsivity, inattention and challenging behaviour who are waiting for assessment in one of five UK child and adolescent mental health or behavioural services. Recruitment, consenting and data collection will occur remotely. The primary outcome will be the rate at which the families, who meet inclusion criteria, agree in principle to take part in a full STEPS RCT. Secondary outcomes include acceptability of remote consenting and online data collection procedures; the feasibility of collecting teacher data remotely within the required timeframe, and technical difficulties with completing online questionnaires. All parents in the study will receive access to STEPS. DISCUSSION Establishing the feasibility of our remote recruitment, consenting and assessment strategy is a pre-requisite for the full trial of OPTIMA. It can also provide a model for future trials conducted remotely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Kostyrka-Allchorne
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Claire Ballard
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Sarah Byford
- Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Samuele Cortese
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences (CNS and Psychiatry), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- Hassenfeld Children's Hospital at NYU Langone, New York University Child Study Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - David Daley
- Academic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan CANDAL Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Johnny Downs
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Blandine French
- Academic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan CANDAL Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Cristine Glazebrook
- Academic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan CANDAL Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kimberley Goldsmith
- Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Madeleine J Groom
- Academic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan CANDAL Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Academic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan CANDAL Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ellen Hedstrom
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Zina Ibrahim
- Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Hanna Kovshoff
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jana Kreppner
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nancy Lean
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Anna Morris
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Walter Muruet Gutierrez
- Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kapil Sayal
- Academic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan CANDAL Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - James Shearer
- Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Emily Simonoff
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Margaret Thompson
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Lukasz Zalewski
- Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Khan K, Hollis C, Murphy T, Hall CL. Digital and remote behavioral therapies for treating tic disorders: Recent advances and next steps. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:928487. [PMID: 35911244 PMCID: PMC9334700 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.928487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The rapid expansion of access to and engagement with digital technology over the past 15 years has transformed the potential for remote delivery of evidence-based digital health interventions (DHIs). Digital and remote behavioral interventions have the potential to address current gaps in the provision of evidence-based therapies in healthcare services. As the lack of access to behavioral treatments for people with tic disorders is a pressing issue across the world, there is great potential for DHIs to close this treatment gap. Here, we present a critical synthesis of the recent key advances in the field of digitally delivered, remote therapy for tics, outlining the research evidence for the clinical and cost-effectiveness and acceptability of digital or remotely delivered therapy. We found five trials aimed at reducing tic severity in children and young people and one trial for adults. The evidence supports the clinical utility of DHIs to deliver tic therapies, which shows promise in being clinically efficacious compared to an active control. Furthermore, DHIs in trials show good adherence and engagement and are acceptable to patients. The role of human support (including therapists and parents for young people) is likely to be important to encourage adherence. DHIs, where the main therapeutic content is delivered via web-based chapters, are likely to reduce clinical time, and maintain intervention fidelity, but further research is required to understand cost-effectiveness. Despite utilizing randomized controlled trials, only two trials were sufficiently powered to address efficacy and only one trial explored contextual factors that may influence engagement. Moreover, only one trial followed patients for >12 months, thus further long-term follow-ups are required. Specifically, we note that despite an emerging evidence base, DHIs for tics are yet to be routinely implemented in healthcare provision in any country. Drawing on the existing evidence, we conclude by proposing a stepped care model, in which digital therapy is implemented as a widely accessible first-line treatment using a purely online or therapist-supported approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kareem Khan
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Kareem Khan
| | - Chris Hollis
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tara Murphy
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, United Kingdom
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte L. Hall
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hollis C, Hall CL, Jones R, Marston L, Novere ML, Hunter R, Brown BJ, Sanderson C, Andrén P, Bennett SD, Chamberlain LR, Davies EB, Evans A, Kouzoupi N, McKenzie C, Heyman I, Khan K, Kilgariff J, Glazebrook C, Mataix-Cols D, Murphy T, Serlachius E, Murray E. Therapist-supported online remote behavioural intervention for tics in children and adolescents in England (ORBIT): a multicentre, parallel group, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2021; 8:871-882. [PMID: 34480868 PMCID: PMC8460453 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00235-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) is a form of behavioural therapy for tics; however, its effectiveness remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of internet-delivered, therapist-supported, and parent-assisted ERP for treatment of tics in children and young people with Tourette syndrome or chronic tic disorder. METHODS This multicentre, parallel group, single-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted across two study sites in England. Participants were recruited via 16 patient identification centres, two study sites in England (Nottingham and London), or online self-referral. Eligible participants were aged 9-17 years, had Tourette syndrome or chronic tic disorder, had not received behavioural therapy for tics in the past 12 months or were about to start, and had a Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) Total Tic Severity Score (TTSS) of more than 15 or more than 10 if they had only motor or vocal tics. Patients were excluded if they had started or stopped medication for tics within the past 2 months; had current alcohol or substance dependence, psychosis, suicidality, anorexia nervosa, or suspected moderate to severe intellectual disability; or presented an immediate risk to self or others; or the parent or carer was unable to speak, read, or write in English. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by masked outcome assessors to receive 10 weeks of online, remotely delivered, therapist-supported ERP or psychoeducation (active control). Outcome assessors, statisticians, health economists, the trial manager, and the chief investigator were masked to group allocation. Patients were not directly informed of their allocation, but this could be established from the content once treatment commenced and the patients were not, therefore, considered masked to treatment. The primary outcome was YGTSS-TTSS 3 months after randomisation, and analysis was done in all randomised patients for whom data were available for each timepoint and outcome. Safety analysis was by intention to treat. Longer term follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN70758207) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03483493). FINDINGS Between May 8, 2018, and Sept 30, 2019, we assessed 445 candidates for inclusion in the study. 221 potential participants were excluded (90 did not meet inclusion criteria, 84 declined to participate, and 47 unable to contact family). 224 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to ERP (n=112) or psychoeducation (n=112). The enrolled patients were mostly male (n=177; 79%) and of White ethnicity (n=195; 87%). 11 patients were lost to follow-up 3 months after randomisation in the ERP group, compared with 12 patients in the psychoeducation group. Mean YGTSS-TTSS at 3 months after randomisation was 23·9 (SD 8·2) in the ERP group and 26·8 (7·3) in the psychoeducation group. The mean total decrease in YGTSS-TTSS at 3 months was 4·5 (16%, SD 1·1) in the ERP group versus 1·6 (6%, 1·0) in the psychoeducation group. The estimated mean difference in YGTSS-TTSS change between the groups adjusted for baseline and site was -2·29 points (95% CI -3·86 to -0·71) in favour of ERP, with an effect size of -0·31 (95% CI -0·52 to -0·10). Two serious adverse events occurred (one collapse and one tic attack), both in the psychoeducation group, neither of which were related to study treatment. INTERPRETATION ERP is an effective behavioural therapy for tics. Remotely delivered, online ERP with minimal therapist contact time represents an efficient public mental health approach to improve access to behavioural therapy for tics in children and adolescents. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research and Health and Technology Assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Hollis
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rebecca Jones
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Marston
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK; Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marie Le Novere
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK; Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK; Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Beverley J Brown
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte Sanderson
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK; Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Per Andrén
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sophie D Bennett
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK; Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Liam R Chamberlain
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - E Bethan Davies
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Amber Evans
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK; Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Natalia Kouzoupi
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK; Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Caitlin McKenzie
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Isobel Heyman
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK; Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kareem Khan
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Joseph Kilgariff
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Cristine Glazebrook
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Mataix-Cols
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tara Murphy
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK; Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Eva Serlachius
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elizabeth Murray
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK; Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Andrén P, de la Cruz LF, Isomura K, Lenhard F, Hall CL, Davies EB, Murphy T, Hollis C, Sampaio F, Feldman I, Bottai M, Serlachius E, Andersson E, Mataix-Cols D. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of therapist-guided internet-delivered behaviour therapy for children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome: study protocol for a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:669. [PMID: 34593015 PMCID: PMC8481317 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05592-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment guidelines recommend behaviour therapy (BT) for patients with Tourette syndrome (TS) and chronic tic disorder (CTD). However, BT is rarely accessible due to limited availability of trained therapists and long travel distances to specialist clinics. Internet-delivered BT has the potential of overcoming these barriers through remote delivery of treatment with minimal therapist support. In the current protocol, we outline the design and methods of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating an internet-delivered BT programme referred to as BIP TIC. The trial’s primary objective is to determine the clinical efficacy of BIP TIC for reducing tic severity in young people with TS/CTD, compared with an active control intervention. Secondary objectives are to investigate the 12-month durability of the treatment effects and to perform a health economic evaluation of the intervention. Methods In this single-blind superiority RCT, 220 participants (9–17 years) with TS/CTD throughout Sweden will be randomised to 10–12 weeks of either therapist-supported internet-delivered BT based on exposure with response prevention (BIP TIC) or therapist-supported internet-delivered education. Data will be collected at baseline, 3 and 5 weeks into the treatment, at post-treatment, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. The primary endpoint is the 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome is tic severity as measured by the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale – Total Tic Severity Score. Treatment response is operationalised as scores of “Very much improved” or “Much improved” on the Clinical Global Impression – Improvement scale, administered at the primary endpoint. Outcome assessors will be blind to treatment condition at all assessment points. A health economic evaluation of BIP TIC will be performed, both in the short term (primary endpoint) and the long term (12-month follow-up). There are no planned interim analyses. Discussion Participant recruitment started on 26 April 2019 and finished on 9 April 2021. The total number of included participants was 221. The final participant is expected to reach the primary endpoint in September 2021 and the 12-month follow-up in June 2022. Data analysis for the primary objective will commence after the last participant reaches the primary endpoint. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03916055. Registered on 16 April 2019. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05592-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per Andrén
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Lorena Fernández de la Cruz
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden.,Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kayoko Isomura
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden.,Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fabian Lenhard
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden.,Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - E Bethan Davies
- Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tara Murphy
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.,Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Filipa Sampaio
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Inna Feldman
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Matteo Bottai
- Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Serlachius
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden.,Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Erik Andersson
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden.,Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David Mataix-Cols
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden.,Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dismuke-Greer CE, Fakhry SM, Horner MD, Pogoda TK, Pugh MJ, Gebregziabher M, Hall CL, Taber D, Spain DA. Ethnicity/race and service-connected disability disparities in civilian traumatic brain injury mechanism of injury and VHA health services costs in military veterans: Evidence from a Level 1 Trauma Center and VA Medical Center. Trauma 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/1460408620914436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The objective of this study was to examine the association of military veteran socio-demographics and service-connected disability with civilian mechanism of traumatic brain injury and long-term Veterans Health Administration (VHA) costs. Methods We conducted a 17-year retrospective longitudinal cohort study of veterans with a civilian-related traumatic brain injury from a Level 1 Trauma Center between 1999 and 2013, with VHA follow-up through 2016. We merged trauma center VHA data, and used logit to model mechanism of injury, and generalized linear model to model VHA costs. Results African American race or Hispanic ethnicity veterans had a higher unadjusted rate of civilian assault/gun as mechanism of injury (15.38%) relative to non-Hispanic White (7.19%). African American race or Hispanic veterans who were discharged from the trauma center with traumatic brain injury and followed in VHA had more than twice the odds of assault/gun (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.16:5.26), after adjusting for sex, age, and military service-connected disability. Veterans with service-connected disability ≥50% had more than twice the odds of assault/gun (OR 2.48; 95% CI 0.97:6.31). Assault/gun was associated with significantly higher annual VHA costs post-discharge ($16,807; 95% CI 672:32,941) among non-Hispanic White veterans. Military service-connected disability ≥50% was associated with higher VHA costs among both non-Hispanic White ($44,987; 95% CI $17,159:$72,816) and African American race or Hispanic ($37,901; 95% CI $4,543:$71,258) veterans. Conclusions We found that African American race or Hispanic veterans had higher adjusted likelihood of assault/gun mechanism of traumatic brain injury, and non-Hispanic White veterans had higher adjusted annual VHA resource costs associated with assault/gun, post trauma center discharge. Veterans with higher than 50% service-connected disability had higher likelihood of assault/gun and higher adjusted annual VHA resource costs. Assault/gun prevention efforts may be indicated within the VHA, especially in minority and service-connected disability veterans. More data from Level 1 Trauma Centers are needed to assess the generalizability of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- CE Dismuke-Greer
- Health Economics Resource Center (HERC), Ci2i, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, USA
| | - SM Fakhry
- Center for Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Research, CSG, HCA Healthcare, Nashville, USA
| | - MD Horner
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center and Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - TK Pogoda
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, USA
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, USA
| | - MJ Pugh
- Salt Lake City VA Health Care System and University of Utah Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - M Gebregziabher
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center and Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - CL Hall
- Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center (HEROIC), Ralph H. Johnson VAMC, Charleston, USA
| | - D Taber
- Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center (HEROIC), Ralph H. Johnson VAMC, Charleston, USA
| | - DA Spain
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford Healthcare, Stanford, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Khan K, Hollis C, Hall CL, Murray E, Davies EB, Andrén P, Mataix-Cols D, Murphy T, Glazebrook C. Fidelity of Delivery and Contextual Factors Influencing Children's Level of Engagement: Process Evaluation of the Online Remote Behavioral Intervention for Tics Trial. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e25470. [PMID: 34152270 PMCID: PMC8277316 DOI: 10.2196/25470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Online Remote Behavioral Intervention for Tics (ORBIT) study was a multicenter randomized controlled trial of a complex intervention that consisted of a web-based behavioral intervention for children and young people with tic disorders. In the first part of a two-stage process evaluation, we conducted a mixed methods study exploring the reach, dose, and fidelity of the intervention and contextual factors influencing engagement. Objective This study aims to explore the fidelity of delivery and contextual factors underpinning the ORBIT trial. Methods Baseline study data and intervention usage metrics from participants in the intervention arm were used as quantitative implementation data (N=112). The experiences of being in the intervention were explored through semistructured interviews with children (n=20) and parent participants (n=20), therapists (n=4), and referring clinicians (n=6). A principal component analysis was used to create a comprehensive, composite measure of children and young people’s engagement with the intervention. Engagement factor scores reflected relative uptake as assessed by a range of usage indices, including chapters accessed, number of pages visited, and number of log-ins. The engagement factor score was used as the dependent variable in a multiple linear regression analysis with various contextual variables as independent variables to assess if there were any significant predictors of engagement. Results The intervention was implemented with high fidelity, and participants deemed the intervention acceptable and satisfactory. The engagement was high, with child participants completing an average of 7.5 of 10 (SD 2.7) chapters, and 88.4% (99/112) of participants completed the minimum of the first four chapters—the predefined threshold effective dose. Compared with the total population of children with tic disorders, participants in the sample tended to have more educated parents and lived in more economically advantaged areas; however, socioeconomic factors were not related to engagement factor scores. Factors associated with higher engagement factor scores included participants enrolled at the London site versus the Nottingham site (P=.01), self-referred versus clinic referred (P=.04), higher parental engagement as evidenced by the number of parental chapters completed (n=111; ρ=0.73; P<.001), and more therapist time for parents (n=111; ρ=0.46; P<.001). A multiple linear regression indicated that parents’ chapter completion (β=.69; t110=10.18; P<.001) and therapist time for parents (β=.19; t110=2.95; P=.004) were the only significant independent predictors of child engagement factor scores. Conclusions Overall, the intervention had high fidelity of delivery and was evaluated positively by participants, although reach may have been constrained by the nature of the randomized controlled trial. Parental engagement and therapist time for parents were strong predictors of intervention implementation, which has important implications for designing and implementing digital therapeutic interventions in child and adolescent mental health services. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.1186/s13063-019-3974-3
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kareem Khan
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Hollis
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.,NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Murray
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - E Bethan Davies
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.,NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Per Andrén
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David Mataix-Cols
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tara Murphy
- Tic Disorder Clinic, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cris Glazebrook
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.,NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Williams JL, Hall CL, Meimaridou E, Metherell LA. Loss of Nnt Increases Expression of Oxidative Phosphorylation Complexes in C57BL/6J Hearts. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:6101. [PMID: 34198873 PMCID: PMC8201288 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22116101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (NNT) is a proton pump in the inner mitochondrial membrane that generates reducing equivalents in the form of NAPDH, which can be used for anabolic pathways or to remove reactive oxygen species (ROS). A number of studies have linked NNT dysfunction to cardiomyopathies and increased risk of atherosclerosis; however, biallelic mutations in humans commonly cause a phenotype of adrenal insufficiency, with rare occurrences of cardiac dysfunction and testicular tumours. Here, we compare the transcriptomes of the hearts, adrenals and testes from three mouse models: the C57BL/6N, which expresses NNT; the C57BL/6J, which lacks NNT; and a third mouse, expressing the wild-type NNT sequence on the C57BL/6J background. We saw enrichment of oxidative phosphorylation genes in the C57BL/B6J in the heart and adrenal, possibly indicative of an evolved response in this substrain to loss of Nnt. However, differential gene expression was mainly driven by mouse background with some changes seen in all three tissues, perhaps reflecting underlying genetic differences between the C57BL/B6J and -6N substrains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack L. Williams
- Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Charterhouse Square, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (J.L.W.); (C.L.H.)
| | - Charlotte L. Hall
- Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Charterhouse Square, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (J.L.W.); (C.L.H.)
| | - Eirini Meimaridou
- School of Human Sciences, London Metropolitan University, London N7 8DB, UK;
| | - Lou A. Metherell
- Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Charterhouse Square, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (J.L.W.); (C.L.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Williams L, Hall CL, Brown S, Guo B, James M, Franceschini M, Clarke J, Selby K, Vijayan H, Kulkarni N, Brown N, Sayal K, Hollis C, Groom MJ. Correction to: Optimising medication management in children and young people with ADHD using a computerised test (QbTest): a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7:94. [PMID: 33858516 PMCID: PMC8048310 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-021-00830-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Williams
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Susan Brown
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Boliang Guo
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Marilyn James
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Julie Clarke
- United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Grantham and District Hospital, Grantham, Lincolnshire, UK
| | - Kim Selby
- Department of Community Paediatrics, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Kent, UK
| | - Hena Vijayan
- North East London NHS Foundation Trust, Havering CAMHS, Essex, UK
| | | | - Nikki Brown
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Kapil Sayal
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.,Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (CANDAL), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.,NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Madeleine J Groom
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.,Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (CANDAL), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Williams L, Hall CL, Brown S, Guo B, James M, Franceschini M, Clarke J, Selby K, Vijayan H, Kulkarni N, Brown N, Sayal K, Hollis C, Groom MJ. Optimising medication management in children and young people with ADHD using a computerised test (QbTest): a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7:68. [PMID: 33726855 PMCID: PMC7962270 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-021-00788-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) should be closely monitored to ensure optimisation. There is growing interest in using computerised assessments of ADHD symptoms to support medication monitoring. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of one such computerised assessment, the Quantified Behavior (Qb) Test, as part of medication management for ADHD. METHODS This feasibility multi-site RCT conducted in child and adolescent mental health and community paediatric settings recruited participants aged 6-15 years diagnosed with ADHD starting stimulant medication. Participants were randomised into one of two arms: experimental (QbTest protocol) where participants completed a QbTest at baseline and two follow-up QbTests on medication (2-4 weeks and 8-10 weeks later) and control where participants received treatment as usual, including at least two follow-up consultations. Measures of parent, teacher, and clinician-rated symptoms and global functioning were completed at each time point. Clinicians recorded treatment decision-making and health economic measures were obtained. Data were analysed using multi-level modelling and participants (children and parents) and clinicians were interviewed about their experiences, resulting data were thematically analysed. RESULTS Forty-four children and young people were randomised. Completion of study outcome measures by care-givers and teachers ranged from 52 to 78% at baseline to 47-65% at follow-up. Participants reported the questionnaires to be useful to complete. SNAP-IV inattention scores showed greater reduction in the intervention than the control group (- 5.85, 95% CI - 10.33, - 1.36,). Engagement with the intervention ranged from 100% at baseline, to 78% follow-up 1 and 57% follow-up 2. However, only 37% of QbTests were conducted in the correct time period. Interview data highlighted that the objectivity of the QbTest was appreciated by clinicians and parents. Clinicians commented that the additional time and resources required meant that it is not feasible to use QbTest for all cases. CONCLUSION The trial design and protocol appear to be feasible and acceptable but could be improved by modifying QbTest time periods and the method of data collection. With these changes, the protocol may be appropriate for a full trial. Adding QbTest may improve symptom outcome as measured by SNAP-IV. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03368573 , prospectively registered, 11th December 2017, and ISRCTN, ISRCTN69461593 , retrospectively registered, 10th April 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Williams
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Susan Brown
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Boliang Guo
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Marilyn James
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Julie Clarke
- United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Grantham and District Hospital, Grantham, Lincolnshire, UK
| | - Kim Selby
- Department of Community Paediatrics, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Kent, UK
| | - Hena Vijayan
- North East London NHS Foundation Trust, Havering CAMHS, Essex, UK
| | | | - Nikki Brown
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Kapil Sayal
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.,Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (CANDAL), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.,NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Madeleine J Groom
- School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.,Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (CANDAL), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Valentine AZ, Hall SS, Young E, Brown BJ, Groom MJ, Hollis C, Hall CL. Implementation of Telehealth Services to Assess, Monitor, and Treat Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e22619. [PMID: 33326409 PMCID: PMC7819544 DOI: 10.2196/22619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In response to COVID-19, there has been increasing momentum in telehealth development and delivery. To assess the anticipated exponential growth in telehealth, it is important to accurately capture how telehealth has been used in specific mental health fields prior to the pandemic. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aimed to highlight how telehealth has been used with clinical samples in the neurodevelopmental field, including patients with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), their families, and health care professionals. To identify which technologies show the greatest potential for implementation into health services, we evaluated technologies for effectiveness, economic impact, and readiness for clinical adoption. METHODS A systematic search of literature was undertaken in April 2018 and updated until December 2019, by using the Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, and PsycInfo databases. Extracted data included the type of technology, how the technology was used (ie, assessment, treatment, and monitoring), participant characteristics, reported outcomes and authors' views on clinical effectiveness, user impact (ie, feasibility and acceptability), economic impact, and readiness for clinic adoption. A quality review of the research was performed in accordance with the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. RESULTS A total of 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies included participants and family members with autism spectrum disorders (21/42, 50%), attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (8/42, 19%), attention deficit hyperactivity or autism spectrum disorders (3/42, 7%), communication disorders (7/42, 17%), and tic disorders (2/42, 5%). The focus of most studies (33/42, 79%) was on treatment, rather than assessment (4/42, 10%) or monitoring (5/42, 12%). Telehealth services demonstrated promise for being clinically effective, predominantly in relation to diagnosing and monitoring NDDs. In terms of NDD treatment, telehealth services were usually equivalent to control groups. There was some evidence of positive user and economic impacts, including increased service delivery efficiency (eg, increased treatment availability and decreased waiting times). However, these factors were not widely recorded across the studies. Telehealth was demonstrated to be cost-effective in the few studies that considered cost-effectiveness. Study quality varied, as many studies had small sample sizes and inadequate control groups. Of the 42 studies, only 11 (26%) were randomized controlled trials, 12 (29%) were case studies or case series, 6 (14%) were qualitative studies, and 5 (12%) were noncomparative trials. CONCLUSIONS Telehealth has the potential to increase treatment availability, decrease diagnosis waiting times, and aid in NDD monitoring. Further research with more robust and adequately powered study designs that consider cost-effectiveness and increased efficiency is needed. This systematic review highlights the extent of telehealth technology use prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and the movement for investing in remote access to treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42018091156; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018091156.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Althea Z Valentine
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie S Hall
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Centre for Medicine, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Young
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare National Health Service Foundation Trust, Library and Knowledge Services, Duncan Macmillan House Staff Library, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Beverley J Brown
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Madeleine J Groom
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Hollis
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hall CL, Sanderson C, Brown BJ, Andrén P, Bennett S, Chamberlain LR, Davies EB, Khan K, Kouzoupi N, Mataix-Cols D, McKenzie C, Murphy T, Townsend M, Hollis C, Murray E. Opportunities and challenges of delivering digital clinical trials: lessons learned from a randomised controlled trial of an online behavioural intervention for children and young people. Trials 2020; 21:1011. [PMID: 33298127 PMCID: PMC7724811 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04902-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite being the gold standard of research to determine effectiveness, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) often struggle with participant recruitment, engagement and retention. These issues may be exacerbated when recruiting vulnerable populations, such as participants with mental health issues. We aimed to update understanding of the scope of these problems in trials of health technology and identify possible solutions through reflecting on experiences from an exemplar trial (Online Remote Behavioural Intervention for Tics; ORBIT). METHOD We extracted anonymised data on recruitment, retention and requests for more funding and time from trials funded by the largest funder of health technology trials in the UK (the National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment) between 2010 and 2020, and compared these with data from a recent, successful trial (ORBIT). ORBIT aimed to assess the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of blended online and human behavioural therapy for tics in young people. Many of the trial procedures, including recruitment, the intervention and data collection, were undertaken online. RESULTS Data were extracted on 51 trials conducted between 2010 and 2020. Sixty per cent of trials failed to reach their original recruitment target and only 44% achieved their follow-up in the specified time frame. In contrast, ORBIT recruited to target and achieved 90% follow-up. We posit that these achievements are related to (a) judicious use of digital technology for trial procedures and (b) adequate numbers of highly trained and motivated trial staff. We provide details of both these to help other research teams plan and cost for successful trials. CONCLUSION An approach combining human and online methods may be advantageous in facilitating trial delivery, particularly in paediatric mental health services. Given the importance of successful clinical trials in advancing healthcare delivery and the waste of human and economic resources associated with unsuccessfully delivered trials, it is imperative that trials are appropriately costed and future research focusses on improving trial design and delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION The ORBIT trial is registered with ISRTCN ( ISRCTN70758207 ) Registered on March 20, 2018. and ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03483493 ). Registered on March 30, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L. Hall
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte Sanderson
- University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Beverly J. Brown
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Per Andrén
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sophie Bennett
- University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Liam R. Chamberlain
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - E. Bethan Davies
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kareem Khan
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Natalie Kouzoupi
- University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - David Mataix-Cols
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Caitlin McKenzie
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tara Murphy
- University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Mark Townsend
- National Institute for Health Research, University of Southampton, Alpha House, Enterprise Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Elizabeth Murray
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
French B, Daley D, Perez Vallejos E, Sayal K, Hall CL. Development and evaluation of an online education tool on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder for general practitioners: the important contribution of co-production. BMC Fam Pract 2020; 21:224. [PMID: 33131490 PMCID: PMC7604955 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01289-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is underdiagnosed in the UK and the assessment and diagnosis pathway often involves a general practitioner (GP) referral to secondary care services. GPs' levels of knowledge and understanding about ADHD is often a significant barrier in patients accessing care. The development of an online education resource could improve GPs knowledge of ADHD and optimise appropriate referrals. Involving end-users in co-creating interventions may enhance their clinical utility and impact routine clinical practice. However, there is limited published evidence describing how to meaningfully involve stakeholders in both the design and development components of co-production. METHOD We report a step wise, co-production approach towards developing an online ADHD education intervention for GPs. Preparatory work highlighted the relevant topics to be included in the intervention, from which educational videos were then developed. Workshops were then conducted with GPs, leading to further refinement of the video content and subsequently the final intervention. A pilot usability study (n = 10 GPs) was then conducted to assess the intervention's acceptability, feasibility and accessibility. RESULTS The development of the online intervention was greatly facilitated by the involvement of GPs. Having a co-production development process ensured the consistent adaptation of the intervention to meet GPs' needs. The usability study showed that the content of the intervention was suitable, easily accessible, engaging and delivered at an acceptable level of intensity, validating the development approach taken. CONCLUSION While further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the developed intervention, preliminary findings demonstrated that it was acceptable and well received. The importance of co-development was highlighted in developing an intervention that addresses specific needs for GPs. This development approach may be useful for other researchers and developers of clinical interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B French
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan (CANDAL), Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
| | - D Daley
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan (CANDAL), Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - E Perez Vallejos
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan (CANDAL), Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health and Technology, Nottingham, UK
| | - K Sayal
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan (CANDAL), Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - C L Hall
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Across the Lifespan (CANDAL), Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chamberlain LR, Hall CL, Andrén P, Davies EB, Kilgariff J, Kouzoupi N, Murphy T, Hollis C. Therapist-Supported Online Interventions for Children and Young People With Tic Disorders: Lessons Learned From a Randomized Controlled Trial and Considerations for Future Practice. JMIR Ment Health 2020; 7:e19600. [PMID: 33095180 PMCID: PMC7647804 DOI: 10.2196/19600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, research into internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) has suggested that therapist-guided digital interventions have greater engagement, adherence, and effectiveness than self-directed digital therapies. While research has focused on the effectiveness of, and adherence to, these interventions, less attention has been paid to their implementation in practice and what aspects of the therapist role support success. An understanding of the key factors related to the therapist role and intervention delivery is required if these iCBTs are to be applied in routine clinical care and outcomes optimized. In light of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is greater emphasis on allowing patients access to remote therapies. We report the experiences and reflections of 4 therapists and their 2 supervisors in delivering an online, therapist-supported intervention in a randomized controlled trial for children and young people with tic disorders (the Online Remote Behavioural Intervention for Tics [ORBIT] trial). Themes discussed include the importance of training, supervision, creating support documents/manuals, and record keeping. Alongside this are communication strategies used by therapists to encourage patient adherence and treatment effectiveness. These include rapport building, treatment personalization, and suggestions for overcoming non-engagement. These reflections offer important considerations for the delivery of iCBTs as well as implications associated with the implementation of these interventions in existing services and future research studies. We share thoughts on where iCBTs may sit in a stepped care model, how services may deal with comorbid conditions, and the potential role of iCBTs in collecting clinical data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam R Chamberlain
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Per Andrén
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Bethan Davies
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Kilgariff
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Natalia Kouzoupi
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tara Murphy
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Hollis
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.,Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sadan O, Singbartl K, Kraft J, Plancher JM, Greven ACM, Kandiah P, Pimentel C, Hall CL, Papangelou A, Asbury WH, Hanfelt JJ, Samuels O. Correction to: Low-chloride- versus high-chloride-containing hypertonic solution for the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage-related complications: The ACETatE (A low ChloriE hyperTonic solution for brain Edema) randomized trial. J Intensive Care 2020; 8:66. [PMID: 32922802 PMCID: PMC7460738 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-020-00485-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ofer Sadan
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Division of Neurocritical Care, Emory University Hospital and Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - Kai Singbartl
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 USA
| | - Jacqueline Kraft
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Division of Neurocritical Care, Emory University Hospital and Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - Joao McONeil Plancher
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Division of Neurocritical Care, Emory University Hospital and Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - Alexander C M Greven
- School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - Prem Kandiah
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Division of Neurocritical Care, Emory University Hospital and Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - Cederic Pimentel
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Division of Neurocritical Care, Emory University Hospital and Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - C L Hall
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Division of Neurocritical Care, Emory University Hospital and Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - Alexander Papangelou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University Hospital and Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - William H Asbury
- Department of Pharmacy, Emory University Hospital, 1364 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - John J Hanfelt
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - Owen Samuels
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Division of Neurocritical Care, Emory University Hospital and Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Valentine AZ, Brown BJ, Groom MJ, Young E, Hollis C, Hall CL. A systematic review evaluating the implementation of technologies to assess, monitor and treat neurodevelopmental disorders: A map of the current evidence. Clin Psychol Rev 2020; 80:101870. [PMID: 32712216 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Technology-based interventions provide an attractive option for improving service provision for neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), for example, widening access to interventions, objective assessment, and monitoring; however, it is unclear whether there is sufficient evidence to support their use in clinical settings. This review provides an evidence map describing how technology is implemented in the assessment/diagnosis and monitoring/ treatment of NDD (Prospero CRD42018091156). Using predefined search terms in six databases, 7982 articles were identified, 808 full-texts were screened, resulting in 47 included papers. These studies were appraised and synthesised according to the following outcomes of interest: effectiveness (clinical effectiveness/ service delivery efficiencies), economic impact, and user impact (acceptability/ feasibility). The findings describe how technology is currently being utilised clinically, highlights gaps in knowledge, and discusses future research needs. Technology has been used to facilitate assessment and treatment across multiple NDD, especially Autism Spectrum (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity (ADHD) disorders. Technologies include mobile apps/tablets, robots, gaming, computerised tests, videos, and virtual reality. The outcomes presented largely focus on the clinical effectiveness of the technology, with approximately half the papers demonstrating some degree of effectiveness, however, the methodological quality of many studies is limited. Further research should focus on randomised controlled trial designs with longer follow-up periods, incorporating an economic evaluation, as well as qualitative studies including process evaluations and user impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Althea Z Valentine
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Beverley J Brown
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Madeleine J Groom
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Emma Young
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Library and Knowledge Services, Duncan Macmillan House Staff Library, Porchester Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, South Block E Floor, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sanderson C, Kouzoupi N, Hall CL. Technology Matters: The human touch in a digital age - a blended approach in mental healthcare delivery with children and young people. Child Adolesc Ment Health 2020; 25:120-122. [PMID: 32307846 DOI: 10.1111/camh.12385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Online psychological interventions have the potential to address many current issues facing service provision in child and adolescent mental health, not least improving access to evidence-based therapies and providing greater patient choice. Recognising this, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) now recommend digitally delivered therapy in the treatment of depression in children and young people (CYP). However, despite the virtual ubiquity of technology in young people's lives, and good evidence that online treatments can be effective, there remain barriers to real-world implementation. We argue that remote therapist support and blended approaches to therapy will be important models in harnessing the potential of digital technology in CYP mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Sanderson
- Great Ormond Street Hospital/UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Natalia Kouzoupi
- Great Ormond Street Hospital/UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Khan K, Hollis C, Hall CL, Davies EB, Mataix-Cols D, Andrén P, Murphy T, Brown BJ, Murray E, Glazebrook C. Protocol for the Process Evaluation of the Online Remote Behavioural Intervention for Tics (ORBIT) randomized controlled trial for children and young people. Trials 2020; 21:6. [PMID: 31898510 PMCID: PMC6941346 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3974-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Process evaluations are an important component in the interpretation and understanding of outcomes in trials. The Online Remote Behavioural Intervention for Tics (ORBIT) study is a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of an Internet-delivered behavioural intervention (called BIP TIC) compared to an Internet-delivered education programme aimed at children and young people with tics. A process evaluation will be undertaken alongside the main trial to determine precisely how the behavioural intervention works and ascertain whether, and if so, how, the intervention could be successfully implemented in standard clinical practice. This protocol paper describes the rationale, aims, and methodology of the ORBIT trial process evaluation. METHODS The process evaluation will have a mixed-methods design following the UK Medical Research Council 2015 guidelines, comprising both quantitative and qualitative data collection. This will include analysing data usage of participants in the intervention arm; purposively sampled, semi-structured interviews of parents and children, therapists and supervisors, and referring clinicians of the ORBIT trial, as well as analysis of qualitative comments put into the online therapy platform by participants at the end of treatment. Qualitative data will be analysed thematically. Quantitative and qualitative data will be integrated in a triangulation approach, to provide an understanding of how the intervention works, and what resources are needed for effective implementation, uptake and use in routine clinical care. DISCUSSION This process evaluation will explore the experiences of participants, therapists and supervisors and referring clinicians of a complex online intervention. By contextualising trial efficacy results, this will help understand how and if the intervention worked and what may be required to sustain the implementation of the treatment long term. The findings will also aid in our understanding of factors that can affect the success of complex interventions. This will enable future researchers developing online behavioural interventions for children and young people with mental health and neurological disorders to gain invaluable information from this process evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number, ISRCTN70758207. Registered on 20 March 2018. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03483493. Registered on 30 March 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Khan
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
| | - C Hollis
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - C L Hall
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - E B Davies
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - D Mataix-Cols
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Andrén
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - T Murphy
- Tic Disorder Clinic, Psychological Medicine Team, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - B J Brown
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - E Murray
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - C Glazebrook
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
- NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hall CL, Zascavage RR, Sedlazeck FJ, Planz JV. Potential applications of nanopore sequencing for forensic analysis. Forensic Sci Rev 2020; 32:23-54. [PMID: 32007927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Advancements in DNA sequencing technologies are occurring at a rapid rate. Various platforms have proven useful in all aspects of health and science research, from molecular diagnostics in cancer research to spore identification in bioterrorism. In the field of forensics, one particular single-molecule sequencing platform shows promise for becoming a viable solution for small to midsize forensic laboratories. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) has developed a portable, nanopore-based sequencing instrument that has already been utilized for on-site identification of Zika and Ebola viruses, full genome sequencing, evaluation of DNA and RNA base modifications, and enrichment-free mitochondrial DNA analysis. The rapid development of this technology creates possibilities relevant to standard DNA sequencing, direct analysis of forensic samples, including blood, semen, and buccal swabs, mitochondrial DNA analysis, SNP and STR analysis, familial identification, and microbial identification for bioterrorism and geolocation. The small size of the platform, its low cost, and its requirement of only basic laboratory equipment makes this platform well suited for small laboratories wishing to begin developing expertise in sequence-based forensic analyses. Herein, we outline recent developments and applications of nanopore sequencing technologies and their potential application in forensic analysis. We address current and potential techniques in mitochondrial DNA analysis, SNP and STR typing, and microbial identification. Additionally, we discuss recent developments in library preparation and data analysis tool further streamlining the sequencing process that integrate workflows in laboratories or in remote field scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C L Hall
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Centre, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America
| | - R R Zascavage
- Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Texas at Arlington, Texas, United States of America
| | - F J Sedlazeck
- Human Genome Sequencing Centre, Baylor College of Medicine, United States of America
| | - J V Planz
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Centre, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hall CL, Gurha P, Sabater-Molina M, Asimaki A, Futema M, Lovering RC, Suárez MP, Aguilera B, Molina P, Zorio E, Coarfa C, Robertson MJ, Cheedipudi SM, Ng KE, Delaney P, Hernández JP, Pastor F, Gimeno JR, McKenna WJ, Marian AJ, Syrris P. RNA sequencing-based transcriptome profiling of cardiac tissue implicates novel putative disease mechanisms in FLNC-associated arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 2019; 302:124-130. [PMID: 31843279 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) encompasses a group of inherited cardiomyopathies including arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) whose molecular disease mechanism is associated with dysregulation of the canonical WNT signalling pathway. Recent evidence indicates that ARVC and ACM caused by pathogenic variants in the FLNC gene encoding filamin C, a major cardiac structural protein, may have different molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis. We sought to identify dysregulated biological pathways in FLNC-associated ACM. RNA was extracted from seven paraffin-embedded left ventricular tissue samples from deceased ACM patients carrying FLNC variants and sequenced. Transcript levels of 623 genes were upregulated and 486 genes were reduced in ACM in comparison to control samples. The cell adhesion pathway and ILK signalling were among the prominent dysregulated pathways in ACM. Consistent with these findings, transcript levels of cell adhesion genes JAM2, NEO1, VCAM1 and PTPRC were upregulated in ACM samples. Moreover, several actin-associated genes, including FLNC, VCL, PARVB and MYL7, were suppressed, suggesting dysregulation of the actin cytoskeleton. Analysis of the transcriptome for dysregulated biological pathways predicted activation of inflammation and apoptosis and suppression of oxidative phosphorylation and MTORC1 signalling in ACM. Our data suggests dysregulated cell adhesion and ILK signalling as novel putative pathogenic mechanisms of ACM caused by FLNC variants which are distinct from the postulated disease mechanism of classic ARVC caused by desmosomal gene mutations. This knowledge could help in the design of future gene therapy strategies which would target specific components of these pathways and potentially lead to novel treatments for ACM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L Hall
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Priyatansh Gurha
- Center for Cardiovascular Genetics, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, USA
| | - Maria Sabater-Molina
- Laboratorio de Cardiogenética, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria and Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Angeliki Asimaki
- Cardiology Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St Georges University of London, London, UK
| | - Marta Futema
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ruth C Lovering
- Functional Gene Annotation Group, Pre-clinical and Fundamental Science, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mari Paz Suárez
- Instituto Nacional de Toxicologia y Ciencias Forenses de Madrid (INTCF), Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Aguilera
- Instituto Nacional de Toxicologia y Ciencias Forenses de Madrid (INTCF), Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar Molina
- Department of Pathology at the Instituto de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses de Valencia (IMLCF-Valencia), Histology Unit at the Universitat de València, and Research Group on Inherited Heart Diseases, Sudden Death and Mechanisms of Disease (CaFaMuSMe) from the Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Esther Zorio
- Cardiology Department at Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Research Group on Inherited Heart Diseases, Sudden Death and Mechanisms of Disease (CaFaMuSMe) from the Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Center for Biomedical Network Research on Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Sirisha M Cheedipudi
- Center for Cardiovascular Genetics, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, USA
| | - Keat-Eng Ng
- William Harvey Heart Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Paul Delaney
- William Harvey Heart Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Francisco Pastor
- Servicio de Anatomía Patológica del Hospital Reina Sofía, Murcia, Spain
| | - Juan R Gimeno
- Servicio de Cardiologia del Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca and Departamento de Medicina Interna de la Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain; Center for Biomedical Network Research on Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - William J McKenna
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ali J Marian
- Center for Cardiovascular Genetics, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, USA
| | - Petros Syrris
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Khan K, Hall CL, Davies EB, Hollis C, Glazebrook C. The Effectiveness of Web-Based Interventions Delivered to Children and Young People With Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e13478. [PMID: 31682573 PMCID: PMC6858614 DOI: 10.2196/13478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of certain neurodevelopmental disorders, specifically autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), has been increasing over the last four decades. Nonpharmacological interventions are available that can improve outcomes and reduce associated symptoms such as anxiety, but these are often difficult to access. Children and young people are using the internet and digital technology at higher rates than any other demographic, but although Web-based interventions have the potential to improve health outcomes in those with long-term conditions, no previous reviews have investigated the effectiveness of Web-based interventions delivered to children and young people with neurodevelopmental disorders. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to review the effectiveness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Web-based interventions delivered to children and young people with neurodevelopmental disorders. METHODS Six databases and one trial register were searched in August and September 2018. RCTs were included if they were published in a peer-reviewed journal. Interventions were included if they (1) aimed to improve the diagnostic symptomology of the targeted neurodevelopmental disorder or associated psychological symptoms as measured by a valid and reliable outcome measure; (2) were delivered on the Web; (3) targeted a youth population (aged ≤18 years or reported a mean age of ≤18 years) with a diagnosis or suspected diagnosis of a neurodevelopmental disorder. Methodological quality was rated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for RCTs. RESULTS Of 5140 studies retrieved, 10 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Half of the interventions were delivered to children and young people with ASDs with the other five targeting ADHD, tic disorder, dyscalculia, and specific learning disorder. In total, 6 of the 10 trials found that a Web-based intervention was effective in improving condition-specific outcomes or reducing comorbid psychological symptoms in children and young people. The 4 trials that failed to find an effect were all delivered by apps. The meta-analysis was conducted on five of the trials and did not show a significant effect, with a high level of heterogeneity detected (n=182 [33.4%, 182/545], 5 RCTs; pooled standardized mean difference=-0.39; 95% CI -0.98 to 0.20; Z=-1.29; P=.19 [I2=72%; P=.006]). CONCLUSIONS Web-based interventions can be effective in reducing symptoms in children and young people with neurodevelopmental disorders; however, caution should be taken when interpreting these findings owing to methodological limitations, the minimal number of papers retrieved, and small samples of included studies. Overall, the number of studies was small and mainly limited to ASD, thus restricting the generalizability of the findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42018108824; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018108824.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kareem Khan
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - E Bethan Davies
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.,NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Hollis
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.,NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Cris Glazebrook
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.,NIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hall CL, Akhtar MM, Sabater-Molina M, Futema M, Asimaki A, Protonotarios A, Dalageorgou C, Pittman AM, Suarez MP, Aguilera B, Molina P, Zorio E, Hernández JP, Pastor F, Gimeno JR, Syrris P, McKenna WJ. Filamin C variants are associated with a distinctive clinical and immunohistochemical arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy phenotype. Int J Cardiol 2019; 307:101-108. [PMID: 31627847 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pathogenic variants in the filamin C (FLNC) gene are associated with inherited cardiomyopathies including dilated cardiomyopathy with an arrhythmogenic phenotype. We evaluated FLNC variants in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) and investigated the disease mechanism at a molecular level. METHODS 120 gene-elusive ACM patients who fulfilled diagnostic criteria for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) were screened by whole exome sequencing. Fixed cardiac tissue from FLNC variant carriers who had died suddenly was investigated by histology and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS Novel or rare FLNC variants, four null and five variants of unknown significance, were identified in nine ACM probands (7.5%). In FLNC null variant carriers (including family members, n = 16) Task Force diagnostic electrocardiogram repolarization/depolarization abnormalities were uncommon (19%), echocardiography was normal in 69%, while 56% had >500 ventricular ectopics/24 h or ventricular tachycardia on Holter and 67% had late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). Ten gene positive individuals (63%) had abnormalities on ECG or CMRI that are not included in the current diagnostic criteria for ARVC. Immunohistochemistry showed altered key protein distribution, distinctive from that observed in ARVC, predominantly in the left ventricle. CONCLUSIONS ACM associated with FLNC variants presents with a distinctive phenotype characterized by Holter arrhythmia and LGE on CMRI with unremarkable ECG and echocardiographic findings. Clinical presentation in asymptomatic mutation carriers at risk of sudden death may include abnormalities which are currently non-diagnostic for ARVC. At the molecular level, the pathogenic mechanism related to FLNC appears different to classic forms of ARVC caused by desmosomal mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L Hall
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mohammed M Akhtar
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Maria Sabater-Molina
- Laboratorio de Cardiogenética, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria and Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Marta Futema
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Angeliki Asimaki
- Cardiology Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St Georges University of London, London, UK
| | - Alexandros Protonotarios
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Chrysoula Dalageorgou
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alan M Pittman
- Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St Georges University of London, London, UK
| | - Mari Paz Suarez
- Instituto Nacional de Toxicologia y Ciencias Forenses de Madrid (INTCF), Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Aguilera
- Instituto Nacional de Toxicologia y Ciencias Forenses de Madrid (INTCF), Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar Molina
- Department of Pathology at the Instituto de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses de Valencia (IMLCF-Valencia), Histology Unit at the Universitat de València, Research Group on Inherited Heart Diseases, Sudden Death and Mechanisms of Disease (CaFaMuSMe) from the Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Esther Zorio
- Cardiology Department at Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Research Group on Inherited Heart Diseases, Sudden Death and Mechanisms of Disease (CaFaMuSMe) from the Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Francisco Pastor
- Servicio de Cardiologia del Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca and Departamento de Medicina Interna de la Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Juan R Gimeno
- Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Petros Syrris
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
| | - William J McKenna
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Krinzinger H, Hall CL, Groom MJ, Ansari MT, Banaschewski T, Buitelaar JK, Carucci S, Coghill D, Danckaerts M, Dittmann RW, Falissard B, Garas P, Inglis SK, Kovshoff H, Kochhar P, McCarthy S, Nagy P, Neubert A, Roberts S, Sayal K, Sonuga-Barke E, Wong ICK, Xia J, Zuddas A, Hollis C, Konrad K, Liddle EB. Neurological and psychiatric adverse effects of long-term methylphenidate treatment in ADHD: A map of the current evidence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2019; 107:945-968. [PMID: 31545988 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Methylphenidate (MPH), the most common medication for children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in many countries, is often prescribed for long periods of time. Any long-term psychotropic treatment in childhood raises concerns about possible adverse neurological and psychiatric outcomes. We aimed to map current evidence regarding neurological and psychiatric outcomes, adverse or beneficial, of long-term MPH (> 1 year) treatment in ADHD. We coded studies using a "traffic light" system: Green: safe/favours MPH; Amber: warrants caution; Red: not safe/not well-tolerated. Un-categorisable study findings were coded as "Unclear". Although some evidence suggests an elevated risk of psychosis and tics, case reports describe remission on discontinuation. Several studies suggest that long-term MPH may reduce depression and suicide in ADHD. Evidence suggests caution in specific groups including pre-school children, those with tics, and adolescents at risk for substance misuse. We identified a need for more studies that make use of large longitudinal databases, focus on specific neuropsychiatric outcomes, and compare outcomes from long-term MPH treatment with outcomes following shorter or no pharmacological intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helga Krinzinger
- Section Child Neuropsychology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Madeleine J Groom
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Mohammed T Ansari
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada
| | - Tobias Banaschewski
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jan K Buitelaar
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Centre, & Karakter Child and Adolescent Psychiatry University Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sara Carucci
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Biomedical Science, University of Cagliari & "A. Cao" Pediatric Hospital, Brotzu Hospital Trust, Cagliari, Italy
| | - David Coghill
- Departments of Paediatrics and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Division of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Marina Danckaerts
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Psychiatric Center, Leuven, KU, Belgium; Department of Neurosciences, University Psychiatric Center, Leuven, KU, Belgium
| | - Ralf W Dittmann
- Paediatric Psychopharmacology, Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Bruno Falissard
- University Paris-Sud, Univ. Paris-Descartes, AP-HP, INSERM U1178, Paris, France
| | - Peter Garas
- Semmelweis University, Károly Rácz School of PhD Studies, Mental Health Sciences Phd School, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Sarah K Inglis
- Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Hanna Kovshoff
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Puja Kochhar
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Peter Nagy
- Vadaskert Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Antje Neubert
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescents Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Kapil Sayal
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Edmund Sonuga-Barke
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Experimental Clinical & Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ian C K Wong
- Centre for Paediatric Pharmacy Research, Research Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK; Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Jun Xia
- The Nottingham Ningbo GRADE Center, Nottingham China Health Institute, The University of Nottingham Ningbo, China
| | - Alessandro Zuddas
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Biomedical Science, University of Cagliari & "A. Cao" Pediatric Hospital, Brotzu Hospital Trust, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Chris Hollis
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, UK; National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) MindTech MedTech Cooperative, Nottingham, UK; NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kerstin Konrad
- Section Child Neuropsychology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen, Germany; JARA-BRAIN Institute II, Molecular Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH and RWTH Aachen University, Germany
| | - Elizabeth B Liddle
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hall CL, Brown S, James M, Martin JL, Brown N, Selby K, Clarke J, Williams L, Sayal K, Hollis C, Groom MJ. Consensus workshops on the development of an ADHD medication management protocol using QbTest: developing a clinical trial protocol with multidisciplinary stakeholders. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019; 19:126. [PMID: 31215440 PMCID: PMC6582552 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0772-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study design and protocol that underpin a randomised controlled trial (RCT) are critical for the ultimate success of the trial. Although RCTs are considered the gold standard for research, there are multiple threats to their validity such as participant recruitment and retention, identifying a meaningful change, and non-adherence to the protocol. For clinical RCTs, involving patients and clinicians in protocol design provides the opportunity to develop research protocols that are meaningful to their target audience and may help overcome some of the inherent threats in conducting RCTs. However, the majority of protocols do not describe the methodology underpinning their development, limiting the amount of learned experience shared between research groups. METHOD With the purpose of reporting a collaborative approach towards developing a protocol, we present the findings from three sequential workshops that were conducted with the aim of developing a protocol to investigate the feasibility of adding a computerised test of attention, impulsivity and activity (QbTest) to medication management of children and young people with Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Based on previous qualitative interviews with clinicians and families, each workshop prioritised topics for focused discussion. Information from the workshops was fed back to the participants for reflection in advance of the next workshop. RESULTS The workshops involved 21 multi-disciplinary ADHD experts, including clinicians, patient and public involvement (PPI) members, parents of young people with ADHD and researchers. The consensus workshops addressed key research issues such as: the most relevant outcome measures/ resource drivers; methods and time points for data collection; and the clinical protocol for utilising the QbTest, including when best to use this within the medication management process. The resulting protocol details a feasibility RCT design describing these factors. CONCLUSION Protocols which are co-developed may help overcome some of the risks associated with RCT completion (e.g. recruitment, retention, protocol adherence) and help prioritise outcomes of greater relevance to the populations under study. The methodology has potential value for researchers and organisations developing clinical guidelines, and offers insights into the valuable impact of PPI upon trial design. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03368573, 11th December 2017 (retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L. Hall
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - Susan Brown
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - Marilyn James
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jennifer L. Martin
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - Nikki Brown
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - Kim Selby
- Department of Community Paediatrics, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Kent, UK
| | - Julie Clarke
- Acting Consultant Community Paediatrics, Grantham and District Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Grantham, UK
| | - Laura Williams
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - Kapil Sayal
- Child and Adolescent, Developmental Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and CANDAL (Centre for ADHD and Neuro-developmental Disorders across the Lifespan), Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- Devlopmental Psychiatry Queens Medical Centre, School of Medicine, and MindTech, Institute of Mental, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - Madeleine J. Groom
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
The Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale (SNAP-IV) is a widely used scale that measures the core symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, there are contradictory findings regarding factor structure. Factor structure and measurement equivalence/invariance analysis on parent and teacher SNAP-IV for children referred for an ADHD assessment (N = 250; 6-17 years), revealed a two-factor structure provided the best fit. SNAP-IV scores were also compared with clinician diagnosis of ADHD and research diagnoses of ADHD and hyperkinetic disorder. Parent ratings of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity were good predictors of research but not clinician diagnosis. For teacher ratings, only hyperactivity/impulsivity scores were associated with research and clinician diagnosis. SNAP-IV scores showed high sensitivity but low specificity to clinician diagnosis. The SNAP-IV is a valid outcome measure for use in randomized controlled trials and clinical settings, and is best used as a screening rather than a diagnostic tool for ADHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L Hall
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Boliang Guo
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Althea Z Valentine
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Madeline J Groom
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Daley
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kapil Sayal
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hollis C, Hall CL, Guo B, James M, Boadu J, Groom MJ, Brown N, Kaylor-Hughes C, Moldavsky M, Valentine AZ, Walker GM, Daley D, Sayal K, Morriss R. The impact of a computerised test of attention and activity (QbTest) on diagnostic decision-making in children and young people with suspected attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2018; 59:1298-1308. [PMID: 29700813 PMCID: PMC6124643 DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) relies on subjective methods which can lead to diagnostic uncertainty and delay. This trial evaluated the impact of providing a computerised test of attention and activity (QbTest) report on the speed and accuracy of diagnostic decision-making in children with suspected ADHD. METHODS Randomised, parallel, single-blind controlled trial in mental health and community paediatric clinics in England. Participants were 6-17 years-old and referred for ADHD diagnostic assessment; all underwent assessment-as-usual, plus QbTest. Participants and their clinician were randomised to either receive the QbTest report immediately (QbOpen group) or the report was withheld (QbBlind group). The primary outcome was number of consultations until a diagnostic decision confirming/excluding ADHD within 6-months from baseline. Health economic cost-effectiveness and cost utility analysis was conducted. Assessing QbTest Utility in ADHD: A Randomised Controlled Trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02209116). RESULTS One hundred and thirty-two participants were randomised to QbOpen group (123 analysed) and 135 to QbBlind group (127 analysed). Clinicians with access to the QbTest report (QbOpen) were more likely to reach a diagnostic decision about ADHD (hazard ratio 1.44, 95% CI 1.04-2.01). At 6-months, 76% of those with a QbTest report had received a diagnostic decision, compared with 50% without. QbTest reduced appointment length by 15% (time ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.93), increased clinicians' confidence in their diagnostic decisions (odds ratio 1.77, 95% CI 1.09-2.89) and doubled the likelihood of excluding ADHD. There was no difference in diagnostic accuracy. Health economic analysis showed a position of strict dominance; however, cost savings were small suggesting that the impact of providing the QbTest report within this trial can best be viewed as 'cost neutral'. CONCLUSIONS QbTest may increase the efficiency of ADHD assessment pathway allowing greater patient throughput with clinicians reaching diagnostic decisions faster without compromising diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Hollis
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Boliang Guo
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Marilyn James
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, B132 Queens Medical Centre, University Of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Janet Boadu
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, B132 Queens Medical Centre, University Of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Madeleine J Groom
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Nikki Brown
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Catherine Kaylor-Hughes
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Maria Moldavsky
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, West Nottinghamshire Community Team, Mansfield, UK
| | - Althea Z Valentine
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Gemma M Walker
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Daley
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kapil Sayal
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Richard Morriss
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Schwartz AD, Hall CL, Barney LE, Babbitt CC, Peyton SR. Integrin α 6 and EGFR signaling converge at mechanosensitive calpain 2. Biomaterials 2018; 178:73-82. [PMID: 29909039 PMCID: PMC6211197 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 05/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Cells sense and respond to mechanical cues from the extracellular matrix (ECM) via integrins. ECM stiffness is known to enhance integrin clustering and response to epidermal growth factor (EGF), but we lack information on when or if these mechanosensitive growth factor receptors and integrins converge intracellularly. Towards closing this knowledge gap, we combined a biomaterial platform with transcriptomics, molecular biology, and functional assays to link integrin-mediated mechanosensing and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling. We found that high integrin α6 expression controlled breast cancer cell adhesion and motility on soft, laminin-coated substrates, and this mimicked the response of cells to EGF stimulation. The mechanisms that drove both mechanosensitive cell adhesion and motility converged on calpain 2, an intracellular protease important for talin cleavage and focal adhesion turnover. EGF stimulation enhanced adhesion and motility on soft substrates, but required integrin α6 and calpain 2 signaling. In sum, we identified a new role for integrin α6 mechanosensing in breast cancer, wherein cell adhesion to laminin on soft substrates mimicked EGF stimulation. We identified calpain 2, downstream of both integrin α6 engagement and EGFR phosphorylation, as a common intracellular signaling node, and implicate integrin α6 and calpain 2 as potential targets to inhibit the migration of cancer cells in stiff tumor environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Schwartz
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA
| | - C L Hall
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA
| | - L E Barney
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA
| | - C C Babbitt
- Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA
| | - S R Peyton
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hall CL, Sutanto H, Dalageorgou C, McKenna WJ, Syrris P, Futema M. Frequency of genetic variants associated with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy in the genome aggregation database. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 26:1312-1318. [PMID: 29802319 PMCID: PMC6117313 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0169-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Revised: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a rare inherited heart-muscle disorder, which is the most common cause of life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young adults and athletes. Early and accurate diagnosis can be crucial in effective ARVC management and prevention of SCD.The genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) population of 138,632 unrelated individuals was searched for previously identified ARVC variants, classified as pathogenic or unknown on the disease genetic variant database ( http://www.arvcdatabase.info/ ), in five most-commonly mutated genes: PKP2, DSP, DSG2, DSC2 and JUP, where variants account for 40-50% of all the ARVC cases. Minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.001 was used to define variants as rare or common.The gnomAD data contained 117/364 (32%) of the previously reported pathogenic and 152/266 (57%) of the unknown ARVC variants. The cross-ethnic analysis of MAF revealed that 11 previously classified pathogenic and 57 unknown variants were common (MAF ≥ 0.001) in at least one ethnic gnomAD population and therefore unlikely to be ARVC causing.After applying our MAF analysis the overall frequency of pathogenic ARVC variants in gnomAD was one in 257 individuals, but a more stringent cut-off (MAF ≥ 0.0001) gave a frequency of one in 845, closer to the estimated phenotypic frequency of the disease.Our study demonstrates that the analysis of large cross-ethnic population sequencing data can significantly improve disease variant interpretation. Higher than expected frequency of ARVC variants suggests that a proportion of ARVC-causing variants may be inaccurately classified, implying reduced penetrance of some variants, and/or a polygenic aetiology of ARVC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L Hall
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Henry Sutanto
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Chrysoula Dalageorgou
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - William John McKenna
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Petros Syrris
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marta Futema
- Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Affiliation(s)
- M Cobby
- Department of Medicine, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hall CL, James M, Brown S, Martin JL, Brown N, Selby K, Clarke J, Vijayan H, Guo B, Sayal K, Hollis C, Groom MJ. Protocol investigating the clinical utility of an objective measure of attention, impulsivity and activity (QbTest) for optimising medication management in children and young people with ADHD 'QbTest Utility for Optimising Treatment in ADHD' (QUOTA): a feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021104. [PMID: 29453304 PMCID: PMC5829926 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterised by symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity. To improve outcomes, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence ADHD guidelines recommend regular monitoring of symptoms when children commence medication. However, research suggests that routine monitoring rarely happens, and clinicians often rely on subjective information such as reports from parents and teachers to ascertain improvement. These sources can be unreliable and difficult to obtain. The addition of an objective test of attention and activity (QbTest) may improve the objectivity, reliability and speed of clinical decision-making and so reduce the time to identify the optimal medication dose. This study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a QbTest medication management protocol delivered in routine healthcare services for children with ADHD. METHOD AND ANALYSIS This multisite feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) will recruit 60 young people (aged 6-17 years old), diagnosed with ADHD, and starting stimulant medication who are seen by Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services or Community Paediatric services. Participants will be randomised into one of two arms. In the experimental arm (QbTest protocol), the participant will complete a QbTest at baseline (prior to medication initiation), and two follow-up QbTests on medication (2-4 weeks and 8-10 weeks later). In the control arm, participants will receive treatment as usual, with at least two follow-up consultations. Measures of parent-, teacher- and clinician-rated symptoms and global functioning will be completed at each time point. Health economic measures will be completed. Clinicians will record treatment decision-making. Acceptability and feasibility of the protocol will be assessed alongside outcome measure completion rates. Qualitative interviews will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The findings will be used to inform the development of a fully powered RCT. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. The study has ethical approval. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03368573; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L Hall
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Marilyn James
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sue Brown
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jennifer L Martin
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Nikki Brown
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kim Selby
- Department of Community Paediatrics, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Kent, UK
| | - Julie Clarke
- Grantham and District Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Grantham, UK
| | - Hena Vijayan
- North East London NHS Foundation Trust, Acorn Centre, Romford, UK
| | - Boliang Guo
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kapil Sayal
- Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Madeleine J Groom
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hall CL, Valentine AZ, Walker GM, Ball HM, Cogger H, Daley D, Groom MJ, Sayal K, Hollis C. Study of user experience of an objective test (QbTest) to aid ADHD assessment and medication management: a multi-methods approach. BMC Psychiatry 2017; 17:66. [PMID: 28183284 PMCID: PMC5301349 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1222-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnosis and monitoring of Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) typically relies on subjective reports and observations. Objective continuous performance tests (CPTs) have been incorporated into some services to support clinical decision making. However, the feasibility and acceptability of adding such a test into routine practice is unknown. The study aimed to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of adding an objective computerised test to the routine assessment and monitoring of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians (n = 10) and families (parents/young people, n = 20) who participated in a randomised controlled trial. Additionally, the same clinicians (n = 10) and families (n = 76) completed a survey assessing their experience of the QbTest. The study took place in child and adolescent mental health and community paediatric clinics across the UK. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed. RESULTS Interviewed clinicians and families valued the QbTest for providing an objective, valid assessment of symptoms. The QbTest was noted to facilitate communication between clinicians, families and schools. However, whereas clinicians were more unanimous on the usefulness of the QbTest, survey findings showed that, although the majority of families found the test useful, less than half felt the QbTest helped them understand the clinician's decision making around diagnosis and medication. The QbTest was seen as a potentially valuable tool to use early in the assessment process to streamline the care pathway. Although clinicians were conscious of the additional costs, these could be offset by reductions in time to diagnosis and the delivery of the test by a Healthcare Assistant. CONCLUSIONS The findings indicate the QbTest is an acceptable and feasible tool to implement in routine clinical settings. Clinicians should be mindful to discuss the QbTest results with families to enable their understanding and engagement with the process. Further findings from definitive trials are required to understand the cost/benefit; however, the findings from this study support the feasibility and acceptability of integrating QbTest in the ADHD care pathway. TRIAL REGISTRATION The findings form the implementation component of the Assessing QbTest Utility in ADHD (AQUA) Trial which is registered with the ISRCTN registry ( ISRCTN11727351 , retrospectively registered 04 July 2016) and clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02209116 , registered 04 August 2014).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L. Hall
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC-EM, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - Althea Z. Valentine
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC-EM, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - Gemma M. Walker
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC-EM, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - Harriet M. Ball
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC-EM, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - Heather Cogger
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC-EM, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - David Daley
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham & Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders across the Lifespan (CANDAL), Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - Madeleine J. Groom
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC-EM, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - Kapil Sayal
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham & Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders across the Lifespan (CANDAL), Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- Centre for ADHD and Neuro-developmental Disorders across the Lifespan (CANDAL), & MindTech, Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Groom MJ, Young Z, Hall CL, Gillott A, Hollis C. The incremental validity of a computerised assessment added to clinical rating scales to differentiate adult ADHD from autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatry Res 2016; 243:168-73. [PMID: 27400220 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2015] [Revised: 06/23/2016] [Accepted: 06/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
There is a clinical need for objective evidence-based measures that are sensitive and specific to ADHD when compared with other neurodevelopmental disorders. This study evaluated the incremental validity of adding an objective measure of activity and computerised cognitive assessment to clinical rating scales to differentiate adult ADHD from Autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Adults with ADHD (n=33) or ASD (n=25) performed the QbTest, comprising a Continuous Performance Test with motion-tracker to record physical activity. QbTest parameters measuring inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity were combined to provide a summary score ('QbTotal'). Binary stepwise logistic regression measured the probability of assignment to the ADHD or ASD group based on scores on the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale-subscale E (CAARS-E) and Autism Quotient (AQ10) in the first step and then QbTotal added in the second step. The model fit was significant at step 1 (CAARS-E, AQ10) with good group classification accuracy. These predictors were retained and QbTotal was added, resulting in a significant improvement in model fit and group classification accuracy. All predictors were significant. ROC curves indicated superior specificity of QbTotal. The findings present preliminary evidence that adding QbTest to clinical rating scales may improve the differentiation of ADHD and ASD in adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine J Groom
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Zoe Young
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK; NIHR MindTech Healthcare Technology Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health and Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK; CLAHRC-EM, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK.
| | - Alinda Gillott
- Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Service, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK; CLAHRC-EM, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK; NIHR MindTech Healthcare Technology Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health and Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hall CL, Selby K, Guo B, Valentine AZ, Walker GM, Hollis C. Innovations in Practice: an objective measure of attention, impulsivity and activity reduces time to confirm attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis in children - a completed audit cycle. Child Adolesc Ment Health 2016; 21:175-178. [PMID: 32680350 DOI: 10.1111/camh.12140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosing attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and young people typically relies on clinical observation and subjective parent, teacher and self-reports. The subjective nature of reports combined with contradictory or missing data can result in diagnostic uncertainty and delay. The aim of this study was to assess whether the addition of an objective test of attention, impulsivity and activity (QbTest) as an adjunct to standard ADHD assessment could accelerate the diagnostic process in routine National Health Service (NHS) settings. METHOD In a pre vs. post-test audit design, case records were examined in 40 cases diagnosed without the QbTest [pre-QbTest group] and 40 cases diagnosed with the QbTest [QbTest group], recording the number of consultations until a confirmed ADHD diagnosis was reached. RESULTS Using Poisson regression, significantly fewer clinician consultations (mean 2.18 vs. 3.05; p < .02) were required to confirm the diagnosis of ADHD when the QbTest was used to augment assessment in comparison to standard assessment as usual. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that the addition of the QbTest to standard clinical assessment may reduce time to diagnosis and potentially result in cost savings to the NHS. These preliminary data suggest that there is a potentially clinically meaningful benefit of adding the QbTest to routine clinical ADHD assessment and this should be examined next in the context of a randomised controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L Hall
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kim Selby
- Department of Community Paediatrics, Medway Maritime Hospital, Kent, UK
| | - Boliang Guo
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Althea Z Valentine
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Gemma M Walker
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Developmental Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hall CL, Valentine AZ, Groom MJ, Walker GM, Sayal K, Daley D, Hollis C. The clinical utility of the continuous performance test and objective measures of activity for diagnosing and monitoring ADHD in children: a systematic review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2016; 25:677-99. [PMID: 26620873 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-015-0798-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2015] [Accepted: 11/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is typically diagnosed using clinical observation and subjective informant reports. Once children commence ADHD medication, robust monitoring is required to detect partial or non-responses. The extent to which neuropsychological continuous performance tests (CPTs) and objective measures of activity can clinically aid the assessment and titration process in ADHD is not fully understood. This review describes the current evidence base for the use of CPTs and objectively measured activity to support the diagnostic procedure and medication management for children with ADHD. Four databases (PsycINFO, Medline, Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), and PsycARTICLES) were systematically searched to understand the current evidence base for (1) the use of CPTs to aid clinical assessment of ADHD; (2) the use of CPTs to aid medication management; and (3) the clinical utility of objective measures of activity in ADHD. Sixty relevant articles were identified. The search revealed six commercially available CPTs that had been reported on for their clinical use. There were mixed findings with regard to the use of CPTs to assess and manage medication, with contrasting evidence on their ability to support clinical decision-making. There was a strong evidence base for the use of objective measures of activity to aid ADHD/non-ADHD group differentiation, which appears sensitive to medication effects and would also benefit from further research on their clinical utility. The findings suggest that combining CPTs and an objective measure of activity may be particularly useful as a clinical tool and worthy of further pursuit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L Hall
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC-EM, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
| | - Althea Z Valentine
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC-EM, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Madeleine J Groom
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Gemma M Walker
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC-EM, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Kapil Sayal
- Developmental Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neuro-developmental Disorders Across the Lifespan (CANDAL), Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - David Daley
- Centre for ADHD and Neuro-developmental Disorders Across the Lifespan (CANDAL), Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC-EM, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
- Centre for ADHD and Neuro-developmental Disorders Across the Lifespan (CANDAL), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- MindTech, Developmental Psychiatry, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| |
Collapse
|