Prospective evaluation of hospital isolation room capacity

Consequences of Migrating U.S. Contagious Facilities Into General Hospitals, 1900-1950

Until the 1880s, hospitals excluded contagious disease patients from admission because of the danger they posed to other patients; by the 1950s, contagious disease care had literally moved into the general hospital. This article correlates the changing isolation facility designs with changing disease incidence and prevention strategies. It argues that isolation moved into the hospital in stages that have consequence for isolation facility design today. Between the 1890s and 1940s, contagious disease care shifted from remote isolation hospitals (commonly known as pest houses) to separate contagious disease hospitals, to contagious disease "units" adjacent to or within a general hospital facility, and to isolation rooms included in nursing units. The architectural history of isolation facility designs shows that the integration of isolation facilities into general hospitals relied on the success of new aseptic nursing procedures that prevented contact transmission but which downgraded the need for spatial separation to prevent airborne transmission. In the second half of the 20th century, federal funding and standards made isolation rooms in the hospital the norm. This migration coincided with a historically unprecedented reduction in contagious disease incidence produced by successful vaccines and antibiotics. By the 1980s, the rise of new and antibiotic resistant diseases led to extensive redesigns of the in-house isolation rooms to make them more effective. This article suggests that it is time to rethink isolation not just at the detail level but in terms of its location in relation to the general hospital.

Impact of isolation on hospitalised patients who are infectious: systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature exploring the impact of isolation on hospitalised patients who are infectious: psychological and non-psychological outcomes.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Embase, Medline and PsycINFO were searched from inception until December 2018. Reference lists and Google Scholar were also handsearched.

RESULTS

Twenty-six papers published from database inception to December 2018 were reviewed. A wide range of psychological and non-psychological outcomes were reported. There was a marked trend for isolated patients to exhibit higher levels of depression, the pooled standardised mean difference being 1.28 (95% CI 0.47 to 2.09) and anxiety 1.45 (95% CI 0.56 to 2.34), although both had high levels of heterogeneity, and worse outcomes for a range of care-related factors but with significant variation.

CONCLUSION

The review indicates that isolation to contain the risk of infection has negative consequences for segregated patients. Although strength of the evidence is weak, comprising primarily single-centre convenience samples, consistency of the effects may strengthen this conclusion. More research needs to be undertaken to examine this relationship and develop and test interventions to reduce the negative effects of isolation.

Impact of isolation on hospitalised patients who are infectious: systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature exploring the impact of isolation on hospitalised patients who are infectious: psychological and non-psychological outcomes.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Embase, Medline and PsycINFO were searched from inception until December 2018. Reference lists and Google Scholar were also handsearched.

RESULTS

Twenty-six papers published from database inception to December 2018 were reviewed. A wide range of psychological and non-psychological outcomes were reported. There was a marked trend for isolated patients to exhibit higher levels of depression, the pooled standardised mean difference being 1.28 (95% CI 0.47 to 2.09) and anxiety 1.45 (95% CI 0.56 to 2.34), although both had high levels of heterogeneity, and worse outcomes for a range of care-related factors but with significant variation.

CONCLUSION

The review indicates that isolation to contain the risk of infection has negative consequences for segregated patients. Although strength of the evidence is weak, comprising primarily single-centre convenience samples, consistency of the effects may strengthen this conclusion. More research needs to be undertaken to examine this relationship and develop and test interventions to reduce the negative effects of isolation.

Chemical disinfectants: Controversies regarding their use in low risk healthcare environments (part 1)

In recent years, the number of disinfectants designed to decontaminate healthcare environments and reusable, non-invasive care equipment (NICE) has increased markedly, making the selection of the most appropriate disinfectant a somewhat daunting prospect. In addition to the microbial challenge, there are numerous factors to consider including: efficacy; range and speed of activity; stability of the ingredients; compatibility of the disinfectant with surfaces; inactivation of the disinfectant by organic matter; method of application; convenience; health and safety concerns; and cost. While the microbial challenge continues to evolve, and novel disinfectants continue to emerge, guidance updates have been notably absent. Most healthcare surfaces belong to a UK-defined category of 'low risk' for which guidance dictates 'cleaning and drying is usually sufficient'. This paper assesses the evidence and arguments regarding the use of disinfectants for low-risk healthcare surfaces. A novel subcategorisation of 'low risk' is presented to provide a more specific up-to-date disinfectant needs assessment.

Assessing the functionality of temporary isolation rooms

BACKGROUND

Challenges with limited single rooms and isolation facilities in hospitals have created an opportunity for temporary, portable isolation technology. This article describes the process used to evaluate the prototype of a new isolation room (RediRoom; CareStrategic Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia) that can be installed in existing hospital ward areas. Our aim is to assess the functionality of this new room, and in so doing, to evaluate the methods used.

METHODS

We employed a mixed-methods approach involving video recording, interviews, and objective temperature and humidity measurements within a crossover interventional study. Participants completed a range of clinical activities in the RediRoom and a control. The setting for the study was a clinical ward environment at an Australian higher education institution.

RESULTS

There were similarities between the RediRoom and the control using a range of measures. The time taken to complete a range of clinical activities in both rooms was broadly consistent. Network analysis also suggested broad similarities in the movement of nurses undertaking activities in both rooms.

CONCLUSION

Our study attempted to simulate a clinical environment and clinical activities and provide the best possible comparison by completing activities sequentially, with immediate feedback to researchers. Video recording added significant value to the process because it provided some objectivity. A form of reflexive ethnography with participants could be of value in similar studies in the future.

Reducing the number of missed isolation days in a paediatric high-dependency unit using semi-permanent pods

BACKGROUND

Single rooms are in short supply in many hospitals.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of introducing semi-permanent pods to convert multi-occupancy bays into single occupancy pods.

METHODS

We performed a 24-month pre-post observational study in a 15-bed paediatric high dependency unit. Three semi-permanent pods were installed in February 2013, in the middle of the 24-month period. The percentage of missed isolation days and the proportion of days for which >4 patients required isolation (which would exceed existing isolation facilities) were compared for the year prior to the pods with the first year of pod use using a Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Missed isolation days fell from 58.2% (662/1138; 95% confidence interval [CI], 55.3-61.0) pre-pod to 14.8% (205/1382; 95% CI, 13.0-16.8) during the first year of pod use (P <0.001). The percentage of days for which >4 patients required isolation was 74.5% overall (95% CI, 70.5-78.8), and increased from 63% (95% CI, 56.2-69.4) pre-Pod to 86% (95% CI, 80.9-90.3) during pod use (P <0.001).

DISCUSSION

The introduction of three semi-permanent pods was feasible in our paediatric HDU setting and reduced the number of missed isolation days, and hence transmission risk, for important hospital pathogens.

Single-room usage patterns and allocation decision-making in an Australian public hospital: a sequential exploratory study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aims are to (1) measure occupancy rates of single and shared rooms; (2) compare single room usage patterns and (3) explore the practice, rationale and decision-making processes associated with single rooms; across one Australian public health service.

BACKGROUND

There is a tendency in Australia and internationally to increase the proportion of single patient rooms in hospitals. To date there have been no Australian studies that investigate the use of single rooms in clinical practice.

DESIGN

This study used a sequential exploratory design with data collected in 2014.

METHODS

A descriptive survey was used to measure the use of single rooms across a two-week time frame. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with occupancy decision-makers to explore the practices, rationale decision-making process associated with single-room allocation.

RESULTS

Total bed occupancy did not fall below 99·4% during the period of data collection. Infection control was the primary reason for patients to be allocated to a single room, however, the patterns varied according to ward type and single-room availability. For occupancy decision-makers, decisions about patient allocation was a complex and challenging process, influenced and complicated by numerous factors including occupancy rates, the infection status of the patient/s, funding and patient/family preference. Bed moves were common resulting from frequent re-evaluation of need.

CONCLUSION

Apart from infection control mandates, there was little tangible evidence to guide decision-making about single-room allocation. Further work is necessary to assist nurses in their decision-making.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

There is a trend towards increasing the proportion of single rooms in new hospital builds. Coupled with the competing clinical demands for single room care, this study highlights the complexity of nursing decision-making about patient allocation to single rooms, an issue urgently requiring further attention.

Can rapid integrated polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostics for gastrointestinal pathogens improve routine hospital infection control practice? A diagnostic study

BACKGROUND

Every year approximately 5000-9000 patients are admitted to a hospital with diarrhoea, which in up to 90% of cases has a non-infectious cause. As a result, single rooms are 'blocked' by patients with non-infectious diarrhoea, while patients with infectious diarrhoea are still in open bays because of a lack of free side rooms. A rapid test for differentiating infectious from non-infectious diarrhoea could be very beneficial for patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate MassCode multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the simultaneous diagnosis of multiple enteropathogens directly from stool, in terms of sensitivity/specificity to detect four common important enteropathogens: Clostridium difficile, Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp. and norovirus.

DESIGN

A retrospective study of fixed numbers of samples positive for C. difficile (n = 200), Campylobacter spp. (n = 200), Salmonella spp. (n = 100) and norovirus (n = 200) plus samples negative for all these pathogens (n = 300). Samples were sourced from NHS microbiology laboratories in Oxford and Leeds where initial diagnostic testing was performed according to Public Health England methodology. Researchers carrying out MassCode assays were blind to this information. A questionnaire survey, examining current practice for infection control teams and microbiology laboratories managing infectious diarrhoea, was also carried out.

SETTING

MassCode assays were carried out at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust. Further multiplex assays, carried out using Luminex, were run on the same set of samples at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. The questionnaire was completed by various NHS trusts.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity and specificity to detect C. difficile, Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., and norovirus.

RESULTS

Nucleic acids were extracted from 948 clinical samples using an optimised protocol (200 Campylobacter spp., 199 C. difficile, 60 S. enterica, 199 norovirus and 295 negative samples; some samples contained more than one pathogen). Using the MassCode assay, sensitivities for each organism compared with standard microbiological testing ranged from 43% to 94% and specificities from 95% to 98%, with particularly poor performance for S. enterica. Relatively large numbers of unexpected positives not confirmed with quantitative PCR were also observed, particularly for S. enterica, Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium spp. As the results indicated that S. enterica detection might provide generic challenges to other multiplex assays for gastrointestinal pathogens, the Luminex xTag(®) gastrointestinal assay was also run blinded on the same extracts (937/948 remaining) and on re-extracted samples (839/948 with sufficient material). For Campylobacter spp., C. difficile and norovirus, high sensitivities (> 92%) and specificities (> 96%) were observed. For S. enterica, on the original MassCode/Oxford extracts, Luminex sensitivity compared with standard microbiological testing was 84% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73% to 93%], but this dropped to 46% on a fresh extract, very similar to MassCode, with a corresponding increase in specificity from 92% to 99%. Overall agreement on the per-sample diagnosis compared with combined microbiology plus PCR for the main four/all pathogens was 85.6%/64.7%, 87.0%/82.9% and 89.8%/86.8% for the MassCode assay, Luminex assay/MassCode extract and Luminex assay/fresh extract, respectively. Luminex assay results from fresh extracts implied that 5% of samples did not represent infectious diarrhoea, even though enteropathogens were genuinely present. Managing infectious diarrhoea was a significant burden for infection control teams (taking 21% of their time) and better diagnostics were identified as having major potential benefits for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the Luminex xTag gastrointestinal panel showed similar or superior sensitivity and specificity to the MassCode assay. However, on fresh extracts, this test had low sensitivity to detect a key enteric pathogen, S. enterica; making it an unrealistic option for most microbiology laboratories. Extraction efficiency appears to be a major obstacle for nucleic acid-based tests for this organism, and possibly the whole Enterobacteriaceae family. To improve workflows in service microbiology laboratories, to reduce workload for infection control practitioners, and to improve outcomes for NHS patients, further research on deoxyribonucleic acid-based multiplex gastrointestinal diagnostics is urgently needed.

FUNDING

The Health Technology Assessment programme of the National Institute for Health Research.

The strength of coughing may forecast the likelihood of spread of multi-drug resistant microorganisms from the respiratory tract of colonized patients

Background

Current recommendations indicate that patients who are coughing and have multidrug resistant microorganisms (MDROs) in their sputum are considered to be shedders and should be cared for in single room isolation at least until symptoms resolve. Airborne spread and subsequent contamination of surfaces adjacent to patients may contribute to transmission. Hence, isolation measures for patients colonized or infected with MDRO at their respiratory tract are intended to interrupt such transmission. However, the potential for microbial shedding in patients with MDRO-positive microbiological reports from their respiratory tract and factors justifying the need for single room isolation are viewed controversially.

Methods

Cough aerosol produced by patients colonized with MDROs was measured for viable counts. Descriptive analysis together with logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of strength of cough on growth of MDRO on culture plates.

Results

In 18% (23/128) MDRO were transmitted. Multivariate analysis revealed that strength of cough significantly predicts the yield of MDRO on culture plates (P = 0.012).

Conclusion

Based on these results it can be concluded that risk stratification for decision of single room isolation of patients colonized or infected with MDROs at their respiratory tract may also take the severity of cough into consideration. However, more work is required in order to assess the severity of cough objectively.

Design Research and the Globalization of Healthcare Environments

OBJECTIVE:

Global healthcare practice has expanded in the past 20 years. At the same time the incorporation of research into the design process has gained prominence as a best practice among architects. The authors of this study investigated the status of design research in a variety of international settings. We intended to answer the question, “how pervasive is healthcare design research outside of the United States?”

METHOD:

The authors reviewed the international literature on the design of healthcare facilities. More than 500 international studies and conference proceedings were incorporated in this literature review. A team of five research assistants searched multiple databases comparing approximately 16 keywords to geographic location. Some of those keywords included: evidence-based design, salutogenic design, design research, and healthcare environment. Additional articles were gathered by contacting prominent researchers and asking for their personal assessment of local health design research studies.

RESULTS:

While there are design researchers in most parts of the world, the majority of studies focus on the needs of populations in developed countries and generate guidelines that have significant cost and cultural implications that prohibit their implementation in developing countries. Additionally, the body of literature discussing the role of culture in healthcare environments is extremely limited.

CONCLUSION:

Design researchers must address the cultural implications of their studies. Additionally, we need to expand our research objectives to address healthcare design in countries that have not been previous considered.

Structure and function: planning a new ICU to optimize patient care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To survey the recent medical literature reporting effects of ICU design on patients' and family members' well being, safety and functionality.

RECENT FINDINGS

Features of ICU design linked to the needs of patients and their family are single rooms, privacy, quiet surrounding, exposure to daylight, views of nature, prevention of infection, a family area and open visiting hours. Other features such as safety, working procedures, ergonomics and logistics have a direct impact on the patient care and the nursing and medical personnel.

SUMMARY

An organization structured on the needs of the patient and their family is mandatory in designing a new ICU. The main aims in the design of a new department should be patient-centered care, safety, functionality, innovation and a future-proof concept.

MRSA prevention strategies and current guidelines

We review prevention strategies to minimise the risk of MRSA soft tissue and bone infections, which can be devastating for the patient and costly for the healthcare provider. Department of Health (England) policy is that screening for emergency admissions will be mandatory from 2011, in addition to existent elective admission screening. Rapid screening technology has not been shown to be cost-effective, meaning that there will be a lag time between admission and the patient's MRSA status being known. Thus, standard infection control policies regarding isolation of high-risk patients will remain, with a continuing focus on MRSA decolonisation, aimed at minimising the risks of auto-infection and transmission to other patients. Antimicrobial prescribing policies should be designed to take into account the local burden of resistant organisms, but also minimise unnecessary antibiotic use. There is an increasing realisation that reducing the use of fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins (which have been associated with increased carriage of MRSA) in patient populations where MRSA is prevalent can be a useful control measure. Prevention of orthopaedic infections clearly involves general operating theatre protocols, such as suitable antiseptic skin preparation, and additional measures including the use of laminar airflow. Antibiotic prophylaxis is adjusted in patients known to have MRSA to include a glycopeptide, and local guidelines may adopt such regimens for all patients due to the burden of MRSA in the local patient population. A future development that may have an effect on practice is the development of a Staphylococcus aureus vaccine, which has been shown to be cost-effective in a computer-modelled evaluation.

Isolation prioritization tool: revision, adaptation and application

The provision of single rooms for the care of patients who require isolation may not match the number required. Placing patients in isolation facilities may have an effect on their psychological wellbeing and the quality of care delivered. To ensure a rational and consistent approach to the prioritization of single room usage, an existing prioritization system was revised. This was validated by a group of experts and tested in an acute hospital. A simple short cut guide was developed and used.

Modelling the costs and effects of selective and universal hospital admission screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Background

Screening at hospital admission for carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been proposed as a strategy to reduce nosocomial infections. The objective of this study was to determine the long-term costs and health benefits of selective and universal screening for MRSA at hospital admission, using both PCR-based and chromogenic media-based tests in various settings.

Methodology/Principal Findings

A simulation model of MRSA transmission was used to determine costs and effects over 15 years from a US healthcare perspective. We compared admission screening together with isolation of identified carriers against a baseline policy without screening or isolation. Strategies included selective screening of high risk patients or universal admission screening, with PCR-based or chromogenic media-based tests, in medium (5%) or high nosocomial prevalence (15%) settings. The costs of screening and isolation per averted MRSA infection were lowest using selective chromogenic-based screening in high and medium prevalence settings, at $4,100 and $10,300, respectively. Replacing the chromogenic-based test with a PCR-based test costs $13,000 and $36,200 per additional infection averted, and subsequent extension to universal screening with PCR would cost $131,000 and $232,700 per additional infection averted, in high and medium prevalence settings respectively. Assuming $17,645 benefit per infection averted, the most cost-saving strategies in high and medium prevalence settings were selective screening with PCR and selective screening with chromogenic, respectively.

Conclusions/Significance

Admission screening costs $4,100–$21,200 per infection averted, depending on strategy and setting. Including financial benefits from averted infections, screening could well be cost saving.

[Isolation precautions in a tertiary paediatric hospital]

INTRODUCTION

Isolation is one of the measures to prevent the spread of nosocomial infections. However, in children's hospitals, given the type of patients and infections, and the architectural features of hospital wards, isolation precautions are sometimes difficult to implement and enforce.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An observational, descriptive study was conducted on the isolation precautions taken at the Children's Hospital Vall d'Hebron in Barcelona, from January to December, 2007. The isolation precautions applied were those of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from the USA, and those of the Department of Health of the Generalitat de Cataluña.

RESULTS

Of the patients admitted during the study period, 5.4% needed isolation. The General Paediatrics ward generated the highest number of isolations (10.7%). The most frequently microorganisms needing isolation precautions were respiratory syncytial virus and rotavirus. Contact precautions was the type of isolation most applied (90% of isolations). The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and the Paediatric Oncology and Haematology Service were the areas with a greater number of patients isolated due to infection or colonization by multiresistant bacteria (48% and 67% of the isolations, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a surveillance and infection control program is essential to reduce the rate of hospital-acquired infections. Knowledge of the frequency of isolated patients at each centre and the availability of resources for the correct application of isolation precautions are fundamental for these goals to be achieved.

Recent initiatives to reduce the spread of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Recent initiatives have achieved marked reductions in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemias. However, the relative effectiveness of prevention interventions is unclear. Initiatives to control meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus have tended to ignore the benefits of altering antimicrobial prescribing.

Reviewing the efficacy of infection control isolation

As part of a package of measures aimed at preventing cross-infection the isolation of patients in single rooms or through cohort nursing is a well-documented policy. However, the evidence base for an isolation policy is unclear it can cause logistical problems through inadequate resources and may result in physical, psychological and social harm to patients. Notwithstanding these problems, isolation can be said to have a practical utility in that it may impact on a nurses behaviour as they enact compliance as part of their infection control duties. It is nevertheless important for policymakers to note that it is not the location of the patient per se that is of primary importance in the transmission of contact spread organisms, but the behaviour of staff within the isolated environment.

Screening for MRSA

Rapid screening is no more effective at reducing acquisition than conventional screening

A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Healthcare Design

Objective:

This report surveys and evaluates the scientific research on evidence-based healthcare design and extracts its implications for designing better and safer hospitals.

Background:

It builds on a literature review conducted by researchers in 2004.

Methods:

Research teams conducted a new and more exhaustive search for rigorous empirical studies that link the design of hospital physical environments with healthcare outcomes. The review followed a two-step process, including an extensive search for existing literature and a screening of each identified study for the relevance and quality of evidence.

Results:

This review found a growing body of rigorous studies to guide healthcare design, especially with respect to reducing the frequency of hospital-acquired infections. Results are organized according to three general types of outcomes: patient safety, other patient outcomes, and staff outcomes. The findings further support the importance of improving outcomes for a range of design characteristics or interventions, including single-bed rooms rather than multibed rooms, effective ventilation systems, a good acoustic environment, nature distractions and daylight, appropriate lighting, better ergonomic design, acuity-adaptable rooms, and improved floor layouts and work settings. Directions for future research are also identified.

Conclusions:

The state of knowledge of evidence-based healthcare design has grown rapidly in recent years. The evidence indicates that well-designed physical settings play an important role in making hospitals safer and more healing for patients, and better places for staff to work.