Studies on the epidemiology of hepatitis B and C virus infections are still needed

Establishment of an anti-hepatitis C virus IgG avidity test for dried serum/plasma spots

Monitoring recency of infection helps to identify current transmission in vulnerable populations for effective disease control. We have established an in-house avidity based hepatitis C virus (HCV) recency assay based on the Monolisa Anti-HCV PLUS Version 3 ELISA kit for use of dried serum/plasma spots (DS/PS) in order to distinguish recent and long-term infections. A first panel of DS/PS (n = 218; genotype 1 n = 170 and non-genotype 1 n = 48) consisting of primary and at least one follow up sample was used to analyze the temporal changes of the Avidity Index (AI) over time. Sub-panels of longitudinal DS/PS (n = 66) and acute cases (<26 weeks; n = 34) were taken to calculate the Mean Duration of Recent Infection (MDRI) and the False Long-term Rate (FLTR), respectively. A second panel of DS/PS >104 weeks (n = 132) and a third panel of DS/PS prepared from resolved infections (≥180 days since last positive; n = 32) were used to calculate the False Recent Rate (FRR). For all genotypes, the optimal AI cut-off was determined to be 40% resulting in an MDRI of 364 days (95% CI: 223-485). FLTR was 5.9% (95% CI: 0.7-19.7), 8.3% (95% CI: 1-27), and 0% (-) and FRR was 13.6% (95% CI: 8.3-20.7), 11.7% (95% CI: 6.6-19), and 30.6% (95% CI: 9.1-61.4) for all genotypes, genotype 1, and non-genotype 1 infections, respectively. For resolved infections, the FRR was 53.1% (95% CI: 35.8-70.4). Thus, this assay performs particularly well for genotype 1 reaching a high rate of correct discriminations between infections acquired less than a year before diagnosis and those acquired earlier by applying an AI cut-off of 40%. Due to a rapid decline in avidity post resolution of an HCV infection this assay is not recommended to be used in HCV RNA negative patients.

Progress toward implementing the Swiss Hepatitis Strategy: Is HCV elimination possible by 2030?

Catalyzed by the concerns over the growing public health and economic burden of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) in Switzerland, a diverse group of experts and patient representatives came together in 2014 to develop the Swiss Hepatitis Strategy, setting targets for the elimination of viral hepatitis in Switzerland by 2030. Previous studies have reported the estimated number of chronic HCV infections and forecasted burden of disease given different intervention strategies. However, given new prevalence data by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, which decreased total infections by about half, an updated analysis is warranted. We aimed to provide an updated viremic prevalence estimate for Switzerland and evaluate the impact on forecasted liver related morbidity and mortality of an ‘inaction’ scenario and intervention scenarios to achieve the Global Health Sector Strategy for Viral Hepatitis and Swiss Hepatitis Strategy goals by 2030. A Markov disease-progression model was used to calculate the present and future burden of HCV infection by disease stage according to these different strategies. In 2017, there were an estimated 36,800 (95% UI: 26,900–39,200) viremic infections in Switzerland. Given the current standard of care, total viremic infections are expected to decline by 45%, while cases of decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related deaths will decrease by 20%. If treatment and diagnosis efforts were to cease in 2018, late stage HCV-related morbidity and mortality would increase by 90–100% by 2030. Increasing treatment and diagnosis to achieve the Global Health Sector Strategy or Swiss Hepatitis Strategy goals by 2030, will reduce the number of chronic infections to less than 13,000 and 4,000, respectively. Although the HCV epidemic is declining in Switzerland, efforts to expand diagnosis and treatment are needed to achieve elimination by 2030.

Characteristics of patients with hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus dual infection in a Western European country: Comparison with monoinfected patients

The epidemiology of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections is continuously evolving. Updated data on dual HBV and HCV infection are still needed.

AIMS

To assess the main characteristics of patients with HBV and HCV dual infection, to compare these with those of patients infected with either HBV or HCV and, among patients with dual infection, to assess fibrosis according to HCV replication.

METHODS

Data of 23 patients with dual infection were compared to data from 92 age and sex-matched HBV or HCV monoinfected patients.

RESULTS

Patients with dual infection were more often immigrants from Africa or Asia than HCV or HBV patients (52% vs. 20% and 22%, respectively, P=0.01). Intravenous drug use was the route of transmission in 22% of patients with dual infection, which was less frequent than in HCV patients (41%) but more frequent than in HBV patients (0%). Extensive fibrosis or cirrhosis was as frequent among dual-infected patients as among those with HCV or chronic hepatitis B infection (19% vs. 29% vs. 14%, respectively, P=0.4), even when fibrosis stage was reported considering the duration of infection. In dual-infected patients, the prevalence of extensive fibrosis or cirrhosis was similar in patients with and without detectable HCV RNA (18% vs. 20%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HBV and HCV dual infection were more often immigrants from Africa or Asia and had similar fibrosis stages than HCV or HBV monoinfected patients. In patients with dual infection, extensive fibrosis or cirrhosis was not associated with HCV replication.

Exploring Hepatitis From the Perspective of Iranian Traditional Medicine: Using a Qualitative Approach

Hepatitis is a global health problem, with significant adverse impacts on patients' quality of life. In this study, we aimed to review major resources of Iranian traditional medicine and determine whether the etiology and semiology of hepatitis, in particular chronic hepatitis, in traditional and conventional medicine might be aligned. Through such studies, we might be able to develop new approaches for clinical research to improve our current knowledge on the etiology and treatment of this condition. In this qualitative study, recently published studies, scientific databases, and reliable Iranian traditional medicine resources, including the Canon of Medicine, were searched. The integrative use of conventional and traditional medicine for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes could be evaluated to develop new modalities for dealing with this condition. An integrated approach is recommended in clinical research in order to find more efficient and safer treatment.

Alcohol intake increases the risk of HCC in hepatitis C virus-related compensated cirrhosis: A prospective study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Whether alcohol intake increases the risk of complications in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of alcohol intake and viral eradication on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), decompensation of cirrhosis and death.

METHODS

Data on alcohol intake and viral eradication were prospectively collected in 192 patients with compensated HCV-related cirrhosis.

RESULTS

74 patients consumed alcohol (median alcohol intake: 15g/day); 68 reached viral eradication. During a median follow-up of 58months, 33 patients developed HCC, 53 experienced at least one decompensation event, and 39 died. The 5-year cumulative incidence rate of HCC was 10.6% (95% CI: 4.6-16.6) in abstainers vs. 23.8% (95% CI: 13.5-34.1) in consumers (p=0.087), and 2.0% (95% CI: 0-5.8) vs. 21.7% (95% CI: 14.2-29.2) in patients with and without viral eradication (p=0.002), respectively. The lowest risk of HCC was observed for patients without alcohol intake and with viral eradication (0%) followed by patients with alcohol intake and viral eradication (6.2% [95% CI: 0-18.4]), patients without alcohol intake and no viral eradication (15.9% [95% CI: 7.1-24.7]), and patients with alcohol intake and no viral eradication (29.2% [95% CI: 16.5-41.9]) (p=0.009). In multivariate analysis, lack of viral eradication and alcohol consumption were associated with the risk of HCC (hazard ratio for alcohol consumption: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.49-7.92, p=0.004). Alcohol intake did not influence the risk of decompensation or death.

CONCLUSIONS

Light-to-moderate alcohol intake increases the risk of HCC in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. Patient care should include measures to ensure abstinence.

LAY SUMMARY

Whether alcohol intake increases the risk of complications in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis remains unclear. In this prospective study, light-to-moderate alcohol intake was associated with the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in multivariate analysis. No patients who did not use alcohol and who reached viral eradication developed hepatocellular carcinoma during follow-up. The risk of hepatocellular carcinoma increased with alcohol intake or in patients without viral eradication and was highest when alcohol intake was present in the absence of viral eradication. Patients with HCV-related cirrhosis should be strongly advised against any alcohol intake. Patient care should include measures to ensure abstinence.

Use of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Immunoglobulin G Antibody Avidity as a Biomarker to Estimate the Population-Level Incidence of HCV Infection

BACKGROUND

Sensitive methods are needed to estimate the population-level incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

METHODS

We developed an HCV immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody avidity assay by modifying the Ortho 3.0 HCV enzyme-linked immunoassay and tested 997 serum or plasma samples from 568 people who inject drugs enrolled in prospective cohort studies. Avidity-based testing algorithms were evaluated by their (1) mean duration of recent infection (MDRI), defined as the average time an individual is identified as having been recently infected, according to a given algorithm; (2) false-recent rate, defined as the proportion of samples collected >2 years after HCV seroconversion that were misclassified as recent; (3) sample sizes needed to estimate incidence; and (4) power to detect a reduction in incidence between serial cross-sectional surveys.

RESULTS

A multiassay algorithm (defined as an avidity index of <30%, followed by HCV viremia detection) had an MDRI of 147 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 125-195 days), and the false-recent rates were 0.7% (95% CI, .2%-1.8%) and 7.6% (95% CI, 4.2%-12.3%) among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative and HIV-positive persons, respectively. In various simulated high-risk populations, this algorithm required <1000 individuals to estimate incidence (relative standard error, 30%) and had >80% power to detect a 50% reduction in incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Avidity-based algorithms have the capacity to accurately estimate HCV infection incidence and rapidly assess the impact of public health efforts among high-risk populations. Efforts to optimize this method should be prioritized.