Effectiveness of ravidasvir plus sofosbuvir in interferon-naïve and treated patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype-4

Safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based medication regimens with and without ribavirin in hepatitis C patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Sofosbuvir (SOF) is a new and highly effective medication that dramatically improved hepatitis C virus (HCV) management. However, ribavirin (RBV) is still added to SOF-based medication regimens in several clinical scenarios, despite its well-known toxicities. The aim of our study is to systematically review and analyse the impact of adding RBV to SOF-based medication regimens on clinical outcomes among HCV patients.

METHODS

Included studies were randomized trials comparing the same SOF-based medication regimens with and without RBV in HCV patients and measuring serious adverse events (SAEs) and/or sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR-12). Two investigators independently searched PubMed and Cochrane Library through September 2021. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess trials quality. Clinical outcomes were analysed as risk ratios (RR) using a random effects model using R version 4.1.2.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Our study included a total of 26 trials with 5058 HCV patients. Quality assessment showed moderate risk of bias for most trials. Upon adding RBV, there was no significant difference in SAEs (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.77-1.48, I2  = 10%), nor an impact on SVR-12 (RR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.98-1.01, I2  = 41%). There was no evidence of publication bias for either outcome. Subgroup analysis consistently showed lack of benefit among HCV subgroups. Additionally, NCT01826981 was identified as the main source of heterogeneity in the SVR-12 outcome.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest nonsignificant differences in safety and efficacy between SOF-based medication regimens with and without RBV which should be considered in clinical practice.

Occult Hepatitis (B) Infection in Hepatitis (C) Virus Infection Patients after the Treatment with Direct Acting Antiviral Drugs

Background: The prevalence of occult hepatitis B ranges widely in patients with hepatitis C. This may have an impact on treatment of hepatitis C. Aims: The current study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of occult hepatitis B infection in chronic hepatitis C patients who finished the course of treatment with direct acting antiviral drugs and it’s correlation with treatment failure. Setting: Outpatient Clinic of Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Egypt. Patients and methods: This study was conducted on 900 Egyptian patients chronically infected with HCV. All patients tested positive for serum real time polymerase chain reaction for HCV- RNA and received DAAs therapy for 12 weeks. Patients were categorized to:  Group I: 450 patients with chronic hepatitis C after direct antiviral treatment who responded to treatment. Group II: 450 patients with chronic hepatitis C after direct antiviral treatment who didn’t respond to treatment. All patients were submitted to clinical examination, laboratory investigations and abdominal ultrasonography. Detection of HBV- DNA and HCV- RNA was performed by PCR. Results: The prevalence of OBI detected in sera of HCV patients was 10.6 % (96/900). The present study showed no significant correlation between prevalence of OBI and virologic failure (p-value: 0.084).  There was no statistically significant difference (p-value > 0.05) between the studied groups as regard prevalence of OBI. Conclusion: The prevalence of OBI was 10.6% in patients chronically infected with HCV. OBI doesn't affect the anti-HCV DAAs outcomes.

Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of ravidasvir, with and without danoprevir/ritonavir, in healthy subjects

Ravidasvir (RDV) is a novel oral hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitor. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of RDV and the drug-drug interaction between RDV and ritonavir-boosted danoprevir (DNVr) in healthy adults. In 1^st study, healthy volunteers were administered oral single doses of 100, 200 and 300 mg RDV and 200 mg once daily for 7 days. The 2^nd study was randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled sequential design (day 1 for 200 mg RDV alone, day 7 for 100 mg/100 mg DNVr, day 13 for 200 mg RDV plus 100mg/100mg DNVr, followed by RDV 200 mg once daily with DNVr 100mg/100mg twice daily for 10 days). The results showed that RDV exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner following a single dose with no evidence of accumulation with multiple doses. Co-administration with DNVr regimen (100 mg/100 mg, twice daily) resulted in a 2.92- and 1.99-fold increase in minimum plasma concentration at steady state (C_min,ss) and area under the concentration-time curve at steady state (AUC_τ) of RDV. With co-administration of RDV, maximum plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the concentration curve from zero to 12 h (AUC_0-12) of DNV increased 1.71-fold and 2.33-fold, respectively. We did not observe any significant changes in ritonavir exposure. Both single and multiple doses of RDV with or without DNVr were well tolerated. The favorable pharmacokinetic and safety results support ravidasvir's continued clinical development and treatment.

Efficacy and safety of ravidasvir plus sofosbuvir in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis (STORM-C-1): interim analysis of a two-stage, open-label, multicentre, single arm, phase 2/3 trial

BACKGROUND

In low-income and middle-income countries, affordable direct-acting antivirals are urgently needed to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The combination of ravidasvir, a pangenotypic non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitor, and sofosbuvir has shown efficacy and safety in patients with chronic HCV genotype 4 infection. STORM-C-1 trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ravidasvir plus sofosbuvir in a diverse population of adults chronically infected with HCV.

METHODS

STORM-C-1 is a two-stage, open-label, phase 2/3 single-arm clinical trial in six public academic and non-academic centres in Malaysia and four public academic and non-academic centres in Thailand. Patients with HCV with compensated cirrhosis (Metavir F4 and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A) or without cirrhosis (Metavir F0-3) aged 18-69 years were eligible to participate, regardless of HCV genotype, HIV infection status, previous interferon-based HCV treatment, or source of HCV infection. Once daily ravidasvir (200 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) were prescribed for 12 weeks for patients without cirrhosis and for 24 weeks for those with cirrhosis. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response at 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12; defined as HCV RNA <12 IU/mL in Thailand and HCV RNA <15 IU/mL in Malaysia at 12 weeks after the end of treatment). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02961426, and the National Medical Research Register of Malaysia, NMRR-16-747-29183.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 14, 2016, and June 5, 2017, 301 patients were enrolled in stage one of STORM-C-1. 98 (33%) patients had genotype 1a infection, 27 (9%) had genotype 1b infection, two (1%) had genotype 2 infection, 158 (52%) had genotype 3 infection, and 16 (5%) had genotype 6 infection. 81 (27%) patients had compensated cirrhosis, 90 (30%) had HIV co-infection, and 99 (33%) had received previous interferon-based treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were pyrexia (35 [12%]), cough (26 [9%]), upper respiratory tract infection (23 [8%]), and headache (20 [7%]). There were no deaths or treatment discontinuations due to serious adverse events related to study drugs. Of the 300 patients included in the full analysis set, 291 (97%; 95% CI 94-99) had SVR12. Of note, SVR12 was reported in 78 (96%) of 81 patients with cirrhosis and 153 (97%) of 158 patients with genotype 3 infection, including 51 (96%) of 53 patients with cirrhosis. There was no difference in SVR12 rates by HIV co-infection or previous interferon treatment.

INTERPRETATION

In this first stage, ravidasvir plus sofosbuvir was effective and well tolerated in this diverse adult population of patients with chronic HCV infection. Ravidasvir plus sofosbuvir has the potential to provide an additional affordable, simple, and efficacious public health tool for large-scale implementation to eliminate HCV as a cause of morbidity and mortality.

FUNDING

National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand; Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand; Ministry of Health, Malaysia; UK Aid; Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF); MSF Transformational Investment Capacity; FIND; Pharmaniaga; Starr International Foundation; Foundation for Art, Research, Partnership and Education; and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.

Determination and structural characterization of ravidasvir metabolites by LC coupled to triple quadrupole linear ion trap MS: Application to pharmacokinetics and phase I metabolism in rats

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an infectious disease that has become a global clinical issue because of its significant morbidity and mortality. Novel anti-hepatitis C drugs are continuously developed to decrease the pervasiveness of the infection globally. A synthetic ravidasvir, benzimidazole-naphthylene-imidazole derivatives, has been used as an anti-HCV drug. This study determined the metabolites of ravidasvir and its pharmacokinetics in rats using information-dependent acquisition and multiple reaction monitoring scanning modes in linear ion trap LC-MS/MS instrument, respectively. Two time-programming linear-gradient chromatographic methods were employed using a Kinetex C₁₈ column (50 × 3 mm, 2.6 μm) and a Luna HILIC column (100 × 4.6 mm, 3 μm) for the qualitative and quantitative determination of ravidasvir and its metabolites, respectively. In silico prediction where sites in a molecule are susceptible to metabolism by cytochrome P₄₅₀ was implemented, which helped in proposing the metabolic pathway of ravidasvir. The most dominant metabolite in rat liver microsomal samples was oxidative ravidasvir, where one O-demethylated metabolite and eight isomers of the oxidative ravidasvir metabolites were identified. The study provides essential data for proposing the metabolic pathway and successfully applied it to determine the pharmacokinetics of ravidasvir in rat plasma.

Antiviral Classification

Over the past 60 years, more than 100 antiviral drugs or their combinations have been approved for clinical use. Antiviral drugs can be classified according to their chemical nature (e.g., small-molecules, peptides, biologics) or mechanisms of drug actions against specific viral proteins (e.g., polymerase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, glycoprotein inhibitors). This article provides an overview of antiviral classifications in 10 important human viruses: hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), variola virus (human smallpox), varicella zoster virus (VZV), influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Validated Microwell-Based Spectrofluorimetric Method for Quantification of Ravidasvir (New Anti-Chronic Hepatitis C Virus-GT4) in Rat Plasma and Its Application to Pharmacokinetic Study

Background

Ravidasvir (RAV) has been regarded as a potent new NS5A inhibitor with a magnificent safety and tolerability in the management of genotype 4 hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients. Suitable analytical techniques are needed for the measurement of RAV in different biological matrices.

Methods

We have developed a fast, sensitive and economical 96-microwell-based spectrofluorimetric technique combined with one-step protein precipitation extraction strategy for the measurement of RAV in rat plasma.

Results

Under the optimum conditions, the direct relationship in rat plasma was accomplished between the RAV concentrations and the fluorescence (FL) intensity in a scope of 2.5–200 ng/mL with 0.9998 and 0.9999 for the quantification and correlation coefficients, respectively. The lower limit of detection (LLOD) was 0.840 ng/mL and this demonstrates the high sensitivity of the proposed assay. The accuracy (RE%) ranged from 95.34% to 102.29%, and the precision (RSD%) was less than 3.59%. The recovery was ranged from 93.12% to 96.26%. The stability of RAV in rat plasma was carried out and established its good stability in the range of room conventional temperature and at long-term stability (−80°C, 30 days). The developed technique was validated as stated by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) guidelines for bioanalytical technique verification.

Conclusion

The approved technique was effectively applied for a pharmacokinetic (PK) study after single oral gavage administration of RAV at a dose of 35 mg/kg and it could be presumed that the proposed assay can be applied to clinical trials.

Treatment optimisation for hepatitis C in the era of combination direct-acting antiviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Prior to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, personalised medicine played an important role in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Whilst simplified treatment strategies are central to treatment scale-up, some patients will benefit from treatment optimisation. This systematic review and meta-analysis explores treatment optimisation strategies in the DAA era. Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science for studies that adopted a stratified or personalised strategy using a licensed combination DAA regimen, alone or with additional agents. We performed a thematic analysis to classify optimisation strategies and a meta-analysis of sustained virologic response rates (SVR), exploring heterogeneity with subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Results: We included 64 studies (9450 participants). Thematic analysis found evidence of three approaches: duration, combination, and/or dose optimisation. We separated strategies into those aiming to maintain SVR in the absence of predictors of failure, and those aiming to improve SVR in the presence of predictors of failure. Shortened duration regimens achieve pooled SVR rates of 94.2% (92.3-95.9%) for 8 weeks, 81.1% (75.1-86.6%) for 6 weeks, and 63.1% (39.9-83.7%) for ≤4 weeks. Personalised strategies (100% vs 87.6%; p<0.001) and therapy shortened according to ≥3 host/viral factors (92.9% vs 81.4% or 87.2% for 1 or 2 host/viral factors, respectively; p=0.008) offer higher SVR rates when shortening therapy. Hard-to-treat HCV genotype 3 patients suffer lower SVR rates despite treatment optimisation (92.6% vs 98.2%; p=0.001). Conclusions: Treatment optimisation for individuals with multiple predictors of treatment failure can offer high SVR rates. More evidence is needed to identify with confidence those individuals in whom SVR can be achieved with shortened duration treatment.