Time-series analysis to observe the impact of a centrally organized educational intervention on the prevention of central-line-associated bloodstream infections in 32 German intensive care units

Knowledge and Practices Regarding Prevention of Central Venous Catheter Removal-Associated Air Embolism: A Survey of Nonintensive Care Unit Medical and Nursing Staff

INTRODUCTION

Air embolism is a potentially serious complication of central venous catheter (CVC) use. While CVC insertion is usually performed by a trained specialist, extraction is frequently the responsibility of junior staff members. This complication can be easily prevented by following several simple measures described in common guidelines.

AIM

We conducted a single-center survey to assess knowledge and practices concerning the prevention of air embolism associated with CVC removal among healthcare workers from nonintensive care units.

METHODS

The correct answers to the questionnaire were determined according to best-practice recommendations for CVC removal. Based on a comparison of the total sum of correct answers between the categories of groups, factors that predicted the level of knowledge were identified using an independent sample t test.

RESULTS

Of the 156 respondents, one-third were unfamiliar with air embolism as a complication of CVC extraction. Almost 80% were unaware of the existence of a CVC removal protocol. Almost half of respondents did not follow guidelines regarding patient position when removing a CVC, 72% did not ask the patient to perform the Valsalva maneuver during the procedure, and 54% did not ask the patient to remain supine after the procedure. Adherence to the protocol was correlated with professional experience, with a lower level among those with experience of less than 1 year and, particularly, among interns.

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey revealed inappropriately low awareness of CVC removal-associated air embolism risk and low familiarity with CVC removal best-practice recommendations among nonintensive care unit healthcare workers. Staff members with experience of less than 1 year, including interns, were found to have a lower level of knowledge. These findings emphasize the importance of development and distribution an internal hospital protocol and the integration of educational intervention into a preliminary internship program.

Effectiveness of national and subnational interventions for prevention and control of health-care-associated infections in acute hospitals in high-income and upper-middle-income counties: a systematic review update

This systematic review, commissioned and funded by WHO, aimed to update a review of infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions at a national level to inform a review of their IPC Core Components guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42021297376). CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and WHO IRIS were searched for studies meeting Cochrane's Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) design criteria, published from April 19, 2017, to Oct 14, 2021. Primary research studies examining national IPC interventions in acute hospitals in any country with outcomes related to rates of health-care-associated infections were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed quality using the EPOC risk of bias criteria. 36 studies were categorised per intervention type and synthesised narratively: care bundles (n=2), care bundles with implementation strategies (n=9), IPC programmes (n=16), and regulations (n=9). Designs included 21 interrupted time-series, nine controlled before-and-after studies, four cluster-randomised trials, and two non-randomised trials. Evidence supports the effectiveness of care bundles with implementation strategies. However, evidence for IPC programmes and regulations was inconclusive as studies were heterogeneous regarding populations, interventions, and outcomes. The overall risk of bias was high. Recommendations include the involvement of implementation strategies in care bundles and for further research on national IPC interventions with robust study designs and in low-income and middle-income settings.

Impact of intensified prevention measures on rates of hospital-acquired bloodstream infection in medical-surgical intensive care units, Israel, 2011 to 2019

BackgroundCentral line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is among the most common preventable infectious complications in patients in intensive care units (ICU). In 2011, the Israel National Center for Infection Control initiated a nationwide CLABSI prevention programme.AimTo evaluate the impact of different components of the programme on CLABSI and non-CLABSI rates in medical-surgical ICUs.MethodsWe included data collected from all 29 medical-surgical ICUs in Israel from November 2011 to December 2019. The study period was divided into three phases: I (baseline, initial CLABSI prevention guidelines introduced, initial feedback on rates provided), II (initial guidelines widely implemented, surveillance undertaken, feedback continued) and III (after implementation of additional prevention measures). Interrupted time series analysis was used to compare CLABSI and non-CLABSI rates during the three phases.ResultsThe pooled mean (SD) incidence of CLABSI per 1,000 central line-days dropped from 7.4 (0.38) in phase I to 2.1 (0.13) in phase III (p < 0.001). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.51-0.79) between phases I and II, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.59-1.02) between phases II and III. The pooled mean (SD) incidence of non-CLABSI per 1,000 patient-days declined from 5.3 (0.24) in phase I to 3.4 (0.13) in phase III (p < 0.001).ConclusionNational CLABSI prevention guidelines, surveillance and feedback resulted in significant reductions in CLABSI and non-CLABSI rates. In the wake of further interventions, significant reduction was achieved in ICUs reporting improvement in the uptake of additional prevention measures.

Central line-associated bloodstream infections, multidrug-resistant bacteraemias and infection control interventions: a six-year time-series analysis in a tertiary-care hospital in Greece

BACKGROUND

Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are serious healthcare-associated infections with substantial morbidity and hospital costs.

AIM

To investigate the association between the incidence of CLABSI, the implementation of specific infection control measures, and the incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteraemias in a tertiary-care hospital in Greece from 2013-2018.

METHODS

Analysis was applied for the following monthly calculated indices: 1.CLABSI rate, 2.use of hand hygiene disinfectants, 3.isolation rate of patients with MDR bacteria, 4.incidence of bacteraemias [total resistant Gram-negative: carbapenem-resistant (CR) Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and/or Gram-positive: meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci].

FINDINGS

Total bacteraemias from CR-Gram-negative pathogens statistically correlated with increased CLABSI rate in total Hospital Departments (IRR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.05-1.31, p-value: 0.006) and Adults ICU (IRR: 1.37, 95%CI: 1.07-1.75, p-value: 0.013). In Adults ICU, every increase in the incidence of each resistant Gram-negative pathogen significantly correlated with decreased CLABSI rate (CR-A. baumanii: IRR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.39-0.90, p-value=0.015; CR-K. pneumoniae: IRR: 0.48, 95%CI: 0.25-0.94, p-value=0.031; CR-P. aeruginosa: IRR: 0.54, 95%CI: 0.33-0.89, p-value=0.015). The use of hand disinfectants correlated with decreased CLABSI rate 1-3 months before the application of this intervention, in total Hospital Departments (IRR: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.69-0.93, p-value: 0.005), and for scrub disinfectants the current month in Adults ICU (IRR: 0.34, 95%CI: 0.11-1.03, p-value: 0.057). Isolation of patients with MDR pathogens was not associated with CLABSI incidence.

CONCLUSION

Hand hygiene was associated with a significant reduction of CLABSI incidence in our hospital. Time-series analysis is an important tool to evaluate infection control interventions.

Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections Through Educational Interventions in Adult Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review

Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) represent a severe systemic threat to patients admitted in ICUs and contribute to increased mortality, prolonged length of stay in ICUs, and increased costs. The majority of CLABSIs are preventable. The current systematic review aimed to investigate the effectiveness of educational methods on CLABSI rates in adult ICUs. A systematic literature search was conducted using the electronic databases of Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Plus, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies published from the beginning of 1995 to March 2020. The terms used for the search were as follows: central venous catheters, infection, central line-associated bloodstream infections, intensive care unit, and education intervention in all possible combinations and using the word 'and' between them. Data were extracted independently and crosschecked by two authors using a standard data collection form. The quality of the studies included in the review was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS). The current systematic review included 27 interventional studies of central line insertion or maintenance or both in adult ICU settings with documentation of the CLABSI incidence expressed per 1,000 catheter days. A large deviation between the length of time and type of educational interventions was found. Statistical significance was found in all studies (except one) in terms of CLABSI reduction despite the large variation of the length or the type of the educational intervention. Continuing education on infection prevention may be necessary to maintain the post-intervention results and improve clinical outcomes.

Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines management of intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit

The French Society of Intensive Care Medicine (SRLF), jointly with the French-Speaking Group of Paediatric Emergency Rooms and Intensive Care Units (GFRUP) and the French-Speaking Association of Paediatric Surgical Intensivists (ADARPEF), worked out guidelines for the management of central venous catheters (CVC), arterial catheters and dialysis catheters in intensive care unit. For adult patients: Using GRADE methodology, 36 recommendations for an improved catheter management were produced by the 22 experts. Recommendations regarding catheter-related infections’ prevention included the preferential use of subclavian central vein (GRADE 1), a one-step skin disinfection(GRADE 1) using 2% chlorhexidine (CHG)-alcohol (GRADE 1), and the implementation of a quality of care improvement program. Antiseptic- or antibiotic-impregnated CVC should likely not be used (GRADE 2, for children and adults). Catheter dressings should likely not be changed before the 7th day, except when the dressing gets detached, soiled or impregnated with blood (GRADE 2− adults). CHG dressings should likely be used (GRADE 2+). For adults and children, ultrasound guidance should be used to reduce mechanical complications in case of internal jugular access (GRADE 1), subclavian access (Grade 2) and femoral venous, arterial radial and femoral access (Expert opinion). For children, an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach of the brachiocephalic vein was recommended to reduce the number of attempts for cannulation and mechanical complications. Based on scarce publications on diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and on their experience (expert opinion), the panel proposed definitions, and therapeutic strategies.

Practice Guidelines for Central Venous Access 2020

These practice guidelines update the Practice Guidelines for Central Venous Access: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access, adopted by the American Society of Anesthesiologists in 2011 and published in 2012. These updated guidelines are intended for use by anesthesiologists and individuals under the supervision of an anesthesiologist and may also serve as a resource for other physicians, nurses, or healthcare providers who manage patients with central venous catheters.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

The association between implementation of second-tier prevention practices and CLABSI incidence: A national survey

BACKGROUND

Prevention of central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) represents a complex challenge for the teams involved in device insertion and maintenance. First-tier practices for CLABSI prevention are well established.

OBJECTIVE

We describe second-tier prevention practices in Israeli medical-surgical ICUs and assess their association with CLABSI rates.

METHODS

In June 2017, an online survey assessing infection prevention practices in general ICUs was sent to all Israeli acute-care hospitals. The survey comprised 14 prevention measures supplementary to the established measures that are standard of care for CLABSI prevention. These measures fall into 2 domains: technology and implementation. The association between the number of prevention measures and CLABSI rate during the first 6 months of 2017 was assessed using Spearman's correlation. We used negative binomial regression to calculate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) associated with the overall number of prevention measures and with each measure individually.

RESULTS

The CLABSI rates in 24 general ICUs varied between 0.0 and 17.0 per 1,000 central-line days. Greater use of preventive measures was associated with lower CLABSI rates (ρ, -0.70; P < .001). For each additional measure, the incidence of CLABSI decreased by 19% (IRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.89). Specific measures associated with lower rates were involvement of ward champions (IRR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31-0.71), auditing of insertions by infection control staff (IRR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.19-0.64), and simulation-based training (IRR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.22-0.64).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of second-tier preventive practices was protective against CLABSI. Use of more practices was correlated with lower rates.

Review of Strategies to Reduce Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) and Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) in Adult ICUs

Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) are costly and morbid. Despite evidence-based guidelines, Some intensive care units (ICUs) continue to have elevated infection rates. In October 2015, we performed a systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature within the PubMed and Cochrane databases for interventions to reduce CLABSI and/or CAUTI in adult ICUs and synthesized findings using a narrative review process. The interventions were categorized using a conceptual model, with stages applicable to both CAUTI and CLABSI prevention: (stage 0) avoid catheter if possible, (stage 1) ensure aseptic placement, (stage 2) maintain awareness and proper care of catheters in place, and (stage 3) promptly remove unnecessary catheters. We also looked for effective components that the 5 most successful (by reduction in infection rates) studies of each infection shared. Interventions that addressed multiple stages within the conceptual model were common in these successful studies. Assuring compliance with infection prevention efforts via auditing and timely feedback were also common. Hospitalists with patient safety interests may find this review informative for formulating quality improvement interventions to reduce these infections.

Effectiveness of national and subnational infection prevention and control interventions in high-income and upper-middle-income countries: a systematic review

Evidence-based guidance for national infection prevention and control (IPC) programmes is needed to support national and global capacity building to reduce health-care-associated infection and antimicrobial resistance. In this systematic review we investigate evidence on the effectiveness of IPC interventions implemented at national or subnational levels to inform the development of WHO guidelines on the core components of national IPC programmes. We searched CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and WHO IRIS databases for publications between Jan 1, 2000, and April 19, 2017. 29 studies that met the eligibility criteria (ie, economic evaluations, cluster-randomised trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-and-after studies, and interrupted time-series studies exploring the effective of these interventions) were categorised according to intervention type: multimodal, care bundles, policies, and surveillance, monitoring, and feedback. Evidence of effectiveness was found in all categories but the best quality evidence was on multimodal interventions and surveillance, monitoring, and feedback. We call for improvements in study design, reporting of research, and quality of evidence particularly from low-income countries, to strengthen the uptake and international relevance of IPC interventions.

Core components for effective infection prevention and control programmes: new WHO evidence-based recommendations

Health care-associated infections (HAI) are a major public health problem with a significant impact on morbidity, mortality and quality of life. They represent also an important economic burden to health systems worldwide. However, a large proportion of HAI are preventable through effective infection prevention and control (IPC) measures. Improvements in IPC at the national and facility level are critical for the successful containment of antimicrobial resistance and the prevention of HAI, including outbreaks of highly transmissible diseases through high quality care within the context of universal health coverage. Given the limited availability of IPC evidence-based guidance and standards, the World Health Organization (WHO) decided to prioritize the development of global recommendations on the core components of effective IPC programmes both at the national and acute health care facility level, based on systematic literature reviews and expert consensus. The aim of the guideline development process was to identify the evidence and evaluate its quality, consider patient values and preferences, resource implications, and the feasibility and acceptability of the recommendations. As a result, 11 recommendations and three good practice statements are presented here, including a summary of the supporting evidence, and form the substance of a new WHO IPC guideline.

Central-Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Québec Intensive Care Units: Results from the Provincial Healthcare-Associated Infections Surveillance Program (SPIN)

BACKGROUND Following implementation of bundled practices in 2009 in Quebec and Canadian intensive care units (ICUs), we describe CLABSI epidemiology during the last 8 years in the province of Québec (Canada) and compare rates with Canadian and American benchmarks. METHODS CLABSI incidence rates (IRs) and central venous catheter utilization ratios (CVCURs) by year and ICU type were calculated using 2007-2014 data from the Surveillance Provinciale des Infections Nosocomiales (SPIN) program. Using American and Canadian surveillance data, we compared SPIN IRs to rates in other jurisdictions using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). RESULTS In total, 1,355 lab-confirmed CLABSIs over 911,205 central venous catheter days (CVC days) were recorded. The overall pooled incidence rate (IR) was 1.49 cases per 1,000 CVC days. IRs for adult teaching ICUs, nonteaching ICUs, neonatal ICUs (NICUs), and pediatric ICUs (PICUs) were 1.04, 0.91, 4.20, and 2.15 cases per 1,000 CVC days, respectively. Using fixed SPIN 2007-2009 benchmarks, CLABSI rates had decreased significantly in all ICUs except for PICUs by 2014. Rates declined by 55% in adult teaching ICUs, 52% in adult nonteaching ICUs, and 38% in NICUs. Using dynamic American and Canadian CLABSI rates as benchmarks, SPIN adult teaching ICU rates were significantly lower and adult nonteaching ICUs had lower or comparable rates, whereas NICU and PICU rates were higher. CONCLUSION Québec ICU CLABSI surveillance shows declining CLABSI rates in adult ICUs. The absence of a decrease in CLABSI rate in NICUs and PICUs highlights the need for continued surveillance and analysis of factors contributing to higher rates in these populations. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1-9.

Surveillance of bloodstream infections in pediatric cancer centers - what have we learned and how do we move on?

Pediatric patients receiving conventional chemotherapy for malignant disease face an increased risk of bloodstream infection (BSI). Since BSI may represent an acute life-threatening event in patients with profound immunosuppression, and show further negative impact on quality of life and anticancer treatment, the prevention of BSI is of paramount importance to improve and guarantee patients' safety during intensive treatment. The great majority of all pediatric cancer patients (about 85%) have a long-term central venous access catheter in use (type Broviac or Port; CVAD). Referring to the current surveillance definitions a significant proportion of all BSI in pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia is categorized as CVAD-associated BSI. This state of the art review summarizes the epidemiology and the distinct pathogen profile of BSI in pediatric cancer patients from the perspective of infection surveillance. Problems in executing the current surveillance definition in this patient population are discussed and a new concept for the surveillance of BSI in pediatric cancer patients is outlined.

Effectiveness of insertion and maintenance bundles to prevent central-line-associated bloodstream infections in critically ill patients of all ages: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are a major problem in intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. We aimed to quantify the effectiveness of central-line bundles (insertion or maintenance or both) to prevent these infections.

METHODS

We searched Embase, MEDLINE OvidSP, Web-of-Science, and Cochrane Library to identify studies reporting the implementation of central-line bundles in adult ICU, paediatric ICU (PICU), or neonatal ICU (NICU) patients. We searched for studies published between Jan 1, 1990, and June 30, 2015. For the meta-analysis, crude estimates of infections were pooled by use of a DerSimonian and Laird random effect model. The primary outcome was the number of CLABSIs per 1000 catheter-days before and after implementation. Incidence risk ratios (IRRs) were obtained by use of random-effects models.

FINDINGS

We initially identified 4337 records, and after excluding duplicates and those ineligible, 96 studies met the eligibility criteria, 79 of which contained sufficient information for a meta-analysis. Median CLABSIs incidence were 5·7 per 1000 catheter-days (range 1·2-46·3; IQR 3·1-9·5) on adult ICUs; 5·9 per 1000 catheter-days (range 2·6-31·1; 4·8-9·4) on PICUs; and 8·4 per 1000 catheter-days (range 2·6-24·1; 3·7-16·0) on NICUs. After implementation of central-line bundles the CLABSI incidence ranged from 0 to 19·5 per 1000 catheter-days (median 2·6, IQR 1·2-4·4) in all types of ICUs. In our meta-analysis the incidence of infections decreased significantly from median 6·4 per 1000 catheter-days (IQR 3·8-10·9) to 2·5 per 1000 catheter-days (1·4-4·8) after implementation of bundles (IRR 0·44, 95% CI 0·39-0·50, p<0·0001; I(2)=89%).

INTERPRETATION

Implementation of central-line bundles has the potential to reduce the incidence of CLABSIs.

FUNDING

None.