Colistin plus meropenem combination is synergistic in vitro against extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including high-risk clones

Antimicrobial combination effects against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains: A cross-sectional study

Background and Aims

Emergence of multidrug resistance in non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli is a threat to public health. Combination therapy is a strategy for the treatment of antibiotic-resistant infections.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 63 nonduplicate clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were collected from various specimens. Identification of bacterial isolates was performed by phenotypic and molecular tests. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns and detection of β-lactamase genes were determined using the broth microdilution and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques, respectively. Then, the combined effects analysis was determined by the checkerboard method. Based on the status of resistance to carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem), 25 isolates of each genus were selected for further investigation.

Results

For A. baumannii, bla OXA-23, bla OXA-58, and bla OXA-48 genes were positive in 21 (84%), 17 (68%), and 11 (44%) of isolates, respectively. In P. aeruginosa isolates, bla VIM was the most common gene (44%) and other genes including bla IMP, bla NDM, and bla OXA-23 were found in nine (36%), six (24%), and three (12%) isolates, respectively. Meropenem (MER)-tigecycline (TIG) had a significant synergistic effect against 20 (80%) A. baumannii (p value < 0.001). This combination was also efficient against 5 (20%) P. aeruginosa isolates. Moreover, the other combination, tigecycline-amikacin (TIG-AMK) was effective against 10 (40%) A. baumannii isolates. The combination of colistin (COL) and MER showed a significant synergistic effect against 21 (84%) A. baumannii (p value < 0.001) and 17 (68%) P. aeruginosa isolates (p value < 0.001).

Conclusion

The MER-TIG and COL-MER combinations are promising options against resistant bacteria. Our study could be helpful for the development of a new treatment recommendation.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam alone or in combination with polymyxin B against carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Nosocomial infection caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-A. baumannii) has become a challenge in clinical practice. Acting as the last resort antibacterial agents for the treatment of CR-A. baumannii infection, polymyxins have high risk of nephrotoxicity and poor clinical efficacy. Ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam are three β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination complexes that newly approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infection. In this study, we analyzed the in vitro activity of those novel antibacterial agents alone or in combination with polymyxin B against the CR-A. baumannii obtained from a Chinese tertiary hospital. Our results suggest that those novel antibacterial agents should not be used alone for the treatment of CR-A. baumannii infection, as they cannot prevent the regrowth of bacteria at the clinical achievable blood concentration. Imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam should not be used as the substitutes of imipenem and meropenem for polymyxin B based combination therapy against CR-A. baumannii, since they have no edge over imipenem and meropenem on antibacterial activity when in combination with polymyxin B. Ceftazidime/avibactam may be more suitable than ceftazidime for polymyxin B based combination therapy against CR-A. baumannii, as it has a higher synergistic rate with polymyxin B, and the antibacterial activity of ceftazidime/avibactam is much higher than that of ceftazidime when tested in combination with polymyxin B. Ceftazidime/avibactam may also be the better choice than imipenem and meropenem for polymyxin B based combination therapy against CR-A. baumannii, as it has a higher synergistic rate with polymyxin B.

Synergetic dual antibiotics-loaded chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol) nanofibers with sustained antibacterial delivery for treatment of XDR bacteria-infected wounds

Resistance of bacterial pathogens to conventional antibiotics has remained a significant challenge in managing post-wound infections, especially in developing countries. Here, a nanofibrous chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol) (CS/PVA) mat was designed for controlled delivery of three different concentrations of two antibiotics (colistin/meropenem ratio of 32/64 μg/ml (AB1), 64/128 μg/ml (AB2), and 128/256 (AB3) μg/ml) with synergistic antibacterial activity against ATCC and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates. The scaffolds showed a uniform fibrous structure with no bead formation with a sustained release of the antibiotics for one week. The elongation at break, wettability, porosity, and average fiber diameter decreased with increased antibiotics concentrations. Young's modulus and tensile strength showed a significant increase after adding antibiotics. All the constructs showed excellent in vitro cytocompatibility for fibroblasts and biocompatibility in an animal model. The antibacterial assays confirmed the dose-dependent antibacterial activity of the CS/PVA. The scaffolds loaded with AB2 and AB3 showed biocidal properties against ATCC, while only CS/PVA/AB3 had antibacterial activity against XDR clinical isolates. This study suggests the CS/PVA/AB3 nanofibrous scaffold contained 128/256 μg/ml colistin/meropenem as an excellent antibacterial wound dressing for protection of skin wounds from XDR clinical isolates and now promises to proceed with pre-clinical investigations.

Efficacy of Amikacin and Meropenem on Colistin-Induced Klebsiella pneumoniae Persisters

Colistin-based antibiotic therapies have been recommended for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections. During colistin treatment, persister cells that tolerate antibiotics may arise. Here we designed an in vitro study to assess the killing activity of colistin, meropenem, and amikacin on colistin-induced K. pneumoniae persisters in comparison with starvation-induced persisters. Colistin-induced persisters were generated under exposure to 10 × minimum inhibitory concentration dose of colistin, whereas starvation-induced persisters were produced by limitation of nutrients. In colistin-induced persisters, amikacin totally inhibited cell growth in 6 hours, whereas 98% of the cell population was inhibited by meropenem, and total eradication with meropenem was observed after 24 hours. Both antibiotics also inhibited metabolic activity >88%. The lack of killing effect under colistin exposure suggested to us that these cells could protect themselves from further colistin stress. There was no significant permeabilization change in the cellular membrane with all antibiotics. There was no killing effect on starvation-induced persister cells with the exposure to all antibiotics. In 6 hours, the metabolic activity of the persisters with meropenem and colistin increased 99% and 40%, respectively, whereas there was no increase with amikacin. The sustained inhibition with amikacin was an important finding for antipersister effect of amikacin. Amikacin had rapid and sustained antipersister activity on colistin-induced persister cells. During the colistin treatment of K. pneumoniae infection, the addition of amikacin to the regimen seems to be an effective approach to prevent a recurrence.

Effectiveness and Nephrotoxicity of Loading Dose Colistin-Meropenem versus Loading Dose Colistin-Imipenem in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infection

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is becoming more widely recognized as a serious cause of nosocomial infections, and colistin has been reintroduced in recent years for the treatment of CRAB infection. Combinations of colistin and meropenem or imipenem have been found to be effective against CRAB isolates, whereas clinical investigations have not definitively demonstrated the theoretical benefits of colistin combined therapy in patients with CRAB infections. The objective of this study was to compare the primary outcome (30-day survival rate) and secondary outcomes (clinical response, microbiological response and nephrotoxicity) between patients who received loading dose (LD) colistin−meropenem and LD colistin−imipenem for the treatment of CRAB infection. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed at Chiang Mai University Hospital in patients with CRAB infection who received LD colistin−meropenem or LD colistin−imipenem between 2011 and 2017, and 379 patients fulfilled the requirements for the inclusion criteria. The results of this study showed that patients who received LD colistin−imipenem had a lower 30-day survival rate (adjusted HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.37−0.90; p = 0.015) and a lower clinical response (aHR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35−0.90; p = 0.017) compared with those who received LD colistin−meropenem. The microbiological response in patients with LD colistin−imipenem was 0.52 times (aHR) lower than that in those who received colistin−meropenem (95% CI: 0.34−0.81; p = 0.004); however, there was no significant difference in nephrotoxicity (aHR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.67−1.57; p = 0.897) between the two combination regimens. In conclusion, when comparing the combination of LD colistin with imipenem or meropenem, the combination of LD colistin and meropenem provides a better survival rate for treating CRAB. Thus, we suggest that combinations of LD colistin and meropenem should be considered when treating CRAB infections.

The Efficacy of Using Combination Therapy against Multi-Drug and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Clinical Settings

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative bacterium which is capable of developing a high level of antibiotic resistance. It has been placed on the WHO's critical priority pathogen list and it is commonly found in ventilator-associated pneumonia infections, blood stream infections and other largely hospital-acquired illnesses. These infections are difficult to effectively treat due to their increasing antibiotic resistance and as such patients are often treated with antibiotic combination regimens.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search with screening criteria using the Ovid search engine and the Embase, Ovid Medline, and APA PsycInfo databases.

RESULTS

It was found that in many cases the combination therapies were able to match or outperform the monotherapies and none performed noticeably worse than the monotherapies. However, the clinical studies were mostly small, only a few were prospective randomized clinical trials and statistical significance was lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that combination therapies have a place in the treatment of these highly resistant bacteria and, in some cases, there is some evidence to suggest that they provide a more effective treatment than monotherapies.

Analyses of the response of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa against monotherapy and combined therapy using quantum dots and proteomics

Carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA) has become a serious public health problem and the biofilm formation aggravates this problem. The study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of β-lactamases and quorum sensing (QS) genes in CRPA isolates, analyze production of biofilm, evaluate the response against meropenem (MPM) and∕or polymyxin B (POL B) and its association with azythromicin (AZT) using quantum dots (QDs) and proteomic analysis. Six CRPA isolates were analyzed. β-lactamases and QS genes were search using specific PCRs and were tested for biofilm production by quantitative technique. A CRPA isolate, containing blaKPC gene and biofilm-producing, was selected to assess its response to therapy using QDs and the MALDI-TOF. The β-lactamase detected was blaKPC in 66.7% of the isolates. All isolates were biofilm producers and carriers of the QS genes. QDs-MPM conjugates triggered the formation of biofilm and the association with AZT inhibited this effect. Proteomics analysis showed that treatments with MPM or POL B suppressed the expression of the transglycosylase protein, while combined therapy with AZT induced expression of the RpoN protein. Thus, this study shows that the use of fluorescence combined with the proteomics analysis was promising to understand how a CRPA strain reacts to antimicrobial treatment.

Control of extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa co-harboring metallo-β-lactamase enzymes with oprD gene downregulation

PURPOSE

to study control and treatment of infection with extensive drug-resistant carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (XDR-CRPA).

METHODS

Eleven Pseudomonas aeruginosa (XDR-CRPA) strains used in this study were isolated from a clinical sample, identified, and antibiotics susceptibility recorded in a previous study. Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was performed to determine the expression level of the OprD gene. Besides, a checkerboard technique was performed to assess the effect of polymyxin-B (POX), colistin (COL), rifampicin (RIF), imipenem (IPM), and meropenem (MEM) during 2 and 3- dimensional antibiotic combinations. Further, the time-kill study was determined for the most potent combination against four representative strains, log₁₀ changes of viable cell counts were expressed as their mean value (±SD) values.

RESULTS

Molecular analysis by Real-time PCR revealed that the diminished expression level of OprD mRNA was overwhelming to various degrees. The checkerboard method demonstrated that the relevant synergism was achieved in 90.9% of strains for both carbapenem antibiotics during the triple combinations. While an additive effect was noted for all the dual regimen assays. Regarding time-kill experiments, a remarkable bactericidal effect with [99.9% killing rate] was observed toward only one strain whilst a bacteriostatic attitude was proven with ≥95% bacterial eradication against the three remaining strains.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings underscore the promising implications of these combinations for treatment against XDR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa even they are resistant to carbapenems due to multiple mechanisms of action.

Time-Kill Evaluation of Antibiotic Combinations Containing Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Their Potential Role against Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant Isolates

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) has emerged as a promising solution to the lack of new antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Data from in vitro assays of CZA combinations, however, are scarce. The objective of our study was to perform a time-kill analysis of the effectiveness of CZA alone and in combination with other antibiotics against a collection of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa isolates. Twenty-one previously characterized representative XDR P. aeruginosa isolates were selected. Antibiotic susceptibility was tested by broth microdilution, and results were interpreted using CLSI criteria. The time-kill experiments were performed in duplicate for each isolate. Antibiotics were tested at clinically achievable free-drug concentrations. Different treatment options, including CZA alone and combined with amikacin, aztreonam, meropenem, and colistin, were evaluated to identify the most effective combinations. Seven isolates were resistant to CZA (MIC ≥ 16/4 mg/liter), including four metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-carrying isolates and two class A carbapenemases. Five of them were resistant or intermediate to aztreonam (MIC ≥ 16 mg/liter). Three isolates were resistant to amikacin (MIC ≥ 64 mg/liter) and one to colistin (MIC ≥ 4 mg/liter). CZA monotherapy had a bactericidal effect in 100% (14/14) of the CZA-susceptible isolates. Combination therapies achieved a greater overall reduction in bacterial load than monotherapy for the CZA-resistant isolates. CZA plus colistin was additive or synergistic in 100% (7/7) of the CZA-resistant isolates, while CZA plus amikacin and CZA plus aztreonam were additive or synergistic in 85%. CZA combined with colistin, amikacin, or aztreonam was more effective than monotherapy against XDR P. aeruginosa isolates. A CZA combination could be useful for treating XDR P. aeruginosa infections, including those caused by CZA-resistant isolates.

IMPORTANCE The emergence of resistance to antibiotics is a serious public health problem worldwide and can be a cause of mortality. For this reason, antibiotic treatment is compromised, and we have few therapeutic options to treat infections. The main goal of our study is to search for new treatment options for infections caused by difficult-to-treat resistant germs. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative bacterium distributed throughout the world with the ability to become resistant to most available antibiotics. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) emerged as a promising solution to the lack of new antibiotics against infections caused by P. aeruginosa strains. This study intended to analyze the effect of CZA alone or in combination with other available antibiotics against P. aeruginosa strains. The combination of CZA with other antibiotics could be more effective than monotherapy against extensively drug-resistant P. aeruginosa strains.

Rapid evolution and host immunity drive the rise and fall of carbapenem resistance during an acute Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection

It is well established that antibiotic treatment selects for resistance, but the dynamics of this process during infections are poorly understood. Here we map the responses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to treatment in high definition during a lung infection of a single ICU patient. Host immunity and antibiotic therapy with meropenem suppressed P. aeruginosa, but a second wave of infection emerged due to the growth of oprD and wbpM meropenem resistant mutants that evolved in situ. Selection then led to a loss of resistance by decreasing the prevalence of low fitness oprD mutants, increasing the frequency of high fitness mutants lacking the MexAB-OprM efflux pump, and decreasing the copy number of a multidrug resistance plasmid. Ultimately, host immunity suppressed wbpM mutants with high meropenem resistance and fitness. Our study highlights how natural selection and host immunity interact to drive both the rapid rise, and fall, of resistance during infection.

A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), an important nosocomial pathogen, occurs particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU). Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of documented treatment with colistin monotherapy versus colistin plus meropenem in critically ill patients with CRAB infections at Chiang Mai University Hospital (CMUH). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients with CRAB infections in an ICU from 2015 to 2017, who received colistin monotherapy versus colistin plus meropenem. After propensity score matching, an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of a 30-day mortality rate in patients who received colistin plus meropenem was 0.43 compared to those who received colistin monotherapy (95% CI, 0.23–0.82, p = 0.01). aORs of clinical response and microbiological response were also higher in patients who received colistin plus meropenem (1.81, 95% CI 1.01–3.26, p = 0.048 and 2.08, 95% CI 1.11–3.91, p = 0.023, respectively). There was no significant difference in nephrotoxicity (aOR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.43–1.36, p = 0.363) between colistin monotherapy and colistin plus meropenem. In conclusion, the addition of meropenem to colistin caused a reduction in 30-day mortality, higher clinical and microbiological responses, and did not increase nephrotoxicity compared to colistin monotherapy. Furthermore, 30-day mortality was significantly related with age, receiving vasopressor, having malignancy, and the APACHE II score.

Efficacy of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in Combination with Colistin against Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Including High-Risk Clones, in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model

Combination therapy is an attractive therapeutic option for extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Colistin has been the only treatment available for these infections for many years, but its results are suboptimal. Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a newly available therapeutic option that has shown good antipseudomonal activity, even against a number of XDR P. aeruginosa strains. However, data about combinations containing C/T are scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze the activity of C/T and colistin alone and in combination against a collection of XDR P. aeruginosa strains containing 24 representative clinical isolates from a multicentre Spanish study. Twenty-four time-kill experiments performed over 24 h were conducted in duplicate to determine the effects of colistin and C/T alone and combined. An in vitro pharmacodynamic chemostat model then was used to validate this combination against three selected XDR P. aeruginosa ST175 isolates with different susceptibility levels to C/T. Static time-kill assays demonstrated superior synergistic or additive effect for C/T plus colistin against 21 of the 24 isolates studied. In the in vitro dynamic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model, the C/T regimen of 2/1 g every 8 h with a steady-state concentration of 2 mg/liter colistin effectively suppressed the bacterial growth at 24 h. Additive or synergistic interactions were observed for C/T plus colistin against XDR P. aeruginosa strains and particularly against C/T-resistant strains. C/T plus colistin may be a useful treatment for XDR P. aeruginosa infections, including those caused by high risk-clones resistant to C/T.

Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in Children

Carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) are a major global public health threat. Enterobacterales hydrolyze almost all β-lactams through carbapenemase production. Infections caused by CRO are challenging to treat due to the limited number of antimicrobial options. This leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Over the last few years, several new antibiotics effective against CRO have been approved. Some of them (e.g., plazomicin or imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam) are currently approved for use only by adults; others (e.g., ceftazidime-avibactam) have recently been approved for use by children. Recommendations for antibiotic therapy of CRO infections in pediatric patients are based on evidence mainly from adult studies. The availability of pediatric pharmacokinetic and safety data is the cornerstone to broaden the use of proposed agents in adults to the pediatric population. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current knowledge regarding infections caused by CRO with a focus on children, which includes epidemiology, risk factors, outcomes, and antimicrobial therapy management, with particular attention being given to new antibiotics.

Risk Factors for Mortality among Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections: What Is the Influence of XDR Phenotype on Outcomes?

This study aimed to assess the impact of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotype on mortality in Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia. A retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary hospital from January 2000 to December 2018. All consecutive prospectively recorded P. aeruginosa bacteremia in adult patients were assessed. In this study, 382 patients were included, of which 122 (31.9%) due to XDR P. aeruginosa. Independent factors associated with 14-day mortality were as follows: high-risk source of bacteremia (hazard ratio (HR) 3.07, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.73–5.46), septic shock (HR 1.75, 95% CI, 1.12–2.75), and higher Pitt scores (one-point increments; HR 1.25, 95% CI, 1.12–1.38). Otherwise, the appropriateness of definitive antibiotic therapy was a protective factor (HR 0.39, 95% CI, 0.24–0.62). The same variables were also associated with 30-day mortality. XDR phenotype was not associated with 14- or 30-day mortality. In a subanalysis considering only high-risk source cases, combined antimicrobial therapy was independently associated with 14-day favorable outcome (HR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.33–0.93). In conclusion, XDR phenotype was not associated with poor prognosis in patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia in our cohort. However, source of infection, clinical severity, and inappropriate definitive antibiotic therapy were risk factors for mortality. Combined antimicrobial therapy should be considered for high-risk sources.

Colistin Plus Carbapenem versus Colistin Monotherapy in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia

Purpose

Colistin alone may not be sufficient for treating carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB); thus, efforts are needed to increase treatment success rates. We compared the effects of colistin plus carbapenem therapy versus colistin monotherapy in treating pneumonia caused by CRAB and attempted to identify specific populations or factors that could benefit from combination therapy.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data on cases of CRAB pneumonia. The patients were divided into colistin plus carbapenem therapy and colistin monotherapy groups. The primary outcome was 14-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, clinical improvement at days 2 and 14, and microbiological improvement at day 14.

Results

Of 160 cases meeting criteria for CRAB pneumonia, 83 (52%) and 77 (48.0%) were treated with carbapenem combination therapy or colistin monotherapy, respectively. Among these patients, 50 (63.3%) in the combination group and 27 (39.7%) in the monotherapy group had Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores >24 points (p=0.010). Overall, there was no significant difference in 14-day mortality between the combination and monotherapy groups (24.1% vs 20.8%, p=0.616). Clinical improvement and sputum-negative conversion also showed no significant difference. After adjusting for disease severity according to APACHE II score, the 14-day mortality was significantly lower in the combination group than in the monotherapy group among patients with APACHE II scores of 25–29 points (9.1% vs 53.8%, P=0.020).

Conclusion

Despite more severe conditions, compared with colistin monotherapy, colistin plus carbapenem combination therapy showed equivalent primary mortality outcome in treating CRAB pneumonia. Combination therapy was more effective in patients with APACHE II score ranging from 25 to 29 points.

In vitro and in vivo assessment of the antibacterial activity of colistin alone and in combination with other antibiotics against Acinetobacter baumannii and Escherichia coli

OBJECTIVES

Limited therapeutic options exist for treating severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). In this study, the activity of colistin (COL) as monotherapy and in combination with other antibiotics against Acinetobacter baumannii in vitro was investigated. In addition, the efficacy of intravenous colistimethate sodium (CMS) was evaluated in a murine model of urinary tract infection (UTI) induced by MDR Escherichia coli.

METHODS

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), Monte Carlo simulation, fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI), time-kill study and erythrocyte lysis assay were applied to evaluate the effect and cytotoxicity of COL, meropenem, imipenem, doripenem (DOR) and sulbactam alone and in combination. For the in vivo experiment, determination of the bacterial burden and histopathological examination were performed to evaluate the efficacy of CMS against UTI.

RESULTS

Of 106 A. baumannii isolates, 104 (98.1%) were susceptible to COL. In the chequerboard assay, COL + DOR showed the highest rate of synergism (60%). No antagonism or cytotoxicity was observed. All COL-based combinations were able to inhibit or slow bacterial re-growth in a time-kill assay. In an in vivo activity study, intravenous CMS reduced not only the bacterial load but also inflammation and maintained structural integrity of infected bladders and kidneys.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of COL alone in vitro and in vivo suggested that intravenous CMS will be an effective and available therapeutic strategy for UTI due to MDR-GNB. In-depth in vitro tests demonstrated that COL + DOR could be an attractive option, especially when the COL MIC is ≥1 μg/mL.