HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: from obscurity to prominence

Endemic HBV among hospital in-patients in Bangladesh, including evidence of occult infection

Bangladesh is one of the top-ten most heavily burdened countries for viral hepatitis, with hepatitis B (HBV) infections responsible for the majority of cases. Recombinant and occult HBV infections (OBI) have been reported previously in the region. We investigated an adult fever cohort (n=201) recruited in Dhaka, to determine the prevalence of HBV and OBI. A target-enrichment deep sequencing pipeline was applied to samples with HBV DNA >3.0 log₁₀ IU ml⁻¹. HBV infection was present in 16/201 (8 %), among whom 3/16 (19 %) were defined as OBI (HBsAg-negative but detectable HBV DNA). Whole genome deep sequences (WGS) were obtained for four cases, identifying genotypes A, C and D. One OBI case had sufficient DNA for sequencing, revealing multiple polymorphisms in the surface gene that may contribute to the occult phenotype. We identified mutations associated with nucleos(t)ide analogue resistance in 3/4 samples sequenced, although the clinical significance in this cohort is unknown. The high prevalence of HBV in this setting illustrates the importance of opportunistic clinical screening and DNA testing of transfusion products to minimise OBI transmission. WGS can inform understanding of diverse disease phenotypes, supporting progress towards international targets for HBV elimination.

Evaluation of Point Shear Wave Elastography Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging for Longitudinal Fibrosis Assessment in Patients with HBeAg-Negative HBV Infection

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic HBeAg-negative Hepatitis B is of crucial importance not only to predict the long-term clinical course, but also to evaluate antiviral therapy indication. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the utility of point shear wave elastography (pSWE) for longitudinal non-invasive fibrosis assessment in a large cohort of untreated patients with chronic HBeAg-negative hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

METHODS

407 consecutive patients with HBeAg-negative HBV infection who underwent pSWE, transient elastography (TE) as well as laboratory fibrosis markers, including fibrosis index based on four factors (FIB-4), aspartate to platelet ratio index (APRI) and FibroTest, on the same day were prospectively followed up for six years. Patients were classified into one of the three groups: inactive carriers (IC; HBV-DNA <2000 IU/mL and ALT <40 U/L); grey zone group 1 (GZ-1; HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL and ALT >40 U/L); grey zone group 2 (GZ-2; HBV-DNA >2000 IU/mL and ALT <40 U/L).

RESULTS

pSWE results were significantly correlated with TE (r = 0.29, p < 0.001) and APRI (r = 0.17; p = 0.005). Median pSWE values did not differ between IC, GZ-1 and GZ-2 patients (p = 0.82, p = 0.17, p = 0.34). During six years of follow-up, median pSWE and TE values did not differ significantly over time (TE: p = 0.27; pSWE: p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that pSWE could be useful for non-invasive fibrosis assessment and follow-up in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection.

Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Liver Decompensation

The goal in patients with immune active hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is to significantly suppress viral replication and prevent progression of fibrosis to cirrhosis and liver decompensation and decrease the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. This is achievable by the highly active antivirals, entecavir and tenofovir, which are considered first-line therapy in most patients with immune active hepatitis C virus and after liver transplantation to prevent HBV recurrence. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis should be referred for liver transplantation and treated with first-line antivirals as early as possible, with the goal of achieving complete viral suppression in the shortest time possible.

Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

The novel prodrug tenofovir alafenamide delivers the nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir to target cells more efficiently at a lower dose than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, thereby reducing systemic exposure. We compared the efficacy and safety of the two drugs in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in a non-inferiority study.

METHODS

In this ongoing randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority study in 105 centres in 17 countries, patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV were randomly assigned (2:1) by a computer-generated allocation sequence (block size six), stratified by plasma HBV DNA concentration and previous treatment status, to receive once-daily oral doses of tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg, each with matching placebo. Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to group assignment. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection (with plasma HBV DNA concentrations of >20 000 IU/mL), serum alanine aminotransferase concentrations of greater than 60 U/L in men or greater than 38 U/L in women and at no more than ten times the upper limit of normal, and estimated creatinine clearance of at least 50 mL/min (by the Cockcroft-Gault method). The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who had HBV DNA less than 29 IU/mL at week 48 in those who received at least one dose of study drug; the study was powered to show non-inferiority with a 10% efficacy margin of tenofovir alafenamide compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Bone and renal safety, and key secondary safety endpoints were assessed sequentially. The study will be conducted for a total of 3 years as a double-blind comparison to assess the longer term response to treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01940341.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 12, 2013, and Oct 31, 2014, 426 patients were randomly assigned (285 assigned to tenofovir alafenamide and 141 assigned to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; one patient assigned to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate did not receive the treatment. 268 (94%) of 285 patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide had HBV DNA less than 29 IU/mL at week 48 versus 130 (93%) of 140 patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (difference 1·8% [95% CI -3·6 to 7·2]; p=0·47), which demonstrates non-inferiority. Patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide had significantly smaller mean percentage declines in bone mineral density than those receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (hip -0·29% [95% CI -0·55 to -0·03] vs -2·16% [-2·53 to -1·79], adjusted percentage difference 1·87% [95% CI 1·42 to 2·32; p<0·0001]; spine -0·88% [-1·22 to -0·54] vs -2·51% [-3·09 to -1·94], adjusted percentage difference 1·64% [95% CI 1·01 to 2·27]; p<0·0001). At week 48, mean change in serum creatinine was small in both groups (tenofovir alafenamide 0·01 mg/dL [95% CI 0·00 to 0·02] vs tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 0·02 mg/dL [0·00 to 0·04], adjusted percentage difference -0·01 mg/dL [95% CI -0·03 to 0·01]; p=0·32), but patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide had a smaller reduction in creatinine clearance (median change in estimated glomerular filtration rate -1·8 mL/min [IQR -7·8 to 6·0] vs -4·8 mL/min [-12·0 to 3·0]; p=0·004). Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity in the two treatment groups. The most common adverse events overall were headache (tenofovir alafenamide 40 [14%] patients vs tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 14 [10%] patients), nasopharyngitis (30 [11%] vs 15 [11%]), and upper respiratory tract infection (35 [12%] vs ten [7%]). 14 (5%) patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide and nine (6%) patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate had serious adverse events, none of which was deemed by investigators to be related to study treatment; one patient in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group died, but this was not deemed to be related to study treatment.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV, the efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferior to that of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and had improved bone and renal effects. Longer term follow-up is needed to better understand the clinical impact of these changes.

FUNDING

Gilead Sciences.

The Emergent Concern of Hepatitis B globally with special attention to Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Chronic viral hepatitis is highly prevalent and creates a substantial burden to healthcare systems globally. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that over 350 and 250 million people worldwide are chronic carrier of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection respectively. These two diseases are the cause of significant global mortality and morbidity with approximately 1 million deaths each year attributable to them and their sequelae, liver disease and primary liver cancer. Although the efforts have been met with the long-lasting level of success and holds the promise for large reductions in disease burden in spite of the huge numbers of HBV infected population. The viral hepatitis has also been emerged as a leading public health concern and continues to be major disease burden in the Eastern Mediterranean. The WHO, estimates that approximately 4.3 million persons are infected with HBV in the Region each year. Saudi Arabia has been classified as a country with an intermediate prevalence of HBV showed up to 7% in Saudi children in late 1980s but declined to as low as 0.3% in 1997 since the introduction of universal vaccination of all Saudi children in 1989. In spite of this remarkable decline, the burden of decompensated liver disease secondary to hepatitis B is estimated to increase drastically in the next 40 years as the previously infected children start aging.

Durability after discontinuation of nucleos(t)ide therapy in chronic HBeAg negative hepatitis patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Relapse has been reported after stopping nucleos(t)ide (NUC) therapy in the majority of chronic HBeAg negative hepatitis patients. However, the ideal treatment duration of HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is not well known. We investigated the frequency of relapse in HBeAg negative CHB patients receiving NUC therapy.

METHODS

The NUC therapy was discontinued at least 3 times undetectable level of HBV DNA leave 6 months space in 45 patients. Clinical relapse was defined as HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >2 times of upper limit of normal range. Virological relapse was defined as HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL.

RESULTS

Clinical relapse developed in 16 (35.6%) and 24 (53.3%) patients after stopping therapy at 6 months and 12 months off therapy, respectively. Virological relapse developed 22 (48.9%) and 33 (73.3%) patients at 6 months and 12 months off therapy. The factors such as age, gender, cirrhosis, baseline AST, ALT, HBV DNA levels, treatment duration, and consolidation duration were analyzed to investigate the predictive factors associated with 1 year sustained response. Of these factors, cirrhosis (86.1% in CHB, 22.2% in LC) was significantly associated with 1 year virological relapse rate. Baseline HBV DNA and total treatment duration tended to be associated with virological relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Virological relapse developed in the majority (73.3%) of HBeAg negative CHB patients and clinical relapse developed in the half (53.3%) of patients at 1 year off therapy. Cirrhosis may be associated with the low rate of virological relapse.

Virologic response and resistance to lamivudine in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a ten-year retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Emergence of resistance was recognized shortly after the introduction of lamivudine. This 10 year retrospective study investigates resistance to lamivudine and the modifications of antiviral strategies required.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and nine patients were treated with lamivudine. Sixty seven out of 209 patients were excluded from the present study. HBVDNA was tested using the PCR assay and genotypic resistance was performed using the direct PCR sequencing.

RESULTS

In the 125 patients initially treated with lamivudine monotherapy: Α) 48 (38.4%) patients with a mean time of 63.6±26.2 months under lamivudine treatment have normal ALT levels with negative (19%) or low (<1X102) HBVDNA levels, 10% developed cirrhosis, 1 HCC and 6% cleared HBsAg. Β) Resistance was developed in 61.60% patients within 45±23.84 months of lamivudine treatment. These patients were: 1) either switched to adefovir (9), entecavir (2) or tenofovir (2) or adefovir was added to lamivudine (21) for a short time and then they were switched to adefovir alone. Six out of 34 patients developed cirrhosis and 4 HCC while on treatment. 2) or adefovir was added-on to lamivudine (43). In 39 out of 43 treatment is ongoing while on virological response. No one developed cirrhosis or HCC. C) Seventeen patients received de novo combination therapy with lamivudine and adefovir and 2 out of 17 (11.7%) showed resistance to adefovir after 24 months of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that a) approximately 38.4% of patients maintain viral suppression more than 5 years of lamivudine treatment and b) rescue therapy with add-on adefovir to ongoing lamivudine, seems to be a better treatment strategy associated with long term benefit regarding disease complications.

Naturally occurring core immune-escape and carboxy-terminal mutations\truncations in patients with e antigen negative chronic hepatitis B

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular injury is often progressive in patients with hepatitis B e antigen negative chronic hepatitis B (HBeAg -ve CHB). There is scant data on association of core mutations occurring in patients with HBeAg -ve CHB with severity of liver disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hundred and eighteen patients with chronic infection who were HBeAg negative, anti-HBe, and HBV DNA positive were enrolled. Precore and core regions were amplified, sequenced, and analyzed for precore, T helper, cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), B-cell epitope, and core carboxy-terminal region mutations.

RESULTS

Majority of patients were infected with HBV genotype D: 96 (81%) [D1: 16, D2: 55 and D5: 25] followed by genotype A1: 15 (13%) and genotype C: 7 (6%) [C1: 5 and unidentified subgenotype C: 2]. Classical (A1896) as well as nonclassical precore region mutations were detected in 30 (25%) and in 9 (7.6%) patients, respectively. Core immune escape, core carboxy-terminal mutations and truncations were detected in 61 (52%), 11 (9.3%), and 14 (12%) patients, respectively. Three core immune escape mutations were significantly higher in patients with coexisting precore stop codon compared with patients without precore stop codon mutation, cT12S (43 vs. 8%, p < 0.001), cS21T (16 vs. 3.4%, p < 0.026), and cE77D (30 vs. 4.5%, p < 0.002). When frequency of core immune escape mutations was compared among CHB and decompensated patients, and cT12S: (27 vs. 10%, p < 0.05), cS21T (16 vs. 1.35%, p < 0.01), cT67P/N: (20 vs. 4%, p < 0.001), cE113D (11.37 vs. 1.35%, p < 0.05), and cP130T/Q (7 vs. 0%, p < 0.001) mutations were found to be significantly higher in decompensated patients.

CONCLUSION

Core immune-escape mutations cT12S, cS21T, cT67P, cE113D, and cP130T/Q are significantly higher in decompensated liver disease patients and could influence the severity of liver disease in HBeAg -ve CHB patients.

Sustained responses and loss of HBsAg in HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B who stop long-term treatment with adefovir

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Little is known about the biochemical and virological effects of stopping long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

We performed a cohort observational study, following 33 HBeAg-negative patients with CHB, undetectable serum HBV DNA, and normal levels of aminotransferases after long-term (4 or 5 years) treatment with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV). All patients were followed for 5.5 years; follow-up visits included measurements of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and HBV DNA monthly for the first 6 months and every 3-6 months thereafter. Various factors were measured at baseline, the end of treatment (EOT), and following treatment to identify those associated with clearance of HBsAg.

RESULTS

During the first few months of the postdiscontinuation period, all patients experienced virological and 25 (76%) had biochemical relapse. During the follow-up period, 18 patients (55%) who had discontinued antiviral therapy achieved sustained response (HBV DNA level <2000 IU/L, persistently normal level of ALT). Among these, 13 (72%) cleared HBsAg. Fifteen patients (45%) with virological and/or biochemical relapse were re-treated with oral antiviral agents (11 during the first 18 months and 4 after the third year), without evidence of liver decompensation; only 1 lost HBsAg (6%). Higher pretreatment and EOT levels of ALT, no previous treatment with interferon, and lower level of HBsAg at the EOT were significantly associated with HBsAg clearance based on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In HBeAg-negative patients with CHB, it is safe and effective to discontinue ADV therapy after 4 or 5 years; 55% of patients have sustained responses, and 39% of patients lose HBsAg.

Long-term follow-up of hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients treated with peginterferon α-2a: progressive decrease in hepatitis B surface antigen in responders

OBJECTIVE

Peginterferon (PEG-IFN) is considered as a first-line treatment option for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B. We aimed to evaluate the long-term response to PEG-IFN in HBeAg-negative patients.

METHODS

All patients enrolled in the PARC study who completed the treatment phase were eligible for this long-term follow-up (LTFU) study. Patients received PEG-IFN α-2a (180 μg weekly) ± ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) for 48 weeks and had at least one additional LTFU visit after the initial follow-up period of 24 weeks (mean duration 2.1 ± 0.2 years). Retreated patients were considered nonresponders.

RESULTS

Of 117 patients who completed the treatment phase, 79 (68%) were included in this LTFU study. Among 19 patients with a combined response at 24 weeks after treatment [initial responders; hepatitis B virus DNA<10 000 copies/ml (<1714 IU/ml) and normal alanine aminotransferase], 12 (63%) sustained this response through LTFU. Three additional patients showed such a response at LTFU, resulting in a total of 15 (19%) combined responders at LTFU. A marked decrease in the serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels was observed in initial responders, resulting in HBsAg clearance in 26% of the patients (6% of all LTFU participants).

CONCLUSION

About one-third of HBeAg-negative patients with a response to PEG-IFN at 24 weeks after treatment subsequently had a relapse during 2 years of follow-up. Despite the limited overall efficacy of PEG-IFN, patients responding to PEG-IFN treatment showed a marked decrease in serum HBsAg, resulting in a high rate of HBsAg clearance, which indicates the need for predictors of response to PEG-IFN in HBeAg-negative disease.

Hepatitis B surface antigen: relation to hepatitis B replication parameters in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Translation of HBsAg depends on transcription of the appropriate mRNAs from cccDNA, but its relation to other hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication parameters is not known, inasmuch as integrated sequences of HBV-DNA may also contribute to its serum levels, especially in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

METHODS

We investigated HBsAg serum levels, its hepatocellular expression, and their relationship to HBV replicative- and host-response parameters before treatment in 54 HBeAg-negative CHB patients and in 15 of them after 40.1±33.3months of virological response on oral antiviral (NUC) therapy also. Liver cccDNA and HBV-DNA quantitation, HBsAg- and HBcAg-immunostaining were performed in the same needle biopsy material, while serum HBsAg and HBV-DNA levels were measured in samples drawn on the day of liver biopsy.

RESULTS

In untreated patients, serum HBsAg correlated positively with HBsAg-positive hepatocytes/mm(2) (p=0.003) and weakly with serum HBV-DNA, but not with cccDNA, liver HBV-DNA, HBcAg-positive hepatocytes/mm(2), or ALT. cccDNA correlated significantly with liver HBV-DNA (p<0.00001), ALT (p=0.001), and serum HBV-DNA levels (p=0.012) but not with liver HBsAg or HBcAg. Antiviral therapy decreased serum HBsAg levels by 79.6% (p=0.012) and liver HBV-DNA by 84.4% (p=0.026) in paired comparisons and, as expected, significantly decreased serum HBV-DNA and ALT levels, but not cccDNA.

CONCLUSIONS

In untreated HBeAg-negative CHB, serum HBsAg levels reflect liver HBsAg, but not cccDNA or liver HBV-DNA, suggesting that they are not solely dependent on the replicative cycle of HBV. Effective NUC therapy for 3.34 years significantly lowers serum HBsAg and liver HBV-DNA, but not cccDNA.

The natural history of chronic HBV infection and geographical differences

Although chronic HBV infection is a global health issue, there are geographical differences in the mode of transmission, prevalence and HBV genotype distribution. Chronic HBV infection is a dynamic state of interactions between HBV, hepatocytes and immune cells of the host. Accordingly, the natural history of chronic HBV infection typically starts with an immune tolerant phase, followed by an immune clearance phase and finally an inactive phase. The duration of the immune tolerant phase is usually long in chronic HBV infection acquired perinatally or in early childhood, otherwise the duration is very short. During the inactive phase, spontaneous hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance might occur at an annual rate of 1-2%; however, HBV reactivation with hepatitis activity could occur over time in one-quarter to one-third of HBsAg-seropositive patients. This occurs more frequently in males and in patients infected with genotypes D, C and B. The effort of active HBV replication-triggered immune clearance is the driving force of liver injury and subsequent disease progression in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive or HBeAg-negative hepatitis. Clinical studies have shown that chronic HBV infection in western countries is associated with a higher incidence of cirrhosis, but lower incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma, than in Asian countries. The geographical differences in age at the time of infection and predominant HBV genotype could account for the variance in the natural history of chronic HBV infection; however, some of these differences might actually result from comparisons between cohorts with different age, gender distribution or fibrosis stage.

Hepatitis B virus variants

HBV replicates through reverse transcription of an RNA intermediate; the inherent lack of proofreading causes a high mutation frequency. Mutations in the precore and core promoter regions that abolish or reduce the production of hepatitis B e antigen occur most commonly. Patients with these HBV variants remain viremic and can develop progressive liver disease. Mutations in the core promoter region are associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Exogenous selection pressure might favor certain mutations. Mutations in the HBV polymerase that confer resistance to nucleoside and nucleotide analog treatments are a major barrier to the success of therapy for hepatitis B. The development of antiviral drug resistance negates the initial treatment response and can lead to hepatitis flares and hepatic decompensation. Prompt addition of another drug to which the virus is not cross-resistant is required. Mutations in the HBV surface protein that facilitate escape from host immunity are responsible for the failure of immune prophylaxis in infants who received HBV vaccine and in liver transplant recipients who received hepatitis B immune globulin.

To "be" or not to "be": that is the question

Treatment guidelines currently consider hepatitis B early antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion to be the end point of treatment with oral antivirals for HBeAg-positive patients. However, it is clear that with the high HBeAg relapse rate (both natural and after treatment) along with the high rate of mixed infection and the prevalence of HBeAg-negative disease, HBeAg status can no longer be considered the most useful end point of treatment or the signal to initiate therapy. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss or seroconversion is associated with a favorable prognosis in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative disease and should be considered the test result that, combined with undetectable HBV DNA, will trigger treatment cessation.

[Natural history and clinical manifestations of chronic hepatitis B virus]

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a serious public health problem worldwide. In the last few decades, major advances have been achieved that have contributed to greater understanding of the natural history and clinical manifestations of this infection. The fluctuation between viral replication and the host's immune response has implications in the pathogenesis and progression of the hepatic lesion. In immunocompetent adults, most HBV infections resolve spontaneously in contrast with progression to chronic infection in most infants. Patients with chronic hepatitis due to HBV or chronic hepatitis B can present at four phases: 1) the immune tolerance phase, 2) HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, 3) inactive HBsAg carrier state, and 4) HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis. HBeAg-positive or -negative chronic hepatitis can progress to cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. Progression to these complications is more frequent in HBeAg-negative forms, associated with mutations that affect the pre-core region and maintain active viral replication. Risk factors are HBV-DNA positive serum levels, an increase in serum transaminase levels and some genotypes. These factors highlight the need to evaluate and monitor all HBV carriers to identify those who could benefit from early antiviral treatment, thus avoiding progression to more advanced forms of liver disease. These measures could improve prevention and treatment of hepatitis B.

Hepatitis B virus infection

Since the introduction of the hepatitis B vaccine and other preventive measures, the worldwide prevalence of hepatitis B infection has fallen. However, chronic infection remains a challenging global health problem, with more than 350 million people chronically infected and at risk of hepatic decompensation, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. An improved understanding of hepatitis B virology, immunology, and the natural course of chronic infection, has identified hepatitis B virus replication as the key driver of immune-mediated liver injury and disease progression. The approval of potent oral antiviral agents has revolutionised hepatitis B treatment since 1998. Conventional and pegylated interferon alfa and nucleoside and nucleotide analogues are widely authorised treatments, and monotherapy with these drugs greatly suppresses virus replication, reduces hepatitis activity, and halts disease progression. However, hepatitis B virus is rarely eliminated, and drug resistance is a major drawback during long term therapy. The development of new drugs and strategies is needed to improve treatment outcomes.

Relapse of hepatitis B in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients who discontinued successful entecavir treatment: the case for continuous antiviral therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To evaluate the off-treatment durability of response in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients who achieved a protocol-defined 'Response' (HBV-DNA<0.7MEq/mL and ALT<1.25xULN) with entecavir at 48 weeks and the efficacy of entecavir in patients treated beyond one year.

METHODS

Entecavir-treated and lamivudine-treated patients who achieved a protocol-defined 'Response' were evaluated off-treatment for HBV-DNA<300copies/mL and ALT normalisation. Entecavir- and lamivudine-treated patients who achieved a protocol-defined 'Virological Response' (HBV-DNA<0.7MEq/mL but ALT1.25xULN) at 48 weeks, continued blinded treatment until they achieved Response or 96 weeks, whichever came first.

RESULTS

Among 'Responders' who discontinued treatment after 48 weeks, 7/257 (3%) entecavir-treated and 10/201 (5%) lamivudine-treated patients sustained HBV-DNA below 300copies/mL at 24-weeks off-treatment. Among the 54 patients who continued blinded treatment in the second year, 7/26 (27%) entecavir-treated and 6/28 (21%) lamivudine-treated patients normalised ALT and 22/26 (85%) entecavir-treated and 16/28 (57%) lamivudine-treated patients maintained HBV-DNA<300copies/mL at end-of-dosing. The safety profiles of both drugs remained comparable through a second year of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of protocol-defined Responders relapsed after 1 year when treatment was discontinued. Treatment with entecavir beyond 1 year provided continued virological and biochemical benefit.

Epidemiology of chronic hepatitis B infection in France: risk factors for significant fibrosis--results of a nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological data concerning hepatitis B are scarce in France.

AIM

To describe epidemiological, clinical, virological and histological features of HBsAg-positive patients followed at non-academic hospitals in France.

METHODS

Clinical, biological, virological and histological data of all HBsAg-positive consecutive patients observed from April 1, 2001 to May 31, 2002 in participating centres were recorded prospectively. Multivariate analyses of factors associated with significant fibrosis and cirrhosis were performed.

RESULTS

Nearly 1166 HBsAg-positive patients were seen in the 58 centres: 671 males and 495 females from metropolitan France (32%) and from outside metropolitan France (68%); mean age 41 +/- 15 years. Twenty-nine percent of patients were probable HBsAg inactive carriers, while 50% had chronic hepatitis; 43% of these were HBeAg-positive and 57% HBeAg-negative. Liver biopsy had been performed in 558 (51%) patients; 205 (17.6%) patients had cirrhosis. By multivariate analysis, factors associated with significant fibrosis were: age >40 years (P < 0.05), HBeAg-negative status (P < 0.02) and histological activity (P < 0.0001). Factors associated with cirrhosis: age (P < 0.0001), platelet count <150 000/mm(3) (P < 0.0001) and viral co-infection (P < 0.03).

CONCLUSION

HBV infection represents a significant workload for hepatogastroenterologists at non-academic hospitals in France.

Treatment paradigms on hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients

The primary goal of treatment in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is potent and durable suppression of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. It results in biochemical and histological remission of CHB and is the prerequisite for the prevention of cirrhosis, its life-threatening complications and hepatocellular carcinoma. Responses that are durable after the cessation of treatment are referred to as sustained virological responses, whereas those persisting under therapy are referred to as treatment-maintained virological responses. Treatment paradigms of sustained virological response in HBeAg-negative CHB are practically restricted to conventional IFN-alpha and pegylated interferons (peg-IFNs), and are limited only to patients with compensated liver disease. Long-lasting maintained virological responses without HBV resistance in HBeAg-negative CHB are achievable by all approved nucleos(t)ide analogues (lamivudine, adefovir and entecavir) in highly variable rates, depending on their potency, rapidity of virological response and genetic barrier to resistance. The maintenance of response under 5 years of adefovir treatment represents the most effective treatment paradigm for HBeAg-negative CHB, whereas such long-term data with entecavir and tenofovir monotherapy may become available in the near future. In patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV mutants, the recommended treatment strategy is to add adefovir at the same time as continuing treatment with lamivudine. There are no treatment paradigms as yet of combination therapy from the very outset with two nucleoside analogues for use in treatment-naive patients.