1
|
Rousseau F, Ranchon F, Bardin C, Bakrin N, Lavoué V, Bengrine-Lefevre L, Falandry C. Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next? Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231192397. [PMID: 37724138 PMCID: PMC10505350 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231192397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, major advances have been made toward the individualization of epithelial ovarian cancer care, leading to an overall improvement of patient outcomes. However, real-life data indicate that the oldest populations do not benefit from this, due to aspects related to cancer (more aggressive histopathological features), treatment (i.e. frequently suboptimal), and the host (increased toxicities in patients with lower physiological reserve). A specific risk-benefit perspective should therefore be taken when considering surgery, chemotherapy, and maintenance treatments: the decision for cytoreductive surgery should include geriatric vulnerability and surgical complexity, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy being an option when primary surgery appears at high risk; carboplatin paclitaxel association remains the standard even in vulnerable older patients; and bevacizumab and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors maintenance are interesting options provided they are prescribed according to their indications with a close monitoring of their toxicities. Future studies should aim to individualize care without limiting access of older patients to innovation. A specific focus is needed on age-specific translational analyses (focusing on tumor mutational burden and impaired biological pathways), a better patient stratification according to geriatric parameters, an adaptation of both oncological treatment and geriatric interventions, and treatment adaptations not a priori but according to formal pharmacokinetic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédérique Rousseau
- Institut Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
- Société Francophone d'OncoGériatrie (SOFOG)
- Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO)
| | - Florence Ranchon
- Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Unité de Pharmacie Clinique Oncologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
- CICLY Centre pour l’Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon, Oullins, France
- Société Française de Pharmacie Oncologique (SFPO)
| | - Christophe Bardin
- Service de Pharmacie Clinique, Hôpital Cochin AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Société Française de Pharmacie Oncologique (SFPO)
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Hôpital Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite Cedex, France
- Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO)
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- Service de Gynécologie, CHU de Rennes, Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France
- UMR S1085, IRSET-INSERM, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France
- Groupe Français de chirurgie Oncologique et Gynécologique (FRANCOGYN)
| | - Leila Bengrine-Lefevre
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
- Société Francophone d'OncoGériatrie (SOFOG)
- Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO)
| | - Claire Falandry
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Unité de Gériatrie, Centre Hospitalier de la Croix Rousse, 103, Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon 69004, France
- Université de Lyon, CarMeN Laboratory, INSERM U.1060/Université Lyon 1/INRA U1397/INSA Lyon/Hospices Civils Lyon Bâtiment CENS-ELI 2D; Hôpital Lyon Sud Secteur 2; Pierre-Bénite 69310, France
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Pierre-Bénite 69310, France Société Francophone d'OncoGériatrie (SOFOG)
- Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leung B, Shokoohi A, Al-Hashami Z, Moore S, Pender A, Wong SK, Wang Y, Wu J, Ho C. Improved uptake and survival with systemic treatments for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: younger versus older adults. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:360. [PMID: 37076834 PMCID: PMC10114445 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10800-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the past decade, there has been increasing availability of novel therapeutics with improved tolerability and efficacy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study goals were: to compare the uptake of systemic therapy (ST) before and after the availability of targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immunotherapy and to examine the changes in overall survival (OS) over time between younger and older adults with advanced NSCLC. METHODS All patients with advanced NSCLC referred to British Columbia (BC) Cancer in 2009, 2011, 2015 and 2017 were included. One-year time points were based on molecular testing implementation and funded drug availability: baseline (2009), epidermal growth factor receptor TKI (2011), anaplastic lymphoma kinase TKI (2015) and Programed Death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (2017). Age groups were <70years and ≥70years. Baseline demographics, simplified comorbidity scores (SCS), disease characteristics, and ST details were collected retrospectively. Variables were compared using X2, Fisher's exact tests and logistic-regression analysis. OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS 3325 patients were identified. Baseline characteristics were compared between ages < 70 years and ≥ 70 years for each time cohort with significant differences noted in baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and SCS. The rate of ST delivery trended upwards over time with age <70 years: 2009 44%, 2011 53%, 2015 50% and 2017 52% and age ≥70 years: 22%, 25%, 28% and 29% respectively. Predictors for decreased use of ST for age <70 years: ECOG ≥2, SCS ≥9, year 2011, and smoking history; and age ≥70 years: ECOG ≥2, years 2011 and 2015, and smoking history. The median OS of patients who received ST improved from 2009 to 2017: age <70 years 9.1 m vs. 15.5 m and age ≥70 years 11.4 m vs. 15.0 m. CONCLUSIONS There was an increased uptake of ST for both age groups with the introduction of novel therapeutics. Although a smaller proportion of older adults received ST, those who received treatment had comparable OS to their young counterpart. The benefit of ST in both age groups was seen across the different types of treatments. With careful assessment and selection of appropriate candidates, older adults with advanced NSCLC appear to benefit from ST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonnie Leung
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver Centre, 600 10th Avenue West, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E6, Canada.
| | - Aria Shokoohi
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Zamzam Al-Hashami
- Department of Medicine, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Center, Muscat, Oman
| | - Sara Moore
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Selina K Wong
- University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver Centre, 600 10th Avenue West, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E6, Canada
- University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jonn Wu
- University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Cheryl Ho
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver Centre, 600 10th Avenue West, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E6, Canada
- University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sabatier R, Rousseau F, Joly F, Cropet C, Montégut C, Frindte J, Cinieri S, Guerra Alía EM, Polterauer S, Yoshida H, Vergote I, Colombo N, Hietanen S, Largillier R, Canzler U, Gratet A, Marmé F, Favier L, Pujade-Lauraine E, Ray-Coquard I. Efficacy and safety of maintenance olaparib and bevacizumab in ovarian cancer patients aged ≥65 years from the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial. Eur J Cancer 2023; 181:42-52. [PMID: 36634389 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 study (NCT02477644) showed that addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. We evaluated maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in older patients in PAOLA-1. METHODS Baseline clinical and molecular data, and PFS, were compared between older (aged ≥65 years) and younger patients (<65 years). Factors associated with olaparib efficacy, and safety in age subgroups, were also assessed. RESULTS Of 806 randomised patients, 292 (36.2%) were ≥65 years. A lower proportion of older versus younger patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (61.0% versus 76.2%) and upfront surgery (42.0% versus 55.7%). Older patients were less likely to have a BRCA1/2 mutation (17.1% versus 36.7%) or homologous recombination deficiency-positive status (34.1% versus 55.7%). After median follow-up of 22.1 months, median PFS was 21.6 months with olaparib versus 16.6 months with placebo in the older population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.75), comparable with the younger population (median 22.9 versus 16.9 months; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.77). PFS benefits were observed in patients with a BRCA mutation or homologous recombination deficiency-positive tumours. Incidence of olaparib-related grade ≥3 adverse events in older patients was comparable with that of younger patients (36.8% versus 31.7%) although hypertension and anaemia were more common in older patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred in older patients receiving olaparib. CONCLUSION Older patients enrolled in PAOLA-1 achieved similar PFS benefits compared with younger patients, with a similar safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renaud Sabatier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Aix-Marseille Univ, Inserm, CNRS, Marseille, and GINECO, France.
| | - Frédérique Rousseau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Aix-Marseille Univ, Inserm, CNRS, Marseille, and GINECO, France
| | | | | | - Coline Montégut
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Aix-Marseille Univ, Inserm, CNRS, Marseille, and GINECO, France
| | - Johanna Frindte
- Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, and AGO, Germany
| | - Saverio Cinieri
- UOC Oncologia Medica - Ospedale Senatore Antonio Perrino, Brindisi, and MITO, Italy
| | | | - Stephan Polterauer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, and AGO-Austria, Austria
| | | | - Ignace Vergote
- University Hospital Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, and BGOG, European Union, Belgium
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- University of Milan-Bicocca and Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, and MANGO, Italy
| | | | | | - Ulrich Canzler
- Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, and AGO, Germany
| | | | - Frederik Marmé
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, and AGO, Germany
| | - Laure Favier
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, and GINECO, France
| | | | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Centre Léon Bérard and University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon and GINECO, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maiorano BA, Maiorano MFP, Lorusso D, Di Maio M, Maiello E. Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:ijgc-2022-003614. [PMID: 36229080 PMCID: PMC9664098 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown to be effective as maintenance treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Although most ovarian cancers develop after age 65, older patients are often under-represented in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors versus placebo as maintenance therapy in older patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane databases, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) meeting abstracts, for randomized clinical trials using maintenance with PARP inhibitors in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, up to June 30, 2021. The measured outcomes were progression-free survival and safety (number and grade of adverse events), stratified by age (cut-off point: 65 years). RESULTS A total of eight phase III trials were selected. Among the 4364 patients, 1435 (32.9%) were aged ≥65 (919 receiving PARP inhibitors, 516 receiving placebo). Compared with placebo, maintenance with PARP inhibitors improved progression-free survival in older patients (HR=0.54; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.65; p<0.00001). No differences were found in progression-free survival in comparison with a younger population (HR=0.47; p=0.13). Only hematologic adverse events were available for the age subgroups, and no differences emerged for all-grade hematologic adverse events (risk ratio (RR)=1.22, p=0.33 for anemia; RR=0.97, p=0.74 for neutropenia) and severe neutropenia (RR=0.97, p=0.86); old women were at lower risk of severe anemia (RR=0.79, p=0.04) but had a higher risk of severe thrombocytopenia (RR=1.27, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Maintenance with PARP inhibitors prolongs progression-free survival compared with placebo, both as monotherapy and combined with chemotherapy or bevacizumab, in older patients with advanced ovarian cancer (high-quality evidence). Hematologic safety is similar to that seen in younger patients. No overall survival data are available at this time. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021261039.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigida Anna Maiorano
- Oncology Unit, Foundation Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
- Translational Medicine and Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Francesco Pio Maiorano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Foundation Policlinic "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Scientific Directorate, Foundation Policlinic "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Evaristo Maiello
- Oncology Unit, Foundation Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
André L, Antherieu G, Boinet A, Bret J, Gilbert T, Boulahssass R, Falandry C. Oncological Treatment-Related Fatigue in Oncogeriatrics: A Scoping Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102470. [PMID: 35626074 PMCID: PMC9139887 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Fatigue in older patients has multiple etiologies, as this symptom may be cancer-related, treatment-related, age-related, or part of frailty syndrome. Physicians need to identify this symptom and understand its risk factors but also evaluate the risk/benefit ratio of cancer treatments considering the risk of impairing the patient’s quality of life. This scoping review was aimed to present the level of information currently available on any-grade fatigue and grade 3 or more fatigue for each cancer treatment regimen, either in general or in older populations, for the most prevalent tumors. Abstract Fatigue is a highly prevalent symptom in both cancer patients and the older population, and it contributes to quality-of-life impairment. Cancer treatment-related fatigue should thus be included in the risk/benefit assessment when introducing any treatment, but tools are lacking to a priori estimate such risk. This scoping review was designed to report the current evidence regarding the frequency of fatigue for the different treatment regimens proposed for the main cancer indications, with a specific focus on age-specific data, for the following tumors: breast, ovary, prostate, urothelium, colon, lung and lymphoma. Fatigue was most frequently reported using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) versions 3 to 5. A total of 324 regimens were analyzed; data on fatigue were available for 217 (67%) of them, and data specific to older patients were available for 35 (11%) of them; recent pivotal trials have generally reported more fatigue grades than older studies, illustrating increasing concern over time. This scoping review presents an easy-to-understand summary that is expected to provide helpful information for shared decisions with patients regarding the anticipation and prevention of fatigue during each cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise André
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Geriatrics Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69230 Saint Genis-Laval, France; (L.A.); (G.A.); (A.B.); (J.B.); (T.G.)
| | - Gabriel Antherieu
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Geriatrics Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69230 Saint Genis-Laval, France; (L.A.); (G.A.); (A.B.); (J.B.); (T.G.)
| | - Amélie Boinet
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Geriatrics Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69230 Saint Genis-Laval, France; (L.A.); (G.A.); (A.B.); (J.B.); (T.G.)
| | - Judith Bret
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Geriatrics Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69230 Saint Genis-Laval, France; (L.A.); (G.A.); (A.B.); (J.B.); (T.G.)
| | - Thomas Gilbert
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Geriatrics Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69230 Saint Genis-Laval, France; (L.A.); (G.A.); (A.B.); (J.B.); (T.G.)
- Research on Healthcare Professionals and Performance RESHAPE, Inserm U1290, Lyon 1 University, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Rabia Boulahssass
- Geriatric Coordination Unit for Geriatric Oncology (UCOG) PACA Est CHU de Nice, 06000 Nice, France;
- FHU OncoAge, 06000 Nice, France
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Nice Sofia Antilpolis, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Claire Falandry
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Geriatrics Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69230 Saint Genis-Laval, France; (L.A.); (G.A.); (A.B.); (J.B.); (T.G.)
- FHU OncoAge, 06000 Nice, France
- CarMeN Laboratory, INSERM U.1060/Université Lyon1/INRA U. 1397/INSA Lyon/Hospices Civils Lyon, Bâtiment CENS-ELI 2D, Hôpital Lyon Sud Secteur 2, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France
- UCOGIR—Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Ouest–Guyane, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
- Faculty of Medicine and Maieutics Charles Mérieux, Lyon 1 University, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-478-863-287
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Multi-Disciplinary Care Planning of Ovarian Cancer in Older Patients: General Statement-A Position Paper from SOFOG-GINECO-FRANCOGYN-SFPO. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051295. [PMID: 35267603 PMCID: PMC8909025 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This position paper aims to provide practitioners a proposal for multidisciplinary care planning for older patients with ovarian cancer from the time of suspected diagnosis. The first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer involves several interdependent sequences: cytoreductive surgery, (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and maintenance targeted treatments. In older patients, care planning must be adapted to their geriatric parameters and consider the geriatric impact of each treatment sequence to allow treatment completion. Care planning should be centered on patient motivation and imply multidisciplinarity. Each step of treatment plan should be reconsidered in light of a geriatric assessment and follow-up. Studies are needed to prospectively evaluate the impact of geriatric vulnerability parameters at each step of the treatment agenda and the impact of geriatric interventions on patient outcomes. Abstract In this position paper the Société Francophone d’OncoGériatrie (SOFOG; French-speaking oncogeriatric society), the Société Française de Pharmacie Oncologique (SFPO, French society for oncology pharmacy), the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO, National Investigators’ Group for Studies in Ovarian and Breast Cancer) and the Groupe Français de chirurgie Oncologique et Gynécologique (FRANCOGYN) propose a multi-disciplinary care planning of ovarian cancer in older patients. The treatment pathway is based on four successive decisional nodes (diagnosis, resectability assessment, operability assessment, adjuvant, and maintenance treatment decision) implying multidisciplinarity and adaptation of the treatment plan according to the patient’s geriatric covariates and her motivation towards treatment. Specific attention must be paid to geriatric intervention, supportive care and pharmaceutical conciliation. Studies are needed to prospectively evaluate the impact of geriatric vulnerability parameters at each step of the treatment agenda and the impact of geriatric interventions on patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
7
|
Narita S, Hatakeyama S, Sakamoto S, Kato T, Inokuchi J, Matsui Y, Kitamura H, Nishiyama H, Habuchi T. Management of prostate cancer in older patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:513-525. [PMID: 35217872 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of prostate cancer among older men has increased in many countries, including Asian countries. However, older patients are ineligible for inclusion in large randomized trials, and the existing guidelines for the management of patients with prostate cancer do not provide specific treatment recommendations for older men. Therefore, generation of evidence for older patients with prostate cancer is a key imperative. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology has produced and updated several guidelines for management of prostate cancer in older men since 2010. Regarding localized prostate cancer, both surgery and radiotherapy are considered as feasible treatment options for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer even in older men, whereas watchful waiting and active surveillance are useful options for a proportion of these patients. With regard to advanced disease, androgen-receptor axis targets and taxane chemotherapy are standard treatment modalities, although dose modification and prevention of adverse events need to be considered. Management strategy for older patients with prostate cancer should take cognizance of not only the chronological age but also psychological and physical condition, socio-economic status and patient preferences. Geriatric assessment and patient-reported health-related quality of life are important tools for assessing health status of older patients with prostate cancer; however, there is a paucity of evidence of the impact of these tools on the clinical outcomes. Personalized management according to the patient's health status and tumour characteristics as well as socio-economic condition may be necessary for treatment of older patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shintaro Narita
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Shinichi Sakamoto
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takuma Kato
- Department of Urology, Kagawa University School of Medicine, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Juichi Inokuchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Matsui
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kitamura
- Department of Urology, University of Toyama Faculty of Medicine, Toyama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Tsukuba University School of Medicine, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Carleton N, Nasrazadani A, Gade K, Beriwal S, Barry PN, Brufsky AM, Bhargava R, Berg WA, Zuley ML, van Londen GJ, Marroquin OC, Thull DL, Mai PL, Diego EJ, Lotze MT, Oesterreich S, McAuliffe PF, Lee AV. Personalising therapy for early-stage oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in older women. THE LANCET. HEALTHY LONGEVITY 2022; 3:e54-e66. [PMID: 35047868 PMCID: PMC8765742 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(21)00280-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Age is one of the most important risk factors for the development of breast cancer. Nearly a third of all breast cancer cases occur in older women (aged ≥70 years), with most cases being oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+). Such tumours are often indolent and unlikely to be the ultimate cause of death for older women, particularly when considering other comorbidities. This Review focuses on unique clinical considerations for screening, detection, and treatment regimens for older women who develop ER+ breast cancers-specifically, we focus on recent trends for de-implementation of screening, staging, surgery, and adjuvant therapies along the continuum of care. Additionally, we also review emerging basic and translational research that will further uncover the unique underlying biology of these tumours, which develop in the context of systemic age-related inflammation and changing hormone profiles. With prevailing trends of clinical de-implementation, new insights into mechanistic biology might provide an opportunity for precision medicine approaches to treat patients with well tolerated, low-toxicity agents to extend patients' lives with a higher quality of life, prevent tumour recurrences, and reduce cancer-related burdens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Carleton
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Azadeh Nasrazadani
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Kristine Gade
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Parul N Barry
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Adam M Brufsky
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Rohit Bhargava
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Wendie A Berg
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Margarita L Zuley
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - G J van Londen
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Oscar C Marroquin
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Darcy L Thull
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Phuong L Mai
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Emilia J Diego
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Michael T Lotze
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Steffi Oesterreich
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Priscilla F McAuliffe
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| | - Adrian V Lee
- (N Carleton BS, Prof S Oesterreich PhD, P F McAuliffe MD, Prof A V Lee PhD) (S Beriwal MD, P N Barry MD), (N Carleton, Prof S Oesterreich, P F McAuliffe, Prof A V Lee); (A Nasrazadani MD, K Gade MD, Prof A M Brufksy MD, G J van Londen MD), (Prof R Bhargava MD), (D L Thull MS, P L Mai MD), (E J Diego MD, Prof M T Lotze MD, P F McAuliffe), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof M T Lotze), (Prof S Oesterreich, Prof A V Lee), (Prof W A Berg MD, Prof M L Zuley MD); (O C Marroquin MD)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yordanova M, Hubert A, Hassan S. Expanding the Use of PARP Inhibitors as Monotherapy and in Combination in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:1270. [PMID: 34959671 PMCID: PMC8709256 DOI: 10.3390/ph14121270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, and is known to be associated with a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are targeted therapeutics that have demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy in metastatic BRCA-mutant (BRCAMUT) TNBC patients. Improved efficacy of PARPi has been demonstrated in BRCAMUT breast cancer patients who have either received fewer lines of chemotherapy or in chemotherapy-naïve patients in the metastatic, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant settings. Moreover, recent trials in smaller cohorts have identified anti-tumor activity of PARPi in TNBC patients, regardless of BRCA-mutation status. While there have been concerns regarding the efficacy and toxicity of the use of PARPi in combination with chemotherapy, these challenges can be mitigated with careful attention to PARPi dosing strategies. To better identify a patient subpopulation that will best respond to PARPi, several genomic biomarkers of homologous recombination deficiency have been tested. However, gene expression signatures associated with PARPi response can integrate different pathways in addition to homologous recombination deficiency and can be implemented in the clinic more readily. Taken together, PARPi have great potential for use in TNBC patients beyond BRCAMUT status, both as a single-agent and in combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariya Yordanova
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada;
| | - Audrey Hubert
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3T5, Canada;
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), l’Institut de Cancer de Montreal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Saima Hassan
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3T5, Canada;
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), l’Institut de Cancer de Montreal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pathogenesis and Potential Therapeutic Targets for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13122978. [PMID: 34198652 PMCID: PMC8232221 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13122978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous tumor characterized by early recurrence, high invasion, and poor prognosis. Currently, its treatment includes chemotherapy, which shows a suboptimal efficacy. However, with the increasing studies on TNBC subtypes and tumor molecular biology, great progress has been made in targeted therapy for TNBC. The new developments in the treatment of breast cancer include targeted therapy, which has the advantages of accurate positioning, high efficiency, and low toxicity, as compared to surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Given its importance as cancer treatment, we review the latest research on the subtypes of TNBC and relevant targeted therapies.
Collapse
|
11
|
Updated recommendations regarding the management of older patients with breast cancer: a joint paper from the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) and the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e327-e340. [PMID: 34000244 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30741-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Revised: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is increasingly prevalent in older adults and is a substantial part of routine oncology practice. However, management of breast cancer in this population is challenging because the disease is highly heterogeneous and there is insufficient evidence specific to older adults. Decision making should not be driven by age alone but should involve geriatric assessments plus careful consideration of life expectancy, competing risks of mortality, and patient preferences. A multidisciplinary taskforce, including members of the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists and International Society of Geriatric Oncology, gathered to expand and update the previous 2012 evidence-based recommendations for the management of breast cancer in older individuals with the endorsement of the European Cancer Organisation. These guidelines were expanded to include chemotherapy toxicity prediction calculators, cultural and social considerations, surveillance imaging, genetic screening, gene expression profiles, neoadjuvant systemic treatment options, bone-modifying drugs, targeted therapies, and supportive care. Recommendations on geriatric assessment, ductal carcinoma in situ, screening, primary endocrine therapy, surgery, radiotherapy, adjuvant systemic therapy, and secondary breast cancer were updated.
Collapse
|
12
|
Liu PF, Zhuo ZL, Xie F, Wang S, Zhao XT. Four novel BRCA variants found in Chinese hereditary breast cancer patients by next-generation sequencing. Clin Chim Acta 2021; 516:55-63. [PMID: 33476590 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer among women worldwide. Patients carrying mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes like BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) account for 5-10% of all breast cancer patients. Therefore, screening for susceptibility genes may reduce the incidence of breast cancer and improve prognosis. To provide evidence for mutation interpretation and targeted drug use in breast cancer patients, gene mutations were screened in 78 women diagnosed with sporadic breast cancer using a next-generation sequencing panel, confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Then the pathogenicity of the identified novel variants was explored using in vitro experiments including western blotting, co-immunoprecipitation and cell-migration assays. Four novel variants (BRCA2 L1390W, BRCA2 Glu432fs, BRCA1 P706L, and BRCA1 Cys882fs) were identified. BRCA2 Glu432fs decreased the expression of BRCA2 protein, enhanced cell migration and invasion ability, and prevented the protein from interacting with RAD51, resulting in a defect in the homologous recombination pathway. The identification of these novel BRCA variants and the confirmation of their pathogenicity have enriched the genetic database of breast cancer, especially in the Chinese population. Moreover, the variants are the genetic risk factors for hereditary breast cancer. Therefore, BRCA variant detection and genetic counseling for breast cancer patients are meaningful and important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng-Fei Liu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Zhong-Ling Zhuo
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Fei Xie
- Breast Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Shu Wang
- Breast Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Xiao-Tao Zhao
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liposits G, Wulff CN, Otland A, Fokdal LU. Olaparib treatment in older patients with ovarian cancer: need for 'real-world' data beyond clinical trials. Ecancermedicalscience 2020; 14:1104. [PMID: 33082854 PMCID: PMC7532029 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ageing is a risk factor for cancer. Worldwide, the number and proportion of adults aged ≥65 will increase, along with the incidence of ovarian cancer. Older adults are under-represented in randomised clinical trials (RCTs), and those who are enrolled have a good performance status and no major health issues. These patients are not representative of older patients seen in everyday clinical practice; therefore, age-specific data on efficacy and toxicity of olaparib in the ‘real-world’ setting are lacking. Methods This observational study was conducted in the Central Jutland Region in Denmark. Data in unselected older (≥65) patients with known BRCA mutation receiving olaparib maintenance treatment for platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer were registered between 2015 and 2019. Toxicity and progression-free survival (PFS) were registered. No geriatric assessment has been performed. Results In total, 20 consecutive patients ≥65 years were included with a median age of 75 years (range: 65–85). Most of the patients (18/20) had ECOG PS: 0–1. Treatment interruption and dose reduction occurred in 65% of the patients. Toxicities of any grade occurred in 18 (90%), whereas grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 6 patients (30%). Treatment was terminated due to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity in 13 (65%) patients. The median PFS was 6 months (range: 2–31), and the median follow-up was 15 months (range: 3–30). Discussion Our ‘real-world’ experience shows that unselected older patients represent a significant larger proportion in real life than in RCTs; furthermore, older patients in a real-world setting may experience more side effects possibly affecting the quality of life. The median PFS data suggest that older patients may not derive the same clinical benefit than their fit and younger counterparts. There is a need to enrol vulnerable/frail older patients into RCTs, ensuring that data will also be applicable in standard clinical settings. Incorporating geriatric assessment into these trials should be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabor Liposits
- Department of Oncology, Region Hospital West Jutland, Gl. Landevej 61, Herning 7400, Denmark.,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8204-3949
| | - Christian Nielsen Wulff
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Indgang D3, Plan 2, Krydspunkt D203, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Anne Otland
- Department of Oncology, Region Hospital West Jutland, Gl. Landevej 61, Herning 7400, Denmark
| | - Lars Ulrik Fokdal
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Indgang D3, Plan 2, Krydspunkt D203, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Colombo N, Oza AM, Lorusso D, Aghajanian C, Oaknin A, Dean A, Weberpals JI, Clamp AR, Scambia G, Leary A, Holloway RW, Gancedo MA, Fong PC, Goh JC, O'Malley DM, Armstrong DK, Banerjee S, García-Donas J, Swisher EM, Meunier J, Cameron T, Maloney L, Goble S, Bedel J, Ledermann JA, Coleman RL. The effect of age on efficacy, safety and patient-centered outcomes with rucaparib: A post hoc exploratory analysis of ARIEL3, a phase 3, randomized, maintenance study in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:101-111. [PMID: 32861537 PMCID: PMC8450972 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the phase 3 trial ARIEL3, maintenance treatment with the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib provided clinical benefit versus placebo for patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Here, we evaluate the impact of age on the clinical utility of rucaparib in ARIEL3. METHODS Patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian carcinoma with ≥2 prior platinum-based chemotherapies who responded to their last platinum-based therapy were enrolled in ARIEL3 and randomized 2:1 to rucaparib 600 mg twice daily or placebo. Exploratory, post hoc analyses of progression-free survival (PFS), patient-centered outcomes (quality-adjusted PFS [QA-PFS] and quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity [Q-TWiST]), and safety were conducted in three age subgroups (<65 years, 65-74 years, and ≥75 years). RESULTS Investigator-assessed PFS was significantly longer with rucaparib than placebo in patients aged <65 years (rucaparib n = 237 vs placebo n = 117; median, 11.1 vs 5.4 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.33 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.25-0.43]; P < 0.0001) and 65-74 years (n = 113 vs n = 64; median, 8.3 vs 5.3 months; HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.29-0.63]; P < 0.0001) and numerically longer in patients aged ≥75 years (n = 25 vs n = 8; median, 9.2 vs 5.5 months; HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.16-1.35]; P = 0.1593). QA-PFS and Q-TWiST were significantly longer with rucaparib than placebo across all age subgroups. Safety of rucaparib was generally similar across the age subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Efficacy, patient-centered outcomes, and safety of rucaparib were similar between age subgroups, indicating that all eligible women with recurrent ovarian cancer should be offered this therapeutic option, irrespective of age. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01968213.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Cancer Program, University of Milan-Bicocca and European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20146 Milan, Italy.
| | - Amit M Oza
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Ana Oaknin
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, C/Natzaret, 115-117, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrew Dean
- Department of Medical Oncology, St John of God Hospital Subiaco, 12 Salvado Rd, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
| | - Johanne I Weberpals
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Andrew R Clamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Alexandra Leary
- Gynecological Unit, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, INSERM U981, and Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), 98405 Villejuif, France
| | - Robert W Holloway
- Gynecologic Oncology, Advent Health Cancer Institute, 601 East Rollins St, Orlando, FL 32803, USA
| | - Margarita Amenedo Gancedo
- Medical Oncology Department, Oncology Center of Galicia, Rúa Doctor Camilo Veiras, 1, 15009 La Coruña, Spain
| | - Peter C Fong
- Medical Oncology Department, Auckland City Hospital, Grafton, 2 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
| | - Jeffrey C Goh
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, and University of Queensland, Cnr Butterfield St and Bowen Bridge Rd, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - David M O'Malley
- Gynecologic Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Starling-Loving Hall, 320 West 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Deborah K Armstrong
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University Medical Center, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Susana Banerjee
- Gynaecology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Jesus García-Donas
- Division of Medical Oncology, HM Hospitales-Centro Integral Oncológico Hospital de Madrid Clara Campal, Calle Oña 10, 28050 Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elizabeth M Swisher
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356460, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | | | - Terri Cameron
- Clinical Science, Clovis Oncology UK Ltd., Granta Centre, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6GP, UK
| | - Lara Maloney
- Clinical Development, Clovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Parkway, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
| | - Sandra Goble
- Biostatistics, Clovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Parkway, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
| | - Josh Bedel
- Pricing & Market Access - Europe, Clovis Oncology Switzerland GmBH, Seefeldstrasse 69, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan A Ledermann
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London and UCL Hospitals, 72 Huntley St, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Robert L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Battisti NML, Liposits G, De Glas NA, Gomes F, Baldini C, Mohile S. Systemic Therapy of Common Tumours in Older Patients: Challenges and Opportunities. A Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology Review Paper. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22:98. [PMID: 32725503 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-00958-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Decision-making for systemic treatments in older patients with cancer is difficult because of concerns for decreased organ function, risk of toxicity, limited life expectancy due to comorbidities and the lack of evidence available to guide its management in this population. Here, we review the data on the role of systemic agents for the treatment of common malignancies in this age group. RECENT FINDINGS Evidence on the use of systemic treatments for older patients with cancer is increasing, especially for newer options including immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents that provide comparable benefit in older and younger patients. Nonetheless, the risks for short- and long-term toxicities need to be considered. More research is warranted and represents a unique opportunity to increase the knowledge on cancer treatment for older adults. Healthy, older individuals should be considered for standard systemic treatment options, whereas those at risk based on geriatric assessments require adjusted plans. Geriatric assessments are key for decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5PT, UK. .,Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
| | - Gabor Liposits
- Department of Oncology, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Gl Landevej 61, 7400, Herning, Denmark
| | - Nienke Aafke De Glas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, Leiden, ZA, Netherlands
| | - Fabio Gomes
- Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Capucine Baldini
- Drug Development Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Supriya Mohile
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave # 704, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Perspectives on geriatric oncology research presented at the 2019 ESMO Congress. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 11:543-548. [PMID: 31831360 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
17
|
El-Kenawy A, Benarba B, Neves AF, de Araujo TG, Tan BL, Gouri A. Gene surgery: Potential applications for human diseases. EXCLI JOURNAL 2019; 18:908-930. [PMID: 31762718 PMCID: PMC6868916 DOI: 10.17179/excli2019-1833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Gene therapy became in last decade a new emerging therapeutic era showing promising results against different diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and neurological disorders. Recently, the genome editing technique for eukaryotic cells called CRISPR-Cas (Clustered Regulatory Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) has enriched the field of gene surgery with enhanced applications. In the present review, we summarized the different applications of gene surgery for treating human diseases such as cancer, diabetes, nervous, and cardiovascular diseases, besides the molecular mechanisms involved in these important effects. Several studies support the important therapeutic applications of gene surgery in a large number of health disorders and diseases including β-thalassemia, cancer, immunodeficiencies, diabetes, and neurological disorders. In diabetes, gene surgery was shown to be effective in type 1 diabetes by triggering different signaling pathways. Furthermore, gene surgery, especially that using CRISPR-Cas possessed important application on diagnosis, screening and treatment of several cancers such as lung, liver, pancreatic and colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, gene surgery still presents some limitations such as the design difficulties and costs regarding ZFNs (Zinc Finger Nucleases) and TALENs (Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases) use, off-target effects, low transfection efficiency, in vivo delivery-safety and ethical issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayman El-Kenawy
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Taif University, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Molecular Biology, GEBRI, University of Sadat City, P.O. Box 79, Sadat City, Egypt
| | - Bachir Benarba
- Laboratory Research on Biological Systems and Geomatics, Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences, University of Mascara, Algeria
| | - Adriana Freitas Neves
- Institute of Biotechnology, Molecular Biology Laboratory, Universidade Federal de Goias, Catalao, Brazil
| | - Thaise Gonçalves de Araujo
- Laboratory of Genetics and Biotechnology, Institute of Biotechnology, Federal University of Uberlandia, Patos de Minas, MG, Brazil
| | - Bee Ling Tan
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Adel Gouri
- Laboratory of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Annaba, Algeria
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Battisti NML, Dubianski R. Perspectives on geriatric oncology research presented at the 2019 St. Gallen international breast cancer conference. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 10:673-676. [PMID: 31060963 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti
- Department of Medicine, Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.
| | - Roman Dubianski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Department of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, ul. W.K. Roentgena 5, 02-781 Warszawa, Poland
| |
Collapse
|