1
|
Di Martino M, Nicolazzi M, Baroffio P, Polidoro MA, Colombo Mainini C, Pocorobba A, Bottini E, Donadon M. A critical analysis of surgical outcomes indicators in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: From crude mortality to composite outcomes. World J Surg 2024. [PMID: 39129054 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indicators of surgical outcomes are designed to objectively evaluate surgical performance, enabling comparisons among surgeons and institutions. In recent years, there has been a surge in complex indicators of perioperative short-term and long-term outcomes. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview and a critical analysis of surgical outcomes indicators, with a special emphasis on hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery. METHODS A narrative review of outcome measures was conducted using a combined text and MeSH search strategy to identify relevant articles focused on perioperative outcomes, specifically within HPB surgery. RESULTS The literature search yielded 624 records, and 94 studies were included in the analysis. Included papers were classified depending on whether they assessed intraoperative or postoperative specific or composite outcomes, and whether they assessed purely clinical or combined clinical and socio-economic indicators. Specific indicators included in composite outcomes were categorized into three main domains: intraoperative metrics, postoperative outcomes, and oncological outcomes. While postoperative mortality, complications, hospital stay and readmission were the indicators most frequently included in composite outcomes, oncological outcomes were rarely considered. CONCLUSIONS The evolution of surgical outcomes has shifted from the simplistic assessment of crude mortality rates to complex composite outcomes. Whether the recent explosion of publications on these topics has a clinical impact in real life is questionable. Outcomes from the patient perspective, integrating social and financial indicators, are not yet integrated into most of these composite analytical tools but should not be underestimated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Di Martino
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Marco Nicolazzi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Paolo Baroffio
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Michela Anna Polidoro
- Hepatobiliary Immunopathology Laboratory, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Amanda Pocorobba
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Eleonora Bottini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Novara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bardol T, Souche R, Druet C, Bertrand MM, Ferrandis C, Prudhomme M, Borie F, Fabre JM. Minimally invasive approach for retrorectal tumors above and below S3: a multicentric tertiary center retrospective study (MiaRT study). Tech Coloproctol 2024; 28:67. [PMID: 38860990 PMCID: PMC11166785 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-02938-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retrorectal tumors are uncommon lesions developed in the retrorectal space. Data on their minimally invasive resection are scarce and the optimal surgical approach for tumors below S3 remains debated. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive resection of retrorectal tumors between 2005 and 2022 at two tertiary university hospital centers, by comparing the results obtained for lesions located above or below S3. RESULTS Of over 41 patients identified with retrorectal tumors, surgical approach was minimally invasive for 23 patients, with laparoscopy alone in 19, with transanal excision in 2, and with combined approach in 2. Retrorectal tumor was above S3 in 11 patients (> S3 group) and below S3 in 12 patients (< S3 group). Patient characteristics and median tumor size were not significantly different between the two groups (60 vs 67 mm; p = 0.975). Overall median operative time was 131.5 min and conversion rate was 13% without significant difference between the two groups (126 vs 197 min and 18% vs 8%, respectively; p > 0.05). Final pathology was tailgut cyst (48%), schwannoma (22%), neural origin tumor (17%), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (4%), and other (19%). The 90-day complication rates were 27% and 58% in the > S3 and < S3 groups, respectively, without severe morbidity or mortality. After a median follow-up of 3.3 years, no recurrence was observed in both groups. Three patients presented chronic pain, three anal dysfunction, and three urinary dysfunction. All were successfully managed without reintervention. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive surgery for retrorectal tumors can be performed safely and effectively with low morbidity and no mortality. Laparoscopic and transanal techniques alone or in combination may be recommended as the treatment of choice of benign retrorectal tumors, even for lesions below S3, in centers experienced with minimally invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Bardol
- Digestive and Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier-Nîmes, 641 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34090, Montpellier, France.
| | - R Souche
- Digestive and Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier-Nîmes, 641 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34090, Montpellier, France
| | - C Druet
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier-Nîmes University, Montpellier, France
| | - M M Bertrand
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier-Nîmes University, Montpellier, France
| | - C Ferrandis
- Digestive and Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier-Nîmes, 641 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34090, Montpellier, France
| | - M Prudhomme
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier-Nîmes University, Montpellier, France
| | - F Borie
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier-Nîmes University, Montpellier, France
| | - J-M Fabre
- Digestive and Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier-Nîmes, 641 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34090, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alaimo L, Endo Y, Catalano G, Ruzzenente A, Aldrighetti L, Weiss M, Bauer TW, Alexandrescu S, Poultsides GA, Maithel SK, Marques HP, Martel G, Pulitano C, Shen F, Cauchy F, Koerkamp BG, Endo I, Kitago M, Pawlik TM. Benchmarks in Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3043-3052. [PMID: 38214817 PMCID: PMC10997542 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14880-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Benchmarking in surgery has been proposed as a means to compare results across institutions to establish best practices. We sought to define benchmark values for hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) across an international population. METHODS Patients who underwent liver resection for ICC between 1990 and 2020 were identified from an international database, including 14 Eastern and Western institutions. Patients operated on at high-volume centers who had no preoperative jaundice, ASA class <3, body mass index <35 km/m2, without need for bile duct or vascular resection were chosen as the benchmark group. RESULTS Among 1193 patients who underwent curative-intent hepatectomy for ICC, 600 (50.3%) were included in the benchmark group. Among benchmark patients, median age was 58.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 49.0-67.0), only 28 (4.7%) patients received neoadjuvant therapy, and most patients had a minor resection (n = 499, 83.2%). Benchmark values included ≥3 lymph nodes retrieved when lymphadenectomy was performed, blood loss ≤600 mL, perioperative blood transfusion rate ≤42.9%, and operative time ≤339 min. The postoperative benchmark values included TOO achievement ≥59.3%, positive resection margin ≤27.5%, 30-day readmission ≤3.6%, Clavien-Dindo III or more complications ≤14.3%, and 90-day mortality ≤4.8%, as well as hospital stay ≤14 days. CONCLUSIONS Benchmark cutoffs targeting short-term perioperative outcomes can help to facilitate comparisons across hospitals performing liver resection for ICC, assess inter-institutional variation, and identify the highest-performing centers to improve surgical and oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Alaimo
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | - Matthew Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Todd W Bauer
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Hugo P Marques
- Department of Surgery, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Carlo Pulitano
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Feng Shen
- Department of Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - François Cauchy
- Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Minoru Kitago
- Department of Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Laroche S, Lim C, Goumard C, Rayar M, Cherqui D, Chiche L, Barbier L, Salamé E, Mabrut JY, Lesurtel M, Truant S, Boleslawski E, Muscari F, Hobeika C, Chirica M, Buc E, Hardwigsen J, Herrero A, Navarro F, Faitot F, Bachellier P, Regimbeau JM, Laurent A, Fuks D, Soubrane O, Azoulay D, Vibert E, Scatton O. Comparing indications, complexity and outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection between centers with and without a liver transplant program: a French nationwide study. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:586-593. [PMID: 38341287 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no data to evaluate the difference in populations and impact of centers with liver transplant programs in performing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). METHODS This was a multicenter study including patients undergoing LLR for benign and malignant tumors at 27 French centers from 1996 to 2018. The main outcomes were postoperative severe morbidity and mortality. RESULTS A total of 3154 patients were included, and 14 centers were classified as transplant centers (N = 2167 patients, 68.7 %). The transplant centers performed more difficult LLRs and more resections for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients who more frequently had cirrhosis. A higher rate of performing the Pringle maneuver, a lower rate of blood loss and a higher rate of open conversion (all p < 0.05) were observed in the transplant centers. There was no association between the presence of a liver transplant program and either postoperative severe morbidity (<10 % in each group; p = 0.228) or mortality (1 % in each group; p = 0.915). CONCLUSIONS Most HCCs, difficult LLRs, and cirrhotic patients are treated in transplant centers. We show that all centers can achieve comparable safety and quality of care in LLR independent of the presence of a liver transplant program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Laroche
- Sorbonne University, Paris, France; Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Chetana Lim
- Sorbonne University, Paris, France; Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Research Unit, Université de Picardie-Jules Verne, UR UPJV 7518 SSPC, Amiens, France
| | - Claire Goumard
- Sorbonne University, Paris, France; Centre de Recherche de Saint-Antoine (CRSA), INSERM, UMRS-938, Paris, France
| | - Michel Rayar
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Claude Huriez Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Laurence Chiche
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Bordeaux University Hospital-Magellan Centre, Bordeaux, France
| | - Louise Barbier
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Bordeaux University Hospital-Magellan Centre, Bordeaux, France
| | - Ephrem Salamé
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Trousseau Hospital, Tours Regional University Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Jean-Yves Mabrut
- Department of Hepatopancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, La Croix Rousse Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Mickael Lesurtel
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Emmanuel Boleslawski
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Claude Huriez Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Fabrice Muscari
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Rangueil Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Christian Hobeika
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Mircea Chirica
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Emmanuel Buc
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Estaing Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jean Hardwigsen
- Department of Hepatopancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Astrid Herrero
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Saint-Eloi Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Francis Navarro
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Saint-Eloi Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - François Faitot
- Department of Hepatopancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Philippe Bachellier
- Department of Hepatopancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jean-Marc Regimbeau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France; Research Unit, Université de Picardie-Jules Verne, UR UPJV 7518 SSPC, Amiens, France
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, APHP Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, APHP Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Sorbonne University, Paris, France; Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris France
| | - Daniel Azoulay
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Eric Vibert
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Sorbonne University, Paris, France; Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Centre de Recherche de Saint-Antoine (CRSA), INSERM, UMRS-938, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
D'Silva M, Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Lee HW, Lee BR, Kang MY, Park YS, Kim JJ. Achieving Textbook Outcomes after Laparoscopic Resection in Posterosuperior Segments of the Liver: The Impact of the Learning Curve. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:930. [PMID: 38473292 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Achieving textbook outcomes (TOs) improves the short-term and long-term performance of a hospital. Our objective was to assess TOs in the laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of tumors in the PS (posterosuperior) section of the liver and identify the impact of the learning curve. We conducted a retrospective cohort study analyzing patients who underwent LLR for lesions located in the PS segments. Patients were divided into a TO and no-TO group. TOs were defined as negative margins, no transfusion, no readmission, no major complications, no 30-day mortality, and a length of stay ≤ 50th percentile. Patients' outcomes were assessed in two study periods before and after 2015. TOs were achieved in 47.6% (n = 117). In multivariable analysis, obesity (p = 0.001), shorter operation time (p < 0.001), less blood loss (p < 0.001), normal albumin (p = 0.003), and minor resection (p = 0.046) were significantly associated with achieving TOs. Although the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (p = 0.096) was not significantly different, the 5-year overall survival rate was significantly greater in the TO group (p = 0.001). Body mass index > 25 kg/m2 (p = 0.020), age > 65 years (p = 0.049), and achievement of TOs (p = 0.024) were independently associated with survival. The proportion of patients who achieved a TO was higher after 2015 than before 2015 (52.3% vs. 36.1%; p = 0.022). TOs are important markers not only for assessing hospital and surgeon performance but also as predictors of overall survival. As the number of surgeons who achieve the learning curve increases, the number of patients with TOs will gradually increase with a subsequent improvement in overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mizelle D'Silva
- Department of Surgery, Holy Family Hospital and Research Centre, Bandra, Mumbai 400050, India
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Jai-Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae-Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Bo-Ram Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Mee-Young Kang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Ye-Shong Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Ju Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 13620, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hołówko W, Serednicki W, Bartkowiak M, Wysocki M, Domurat M, Mielko J, Pierściński S, Hogendorf P, Masior Ł, Kalinowski P, Wierdak M, Frączek M, Tarasik A, Wróblewski T, Budzyński A, Pędziwiatr M, Grąt M. Early adoption of laparoscopic liver surgery in Poland: a national retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:361-371. [PMID: 37816169 PMCID: PMC10793755 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need for safe and efficient dissemination of minimally invasive approach in liver surgery is among the current challenges for hepatobiliary surgeons. After the stage of innovators and pioneers, the following countries should adopt a laparoscopic approach. The aim of this study was to assess the national experience and trend in implementing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in Poland. MATERIALS AND METHODS A national registry of LLR performed in Poland was established in June 2020. All LLR cases performed before were included retrospectively, followed by prospectively collected new cases. Baseline characteristics, preoperative and intraoperative data, short-term results and long-term follow-up were recorded. RESULTS Since 2010 up to the end of 2022 there were 718 LLRs performed in Poland. The national rate of laparoscopic approach has gradually increased since 2017 ( P <0.001), reaching the rate of 11.7% in 2022. There were 443 (61.7%), 107 (14.9%), and 168 (23.4%) LLRs performed in accordance to increasing grades of difficulty. The move towards more demanding cases had an increasing trend over the years ( P <0.001). Total intraoperative adverse event and postoperative severe complications rates were estimated for 13.5% ( n =97) and 6.7% ( n =48), respectively. 30-day reoperation, readmission and postoperative mortality rates were 3.6% ( n =26), 2.8% ( n =20), and 0.8% ( n =6), respectively. While the R0 resection margin was assessed in 643 (89.6%) cases, the total textbook outcomes (TO) were achieved in 525 (74.5%) cases. Overcoming the learning curve of 60 LLRs, resulted in an increasing TO rate from 72.3 to 80.6% ( P =0.024). CONCLUSIONS It is the first national analysis of a laparoscopic approach in liver surgery in Poland. An increasing trend of minimizing invasiveness in liver resection has been observed. Responsible selection of cases in accordance with difficulty may provide results within global benchmark values and textbook outcomes already during the learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wojciech Serednicki
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow
| | | | - Michał Wysocki
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital
| | - Marian Domurat
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Regional Oncological Center, Białystok, Poland
| | - Jerzy Mielko
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin
| | - Stanisław Pierściński
- Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Nicolaus Copernicus University Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz
| | - Piotr Hogendorf
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Łódź, Barlicki Teaching Hospital, Łódź
| | - Łukasz Masior
- Department of General Transplant and Liver Surgery
- Department of General, Vascular and Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw
| | | | - Mateusz Wierdak
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow
| | - Mariusz Frączek
- Department of General, Vascular and Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw
| | - Aleksander Tarasik
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Regional Oncological Center, Białystok, Poland
| | | | - Andrzej Budzyński
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital
| | - Michał Pędziwiatr
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow
| | - Michał Grąt
- Department of General Transplant and Liver Surgery
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alaimo L, Moazzam Z, Lima HA, Endo Y, Ruzzenente A, Guglielmi A, Ratti F, Aldrighetti L, Weiss M, Bauer TW, Alexandrescu S, Popescu I, Poultsides GA, Maithel SK, Marques HP, Martel G, Pulitano C, Shen F, Cauchy F, Koerkamp BG, Endo I, Kitago M, Aucejo F, Sasaki K, Fields RC, Hugh T, Lam V, Pawlik TM. An attempt to establish and apply global benchmarks for liver resection of malignant hepatic tumors. Surgery 2023; 174:1384-1392. [PMID: 37741777 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benchmarking is a process of continuous self-evaluation and comparison with best-in-class hospitals to guide quality improvement initiatives. We sought to define global benchmarks relative to liver resection for malignancy and to assess their achievement in hospitals in the United States. METHODS Patients who underwent curative-intent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, or colorectal or neuroendocrine liver metastases between 2000 and 2019 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance baseline characteristics between open and minimally invasive approaches. Best-in-class hospitals were defined relative to the achievement rate of textbook oncologic outcomes and case volume. Benchmark values were established relative to best-in-class institutions. The achievement of benchmark values among hospitals in the National Cancer Database was then assessed. RESULTS Among 2,624 patients treated at 20 centers, a majority underwent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1,609, 61.3%), followed by colorectal liver metastases (n = 650, 24.8%), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 299, 11.4%), and neuroendocrine liver metastases (n = 66, 2.5%). Notably, 1,947 (74.2%) patients achieved a textbook oncologic outcome. After propensity score matching, 6 best-in-class hospitals with the highest textbook oncologic outcome rates (≥75.0%) were identified. Benchmark values were calculated for margin positivity (≤11.7%), 30-day readmission (≤4.1%), 30-day mortality (≤1.6%), minor postoperative complications (≤24.7%), severe complications (≤12.4%), and failure to achieve the textbook oncologic outcome (≤22.8%). Among the National Cancer Database hospitals, global benchmarks for margin positivity, 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, severe complications, and textbook oncologic outcome failure were achieved in 62.9%, 27.1%, 12.1%, 7.1%, and 29.3% of centers, respectively. CONCLUSION These global benchmarks may help identify hospitals that may benefit from quality improvement initiatives, aiming to improve patient safety and surgical oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Alaimo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Zorays Moazzam
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Henrique A Lima
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | | | - Matthew Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Todd W Bauer
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Irinel Popescu
- Department of Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | | | - Hugo P Marques
- Department of Surgery, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Carlo Pulitano
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Feng Shen
- Department of Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - François Cauchy
- Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Minoru Kitago
- Department of Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Federico Aucejo
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH
| | | | - Ryan C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Tom Hugh
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Vincent Lam
- Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Choi WJ, Babakhani S, Claasen MPAW, Castelo M, Bucur R, Gaviria F, Jones O, Shwaartz C, McCluskey SA, McGilvray I, Gallinger S, Moulton CA, Reichman T, Cleary S, Sapisochin G. Performance evaluation of a North American center using the established global benchmark for laparoscopic liver resections: A retrospective study. Surgery 2023; 174:1393-1400. [PMID: 37863687 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global benchmark cut-offs were set for laparoscopic liver resection procedures: left lateral sectionectomy, left hepatectomy, and right hepatectomy. We aimed to compare the performance of our North American center with the established global benchmarks. METHODS This is a single-center study of adults who underwent laparoscopic liver resection between 2010 to 2022 at the Toronto General Hospital. Fourteen benchmarking outcomes were assessed: operation time, intraoperative blood transfusion, estimated blood loss, blood loss ≥500 mL, blood loss ≥1000mL, open-conversion, postoperative length of stay, return to operation, postoperative morbidity, postoperative major-morbidity, 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, R1 resection, and failure to rescue. Low-risk benchmark cases were defined as follows: patients aged 18 to 70 years, American Society of Anesthesiologist score ≤ 2, tumor size <10 cm, and Child-Pugh score ≤A. Cases involving bilio-enteric anastomosis, hilar dissection, or concomitant major procedures were excluded from the low-risk category. Cases that did not meet the criteria for low-risk selection were considered high-risk cases. RESULTS A total of 178 laparoscopic liver resection cases were analyzed (109 left lateral sectionectomies, 45 left hepatectomies, 24 right hepatectomies). Forty-four (25%) cases qualified as low-risk cases (23 left lateral sectionectomies, 16 left hepatectomies, 5 right hepatectomies). The postoperative major morbidity and 90-day mortality after left lateral sectionectomy, left hepatectomy, and right hepatectomy for the low-risk cases were 0%, 0%, and 0%, and 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. For the high-risk cases post-2017, the outcomes in the same order were 0%, 0%, and 12%; 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. For the high-risk cases operated pre2017, the outcomes in the same order were 9%∗, 16%∗, and 18%; 2%∗, 0%, and 9%∗ (asterisks indicate not meeting the global cut-off), respectively. CONCLUSION A North American center was able to achieve outcomes comparable to the established global benchmark for laparoscopic liver resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Jin Choi
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. https://twitter.com/WJChoiMD
| | - Shiva Babakhani
- University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marco P A W Claasen
- University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew Castelo
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Roxana Bucur
- University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Felipe Gaviria
- University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Owen Jones
- University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chaya Shwaartz
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stuart A McCluskey
- Department of Anesthesia, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ian McGilvray
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carol-Anne Moulton
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Trevor Reichman
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sean Cleary
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu Q, Zhang W, Zhao JJ, Syn NL, Cipriani F, Alzoubi M, Aghayan DL, Siow TF, Lim C, Scatton O, Herman P, Coelho FF, Marino MV, Mazzaferro V, Chiow AKH, Sucandy I, Ivanecz A, Choi SH, Lee JH, Prieto M, Vivarelli M, Giuliante F, Dalla Valle B, Ruzzenente A, Yong CC, Chen Z, Yin M, Fondevila C, Efanov M, Morise Z, Di Benedetto F, Brustia R, Dalla Valle R, Boggi U, Geller D, Belli A, Memeo R, Gruttadauria S, Mejia A, Park JO, Rotellar F, Choi GH, Robles-Campos R, Wang X, Sutcliffe RP, Schmelzle M, Pratschke J, Tang CN, Chong CCN, Lee KF, Meurs J, D'Hondt M, Monden K, Lopez-Ben S, Kingham TP, Ferrero A, Ettorre GM, Levi Sandri GB, Saleh M, Cherqui D, Zheng J, Liang X, Mazzotta A, Soubrane O, Wakabayashi G, Troisi RI, Cheung TT, Kato Y, Sugioka A, D'Silva M, Han HS, Nghia PP, Long TCD, Edwin B, Fuks D, Chen KH, Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Liu R, Goh BKP. Propensity-score Matched and Coarsened-exact Matched Analysis Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study of 4822 Cases. Ann Surg 2023; 278:969-975. [PMID: 37058429 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes between robotic major hepatectomy (R-MH) and laparoscopic major hepatectomy (L-MH). BACKGROUND Robotic techniques may overcome the limitations of laparoscopic liver resection. However, it is unknown whether R-MH is superior to L-MH. METHODS This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of patients undergoing R-MH or L-MH at 59 international centers from 2008 to 2021. Data on patient demographics, center experience volume, perioperative outcomes, and tumor characteristics were collected and analyzed. Both 1:1 propensity-score matched (PSM) and coarsened-exact matched (CEM) analyses were performed to minimize selection bias between both groups. RESULTS A total of 4822 cases met the study criteria, of which 892 underwent R-MH and 3930 underwent L-MH. Both 1:1 PSM (841 R-MH vs. 841 L-MH) and CEM (237 R-MH vs. 356 L-MH) were performed. R-MH was associated with significantly less blood loss {PSM:200.0 [interquartile range (IQR):100.0, 450.0] vs 300.0 (IQR:150.0, 500.0) mL; P = 0.012; CEM:170.0 (IQR: 90.0, 400.0) vs 200.0 (IQR:100.0, 400.0) mL; P = 0.006}, lower rates of Pringle maneuver application (PSM: 47.1% vs 63.0%; P < 0.001; CEM: 54.0% vs 65.0%; P = 0.007) and open conversion (PSM: 5.1% vs 11.9%; P < 0.001; CEM: 5.5% vs 10.4%, P = 0.04) compared with L-MH. On subset analysis of 1273 patients with cirrhosis, R-MH was associated with a lower postoperative morbidity rate (PSM: 19.5% vs 29.9%; P = 0.02; CEM 10.4% vs 25.5%; P = 0.02) and shorter postoperative stay [PSM: 6.9 (IQR: 5.0, 9.0) days vs 8.0 (IQR: 6.0 11.3) days; P < 0.001; CEM 7.0 (IQR: 5.0, 9.0) days vs 7.0 (IQR: 6.0, 10.0) days; P = 0.047]. CONCLUSIONS This international multicenter study demonstrated that R-MH was comparable to L-MH in safety and was associated with reduced blood loss, lower rates of Pringle maneuver application, and conversion to open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qu Liu
- The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Organ Transplantation Department, The Third Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wanguang Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center and Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Joseph J Zhao
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicholas L Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Davit L Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tiing-Foong Siow
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chetana Lim
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Paulo Herman
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy and General Surgery Department, F. Tappeiner Hospital, Merano, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Adrian K H Chiow
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Sung-Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mikel Prieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, United Hospital of Ancona, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Bernardo Dalla Valle
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, GB Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, GB Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Chee-Chien Yong
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Zewei Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Mengqiu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain and General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Zenichi Morise
- Department of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Raffaele Dalla Valle
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - David Geller
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center-IRCCS-G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatc-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy, Palermo, Italy and Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Alejandro Mejia
- The Liver Institute, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - James O Park
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center. Seattle, WA
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of General Surgery, HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain and Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gi-Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chung-Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Charing C N Chong
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kit-Fai Lee
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Juul Meurs
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Santiago Lopez-Ben
- Department of Surgery, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, IdIBGi, Girona, Spain
| | | | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery. Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Mansour Saleh
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Junhao Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Alessandro Mazzotta
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yutaro Kato
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Mizelle D'Silva
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Phan Phuoc Nghia
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Tran Cong Duy Long
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Kuo-Hsin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, United Kingdom and Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Rong Liu
- The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Duke National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Turco C, Hobeika C, Allard MA, Tabchouri N, Brustia R, Nguyen T, Cauchy F, Barbier L, Salamé E, Cherqui D, Vibert E, Soubrane O, Scatton O, Goumard C. Open Versus Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Sequential TACE-PVE: A Multicentric Comparative Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6615-6625. [PMID: 37394670 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13752-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Right hepatectomy (RH) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is ideally preceded by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and portal vein embolization (PVE). Laparoscopic approach improves short-term outcome and textbook outcome (TO), which reflects the "ideal" surgical outcome, after RH. However, laparoscopic RH on an underlying diseased liver and after TACE/PVE remains a challenging procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) or open liver resection (OLR) following TACE/PVE. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients with HCC who underwent RH after TACE/PVE in five French centers were retrospectively included. Outcomes were compared between the LLR group and the OLR group using propensity score matching (PSM). Quality of surgical care was defined by TO. RESULTS Between 2005 and 2019, 117 patients were included (41 in LLR group, 76 in OLR group). Overall morbidity was comparable (51% versus 53%, p = 0.24). In LLR group, TO was completed in 66% versus 37% in OLR group (p = 0.02). LLR and absence of clamping were the only factors associated with TO completion [hazard ratio (HR) 4.27, [1.77-10.28], p = 0.001]. After PSM, 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 55% in matched LLR versus 77% in matched OLR, p = 0.35, and 13% in matched LLR versus 17% in matched OLR, p = 0.97. TO completion was independently associated with a better 5-year OS (65.2% versus 42.5%, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION Major LLR after TACE/PVE should be considered as a valuable option in expert centers to increase the chance of TO, the latter being associated with a better 5-year OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Célia Turco
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche Saint Antoine, INSERM UMRS-938, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), Paris, France
| | - Christian Hobeika
- Department of Hepato-Biliary, Liver Transplantation, and Pancreatic Surgery, Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Marc-Antoine Allard
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Université Paris Saclay, Inserm U 935, Villejuif, France
| | - Nicolas Tabchouri
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Oncologique, Endocrinienne et Transplantation Hépatique, CHRU Hôpital Trousseau, Chambray, Tours, France
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, APHP, Créteil, France
| | - Tu Nguyen
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - François Cauchy
- Department of Hepato-Biliary, Liver Transplantation, and Pancreatic Surgery, Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Louise Barbier
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Oncologique, Endocrinienne et Transplantation Hépatique, CHRU Hôpital Trousseau, Chambray, Tours, France
| | - Ephrem Salamé
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Oncologique, Endocrinienne et Transplantation Hépatique, CHRU Hôpital Trousseau, Chambray, Tours, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, APHP, Créteil, France
| | - Eric Vibert
- Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, APHP, Créteil, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Hepato-Biliary, Liver Transplantation, and Pancreatic Surgery, Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche Saint Antoine, INSERM UMRS-938, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), Paris, France
| | - Claire Goumard
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
- Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche Saint Antoine, INSERM UMRS-938, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sweigert PJ, Ramia JM, Villodre C, Carbonell-Morote S, De-la-Plaza R, Serradilla M, Pawlik TM. Textbook Outcomes in Liver Surgery: a Systematic Review. J Gastrointest Surg 2023:10.1007/s11605-023-05673-1. [PMID: 37069461 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05673-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessment of the quality of care among patients undergoing hepatectomy may be inadequate using traditional "siloed" postoperative surgical outcome metrics. In turn, the combination of several quality metrics into a single composite Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery (TOLS) may be more representative of "ideal" surgical care. METHODS Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a search for primary articles on post-operative TOLS evaluation after hepatectomy was performed. Studies that did not present hepatectomy outcomes, pediatric or transplantation populations, duplicated series, and editorials were excluded. Studies were evaluated in aggregate for methodological variation, TOLS rates, factors associated with TOLS, hospital variation, and overall findings. RESULTS Among 207 identified publications, 32 observational cohort studies were selected for inclusion in the review. There was a total of 90,077 hepatic resections performed from 1993 to 2020 in the analytic cohort. While TOLS definitions varied widely, all studies used an "all-or-none" composite structure combining a median of 5 (range: 4-7) discrete parameters. Observed TOLS rates varied in the different reported populations from 11.2 to 77.0%. TOLS was associated with patient, hospital, and operative factors. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review summarizes the contemporary international experience with TOLS to assess surgical performance following hepatobiliary surgery. TOLS is a single composite metric that may be more patient-centered, as well as better suited to quantify "optimal" care and compare performance among centers performing liver surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J Sweigert
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jose M Ramia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Pintor Baeza, 11, 03010, Alicante, Spain.
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria y Biomedica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.
- Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain.
| | - Celia Villodre
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Pintor Baeza, 11, 03010, Alicante, Spain
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria y Biomedica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
| | - Silvia Carbonell-Morote
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Pintor Baeza, 11, 03010, Alicante, Spain
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria y Biomedica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goh BKP, Han HS, Chen KH, Chua DW, Chan CY, Cipriani F, Aghayan DL, Fretland AA, Sijberden J, D'Silva M, Siow TF, Kato Y, Lim C, Nghia PP, Herman P, Marino MV, Mazzaferro V, Chiow AKH, Sucandy I, Ivanecz A, Choi SH, Lee JH, Gastaca M, Vivarelli M, Giuliante F, Ruzzenente A, Yong CC, Yin M, Chen Z, Fondevila C, Efanov M, Rotellar F, Choi GH, Campos RR, Wang X, Sutcliffe RP, Pratschke J, Lai E, Chong CC, D'Hondt M, Monden K, Lopez-Ben S, Coelho FF, Kingham TP, Liu R, Long TCD, Ferrero A, Sandri GBL, Saleh M, Cherqui D, Scatton O, Soubrane O, Wakabayashi G, Troisi RI, Cheung TT, Sugioka A, Hilal MA, Fuks D, Edwin B, Aldrighetti L. Defining Global Benchmarks for Laparoscopic Liver Resections: An International Multicenter Study. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e839-e848. [PMID: 35837974 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish global benchmark outcomes indicators after laparoscopic liver resections (L-LR). BACKGROUND There is limited published data to date on the best achievable outcomes after L-LR. METHODS This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 11,983 patients undergoing L-LR in 45 international centers in 4 continents between 2015 and 2020. Three specific procedures: left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), left hepatectomy (LH), and right hepatectomy (RH) were selected to represent the 3 difficulty levels of L-LR. Fifteen outcome indicators were selected to establish benchmark cutoffs. RESULTS There were 3519 L-LR (LLS, LH, RH) of which 1258 L-LR (40.6%) cases performed in 34 benchmark expert centers qualified as low-risk benchmark cases. These included 659 LLS (52.4%), 306 LH (24.3%), and 293 RH (23.3%). The benchmark outcomes established for operation time, open conversion rate, blood loss ≥500 mL, blood transfusion rate, postoperative morbidity, major morbidity, and 90-day mortality after LLS, LH, and RH were 209.5, 302, and 426 minutes; 2.1%, 13.4%, and 13.0%; 3.2%, 20%, and 47.1%; 0%, 7.1%, and 10.5%; 11.1%, 20%, and 50%; 0%, 7.1%, and 20%; and 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study established the first global benchmark outcomes for L-LR in a large-scale international patient cohort. It provides an up-to-date reference regarding the "best achievable" results for L-LR for which centers adopting L-LR can use as a comparison to enable an objective assessment of performance gaps and learning curves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery,, Singapore General Hospital, National Cancer Centre Singapore and Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kuo-Hsin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Darren W Chua
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery,, Singapore General Hospital, National Cancer Centre Singapore and Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery,, Singapore General Hospital, National Cancer Centre Singapore and Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Davit L Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Asmund A Fretland
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jasper Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia,Italy
| | - Mizelle D'Silva
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tiing Foong Siow
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yutaro Kato
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Chetana Lim
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Pitie Salpetriere Hospital, APHP Paris, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Phan Phuoc Nghia
- HPB Surgery Department, University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Paulo Herman
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy
- Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mikel Gastaca
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, United Hospital of Ancona, Department of Sperimental and Clinical Medicine Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, University of Verona, GB Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Chee-Chien Yong
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Mengqui Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Zewei Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, University Clinic of Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gi-Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ricardo R Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eric Lai
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Charing C Chong
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Santiago Lopez-Ben
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, IdIBGi, Girona, Spain
| | - Fabricio F Coelho
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tran Cong Duy Long
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Mansour Saleh
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Pitie Salpetriere Hospital, APHP Paris, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic, and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Division of HPB, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia,Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic, and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Aliseda D, Zozaya G, Martí-Cruchaga P, Lujan J, Almeida A, Blanco N, Sabatella L, Sangro B, Rotellar F. Minimally invasive liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with portal hypertension. BJS Open 2023; 7:7146620. [PMID: 37115654 PMCID: PMC10146929 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Aliseda
- Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gabriel Zozaya
- Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Pablo Martí-Cruchaga
- Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Juan Lujan
- Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ana Almeida
- Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Nuria Blanco
- Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Lucas Sabatella
- Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
- Liver Unit and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Oncology Area, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wu Y, Li S, Yuan J, Zhang H, Wang M, Zhang Z, Qin R. Benchmarking: a novel measuring tool for outcome comparisons in surgery. Int J Surg 2023; 109:419-428. [PMID: 37093075 PMCID: PMC10389472 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Benchmarking, a novel measuring tool for outcome comparisons, is a recent concept in surgery. The objectives of this review are to examine the concept, definition, and evolution of benchmarking and its application in surgery. METHODS The literature about benchmarking was reviewed through an ever-narrowing search strategy, commencing from the concept, definition, and evolution of benchmarking to the application of benchmarking and experiences of benchmarking in surgery. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Science Direct databases were searched until 20 September 2022, in the English language according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RESULTS In the first phase of the literature search, the development of benchmarking was identified. The definitions of benchmarking evolved from a surveying term to a novel quality-improvement tool to assess the best achievable results in surgery. In the second phase, a total of 23 studies were identified about benchmarking in surgery, including esophagectomy, hepatic surgery, pancreatic surgery, rectum resection, and bariatric surgery. All studies were multicenter analyses from national, international, or global expert centers. Most studies (87.0%) adopted the definition that benchmark was the 75th percentile of the median values of centers. Performance metrics to define benchmarks were clinically relevant intraoperative and postoperative outcome indicators. CONCLUSION Benchmarking in surgery is a novel quality-improvement tool to define and measure the best achievable results, establishing a meaningful reference to evaluate surgical performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Wu
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jaén-Torrejimeno I, Ramia JM, López-Guerra D, Rojas-Holguín A, De-Armas-Conde N, Blanco-Fernández G. Textbook outcome in the surgical treatment of liver hydatid cyst. Surgery 2023; 173:429-434. [PMID: 36334979 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome is a composite measure used in surgery to define the ideal postoperative period and to assess the quality of care. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of textbook outcome and the factors independently associated with its achievement following surgical treatment of liver hydatid cysts. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of patients operated on for liver hydatid cysts between January 2006 and December 2021. Textbook outcome was achieved when all the following criteria were fulfilled: no mortality within 90 days, no major complications within 90 days, no hospital readmission within 90 days, and no prolonged hospital stay. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with textbook outcome. RESULTS During the study period, 296 patients underwent surgery. Textbook outcome was recorded in 65.9% (195/296). Female gender (odds ratio 2.02; P = .010), noncomplicated cyst (odds ratio 3.97, P < .001), and radical surgery (odds ratio 2.26, P = .003) were the variables associated with a higher probability of achieving textbook outcome. CONCLUSION Textbook outcome may be a useful measure to assess the variations in surgical management between different centers, and to improve quality of care after liver hydatid cysts resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - José M Ramia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain
| | - Diego López-Guerra
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplant Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Spain; Universidad de Extremadura, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
| | - Adela Rojas-Holguín
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplant Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Spain; Universidad de Extremadura, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
| | - Noelia De-Armas-Conde
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplant Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Spain
| | - Gerardo Blanco-Fernández
- Universidad de Extremadura, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud; Department of HBP and Liver Transplant Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wu DH, Liao CY, Wang DF, Huang L, Li G, Chen JZ, Wang L, Lin TS, Lai JL, Zhou SQ, Qiu FN, Zhang ZB, Chen YL, Wang YD, Zheng XC, Tian YF, Chen S. Textbook outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with sarcopenia: A multicenter analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 49:802-810. [PMID: 36586787 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of sarcopenia on textbook outcome (TO) after hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between sarcopenia and TO, to clarify its long and short-term prognostic value, and to develop a nomogram model based on sarcopenia and TO for survival prediction. METHODS Patients who underwent HCC resection between January 2012 and March 2017 in three large hospitals in Fujian were retrospectively recruited and divided into sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups based on skeletal muscle index (SMI) values. TO was defined as no 30-day morality, no 30-day readmission, negative margins, no prolonged hospital stay, and no major complications. Multivariate regression was used to screen for clinical factors associated with TO. Nomograms of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after hepatectomy for HCC were developed. RESULTS A total of 1172 patients were included in the study. The TO rates were 28.74% (121/421 patients) in the sarcopenia group and 43.4% (326/751 patients) in the non-sarcopenia group. The results showed that sarcopenia was an independent predictor of TO (p < 0.001), TO was an independent predictor of perioperative treatment-related sarcopenia (PTRS)(p = 0.002), and TO was an independent predictor of OS and RFS (p < 0.001). Nomogram models based on sarcopenia and TO were generated and accurately predicted OS and RFS at 1, 3, and 5 years. CONCLUSION Both sarcopenia and TO are independent predictors of OS and RFS after HCC resection. Sarcopenia was an independent predictor of TO. Sarcopenia influenced long-term survival by affecting short-term postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di-Hang Wu
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Cheng-Yu Liao
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Dan-Feng Wang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Long Huang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ge Li
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | | | - Liang Wang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Tian-Sheng Lin
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Lin Lai
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Song-Qiang Zhou
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Fu-Nan Qiu
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Bo Zhang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yan-Ling Chen
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yao-Dong Wang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Chun Zheng
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yi-Feng Tian
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
| | - Shi Chen
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Liu L, Wang Y, Wu T, Lin J, Deng L, Jiang J, An T. Robotic versus laparoscopic major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcomes from a single institution. BMC Surg 2022; 22:432. [PMID: 36528768 PMCID: PMC9759871 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01882-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, an increasing number of robotic major hepatectomies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are being performed. Despite the advantages of robotic surgery over laparoscopic procedures, studies comparing robotic with laparoscopic major hepatectomy in terms of short-term results remain scarce. This study was performed to compare robotic major hepatectomy and laparoscopic major hepatectomy in terms of their intraoperative and postoperative results. METHODS Data regarding demographics and intraoperative and postoperative results of 131 patients undergoing robotic or laparoscopic major hepatectomy between January 2017 and March 2022 were retrieved from their medical records and compared between the two types of surgery. RESULTS Between January 2017 and March 2022, 44 robotic major hepatectomies and 87 laparoscopic major hepatectomies were performed at the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shenzhen People's Hospital. Patients undergoing robotic major hepatectomy were not significantly different from those undergoing laparoscopic major hepatectomy in terms of age (P = 0.397), sex (P = 0.624), body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.118), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (P = 0.09), tumor size (P = 0.176), cirrhosis (P = 0.384), fatty liver (P = 0.162), preoperative antiviral treatment (P = 0.934), hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (P = 0.646) and operation type (P = 0.054). Robotic major hepatectomy was associated with a longer operation time (median: 255.5 versus 206.8 min; P < 0.001) and less estimated blood loss (median: 118.9 versus 197.0 ml; P = 0.002) than laparoscopic major hepatectomy. However, robotic major hepatectomy was not significantly different from laparoscopic major hepatectomy regarding length of postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.849), open conversion (P = 0.077), ICU stay (P = 0.866), postoperative massive abdominal bleeding (P = 1.00), portal vein thrombosis (P = 1.00), abdominal infection (P = 1.00), pulmonary infection (P = 1.00), pulmonary embolism (P = 1.00), cardiac complications (P = 1.00), liver failure (P = 1.00), kidney failure (P = 1.00), biliary leak (P = 1.00), positive resection margin (P = 1.00), 30-day mortality (P = 1.00) and 90-day mortality (P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS Robotic major hepatectomy was as effective as laparoscopic surgery in terms of intraoperative and postoperative results but took longer and could more efficiently control intraoperative blood loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linsen Liu
- grid.440218.b0000 0004 1759 7210Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Dongmen North Road 1017, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518020 Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| | - Yan Wang
- grid.440218.b0000 0004 1759 7210Department of Radiology, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Dongmen North Road 1017, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518020 Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| | - Tianchong Wu
- grid.440218.b0000 0004 1759 7210Department of Radiology, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Dongmen North Road 1017, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518020 Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| | - Jianwei Lin
- grid.440218.b0000 0004 1759 7210Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Dongmen North Road 1017, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518020 Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| | - Lingna Deng
- Department of Pathology, Qing Yuan People’s Hospital, Yinquan Road B24, Qingcheng District, Qingyuan, 511518 Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiling Jiang
- The First Department of Surgery, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Fuhua Road 1, Futian District, Shenzhen, 518033 Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| | - Tailai An
- grid.440218.b0000 0004 1759 7210Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Dongmen North Road 1017, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518020 Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Textbook outcomes and benchmarks of minimally invasive left lateral sectionectomy across North America. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:2980-2986. [PMID: 36513782 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09780-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive approach represents the gold standard for the resection of the left lateral section of the liver. Recently, the American Minimally Invasive Liver Resection (AMILES) registry has become available to track outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic liver resection in the Americas. The aim of the present study is to determine the benchmark performance of MILLS throughout the AMILES database. METHODS The AMILES registry was interrogated for cases of minimally invasive left lateral sectionectomies (MILLS). Centers with best practices according to the achievement of textbook outcomes (TOs) were identified and were used to define benchmark performances. RESULTS Seven institutions from US and Canada entered 1665 minimally invasive liver resections, encompassing 203 MILLS. Overall, 49% of cases of MILLS satisfied contemporarily all textbook outcomes. While all centers obtained TOs with different rates of success, the outcomes of the top-ranking centers were used for benchmarking. Benchmark performance metrics of MILLS across North America are: conversion rate ≤ 3.7%, blood loss ≤ 200 ml, OR time ≤ 199 min, transfusion rate ≤ 4.5%, complication rate ≤ 7.9%, LOS ≤ 4 days. CONCLUSION Benchmark performances of MILLS have been defined on a large multi-institutional database in North America. As more institutions join the collaboration and more prospective cases accrue, benchmark for additional procedures and approaches will be defined.
Collapse
|
19
|
Pretzsch E, Koliogiannis D, D’Haese JG, Ilmer M, Guba MO, Angele MK, Werner J, Niess H. Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review. BJS Open 2022; 6:6855255. [PMID: 36449597 PMCID: PMC9710735 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure reflecting the ideal outcome after surgery. As a benchmarking tool, it provides an objective overview of quality of care. Uniform definitions of TO in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery are missing. This study aimed to provide a definition of TO in HPB surgery and identify obstacles and predictors for achieving it. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 1993 and 2021 were retrieved. After selection, two independent reviewers extracted descriptive statistics and derived summary estimates of the occurrence of TO criteria and obstacles for achieving TO using co-occurrence maps. RESULTS Overall, 30 studies were included. TO rates ranged between 16-69 per cent. Commonly chosen co-occurring criteria to define TO included 'no prolonged length of stay (LOS)', 'no complications', 'no readmission', and 'no deaths'. Major obstacles for achieving TO in HPB surgery were prolonged LOS, complications, and readmission. On multivariable analysis, TO predicted better overall and disease-free survival in patients with cancer. Achievement of TO was more likely in dedicated centres and associated with procedural and structural indicators, including high case-mix index and surgical volume. CONCLUSION TO is a useful quality measure to benchmark surgical outcome. Future definitions of TO in HPB surgery should include 'no prolonged LOS', 'no complications', 'no readmission', and 'no deaths'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Pretzsch
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dionysios Koliogiannis
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Gustav D’Haese
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Ilmer
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Otto Guba
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Konrad Angele
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hanno Niess
- Correspondence to: Hanno Niess, Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Assessment of Factors Associated with Morbidity and Textbook Outcomes of Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Obese Patients: A French Nationwide Study. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 235:159-171. [PMID: 35675176 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver surgeons need to know the expected outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in obese patients. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the present study is to assess morbidity, mortality and textbook outcomes (TO) after LLR in obese patients. METHODS This is a French multicenter study of patients undergoing LLR between 1996 and 2018. Obesity was defined by a BMI at or above 30 kg/m 2 . Short-term outcomes and TO were compared between obese (ob) and nonobese (non-ob) patients. Factors associated with severe morbidity and TO were investigated. RESULTS Of 3,154 patients included, 616 (19.5%) were obese. Ob-group patients had significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and higher incidence of metabolic syndrome and chronic liver disease and were less likely to undergo major hepatectomy. Mortality rates were similar between ob and non-ob groups (0.8 vs 1.1%; p = 0.66). Overall morbidity and hospital stay were significantly increased in the ob group compared with the non-ob group (39.4 vs 34.7%, p = 0.03; and 9.5 vs 8.6 days, p = 0.02), whereas severe 90-day morbidity (at or above Clavien-Dindo grade III) was similar between groups (8% in both groups; p = 0.90). TO rate was significantly lower for the ob group than the non-ob group (58.3 vs 63.7%; p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, obesity did not emerge as a risk factor for severe 90-day morbidity but was associated with a lower TO rate after LLR (odds ratio = 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-1.0; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS LLR in obese patients is safe and effective with acceptable mortality and morbidity. Obesity had no impact on severe morbidity but was a factor for failing to achieve TO after LLR.
Collapse
|
21
|
Assessment of Textbook Oncologic Outcomes Following Modified Radical Mastectomy for Breast Cancer. J Surg Res 2022; 277:17-26. [PMID: 35453053 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) is a composite outcome measure attained when all desired short-term quality metrics are met following an oncologic operation. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of TOO and its impact on the overall survival (OS) among patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) following modified radical mastectomy (MRM). METHODS The 2004-2017 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with non-metastatic IDC who underwent MRM. TOO was defined as having attained five metrics: resection with negative microscopic margins, American Joint Committee on Cancer compliant lymph node evaluation (n ≥ 10), no prolonged length of stay (50th percentile by year), no 30-d readmission, and no 30-d mortality. OS was defined as the time in months between the date of diagnosis and the date of death or last contact. RESULTS A total of 75,063 patients were identified, of which 40.8% achieved TOO. The TOO patients had a lower median age and were more likely to be White, privately insured, and without comorbidities. In terms of facility characteristics, patients with TOO were more likely to be seen in comprehensive community cancer programs with a high case-volume per year. The TOO group had a statistically significant higher median OS compared to the non-TOO group (165.6 versus 142.2 mo; P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis TOO was independently associated with a reduced risk of death (HR = 0.82; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS TOO is achieved in approximately 41% of patients undergoing MRM for IDC. Achieving TOO is associated with improved median OS and reduced risk of death. TOO therefore merits further attention in efforts to improve surgical outcomes.
Collapse
|
22
|
D'Silva M, Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Lee HW, Lee JS, Lee B, Kim M, Jo Y. Association between achieving textbook outcomes and better survival after laparoscopic liver resection in the anterolateral segments in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2022; 29:855-862. [PMID: 35389551 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The quality of surgical procedures are assessed by textbook outcomes (TO). LLR is considered a standard treatment for HCC in the anterolateral segments of the liver. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting achievement of TO for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and its impact on survival. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent LLR for lesions located in the anterolateral segments (n=309). Patients were divided into TO and non-TO group. RESULTS A TO was achieved in 55.0% of patients (n=170). In multivariable analysis, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score >10 (odds ratio[OR] 3.076; 95% confidence interval[CI] 1.134-8.342), absence of diabetes mellitus (OR 2.325; 95% CI 1.227-4.407) and thrombocytopenia (OR 2.115; 95% CI 1.134-8.342) were independently associated with not achieving TO. The 5-year overall (82.9% vs. 72.8%, P=0.017) and recurrence-free (48.8% vs. 35.4%; P=0.036) survival rates were significantly greater in the TO group than in the non-TO group. CONCLUSION The MELD score, thrombocytopenia, and hypoalbuminemia were independent risk factors influencing the achievement of TO. TO influences the short- and long-term outcomes after LLR for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mizelle D'Silva
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, 15, Peddar Road, IT Colony, Tardeo, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.,Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Suh Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Boram Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Moonhwan Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeongsoo Jo
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cucchetti A, Aldrighetti L, Ratti F, Ferrero A, Guglielmi A, Giuliante F, Cillo U, Mazzaferro V, De Carlis L, Ercolani G. Variations in risk-adjusted outcomes following 4318 laparoscopic liver resections. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2022; 29:521-530. [PMID: 35305075 PMCID: PMC9324820 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background/Purpose Quality measures in surgery are important to establish appropriate levels of care and to develop improvement strategies. The purpose of this study was to provide risk‐adjusted outcome measures after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Methods Data from a prospective, multicenter database involving 4318 patients submitted to LLRs in 41 hospitals from an intention‐to‐treat approach (2014–2020) were used to analyze heterogeneity (I2) among centers and to develop a risk‐adjustment model on outcome measures through multivariable mixed‐effect models to account for confounding due to case‐mix. Results Involved hospitals operated on very different patients: the largest heterogeneity was observed for operating in the presence of previous abdominal surgery (I2:79.1%), in cirrhotic patients (I2:89.3%) suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma (I2:88.6%) or requiring associated intestinal resections (I2:82.8%) and in regard to technical complexity (I2 for the most complex LLRs: 84.1%). These aspects determined substantial or large heterogeneity in overall morbidity (I2:84.9%), in prolonged in‐hospital stay (I2:86.9%) and in conversion rate (I2:73.4%). Major complication had medium heterogeneity (I2:46.5%). The heterogeneity of mortality was null. Risk‐adjustment accounted for all of this variability and the final risk‐standardized conversion rate was 8.9%, overall morbidity was 22.1%, major morbidity was 5.1% and prolonged in‐hospital stay was 26.0%. There were no outliers among the 41 participating centers. An online tool was provided. Conclusions A benchmark for LLRs including all eligible patients was provided, suggesting that surgeons can act accordingly in the interest of the patient, modifying their approach in relation to different indications and different experience, but finally providing the same quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical sciences – DIMEC; Alma Mater StudiorumUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
- MorgagniPierantoni HospitalForlìItaly
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery DivisionDepartment of Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, School of MedicineMilanItaly
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery DivisionDepartment of Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, School of MedicineMilanItaly
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological SurgeryMauriziano HospitalTurinItaly
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryG. B. Rossi Hospital, University of VeronaVeronaItaly
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Unit of Hepato‐Biliary SurgeryFoundation 'Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli', Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and GastroenterologyUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver TransplantationUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and TransplantationNiguarda Ca' Granda HospitalMilanItaly
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- Department of Medical and Surgical sciences – DIMEC; Alma Mater StudiorumUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
- MorgagniPierantoni HospitalForlìItaly
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ramia JM, Soria-Aledo V. Textbook outcome: A new quality tool. Cir Esp 2022; 100:113-114. [PMID: 35216913 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2021.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jose M Ramia
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo. Hospital General Universitario de Alicante. ISABIAL. Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain.
| | - Victoriano Soria-Aledo
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo. Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer. Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria. Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Melgar P, Rodríguez-Laiz GP, Lluís N, Alcázar-López C, Franco-Campello M, Villodre C, Pascual S, Rodríguez-Soler M, Bellot P, Miralles C, Perdiguero M, Díaz M, Mas-Serrano P, Zapater P, Ramia JM, Lluís F. Textbook outcome among patients undergoing enhanced recovery after liver transplantation stratified by risk. A single-center retrospective observational cohort study. Int J Surg 2022; 99:106266. [PMID: 35182809 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 01/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Liver transplantation (LT) is one of the most complex surgical procedures. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) aims to reduce the risk of postoperative complications. When patients achieve all desirable outcomes after a procedure, they are considered to have experienced a textbook outcome (TO). METHODS Two cohorts of patients undergoing low (n = 101) or medium risk (n = 15) LT were identified. The remaining patients (n = 65) were grouped separately. The ERAS protocol included pre-, intra-, and post-operative steps. TO was defined as the absence of complications, prolonged length of hospital stays, readmission and mortality during the first 90 days. RESULTS One third of patients who underwent ERAS after LT experienced a TO. On multivariable analysis, age (OR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01-1.09]; P = .02), and having hepatocellular carcinoma (OR, 2.83 [95% CI, 1.37-6.03]; P = .005) were individually associated with a greater probability of achieving a TO. Belonging to the cohorts of medium risk or outside the selection criteria was associated with a lower probability of achieving a TO (OR, 0.46 [96% CI, 0.22-0.93]; P = .03). Patients less likely to experience TO required more hospital resources. Patients who achieved TO were more likely to remain free of chronic kidney disease (achieved TO, 83.8% [82.7-85.6]; failed TO, 67.9% [66.9-70.2]; P < .05). Tacrolimus dose and trough levels were similar. CONCLUSIONS A novel finding of our study is that short and medium-term kidney function is better preserved in patients who experience a TO. Better kidney function of patients who achieve TO is not due to lower tacrolimus dosage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Melgar
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, General University Hospital of Alicante (HGUA), and Health and Biomedical Research Institute of Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA Gastroenterology and Hepatology, General University Hospital of Alicante (HGUA), and Health and Biomedical Research Institute of Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain Nephrology, General University Hospital of Alicante (HGUA), and Health and Biomedical Research Institut of Alicant (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain Pharmacy and Pharmacokinetics, General University Hospital of Alicante (HGUA), and Health and Biomedical Research Institute of Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain Clinical Pharmacology, General University Hospital of Alicante (HGUA), and Health and Biomedical Research Institute of Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Achievement of textbook outcomes and comparisons with benchmark values after laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy. Updates Surg 2022; 74:1299-1306. [PMID: 35025070 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01237-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) is considered a standard approach for patients. Textbook outcomes (TOs) with benchmark values have been developed to help centers assess their outcomes of LLLS. The aim of our study was to identify factors associated with achieving TOs after LLLS. This is a retrospective cohort study including 195 patients undergoing LLLS between January 2004 and December 2018. Our outcomes were compared to benchmark values and graded as similar, better, or worse. A TO was achieved in 106 patients (54.4%). The main determinant for achieving a TO was prolonged hospital stay. Year of surgery [P = 0.002; odds ratio (OR) 3.913, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.666-9.188], American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (P = 0.015; OR 0.104, 95% CI 0.017-0.650), body mass index (BMI) score (P = 0.075; OR 1.135, 95% CI 0.988-1.304), inflow clamping > 40 min (P = 0.037; OR 0.090, 95% CI 0.009-0.867) and operation time (P = 0.002; OR 0.991, 95% CI 0.985-0.997) were the factors associated with achieving a TO. Our outcomes were similar to the benchmark values for all criteria, except for the transfusion rate (our study vs benchmark values; 6.2% vs 3.8%), which was worse in our patients. We achieved better outcomes with a lower conversion rate (4.6% vs 7.2%), fewer patients requiring massive transfusion (4.1% vs 8.3%), lower rate of prolonged inflow clamping (3.9% vs 6.3%), lower overall complication rate (11.9% vs 19.8%), lower reoperation rate (0% vs 3.4%), and fewer patients with a positive margin (1.5% vs 10.8%). Year of surgery, ASA score, inflow clamping > 40 min and operation time were independently associated with failure to achieve a TO. TOs are useful tools to measure the surgical outcomes and compare surgical performance with benchmark values. TOs also offer a new method to retrospectively compare outcomes.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ruzzenente A, Poletto E, Conci S, Campagnaro T, Valle BD, De Bellis M, Guglielmi A. Factors Related to Textbook Outcome in Laparoscopic Liver Resections: a Single Western Centre Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:2301-2310. [PMID: 35962214 PMCID: PMC9643260 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05413-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The selection of the most informative quality of care indicator for laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS) is still debated; among those proposed, textbook outcome (TO) seems to provide a compositive measure of the outcomes of surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors related with the TO in a cohort of patients who underwent LLS. METHODS Patients who underwent LLS from 2014 to 2021 were included. TO for LLS (TOLLS) was defined as: R0 resection, absence of intraoperative incidents, severe complications, reintervention, 30-day readmission and in-hospital mortality. When also considering no prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS), the outcome was called TOLLS+. RESULTS Four hundred twenty-one patients were included; TOLLS was achieved in 80.5%, TOLLS+ in 60.8% cases. R0 resection was obtained in 90.2% cases, intraoperative incidents occurred in 7.8%, severe complications in 5.0%, reintervention in 0.7%, readmission in 1.4% and in-hospital mortality in 0.2%. 32.5% of patients showed prolonged LOS. After univariate and multivariate analysis, factors influencing TOLLS were age (OR 0.967; p=0.003), concomitant surgery (OR 0.380; p=0.003), operative time (OR 0.996; p=0.008) and blood loss (OR 0.241; p<0.001); factors influencing TOLLS+ were ASA-score (OR 0.533; p=0.008), tumour histology (OR 0.421; p=0.021), concomitant surgery (OR 0.293; p<0.001), operative time (OR 0.997; p=0.016) and blood loss (OR 0.361; p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS TOLLS can be achieved in most patients undergoing LLR, and it seems to be influenced mostly by surgery-related factors; conversely, TOLLS+ is achieved less frequently and seems to be influenced also by patient- and tumour-related factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ruzzenente
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy.
| | - Edoardo Poletto
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Simone Conci
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Tommaso Campagnaro
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Bernardo Dalla Valle
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Mario De Bellis
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Aquina CT, Hamad A, Becerra AZ, Cloyd JM, Tsung A, Pawlik TM, Ejaz A. Is Textbook Oncologic Outcome a Valid Hospital-Quality Metric after High-Risk Surgical Oncology Procedures? Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8028-8045. [PMID: 34392460 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10478-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND "Textbook oncologic outcome" (TOO) is a composite quality measure representing the "ideal" outcome for patients undergoing cancer surgery. This study sought to assess the validity of TOO as a metric to evaluate hospital quality. METHODS Patients who underwent curative-intent resection of gastric, pancreatic, colon, rectal, lung, esophageal, bladder, or ovarian cancer were identified in the National Cancer Database (2006-2017). Cancer site-specific TOO was defined as adequate lymph node yield, R0 resection, non-length-of-stay outlier, no hospital readmission, and receipt of guideline-concordant chemotherapy and/or radiation. Mixed-effects analyses estimated the adjusted TOO rate for each hospital stratified by cancer site. The association between hospital adjusted TOO rates and 5-year overall survival was assessed using mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS Among 852,988 cancer resections, the TOO rate varied across cancer sites as follows: stomach (31.8%), pancreas (25%), colon (66.9%), rectum (33.6%), lung (35.1%), esophagus (31.2%), bladder (43%), and ovary (44.7%). After characterization of adjusted hospital TOO rates into quintiles, an incremental improvement in overall survival was observed, with higher adjusted TOO rates. Similarly, with the adjusted hospital TOO rate treated as a continuous variable, there was a significant 4% to 12% improvement in overall survival for every 10% increase in the adjusted hospital TOO rate for gastric (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.91), pancreatic (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93), colon (0.93; 95% CI, 0.91-0.94), rectal (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.93), lung (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.97), esophageal (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.95), bladder (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.97), and ovarian (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98) cancer. CONCLUSIONS A direct association exists between adjusted hospital TOO rates and survival after high-risk cancer procedures. As a valid hospital metric, TOO can be used to compare the overall quality of cancer care across hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher T Aquina
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Ahmad Hamad
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Adan Z Becerra
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Allan Tsung
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hobeika C, Cauchy F, Fuks D, Barbier L, Fabre JM, Boleslawski E, Regimbeau JM, Farges O, Pruvot FR, Pessaux P, Salamé E, Soubrane O, Vibert E, Scatton O. Laparoscopic versus open resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: nationwide analysis. Br J Surg 2021; 108:419-426. [PMID: 33793726 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relevance of laparoscopic resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains debated. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic (LLR) and open (OLR) liver resection for ICC, with specific focus on textbook outcome and lymph node dissection (LND). METHODS Patients undergoing LLR or OLR for ICC were included from two French, nationwide hepatopancreatobiliary surveys undertaken between 2000 and 2017. Patients with negative margins, and without transfusion, severe complications, prolonged hospital stay, readmission or death were considered to have a textbook outcome. Patients who achieved both a textbook outcome and LND were deemed to have an adjusted textbook outcome. OLR and LLR were compared after propensity score matching. RESULTS In total, 548 patients with ICC (127 LLR, 421 OLR) were included. Textbook-outcome and LND completion rates were 22.1 and 48.2 per cent respectively. LLR was independently associated with a decreased rate of LND (odds ratio 0.37, 95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.69). After matching, 109 patients remained in each group. LLR was associated with a decreased rate of transfusion (7.3 versus 21.1 per cent; P = 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (median 7 versus 14 days; P = 0.001), but lower rate of LND (33.9 versus 73.4 per cent; P = 0.001). Patients who underwent LLR had lower rate of adjusted TO completion than patients who had OLR (6.5 versus 17.4 per cent; P = 0.012). CONCLUSION The laparoscopic approach did not substantially improve quality of care of patients with resectable ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Hobeika
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.,Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris and Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - F Cauchy
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - D Fuks
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris V, Paris, France
| | - L Barbier
- Department of Digestive, Endocrine, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Trousseau, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Tours, Tours, France
| | - J M Fabre
- Department of Digestive, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - E Boleslawski
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Université Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - J M Regimbeau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - O Farges
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - F R Pruvot
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Université Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - P Pessaux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - E Salamé
- Department of Digestive, Endocrine, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Trousseau, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Tours, Tours, France
| | - O Soubrane
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - E Vibert
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris and Université Paris XI, Paris, France
| | - O Scatton
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris and Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ramia JM, Soria-Aledo V. Textbook outcome: A new quality tool. Cir Esp 2021; 100:S0009-739X(21)00215-3. [PMID: 34243935 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jose M Ramia
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo. Hospital General Universitario de Alicante. ISABIAL. Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, España.
| | - Victoriano Soria-Aledo
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo. Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer. Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria. Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, España
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hobeika C, Tribillon E, Marchese U, Faermark N, Ghedira A, Bonnet S, Nassar A, Gayet B, Fuks D. Validation of the IMM classification in laparoscopic repeat liver resections for colorectal liver metastases. Surgery 2021; 170:1448-1456. [PMID: 34176600 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To validate the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification as a difficulty scoring system applicable to laparoscopic repeat liver resections and identify risk-factors of unexpected difficulty. METHODS From a prospectively collected database between 2000 and 2019, patients undergoing laparoscopic repeat liver resections were classified according to the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification. Doubly robust estimators (weighted regressions) were used to assess the effect of factors on intra- and postoperative outcomes and allowed for strong adjustment on age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists, carcinoembryonic antigen, number, and size of lesions. Unexpected difficulty was defined as a composite indicator which included substantial blood loss and/or substantial operative time and/or conversion. RESULTS Of 205 laparoscopic repeat liver resections patients, 87, 25, and 93 procedures were classified as grade 1, 2, and 3 laparoscopic repeat liver resections, respectively. After doubly robust adjustment, the IMM classification was associated with blood loss (Cohen f2 0.12; P = 0.001), operative time (Cohen f2 0.07; P = .001), and length of stay (Cohen f2 0.13; P = .001), as well as with the risk of both minor and severe complications (odd ratio = 2.94; 95% confidence interval: 2.06-4.20) and the chances of achieving textbook outcome (relative risk = 0.57; 95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.81). Independently from the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification, a first major hepatectomy (relative risk = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.29) as well as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (relative risk = 1.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-1.41) were independent risk factors of unexpected difficulty. A first major resection was associated with decreased chances of textbook outcome (relative risk = 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.85). CONCLUSION The Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification is a valuable difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic repeat liver resections procedures, while previous major resection and presence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome are likely to jeopardize the outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Hobeika
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic, and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Ecoline Tribillon
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic, and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Ugo Marchese
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic, and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Nicole Faermark
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic, and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Abdessalem Ghedira
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic, and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Bonnet
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic, and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Nassar
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic, and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Brice Gayet
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic, and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic, and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nassar A, Tribillon E, Marchese U, Faermark N, Bonnet S, Beaussier M, Gayet B, Fuks D. Feasibility and outcomes of multiple simultaneous laparoscopic liver resections. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:2466-2472. [PMID: 33966122 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08531-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgeons often remain reluctant to consider laparoscopic approach in multiple liver tumors. This study assessed feasibility and short-term results of patients who had more than 3 simultaneous laparoscopic liver resections (LLR). METHODS All consecutive patients who underwent LLR for primary or secondary malignancies between 2009 and 2019 were analyzed. After exclusion of major LLR, patients were divided into three groups: less than three (Group A), between three and five (Group B), and more than five resections (Group C) in the same procedure. Intraoperative details, postoperative outcomes, and textbook outcome (TO) were compared in the 3 groups. RESULTS During study period, 463 patients underwent minor LLR. Among them, 412 (88.9%) had less than 3 resections, 38 (8.2%) between 3 and 5 resections, and 13 (2.8%) more than 5 resections. Despite a difficulty score according to IMM classification comparable in the 3 groups (with high difficulty grade 3 procedures of 16.5% vs. 15.7% vs. 23.1% in Group A, B, and C, respectively, p = 0.124), mean operative time was significantly longer in Group C (p = 0.039). Blood loss amount (p = 0.396) and conversion rate (p = 0.888) were similar in the 3 groups. Rate of R1 margins was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.078). Achievement of TO was not different between groups (p = 0.741). In multivariate analysis, non-achievement of TO was associated with difficulty according to IMM classification (OR = 2.29 (1.33-3.98)). CONCLUSION Since intra- and post-operative outcomes and quality of resection are comparable, multiple liver resections should not preclude the laparoscopic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Nassar
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France.
| | - Ecoline Tribillon
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Ugo Marchese
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Nicole Faermark
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Bonnet
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Marc Beaussier
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Brice Gayet
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Russolillo N, Aldrighetti L, Guglielmi A, Giuliante F, Ferrero A. Correspondence on "Benchmark performance of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and right hepatectomy in expert centers". J Hepatol 2021; 74:985-986. [PMID: 33340571 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery. Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy.
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Unit of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery. Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hobeika C, Fuks D. Reply to: "Letter regarding Benchmark performance of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and right hepatectomy in expert centers". J Hepatol 2021; 74:987-988. [PMID: 33493528 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Hobeika
- Department of HPB surgery and Liver transplantation, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, University Paris Descartes, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hobeika C, Nault JC, Barbier L, Schwarz L, Lim C, Laurent A, Gay S, Salamé E, Scatton O, Soubrane O, Cauchy F. Influence of surgical approach and quality of resection on the probability of cure for early-stage HCC occurring in cirrhosis. JHEP Rep 2020; 2:100153. [PMID: 32995713 PMCID: PMC7502347 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The quality of surgical care of patients with HCC is associated with improved long-term prognosis and may also be influenced by the type of surgical approach. The present study aimed at evaluating the role of the laparoscopic approach on quality of surgical care and long-term prognosis in optimal HCC surgical candidates. METHODS All consecutive patients undergoing open (OLR) or laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for early-stage HCC in cirrhosis (METAVIR F4) at 5 French expert hepato-pancreatico-biliary centres between 2010 and 2018 were enrolled. Quality of surgical care was defined by textbook outcome (TO), a combination of 6 criteria representing ideal hospitalisation. Factors associated with TO were determined on multivariate analysis. Comparison between LLR and OLR was performed after propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Statistical cure was modelled using a non-mixture model. RESULTS Overall, 425 patients were included. Median follow-up was 42.0 months. LLR was performed in 267 (62.8%) patients. TO was achieved in 140 (32.9%) patients. LLR was independently associated with TO (odds ratio [OR] 2.81; 95% CI 1.29-6.12; p = 0.009). After PSM, LLR patients cumulated higher number of TO criteria than OLR patients (5 vs. 4; p = 0.012). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS of LLR patients with and without TO were 82.3%, 64.4%, and 62.5%, and 76.9%, 51.4%, and 30.2%, respectively (p = 0.003). On multivariable Cox regression, TO was independently associated with improved DFS (hazard ratio 0.34; p = 0.001). The cure fraction of the whole population was 24.4%. Patients achieving TO had increased cure fraction than patients not achieving TO (32.6% vs. 18.1%). CONCLUSIONS Quality of surgical care improves the prognosis of patients with early-stage HCC and is promoted by the laparoscopic approach. LAY SUMMARY The overall quality of surgical care, as measured by TO, plays a pivotal role in the prognosis and, in particular, on the probability of statistical cure of patients with resectable early-stage HCC occurring in cirrhosis. By influencing TO, laparoscopy has an indirect impact on the probability of cure and long-term management of these patients. This study strongly supports the promising curative role of mini-invasive treatments for early-stage HCC, such as low-difficulty LLR.
Collapse
Key Words
- AFP, alpha-fetoprotein
- ALBI, albumin-bilirubin
- CCI, Comprehensive Complication Index
- CT, computed tomography
- DFS, disease-free survival
- HPB, hepato-pancreatico-biliary
- HR, hazard ratio
- Hepatocellular carcinoma
- IMM, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
- ISGLS, International Study Group of Liver Surgery
- LLR, laparoscopic liver resection
- LOS, length of stay
- LR, liver resection
- Laparoscopic liver resection
- MELD, model for end-stage liver disease
- OLR, open liver resection
- OR, odds ratio
- OS, overall survival
- PHLF, post-hepatectomy liver failure
- Quality of care
- Statistical cure
- TO, textbook outcome
- Textbook outcome
- VIF, variance inflation factor
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Hobeika
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jean Charles Nault
- Liver Unit, Jean Verdier Hospital, Bondy, France
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-XIII, Paris, France
- Unité de Formation et de Recherche Santé Médecine et Biologie Humaine, Université Paris-XIII, Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris, INSERM UMR 1148 Functional Genomics of Solid Tumors laboratory, F-75006, Paris, France
| | - Louise Barbier
- Department of Digestive, Endocrine, HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Trousseau University Hospital, Tours, France
- INSERM U1082, Poitiers, France
| | - Lilian Schwarz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Chetana Lim
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Est Creteil, Paris, France
| | - Suzanne Gay
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Ephrem Salamé
- Department of Digestive, Endocrine, HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Trousseau University Hospital, Tours, France
- INSERM U1082, Poitiers, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
- Centre de Recherche Sur l'Inflammation, Inserm, Université de Paris, INSERM UMR 1149 De l'Inflammation au Cancer Laboratory, Paris, France
| | - François Cauchy
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
- Centre de Recherche Sur l'Inflammation, Inserm, Université de Paris, INSERM UMR 1149 De l'Inflammation au Cancer Laboratory, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|