1
|
Sharma D, Khosla D, Meena BL, Yadav HP, Kapoor R. Exploring the Evolving Landscape of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2025; 15:102386. [PMID: 39282593 PMCID: PMC11399579 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries significant morbidity and mortality. Management of the HCC requires a multidisciplinary approach. Surgical resection and liver transplantation are the gold standard options for the appropriate settings. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising treatment modality in managing HCC; its use is more studied and well-established in advanced HCC (aHCC). Current clinical guidelines universally endorse SBRT as a viable alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), and transarterial radioembolisation (TARE), a recommendation substantiated by literature demonstrating comparable efficacy among these modalities. In early-stage HCC, SBRT primarily manages unresectable tumours unsuitable for ablative procedures such as microwave ablation and RFA. SBRT has been incorporated as a modality to downstage tumours or as a bridge to transplant. In the case of intermediate or advanced HCC, SBRT offers excellent results either as a single modality or adjunct to other locoregional modalities such as TACE/TARE. Recent data from late-stage HCC patients illustrate the effectiveness of SBRT in achieving local tumour control while minimising damage to surrounding healthy liver tissue. It has promising local control of approximately 80-90% in managing HCC. Additional prospective data comparing the efficacy of SBRT with the first-line recommended therapies such as RFA, TACE, and surgery are essential. The standard of care for patients with advanced/metastatic disease is systemic therapy (immunotherapy/tyrosine kinase inhibitors). SBRT, in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors, has an immune-modulatory effect that results in a synergistic effect. Recent findings indicate that the combination of immunotherapy and SBRT in HCC is well-tolerated and exhibits synergistic effects. Further exploration of diverse immunotherapy and radiotherapy strategies is essential to identify the appropriate time for combination treatments and to optimise dose and fraction regimens. Prospective, randomised studies are imperative to establish SBRT as the primary treatment for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepti Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Divya Khosla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Babu L Meena
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Hanuman P Yadav
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rakesh Kapoor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang Z, Liu S, Hu L, Chen J, Wang J, Pan Y, Xu L, Liu M, Chen M, Xi M, Zhang Y. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is an alternative to radiofrequency ablation for single HCC ≤5.0 cm. JHEP Rep 2024; 6:101151. [PMID: 39308987 PMCID: PMC11416668 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims Radiation therapy has been refined with increasing evidence of the benefits of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether SBRT could serve as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small HCC with a single lesion ≤5.0 cm. Methods Patients with a single HCC lesion ≤5.0 cm who received RFA or SBRT were included. Cumulative local/distant recurrence rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse events and subsequent treatments after recurrence were analyzed. Results A total of 288 patients receiving RFA (n = 166) or SBRT (n = 122) were enrolled. The baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The cumulative local recurrence rate in the SBRT group was significantly lower than that in the RFA group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.16-0.57, p <0.001), especially for patients with tumours >2.0 cm (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.50, p <0.001) or adjacent to major vessels (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.66, p <0.001). Cumulative distant recurrence rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between the two groups (all p >0.050). Adverse events were mild and easily reversible. However, more patients in the SBRT group suffered from Child-Pugh score and total bilirubin increases. More treatment options after recurrence or progression might be available for patients in the RFA group compared to those in the SBRT group (p <0.001). Conclusions Both RFA and SBRT were effective and safe for HCC with a single lesion ≤5.0 cm. SBRT could be an alternative treatment to RFA, especially for tumours >2.0 cm or adjacent to major vessels. Impact and implications Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may be used as an alternative treatment to thermal ablation for patients with BCLC stage A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not candidates for surgical resection, including those with tumours >3 cm and those with 1 to 3 tumours. This study focused on HCC patients with a specific tumour burden, namely a single lesion ≤5.0 cm, demonstrating that SBRT could be an effective and safe alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), especially for those with tumours >2.0 cm or adjacent to major vessels. The findings of this study provided robust empirical evidence supporting the utilization of SBRT in treating small HCC, while also establishing a solid foundation for future prospective clinical investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhoutian Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, P. R. China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China
| | - Shiliang Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, P. R. China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China
| | - Li Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, P. R. China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China
| | - Jinbin Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, P. R. China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China
| | - Juncheng Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, P. R. China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China
| | - Yangxun Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, P. R. China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China
| | - Li Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, P. R. China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China
| | - Mengzhong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, P. R. China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China
| | - Minshan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, P. R. China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China
| | - Mian Xi
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, P. R. China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China
| | - Yaojun Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, P. R. China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bae SH, Jang WI, Mortensen HR, Weber B, Kim MS, Høyer M. Recent update of proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF LIVER CANCER 2024; 24:286-302. [PMID: 38961722 PMCID: PMC11449586 DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2024.06.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS Although access to proton beam therapy (PBT) is limited worldwide, its use for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is gradually increasing with the expansion of new facilities. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis to investigate the updated evidence of PBT for HCC. METHODS The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies that enrolled patients with liver-confined HCC that were treated with PBT for a cure up to February 2024. RESULTS A total of 1,858 HCC patients receiving PBT from 22 studies between 2004 and 2023 were selected for this meta-analysis. The median proportion of Child-Pugh class A was 86% (range, 41-100), and the median tumor size was 3.6 cm (range, 1.2-9.0). The median total dose ranged from 55 GyE to 76 GyE (median, 69). The pooled rates of 3- and 5-year local progression-free survival after PBT were 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85-91) and 86% (95% CI, 82-90), respectively. The pooled 3- and 5-year overall rates were 60% (95% CI, 54-66) and 46% (95% CI, 38-54), respectively. The pooled rates of grade 3 hepatic toxicity, classic radiationinduced liver disease (RILD), and non-classic RILD were 1%, 2%, and 1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The current study supports PBT for HCC and demonstrates favorable long-term survival and low hepatic toxicities compared with other published studies on other radiotherapy modalities. However, further studies are needed to identify the subgroups that will benefit from PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Hyun Bae
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Bucheon, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Won Il Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Britta Weber
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mi Sook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Morten Høyer
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hogen R, Barry T, Subramanian V. Expanding Indications for Liver Transplantation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:4753-4761. [PMID: 39195338 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31080355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2024] [Revised: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Improvements in downstaging therapies have expanded the indications for liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients with more advanced disease are now considered candidates due to advancements in radiation therapy, combination therapies, and immunotherapy. Combination stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been shown to be superior to the historic treatment, sorafenib, in patients with macrovascular invasion. These patients are now candidates for LT with stable disease after LRT. Patients with ruptured HCC and prolonged stability have also been shown to have acceptable outcomes. The role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy needs to be further defined and has the potential to further improve tumor control prior to transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Hogen
- Transplant Institute, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL 33606, USA
| | - Tara Barry
- Transplant Institute, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL 33606, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wigg A, Tibballs J, Woodman R, Stuart K, Le H, Roberts SK, Olynyk JK, Strasser SI, Wallace M, Martin J, Haworth A, Hardcastle N, Loo KF, Tang C, Lee YY, Chu J, De Abreu Lourenco R, Koukourou A, De Boo D, McLean K, Buck J, Sawhney R, Nicoll A, Dev A, Wood M, Braund A, Weltman M, Khor R, Levy M, Wang T, Potter M, Haridy J, Raj A, Duncan O, Zekry A, Collier N, O'Beirne J, Holliday C, Trada Y, Tronidjaja J, George J, Pryor D. A randomised controlled trial of Standard Of Care versus RadioAblaTion in Early Stage HepatoCellular Carcinoma (SOCRATES HCC). BMC Cancer 2024; 24:813. [PMID: 38973009 PMCID: PMC11229272 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12504-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Therapeutic options for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in individual patients can be limited by tumor and location, liver dysfunction and comorbidities. Many patients with early-stage HCC do not receive curative-intent therapies. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as an effective, non-invasive HCC treatment option, however, randomized evidence for SABR in the first line setting is lacking. METHODS Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) 21.07 SOCRATES-HCC is a phase II, prospective, randomised trial comparing SABR to other current standard of care therapies for patients with a solitary HCC ≤ 8 cm, ineligible for surgical resection or transplantation. The study is divided into 2 cohorts. Cohort 1 will compromise 118 patients with tumors ≤ 3 cm eligible for thermal ablation randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to thermal ablation or SABR. Cohort 2 will comprise 100 patients with tumors > 3 cm up to 8 cm in size, or tumors ≤ 3 cm ineligible for thermal ablation, randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to SABR or best other standard of care therapy including transarterial therapies. The primary objective is to determine whether SABR results in superior freedom from local progression (FFLP) at 2 years compared to thermal ablation in cohort 1 and compared to best standard of care therapy in cohort 2. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival, overall survival, adverse events, patient reported outcomes and health economic analyses. DISCUSSION The SOCRATES-HCC study will provide the first randomized, multicentre evaluation of the efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of SABR versus other standard of care therapies in the first line treatment of unresectable, early-stage HCC. It is a broad, multicentre collaboration between hepatology, interventional radiology and radiation oncology groups around Australia, coordinated by TROG Cancer Research. TRIAL REGISTRATION anzctr.org.au, ACTRN12621001444875, registered 21 October 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Wigg
- Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.
- Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
| | | | | | | | - Hien Le
- Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
- University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | - Simone I Strasser
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kee Fong Loo
- Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Colin Tang
- Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Julie Chu
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Adam Koukourou
- Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Kate McLean
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jackie Buck
- Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group, Waratah, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Marnie Wood
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Alicia Braund
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Tim Wang
- Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Ashok Raj
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | - James O'Beirne
- Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Jacob George
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Pryor
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yadav S, Jiang F, Kurkowska S, Saelee R, Morley A, Feng F, Aggarwal R, Lawhn-Heath C, Uribe C, Hope TA. Assessing Response to PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapies with Single SPECT Imaging at 24 Hours After Injection. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1064-1069. [PMID: 38724282 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Understanding the relationship between lesion-absorbed dose and tumor response in 177Lu-PSMA-617 radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) remains complex. We aimed to investigate whether baseline lesion-absorbed dose can predict lesion-based responses and to explore the connection between lesion-absorbed dose and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 50 patients with 335 index lesions undergoing 177Lu-PSMA-617 RPT, who had dosimetry analysis performed on SPECT/CT at 24 h after cycles 1 and 2. First, we identified the index lesions for each patient and measured the lesion-based absorbed doses. Lesion-based response was calculated after cycle 2. Additionally, PSA50 response (a decline of 50% from baseline PSA) after cycle 2 was also calculated. The respective responses for mean and maximum absorbed doses and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) volumetric intensity product (VIP-PSMA) at cycles 1 and 2 were termed SPECTmean, SPECTmaximum, and SPECTVIP-PSMA, respectively. Results: Of the 50 patients reviewed, 46% achieved a PSA50 response after cycle 2. Of the 335 index lesions, 58% were osseous, 32% were lymph nodes, and 10% were soft-tissue metastatic lesions. The SPECT lesion-based responses were higher in PSA responders than in nonresponders (SPECTmean response of 46.8% ± 26.1% vs. 26.2% ± 24.5%, P = 0.007; SPECTmaximum response of 45% ± 25.1% vs. 19% ± 27.0%, P = 0.001; SPECTVIP-PSMA response of 49.2% ± 30.3% vs. 14% ± 34.7%, P = 0.0005). An association was observed between PSA response and SPECTVIP-PSMA response (R 2 = 0.40 and P < 0.0001). A limited relationship was found between baseline absorbed dose measured with a 24-h single time point and SPECT lesion-based response (R 2 = 0.05, P = 0.001, and R 2 = 0.03, P = 0.007, for mean and maximum absorbed doses, respectively). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, quantitative lesion-based response correlated with patient-level PSA response. We observed a limited relationship between baseline absorbed dose and lesion-based responses. Most of the variance in response remains unexplained solely by baseline absorbed dose. Establishment of a dose-response relationship in RPT with a single time point at 24 h presented some limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surekha Yadav
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Fei Jiang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Sara Kurkowska
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Rachelle Saelee
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Amanda Morley
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Felix Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Rahul Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Courtney Lawhn-Heath
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Carlos Uribe
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
- Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California; and
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guo JY, Zhao LL, Cai HJ, Zeng H, Mei WD. Radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for recurrent liver cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:1756-1764. [PMID: 38983320 PMCID: PMC11230010 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recurrence rate of liver cancer after surgery is high. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an effective treatment for liver cancer; however, its efficacy in recurrent liver cancer remains unclear. AIM To investigate the clinical effect of TACE combined with RFA in the treatment of recurrent liver cancer. METHODS Ninety patients with recurrent liver cancer were divided into 2 groups according to treatment plan: Control (RFA alone); and experimental [TACE combined with RFA (TACE + RFA)]. The incidence of increased alanine aminotransferase levels, complications, and other indices were compared between the two groups before and after the procedures. RESULTS One month after the procedures, the short-term efficacy rate and Karnofsky Performance Status scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and total bilirubin levels were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05); The overall response rate was 82.22% and 66.67% in the experimental and control groups, respectively; The disease control rate was 93.33% and 82.22% in the experimental and control groups, respectively, the differences are statistically significant (P < 0.05). And there were no statistical differences in complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION TACE + RFA was effective for the treatment of recurrent liver cancer and significantly reduced AFP levels and improved various indices of liver function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-You Guo
- Department of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province Taizhou Yuhuan City, Taizhou 317605, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Li-Li Zhao
- Department of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province Taizhou Yuhuan City, Taizhou 317605, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Hui-Jun Cai
- Department of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province Taizhou Yuhuan City, Taizhou 317605, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Hui Zeng
- Department of Interventional, China's Zhejiang Province Tumor Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Wei-Dong Mei
- Department of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province Taizhou Yuhuan City, Taizhou 317605, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xiao T, Hu S, Dong S, Cai Q, Gong W, Zhang Y, Long C, Li X. A study on combination of non-ablative local RFA with PD-1 and angiogenesis blocking to prolong survival through improvement of immune microenvironment in advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int Immunopharmacol 2024; 134:112144. [PMID: 38733820 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), an effective local treatment method for early-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), combined with PD-1 blocking and anti-angiogenic therapy is being extensively explored in advanced HCC, however, the definite results and underlying mechanisms still remain to be elucidated. Therefore, whether non-ablative RFA-based combined therapy can play a synergistic anti-tumor effect through improving tumor immune microenvironment was investigated by us in HCC mouse models. Our results showed that non-ablative RFA could regulate multilayered immunity, such as inducing immunogenic death of tumor cells, upregulating the secretion of inflammatory cytokines, mainly IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-10, and subsequently promoting the infiltration of CD8 + T cells. As a result, a significant synergistic anti-tumor effect was demonstrated in the combination therapy group. Similarly, in the real-world setting, non-curative RFA combined with PD-1 blocking and Lenvatinib for 12 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C achieve promising results, with 6.9 months (95 % CI: 3.23-15.73) median progression-free survival (mPFS) and 12.7 months (95 % CI: 7.40-19.73) median overall survival (mOS). The common treatment-related adverse reactions were pneumonia and thyroiditis with low prevalence, both less than grade 3 and manageable by symptomatic treatment. Summarily, local non-ablative RFA should be a clinically preferred strategy in combination with PD-1 blocking and anti-angiogenic therapy, because this more flexible scheme abandons its historical concept of tumor eradication, but fully utilizes the immune regulatory function by inducing immunogenic tumor death and has higher-level of safety. Therefore, this is a two-pronged and highly balanced approach to achieved favorable treatment outcomes, while conclusive evidence is still pending, it can be attempted in the real world anyway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianlin Xiao
- Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China
| | - Sheng Hu
- Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Shuang Dong
- Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Qian Cai
- Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei Gong
- Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China
| | - Yang Zhang
- Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China
| | - Cheng Long
- Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China
| | - Xiaoyu Li
- Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Naumann P, Hoffmeister-Wittmann P, Ben Harrabi S, Seidensaal K, Weykamp F, Mielke T, Ellerbrock M, Habermehl D, Springfeld C, Dill MT, Longerich T, Schirmacher P, Mehrabi A, Chang DH, Hörner-Rieber J, Jäkel O, Haberer T, Combs SE, Debus J, Herfarth K, Liermann J. Carbon ion radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma provides excellent local control: The prospective phase I PROMETHEUS trial. JHEP Rep 2024; 6:101063. [PMID: 38737600 PMCID: PMC11087711 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims Inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy. However, carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is more effective for sparing non-tumorous liver. High linear energy transfer could promote therapy efficacy. Japanese and Chinese studies on hypofractionated CIRT have yielded excellent results. Because of different radiobiological models and the different etiological spectrum of HCC, applicability of these results to European cohorts and centers remains questionable. The aim of this prospective study was to assess safety and efficacy and to determine the optimal dose of CIRT with active raster scanning based on the local effect model (LEM) I. Methods CIRT was performed every other day in four fractions with relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted fraction doses of 8.1-10.5 Gy (total doses 32.4-42.0 Gy [RBE]). Dose escalation was performed in five dose levels with at least three patients each. The primary endpoint was acute toxicity after 4 weeks. Results Twenty patients received CIRT (median age 74.7 years, n = 16 with liver cirrhosis, Child-Pugh scores [CP] A5 [n = 10], A6 [n = 4], B8 [n = 1], and B9 [n = 1]). Median follow up was 23 months. No dose-limiting toxicities and no toxicities exceeding grade II occurred, except one grade III gamma-glutamyltransferase elevation 12 months after CIRT, synchronous to out-of-field hepatic progression. During 12 months after CIRT, no CP elevation occurred. The highest dose level could be applied safely. No local recurrence developed during follow up. The objective response rate was 80%. Median overall survival was 30.8 months (1/2/3 years: 75%/64%/22%). Median progression-free survival was 20.9 months (1/2/3 years: 59%/43%/43%). Intrahepatic progression outside of the CIRT target volume was the most frequent pattern of progression. Conclusions CIRT of HCC yields excellent local control without dose-limiting toxicity. Impact and implications To date, safety and efficacy of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma have only been evaluated prospectively in Japanese and Chinese studies. The optimal dose and fractionation when using the local effect model for radiotherapy planning are unknown. The results are of particular interest for European and American particle therapy centers, but also of relevance for all specialists involved in the treatment and care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, as we present the first prospective data on carbon ion radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma outside of Asia. The excellent local control should encourage further use of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma and design of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Trials Registration The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01167374).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Naumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Xcare Praxis für Strahlentherapie, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Paula Hoffmeister-Wittmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Mielke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Malte Ellerbrock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Habermehl
- Wilhelm-Conrad-Röntgen-Klinik Gießen, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Gießen, Germany
| | - Christoph Springfeld
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael T. Dill
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases, Intoxication, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Experimental Hepatology, Inflammation and Cancer Research Group, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Longerich
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral & Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - De-Hua Chang
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li Z, Liu J, Zhang B, Yue J, Shi X, Cui K, Liu Z, Chang Z, Sun Z, Li M, Yang Y, Ma Z, Li L, Zhang C, Sun P, Zhong J, Zhao L. Neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus stereotactic body radiotherapy and adjuvant tislelizumab in early-stage resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the Notable-HCC phase 1b trial. Nat Commun 2024; 15:3260. [PMID: 38627377 PMCID: PMC11021407 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47420-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Notable-HCC (NCT05185531) is a phase 1b trial, aiming to evaluate the safety and preliminary effectiveness of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in early-stage resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Twenty patients with HCC of BCLC stage 0-A received 3 × Gy SBRT and two cycles of tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody before the curative HCC resection. Primary endpoints were the surgery delay, radiographic and pathological tumor response after the neoadjuvant therapy, safety and tolerability. During the neoadjuvant therapy, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade 1-2 occurred in all 20 patients (100%), eight patients (40%) had grade 3 TRAEs, no grade 4 to 5 TRAE occurred, and all resolved without corticosteroids treatment. Per mRECIST, the objective response rate was 63.2% (12/19), with 3 complete response; the disease control rate was 100%. Two (10.5%) patients achieved complete pathological response. No surgery delay occurred. The neoadjuvant therapy did not increase the surgical difficulty or the incidence of complications. Secondary endpoints of disease-free survival and overall survival were not mature at the time of the analysis. Our pilot trial shows that neoadjuvant therapy with anti-PD-1 + SBRT is safe and promotes tumor responses in early-stage resectable HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongchao Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Jing Liu
- Department of Abdominal Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Bo Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Jinbo Yue
- Department of Abdominal Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Xuetao Shi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Kai Cui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Zhaogang Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Zhibin Chang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 6699 Qingdao Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Zhicheng Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 6699 Qingdao Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Mingming Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 6699 Qingdao Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Yue Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 6699 Qingdao Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Zhao Ma
- The Fourth People's Hospital of Jinan, Jinan, China
| | - Lei Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Chengsheng Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Pengfei Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Jingtao Zhong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China
| | - Lei Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China.
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 6699 Qingdao Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, China.
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nong HY, Cen YY, Qin M, Qin WQ, Xie YX, Li L, Liu MR, Ding K. Application of texture signatures based on multiparameter-magnetic resonance imaging for predicting microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: Retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:1309-1318. [PMID: 38660663 PMCID: PMC11037072 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i4.1309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite continuous changes in treatment methods, the survival rate for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients remains low, highlighting the importance of diagnostic methods for HCC. AIM To explore the efficacy of texture analysis based on multi-parametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) in predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) in preoperative HCC. METHODS This study included 105 patients with pathologically confirmed HCC, categorized into MVI-positive and MVI-negative groups. We employed Original Data Analysis, Principal Component Analysis, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Non-LDA (NDA) for texture analysis using multi-parametric MR images to predict preoperative MVI. The effectiveness of texture analysis was determined using the B11 program of the MaZda4.6 software, with results expressed as the misjudgment rate (MCR). RESULTS Texture analysis using multi-parametric MRI, particularly the MI + PA + F dimensionality reduction method combined with NDA discrimination, demonstrated the most effective prediction of MVI in HCC. Prediction accuracy in the pulse and equilibrium phases was 83.81%. MCRs for the combination of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), arterial phase, portal venous phase, and equilibrium phase were 22.86%, 16.19%, 20.95%, and 20.95%, respectively. The area under the curve for predicting MVI positivity was 0.844, with a sensitivity of 77.19% and specificity of 91.67%. CONCLUSION Texture analysis of arterial phase images demonstrated superior predictive efficacy for MVI in HCC compared to T2WI, portal venous, and equilibrium phases. This study provides an objective, non-invasive method for preoperative prediction of MVI, offering a theoretical foundation for the selection of clinical therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Yang Nong
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530031, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise 533000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Yong-Yi Cen
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning 530031, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Mi Qin
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530031, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Wen-Qi Qin
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530031, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - You-Xiang Xie
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530031, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Lin Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530031, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Man-Rong Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530031, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Ke Ding
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530031, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim BH, Park HC, Kim TH, Koh YH, Hong JY, Cho Y, Sinn DH, Park B, Park JW. Concurrent nivolumab and external beam radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: A phase II study. JHEP Rep 2024; 6:100991. [PMID: 38463541 PMCID: PMC10920711 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Nivolumab was the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is locally effective and may enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of concurrent nivolumab and EBRT in HCC with macrovascular invasion. Methods In this phase II multicenter trial, patients with HCC and macrovascular invasion were concurrently treated with intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and EBRT, followed by maintenance nivolumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety, and secondary endpoints were overall survival, time-to-progression, objective response rate, and disease control rate. Results Between January 2020 and June 2021, 50 patients (male 84%, median age 62.5) were enrolled; 47 (94.0%) and 13 (26.0%) with portal (Vp1/2, n = 21; Vp3, n = 23; Vp4, n = 3) and hepatic vein invasion, respectively. Patients received EBRT (median dose: 50 [IQR 43-50] Gy) after the first nivolumab dose. The median number of nivolumab doses was 8.5. Median PFS was 5.6 (90% CI 3.6-9.9) months. Median overall survival and time-to-progression were 15.2 (90% CI 10.8-19.6) and 5.6 (90% CI 3.6-9.9) months, respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 36.0% and 74.0%, respectively. The median duration of response was 9.9 months. Of 35 patients with follow-up data, 23 received subsequent systemic treatment, including atezolizumab-bevacizumab, sorafenib, lenvatinib, and regorafenib. Treatment-related any grade adverse events (AEs) and grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 40 (80.0%) and 6 (12.0%) patients, respectively. Common treatment-related AEs included pruritus (38.0%) and rash (16.0%), with no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion Concurrent nivolumab therapy and EBRT showed encouraging PFS with acceptable safety in patients with advanced HCC and macrovascular invasion. Impact and implications Immune checkpoint inhibitors, the standard care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), show relatively poor therapeutic effects in patients with advanced HCC and macrovascular invasion. In this investigator-initiated phase II study, we, for the first time, show that concurrent external beam radiation therapy with nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, led to encouraging progression-free survival in patients with HCC and macrovascular invasion. The concurrent treatment was tolerable without significant safety concerns. Further randomized studies investigating the combination of immunotherapy and external beam radiation therapy are required. ClinicalTrialsgov identifier NCT04611165.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Hyun Kim
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Hwan Koh
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Yong Hong
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yuri Cho
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Hyun Sinn
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Boram Park
- Biomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joong-Won Park
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ning C, Zhang X, Wang Y, Yang X, Yang X, Chao J, Xun Z, Xue J, Wang Y, Sun H, Li Y, Zhang N, Zhu C, Hou X, Sang X, Zhao H. Radiation Therapy With Combination Therapy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Antiangiogenic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1461-1471. [PMID: 37433375 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with antiangiogenic therapy have limited efficacy in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The synergistic effect of systemic therapy and radiation therapy (RT) might resolve this problem. We aimed to investigate the effect of RT on the treatment outcomes of ICIs and antiangiogenic combination therapy in patients with advanced-stage HCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS This retrospective observational study analyzed the medical records of 194 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C HCC who were admitted to our center from August 2018 to June 2022 and received ICIs combined with antiangiogenic therapy as the first-line treatment. Patients who were administered RT for tumor thrombus or symptomatic metastases within 8 weeks of the commencement of combination therapy were allocated to the RT group, whereas those who did not receive RT were assigned to the non-radiation therapy (NRT) group. Propensity score matching was used to mitigate selection bias. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate (DCR), local PFS, out-of-field PFS, and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS A total of 76 patients diagnosed with advanced-stage HCC and treated with ICIs and antiangiogenic therapy were included in the study, with 33 patients in the RT group and 43 patients in the non-RT group. After propensity score matching, 29 matched patient pairs were generated. The median follow-up was 15.5 months, and the RT sites were mainly located on the tumor thrombus (55.2%) and extrahepatic metastatic lesions (48.3%). The median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.4-11.3) in the RT group and 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.4-5.0) in the NRT group (P < .001). The median OS was not reached in the RT group and was 9.7 months (95% CI, 4.1-15.3) in the NRT group (P = .002). The objective response rate was 75.9% (95% CI, 56.5-89.7) in the RT group and 24.1% (95% CI, 10.3-43.5) in the NRT group (P < .001). The DCR was 100% in the RT group and 75.9% (95% CI, 56.5-89.7) in the NRT group (P = .005). The median local PFS and out-of-field PFS were 13.2 months (95% CI, 6.3-20.1) and 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.0-14.7), respectively. RT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.64; P < .001) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.68; P = .005), respectively. The rates of any grade treatment-related adverse events were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS In comparison to the combination of ICIs and antiangiogenic therapy, the inclusion of RT has been observed to improve the DCR and survival outcomes in patients with advanced-stage HCC. The safety profile of this triple therapy was satisfactory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Ning
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China
| | - Xinmu Zhang
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China
| | - Yanyu Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China
| | - Xu Yang
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China
| | - Xiaobo Yang
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China
| | - Jiashuo Chao
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China
| | - Ziyu Xun
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China
| | - Jingnan Xue
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China
| | - Yunchao Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China
| | - Huishan Sun
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China
| | - Yiran Li
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China
| | - Nan Zhang
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China
| | - Chengpei Zhu
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China
| | - Xiaorong Hou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China.
| | - Xinting Sang
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China.
| | - Haitao Zhao
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Safavi AH, Dawson LA, Mesci A. Do We Have a Winner? Advocating for SBRT in HCC Management. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100740. [PMID: 38380116 PMCID: PMC10876598 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
•Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a safe and effective locoregional therapy for inoperable patients with HCC.•SBRT compares favorably with other local therapies in terms of local control, survival, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness.•SBRT should be considered and discussed in multidisciplinary management of appropriate HCC patients.•Advances in SBRT and novel combinations with systemic therapy may further widen the therapeutic index in HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir H. Safavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura A. Dawson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aruz Mesci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mizumoto M, Ogino H, Okumura T, Terashima K, Murakami M, Ogino T, Tamamura H, Akimoto T, Waki T, Katoh N, Araya M, Onoe T, Takagi M, Iwata H, Numajiri H, Okimoto T, Uchinami Y, Maruo K, Shibuya K, Sakurai H. Proton Beam Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Prospective Registry Study in Japan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:725-733. [PMID: 37778422 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A prospective multicenter registry study was started May 2016 in Japan to evaluate the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients who received PBT for HCC from May 2016 to June 2018 were registered in the database of the Particle Beam Therapy Committee and Subcommittee of the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence were evaluated. RESULTS Of the 755 registered patients, 576 with initial PBT and no duplicate cancer were evaluated. At final follow-up, 322 patients were alive and 254 had died. The median follow-up period for survivors was 39 months (0-58 months). The median OS time of the 576 patients was 48.8 months (95% CI, 42.0-55.6 months) and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates were 83.8% (95% CI, 80.5%-86.6%), 68.5% (64.5%-72.2%), 58.2% (53.9%-62.2%), and 50.1% (44.9%-55.0%), respectively. Recurrence was observed in 332 patients, including local recurrence in 45 patients. The median PFS time was 14.7 months (95% CI, 12.4-17.0 months) and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year PFS rates were 55.2% (95% CI, 51.0%-59.2%), 37.5% (33.5%-41.5%), 30.2% (26.3%-34.2%), and 22.8% (18.5%-27.4%), respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates were significantly higher for tumor size <5 versus 5 to 10 cm (P < .001) and <5 versus ≥10 cm (P < .001); Child-Pugh score A/B versus C (P < .001); and distance of the tumor from the gastrointestinal tract <1 versus 1 to 2 cm (P < .008) and <1 versus >2 cm (P < .001). At final follow-up, 27 patients (4.7%) had late adverse events of grade 3 or higher, with liver failure (n = 7), and dermatitis (n = 7) being most common. CONCLUSIONS This multicenter prospective data registry indicated that PBT for HCC gives good therapeutic effects (3-year local control rate of 90%) with a low risk of severe late adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan.
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Kazuki Terashima
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, 679-5165, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052, Japan
| | - Takashi Ogino
- Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center, 4423 Higashikata, Ibusuki, Kagoshima, 891-0304, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Tamamura
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Fukui, 910-8526, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Takahiro Waki
- Department of Radiology, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tsuyama, Okayama, 708-0841, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Institute of Medicine, Hokkaido, 060-8648, Japan
| | - Masayuki Araya
- Proton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8510, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Onoe
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Suntou-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Masaru Takagi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 065-0033, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Haruko Numajiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, 679-5165, Japan
| | - Yusuke Uchinami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Institute of Medicine, Hokkaido, 060-8648, Japan
| | - Kazushi Maruo
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Kei Shibuya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Choi JW, Kim HC, Han J, Jang MJ, Chung JW. Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Idarubicin Versus Doxorubicin Chemoemulsion in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (IDADOX): Protocol for a Randomized, Non-inferiority, Double-Blind Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47:372-378. [PMID: 38147153 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03621-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to test the hypothesis that idarubicin-based transarterial chemoembolization (IDA-TACE), using one of the most potent chemotherapeutic agents, could yield oncologic outcomes equivalent to or marginally improved over doxorubicin-based TACE (DOX-TACE). MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-center, prospective, phase II, randomized controlled, non-inferiority, double-blind trial will enroll 128 treatment-naïve patients with HCC (≤ 5 tumors, 1-5 cm in diameter) for conventional TACE. Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either IDA-TACE or DOX-TACE, with stratification by Child-Pugh class. Superselective conventional TACE will be performed using cone-beam CT and small-bore microcatheters. Patient evaluations, including dynamic imaging and blood tests, will occur at 1, 3, and 6 months post-initial treatment. The primary outcome measure is the objective response rate (ORR) according to mRECIST at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include 3-month and 6-month tumor responses, time-to-progression, the incidence of treatment-related serious adverse events within 30 days, and the incidence and severity of any adverse events. STATISTICS Non-inferiority will be claimed if the upper limit of a one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the proportion difference (i.e., "6-month ORR of DOX-TACE" - "6-month ORR of IDA-TACE") falls below 0.15 in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. The proportion difference and its confidence interval will be calculated by the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method to obtain a weighted average of stratum-specific proportion differences. EXPECTED GAIN OF KNOWLEDGE If IDA-TACE demonstrates outcomes comparable to DOX-TACE, this study could provide compelling evidence that various cytotoxic agents yield similar contributions in TACE, considering the minor role of chemotherapeutic agents in TACE. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ). Identifier: NCT06114082. World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) ( https://trialsearch.who.int/Default.aspx ). Identifier: KCT0008166.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Woo Choi
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, #101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Hyo-Cheol Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, #101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jiyeon Han
- Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myoung-Jin Jang
- Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Wook Chung
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, #101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lin Z, Ji X, Tian N, Gan Y, Ke L. APOB is a potential prognostic biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma. Discov Oncol 2024; 15:28. [PMID: 38310202 PMCID: PMC10838261 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-00877-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is significantly associated with adverse prognostic outcomes. The development and progression of different types of human tumors are significantly influenced by APOB. Nevertheless, the significance and pathomechanisms of APOB in HCC have not been conclusively determined. We assessed APOB expression levels in HCC using three publicly available databases of TIMER2.0, UALCAN and Human Protein Atlas. To identify the biological function of APOB, we conducted enrichment analysis via LinkedOmics. Moreover, UALCAN was employed to assess the relationship between APOB expression and clinicopathological features among HCC patients. Additionally, the Kaplan-Meier plotter was utilized to investigate the prognostic relevance of APOB in HCC. To explore potential regulatory ncRNAs that could bind to APOB, we utilized StarBase and GEPIA. Furthermore, the correlation between APOB expression and immune cell infiltration, as well as immune checkpoint genes, was investigated using Spearman's correlation analysis in TISIDB, GEPIA, and TIMER2.0. The findings of our investigation showed a notable decrease in the expression levels of APOB among individuals diagnosed with HCC. Moreover, a noteworthy correlation was observed between the expression of APOB and immune checkpoint genes, alongside the occurrence of immune cell infiltration. The levels of APOB expression in HCC tissues also showed correlations with various clinicopathological features. According to Cox regression analysis, decreased APOB expression emerged as a potential autonomous predictor for OS, RFS, DSS, and PFS among HCC patients. Furthermore, we identified six potential pathways associated with non-coding RNA (ncRNA) as the most promising pathway for APOB in HCC. Our results illuminate the possible involvement of APOB in HCC and offer understanding into its governing mechanisms and medical importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhifeng Lin
- Department of Medical Record; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Xiaohui Ji
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nana Tian
- Department of Medical Record, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Gan
- Department of Medical Record, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Ke
- Department of Medical Record; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jones-Pauley M, Victor DW, Kodali S. Pushing the limits of treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:3-9. [PMID: 38032256 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We review existing and newer strategies for treatment and surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) both pre and postliver transplantation. SUMMARY HCC is rising in incidence and patients are often diagnosed at later stages. Consequently, there is a need for treatment strategies which include collaboration of multiple specialties. Combinations of locoregional, systemic, and surgical therapies are yielding better postliver transplantation (post-LT) outcomes for patients with HCC than previously seen. Tumor biology (tumor size, number, location, serum markers, response to therapy) can help identify patients who are at high risk for HCC recurrence posttransplantation and may expand transplant eligibility for some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David W Victor
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sudha Kodali
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Harada K, Fujikawa T, Uemoto Y, Aibe Y. Successful Multidisciplinary Treatment, Including Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Biological Therapy, for Multiple Hepatocellular Carcinomas Adjacent to Major Vessels: A Case Report. Cureus 2024; 16:e53997. [PMID: 38476801 PMCID: PMC10928465 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) are currently being treated with multimodal therapy that includes liver resection and local therapy. Although the necessity of multimodal therapy for multiple HCCs is evident, treating them is extremely difficult due to the complex nature of multiple HCCs and the frequent occurrence of underlying liver damage. We encountered a case in which long-term tumor control was achieved through multidisciplinary treatment, including atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination biological therapy. As in the current case, less-invasive surgical resection combined with radiofrequency ablation after a combination of biological therapy may be one of the preferred options for the treatment of initially unresectable multiple HCCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Harada
- Surgery, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, JPN
| | | | | | - Yuki Aibe
- Gastroenterology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, JPN
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tanaka T, Ide T, Itoh K, Kai K, Noshiro H. Laparoscopic liver resection for local recurrence after carbon‑ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report. Oncol Lett 2024; 27:78. [PMID: 38192671 PMCID: PMC10773218 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.14211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Numerous potentially curative treatments have become available for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the basis of the individual patient and tumor characteristics. Carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) is a novel treatment option to reduce the physical burden in patients with HCC. However, the long-term outcomes and the clinical and pathological features of locoregional recurrence after initial C-ion RT are unclear. The present study reports the case of a patient who underwent a curative laparoscopic liver resection for the local recurrence of HCC after C-ion RT. A 73-year-old man was diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C and achieved a sustained virological response. During subsequent surveillance, a solitary HCC of 2.3 cm in diameter appeared in liver segment 7 (S7). While surgical resection was considered the best option, the patient chose C-ion RT as the initial HCC treatment. Although C-ion RT appeared to be successful for the primary lesion, enhanced computed tomography revealed that a hypervascular tumor had reappeared in the same area 16 months later. As HCC recurrence was suspected, several different examinations were performed. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed that the recurrent tumor had irregular margins, and communication was suspected with the intrahepatic portal vein. A laparoscopic partial liver resection of S7 was planned. Histopathological examination of the excised specimen revealed proliferation of viable moderately to poorly differentiated HCC, with marked invasive growth and numerous portal vein infiltrations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of surgery for locally recurrent HCC after C-ion RT. Oncological outcomes following C-ion RT for HCC remain unclear. Notably, there are cases of unusual recurrence with massive vascular invasion after C-ion RT. In the present case, the histological features were confirmed after C-ion RT for HCC. This case may raise concerns about the true efficacy of C-ion RT and warns against the easy choice of C-ion RT in spite of a resectable HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomokazu Tanaka
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga 849-8501, Japan
| | - Takao Ide
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga 849-8501, Japan
| | - Kotaro Itoh
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga 849-8501, Japan
| | - Keita Kai
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga 849-8501, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Noshiro
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga 849-8501, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Long H, Zhou X, Zhang X, Ye J, Huang T, Cong L, Xie X, Huang G. 3D fusion is superior to 2D point-to-point contrast-enhanced US to evaluate the ablative margin after RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:1247-1257. [PMID: 37572191 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10023-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the efficiency of three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-derived techniques in evaluating the ablative margin (AM) after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS In total, 98 patients with 98 HCCs were enrolled. The 2D CEUS point-to-point imaging (2D CEUS-PI) was conducted by comparing the pre- and post-RFA 2D CEUS images manually, and the 3D CEUS fusion imaging (3D CEUS-FI) was conducted by fusing the pre- and post-RFA 3D CEUS images automatically. These two techniques were compared in distinguishing an adequate AM ≥ 5 mm. Risk factors for local tumor progression (LTP) after RFA were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. RESULTS The mean registration time of 3D CEUS-FI and 2D CEUS-PI was 5.0 and 9.3 min, respectively (p < 0.0001). The kappa coefficient was 0.680 for agreement between 2D CEUS-PI and 3D CEUS-FI in the evaluation of AM (p < 0.0001). Tumors with AM < 5 mm by 2D CEUS-PI were all identified as AM < 5 mm by 3D CEUS-FI. Nonetheless, 16 (26%) tumors identified as AM ≥ 5 mm by 2D CEUS-PI were re-classified as AM < 5 mm by 3D CEUS-FI. During a median follow-up time of 31.2 months (range, 3.2-66.0 months), LTP was identified in 8 tumors. The estimated 1-/2-/3-year cumulative incidence of LTP was 4.4%, 8.1%, and 10.3%, respectively. Higher estimated cumulative incidence of LTP was identified in tumors with AM < 5 mm by 2D CEUS-PI (at 3-year, 27.2% vs 0%; p < 0.001), and by 3D CEUS-FI (at 3-year, 20.7% vs 0%; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION 3D CEUS-FI excelled in the evaluation of AM when compared with 2D CEUS-PI. With equivalent efficacy in the prediction of LTP, 3D CEUS-FI was superior to 2D CEUS-PI for its automatic and time-saving procedure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT 3D CEUS fusion imaging may serve as an effective tool in evaluating ablative margin and predicting local tumor progression after RFA in HCC. KEY POINTS • Both 2D and 3D CEUS-derived techniques could evaluate ablative margin (AM) after RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma. • 3D CEUS fusion imaging was more precise in the evaluation of AM compared to 2D CEUS point-to-point imaging, with advantages of its automatic and time-saving procedure. • An inadequate AM < 5 mm evaluated by CEUS-derived techniques was the only risk factor of LTP after RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma (p < 0.001 for 2D CEUS point-to-point imaging, and p = 0.004 for 3D CEUS fusion imaging).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiyi Long
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Xiaoyu Zhou
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Xiaoer Zhang
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Jieyi Ye
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Foshan First People's Hospital, 81 Lingnan North Road, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China
| | - Tongyi Huang
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Longfei Cong
- Medical Imaging System Division, Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xiaoyan Xie
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Guangliang Huang
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Guangxi Hospital Division of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee CH, Kim IH. Investigating Alternative Treatment Options Unfeasible for Local Ablation Therapy in Patients with Small Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinomas. Gut Liver 2024; 18:5-6. [PMID: 38221816 PMCID: PMC10791501 DOI: 10.5009/gnl230559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Hun Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University Hospital-Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - In Hee Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University Hospital-Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lim J, Kim E, Kim S, Kim SY, Kim JH, Yoon SM, Shim JH. Chemoembolization versus Radiotherapy for Single Hepatocellular Carcinomas of ≤3 cm Unsuitable for Image-Guided Tumor Ablation. Gut Liver 2024; 18:125-134. [PMID: 37605878 PMCID: PMC10791502 DOI: 10.5009/gnl230080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Local ablation therapy (LAT) is primarily recommended for solitary inoperable hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) of ≤3 cm in diameter. However, only two-thirds of uninodular small HCCs are suitable for LAT, and the second-best treatment option for managing these nodules is unclear. We aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of chemoembolization and radiotherapy in small HCCs unsuitable for LAT. Methods The study included 651 patients from a tertiary referral center who underwent planning sonography for LAT. These patients had 801 solitary HCCs of ≤3 cm in diameter and were treated with LAT, chemoembolization, or radiotherapy. Local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival and overall survival (OS) were measured according to the type of treatment of the index nodule. Results LAT, chemoembolization, and radiotherapy were used to treat 561, 185, and 55 nodules in 467, 148, and 36 patients, respectively. LTP-free survival was significantly shorter in patients treated with chemoembolization than for those treated with LAT (multivariate hazard ratio [HR], 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61 to 3.47) but not for those treated with radiotherapy (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.83). However, OS was not affected by treatment modality. Matching and weighting analyses confirmed that radiotherapy gave comparable results to chemoembolization in terms of OS despite better LTP-free survival (HR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.13 to 7.47 and HR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.11 to 8.48, respectively). Conclusions Our data suggest that chemoembolization and radiotherapy are equally effective options for single small HCCs found to be unsuitable for LAT after sonographic planning. Betterfit indications for each procedure should be established by specifically designed studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihye Lim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Departments of
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Departments of
| | - Euichang Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Departments of
| | - Sehee Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Departments of
| | | | | | - Sang Min Yoon
- Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju Hyun Shim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Departments of
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Niitsu H, Mizumoto M, Li Y, Nakamura M, Ishida T, Iizumi T, Saito T, Numajiri H, Makishima H, Nakai K, Oshiro Y, Maruo K, Sakurai H. Tumor Response on Diagnostic Imaging after Proton Beam Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:357. [PMID: 38254846 PMCID: PMC10814092 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Follow-up after treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be mostly performed using dynamic CT or MRI, but there is no common evaluation method after radiation therapy. The purpose of this study is to examine factors involved in tumor reduction and local recurrence in patients with HCC treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) and to evaluate HCC shrinkage after PBT. METHODS Cases with only one irradiated lesion or those with two lesions irradiated simultaneously were included in this study. Pre- and post-treatment lesions were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) by measuring the largest diameter. RESULTS The 6-, 12-, and 24-month CR + PR rates after PBT were 33.1%, 57.5%, and 76.9%, respectively, and the reduction rates were 25.1% in the first 6 months, 23.3% at 6-12 months, and 14.5% at 13-24 months. Cases that reached CR/PR at 6 and 12 months had improved OS compared to non-CR/non-PR cases. CONCLUSIONS It is possible that a lesion that reached SD may subsequently transition to PR; it is reasonable to monitor progress with periodic imaging evaluations even after 1 year of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikaru Niitsu
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Yinuo Li
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Masatoshi Nakamura
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Toshiki Ishida
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Takashi Iizumi
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Takashi Saito
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Haruko Numajiri
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Hirokazu Makishima
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Kei Nakai
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Yoshiko Oshiro
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8558, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Kazushi Maruo
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan;
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bidarmaghz B, Idrees M, Lee YY, Hodgkinson P. Large hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sequential SBRT and immunotherapy with anti-VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) therapy. BMJ Case Rep 2023; 16:e256931. [PMID: 38061854 PMCID: PMC10711845 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-256931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Managing large solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains challenging as guidelines recommend a palliative approach given the general poor prognosis without accounting for variations in the underlying tumour biology. Surgical resection provides significantly better survival than other modalities for HCC, but only a small proportion of patients with large tumours qualify for surgical resection. Recently, with technological advances in radiation therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as an alternative treatment option for HCC . In this paper, we present a patient who was diagnosed with a 13 cm HCC with vascular invasion. SBRT was delivered as a locoregional therapy followed by immunotherapy with the outcome of complete pathological response observed on right hemi-hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bardia Bidarmaghz
- Transplant, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marwan Idrees
- Transplant, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Yoo Young Lee
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Peter Hodgkinson
- Transplant, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Liu HYH, Lee YYD, Sridharan S, Wang W, Khor R, Chu J, Oar A, Choong ES, Le H, Shanker M, Wigg A, Stuart K, Pryor D. Definitive Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Early-Stage Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Australian Multi-Institutional Review of Outcomes. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:787-793. [PMID: 37709623 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Standard curative options for early-stage, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are often unsuitable due to liver dysfunction, comorbidities and/or tumour location. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has shown high rates of local control in HCC; however, limited data exist in the treatment-naïve, curative-intent setting. We report the outcomes of patients with solitary early-stage HCC treated with SBRT as first-line curative-intent therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multi-institutional retrospective study of treatment-naïve patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A, solitary ≤5 cm HCC, Child-Pugh score (CPS) A liver function who underwent SBRT between 2010 and 2019 as definitive therapy. The primary end point was freedom from local progression. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall survival, rate of treatment-related clinical toxicities and change in CPS >1. RESULTS In total, 68 patients were evaluated, with a median follow-up of 20 months (range 3-58). The median age was 68 years (range 50-86); 54 (79%) were men, 62 (91%) had cirrhosis and 50 (74%) were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0. The median HCC diameter was 2.5 cm (range 1.3-5) and the median prescription biologically effective dose with a tumour a/b ratio of 10 Gy (BED10) was 93 Gy (interquartile range 72-100 Gy). Two-year freedom from local progression, progression-free survival and overall survival were 94.3% (95% confidence interval 86.6-100%), 59.5% (95% confidence interval 46.3-76.4%) and 88% (95% confidence interval 79.2-97.6%), respectively. Nine patients (13.2%) experienced grade ≥2 treatment-related clinical toxicities. A rise >1 in CPS was observed in six cirrhotic patients (9.6%). CONCLUSION SBRT is an effective and well-tolerated option to consider in patients with solitary, early-stage HCC. Prospective, randomised comparative studies are warranted to further refine its role as a first-line curative-intent therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Y-H Liu
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Y-Y D Lee
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - S Sridharan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - W Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - R Khor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - J Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - A Oar
- Icon Cancer Centre, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - E S Choong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - H Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - M Shanker
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - A Wigg
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Medicine Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - K Stuart
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - D Pryor
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Singal AG, Llovet JM, Yarchoan M, Mehta N, Heimbach JK, Dawson LA, Jou JH, Kulik LM, Agopian VG, Marrero JA, Mendiratta-Lala M, Brown DB, Rilling WS, Goyal L, Wei AC, Taddei TH. AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2023; 78:1922-1965. [PMID: 37199193 PMCID: PMC10663390 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 304] [Impact Index Per Article: 304.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Amit G. Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Josep M. Llovet
- Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Translational Research in Hepatic Oncology, Liver Unit, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Mark Yarchoan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Neil Mehta
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Laura A. Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program/University Health Network, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Janice H. Jou
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Laura M. Kulik
- Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Vatche G. Agopian
- The Dumont–University of California, Los Angeles, Transplant Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jorge A. Marrero
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mishal Mendiratta-Lala
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Daniel B. Brown
- Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - William S. Rilling
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Lipika Goyal
- Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Alice C. Wei
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Tamar H. Taddei
- Department of Medicine (Digestive Diseases), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wade R, South E, Anwer S, Sharif-Hurst S, Harden M, Fulbright H, Hodgson R, Dias S, Simmonds M, Rowe I, Thornton P, Eastwood A. Ablative and non-surgical therapies for early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess 2023; 27:1-172. [PMID: 38149643 PMCID: PMC11017143 DOI: 10.3310/gk5221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A wide range of ablative and non-surgical therapies are available for treating small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with very early or early-stage disease and preserved liver function. Objective To review and compare the effectiveness of all current ablative and non-surgical therapies for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 3 cm). Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data sources Nine databases (March 2021), two trial registries (April 2021) and reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. Review methods Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials of ablative and non-surgical therapies, versus any comparator, for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Randomised controlled trials were quality assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and mapped. The comparative effectiveness of therapies was assessed using network meta-analysis. A threshold analysis was used to identify which comparisons were sensitive to potential changes in the evidence. Where comparisons based on randomised controlled trial evidence were not robust or no randomised controlled trials were identified, a targeted systematic review of non-randomised, prospective comparative studies provided additional data for repeat network meta-analysis and threshold analysis. The feasibility of undertaking economic modelling was explored. A workshop with patients and clinicians was held to discuss the findings and identify key priorities for future research. Results Thirty-seven randomised controlled trials (with over 3700 relevant patients) were included in the review. The majority were conducted in China or Japan and most had a high risk of bias or some risk of bias concerns. The results of the network meta-analysis were uncertain for most comparisons. There was evidence that percutaneous ethanol injection is inferior to radiofrequency ablation for overall survival (hazard ratio 1.45, 95% credible interval 1.16 to 1.82), progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% credible interval 1.11 to 1.67), overall recurrence (relative risk 1.19, 95% credible interval 1.02 to 1.39) and local recurrence (relative risk 1.80, 95% credible interval 1.19 to 2.71). Percutaneous acid injection was also inferior to radiofrequency ablation for progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.63, 95% credible interval 1.05 to 2.51). Threshold analysis showed that further evidence could plausibly change the result for some comparisons. Fourteen eligible non-randomised studies were identified (n ≥ 2316); twelve had a high risk of bias so were not included in updated network meta-analyses. Additional non-randomised data, made available by a clinical advisor, were also included (n = 303). There remained a high level of uncertainty in treatment rankings after the network meta-analyses were updated. However, the updated analyses suggested that microwave ablation and resection are superior to percutaneous ethanol injection and percutaneous acid injection for some outcomes. Further research on stereotactic ablative radiotherapy was recommended at the workshop, although it is only appropriate for certain patient subgroups, limiting opportunities for adequately powered trials. Limitations Many studies were small and of poor quality. No comparative studies were found for some therapies. Conclusions The existing evidence base has limitations; the uptake of specific ablative therapies in the United Kingdom appears to be based more on technological advancements and ease of use than strong evidence of clinical effectiveness. However, there is evidence that percutaneous ethanol injection and percutaneous acid injection are inferior to radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation and resection. Study registration PROSPERO CRD42020221357. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR131224) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 29. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ros Wade
- Research Fellow, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Emily South
- Research Fellow, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Sumayya Anwer
- Research Fellow, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Sahar Sharif-Hurst
- Research Fellow, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Melissa Harden
- Information Specialist, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Helen Fulbright
- Information Specialist, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Robert Hodgson
- Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Sofia Dias
- Professor in Health Technology Assessment, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Mark Simmonds
- Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Ian Rowe
- Honorary Consultant Hepatologist, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | - Alison Eastwood
- Professor of Research, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
South E, Wade R, Anwer S, Sharif‐Hurst S, Harden M, Fulbright H, Dias S, Simmonds M, Rowe I, Thornton P, Wah TM, Eastwood A. The effectiveness of ablative and non-surgical therapies for early hepatocellular carcinoma: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Med 2023; 12:20759-20772. [PMID: 37902128 PMCID: PMC10709740 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Non-surgical therapies are frequently used for patients with early or very early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of ablative and non-surgical therapies for patients with small HCC. METHODS Nine databases were searched (March 2021) along with clinical trial registries. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of any ablative or non-surgical therapy versus any comparator in patients with HCC ≤3 cm were eligible. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. The effectiveness of therapies was compared using NMA. Threshold analysis was undertaken to identify which NMA results had less robust evidence. RESULTS Thirty-seven eligible RCTs were included (including over 3700 patients). Most were from China (n = 17) or Japan (n = 7). Sample sizes ranged from 30 to 308 patients. The majority had a high RoB or some RoB concerns. No RCTs were identified for some therapies and no RCTs reported quality of life outcomes. The results of the NMA and treatment effectiveness rankings were very uncertain. However, the evidence demonstrated that percutaneous ethanol injection was worse than radiofrequency ablation for overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.45, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 1.16-1.82), progression-free survival (HR: 1.36, 95% CrI: 1.11-1.67), overall recurrence (relative risk [RR]: 1.19, 95% CrI: 1.02-1.39) and local recurrence (RR: 1.80, 95% CrI: 1.19-2.71). The threshold analysis suggested that robust evidence was lacking for some comparisons. CONCLUSIONS It is unclear which treatment is most effective for patients with small HCC because of limitations in the evidence base. It is also not known how these treatments would impact on quality of life. Further high quality RCTs are needed to provide robust evidence but may be difficult to undertake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily South
- Centre for Reviews and DisseminationUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | - Ros Wade
- Centre for Reviews and DisseminationUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | - Sumayya Anwer
- Centre for Reviews and DisseminationUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | | | - Melissa Harden
- Centre for Reviews and DisseminationUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | - Helen Fulbright
- Centre for Reviews and DisseminationUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | - Sofia Dias
- Centre for Reviews and DisseminationUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | - Mark Simmonds
- Centre for Reviews and DisseminationUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | - Ian Rowe
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
| | | | | | - Alison Eastwood
- Centre for Reviews and DisseminationUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Liao M, Chen F, Chen L, Wu Z, Huang J, Pang H, Cheng C, Wu Z, Ma L, Lu Q. Synergistic Enzyme-Mimetic Catalysis-Based Non-Thermal Sonocavitation and Sonodynamic Therapy for Efficient Hypoxia Relief and Cancer Ablation. SMALL (WEINHEIM AN DER BERGSTRASSE, GERMANY) 2023; 19:e2302744. [PMID: 37322373 DOI: 10.1002/smll.202302744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Non-invasive cancer treatment strategies that enable local non-thermal ablation, hypoxia relief, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production to achieve transiently destroying tumor tissue and long-term killing tumor cells would greatly facilitate their clinical applications. However, continuously generating oxygen cavitation nuclei, reducing the transient cavitation sound intensity threshold, relieving hypoxia, and improving its controllability in the ablation area still remains a significant challenge. Here, in this work, an Mn-coordinated polyphthalocyanine sonocavitation agent (Mn-SCA) with large d-π-conjugated network and atomic Mn-N sites is identified for the non-thermal sonocavitation and sonodynamic therapy in the liver cancer ablation. In the tumor microenvironment, the catalytical generation of oxygen assists cavitation formation and generates microjets to ablate liver cancer tissue and relieve hypoxia, this work reports for the first time to utilize the enzymatic properties of Mn-SCA to lower the cavitation threshold in situ. Moreover, under pHIFU irradiation, high reactive oxygen species (ROS) production can be achieved. The two merits in liver cancer ablation are demonstrated by cell destruction and high tumor inhibition efficiency. This work will help deepen the understanding of cavitation ablation and the sonodynamic mechanisms related to the nanostructures and guide the design of sonocavitation agents with high ROS production for solid tumor ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Liao
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Fan Chen
- College of Polymer Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China
| | - Lin Chen
- School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China
| | - Zihe Wu
- School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China
| | - Jianbo Huang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Houqing Pang
- Department of Ultrasound, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Chong Cheng
- College of Polymer Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China
| | - Zhe Wu
- College of Polymer Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China
| | - Lang Ma
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Qiang Lu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yoon SM. Novel paradigm in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Anticipating breakthroughs with particle therapy. Clin Mol Hepatol 2023; 29:977-979. [PMID: 37652077 PMCID: PMC10577346 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2023.0336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Min Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zhou J, Sun H, Wang Z, Cong W, Zeng M, Zhou W, Bie P, Liu L, Wen T, Kuang M, Han G, Yan Z, Wang M, Liu R, Lu L, Ren Z, Zeng Z, Liang P, Liang C, Chen M, Yan F, Wang W, Hou J, Ji Y, Yun J, Bai X, Cai D, Chen W, Chen Y, Cheng W, Cheng S, Dai C, Guo W, Guo Y, Hua B, Huang X, Jia W, Li Q, Li T, Li X, Li Y, Li Y, Liang J, Ling C, Liu T, Liu X, Lu S, Lv G, Mao Y, Meng Z, Peng T, Ren W, Shi H, Shi G, Shi M, Song T, Tao K, Wang J, Wang K, Wang L, Wang W, Wang X, Wang Z, Xiang B, Xing B, Xu J, Yang J, Yang J, Yang Y, Yang Y, Ye S, Yin Z, Zeng Y, Zhang B, Zhang B, Zhang L, Zhang S, Zhang T, Zhang Y, Zhao M, Zhao Y, Zheng H, Zhou L, Zhu J, Zhu K, Liu R, Shi Y, Xiao Y, Zhang L, Yang C, Wu Z, Dai Z, Chen M, Cai J, Wang W, Cai X, Li Q, Shen F, Qin S, Teng G, Dong J, Fan J. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2022 Edition). Liver Cancer 2023; 12:405-444. [PMID: 37901768 PMCID: PMC10601883 DOI: 10.1159/000530495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Primary liver cancer, of which around 75-85% is hepatocellular carcinoma in China, is the fourth most common malignancy and the second leading cause of tumor-related death, thereby posing a significant threat to the life and health of the Chinese people. Summary Since the publication of Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer in China in June 2017, which were updated by the National Health Commission in December 2019, additional high-quality evidence has emerged from researchers worldwide regarding the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of liver cancer, that requires the guidelines to be updated again. The new edition (2022 Edition) was written by more than 100 experts in the field of liver cancer in China, which not only reflects the real-world situation in China but also may reshape the nationwide diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer. Key Messages The new guideline aims to encourage the implementation of evidence-based practice and improve the national average 5-year survival rate for patients with liver cancer, as proposed in the "Health China 2030 Blueprint."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Zhou
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Huichuan Sun
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenming Cong
- Department of Pathology, The Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengsu Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiping Zhou
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Bie
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Lianxin Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Tianfu Wen
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ming Kuang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guohong Han
- Department of Liver Diseases and Digestive Interventional Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Zhiping Yan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Maoqiang Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ruibao Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Ligong Lu
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenggang Ren
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhaochong Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Liang
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Changhong Liang
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Min Chen
- Editorial Department of Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, Chongqing, China
| | - Fuhua Yan
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenping Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinlin Hou
- Department of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuan Ji
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingping Yun
- Department of Pathology, Tumor Prevention and Treatment Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xueli Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Dingfang Cai
- Department of Integrative Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weixia Chen
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yongjun Chen
- Department of Hematology, Ruijin Hospital North, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenwu Cheng
- Department of Integrated Therapy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuqun Cheng
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chaoliu Dai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Spleenary Surgery, The Affiliated Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Wengzhi Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yabing Guo
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Baojin Hua
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaowu Huang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weidong Jia
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Qiu Li
- Department of Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xun Li
- The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yaming Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yexiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Changquan Ling
- Changhai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tianshu Liu
- Department of Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiufeng Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, PLA Cancer Center, Nanjing Bayi Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Shichun Lu
- Institute and Hospital of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Chinese PLA Medical School, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Guoyue Lv
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Yilei Mao
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) Hospital, PUMC and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiqiang Meng
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Peng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Weixin Ren
- Department of Interventional Radiology the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Hongcheng Shi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoming Shi
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ming Shi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tianqiang Song
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Kaishan Tao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Jianhua Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kui Wang
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wentao Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiming Wang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Bangde Xiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Baocai Xing
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jianming Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Affiliated Hospital Cancer Center, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jiamei Yang
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianyong Yang
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yefa Yang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Interventional Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunke Yang
- Department of Integrative Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shenglong Ye
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenyu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yong Zeng
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Bixiang Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Boheng Zhang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Leida Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery Institute, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Shuijun Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, ZhengZhou, China
| | - Ti Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanqiao Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Ming Zhao
- Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Liver Cancer Group, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yongfu Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, ZhengZhou, China
| | - Honggang Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ledu Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jiye Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kangshun Zhu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rong Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yinghong Shi
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongsheng Xiao
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lan Zhang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chun Yang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhifeng Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi Dai
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Minshan Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianqiang Cai
- Department of Abdominal Surgical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weilin Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiujun Cai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Feng Shen
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shukui Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, PLA Cancer Center, Nanjing Bayi Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Gaojun Teng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiahong Dong
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital (BTCH), School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kim HI, An J, Han S, Shim JH. Loco-regional therapies competing with radiofrequency ablation in potential indications for hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis. Clin Mol Hepatol 2023; 29:1013-1028. [PMID: 37403319 PMCID: PMC10577337 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2023.0131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS There is no clear consensus on the relative ranking of interventional and radiation techniques with indications similar to those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We used a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of non-surgical treatments for early HCC. METHODS We searched databases for randomized trials assessing the efficacy of loco-regional treatments for HCCs ≤5 cm with no extrahepatic spread or portal invasion. The primary outcome was the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes included overall and local progression-free survival (PFS). A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed, and the relative ranking of therapies was assessed with P-scores. RESULTS Nineteen studies comparing 11 different strategies in 2,793 patients were included. Chemoembolization plus RFA improved OS better than RFA alone (HR 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.82; P-score=0.951). Cryoablation, microwave ablation, laser ablation, and proton beam therapy had similar effects on OS compared with RFA. For overall PFS, but not local PFS, only chemoembolization plus RFA performed significantly better than RFA (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.88; P-score=0.964). Injection of percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid was significantly less effective than RFA for all measured outcomes, while no differences in progression outcomes were identified for other therapies included in the network. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that chemoembolization combined with RFA is the best option for local treatment of early HCC. Cases with potential contraindications for RFA may benefit from a tailored approach using thermal or radiation modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ha Il Kim
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
| | - Jihyun An
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
| | - Seungbong Han
- Biostatistics, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju Hyun Shim
- Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lee SU, Kim TH. Current evidence and the potential role of proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2023; 29:958-968. [PMID: 37822213 PMCID: PMC10577334 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2023.0274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death, and external beam radiation therapy has emerged as a promising approach for managing HCC. Proton beam therapy (PBT) offers dosimetric advantages over X-ray therapy, with superior physical properties known as the Bragg peak. PBT holds promise for reducing hepatotoxicity and allowing safe dose-escalation to the tumor. It has been tried in various clinical conditions and has shown promising local tumor control and survival outcomes. A recent phase III trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of PBT in local tumor control compared to current standard radiofrequency ablation in early-stage HCC. PBT also tended to show more favorable outcomes compared to transarterial chemoembolization in the intermediate stage, and has proven effective in-field disease control and safe toxicity profiles in advanced HCC. In this review, we discuss the rationale, clinical studies, optimal indication, and future directions of PBT in HCC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Uk Lee
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Liu T, Liu L, Li L, Cai J. Exploiting targeted nanomedicine for surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mater Today Bio 2023; 22:100766. [PMID: 37636988 PMCID: PMC10457457 DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the cancers that has the highest morbidity and mortality rates. In clinical practice, there are still many limitations in surveilling, diagnosing, and treating HCC, such as the poor detection of early HCC, the frequent post-surgery recurrence, the low local tumor control rate, the therapy resistance and side effects. Therefore, improved, or innovative modalities are urgently required for early diagnosis as well as refined and effective management. In recent years, nanotechnology research in the field of HCC has received great attention, with various aspects of diagnosis and treatment including biomarkers, ultrasound, diagnostic imaging, intraoperative imaging, ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy. Different from previous reviews that discussed from the perspective of nanoparticles' structure, design and function, this review systematically summarizes the methods and limitations of diagnosing and treating HCC in clinical guidelines and practices, as well as nanomedicine applications. Nanomedicine can overcome the limitations to improve diagnosis accuracy and therapeutic effect via enhancement of targeting, biocompatibility, bioavailability, controlled releasing, and combination of different clinical treatment modalities. Through an in-depth understanding of the logic of nanotechnology to conquer clinical limitations, the main research directions of nanotechnology in HCC are sorted out in this review. It is anticipated that nanomedicine will play a significant role in the future clinical practices of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Liu
- Department of Medical Imaging, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, China
| | - Li Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518000, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Medical Imaging, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, China
| | - Jing Cai
- Department of Medical Imaging, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for RNA Medicine, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kim TH. Has the growing evidence of radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma increased the use of radiotherapy in elderly patients? Radiat Oncol J 2023; 41:141-143. [PMID: 37793622 PMCID: PMC10556838 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2023.00710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Hyun Kim
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kim TH, Kim BH, Cho YR, Koh YH, Park JW. Feasibility of additional radiotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. JOURNAL OF LIVER CANCER 2023; 23:330-340. [PMID: 37488926 PMCID: PMC10565546 DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2023.04.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective local treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, whether additional RT is safe and effective in patients with advanced HCC receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of additional RT in these patients. METHODS Between March and October 2021, we retrospectively analyzed seven patients with advanced HCC who received RT during treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. The median prescribed RT dose was 35 Gy (range, 33-66). Freedom from local progression (FFLP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after RT were analyzed. RESULTS The median follow-up duration after RT was 14.2 months (range, 10.0-18.6). Of the seven patients, disease progression was noted in six (85.7%), the sites of disease progression were local in two (28.6%), intrahepatic in four (57.1%), and extrahepatic in four (57.1%). The median time of FFLP was not reached, and PFS and OS times were 4.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6-4.5) and 14.8% (95% CI, 12.5-17.2) months, respectively. The 1-year FFLP, PFS, and OS rates were 60% (95% CI, 43.8-76.2), 0%, and 85.7% (95% CI, 75.9-95.5), respectively. Grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events (AEs) were not observed, but grade 3 nonhematologic AEs unrelated to RT were observed in one patient. CONCLUSIONS The addition of RT may be feasible in patients with advanced HCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. However, further studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Hyun Kim
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Bo Hyun Kim
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yu Ri Cho
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Young-Hwan Koh
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Joong-Won Park
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Tang J, Long G, Li X, Zhou L, Zhou Y, Wu Z. The deubiquitinase EIF3H promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by stabilizing OGT and inhibiting ferroptosis. Cell Commun Signal 2023; 21:198. [PMID: 37559097 PMCID: PMC10413709 DOI: 10.1186/s12964-023-01220-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent and lethal human malignancies, and with quite limited treatment alternatives. The proteasome is responsible for most of the protein degradation in eukaryotic cells and required for the maintenance of intracellular homeostasis. However, its potential role in HCC is largely unknown. In the current study, we identified eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit H (EIF3H), belonging to the JAB1/MPN/MOV34 (JAMM) superfamily, as a bona fide deubiquitylase of O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) in HCC. We explored that EIF3H was positively associated with OGT in HCC and was related to the unfavorable prognosis. EIF3H could interact with, deubiquitylate, and stabilize OGT in a deubiquitylase-dependent manner. Specifically, EIF3H was associated with the GT domain of ERα via its JAB/MP domain, thus inhibiting the K48-linked ubiquitin chain on OGT. Besides, we demonstrated that the knockdown of EIF3H significantly reduced OGT protein expression, cell proliferation and invasion, and caused G1/S arrest of HCC. We also found that the deletion of EIF3H prompted ferroptosis in HCC cells. Finally, the effects of EIF3H depletion could be reversed by further OGT overexpression, implying that the OGT status is indispensable for EIF3H function in HCC carcinogenesis. In summary, our study described the oncogenic function of EIF3H and revealed an interesting post-translational mechanism between EIF3H, OGT, and ferroptosis in HCC. Targeting the EIF3H may be a promising approach in HCC. Video Abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianing Tang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Guo Long
- Department of Liver Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Xuanxuan Li
- Department of Liver Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Ledu Zhou
- Department of Liver Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Yangying Zhou
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
| | - Zheyu Wu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Poruk KE, Shah R, Grandhi MS, Wright GP, Parikh AA. External Beam Radiation Therapy for Primary Liver Cancers: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline-A Surgical Perspective. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:4556-4559. [PMID: 37179271 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13586-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Poruk
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Newnan, GA, USA
| | - Rupen Shah
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Health Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Miral S Grandhi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - G Paul Wright
- Department of Surgery, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Alexander A Parikh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wu X, Lokken RP, Mehta N. Optimal treatment for small HCC (<3 cm): Resection, liver transplantation, or locoregional therapy? JHEP Rep 2023; 5:100781. [PMID: 37456674 PMCID: PMC10339255 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the most common form of liver cancer, accounting for 90% of all primary liver cancers. Up to 30% of HCC cases could be small (2-3 cm in diameter) at the time of diagnosis with advances in imaging techniques and surveillance programmes. Treating patients with early-stage HCC can be complex and often requires interdisciplinary care, owing to the wide and increasing variety of treatment options, which include liver resection, liver transplantation, and various locoregional therapies offered by interventional radiology and radiation oncology. Decisions regarding the optimal management strategy for a patient involve many considerations, including patient- and tumour-specific characteristics, as well as socioeconomic factors. In this review, we aim to comprehensively summarise the commonly used therapies for single, small HCC (<3 cm), with a focus on the impact of tumour size (<2 cm vs. 2-3 cm), as well as a brief discussion on the cost-effectiveness of the different treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Wu
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ryan Peter Lokken
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Neil Mehta
- Department of General Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Doi Y, Nagata Y, Matsumoto Y, Numata K, Sasaki R, Yamada T, Igaki H, Imagumbai T, Katoh N, Yoshitake T, Shimizuguchi T, Fujioka D, Inoue M, Koide Y, Kimura T, Ito Y. Multicenter retrospective study of stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with previously untreated initial small hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 2023; 53:749-760. [PMID: 37036153 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
AIM We aimed to verify the therapeutic efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for previously untreated initial small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a multicenter, retrospective study. METHODS Patients who underwent SBRT for HCC at the Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology (JCOG) member hospitals in Japan between July 2013 and December 2017 and met the following eligibility criteria were included: (1) initial HCC; (2) ≤3 nodules, ≤5 cm in diameter; (3) Child-Pugh score of A or B; and (4) unsuitability for or refusal of standard treatment. We analyzed the overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and cumulative incidence of local recurrence rate, and adverse events directly related to SBRT. RESULTS Seventy-three patients with 79 lesions from 14 hospitals were analyzed. The median age was 77 years (range: 50-89 years), and the median tumor size was 23 mm (range: 6-50 mm). The median radiation dose was 40 Gy (range: 35-60 Gy) in five fractions (range: 4-8). The median follow-up period was 45 months (range: 0-103 months). The 3-year overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and cumulative incidence of local recurrence rates were 69.9% (95% CI: 58.7%-81%), 57.9% (95% CI: 45.2%-70.5%), and 20.0% (95% CI: 11.2%-30.5%), respectively. Four cases (5.5%) of adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported: three cases of grade 3 and one case of grade 4 (duodenal ulcer). No grade 5 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION SBRT is a promising treatment modality, particularly for small HCCs, as they are not suitable for standard treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiko Doi
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, Hiroshima, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yasushi Nagata
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, Hiroshima, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yasuo Matsumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Kazushi Numata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Ryu Sasaki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Takashi Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yamanashi University Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Imagumbai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tadamasa Yoshitake
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyusyu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takuya Shimizuguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Den Fujioka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsukuba University Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Minoru Inoue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yutaro Koide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tomoki Kimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kochi University Hospital, Kochi, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Shannon AH, Manne A, Diaz Pardo DA, Pawlik TM. Combined radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1193762. [PMID: 37554167 PMCID: PMC10405730 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1193762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and a leading cause of cancer related death worldwide. Until recently, systemic therapy for advanced HCC, defined as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B or C, was limited and ineffective in terms of long-term survival. However, over the past decade, immune check point inhibitors (ICI) combinations have emerged as a potential therapeutic option for patients with nonresectable disease. ICI modulate the tumor microenvironment to prevent progression of the tumor. Radiotherapy is a crucial tool in treating unresectable HCC and may enhance the efficacy of ICI by manipulating the tumor microenvironment and decreasing tumor resistance to certain therapies. We herein review developments in the field of ICI combined with radiotherapy for the treatment of HCC, as well as look at challenges associated with these treatment modalities, and review future directions of combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander H. Shannon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Ashish Manne
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Dayssy A. Diaz Pardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Comprehensive Cancer Center-James Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Moon AM, Kim HP, Singal AG, Owen D, Mendiratta-Lala M, Parikh ND, Rose SC, McGinty KA, Agala CB, Burke LM, Abate A, Altun E, Beyer C, Do J, Folkert MR, Forbes C, Hattangadi-Gluth JA, Hayashi PH, Jones K, Khatri G, Kono Y, Lawrence TS, Maurino C, Mauro DM, Mayo CS, Pak T, Patil P, Sanders EC, Simpson DR, Tepper JE, Thapa D, Yanagihara TK, Wang K, Gerber DA. Thermal ablation compared to stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective comparative study. Hepatol Commun 2023; 7:e00184. [PMID: 37314737 PMCID: PMC10270501 DOI: 10.1097/hc9.0000000000000184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AIMS Early-stage HCC can be treated with thermal ablation or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We retrospectively compared local progression, mortality, and toxicity among patients with HCC treated with ablation or SBRT in a multicenter, US cohort. APPROACH RESULTS We included adult patients with treatment-naïve HCC lesions without vascular invasion treated with thermal ablation or SBRT per individual physician or institutional preference from January 2012 to December 2018. Outcomes included local progression after a 3-month landmark period assessed at the lesion level and overall survival at the patient level. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for imbalances in treatment groups. The Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to compare progression and overall survival, and logistic regression was used for toxicity. There were 642 patients with 786 lesions (median size: 2.1 cm) treated with ablation or SBRT. In adjusted analyses, SBRT was associated with a reduced risk of local progression compared to ablation (aHR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.15-0.60). However, SBRT-treated patients had an increased risk of liver dysfunction at 3 months (absolute difference 5.5%, aOR 2.31, 95% CI: 1.13-4.73) and death (aHR 2.04, 95% CI: 1.44-2.88, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter study of patients with HCC, SBRT was associated with a lower risk of local progression compared to thermal ablation but higher all-cause mortality. Survival differences may be attributable to residual confounding, patient selection, or downstream treatments. These retrospective real-world data help guide treatment decisions while demonstrating the need for a prospective clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M. Moon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hannah P. Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Amit G. Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Neehar D. Parikh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Steven C. Rose
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Katrina A. McGinty
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Chris B. Agala
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lauren M. Burke
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anjelica Abate
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ersan Altun
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christian Beyer
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Baylor Scott and White Hospital System, Waxahachie, Texas, USA
| | - John Do
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Michael R. Folkert
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, New York, USA
| | - Chalon Forbes
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jona A. Hattangadi-Gluth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Paul H. Hayashi
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Keri Jones
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Gaurav Khatri
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Yuko Kono
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Theodore S. Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Christopher Maurino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - David M. Mauro
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charles S. Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Taemee Pak
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Preethi Patil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Emily C. Sanders
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel R. Simpson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Joel E. Tepper
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Diwash Thapa
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ted K. Yanagihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kyle Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - David A. Gerber
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kaestner L, Streb L, Hetjens S, Buergy D, Sihono DS, Fleckenstein J, Kalisch I, Eckl M, Giordano FA, Lohr F, Stieler F, Boda-Heggemann J. Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 27:100455. [PMID: 37720462 PMCID: PMC10500027 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Spirometry induced deep-inspiration-breath-hold (DIBH) reduces intrafractional motion during upper abdominal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether surface scanning (SGRT) is an adequate surrogate for monitoring residual internal motion during DIBH. Residual motion detected by SGRT was compared with experimental 4D-ultrasound (US) and an internal motion detection benchmark (diaphragm-dome-position in kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) projections). Materials and methods Intrafractional monitoring was performed with SGRT and US in 460 DIBHs of 12 patients. Residual motion detected by all modalities (SGRT (anterior-posterior (AP)), US (AP, craniocaudal (CC)) and CBCT (CC)) was analyzed. Agreement analysis included Wilcoxon signed rank test, Maloney and Rastogi's test, Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Interquartile range was 0.7 mm (US(AP)), 0.8 mm (US(CC)), 0.9 mm (SGRT) and 0.8 mm (CBCT). SGRT(AP) vs. CBCT(CC) and US(CC) vs. CBCT(CC) showed comparable agreement (PCCs 0.53 and 0.52, ICCs 0.51 and 0.49) with slightly higher precision of CBCT(CC). Most agreement was observed for SGRT(AP) vs. US(AP) with largest PCC (0.61) and ICC (0.60), least agreement for SGRT(AP) vs. US(CC) with smallest PCC (0.44) and ICC (0.42). Conclusions Residual motion detected during spirometry induced DIBH is small. SGRT alone is no sufficient surrogate for residual internal motion in all patients as some high velocity motion could not be detected. Observed patient-specific residual errors may require individualized PTV-margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Kaestner
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Lara Streb
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Svetlana Hetjens
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Daniel Buergy
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Dwi S.K. Sihono
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
- Departemen Fisika, FMIPA, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia
| | - Jens Fleckenstein
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Iris Kalisch
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Miriam Eckl
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frank A. Giordano
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frank Lohr
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
- Struttura Complessa di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Oncologia, Az. Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41122 Modena, Italy
| | - Florian Stieler
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Judit Boda-Heggemann
- University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Fayn S, King AP, Gutsche NT, Duan Z, Buffington J, Olkowski CP, Fu Y, Hong J, Sail D, Baidoo KE, Swenson RE, Cheloha RW, Ho M, Choyke PL, Escorcia FE. Site-Specifically Conjugated Single-Domain Antibody Successfully Identifies Glypican-3-Expressing Liver Cancer by Immuno-PET. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:1017-1023. [PMID: 36997331 PMCID: PMC10315705 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and its incidence and mortality are increasing worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 80% of primary liver cancer cases. Glypican-3 (GPC3) is a heparan sulfate proteoglycan that histopathologically defines HCC and represents an attractive tumor-selective marker for radiopharmaceutical imaging and therapy for this disease. Single-domain antibodies are a promising scaffold for imaging because of their favorable pharmacokinetic properties, good tumor penetration, and renal clearance. Although conventional lysine-directed bioconjugation can be used to yield conjugates for radiolabeling full-length antibodies, this stochastic approach risks negatively affecting target binding of the smaller single-domain antibodies. To address this challenge, site-specific approaches have been explored. Here, we used conventional and sortase-based site-specific conjugation methods to engineer GPC3-specific human single-domain antibody (HN3) PET probes. Methods: Bifunctional deferoxamine (DFO) isothiocyanate was used to synthesize native HN3 (nHN3)-DFO. Site-specifically modified HN3 (ssHN3)-DFO was engineered using sortase-mediated conjugation of triglycine-DFO chelator and HN3 containing an LPETG C-terminal tag. Both conjugates were radiolabeled with 89Zr, and their binding affinity in vitro and target engagement of GPC3-positive (GPC3+) tumors in vivo were determined. Results: Both 89Zr-ssHN3 and 89Zr-nHN3 displayed nanomolar affinity for GPC3 in vitro. Biodistribution and PET/CT image analysis in mice bearing isogenic A431 and A431-GPC3+ xenografts, as well as in HepG2 liver cancer xenografts, showed that both conjugates specifically identify GPC3+ tumors. 89Zr-ssHN3 exhibited more favorable biodistribution and pharmacokinetic properties, including higher tumor uptake and lower liver accumulation. Comparative PET/CT studies on mice imaged with both 18F-FDG and 89Zr-ssHN3 showed more consistent tumor accumulation for the single-domain antibody conjugate, further establishing its potential for PET imaging. Conclusion: 89Zr-ssHN3 showed clear advantages in tumor uptake and tumor-to-liver signal ratio over the conventionally modified 89Zr-nHN3 in xenograft models. Our results establish the potential of HN3-based single-domain antibody probes for GPC3-directed PET imaging of liver cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley Fayn
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - A Paden King
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Nicholas T Gutsche
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Zhijian Duan
- Antibody Engineering Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jesse Buffington
- Antibody Engineering Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Colleen P Olkowski
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ying Fu
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jessica Hong
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Deepak Sail
- Chemistry and Synthesis Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Kwamena E Baidoo
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Rolf E Swenson
- Chemistry and Synthesis Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Ross W Cheloha
- Chemical Biology in Signaling Section, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and
| | - Mitchell Ho
- Antibody Engineering Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Peter L Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Freddy E Escorcia
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland;
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Fonseca LG, Chen AT, de Oliveira IS, Chagas AL, Kruger JA, Carrilho FJ. Brazilian Landscape of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. JCO Glob Oncol 2023; 9:e2200416. [PMID: 37348031 PMCID: PMC10497258 DOI: 10.1200/go.22.00416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is expected to increase in the coming years, and strategies to mitigate the burden of this disease are needed in different regions. Geographic variations in epidemiology and risk factors, such as viral hepatitis and metabolic disease, pose challenges in adopting programs for early detection programs and management of patients with HCC. Brazil, like other countries, has high economic and social inequality, with heterogeneous access to health care. Viral hepatitis is the main risk factor but there is growing awareness of fatty liver disease. Risk factor monitoring and screening programs are unmet priorities because patients are often diagnosed at later stages. Advances in the management of patients with HCC have been made in recent years, including new tools for selecting patients for liver transplantation, sophisticated surgical techniques, and new systemic agents. High-volume academic centers often achieve favorable results through the adoption and application of established treatments, but this is not a reality in most regions of Brazil, because of disparities in wealth and resources. As HCC management requires a coordinated and multidisciplinary team, the role of local referral centers in decentralizing access to treatments and promoting health education in different regions should be encouraged and supported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo G. Fonseca
- Medical Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Andre T.C. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Irai S. de Oliveira
- Department of Radiology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Aline L. Chagas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jaime A.P. Kruger
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Flair J. Carrilho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Liu Y, Chou B, Yalamanchili A, Lim SN, Dawson LA, Thomas TO. Local Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Role of MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12103517. [PMID: 37240623 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver tumor, with a continually rising incidence. The curative treatment for HCC is surgical resection or liver transplantation; however, only a small portion of patients are eligible due to local tumor burden or underlying liver dysfunction. Most HCC patients receive nonsurgical liver-directed therapies (LDTs), including thermal ablation, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Stereotactic ablative body radiation (SABR) is a specific type of EBRT that can precisely deliver a high dose of radiation to ablate tumor cells using a small number of treatments (or fractions, typically 5 or less). With onboard MRI imaging, MRI-guided SABR can improve therapeutic dose while minimizing normal tissue exposure. In the current review, we discuss different LDTs and compare them with EBRT, specifically SABR. The emerging MRI-guided adaptive radiation therapy has been reviewed, highlighting its advantages and potential role in HCC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yirong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Brian Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA
| | - Amulya Yalamanchili
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Sara N Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Tarita O Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Iwasa T, Adachi S, Ogiso H, Takada E, Mabuchi M, Suzuki Y, Yamauchi O, Saito K, Iwashita T, Ogino H, Shimizu M. Severe skin ulcer caused by taking lenvatinib after proton beam therapy. Clin J Gastroenterol 2023:10.1007/s12328-023-01802-0. [PMID: 37147555 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-023-01802-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
A 69-year-old man was treated with lenvatinib after three sessions of proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinoma. Five months after administration of lenvatinib, a dermatitis with huge skin ulcer formed in the site of PBT irradiation. Lenvatinib was immediately withdrawn, but the skin ulcer continued growing until about 2 weeks later. With topical and antibiotic treatment, the skin ulcer resolved after about 4 months. After administration of lenvatinib, potential skin damage due to PBT at the irradiated site may have become apparent. This is the first report describing skin ulcer by the combination of lenvatinib administration and PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taisei Iwasa
- Department of Gastroenterology/Internal Medicine, Gihoku Kosei Hospital, Gifu-Seino Medical Center, 1187-3 Takatomi, Yamagata, 501-2105, Japan
| | - Seiji Adachi
- Department of Gastroenterology/Internal Medicine, Gihoku Kosei Hospital, Gifu-Seino Medical Center, 1187-3 Takatomi, Yamagata, 501-2105, Japan.
| | - Hideyuki Ogiso
- Department of Gastroenterology/Internal Medicine, Gihoku Kosei Hospital, Gifu-Seino Medical Center, 1187-3 Takatomi, Yamagata, 501-2105, Japan
| | - Eri Takada
- Department of Gastroenterology/Internal Medicine, Gihoku Kosei Hospital, Gifu-Seino Medical Center, 1187-3 Takatomi, Yamagata, 501-2105, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Mabuchi
- Department of Gastroenterology/Internal Medicine, Gihoku Kosei Hospital, Gifu-Seino Medical Center, 1187-3 Takatomi, Yamagata, 501-2105, Japan
| | - Yusuke Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology/Internal Medicine, Gihoku Kosei Hospital, Gifu-Seino Medical Center, 1187-3 Takatomi, Yamagata, 501-2105, Japan
| | - Osamu Yamauchi
- Department of Gastroenterology/Internal Medicine, Gihoku Kosei Hospital, Gifu-Seino Medical Center, 1187-3 Takatomi, Yamagata, 501-2105, Japan
| | - Koshiro Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology/Internal Medicine, Gihoku Kosei Hospital, Gifu-Seino Medical Center, 1187-3 Takatomi, Yamagata, 501-2105, Japan
| | - Takuji Iwashita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Hirate-Cho, Kita-Ku, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masahito Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wang L, Liu BX, Long HY. Ablative strategies for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2023; 15:515-524. [PMID: 37206650 PMCID: PMC10190693 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i4.515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and is the fifth leading cause of cancer death worldwide and the third leading cause of all diseases worldwide. Liver transplantation, surgical resection and ablation are the three main curative treatments for HCC. Liver transplantation is the optimal treatment option for HCC, but its usage is limited by the shortage of liver sources. Surgical resection is considered the first choice for early-stage HCC, but it does not apply to patients with poor liver function. Therefore, more and more doctors choose ablation for HCC. However, intrahepatic recurrence occurs in up to 70% patients within 5 years after initial treatment. For patients with oligo recurrence after primary treatment, repeated resection and local ablation are both alternative. Only 20% patients with recurrent HCC (rHCC) indicate repeated surgical resection because of limitations in liver function, tumor location and intraperitoneal adhesions. Local ablation has become an option for the waiting period when liver transplantation is unavailable. For patients with intrahepatic recurrence after liver transplantation, local ablation can reduce the tumor burden and prepare them for liver transplantation. This review systematically describes the various ablation treatments for rHCC, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, laser ablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation, cryablation, irreversible electroporation, percutaneous ethanol injection, and the combination of ablation and other treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Wang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Bao-Xian Liu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Hai-Yi Long
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gao YX, Ning QQ, Yang PX, Guan YY, Liu PX, Liu ML, Qiao LX, Guo XH, Yang TW, Chen DX. Recent advances in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. World J Hepatol 2023; 15:460-476. [PMID: 37206651 PMCID: PMC10190692 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i4.460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent form of primary liver cancer, accounting for 75%-85% of cases. Although treatments are given to cure early-stage HCC, up to 50%-70% of individuals may experience a relapse of the illness in the liver after 5 years. Research on the fundamental treatment modalities for recurrent HCC is moving significantly further. The precise selection of individuals for therapy strategies with established survival advantages is crucial to ensuring better outcomes. These strategies aim to minimize substantial morbidity, support good life quality, and enhance survival for patients with recurrent HCC. For individuals with recurring HCC after curative treatment, no approved therapeutic regimen is currently available. A recent study presented novel approaches, like immunotherapy and antiviral medication, to improve the prognosis of patients with recurring HCC with the apparent lack of data to guide the clinical treatment. The data supporting several neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies for patients with recurring HCC are outlined in this review. We also discuss the potential for future clinical and translational investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Xue Gao
- Beijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing You An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
- Beijing Precision Medicine and Transformation Engineering Technology Research Center of Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Beijing 100069, China
| | - Qi-Qi Ning
- Beijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing You An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
- Beijing Precision Medicine and Transformation Engineering Technology Research Center of Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Beijing 100069, China
| | - Peng-Xiang Yang
- Beijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing You An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
- Beijing Precision Medicine and Transformation Engineering Technology Research Center of Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Beijing 100069, China
| | - Yuan-Yue Guan
- Beijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing You An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
- Beijing Precision Medicine and Transformation Engineering Technology Research Center of Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Beijing 100069, China
| | - Peng-Xiang Liu
- Beijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing You An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
- Beijing Precision Medicine and Transformation Engineering Technology Research Center of Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Beijing 100069, China
| | - Meng-Lu Liu
- Beijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing You An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
- Beijing Precision Medicine and Transformation Engineering Technology Research Center of Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Beijing 100069, China
| | - Lu-Xin Qiao
- Beijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing You An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
- Beijing Precision Medicine and Transformation Engineering Technology Research Center of Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Beijing 100069, China
| | - Xiang-Hua Guo
- Beijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing You An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
- Beijing Precision Medicine and Transformation Engineering Technology Research Center of Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Beijing 100069, China
| | - Tong-Wang Yang
- Beijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing You An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
- Academician Workstation, Changsha Medical University, Changsha 410219, Hunan Province, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of the Research and Development of Novel Pharmaceutical Preparations, Changsha Medical University, Changsha 410219, Hunan Province, China
| | - De-Xi Chen
- Beijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing You An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
- Beijing Precision Medicine and Transformation Engineering Technology Research Center of Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Beijing 100069, China
| |
Collapse
|