Patients with liver cirrhosis suffer from primary haemostatic defects? Fact or fiction?

Comprehensive investigation of platelet function in patients with cirrhosis

Cirrhosis presents with thrombocytopenia and possibly thrombocytopathy. Previous studies exploring platelet function gave conflicting results and most controversies are explained by the variety of methods employed for investigation. We sought to assess in-vitro the overall platelet function in cirrhosis. We investigated 34 patients by using the following tests. (i)Aggregometry. (ii)Measurement of the content of platelet granules. (iii)Cytometric platelet activation. (iv)Plasmatic markers of in-vivo platelet activation. (v)Platelet procoagulant activity by thrombin generation (TG) in platelet-rich plasma (PRP). TG measured in PRP for patients and controls was similar. Platelets from patients with cirrhosis showed reduction of aggregation and secretion of ATP. Similar results were observed for platelet activation parameters such as P-selectin expression and PAC-1 platelet binding. Plasma levels of βeta-thromboglobulin and soluble P-selectin, were increased in patients-vs-controls. In contrast, there were no patients-vs-controls differences for plasmatic platelet-factor-4. Results are consistent with a state of in-vivo platelet activation and decreased in-vitro aggregation. Since bleeding events following invasive procedures are uncommon in cirrhosis, we speculate that in-vitro aggregometry testing does not reflect the situation occurring in-vivo. Results of the study and pathophysiological considerations support the conclusion that platelet function in cirrhosis as determined by aggregometry, although somewhat impaired, may support the overall hemostatic potential, which is needed for most invasive interventions. These conclusions are in line with the recommendations of international guidelines, warning against indiscriminate use of prophylactic preprocedural administration of platelets before invasive procedures. Decision on platelet support should not be made based on in-vitro laboratory testing for platelet function.

Biomarkers of Hepatic Toxicity: An Overview

Background

Hepatotoxicity is the foremost issue for clinicians and the primary reason for pharmaceutical product recalls. A biomarker is a measurable and quantifiable attribute used to evaluate the efficacy of a treatment or to diagnose a disease. There are various biomarkers which are used for the detection of liver disease and the intent of liver damage.

Objective

This review aims to investigate the current state of hepatotoxicity biomarkers and their utility in clinical settings. Using hepatic biomarkers, the presence of liver injury, its severity, prognosis, causative agent, and type of hepatotoxicity can all be determined.

Methods

Relevant published articles up to 2022 were systematically retrieved from MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and WOS databases using keywords such as drug toxicity, hepatotoxicity biomarkers, biochemical parameters, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Results

In clinical trials and everyday practice, biomarkers of drug-induced liver injury are essential for spotting the most severe cases of hepatotoxicity. Hence, developing novel biomarker approaches to enhance hepatotoxicity diagnosis will increase specificity and/or identify the person at risk. Importantly, early clinical studies on patients with liver illness have proved that some biomarkers such as aminotransferase, bilirubin, albumin, and bile acids are even therapeutically beneficial.

Conclusions

By assessing the unique signs of liver injury, health care professionals can rapidly and accurately detect liver damage and evaluate its severity. These measures contribute to ensuring prompt and effective medical intervention, hence reducing the risk of long-term liver damage and other major health concerns.

Combined metabolomic and proteomic analysis of sepsis related acute liver injury and its pathogenesis research

BACKGROUND

Sepsis-induced acute liver injury is common in patients in intensive care units. However, the exact mechanism of this condition remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the roles and mechanisms of proteins and metabolites in the liver tissue of mice after sepsis and elucidate the molecular biological mechanisms of sepsis-related liver injury.

METHODS

First, a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sepsis mouse model was established. Then, according to alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) detection in mouse serum and liver histopathological examination (HE) staining, the septic mice were divided into two groups: acute liver injury after sepsis and nonacute liver injury after sepsis. Metabolomics and proteomic analyses were performed on the liver tissues of the two groups of mice to identify significantly different metabolites and proteins. The metabolomics and proteomics results were further analysed to identify the biological indicators and pathogenesis related to the occurrence and development of sepsis-related acute liver injury at the protein and metabolite levels.

RESULTS

A total of 14 differentially expressed proteins and 46 differentially expressed metabolites were identified. Recombinant Erythrocyte Membrane Protein Band 4.2 (Epb42) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) may be the key proteins and metabolites responsible for sepsis-related acute liver injury, according to the correlation analysis of proteomics and metabolomics. The expression of the differential protein Epb42 was further verified by western blot (WB) detection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the differential protein Epb42 may be key proteins causing sepsis-associated acute liver injury, providing new and valuable information on the possible mechanism of sepsis-associated acute liver injury.

The evolving knowledge on primary hemostasis in patients with cirrhosis: A comprehensive review

Patients with cirrhosis develop complex alterations in primary hemostasis that include both hypocoagulable and hypercoagulable features. This includes thrombocytopenia, multiple alterations of platelet function, and increased plasma levels of von Willebrand factor. Contrary to the historical view that platelet dysfunction in cirrhosis might be responsible for an increased bleeding tendency, the current theory posits a rebalanced hemostasis in patients with cirrhosis. Severe thrombocytopenia is not indicative of the bleeding risk in patients undergoing invasive procedures and does not dictate per se the need for pre-procedural prophylaxis. A more comprehensive and individualized risk assessment should combine hemostatic impairment, the severity of decompensation and systemic inflammation, and the presence of additional factors that may impair platelet function, such as acute kidney injury and bacterial infections. Although there are multiple, complex alterations of platelet function in cirrhosis, their net effect is not yet fully understood. More investigations evaluating the association between alterations of platelet function and bleeding/thrombosis may improve risk stratification in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Besides hemostasis, the assessment of von Willebrand factor Ag and ADP-induced, whole-blood platelet aggregation normalized by platelet count (VITRO score and PLT ratio) are promising biomarkers to predict the risk of hepatic decompensation and survival in both compensated and decompensated patients. Further investigations into the in vivo interplay between platelets, circulating blood elements, and endothelial cells may help advance our understanding of cirrhotic coagulopathy. Here, we review the complex changes in platelets and primary hemostasis in cirrhosis and their potential clinical implications.

Comparative proteomics reveals different protein expression in platelets in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

The role of platelets in disease progression as well as the function of platelets as part of the haemostatic and immunological system in patients with liver cirrhosis is only incompletely understood. This is partly due to difficulties in assessing platelet function. Proteome analyses of platelets have been used to further investigate the role of platelets in other diseases.

AIM

To assess possible changes in the platelet proteome during different stages of alcohol induced liver cirrhosis compared to healthy donors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 45 ml blood sample was drawn from 18 participants aged 18-80 years evenly divided into three groups of healthy donors, patients with less advanced alcohol induced liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh < 7) and patients with advanced liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh > 10). The blood was processed to isolate platelets and perform subsequent two-dimensional gel-electrophoresis using a SYPRO™ Ruby dye. After computational analysation significantly in- or decreased protein spots (defined as a two-fold abundance change between different study cohorts and ANOVA < 0.05) were identified via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS) and searching against human protein databases.

RESULTS

The comparative analysis identified four platelet proteins with progressively decreased protein expression in patients with liver cirrhosis. More specifically Ras-related protein Rab-7a (Rab-7a), Ran-specific binding protein 1 (RANBP1), Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 1 (RhoGDI1), and 14-3-3 gamma.

CONCLUSION

There is significant change in protein expression in the platelet proteome throughout the disease progression of alcohol induced liver cirrhosis. The identified proteins are possibly involved in haemostatic and immunoregulatory function of platelets.

Reappraisal of the conventional hemostasis tests as predictors of perioperative bleeding in the era of rebalanced hemostasis in cirrhosis

New global laboratory procedures mimicking the in vivo hemostasis process led to the changing paradigm of cirrhosis from the prototype of hemorrhagic diseases to a condition in which hemostasis is normal but fragile, thus justifying the hemorrhagic/thrombotic tendencies that affect these patients. The new paradigm was instrumental to change the management of cirrhosis. For example, international guidelines warn against the entrenched practice of testing patients with conventional hemostasis tests and infusing those with abnormalities with fresh-frozen plasma, coagulation factor concentrates, or platelets, prior to surgery/invasive procedures. These recommendations are, however, largely disattended. The practice of testing patients with the prothrombin time or viscoelastometry and using arbitrary cutoffs to make decisions on perioperative prophylaxis is still common and probably driven by medicolegal issues. There is no doubt that prothrombin time and congeners tests are unable to predict bleeding in cirrhosis. However, it cannot be excluded that some tests may be useful in patients who are severely decompensated. Large prospective collaborative studies are warranted. Enrolled patients should be randomized to receive perioperative prophylaxis based on laboratory testing (eg, viscoelastometry, thrombomodulin-modified thrombin generation) or to usual care. However, for these trials to be useful, a third group of patients who do not receive prophylaxis should be included. In conclusion, until results from these studies are available, physicians attending cirrhosis should refrain from using laboratory tests with arbitrary cutoffs to make decision on perioperative prophylaxis. Decision should be made by considering the clinical history of individual patients and the risk of hemorrhage of specific procedures.

Macrophages and platelets in liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma

During fibrosis, (myo)fibroblasts deposit large amounts of extracellular matrix proteins, thereby replacing healthy functional tissue. In liver fibrosis, this leads to the loss of hepatocyte function, portal hypertension, variceal bleeding, and increased susceptibility to infection. At an early stage, liver fibrosis is a dynamic and reversible process, however, from the cirrhotic stage, there is significant progression to hepatocellular carcinoma. Both liver-resident macrophages (Kupffer cells) and monocyte-derived macrophages are important drivers of fibrosis progression, but can also induce its regression once triggers of chronic inflammation are eliminated. In liver cancer, they are attracted to the tumor site to become tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) polarized towards a M2- anti-inflammatory/tumor-promoting phenotype. Besides their role in thrombosis and hemostasis, platelets can also stimulate fibrosis and tumor development by secreting profibrogenic factors and regulating the innate immune response, e.g., by interacting with monocytes and macrophages. Here, we review recent literature on the role of macrophages and platelets and their interplay in liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Decreased Platelet Aggregation in Patients with Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis and TIPS Implantation

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation is an effective treatment of portal hypertension in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. However, some patients develop TIPS thrombosis with recurrence of portal hypertension. The role of platelets in TIPS thrombosis and the necessity of antiplatelet therapy is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to study platelet function in patients with liver cirrhosis prior to and after TIPS implantation. Platelet aggregation was tested in peripheral and portal-vein blood patient samples on the day (D) of TIPS implantation (D0), D4 and D30 following the procedure (platelet count above 100 × 103/µL, aspirin starting on D5) using whole-blood impedance aggregometry (WBIA) and light transmission aggregometry (LTA). In addition, surface platelet activation markers (P-selectin, activated GPIIb/IIIa) and platelet-neutrophil complexes (PNCs) were assessed by flow cytometry. Thrombin receptor activating peptide 6 (TRAP-6), adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid (AA) were used as agonists. Healthy subjects were included as controls. Agonist-induced platelet aggregation was reduced (WBIA: TRAP-6 p < 0.01, ADP p < 0.01, AA p < 0.001; LTA: TRAP-6 p = 0.13, ADP p = 0.05, AA p < 0.01) in patients (D0, n = 13) compared with healthy subjects (n = 9). While surface activation markers at baseline were negligibly low, the percentage of PNCs was higher in patients than in controls (p < 0.05). ADP-induced P-selectin expression was increased (p < 0.001), whereas TRAP-6-induced GPIIb/IIIa activation was impaired (p < 0.001) in patients versus controls. PNC formation in response to agonists was not different between groups. Results did not differ between peripheral and portal-vein blood of patients (D0, n = 11) and did not change over time (D0, D4, D30) following TIPS implantation (n = 9). In summary, patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis display in vitro platelet aggregation defects in response to various agonists. Defective aggregation persists upon TIPS implantation. Therefore, we conclude that antiplatelet treatment to prevent TIPS thrombosis is questionable.

Viscoelastometry to Manage Bleeding in Liver Disease

A state of "re-balanced haemostasis" describes complex coagulation changes that arise in patients with liver disease. Changes include alterations in procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins, platelets and von Willebrand factor, as well as the fibrinolytic system. Various circumstances including infection, trauma, or surgery may disrupt this balance and predispose an individual to bleeding or thrombosis. The prothrombin time, international normalised ratio, and activated partial thromboplastin time are conventional coagulation screening tests that are routinely employed by clinicians to investigate unexplained bleeding, monitor anticoagulation, and inform preoperative assessments of bleeding risk. These standard coagulation tests assess quantitative defects in procoagulant clotting factors and are insensitive to levels of natural anticoagulants, which together with procoagulant factors, are often perturbed in liver disease. Therefore, the prolongation of clotting times measured by these tests often does not reflect the multifaceted alterations of haemostasis in these patients. Viscoelastic testing (VET) provides a more encompassing assessment of clotting function by recording real-time viscoelastic changes in whole blood and includes parameters that provide information on coagulation factor function, platelet contribution to clot formation, as well as fibrinolysis. To date, VET has been employed to predict and inform transfusion support in obstetric, trauma, and cardiac surgical fields, and its use in patients undergoing liver transplantation is well established. The ability of VET to accurately predict bleeding risk and precisely guide transfusion algorithms for patients with liver disease undergoing other invasive procedures or experiencing bleeding complications has been the topic of research over the last decade. This review is a critical summary of this data and provides a detailed snapshot of the position of VET as a clinical tool in patients with liver disease.

Anticoagulation in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: Friend or Foe?

Concepts regarding the status of the coagulation process in cirrhosis are rapidly changing. Instead of a disease defined by excessive bleeding risk, recent studies have shown cirrhosis to be associated with a fragile state of rebalanced hemostasis, easily swayed in either direction, thrombosis, or bleeding. These findings, combined with the ever-growing population of patients with cirrhosis with an indication for anticoagulation (AC) and the emergence of the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease epidemic, have prompted a reexamination of the use of AC in patients with cirrhosis, either as a treatment for a concurrent thrombotic disorder or even as a possible therapeutic option that could influence the natural course of the disease and its complications. In recent years, a significant number of studies have been formulated to evaluate these possibilities. These studies evaluated, among others, the efficacy and safety of AC in thrombotic disorders or thrombotic complications of cirrhosis, its effect on survival, and the class of anticoagulants which is more suitable for patients with cirrhosis, depending on disease severity. This review examines recent studies investigating the use of AC in patients with cirrhosis and attempts to provide a simple guide for clinicians regarding the use of AC in patients with cirrhosis and its potential risks and benefits.

Anticoagulant therapy for splanchnic vein thrombosis: recent updates for patients with liver cirrhosis

INTRODUCTION

Liver cirrhosis is accompanied by several hemostatic alterations, which contribute to the current theory of "rebalanced hemostasis." Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a frequent complication of liver cirrhosis (17-26% of the cirrhotic patients), and liver cirrhosis is a common risk factor for SVT (24-28% of SVT cases).

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review aims to describe the current state of the art on the anticoagulant treatment of cirrhotic SVT, with a particular focus on the possible role of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and recent guidelines on this topic.

EXPERT OPINION

Early anticoagulant therapy is recommended in cirrhotic patients with acute SVT, to obtain vessel recanalization and decrease the rates of portal hypertension-related complications. Gastroesophageal varices do not represent a contraindication to anticoagulation, if adequate prophylaxis of variceal bleeding is established, and varices band ligation can be safely performed without the need to stop the anticoagulant treatment. The conventional treatment of cirrhotic SVT consisted of low molecular weight heparin, as initial treatment of choice, eventually followed by vitamin K antagonists, but the DOACs can be considered as a reasonable alternative in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis.

Gut dysbiosis, endotoxemia and clotting activation: A dangerous trio for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis

Liver cirrhosis (LC) is associated with portal venous thrombosis (PVT) in roughly 20% of cirrhotic patients but the underlying mechanism is still unclear. Low-grade endotoxemia by lipopolysaccharides (LPS), a component of outer gut microbiota membrane, is detectable in the portal circulation of LC and could predispose to PVT. LPS may translocate into systemic circulation upon microbiota dysbiosis-induced gut barrier dysfunction, that is a prerequisite for enhanced gut permeability and ensuing endotoxemia. Experimental and clinical studies provided evidence that LPS behaves a pro-thrombotic molecule so promoting clotting and platelet activation. Experiments conducted in the portal circulation of cirrhotic patients showed the existence of LPS-related enhanced thrombin generation as well as endothelial dysfunction, venous stasis, and platelet activation. The review will analyze 1) the pro-thrombotic role of endotoxemia in the context of LC 2) the biological plausibility linking endotoxemia with PVT and 3) the potentially interventional tools to lower endotoxemia and eventually hypercoagulation.

Rational hemostatic management in cirrhosis: from old paradigms to new clinical challenges

INTRODUCTION

Patients with cirrhosis are at risk of both thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. Traditional hemostatic tests are inadequate to assess the complex and fragile balance of hemostasis in this setting, especially in advanced stages of disease such as decompensated cirrhosis or acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF). Furthermore, the indiscriminate use of pro-hemostatic agents for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes is still debated and often contraindicated. Alongside, splanchnic, and peripheral thrombotic events are frequent in this population and require management that involves a careful balance between risks and benefits of antithrombotic therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to address the state of the art on the clinical management of the hemostatic balance of cirrhosis in terms of established knowledge and future challenges.

EXPERT OPINION

The old paradigm of cirrhosis as a naturally anticoagulated condition has been challenged by more sophisticated global tests of hemostasis. Integrating this information in the clinical decision-making is still challenging for physicians and experts in hemostasis.

Platelets as a Gauge of Liver Disease Kinetics?

A multitude of laboratory and clinical interferences influence the utility of platelet-based diagnostic indices, including immature platelet fraction, in longitudinal monitoring and prognostication of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). The complex yet highly regulated molecular basis of platelet production and clearance kinetics becomes dysregulated in liver pathogenesis. These underlying molecular mechanisms, including premature platelet clearance and bone marrow suppression in parallel with the progressive (e.g., treatment-naïve) or regressive (e.g., on-treatment and off-treatment) disease courses, involved in CLDs, may further confound the changes in platelet–liver correlations over time. Platelet count and function are commonly and secondarily altered in vivo in CLDs. However, the precise characterization of platelet functions during cirrhosis, including in vitro platelet aggregation, has proven challenging due to interferences such as thrombocytopenia. A flow cytometric approach may help monitor the unstably rebalanced hyper- and hypoaggregable states in patients with cirrhosis at risk of hyperaggregable, prothrombotic, or bleeding events. Studies have attempted to stratify patients with cirrhosis by substages and prognosis through the use of novel indices such as the ratio of in vitro endogenous platelet aggregation to platelet count. This review attempts to highlight clinical and laboratory precautions in the context of platelet-assisted CLD monitoring.

B cell-activating factor is involved in thrombocytopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis

Liver cirrhosis (LC) involves B cells that produce anti-glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antibodies, found in primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The role of autoimmunity in the pathology of thrombocytopenia in LC was investigated using 25 LC patients with thrombocytopenia, 18 ITP patients, and 30 healthy controls. Anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibody-producing B cells were quantified using enzyme-linked immunospot assay. Platelet-associated and plasma anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibody, plasma B cell-activating factor (BAFF), and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. B cell subset fractions and regulatory T cells (Tregs) were quantified using flow cytometry.The number of anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibody-producing B cells was significantly higher in LC patients than in ITP patients and healthy controls (both p < 0.001). Platelet-associated anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies were significantly higher in LC patients than in ITP patients and healthy controls (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively). BAFF levels were significantly higher in LC patients than in ITP patients and healthy controls (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), and APRIL levels were significantly higher in LC patients than in healthy controls (p < 0.001). Anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibody-producing B cells and platelet-associated anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies were positively correlated with BAFF levels in LC patients. LC patients had more naïve B cells and plasmablasts than healthy controls (p = 0.005, p = 0.03, respectively); plasmablasts were positively correlated with BAFF levels. LC patients had similar Tregs levels as ITP patients and healthy controls. Therefore, excessive BAFF production in LC patients with thrombocytopenia is likely associated with autoimmune B cell response, inducing anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibody production.

Association of endoscopic variceal treatment with portal venous system thrombosis in liver cirrhosis: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

The association of endoscopic variceal treatment (EVT) with portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) in liver cirrhosis is still unclear.

METHODS

PVST was assessed by contrast-enhanced CT or MRI in 406 cirrhotic patients from our prospective database. Case and control groups, which are defined as patients with and without PVST, respectively, were matched at a ratio of 1:1 according to age, gender, Child-Pugh class, and MELD score. History of EVT was reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for PVST. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were further performed in terms of degree and location of PVST.

RESULTS

Overall, 109 patients each were included in case and control groups. The case group had a significantly higher proportion of patients who had undergone EVT than the control group (53.2% versus 18.3%; p < 0.001). In detail, the case group had significantly higher proportions of patients who had undergone EVT for controlling bleeding (45.9% versus 14.7%; p < 0.001), endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) alone (19.3% versus 9.2%; p = 0.033), and EVL combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate glue injection (24.8% versus 5.5%; p < 0.001). EVT was independently associated with PVST (OR = 4.258; p < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, EVT remained independently associated with partial PVST (OR = 10.063; p < 0.001), complete PVST/fibrotic cord (OR = 4.889; p = 0.008), thrombosis within main portal vein (OR = 5.985; p < 0.001), and thrombosis within superior mesenteric and splenic veins (OR = 5.747; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

EVT may lead to a higher risk of PVST, especially more severe PVST, in liver cirrhosis. Screening for and prophylaxis of PVST after EVT should be further explored.

Pathophysiology and management of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with liver disease

Patients with liver disease often develop complex changes in their haemostatic system. Frequently observed changes include thrombocytopaenia and altered plasma levels of most of the proteins involved in haemostasis. Although liver disease was historically classified as a haemostasis‐related bleeding disorder, it has now been well established that the antihaemostatic changes that promote bleeding are compensated for by prohaemostatic changes. Conventional coagulation tests however do not accurately reflect these prohaemostatic changes, resulting in an underestimation of haemostatic potential. Novel coagulation tests, such as viscoelastic tests (VETs) and thrombin generation assays (TGAs) better reflect the net result of the haemostatic changes in patients with liver disease, and demonstrate a new, “rebalanced” haemostatic status. Although rebalanced, this haemostatic status is more fragile than in patients without liver disease. Patients with liver disease are therefore not only at risk of bleeding but also at risk of thrombosis. Notably, however, many haemostatic complications in liver disease are not related to the haemostatic failure. It is, therefore, crucial to identify the cause of the bleed or thrombotic complication in order to provide adequate treatment. In this paper, we will elaborate on the haemostatic changes that occur in liver disease, reflect on laboratory and clinical studies over the last few years, and explore the pathophysiologies of bleeding and thrombosis in this specific patient group.

Cirrhosis and Coagulopathy: Mechanisms of Hemostasis Changes in Liver Failure and Their Management

Cirrhosis is an end-stage liver disease that can cause changes in any component of the hemostatic system. The net effects of the complicated hemostatic changes have long been unknown due to concurrent changes in pro-and antihemostatic drivers. Coagulation disorders are caused by various factors, including decreased clotting and inhibitor factor synthesis, reduced clearance of activated factors, quantitative and qualitative platelet defects, hyperfibrinolysis, and increased intravascular coagulation. This review discusses the pathogenesis of coagulopathy and multiple studies related to its clinical presentations. This article also highlights an additional problem in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to this group of patients: the fact that traditional coagulation tests and transfusional strategies may not be reliable for assessing and managing bleeding or thrombotic risks. Hence, multiple management options have been assessed for bleeding and thrombosis in liver disease.

Covid-19 and Liver Injury: Role of Inflammatory Endotheliopathy, Platelet Dysfunction, and Thrombosis

Liver injury, characterized predominantly by elevated aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, is a common feature of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Additionally, SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with acute-on-chronic liver failure in patients with cirrhosis and has a notably elevated mortality in patients with alcohol-related liver disease compared to other etiologies. Direct viral infection of the liver with SARS-CoV-2 remains controversial, and alternative pathophysiologic explanations for its hepatic effects are an area of active investigation. In this review, we discuss the effects of SARS-CoV-2 and the inflammatory environment it creates on endothelial cells and platelets more generally and then with a hepatic focus. In doing this, we present vascular inflammation and thrombosis as a potential mechanism of liver injury and liver-related complications in COVID-19.

Hemostasis testing in patients with liver dysfunction: Advantages and caveats

Due to concomitant changes in pro- and anti-coagulant mechanisms, patients with liver dysfunction have a “rebalanced hemostasis”, which can easily be tipped toward either a hypo- or a hypercoagulable phenotype. Clinicians are often faced with the question whether patients with chronic liver disease undergoing invasive procedures or surgery and those having active bleeding require correction of the hemostasis abnormalities. Conventional coagulation screening tests, such as the prothrombin time/international normalized ratio and the activated partial thromboplastin time have been demonstrated to have numerous limitations in these patients and do not predict the risk of bleeding prior to high-risk procedures. The introduction of global coagulation assays, such as viscoelastic testing (VET), has been an important step forward in the assessment of the overall hemostasis profile. A growing body of evidence now suggests that the use of VET might be of significant clinical utility to prevent unnecessary infusion of blood products and to improve outcomes in numerous settings. The present review discusses the advantages and caveats of both conventional and global coagulation assays to assess the risk of bleeding in patients with chronic liver disease as well as the current role of transfusion and hemostatic agents to prevent or manage bleeding.

Resistance to thrombomodulin correlates with liver stiffness in chronic liver disease a prospective single-center cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is characterized by changes in haemostasis, embracing both hypo- and hypercoagulability. Global hemostatic tests such as thrombin generation assays evaluate the hemostatic balance, to better assess bleeding and thrombotic risks. In addition, procoagulant state in patients with CLD has been demonstrated using modified thrombin generation assays with thrombomodulin, a cofactor for protein C activation. In this study, we prospectively determined thrombin generation and thrombomodulin resistance in patients with CLD staged with liver stiffness measurement (LSM), using both the fully automated analyzer ST Genesia® Thrombin Generation System (STG) and the calibrated automated thrombogram assay (CAT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics, and blood samples were collected from 65 patients with CLD. Liver stiffness was measured by transient elastography, and thrombin generation and thrombomodulin resistance, by STG and CAT.

RESULTS

Patients were separated based on LSM of <21 and ≥21 kilopascals (kPa). The propagation rate of thrombin generation was higher in patients with LSM ≥21 kPa and the thrombin generation rate increased as LSM increased. In addition, thrombomodulin resistance assessed by STG and CAT was higher in patients with LSM ≥21 kPa. However, ETP inhibition by activated protein C was comparable in patients with LSM <21 and ≥21 kPa. Finally, LSM correlated with most thrombin generation parameters.

CONCLUSION

The STG automated system may have value in the assessment of patients with chronic liver disease in the routine coagulation laboratory. LSM ≥21 kPa identify a procoagulant phenotype in these patients, including thrombomodulin resistance.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy in cirrhotic patient: Issues on the table

Patients with liver cirrhosis are fragile and present specific clinical hallmarks. When undergoing to gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, these subjects require an individual pre evaluation, taking into account: Level of haemostasis impairment, the individual risk of infection, the impact of sedation on hepatic encephalopathy and other factors. The overall assessment of liver function, employing common scoring systems, should be also assessed in the preprocedural phase. Beside some common general problems, regarding GI endoscopy in cirrhotic subjects, also specific issues are present for some frequent indications or procedures. For instance, despite an increased incidence of adenomas in cirrhosis, colon cancer screening remains suboptimal in subjects with this disease. Several studies in fact demonstrated liver cirrhosis as a negative factor for an adequate colon cleansing before colonoscopy. On the other hand, also the routine assessment of gastroesophageal varices during upper GI endoscopy presents some concern, since important inter-observer variability or incomplete description of endoscopic findings has been reported in some studies. In this review we discussed in details the most relevant issues that may be considered while performing general GI endoscopic practice, in patient with cirrhosis. For most of these issues there are no guidelines or clear indications. Moreover until now, few studies focused on these aspects. We believe that targeting these issues with corrective measures may be helpful to develop a tailored endoscopic approach for cirrhosis, in the future.

The hemostatic and thrombotic complications of liver disease

Hepatic cirrhosis leads to numerous hematologic derangements resulting in a complex and tenuously rebalanced hemostatic milieu. The utility of common hematologic tests including the INR and aPTT in assessing hemostatic and thrombotic risk in patients with cirrhosis is limited, and consensus on transfusion thresholds and proper management of thrombotic complications continues to evolve. This review summarizes the pathophysiology of key derangements of hemostasis including those of platelets, von Willebrand factor, pro- and anticoagulation factors, and fibrin. Additionally, the pathogenesis, consequences, optimal management, and prevention of major thrombotic and bleeding complications in cirrhosis arte discussed.

Treatment of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis

Although patients with cirrhosis are known to be in a state of “rebalance” in that pro- and anticoagulant factors increase the risk for both bleeding and thrombosis, the prevalence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with cirrhosis can be up to 26%. Therefore, physicians should consider anticoagulation for the prevention and management of PVT in patients with cirrhosis who are at high risk of PVT. Vitamin K antagonist or low molecular weight heparin is suggested as the standard treatment for PVT in cirrhosis. With the advent of new direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), there is a paradigm shift of switching to DOACs for the treatment of PVT in patients with cirrhosis. However, the safety and efficacy of DOACs in the treatment of PVT was not well-known in patients with cirrhosis. Therefore, this review focused on the current knowledge about the efficacy, safety concerns, and hepatic metabolism of DOACs in patients with cirrhosis and PVT.

The coagulopathy of liver disease: a shift in thinking

The coagulopathy of chronic liver disease causes derangement of the results of traditional laboratory tests. As such, there is an expectation that when undergoing invasive procedures patients with cirrhosis are at increased risk of bleeding. Standard practice is to optimise laboratory values with prophylactic transfusions of platelets, plasma and fibrinogen to reduce perceived bleeding risk. There has been a shift in thinking regarding coagulation in patients with chronic liver disease, whereby a rebalancing of haemostasis occurs with reduction in both procoagulants and anticoagulants. Guidelines for the preprocedural management of patients with chronic liver disease are inconsistent and may not account for this new paradigm. The risk of prophylactic transfusion should be measured against the risk of bleeding while considering the rebalancing of haemostasis. Future management may be guided by whole blood viscoelastic tests or use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists to optimise patients in these scenarios.

Procedure-related bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis and severe thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Gaps of knowledge still exist about the potential association between severe thrombocytopenia and increased risk of procedure-associated bleeding in patients with liver disease.

METHODS

In this narrative review, we aimed at examining the association between procedure-related bleeding risk and platelet count in patients with cirrhosis and severe thrombocytopenia in various settings. We updated to 2020 a previously conducted literature search using MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE. The search string included clinical studies, adult patients with chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia undergoing invasive procedures, any interventions and comparators, and haemorrhagic events of any severity as outcome.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 1276 unique publications, and 15 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed together with those identified by the previous search. Most of the new studies included in our analysis did not assess the association between post-procedural bleeding risk and platelet count alone in patients with chronic liver disease. Furthermore, some results could have been biased by prophylactic platelet transfusions. A few studies found that severe thrombocytopenia may be predictive of bleeding following percutaneous liver biopsy, dental extractions, percutaneous ablation of liver tumours and endoscopic polypectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available literature cannot support definitive conclusions about the appropriate target platelet counts to improve the risk of bleeding in cirrhotic patients who underwent invasive procedures; moreover, it showed enormous variability in the use of prophylactic platelet transfusions.

Influence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Platelet Aggregation in Cirrhosis

Simple Summary

Platelets are blood cells, the main function of which is to form clots and prevent/stop bleeding. However, it has been shown that platelets may be involved in additional pathophysiological processes, including stimulation of cancer growth and metastasis. In fact, inhibition of platelets in patients with various types of cancer has resulted in lower risks of cancer progression and death. This possibility has not yet been considered in patients with cirrhosis (chronic liver disease) and hepatocellular carcinoma (the most common type of liver cancer) because their platelet function has never been investigated. In this study, we show that hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis is associated with significantly altered (increased) platelet function. This paves the way for further studies to evaluate whether the inhibition of these hyper-functional platelets could be beneficial in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Abstract

Hyper-functional platelets are being proposed as a potential therapeutic target in multiple cancers. Whether this can be considered in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unknown as their platelet function has not yet been investigated. We evaluated platelet function in cirrhosis patients with HCC. Patients with cirrhosis with and without HCC were prospectively recruited. Platelet aggregation, a marker of platelet function, was assessed by impedance aggregometry with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid (ASPI), and thrombin (TRAP) stimulation. Plasmatic levels of Von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF) were also determined. One-hundred patients were recruited (50 cirrhotics with and 50 without HCC). Cirrhosis severity by Child class and platelet count were comparable between cirrhotics with and without HCC. Cirrhotics with HCC had higher ADP- (45 vs. 28; p < 0.001), ASPI- (47 vs. 28; p < 0.001), and TRAP- (85 vs. 75; p = 0.01) induced platelet aggregation than cirrhotics without HCC, all indicative of platelet hyper-function. The relatively increased platelet aggregation in patients with HCC was confirmed after adjusting the analysis for platelet count/severity of thrombocytopenia. Levels of VWF were higher in patients with vs. without HCC (348 vs. 267; p = 0.006), particularly in compensated cirrhosis. In patients with cirrhosis, HCC is associated with increased platelet aggregation and higher VWF. The clinical implications of these findings deserve further investigation.

Anticoagulation in patients with advanced liver disease: an open issue

Liver disease has been long considered as a risk factor for bleeding for the presence of prolongation of global tests of clotting activation and low platelet count. For this reason, the use of anticoagulants in patients with liver disease and an indication to anticoagulation, such as atrial fibrillation of venous thrombosis, has been poorly considered. Furthermore, recent studies underscored the fact that patients with chronic liver disease may experience thrombosis in portal as well as systemic circulation and treatment with anticoagulants should be considered. The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants has increased therapeutic options for thromboprophylaxis; however, evidence on their safety and efficacy in specific populations, such as patients with liver disease, is still scarce and needs further investigation. Thus, atrial fibrillation patients with coexistent liver disease have been excluded from clinical trials with direct oral anticoagulants. Here, we provide an overview on mechanisms of thrombosis in patients with advanced chronic liver disease and a summary of evidence on the use of oral anticoagulants in patients with liver disease and portal vein thrombosis or atrial fibrillation.

Translational insight into prothrombotic state and hypercoagulation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an emerging and threatening pathological condition, ranging from fatty liver (FL) to chronic steatohepatitis (NASH), liver cirrhosis, and eventually to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent findings suggest that patients with NAFLD have a higher risk of cardiovascular events and thromboembolism and that this risk is independent of metabolic diseases that are frequently associated with NAFLD, such as diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, and obesity. The vascular involvement of NAFLD might be considered its systemic burden, conditioning higher mortality in patients affected by the disease. These clinical findings suggested the existence of a prothrombotic state in NAFLD, which is partially unexplored and whose underlying mechanisms are to date not completely understood. Here, we review the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of the prothrombotic state in NAFLD across the progression from the healthy liver through the different stages of the disease. We focused on the possible role of several metabolic features of NAFLD possibly leading to hypercoagulation other than endothelial and platelet activation, such as insulin-resistance, nitric oxide production regulation, and gut microbiota homeostasis. Also, we analysed the involvement of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and thromboinflammation taking place in NAFLD. Finally, we described factors striking a prothrombotic imbalance in NASH cirrhosis, with a particular focus on the pathogenesis of portal vein thrombosis.

Platelet-derived microparticles enhance megakaryocyte differentiation and platelet generation via miR-1915-3p

Thrombosis leads to platelet activation and subsequent degradation; therefore, replenishment of platelets from hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) is needed to maintain the physiological level of circulating platelets. Platelet-derived microparticles (PMPs) are protein- and RNA-containing vesicles released from activated platelets. We hypothesized that factors carried by PMPs might influence the production of platelets from HSPCs, in a positive feedback fashion. Here we show that, during mouse acute liver injury, the density of megakaryocyte in the bone marrow increases following an increase in circulating PMPs, but without thrombopoietin (TPO) upregulation. In vitro, PMPs are internalized by HSPCs and drive them toward a megakaryocytic fate. Mechanistically, miR-1915-3p, a miRNA highly enriched in PMPs, is transported to target cells and suppresses the expression levels of Rho GTPase family member B, thereby inducing megakaryopoiesis. In addition, direct injection of PMPs into irradiated mice increases the number of megakaryocytes and platelets without affecting TPO levels. In conclusion, our data reveal that PMPs have a role in promoting megakaryocytic differentiation and platelet production.

Platelets derive from megakaryocytes, which differentiate from hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). Here, Qu et al show that platelet-derived microparticles carrying miR-1915-3p target HSPCs and promote megakaryopoiesis by suppressing RHOB expression levels.

Acute Kidney Injury in Decompensated Cirrhosis Is Associated With Both Hypo-coagulable and Hyper-coagulable Features

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recent evidence suggests that acute kidney injury (AKI) is the main predictor of postparacentesis bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. To assess the factors responsible for bleeding tendency in AKI, we performed a prospective study comparing all three aspects of hemostasis (platelets, coagulation, and fibrinolysis) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis with and without AKI.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Primary hemostasis assessment included platelet aggregation and secretion (platelet function markers) and von Willebrand factor. Secondary hemostasis assessment included pro-coagulant (factor VIII and factor XIII) and anti-coagulant (protein C, protein S, and antithrombin) factors and thrombin generation. Tertiary hemostasis assessment included fibrinolytic factors and plasmin-antiplasmin complex. Eighty patients with decompensated cirrhosis were recruited (40 each with and without AKI). Severity of cirrhosis and platelet count were comparable between groups. Median serum creatinine was 1.8 mg/dL and 0.8 mg/dL in patients with and without AKI, respectively. At baseline, patients with cirrhosis and AKI had lower platelet aggregation and secretion, indicative of impaired platelet function (increased bleeding tendency), without differences in von Willebrand factor. Regarding coagulation factors, factor VIII was higher, whereas protein C, protein S, and antithrombin were all lower, which, together with increased thrombin generation, indicate hypercoagulability. In contrast, factor XIII was lower in AKI (increased bleeding tendency). Finally, while both hypofibrinolytic and hyperfibrinolytic changes were present in AKI, a higher plasmin-antiplasmin complex indicated a hyperfibrinolytic state. After AKI resolution (n = 23 of 40), platelet function and coagulation improved to levels observed in patients with cirrhosis patients without AKI; however, fibrinolysis remained hyperactivated.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, AKI is associated with both hypocoagulable and hypercoagulable features that can potentially increase the risk of both bleeding and thrombosis.

Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology

Liver biopsy is required when clinically important information about the diagnosis, prognosis or management of a patient cannot be obtained by safer means, or for research purposes. There are several approaches to liver biopsy but predominantly percutaneous or transvenous approaches are used. A wide choice of needles is available and the approach and type of needle used will depend on the clinical state of the patient and local expertise but, for non-lesional biopsies, a 16-gauge needle is recommended. Many patients with liver disease will have abnormal laboratory coagulation tests or receive anticoagulation or antiplatelet medication. A greater understanding of the changes in haemostasis in liver disease allows for a more rational, evidence-based approach to peri-biopsy management. Overall, liver biopsy is safe but there is a small morbidity and a very small mortality so patients must be fully counselled. The specimen must be of sufficient size for histopathological interpretation. Communication with the histopathologist, with access to relevant clinical information and the results of other investigations, is essential for the generation of a clinically useful report.

Assessment of hemostatic profile in patients with mild to advanced liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Hemostasis of patients suffering from liver cirrhosis is challenging due to both, pro- and anticoagulatory disorders leading to hemostatic alterations with distinct abnormalities of coagulation. Pathological changes in conventional coagulation analysis and platelet count are common manifestations of decreased liver synthesis of coagulation factors and reduced platelet count in these patients. However, conventional coagulation analysis and platelet count do not reflect in-vivo coagulation status or platelet function. The purpose of this present observational study was therefore to assess the haemostatic profile including plasmatic coagulation using thrombelastometry and impedance aggregometry for platelet function in patients suffering from liver cirrhosis.

AIM

To assess the hemostatic profile of cirrhotic patients according to model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score.

METHODS

Our study included both in- and outpatients suffering from liver cirrhosis attending the out- and inpatient care of the department of hepatology. Demographic and biochemical data as well as medical history including cause of liver cirrhosis, end stage kidney failure and medication with anticoagulants were recorded. To assess the hemostatic profile, platelet function was analyzed by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) using Multiplate^® (ADP-, ASPI- and TRAP-test) and thrombelastometry using ROTEM^® (EXTEM, INTEM, FIBTEM). Data were compared using Mann-Whitney U- or χ²-test. Spearman correlation was performed to analyze the association between MELD Score and results of thrombelastometry and MEA.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients attending the out- and inpatient care suffering from liver cirrhosis were screened. Of these, 50 patients were included and assigned to groups according to MELD score 6 to 11 (n = 25) or ≥ 17 (n = 25). Baseline patient characteristics revealed significant differences for MELD score (8 vs 22, P < 0.0001) and underlying laboratory parameters (international normalized ratio, bilirubine, creatinine) as well as fibrinogen level (275 mg/dL vs 209 mg/dL, P = 0.006) and aPTT (30 s vs 35 s, P = 0.047). MEA showed a moderately impaired platelet function (medians: AUC_ADP = 43U, AUC_ASPI = 71U, AUC_TRAP = 92U) but no significant differences between both groups. Thrombelastometry using ROTEM^® (EXTEM, INTEM, FIBTEM) revealed values within normal range in both groups. No significant correlation was observed between MELD score and results of MEA/thrombelastometry.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate a partially impaired hemostatic profile in liver cirrhosis patients unrelated to MELD score. An individual assessment of a potential coagulopathy should therefore be considered.

Primary Hemostasis in Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis: What Did We Learn over the Past Decade?

Changes in primary hemostasis have been described in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and cirrhosis and are still subject to ongoing debate. Thrombocytopenia is common and multifactorial. Numerous studies also reported platelet dysfunction. In spite of these changes, primary hemostasis seems to be balanced. Patients with CLD and cirrhosis can suffer from both hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Variceal bleeding is the major hemorrhagic complication and is mainly determined by high portal pressure. Non portal hypertension-related bleeding due to hemostatic failure is uncommon. Thrombocytopenia can complicate management of invasive procedures in CLD patients. Recently, oral thrombopoietin agonists have been approved to raise platelets before invasive procedures. In this review we aim to bundle literature, published over the past decade, discussing primary hemostasis in CLD and cirrhosis including (1) platelet count and the role of thrombopoietin (TPO) agonists, (2) platelet function tests and markers of platelet activation, (3) von Willebrand factor and (4) global hemostasis tests.

Impact of liver disease on oral anticoagulant prescription and major adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation: analysis from a population-based cohort study

AIMS 

Data on the impact of liver disease (LD) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and the role of oral anticoagulant (OAC) drugs for stroke prevention are limited.

METHODS AND RESULTS 

A retrospective observational population-based cohort study on the administrative health databases of Lombardy region Italy. All AF patients ≥40 years admitted to hospital from 2000 to 2018 were considered. Atrial fibrillation and LD diagnosis were established using ICD9-CM codes. Use of OAC was determined with Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes. Primary study outcomes were stroke, major bleeding, and all-cause death. Among 393 507 AF patients, 16 168 (4.1%) had concomitant LD. Liver disease AF patients were significantly less treated with OAC. Concomitant LD was associated with an increased risk in all the study outcomes [hazard ratio (HR): 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.25 for stroke; HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.47-1.66 for major bleeding; HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.39-1.44 for all-cause death]. Use of OAC in patients with AF and LD resulted in a reduction in stroke (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.92), major bleeding (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74-0.99), and all-cause death (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.73-0.80), with similar results according to subgroups. A net clinical benefit (NCB) analysis suggested a positive benefit/risk ratio in using OAC in AF patients with LD (NCB: 0.408, 95% CI: 0.375-0.472).

CONCLUSION

In AF patients, concomitant LD carries a significantly higher risk for all clinical outcomes. Use of OAC in AF patients with LD was associated with a significant favourable benefit/risk ratio, even in high-risk patient subgroups.

Assessment and management of coagulopathy in critically-ill patients with liver failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides insight into our current understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of coagulopathy associated with liver failure, and bleeding risk assessment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) have a rebalanced coagulation profile and are at risk for both excessive clotting and bleeding. Hypercoagulability is associated with profound endothelial dysfunction and an increased concentration of liver-independent coagulation factors. Because of this rebalanced coagulation profile, standard laboratory tests have been demonstrated to be ineffective in either predicting and/or guiding the management of coagulopathy. Viscoelastic testing, however, is able to provide a dynamic assessment of clot formation in whole blood and has been demonstrated to be invaluable in both monitoring and management of coagulation problems associated with liver failure. More recently, there is increasing interest in thrombin generation tests to monitor coagulation in patients with ESLD.Multiple institutional protocols for prophylaxis and treatment of ESLD-related thromboses have been developed. High-quality studies evaluating these approaches are lacking.

SUMMARY

Patients with ESLD are at risk for excessive bleeding and clotting. Treatment of any significant coagulopathy should not be based solely on standard laboratory tests. Thrombosis prophylaxis has to be considered in susceptible populations.

Management of Hepatic Coagulopathy in Bleeding and Nonbleeding Patients: An Evidence-Based Review

Patients with varying degrees of hepatic dysfunction often present with presumed bleeding diathesis based on interpretation of routine measures of coagulation (prothrombin time [PT], international normalized ratio [INR], and activated partial thromboplastin time). However, standard markers of coagulation do not reflect the actual bleeding risk in this population and may lead to inappropriate administration of hemostatic agents and blood products. The concept of "rebalanced hemostasis" explains both the risk of bleeding and clotting seen in patients with liver dysfunction. The role of pharmacologic agents and blood products for prevention of bleeding during high-risk procedures and treatment of clinically significant bleeding remains unclear. Viscoelastic measurements of the clotting cascade provide information about platelets, fibrinogen/fibrin polymerization, coagulation factors, and fibrinolysis that might better represent hemostasis in vivo and may better inform management strategies. Due to the paucity of available data, firm recommendations for the use of blood products and pharmacologic agents in patients with hepatic coagulopathies are lacking, and thus, these products should not be routinely administered. Traditional laboratory tests such as PT/INR should not be the sole determinant of potential interventions. Rather, clinicians should assess factors such as the severity of bleed or bleeding risk of the procedure, the patient's risk of thromboembolism, and the strength of available evidence for specific agents and blood products to guide decision-making.

Liver Transplantation

The field of liver transplantation has changed since the MELD scoring system became the most widely used donor allocation tool. Due to the MELD-based allocation system, sicker patients with higher MELD scores are being transplanted. Persistent organ donor shortages remain a challenging issue, and as a result, the wait-list mortality is a persistent problem for most of the regions. This chapter focuses on deceased donor and live donor liver transplantation in patients with complications of portal hypertension. Special attention will also be placed on donor-recipient matching, perioperative management of transplant patients, and the impact of hepatic hemodynamics on transplantation.

Acquired platelet function disorders

The possibility of an acquired platelet function disorder should be considered in patients who present with recent onset muco-cutaneous bleeding. Despite the availability of newer and faster platelet function assays, light transmission aggregometry (LTA) remains the preferred diagnostic test. This review examines and discusses the causes of acquired platelet dysfunction; most commonly drugs, dietary factors, medical disorders and procedures. In addition to well-known antiplatelet therapies, clinicians should be alert for newer drugs which can affect platelets, such as ibrutinib. There is little clinical trial evidence to guide the management of acquired platelet function defects, but we summarise commonly employed strategies, which include addressing the underlying cause, antifibrinolytic agents, desmopressin infusions, and in selected patients, platelet transfusions.

Novel insights into the assessment of risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in decompensated cirrhotic children

OBJECTIVES

Cirrhotic children wait-listed for liver transplant are prone to bleeding from gastrointestinal varices. Grade 2-3 esophageal varices, red signs, and gastric varices are well-known risk factors. However, the involvement of hemostatic factors remains controversial because of the rebalanced state of coagulation during cirrhosis.

METHODS

Children suffering from decompensated cirrhosis were prospectively included while being on waitlist. Portal hypertension was assessed by ultrasound and endoscopy. Coagulopathy was evaluated through conventional tests, thromboelastometry, and platelet function testing. The included children were followed up until liver transplantation, and all bleeding episodes were recorded. Children with or without bleeding were compared according to clinical, radiological, endoscopic, and biological parameters. In addition, validation of a predictive model for risk of variceal bleeding comprising of grade 2-3 esophageal varices, red spots, and fibrinogen level <150 mg/dL was applied on this cohort.

RESULTS

Of 20 enrolled children, 6 had upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Significant differences were observed in fibrinogen level, adenosine diphosphate, and thrombin-dependent platelet aggregation. The model used to compute the upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk had an estimated predictive performance of 81.0%. Platelet aggregation analysis addition improved the estimated predictive performance up to 89.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated an association between hemostatic factors and the upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk. A low fibrinogen level and platelet aggregation dysfunction may predict the risk of bleeding in children with decompensated cirrhosis. A predictive model is available to assess the upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk but needs further investigations. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT03244332.

The optimal use of blood components in the management of gastrointestinal bleeding

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding accounts for 5,000 deaths per annum in the UK and is the second-most common indication for transfusion of blood components. Transfusion of blood components is integral to management of these patients. Recent years have seen an expansion in the evidence base for their use in this population and this review aims to provide up-to-date guidance on the use of red cells, plasma, platelets, sources of concentrated fibrinogen and adjuncts such as antifibrinolytic agents in patients with acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Key considerations include whether or not it is appropriate to extrapolate from studies in trauma patients to the GI bleeding population, whether restrictive red cell transfusion is appropriate for all patients and whether the presence or absence of liver disease has implications for our transfusion practice. Clinical evidence now favours restrictive transfusion of red blood cells in the haemodynamically stable bleeding patient, but there remain significant evidence gaps concerning the use of plasma, platelets and adjunctive measures.

Management of haemostatic alterations and associated disorders in cirrhosis in Spain: A national survey

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of haematological abnormalities in cirrhosis has greatly improved in recent years.

AIMS

To evaluate how Spanish Digestive Disease specialists manage haemostatic alterations and associated disorders in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

All members of the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver and Spanish Society of Digestive Pathology were invited to fill in a web-based questionnaire.

RESULTS

135 professionals, 93 hepatologists and 42 non-hepatologists responded to the survey. The concept of rebalanced haemostasis was known by 74.8% of them. Most specialists corrected the INR and thrombocytopenia before invasive procedures with moderate risk of bleeding or major surgery and in severe gastrointestinal bleeding. The threshold of platelets and, especially, INR used to administer blood products varied greatly. Pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism prevailed, but it was highly dependent on the INR and platelet figures. Most participants initiated anticoagulation regardless of the degree of portal vein thrombosis, even in patients ineligible for transplantation. In potential candidates, only 56% maintained it indefinitely or until liver transplantation. No major differences between hepatologists and non-hepatologists were found.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant variability and certain deviation from current guidelines was observed among Spanish Digestive Disease specialists regarding management of haemostatic alterations and associated disorders in cirrhosis.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists and risk of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver disease and thrombocytopenia: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of thrombocytopenia with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPORAs) seems to be associated with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). We performed a meta-analysis of the trials carried out in this clinical setting to assess if such association is detectable.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis with studies that compared the effect of TPORAS vs placebo in patients with CLD and thrombocytopenia.

RESULTS

Four studies, including 1953 patients, reported the incidence of PVT in patients with CLD and thrombocytopenia treated with TPORAs or placebo. No significant difference was found for incidence of PVT in patients treated with TPORAs compared with placebo (O.R.: 2.8; 95% C.I., 0.97-8.16; p = 0.055). A significant association between PVT and TPORAs was observed only in patients treated with eltrombopag (O.R.: 3.8; 95% C.I., 1.14-13.2; p = 0.03). Three studies, including 514 patients who were undergoing an elective invasive procedure, analyzed the incidence of PVT in TPORAs-treated patients with CLD and thrombocytopenia; no significant difference was found for incidence of PVT in patients treated with TPORAs compared with placebo (O.R.: 2.6; 95% C.I., 0.6-11.6; p = 0.212). A significant difference was found for incidence of arterial and venous thrombo-embolic events in CLD patients treated with eltrombopag compared with placebo-treated patients (O.R.: 3.4; 95% C.I., 1.5-7.7; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis show that TPORAs are not associated with PVT in CLD patients even in the case of surgical procedure. PVT risk seems to be associated only with eltrombopag use.