Hepatitis C impairs survival following liver transplantation irrespective of concomitant hepatocellular carcinoma

No need to discontinue hepatitis C virus therapy at the time of liver transplantation

Objectives

Direct antiviral agents (DAA) has dramatically improved the therapy outcome of hepatitis C-virus (HCV) infection, both on the waiting-list and post liver transplantation (LT). DAA are generally well-tolerated in patients with mild to moderate liver and kidney failure, but some DAAs are contraindicated in patients with severe dysfunction of these organs. Today there are few studies of peri-LT DAA use and treatment is commonly discontinued at the time of LT. We report here our experience of DAA therapy given continuously in the perioperative LT period in a real-life setting in Sweden.

Material

In total 10 patients with HCV-cirrhosis, with or without hepatocellular carcinoma, and a median age of 60.5 years (range, 52–65) were treated with DAAs on the waiting list for LT, and continued in the early postoperative period without any interruption, on the basis of not having reached a full treatment course at the time of LT. Sofosbuvir and a NS5A inhibitor with or without ribavirin, or sofosbuvir and ribavirin only, were given. The distribution of genotypes was genotype 1 and 3, in 4 and 6 patients, respectively. Six of the 10 patients had previously been treated with IFN-based therapy.

Results

There were no adverse events leading to premature DAA discontinuation. All recipients achieved a sustained viral response 12 weeks after end-of-treatment (SVR12). At the time of LT the median MELD-score was 16.5 (range 7–21), CTP-score 9.0 (range 5–10), creatinine 82.5 μmol/L (range 56–135, reference 60–105), bilirubin 33 μmol/L (range 16–79, reference 5–25) and PK-INR 1.5 (range 1.1–1.8). The median duration of DAA therapy was 60 days (range 18–132) pre-LT, 54 days post-LT (range 8–111 days) and in total 15.5 weeks (range 12–30 weeks).

Conclusion

Interferon-free DAA therapy of HCV-infection given in the immediate pre- and post-operative LT period is safe, well-tolerated and yields high SVR rates.

INF-free sofosbuvir-based treatment of post-transplant hepatitis C relapse - a Swedish real life experience

BACKGROUND

Relapse of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation has been universal, and the fibrosis progression faster than in non-transplanted patients. Interferon (IFN)-free treatment with direct antiviral agents (DAA) has improved the treatment outcome dramatically. We here report on the outcome of IFN-free treatment for HCV relapse after liver transplantation in a real life setting in Sweden.

MATERIAL

In total, 93 patients with a mean age of 60 years (range 32-80) with HCV relapse after liver transplantation were given sofosbuvir-based treatment in combination with a protease inhibitor (simeprevir) or a NS5A inhibitor (daclatasvir or ledipasvir) with or without addition of ribavirin (RBV), or sofosbuvir and RBV only. Treatment was generally given during 24 weeks for advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis cases and 12 weeks for mild fibrosis with fibrosis stage 2 or less. The distribution of genotype 1, 2, 3, 4 in our patients was 58, 7.5, 26.5 and 7.5%, respectively.

RESULTS

All recipients reached end-of-treatment response (ETR) with HCV RNA <15 IU/mL. Sustained viral response 12 weeks after treatment cessation (SVR12) was achieved in 91/93 (97.8%) recipients. The SVR12 rates for genotype 1, 2, 3 and 4 were the SVR12 rate were 96, 100, 100 and 100%, respectively (p = .04).

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that IFN-free treatment with DAAs for HCV relapse after liver transplantation is highly effective also in a real life setting and offers cure for most recipients.

Impact of fibrosis progression on clinical outcome in patients treated for post-transplant hepatitis C recurrence

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients who achieve sustained virological response (SVR) following the treatment of post-liver transplant (LT) recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have improved outcomes. The full impact of eradication of HCV on allograft histology is, however, not clearly known.

METHODS

We studied allograft histology in protocol-based paired liver biopsies in consecutive LT recipients who underwent post-LT treatment of recurrence of HCV.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients were treated with interferon-based therapy for recurrent HCV. Paired pre-treatment baseline biopsies and post-treatment biopsies were available in 83.2% of patients. SVR was achieved in 37.9% of patients. Among the patients who achieved SVR, 20.5% had progression of fibrosis on post-treatment biopsies vs. 65.5% of patients with non-response/relapse (P < 0.001). The impact of virological response on fibrosis progression was sustained and a similar outcome was observed in the subset of patients who had 4-5 year post-treatment biopsies available. In the SVR group, 12.8% progressed to fibrosis stage ≥3 on post-treatment biopsies vs. 37.9% in the non-response/relapse group (P = 0.001). The 5-year survival in patients with progression of fibrosis 86% vs. 98% among patients who had improvement/stable fibrosis [P = 0.003; HR 3.8 (1.2-11.8)]. A small subset of patients who achieve SVR unfortunately still experience progression of fibrosis, most commonly associated with plasma cell hepatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In post-transplant patients treated for HCV, SVR is associated with improved graft survival and also with sustained and significant improvement in histological outcome. Importantly, progression of fibrosis still occurred in a small subset of patients who achieved SVR.

Peg-IFN and ribavirin treatment for recurrence of genotype 2 and 3 hepatitis C after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Relapse of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) is universal. Tolerance for treatment with pegylated-interferon (peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) is suboptimal and withdrawals due to adverse events frequent. We sought to improve tolerance for treatment to improve outcome.

METHODS

We used concentration-guided RBV dosing to achieve an intended 10 μmol/L concentration with darbepoetin support in combination with peg-IFN alfa-2a, 180 μg for genotype 1 and 135 μg for genotype 2/3 to improve tolerance.

RESULTS

A total of 51/54 patients (94%) completed a full treatment course. In the per-protocol analysis 43% of patients (22/51) achieved sustained virological response (SVR), 82% with HCV genotype 2/3 and 22% with genotype 1, p = 0.0001. Patients with IL28B CC achieved SVR in 73% (8/11) and patients with non-CC in 33% (14/43), p = 0.016. Patients with mild fibrosis (fibrosis stage 1-2) achieved SVR in 56% (15/27), and patients with advanced fibrosis (fibrosis stage 3-4) in only 26% (7/27), p = 0.0267.

CONCLUSIONS

Concentration-guided RBV dosing with darbepoetin support substantially improves tolerance and offers high adherence to a full peg-IFN and RBV treatment course in patients with post-transplant HCV relapse. With this approach genotype 2 and 3 infections can be treated cost-effectively post-transplant. Genotype 1, IL28B non-CC genotype, and advanced fibrosis predicted a low SVR rate.

Intent-to-treat analysis of liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma in the MELD era: impact of hepatitis C and advanced status

BACKGROUND/AIM

Liver transplantation is a well-recognized treatment for non-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, the overall survival and waiting list removal rates for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related HCC have not been assessed.

METHODS

The present study included 11,146 patients with HCC and 64,788 patients without HCC, listed for liver transplantation on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database between 2003 and 2010.

RESULTS

In a multivariate analysis, HCV infection was an independent predictor of being transplanted or remaining on the waiting list in HCC candidates (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.60-0.71, p < 0.001). However, patients in the advanced status (model for end-stage liver disease score over 20, tumor stage exceed tumor-node-metastasis stage II, or alpha fetoprotein lover 400 ng/ml) but without HCV had better post-transplant survival than patients in the advanced status and with HCV (64 vs. 47% at 5 years, p < 0.001), and comparable survival to patients with HCV but not in the advanced status (62%, p = 0.461).

CONCLUSIONS

HCC candidates with HCV infection are more likely to be transplanted, remain on the waiting list for longer, and have worse post-transplant survival. Patients in the advanced status but without HCV also could share a similar post-transplant survival to those not in the advanced status but with HCV.

Association of rs12979860 and rs8099917 polymorphisms near IL28B with SVR in hepatic allograft recipients with HCV recurrence undergoing PEG-IFN/RBV therapy: a meta-analysis

The association of rs12979860 and rs8099917 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near IL28B with sustained virological response (SVR) in hepatic allograft recipients undergoing treatment with PEGylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) for recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains inconclusive. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to estimate this association. A search of the literature published prior to November 1, 2013, was conducted using various databases. Eleven eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results revealed that rs12979860 genotype CC in the recipient, donor, and recipient/donor pair was significantly related to high SVR in the recipients (recipient: odds ratio [OR]=3.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.18-4.30; donor: OR=2.65, 95% CI=1.83-3.85; recipient/donor pair: OR=6.05, 95% CI=3.16-11.58). A similar association was observed with rs8099917 genotype TT (recipient: OR=3.84, 95% CI=2.37-6.22; donor: OR=2.44, 95% CI=1.12-5.28; recipient/donor pair: OR=5.43, 95% CI=2.51-11.75). These results suggest that rs12979860 genotype CC and rs8099917 genotype TT contribute to a high SVR in the recipient after antiviral treatment.

Angiotensin blockade does not affect fibrosis progression in recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease is impaired by universal disease recurrence and suboptimal response to antiviral therapy. Inhibition of angiotensin-II signalling by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) or angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARB) decreases hepatic stellate cell activation in vitro and hepatic fibrogenesis in animal models. A single-center retrospective analysis suggested that angiotensin blockade (AB) inhibits fibrosis progression in recurrent HCV post-LT. This study assessed the effect of AB on fibrosis progression in an independent patient cohort.

METHODS

Chart review of all patients who underwent transplantation in our institution for HCV-related ESLD between January 2000 and February 2008 revealed 109 patients with ≥2 protocol liver biopsies and free of antiviral therapy post-LT up to the last biopsy analyzed; 27 of 109 patients were treated with ACE-I/ARB for ≥12 months, 82 were not. Fibrosis was staged using METAVIR.

RESULTS

Live-donor LT was more frequent in controls than in the AB group (25% vs 11%; P < .05). However, parameters known to affect outcome of recurrent HCV, including donor age, prevalence of diabetes, acute cellular rejection, and immunosuppression, were similar in both groups. Time between first and last biopsy (median, 23 months), stage of fibrosis, fibrosis progression rates (median 0.47 vs 0.45 unit/y; P = .46), and time to develop fibrosis stage ≥2 did not differ between groups. Results held true if deceased-donor LT were analyzed separately.

CONCLUSION

Our study does not support the contention of a previous report that use of AB reduces fibrosis progression in recurrent HCV post-LT.

Long term results of liver transplantation for Wilson's disease: experience in France

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver transplantation (LT) is the therapeutic option for severe complications of Wilson's disease (WD). We aimed to report on the long-term outcome of WD patients following LT.

METHODS

The medical records of 121 French patients transplanted for WD between 1985 and 2009 were reviewed retrospectively. Seventy-five patients were adults (median age: 29 years, (18-66)) and 46 were children (median age: 14 years, (7-17)). The indication for LT was (1) fulminant/subfulminant hepatitis (n = 64, 53%), median age = 16 years (7-53), (2) decompensated cirrhosis (n = 50, 41%), median age = 31.5 years (12-66) or (3) severe neurological disease (n = 7, 6%), median age = 21.5 years (14.5-42). Median post-transplant follow-up was 72 months (0-23.5).

RESULTS

Actuarial patient survival rates were 87% at 5, 10, and 15 years. Male gender, pre-transplant renal insufficiency, non elective procedure, and neurological indication were significantly associated with poorer survival rate. None of these factors remained statistically significant under multivariate analysis. In patients transplanted for hepatic indications, the prognosis was poorer in case of fulminant or subfulminant course, non elective procedure, pretransplant renal insufficiency and in patients transplanted before 2000. Multivariate analysis disclosed that only recent period of LT was associated with better prognosis. At last visit, the median calculated glomerular filtration rate was 93 ml/min (33-180); 11/93 patients (12%) had stage II renal insufficiency and none had stage III.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver failure associated with WD is a rare indication for LT (<1%), which achieves an excellent long-term outcome, including renal function.

Evolution of fibrosis during HCV recurrence after liver transplantation--influence of IL-28B SNP and response to peg-IFN and ribavirin treatment

The IL-28 gene is associated with sustained viral response (SVR) after treatment with peg-IFN and ribavirin in liver transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection. We analysed the importance of recipient and donor IL-28B genotype for response to treatment and fibrosis progression in 54 liver transplant recipients. Fibrosis stage (F) was defined as mild when F≤2 and severe when F≥3 in a liver biopsy or according to liver elasticity analysis. We found a significantly lower prevalence of IL-28B SNP CC in the recipients (22%) than in the donors (67%), P<0.0001. SVR was seen in 61% of the recipients with mild and 27% with severe fibrosis pretreatment, P=0.01. Recipients with IL-28 CC and non-CC had mild fibrosis in 64% and 38% prior to treatment, P=0.13. At follow-up, after treatment, significantly more recipients with CC had mild fibrosis than non-CC recipients (75% versus 32%, P=0.0072), and all with CC and SVR had mild fibrosis. The strongest baseline factor predicting SVR was genotype. Hence, 13/19 (68%) genotype non-1 patients reached SVR versus only 9/35 (26%) genotype 1 patients, P=0.0022. In summary, we found that liver transplant recipients with IL-28B CC tended to have less advanced fibrosis prior to and significantly less after SOC treatment and that all recipients with IL-28B CC who achieved SVR had mild fibrosis at follow-up. A significantly higher SVR rate was achieved in recipients with mild than severe fibrosis pretreatment and with genotype non-1 than 1 infection. Our findings indicate that treatment for post-transplant HCV recurrence should be offered before advanced fibrosis is seen in the recipient.

Hepatitis C infection and hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplantation: a 20-year experience

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C infection (HCV) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the two main causes of liver transplantation (LT), have reduced survival post-LT. The impact of HCV, HCC and their coexistence on post-LT survival were assessed.

METHODOLOGY

All 601 LT patients from 1992 to 2011 were reviewed. Those deceased within 30 days (n = 69) and re-transplants (n = 49) were excluded. Recipients were divided into four groups: (a) HCC-/HCV-(n = 252) (b) HCC+/HCV- (n = 58), (c) HCC-/HCV+ (n = 106) and (d) HCC+/HCV+ (n = 67). Demographics, the donor risk index (DRI), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, survival, complications and tumour characteristics were collected. Statistical analysis included anova, chi-square, Fisher's exact tests and Cox and Kaplan-Meier for overall survival.

RESULTS

Groups were comparable with regards to baseline characteristics, but HCC patients were older. After adjusting for age, MELD, gender and the donor risk index (DRI), survival was lower in the HCC+/HCV+ group (59.5% at 5 yrs) and the hazard ratio (HR) was 1.90 [95% confidence interval (CI),1.24-2.95, P = 0.003] and 1.45 (95% CI, 0.99-2.12, P = 0.054) for HCC-/HCV+. HCC survival was similar to controls (HR 1.18, 95% CI, 0.71-1.93, P = 0.508). HCC+/HCV- patients exceeded the Milan criteria (50% versus 31%, P < 0.04) and had more micro-vascular invasion (37.5% versus 20.6%, P = 0.042). HCC+/HCV+ versus HCC+/HCV- survival remained lower (HR 1.94, 95% CI, 1.06-3.81, P = 0.041) after correcting for tumour characteristics and treatment.

CONCLUSION

HCV patients had lower survival post-LT. HCC alone had no impact on survival. Patient survival decreased in the HCC+/HCV+ group and this appears to be as a consequence of HCV recurrence.

Concentration-guided ribavirin dosing with darbepoetin support and peg-IFN alfa-2a for treatment of hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

Relapse of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation is universal. Standard-of-care (SOC) treatment for relapse offers less satisfactory treatment response than in nontransplanted patients. Tolerance for treatment is suboptimal and withdrawals owing to adverse events induced by treatment frequent. To improve tolerance for SOC, and ribavirin (RBV) in particular, concentration-guided RBV dosing calculated by a formula taking renal function and weight into consideration was utilized. A serum RBV concentration of 10 μm was set as the goal. All patients were given maintenance darbepoetin therapy from 2 weeks prior to initiation of treatment. In total, 21 patients with a mean age of 52 (range 25-64) years were included. The mean RBV concentration at week 4 was 10.2 and 7.36 μm in genotype 1/4 and non-1/4 patients, respectively, and 11.7 and 9.42 at week 12. The mean haemoglobin drop was 25 g/L vs 21 g/L in the genotype 1/4 and non-1/4 group, respectively, a nonsignificant difference. With this treatment approach, 80-90% of patients could be kept adherent to treatment. Sustained viral response was achieved 8/16 (50%) with low-grade fibrosis (fibrosis stage ≤ 2) vs in none of five patients with advanced fibrosis (Fibrosis stage 3 and 4), P < 0.05. We conclude that a treatment algorithm utilizing concentration-guided RBV dosing during darbepoetin maintenance therapy substantially improves tolerance and allows high adherence to a SOC treatment schedule, and that therapy needs to be initiated before advanced fibrosis is developed.

Impact of donor histology on survival following liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a Scandinavian single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

Survival following liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is affected by several factors. The aims of this single-center study were to evaluate survival from 1992 to 2006 in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients and to identify factors influencing patient and graft survival, with particular focus on donor liver histopathology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Survival among 84 patients transplanted for HCV-related liver disease at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital during the above period was evaluated. Median follow-up time was 57 months (range 28-87). A perioperative liver biopsy from the donor liver graft was available in 68 cases. Biopsies were assessed for fibrosis, necroinflammatory activity, and degree of steatosis. Patient and graft survival according to relevant factors including donor histopathology were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

We found an association between donor liver fibrosis and patient survival (p = 0.016) as well as between graft survival and portal inflammation in the donor liver (p = 0.026). Both these associations remained significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.007 and 0.017 respectively). Moreover, recipient age over 60 was found predictive of patient survival and repeated steroid boluses or steroid-resistant rejection of graft survival. Donor age was high throughout the study period.

CONCLUSION

Histopathological features, especially portal inflammation and stage of fibrosis, in the donor liver may deleteriously affect graft and patient survival following HCV-related liver transplantation. Thus, pretransplant evaluation of donor histopathology may be of value in the selection of donors for transplantation of HCV-positive individuals, especially among donors older than 60 years.

Spanish society of liver transplantation (SETH) consensus recommendations on hepatitis C virus and liver transplantation

In November 2010, the Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation (Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, SETH) held a consensus conference. One of the topics of debate was liver transplantation in patients with hepatitis C. This document reviews (i) the natural history of post-transplant hepatitis C, (ii) factors associated with post-transplant prognosis in patients with hepatitis C, (iii) the role of immunosuppression in the evolution of recurrent hepatitis C and response to antiviral therapy, (iv) antiviral therapy, both before and after transplantation, (v) follow-up of patients with recurrent hepatitis C and (vi) the role of retransplantation.

Liver transplantation and hepatitis C

Hepatitis-C-virus- (HCV-) related end-stage cirrhosis is the primary indication for liver transplantation in many countries. Unfortunately, however, HCV is not eliminated by transplantation and graft reinfection is universal, resulting in fibrosis, cirrhosis, and finally graft decompensation. The use of poor quality organs, particularly from older donors, has a highly negative impact on the severity of recurrence and patient/graft survival. Although immunosuppressive regimens have a considerable impact on the outcome, the optimal regimen after liver transplantation for HCV-infected patients remains unclear. Disease progression monitoring with protocol biopsy and new noninvasive methods is essential for predicting patient/graft outcome and starting antiviral treatment with the appropriate timing. Antiviral treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is currently considered the most promising regimen with a sustained viral response rate of around 30% to 35%, although the survival benefit of this regimen remains to be investigated. Living-donor liver transplantation is now widely accepted as an established treatment for HCV cirrhosis and the results are equivalent to those of deceased donor liver transplantation.

Effect of tacrolimus on survival in hepatitis C-infected patients after liver transplantation

The observation that cyclosporine inhibits HCV replication in vitro has led some programs to use cyclosporine as the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) of choice after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Previous studies comparing outcomes with different CNIs used small HCV cohorts or had short-term follow-up. We examined patient survival and fibrosis progression in all HCV-infected adult primary OLT recipients from 1995 to 2004 at the Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute (n = 516). Patients were categorized by their CNI on day 7 post-OLT, and they were excluded if they died before day 14. Patient and donor age, sex, race, and prevalence of cytomegalovirus infection post-OLT were similar in the tacrolimus and cyclosporine patients. As expected, acute cellular rejection and steroid-resistant rejection were less common in tacrolimus-treated patients. Although no difference in 1-year survival was seen, tacrolimus patients (n = 268) had superior 5-year survival compared to cyclosporine patients (n = 248) (75% vs. 67%; P = 0.02). Fibrosis progression was no different between the groups. In our retrospective analysis of 516 post-OLT patients, tacrolimus improved long-term survival compared to cyclosporine in HCV-infected patients, although it did not impact HCV fibrosis progression.

Immune-mediated complications of the graft in interferon-treated hepatitis C positive liver transplant recipients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) re-infection of the graft is universal and interferon based antiviral therapy remains at present the treatment of choice in HCV liver transplant recipients. Apart from the antiviral effects, interferon and ribavirin have both potent immunomodulatory properties resulting in a broad range of immune-related disorders including acute cellular rejection and chronic ductopenic rejection as well as de novo autoimmune hepatitis. Further complicating the picture, HCV infection per se is associated with a variety of autoimmune phenomena. We discuss here the immune-mediated complications and their relationship to chronic HCV and interferon based antiviral therapy.

Flexible and individualized treatment to achieve sustained viral response for recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients

Hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation is universal and is a major cause of long-term graft failure. Improving the effectiveness of recurrent hepatitis C treatment is extremely important. We studied 35 anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients who underwent liver transplantation. Among the 35 patients, 25 patients had recurrent hepatitis C and received antiviral treatment. HCV RNA load after liver transplantation was increased by 3.68-fold. The antiviral treatment regimen comprised pegylated-interferon (180 μg) every 2 weeks and ribavirin at a dose of 200-400 mg every day. The treatment duration was flexible and individualized, and depended on viral response to treatment. The dosage of tacrolimus was decreased gradually to minimize immunocompromise. Median (interquartile) serum level of tacrolimus was 6.9 (6-8.9) ng/mL at initiation of treatment and 3.8 (3.6-5) ng/mL at the end of treatment. One patient (4.0%) was withdrawn from the study, and three patients (12%) died of infection during treatment. At end of treatment, 18 of 25 patients (72%) were negative for serum HCV RNA. After an additional 6 months following the end of treatment, 16 of the 25 patients (64%) had sustained viral response (SVR) and only two patients had HCV relapse. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 91.4%, 84.5% and 84.5% for all patients and 88.0%, 82.8% and 82.8% for the 25 patients who received antiviral therapy. In conclusion, recurrent HCV infection is an important issue in liver transplantation. The flexible regimen of antiviral therapy and individualized immunosuppressive agents that was applied in this study achieved a SVR rate of 64%.

In patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 infection and RVR 14 weeks treatment is noninferior to 24 weeks. Pooled analysis of two Scandinavian trials

AIM

To compare 14 and 24 weeks treatment to patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 infection and rapid virological response (RVR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients included in two Scandinavian trials, one nonrandomized pilot trial (n=122) and one randomized controlled trial (RCT) (n=428) were entered into a pooled database. In both trials treatment naïve patients with genotype 2 or 3 were treated with pegylated interferon alpha 2b (1.5 microg/kg, subcutaneous) weekly and ribavirin (800-1400 mg, orally) daily. Primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR). RVR was defined as HCV RNA less than 50 IU/ml after 4 weeks of treatment. In the pilot trial all patients with RVR were treated for 14 weeks and in the RCT patients with RVR were randomised to either 14 or 24 weeks treatment. Patients treated per protocol were included in the primary analysis. The noninferiority margin was set to be 10% between the two groups with a one-sided 5% significance level.

RESULTS

In patients with RVR and genotype 2 or 3 SVR was obtained in 181 of 199 (91.0%) and 93 of 98 (94.9%) after 14 and 24 weeks treatment, respectively. The observed difference in SVR rates was 3.9% (90% confidence interval: +1 to -8.8). The relapse rate was highest among those older than 40 years and those with genotype 3 and high viral load, but prolongation of treatment from 14 to 24 weeks did not reduce the relapse rate substantially in any of these groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 infection and RVR 14 weeks treatment is noninferior to 24 weeks.

Post-liver transplant survival in hepatitis C patients is improving over time

Outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis C have been reported to be worsening over the last 2 decades. We analyzed our center's experience over 15 years to identify trends in post-orthotopic liver transplantation survival in patients with and without hepatitis C virus infection. Patient survival and graft survival among adult primary orthotopic liver transplantation recipients who survived more than 90 days from January 1991 to June 2006 at the Baylor Regional Transplant Institute (n = 1901) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Those with or without hepatitis C virus infection were analyzed by era: era 1, 1991-1994 (n = 473); era 2, 1995-1998 (n = 421); era 3, 1999-2002 (n = 498); and era 4, 2003-2006 (n = 512). Differences in eras with disparate survivals were assessed by univariate and multivariable analysis. Overall, patient survival and graft survival were significantly lower among hepatitis C virus infection recipients compared to those without hepatitis C virus infection (P < 0.001). This difference was dependent on the era of transplantation, with progressive improvement in hepatitis C virus patient (P < 0.001) and graft (P < 0.001) survival in sequential eras. Several factors accounted for this improvement, notably better selection of hepatocellular carcinoma patients and fewer late cytomegalovirus infections. Improvement occurred despite an increase in the ages of both donors and recipients. In conclusion, posttransplant survival after orthotopic liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis C has improved significantly over the last 15 years despite demographic changes in patients and grafts that have been previously shown to impair survival. A major reason for this improvement is better selection of patients with concurrent hepatocellular carcinoma and fewer late cytomegalovirus infections, although other factors may play a role as well.

The natural history of recurrent hepatitis C and what influences this

1. Liver failure and liver cancer from chronic hepatitis C are the most common indications for liver transplantation and numbers of both are projected to double over the next 20 years. 2. Recurrent hepatitis C infection of the allograft is universal and immediate following liver transplantation and associated with accelerated progression to cirrhosis, graft loss and death. 3. Graft and patient survival is reduced in liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV infection compared to HCV-negative recipients. 4. The natural history of chronic hepatitis C is accelerated following liver transplantation compared C, with 20% progressing to cirrhosis by 5 years. However, the rate of fibrosis progression is not uniform and may increase over time. 5. The rates of progression from cirrhosis to decompensation and from decompensation to death are also accelerated following liver transplantation. 6. Multiple host, donor and viral factors are associated with rapid fibrosis progression and HCV-related graft failure. 7. Over the last decade, graft and patient survival rates have improved following liver transplantation for non-HCV disease but not for HCV-cirrhosis. This may reflect worsening donor quality and changes in immunosuppression strategies over recent years. 8. Viral eradication by antiviral therapy prevents disease progression and improves survival. 9. The severity of recurrent hepatitis C at one year post-transplant predicts subsequent progression to cirrhosis. Annual protocol biopsies are recommended to help determine need for antiviral therapy. 10. The projected impact of recurrent hepatitis C on graft and patient survival can only be avoided by the development of safe and effective antiviral strategies which can both prevent initial graft infection and eradicate established hepatitis C recurrence.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver transplantation has emerged as an optimal treatment for stage I and II hepatocellular carcinoma for patients with underlying cirrhosis as it provides a treatment for the underlying liver disease as well as a reduced incidence of recurrent cancer. The current system of organ allocation in the United States allows an opportunity for liver transplantation for patients with tumor burden within the Milan criteria (a single tumor 2-5 cm or up to 3 lesions with none >3 cm). Outcomes of patients receiving transplants within these criteria approach outcomes for patients receiving transplants for all indications (85.9%, 74.8%, and 64.1% actuarial survival at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, for those with HCC receiving transplants compared with 82%, 73%, and 67% for the entire cohort). Transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, and other pretransplant treatment modalities aimed to slowing tumor growth for patients on a transplant waiting list are commonly used, although the impact on pretransplant disease progression or posttransplant survival remains uncertain. There is continued controversy over expanding patient selection criteria, in particular for those who have undergone downstaging of tumors. In addition, the role of certain immunosuppressive agents such as sirolimus in the reducing HCC recurrence posttransplant remains unclear.