Distal radius fracture management in elderly patients: a literature review

Serial Range of Motion and Grip Strength Measurements, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Radiographic Thresholds Associated With Less Satisfactory Outcomes After Low-Energy Distal Radius Fracture in Women Aged 50 Years and Older

PURPOSE

To document the change of clinical (wrist motion and grip strength) measurements and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores at 9 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after distal radius fracture (DRF) in women 50 years and older with exclusively isolated, displaced, and low-energy DRFs treated by either closed and/or open reduction and to relate these outcomes to their radiographic results.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-institution cohort study, patients' post-DRF clinical measurements and PRWE scores were prospectively collected from December 2007 through September 2018 and stratified according to their final radiographic values of volar/dorsal tilt, ulnar variance, and radial inclination.

RESULTS

Of the 1,319 women identified, 1,126 (85%) were treated nonsurgically, and 193 (15%) were treated operatively. At 12 months, patients averaged restoration (ratio of injured and uninjured sides' values) of 96% pronation, 95% extension, 91% supination, 81% flexion, and 80% (77% nondominant, 85% dominant) grip strength. The mean PRWE score was 39.5 at week 9 and 14.4 at 12 months with 54% of patients scoring <10 and 13% scoring zero. The mean volar/dorsal tilt, ulnar variance, and radial inclination values in those treated nonsurgically were 1.4° dorsal, +3.9 mm, and 18.0°, respectively. Analogous values in patients treated surgically were 6° volar, +2.6 mm, and 22°, respectively. Volar tilt ≥25°, dorsal tilt >10°, ulnar variance >+7.5 mm, and radial inclination ≤13° were thresholds beyond which motion and grip strength were reduced and/or PRWE scores increased. In general, older patients experienced more residual deformity and were less likely to have undergone surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Generally, outcomes were satisfactory for patients with radiographic results within identified thresholds for acceptable fracture reduction. Outcomes were significantly less favorable for patients with radiographic results beyond these thresholds; for these patients, early surgical intervention should be considered. Low-energy DRFs should prompt bone density investigation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic 2b.

The Effect of Age and Sex on Early Postoperative Outcomes after Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

Background: We aim to evaluate the impact of advanced age and sex on postoperative complications and radiographic outcomes after open reduction with internal fixation of distal radius fractures (DRF). Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review, including all patients who underwent open reduction with internal fixation of a DRF between 2012 and 2018 at a single level 1 trauma centre. We recorded patient age, sex, fracture classification (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association [AO/OTA]), time from injury to surgical date, surgical duration, diabetes status, tobacco use, illicit drug use, history of osteoporosis, use of adjuvants, fixation type, postoperative radiographic restoration of normal parameters and early complications including loss of reduction within 30 days postoperatively. Advanced age was defined as age greater than 60 years. Results: A total of 521 patients underwent operative treatment - 264 males and 257 females. Males were twice as likely (23.5% vs. 10.1%; p < 0.0001) to sustain a type C3 fracture and be treated with a wrist spanning plate (5.3% vs. 0; p < 0.0001). A larger percentage of elderly patients undergoing operative treatment of DRF were female (20.2% vs. 5.7%; p < 0.0001) and females were more likely to carry a pre-injury diagnosis of osteoporosis (9.3% vs. 0%; p < 0.0001). And 100% of the elderly patients received were treated with a volar plate. The overall early loss of reduction was 7.5%. The overall complication rate was 8.2%. No differences in early postoperative complications were identified between sexes or age groups. Neither female sex nor advanced age was found to have increased risk of postoperative complications or early loss of reduction. Similar postoperative radiographic parameter measurements were obtained across groups as well. Conclusions: Our results support the idea that operative treatment of unstable DRF in elderly patients and women is a reasonable treatment option without significant increases in early postoperative complications. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic III).

Impact of an Outpatient Fracture Liaison Service on Osteoporosis Evaluation Among Patients With Upper Extremity Fragility Fracture

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of implementation of an outpatient fracture liaison service (FLS) on completion rates of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and screening labs including 25-OH vitamin D and parathyroid hormone (PTH) in patients with upper extremity (UE) fragility fractures.

METHODS

At our institution, 367 patients were treated in 2014-2015 for UE fragility fractures of the distal radius and proximal humerus before implementation of our outpatient FLS and 395 patients in 2017-2018 after implementation. Retrospective chart review was conducted to identify completed DXA scans within 2 years of fracture treatment and completed 25-OH vitamin D and PTH labs within 1 year of fracture treatment.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences in the demographics of patients treated for distal radial and proximal humeral fragility fractures during the 2014-2015 and 2017-2018 time periods. Implementation of the FLS resulted in a 9.9% increase (P value = .021) in completed DXA scans within 2 years of fracture treatment. Completed 25-OH vitamin D and PTH labs saw a significant increase of 17.1% and 23.8%, respectively (P values < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an outpatient FLS can help to improve osteoporosis evaluation with completed DXA scans and 25-OH vitamin D and PTH labs.

The ageless approach: Nonoperative mastery competes head-on with surgery for elderly distal radius fractures

The aim of the current study is to compare the clinical outcomes of cast immobilization (CI) versus surgical treatment after 1 year for distal radius fractures (DRFs) in the elderly population. The cohort included patients aged 70-89 who suffered an acute, closed, and displaced DRF and who were treated conservatively or surgically at our clinic between August 2018 and January 2022. Those who had pathological fractures, open fractures, concomitant ulna fractures (except ulna styloid fractures), were not between the ages of 70 and 89, or refused to participate were excluded from the study. The study gathered data on patient demographics, initial radiological measurements, clinical measurements after 1 year, treatment models employed, and rates of complications. Of the total number of patients (276), CI was used on 77.2% (213), whereas the other 25 had volar-locked plates (VLP), 25 received external fixators with percutaneous pinning (EFPP), and 13 had isolated percutaneous pinning (IPP). 19 of 276 individuals had complications, with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome being the most often documented. EFPP resulted in significantly higher Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score values than VLP and IPP at the 1st postoperative year (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the DASH score and ROM values at the 1st postoperative year for patients who received CI versus those who underwent surgery (p > 0.05). In the first postoperative year, CI still retains its validity and performs similarly to surgery for DRFs in older individuals. VLPP and IPP methods outperformed EFPP surgeries.

Analysis of Postoperative Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes in the Setting of Osteopenia and Osteoporosis for Patients with Comorbid Conditions

Purpose

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are among the most common orthopedic injuries, especially in the elderly. A wide variety of approaches have been advocated as successful treatment modalities; yet, there remains variability in practice patterns of DRF in patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia. Using large data set analysis, we sought to determine the risk profile of operative fixation of DRF in patients with low bone mineral density.

Methods

A commercially available health care database, PearlDiver, was queried for all patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation of DRFs between 2010 and 2020. The study population was divided into groups based on the presence or absence of osteopenia or osteoporosis and was further classified by patients who were receiving bisphosphonate therapy. Complication rates were calculated, including rates of malunion, surgical site infection, osteomyelitis, hardware failure, and hardware removal. Five-year future fragility fractures were defined in hip, vertebrae, humerus, and wrist fractures. Chi-square analysis and logistic regression were performed to determine an association between these comorbidities and various postoperative complications.

Results

A total of 152,926 patients underwent open reduction internal fixation of a DRF during the study period. Chi-square analysis of major complications at 3 months showed a statistically significant increase in malunion in patients with osteopenia (P = .05) and patients with osteoporosis (P = .05) who underwent open reduction internal fixation. Logistic regression analysis at 12 months after surgery demonstrated that osteopenia was associated with an increased risk of hardware failure (P < .0001), hardware removal (P < .0001), surgical site infection (P < .0001), and malunion (P = .004). Osteoporosis was associated with a significantly increased risk of hardware failure (P = .01), surgical site infection (P < .0001), and malunion (P < .0001).

Conclusions

We demonstrated, using large data set analysis, that DRF patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis are predicted to be at increased risk of multiple postoperative complications, and thus, bone density should be strongly considered in treatment planning for these patients.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic III.

Effectiveness of surgical versus conservative treatment of distal radius fractures in elderly patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine whether surgical treatment is more effective than conservative treatment in terms of functional outcomes in elderly patients with distal radius fractures (DRFs).

METHODS

An electronic search of the Medline, Central, Embase, PEDro, Lilacs, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases was performed, from inception until July 2021. The eligibility criteria for selecting studies were randomized clinical trials that compared surgical versus conservative treatment in subjects older than 60 years with DRFs. Two authors independently performed the search, data extraction, and assessed risk of bias (RoB) using the Cochrane RoB tool.

RESULTS

Twelve trials met the eligibility criteria, and nine studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. For volar plate versus cast immobilization at 1-year follow-up, the mean difference (MD) for PRWE was -5.36 points (p=0.02), for DASH was -4.03 points (p=0.02), for grip strength was 8.32% (p=0.0004), for wrist flexion was 4.35 degrees (p=0.10), for wrist extension was -1.52 degrees (p=0.008), for pronation was 2.7 degrees (p=0.009), for supination was 4.88 degrees (p=0.002), and for EQ-VAS was 2.73 points (p=0.0007), with differences in favor of volar plate. For K-wire versus cast immobilization at 12 months, there were no statistically significant differences in wrist range of motion (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There was low to high evidence according to GRADE ratings, with a statistically significant difference in functional outcomes in favor of volar plate versus conservative treatment at 1-year follow-up. However, these differences are not minimally clinically important, suggesting that both types of management are equally effective in patients older than 60 years with DRFs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I; Therapeutic (Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials).

Magnitude, Direction, Temporal Patterns, and Frequency of Loss of Distal Radius Fracture Reduction in Women 50 Years and Older

PURPOSE

To determine the magnitude, direction, temporal patterns, and frequency of reduction loss following nonsurgical, closed treatment of distal radius fractures in women 50 years and older and correlate these observations with bone mineral density and age.

METHODS

We reviewed registry data on 1,148 patients 50 years and older with distal radius fractures managed by closed reduction and cast immobilization. Radial inclination (RI), ulnar variance (UV), and radial tilt (RT) were measured immediately and at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks after reduction. Magnitude, direction, frequency, and patterns of change were compared at each time point and correlated with bone mineral density T-scores and age using paired t tests in a mixed effects model.

RESULTS

Over 12 weeks, RI decreased by 3° ± 5°, the majority occurring in the first 2 weeks and significantly correlated with bone mineral density T-score and age. Unexpectedly, RI increased over time in 5% of patients. Ulnar variance increased by 2.3 ± 1.7 mm, the majority occurring in the first 3 weeks and correlated with age. Radial tilt changed by 7° ± 11° in those displacing dorsally and 8° ± 12° in those displacing volarly at 12 weeks, with the majority occurring in the first 3 weeks and significantly correlating with age. Ulnar variance and RT continued to change by small increments between weeks 3 and 6. Nearly 90% of our cohort experienced measurable loss of reduction and 50% changed at least 5° RI, 11° RT, and 2 mm UV.

CONCLUSIONS

Most distal radius fracture managed with closed reduction and casting have some loss of reduction, the majority occurring in the first 3 weeks and correlated with increased age and osteoporosis. This guides clinicians in informing patients about expected reduction loss, frequency of clinical and radiographic follow-up, and timing of discussions regarding the need for surgery.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

"Age Is Just a Number": Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 75

Background: Management of distal radius fractures in patients over 65 is a topic of significant study, but there are variations within this group in terms of independence and activity level. This study compares the outcomes of operative distal radius fracture treatment in patients over 75 with those aged 65 to 74, to evaluate the effects of patient demand and advanced age on outcome. Methods: A retrospective review of a single-institution distal radius fracture database was performed. All patients over age 65 were evaluated for inclusion. Patient factors including activity, independence level, and quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) score were recorded. Patients were selected for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) based on a discussion between the patient and the treating surgeon. Outcome measures including QuickDASH were recorded at 1-year post-injury. Patients aged 65 to 74 and 75 and over were compared to evaluate for demographic, functional, and outcome differences. Results: In all, 75 patients were included in the study. Fifty-one patients were aged 65 to 74, and 24 patients were aged over 75. The majority of patients rated themselves as "completely independent" and "active," the highest levels of each. There was no difference in QuickDASH scores between those patients who rated themselves as completely partially independent, or active versus moderately active. There was no statistically significant difference in QuickDASH or range of motion parameters at final follow-up. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that, in a group of patients with high levels of independence and activity, outcomes are similar in patients aged 65 to 74 and over 75 at 1 year following distal radius ORIF.

Locking versus nonlocking superior plate fixations for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: A prospective randomized trial comparing clinical and radiografic results

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether locking or nonlocking superior plate fixation is better for managing displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Therefore, we aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of locking and nonlocking superior plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

METHODS

A total of 102 consecutive patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (2B1 and 2B2 in Robinson classification) participated in this randomized controlled trial; 12 patients were excluded. Surgeries were performed using a 3.5-mm Locking Compression Plate (LCP) between 2007 and 2015. Patients were treated either with a locking plate (group L, n = 45) or a nonlocking plate (group N, n = 45). In both groups, the plates were fixed to the proximal and distal clavicle with two and/or three screws, respectively. The main outcome measures were complication rates, time to bone union, and Constant score.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients in group L (mean age, 45.9 years) and 41 in group N (mean age, 43.6 years) were followed. The overall complication rates in groups L and N were 7.2% (three peri-implant fractures) and 7.3% (non-union, deformed plate, and peri-implant fracture), respectively (p = .98). The average time to union significantly differed between groups (L vs. N: 13.0 ± 4.1 vs. 17.5 ± 6.3 weeks; p < .01). However, the Constant score at the final follow-up was not significantly different between groups (L vs. N: 87.0 ± 12.3 vs. 89.8 ± 9.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Similar complication rates and clinical results were found for locking and nonlocking superior plate fixation for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. However, the time to bone union was shorter with the locking plate. This study suggests that both plating systems are effective for treating displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, level I.

Development of the Home Fall Hazard Checklist

Objective

Home hazard assessment is particularly important following a fracture as a means of preventing subsequent fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate current checklists and evidence on home hazard to develop a usable self-administered checklist that could be used by adults to assess home hazards.

Design

Review and observational, prospective study. Setting. Community dwelling. Participants. Nine adults (4 men, 5 women) were asked to review the checklist and provide feedback on whether items were relevant, comprehensive, and easy to understand. Intervention. A search for literature examining the causes of falls that focused on home hazards or behaviours was conducted, and causes were extracted. Using the combined list of home hazards, a draft checklist was created. The participants were asked to pilot the checklist through their home. Primary and Secondary Outcome. An initial iteration of the checklist was modified to reduce redundancy (by grouping certain items together), improve usability (by adding a “not applicable category”), and improve readability (by removing double-barrelled questions or rewriting certain items).

Results

This process resulted in 74 items in 10 areas. On average, it took 10 minutes for the participants to complete the home walk-through while filling out the checklist.

Conclusion

The fall hazard-home checklist is a new checklist designed to identify home fall hazards with the intended use of being either administered by self-report through memory or supported by a walk-about, and that could potentially be completed by a patient who has incurred a fall, fracture, a family member, or caregiver. Given the expense of home hazard assessments that involve a home visit, the validity of this method of detection warrants further investigation.

Evaluation of fixation after plating of distal radius fractures - a validation study

We used five fresh-frozen cadavers with 10 upper limbs to evaluate by finite element analysis (FEA) the plate fixation of distal radius fractures. The distal radius of the cadavers was fractured using a comminution fracture model. Plate fixation was performed using Synthes VATCP. Compression tests were performed on these specimens and force displacement curves were obtained. FEA was performed using Mechanical Finder. The Keyak, Keller vertebra, Carter, and Matsuyama conversion equations without contact analysis, and the Matsuyama equations with contact analysis, were used for the boundary conditions. We found strong positive correlations with the Matsuyama conversion equations either with or without contact analysis. The validated FEA model will be used for preoperative simulation of actual fractures.

Isoelastic resurfacing prosthesis for distal radius fractures: Outcomes in 24 cases with at least 2 years' follow-up

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental resurfacing prostheses have been reported to be useful for treating comminuted fractures involving the distal radial joint surface in elderly patients with osteoporosis. However, the data on this method remain scarce and further evaluations are needed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes after unicompartmental resurfacing prosthesis implantation in patients with distal radius fractures and at least 2 years' follow-up.

HYPOTHESIS

Outcomes with Prosthelast® are as good in the mid-term as in the short term.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 24 patients with type C fractures in the AO classification. The Prosthelast® prosthesis was implanted in each. Mean age was 78 years (60 to 91). There were 22 females. Three of the fractures were open. The patients were evaluated clinically using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, ranges of motion at the wrist, and grip strength. In addition, functional scores were determined, and radiographs obtained.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 55.2 months (24-97). Mean tourniquet time was 61.9minutes (37-126). Mean motion ranges were 39° in flexion, 49° in extension, 74° in pronation, and 68° in supination. The mean VAS pain score was 2.1 (0-7). The mean Quick DASH was 39.8 (9.09-77), the mean PRWE was 42.7 (5-95), and mean grip strength was 38 (25-150). Painful motion limitation of the elbow was noted in a patient treated with total elbow prosthesis. Complex regional pain syndrome developed in 6 patients, and 5 patients required revision surgery. Asymptomatic perforation of the radial head occurred in 8 patients. No cases of peri-prosthetic osteolysis or osteoarthritis were noted. The prosthesis impinged on the lunate bone in 2 patients and on the scaphoid bone in one patient. Mean ulnar variance was +0.17mm (-1 to 7.5). Bone remodelling about the prosthesis was noted in all the patients, but 2.

DISCUSSION

Our data obtained after a mean follow-up of 55 months indicate that resurfacing prostheses have a role to play in the treatment of comminuted articular fractures in patients with osteoporosis. A long-term study is needed to further evaluate these results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; therapeutic.

Females Are Not Proportionally Smaller Males: Relationships Between Radius Anthropometrics and Their Sex Differences

Background: Distal radius fracture reduction by internal fixation is most commonly achieved using volar locking plates (VLPs). Many standard VLP designs make little point contact with radius anatomy, and most postsurgical complications following fixation are attributed to poor implant fit. Sex differences may require consideration in implant design, as females more commonly require VLP removal. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to determine whether the relationships between measures of radius shape are proportional between the sexes. Methods: Three-dimensional radius bone geometries were created from 40 male and 34 female (mean age = 72.04 years) forearm computed tomographic scans in Mimics (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). Eleven measures of radius shape were collected from each scan. Principal components analysis was performed on these measures to determine which shape variables account for the greatest differences in radius shape among individuals and between the sexes. Results: Principal component scores representing isometric radius size separated the sexes. Six anthropometric measures significantly correlated with isometric radius size for all specimens, whereas 3 and 1 measures significantly correlated with isometric radius size in males and females, respectively. Conclusions: Anthropometrics of male and female radii vary by different proportions. Using anthropometrics from both sexes to create a single implant system may not result in optimal patient fit for either sex.

The effect of the degradation pattern of biodegradable bone plates on the healing process using a biphasic mechano-regulation theory

Bone plates are used to treat bone fractures by stabilizing the fracture site and allowing treatments to take place. Mechanical properties of the applied bone plate determine the stability of the fracture site and affect the endochondral ossification process and the healing performance. In recent years, biodegradable bone plates have been used in demand for the elimination of a second surgery to remove the plate. The degradation of these plates into the body environment is commonly accompanied by alterations in the mechanical properties of the bone plate and a shift in the healing performance of the bone. In the present study, the effects of using biodegradable plates with various elastic moduli and degradation patterns, including linear and nonlinear, on the healing process are investigated. A three-dimensional finite element model of the radius bone along with a mechano-regulation theory was used to study the healing performance. Two mechanical stimuli of octahedral shear strain and interstitial fluid flow are considered as the propelling factors of healing. The results of this study indicated that increasing the bone plate's initial elastic modulus accelerates the healing process. However, by increasing the initial Young's modulus of the plate more than 100 GPa, no noticeable alteration is observed. The degradation time period of the plate was seen to be directly related to the speed of the healing process. It is shown, however, that by increasing the degradation time period to more than 8 weeks, the healing performance remains almost unchanged. The results of this work showed that the application of plates with a high enough initial elastic modulus and degradation period can prevent the healing process from decelerating.

Intra-articular corrective osteotomy for intra-articular malunion of distal radius fracture using three-dimensional surgical computer simulation and patient-matched instrument

BACKGROUND

Corrective osteotomy of malunited intra-articular distal radius fracture is challenging. In this study, we investigated the results in patients with malunited intra-articular distal radius fracture who underwent intra-articular corrective osteotomy through an extra-articular approach using three-dimensional (3-D) computer simulation and a patient-matched instrument (PMI).

METHODS

We retrospectively studied five consecutive patients with symptomatic malunited intra-articular distal radius fracture who underwent corrective osteotomy using a PMI. The maximal step-off on computed tomography and the deformity angle on plain radiographs were evaluated. The clinical examination parameters included range of motion (ROM), grip strength, pain according to visual analog scale (VAS), and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score.

RESULTS

The maximal step-off was significantly reduced from 4.9 ± 1.8 to 1.0 ± 0.2 mm (p = 0.008). The absolute differences between the affected side and the normal contralateral side in radial inclination were significantly reduced from 5.4° ± 3.4°-1.2° ± 1.1° (p = 0.043). These differences were not significantly reduced postoperatively in the volar tilt and ulnar variance. VAS was significantly reduced from 4.1 ± 1.6 to 0.9 ± 0.7 cm (p = 0.006). The PRWE score significantly improved from 41.6 ± 22.0 to 15.7 ± 19.5 (p = 0.043). Grip strength was significantly increased from 54.0% ± 14.8%-85.8% ± 18.8% (p = 0.003). The preoperative and postoperative total arc of the wrist and forearm ROM were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular corrective osteotomy using PMI could be one of the reliable treatment options for intra-articular malunion. PMI has exceptionally high precision performance, and it is also anticipated to yield superior surgical results.

Which Decisions For Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Distal Radius Fractures Should Be Shared?

PURPOSE

To evaluate, from the surgeon's perspective, the importance, feasibility, and appropriateness of sharing decisions during an episode of care of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) or distal radius fracture in patients aged greater than 65 years.

METHODS

A consortium of 9 fellowship-trained hand/upper-limb surgeons used the RAND Corporation/University of California Los Angeles Delphi Appropriateness method to evaluate the importance, feasibility, and appropriateness of sharing 27 decisions for CTS and 28 decisions for distal radius fractures in patients aged greater than 65 years. Panelists rated each measure on a scale of 1 (definitely not important/feasible/appropriate) to 9 (definitely important/feasible/appropriate) in 2 voting rounds with an intervening face-to-face discussion. Panelist agreement and disagreement were assessed using predetermined criteria.

RESULTS

Panelists achieved agreement on 16 decisions (29%) as important, 43 (78%) as feasible, and 17 (31%) as appropriate for sharing with patients. Twelve decisions met all 3 of these criteria and were therefore considered important, feasible, and appropriate to share with patients. Examples in CTS included decisions to perform extra confirmatory diagnostic testing, to have surgery, and to perform a steroid injection into the carpal tunnel. Examples in distal radius fracture management included the decision to have surgery, type of pain medication prescribed after surgery, and whether to remove the implant. The remaining 43 decisions did not reach consensus on the importance, feasibility, and appropriateness of sharing with patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a validated consensus-building approach, we identified 12 decisions made during an episode of care for CTS or distal radius fracture that were important, feasible, and appropriate to share with patients from the surgeon's perspective. These decisions merit inclusion in shared decision-making models (eg, preoperative patient preference elicitation tools or decision aids) to align patient preferences with care decisions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding which aspects of care are important, feasible, and appropriate to share with patients may improve patient-centered care by aligning patient preferences with care decisions.

Complications after operatively treated distal radius fractures

In the recent years, treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF) has advanced considerably. Surgical fixation with palmar angular stable plate has gained popularity, due to a reported lower complication rate when compared to dorsal fixation. The type of trauma or injury, surgical procedure and impaired bone quality are all contributors to complications in DRF. The main aim of this review is to summarize the most common complications and possible therapeutic solutions. In addition, strategies for minimizing these complications will be discussed.

Assessment of Anatomic Restoration of Distal Radius Fractures Among Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

The value of precise anatomic restoration for distal radius fractures (DRFs) in older adults has been debated for many decades, with conflicting results in the literature. In light of the growing population of adults aged 60 years and older, both fracture incidence and associated treatment costs are expected to increase.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between radiographic measures of reduction and patient outcomes after DRF in older patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Data were collected from the Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial (WRIST), a multicenter randomized clinical trial of DRF treatments for adults aged 60 years and older (enrollment from April 10, 2012, to December 31, 2016, with a 2-year follow-up). Data analysis was performed from January 3, 2019, to August 19, 2019. WRIST participants who completed 12-month assessments were included in the study. According to the biomechanical principle of alignment, 2-phase multivariable regression models were adopted to assess the association between radiographic measures of reduction and functional and patient-reported outcomes 12 months following treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to receive volar locking plate, percutaneous pinning, or external fixation. Those who opted for nonoperative treatment received casts.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Hand grip strength, wrist arc of motion, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) total score, MHQ function score, and MHQ activities of daily living score were measured at 12 months following treatment.

RESULTS

Data from 166 WRIST participants (144 [86.7%] women; mean [SD] age, 70.9 [8.9] years) found that only 2 of the 84 correlation coefficients calculated were statistically significant. For patients aged 70 years or older, every degree increase in radial inclination away from normal (22°) grip strength in the injured hand was 1.1 kg weaker than the uninjured hand (95% CI, 0.38-1.76; P = .004) and each millimeter increase toward normal (0 mm) in ulnar variance was associated with a 10.4-point improvement in MHQ ADL score (95% CI, -16.84 to -3.86; P = .003). However, neither of these radiographic parameters appeared to be associated with MHQ total or function scores.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The study results suggest that precise restoration of wrist anatomy is not associated with better patient outcomes for older adults with DRF 12 months following treatment. Surgeons can consider this evidence to improve quality of care by prioritizing patient preferences and efficient use of resources over achieving exact realignment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01589692.

Outcomes and Complications in the Management of Distal Radial Fractures in the Elderly

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to identify trends in management and to compare the outcomes and complications following nonoperative and operative management (including external fixation, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and open reduction and internal fixation) for distal radial fractures in patients ≥65 years of age.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis, with use of the OptumLabs Data Warehouse database, of patients ≥65 years of age who had been managed for a distal radial fracture between 2009 and 2014 (as indicated by diagnosis codes according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification). Ninety-day and 1-year complication rates per 1,000 fractures were analyzed overall and by treatment modality.

RESULTS

Thirteen thousand, seven hundred and thirteen distal radial fractures were analyzed. The overall 90-day complication rate was 36.5 per 1,000 fractures, and the 1-year upper-extremity-specific complication rate was 236.2 and 307.5 per 1,000 fractures for nonoperative and operative management, respectively. Overall, post-injury stiffness was the most common 1-year upper-extremity-specific complication (incidence, 11.5%). There was no significant difference between operative and nonoperative management in terms of 90-day complication rates. However, operative management had a higher 1-year complication rate than nonoperative management (307.5 versus 236.2 per 1,000 fractures). Overall, the 5 most common upper-extremity-specific complications following operative treatment of distal radial fracture were stiffness (16.0%), chronic regional pain syndrome (9.9%), median neuropathy (8.0%), implant-related complications (3.8%), and tendon-related complications (2.8%). Stiffness was significantly more frequent following operative management (16.0% versus 9.8%; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Operative management of a distal radial fracture should be carefully considered when discussing treatment options with patients ≥65 years of age.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Sequential Radiographic Evaluation During Closed Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture

OBJECTIVES

To test the null hypothesis that there is no significant change in radiographic parameters, which determines an acceptable reduction, beyond 3 weeks in distal radius fractures with closed treatment.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of a prospectively gathered registry of distal radius fractures.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent closed treatment of distal radius fracture.

INTERVENTION

Sequential radiographic evaluation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Change of radiographic measurement including radial inclination, radial height, ulnar variance, articular tilt, teardrop angle, anteroposterior distance, intra-articular gap, and step-off. We compared postreduction radiographic parameters once within 2 weeks, at the third week, at cessation of immobilization, and analyzed the interobserver reliability test.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference between radiographic measurements, which determined an acceptable reduction between radiographs performed within 2 weeks versus the third week. Radial inclination and ulnar variance were statistically different at the third week compared with the time of cessation of immobilization. Seventy-seven percent of patients who had an acceptable reduction after 2 weeks maintained acceptable alignment at cessation of immobilization. Eighty-five percent of patients with acceptable reduction after 3 weeks maintained acceptable alignment at cessation of immobilization. Radial shortening >1.8 mm at the third week predicts an unacceptable radiographic outcome at cessation of immobilization (sensitivity 94.5% and specificity 90%).

CONCLUSION

Radiographic parameters that determine acceptable reduction for closed treatment of distal radius fractures change minimally after 3-week postacceptable closed reduction. Radial shortening at the third week can be used to predict an unacceptable radiographic outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patient satisfaction after treatment of distal radial fractures in older adults

The Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial (WRIST) collaboration is the largest clinical trial ever conducted in hand surgery. We applied data from this study to examine the relationship between functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after treatment of distal radial fractures. Patients aged 60 years and older with isolated distal radial fractures were enrolled at 24 health systems. Grip strength and the arc of wrist motion were measured after treatment. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire was used to measure patient satisfaction. Receiver operating characteristic curves were created using patient satisfaction as the reference standard and each functional measure as a predictor. At 12 months after treatment, mean grip strength was 82% of normal and mean arc of motion was 88% of normal. The optimal cut-off points to distinguish satisfaction from dissatisfaction occurred when patients recovered 59% of hand strength and 79% of wrist motion. Continuing therapy to increase functional gains beyond this point unnecessarily utilizes healthcare resources without additional patient-reported gains. Level of evidence: IV.

A Comparison of Radiographic Outcomes between 3D Preoperative Planning and Conventional Planning in the Osteosynthesis of Distal Radius Fractures

Background: To assess the usefulness of three-dimensional (3D) digital pre-operative planning, we compared the radiographic parameters of the distal radius from 3D planning and conventional planning after osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures. We hypothesized that the use of 3D digital planning may improve radiographic outcomes for reduction and decrease the risk of correction loss. Methods: Sixty wrists of 60 distal radius fracture patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the order of hospital visits. Thirty wrists were treated with 3D preoperative planning as the plan group. Another thirty wrists were treated with conventional preoperative planning as the control group. Both groups were treated with volar locking plates. In the plan group, 3D digital preoperative planning and a surgical simulation were performed in order to determine the reduction and placement of the implants in addition to the plate/screw size prior to surgery. In the control group, conventional preoperative planning was performed. Ulnar variance, volar tilt, and radial inclination were measured at one week, three and six months after surgery. Difference of the measurement of radiographic parameters between operated and healthy side wrists were compared between plan and control groups at one week after surgery. Loss of corrections for radiographic parameters were compared between plan and control groups. Results: The differences between the operated and healthy side wrists were significantly smaller in the plan group compared to the control group for the volar tilt and radial inclination (p < 0.05).The loss of corrections for ulnar variance and volar tilt were significantly smaller in the plan group compared to the control group at six months after surgery (p < 0.05). Conclusions: 3D preoperative planning offers better reduction accuracy and reduces correction loss in the osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures.

Treatment Trends, Complications, and Effects of Comorbidities on Distal Radius Fractures

Background: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common upper extremity fractures in adults. This study seeks to elucidate the impact age, fracture type, and patient comorbidities have on the current treatment of DRFs and risk of complications. We hypothesized that comorbidities rather than age would relate to the risk of complications in the treatment of DRFs. Methods: A retrospective review of data was performed for patients treated between 2007 and 2014 using Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases. Patients who sustained a DRF were separated into "closed" versus "open" treatment groups, and the association between patient demographics, treatment type, and comorbidities with complication rates was analyzed, along with the trend of treatment modalities throughout the study time interval. Results: In total, 155 353 DRFs were identified; closed treatment predominated in all age groups with the highest percentage of open treatment occurring in the 50- to 59-year age group. Between 2007 and 2014, there was an increase in the rate of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in all age groups <90 with the largest increase (11%) occurring in the 70- to 79-year age group. Higher complication rates were observed in the open treatment group in all ages <90 years with a trend toward decreasing complication rates as age increased. Comorbidities were more strongly associated with the risk of developing complications than age. Conclusions: Closed treatment of DRFs remains the predominant treatment method among all age groups, but DRFs are increasingly being treated with ORIF. Emphasis on the patients' comorbidities rather than chronological age should be considered in the treatment decision-making process of elderly patients with DRFs.

Minimally invasive internal fixation for extra-articular distal radius fracture: Comparison between volar plate and intramedullary nail

INTRODUCTION

There are numerous internal fixation techniques for distal radius fracture, using pins, plates or nails. Some authors have developed minimally invasive procedures. The aim of the present study was to compare two minimally invasive internal fixation techniques for unstable extra-articular distal radius fracture in women over 50 years of age: volar plate (minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: MIPO), and intramedullary nail.

HYPOTHESES

The main study hypothesis was that the incision scar left by minimally invasive internal fixation is smaller using MIPO than an intramedullary nail. The secondary hypotheses were that the two techniques do not differ in terms of pain, functional score, strength, range of motion and radiologic indices.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The series comprised nineteen A2.2 and one A2.1 fractures in 20 female patients with a mean age of 72 years. The first 10 (group 1) received minimally invasive internal fixation of the distal radius by MIPO, and the other 10 (group 2) by intramedullary nail locked onto the distal radius epiphysis and diaphysis.

RESULTS

The main study hypothesis was confirmed: the incision scar left by minimally invasive internal fixation was smaller using MIPO than an intramedullary nail (mean, 14.3mm vs. 32.8mm). Some of the secondary hypotheses were also confirmed: there were no differences between the two techniques in terms of pain at 6 months, QuickDASH, PRWE (Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluation), range of motion or ulnar variance; two were not confirmed: pain at 6 weeks was less with intramedullary nails, and palmar slope was better with MIPO.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The main study hypothesis was confirmed: the incision scar left by minimally invasive internal fixation was smaller using MIPO than an intramedullary nail. In conclusion, the present findings showed that internal fixation of unstable extra-articular fracture in over 50-year-olds gave better clinical results at 6 weeks using an intramedullary nail, while MIPO required smaller incision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective study.

Screw Length Optimization of a Volar Locking Plate Using Three Dimensional Preoperative Planning in Distal Radius Fractures

BACKGROUND

A three-dimensional (3D) digital pre-operative planning system for the osteosynthesis of distal radius fracture was developed. The objective of this study was to evaluate screw choices for three-dimensional (3D) digital pre-operative planning of osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures and to compare with the screw choices for the conventional method.

METHODS

Distal radius fracture patients who underwent osteosynthesis using volar locking plates were evaluated. Thirty wrists in the plan group utilized 3D preoperative planning, and nineteen wrists in the control group utilized conventional preoperative assessment. In the plan group, the 3D preoperative planning was performed prior to surgery. The reduction was simulated with 3D image, and the implant choice/placement also simulated on the 3D image. In the control group, standard preoperative planning was performed using posterior-anterior and lateral view radiographs, and CT scan. After the planning, osteosynthesis was performed. During the surgery, the operator performed the reduction and the placement of the plate while comparing images between the pre-operative plan and fluoroscopy. The distal screw lengths and the anteroposterior diameter of the radius along the axis of the distal screws were measured. The ratios of the screw length and radius diameter were evaluated. The screw/radius ratios within the range of 0.75-1.00 were considered appropriate. The screw choices less than 0.75, or greater than 1.00 were considered inappropriate. The rate of appropriate screw choices were compared between plan and control groups.

RESULTS

The results of appropriate screw choices were 86.1% and 74.8% in the plan group and the control group, respectively. The inappropriate screw choices were 14.0% and 25.2% in the plan group and the control group, respectively. The three-dimensional planning significantly increased appropriate screw choices compared to the conventional planning (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional digital preoperative planning is useful for the optimization of screw lengths in osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures.

Older Patient Preferences for Internal Fixation after a Distal Radius Fracture: A Qualitative Study from the Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fracture treatments provide similar functional outcomes. It has been hypothesized that the use of internal fixation is increasing because of physician preferences. The multisite randomized Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial provides a unique opportunity to examine patient preferences in the absence of surgeon influence. The authors' objective was to investigate patient preference for internal fixation even after being informed of the equipoise among treatments.

METHODS

The authors performed 30 semistructured interviews with older individuals, all older than 60 years, approached at their institution for the Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial. The authors' sample included three groups: those with a preference for internal fixation (n = 11), those with preference for nonsurgical treatment (n = 6), and those without a preference who consented to surgical randomization (n = 13). We used grounded theory for data collection and analysis.

RESULTS

All participants indicated their chief concern was regaining full function. Patients based their preferences for internal fixation on multiple values, including obstacles to recovery, autonomy, aesthetics, and pain relief. Some patients who did not select internal fixation reflected on their experiences, questioning whether they would have had a potentially different outcome with internal fixation treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Without evidence for a superior treatment, patients focus on factors that pertain to recovery rather than outcomes, with most preferring the volar locking plating system. To best align with patient values, physicians should focus their discussion with patients on aspects of the recovery period rather than functional outcomes. Evidence from the Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial will provide high-level information about patient-reported, functional, and radiographic outcomes.

Screw placement is everything: Risk factors for loss of reduction with volar locking distal radius plates

AIM

To determine factors correlated with postoperative radial shortening in patients with distal radius fractures treated with volar locking distal radius plates.

METHODS

A total of 250 patients with a distal radius fracture stabilised with volar locking plates between January 2010 and December 2014 were included in a multicentre retrospective cohort study. We measured the distance of the distal locking screws to the joint line immediately postoperatively and then measured radial shortening after six to eight weeks using the change in ulnar variance.

RESULTS

Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that there was a significant linear association between the distance of the screws from the joint line and radial shortening. No other patient, injury, or treatment-related characteristic significantly influenced radial shortening in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Distal locking screws should be placed as close as possible to the subchondral joint line to prevent postoperative loss of reduction.

Double-tiered subchondral support fixation with optimal distal dorsal cortical distance using a variable-angle volar locking-plate system for distal radius fracture in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Double-tiered subchondral support (DSS) procedures with optimal distal dorsal cortical distance (DDD) have been reported to be effective in treating distal radius fractures, but there have been no studies of osteoporotic distal radius fractures in elderly patients. In this study, we demonstrated the efficacy of the DSS procedure with optimal DDD using a variable-angle volar locking-plate system for the treatment of osteoporotic distal radius fractures in elderly patients.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-two patients (mean age, 73.3 years; age range, 65-88 years) with distal radius fracture were treated using a variable-angle volar locking-plate system with DSS. Patients were divided into DSS and non-DSS groups based on postoperative and 12-month follow-up radiographs, and radiological and clinical assessment was performed. Finally, we divided all 122 patients into two groups based on volar tilt of 6° on 12-month follow-up radiographs, and postoperative DDD values were compared.

RESULTS

Volar tilt decreased (p=0.02), and ulnar variance increased (p=0.01) more in the non-DSS group. The non-DSS group showed a significant correlation between postoperative DDD value and change in DDD value (p=0.00). The mean postoperative DDDs in the group with final volar tilt<6° and in the group with final volar tilt≥6° were 6.4mm (SD±1.7mm) and 4.6mm (SD±1.4mm) respectively (p=0.02). At 4-month follow-up, pronation (p=0.05) and supination (p=0.04) were improved, and at 12-month follow-up, supination (p=0.05) was improved in the DSS group.

CONCLUSION

The use of the DSS procedure and reduction of DDD to 4.6mm or less using a variable-angle volar locking-plate system was effective in maintaining anatomical reduction for the treatment of osteoporotic distal radius fractures in elderly patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Therapeutic study.

Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective Descriptive Study

BACKGROUND

Disability of the upper limb is one of the consequences of distal radius fracture (DRF). The outcome of DRF treatment is based on objective clinical variables, as strength or range of movement (ROM); sometimes these variables do not correlate with the functional level of the patient. The principal objective of our study was to assess the repercussion of conservative treatment of DRF on upper limb disability.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. We collected data of 61 nonconsecutive DRFs treated conservatively from July 2007 to August 2008.

RESULTS

Average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score before fracture was 20.8 points; average DASH score after the fracture was 42.6. There was a significant increase in the upper limb disability after 1 year of follow-up in the patients treated conservatively ( P < .001; size effect, 1.06). Average radial inclination, radial tilt, and radial length were 18.18°, 3.35°, and 5.76 mm, respectively. Average ROM for flexion-extension was 100.6° and for pronation-supination 144.0°. ROM for flexion-extension of the unaffected wrist was 128.2° and for pronation-supination 172.4°. We did not find any significant statistical correlation between the increase in disability and the decrease in the ROM ( P > .05). We did not find any significant statistical correlation between the increase in the disability and the worsening in the radiological parameters ( P > .05). Our results confirm the hypothesis that the conservative treatment of DRF produced an increase in the upper limb disability after 1 year of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study does not show a correlation between the increase in upper limb disability and the decrease in wrist ROM. Our study did not find a correlation between radiological measures and DASH scores.

Conservative treatment of distal fractures after the age of 65: a review of literature

The goal of this study was to evaluate the role of conservative treatment of distal radius fractures in the elderly since 2000. Our series included 22 articles, of which 3 reviews, 2 meta-analyses, 6 descriptive series of conservative treatment, 10 series comparing surgical and conservative treatments and 1 series comparing different types of conservative treatments. The reduction was performed by closed reduction in 7 cases and by traction in 3 cases. A short-arm cast was used in 8 cases and a long-arm cast in 4 cases for an average length of 6 weeks. The indications of conservative treatment were varied: AO type A fractures in 2 cases, type C fractures in 1 case, types A and C in 8 cases and types A, B and C in 3 cases. No article reported any significant difference between surgical and conservative treatments in terms of DASH or PRWE, whereas strength was sometimes improved when surgical treatment was used. Radiological results were always better after surgical treatment. The rate of complications varied greatly, greater, equally or lower compared to conservative treatment depending on the series. All in all, there is no consensus to assert that a conservative treatment is more justified than a surgical treatment to treat distal radius fractures after the age of 65. Most authors consider that the long-term clinical outcome is identical and that the radiological result is better after surgical treatment. The fact that the fixation of a distal radius fracture by a volar locking plate after 65 years speeds up the recovery remains to be proven.

Reproducibility of three dimensional digital preoperative planning for the osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures

A three-dimensional (3D) digital preoperative planning system for the osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures was developed for clinical practice. To assess the usefulness of the 3D planning for osteosynthesis, we evaluated the reproducibility of the reduction shapes and selected implants in the patients with distal radius fractures. Twenty wrists of 20 distal radius fracture patients who underwent osteosynthesis using volar locking plates were evaluated. The 3D preoperative planning was performed prior to each surgery. Four surgeons conducted the surgeries. The surgeons performed the reduction and the placement of the plate while comparing images between the preoperative plan and fluoroscopy. Preoperative planning and postoperative reductions were compared by measuring volar tilt and radial inclination of the 3D images. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the volar tilt and radial inclination were evaluated. For the implant choices, the ICCs for the screw lengths between the preoperative plan and the actual choices were evaluated. The ICCs were 0.644 (p < 0.01) and 0.625 (p < 0.01) for the volar tilt and radial inclination in the 3D measurements, respectively. The planned size of plate was used in all of the patients. The ICC for the screw length between preoperative planning and actual choice was 0.860 (p < 0.01). Good reproducibility for the reduction shape and excellent reproducibility for the implant choices were achieved using 3D preoperative planning for distal radius fracture. Three-dimensional digital planning was useful to visualize the reduction process and choose a proper implant for distal radius fractures. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2646-2651, 2017.

Predictive Power of Distal Radial Metaphyseal Tenderness for Diagnosing Occult Fracture

PURPOSE

To correlate the physical examination finding of distal radial metaphyseal tenderness with plain radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging after acute wrist injury to diagnose occult distal radius fractures. We hypothesized that persistent distal radial metaphyseal tenderness 2 weeks after acute injuries is predictive of an occult fracture.

METHODS

Twenty-nine adult patients presented, after acute trauma, with distal radial metaphyseal tenderness and initial plain radiographs and/or fluoroscopic images that did not show a distal radius fracture. Patients were reevaluated clinically and radiographically at approximately 2 weeks after initial presentation. Patients with persistent distal radial tenderness and negative radiographs underwent magnetic resonance imaging to definitively diagnose an occult distal radius fracture. We calculated the sensitivity and positive predictive value for persistent distal radial metaphyseal tenderness using a 95% confidence interval and standard formulas. Both radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging were used as our endpoint diagnosis for a distal radius fracture.

RESULTS

We diagnosed 28 occult distal radius fractures, 8 by follow-up radiograph and 20 by magnetic resonance imaging. The positive predictive value for patients who completed the protocol was 96%. One patient who did not have an occult distal radius fracture had a fracture of the ulnar styloid.

CONCLUSIONS

Tenderness of the distal radial metaphysis after wrist injury is strongly suggestive of a distal radius fracture despite both normal plain radiographs and fluoroscopic images.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic III.

Volar Plate Fixation in Patients Older Than 70 Years with AO Type C Distal Radial Fractures: Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes

Introduction  Treatment of unstable distal radial fractures (DRFs) in elderly patients is controversial, and considering the increasing life expectancy, their appropriate treatment is of growing importance. Our aim was to analyze the clinical and radiologic outcomes in the elderly patients with AO type C DRF treated with volar locking plate (VLP). Materials and Methods  Between 2007 and 2011, 572 DRFs were operated on in our hospital with open reduction and internal fixation with VLP. Of these, only 64 patients (66 DRFs) met the selection criteria (AO type C DRF, age > 70 years, minimum 12-month follow-up). Mean follow-up was 28 months. Outcome assessment included range of motion, grip strength, VAS pain, Mayo Clinic Score, and DASH score. Analysis of pre- and postoperative radiographs was performed. Complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed comparing the results with the contralateral side. Results  Mean postoperative range of motion of the injured wrist compared with the control contralateral side was 86% for flexion ( p  < 0.001), 92% for extension ( p  < 0.001). The average DASH was 12. Mayo Clinic Wrist Score showed 43 excellent results, 15 good, 4 satisfactory, and 4 poor. Articular step-offs were reduced in 34 of 38 wrists. Five (7%) patients required plate removal. Conclusion  The treatment of articular DRF (AO type C) with VLP in the elderly patients achieved greater than 90% of the wrist range of motion and grip strength with no residual pain in greater than 90% of the patients. Level of Evidence  Therapeutic IV, case series.

Which immobilization is better for distal radius fracture? A prospective randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine whether an above-elbow cast (AEC) is better than a below-elbow cast (BEC) at maintaining the initial reduction in the orthopaedic management of a distal radius fracture (DRF).

METHODS

It is a prospective randomized study carried out in a single emergency trauma department. There were 72 patients older than 55 years of age (55-96) with a distal radius fracture treated orthopaedically. They were randomized into two groups: group B (AEC 32 patients) and group A (BEC 40 patients). Randomization was done by a computer program. Four subgroups were constituted according to the instability criteria: subgroup 4 the most instable fractures. Main outcome was reduction loss from initial reduction to cast removal: it was measured using the volar tilt, radial tilt and radial length on plain radiographs.

RESULTS

No differences were observed between group A and B when analysed globally (volar tilt loss p = 0.89 radial tilt loss p = 0.08 ulnar variance p = 0.19). Subgroups analysis revealed less radial tilt reduction loss in group A in patients within subgroup 3 (p = 0.02) and 4 (p = 0.003).

DISCUSSION

Results are in contrast to what was expected. Limiting prono-supination AEC is supposed to better maintain initial fracture reduction. Effect of pronation and supination as well as distraction of brachioradialis muscle could have been overestimated until now.

CONCLUSION

The above-elbow cast is not better than the below-elbow cast in terms of loss reduction. However, the below-elbow cast more efficiently controls radial tilt reduction.

Supervised physical therapy vs home exercise program for patients with distal radius fracture: A single-blind randomized clinical study

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized clinical study.

INTRODUCTION

Supervised physical therapy (PT) and home exercise programs (HEPs) are frequently used in the rehabilitation of patients with distal radius fracture (DRF). However, there is no consensus as to whether unsupervised HEP provides comparable benefits to those achieved by supervised PT.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To compare the improvements in pain and functional status between a supervised PT program and unsupervised HEP in DRF patients older than 60 years.

METHODS

A total of 74 patients were randomized into 2 groups. One group received 12 sessions of supervised PT (n = 37), and the other group followed an exercise program at home (n = 37). Three evaluations were performed, before the initiation of treatment, at 6-week, and 6-month follow-up. The study conducted a statistical power analysis to detect an intergroup difference score of 15 points on the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). The t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used, and it was set with a significance level of .05.

RESULTS

The supervised PT group showed clinically significant differences in the total PRWE score at 6 weeks (17.67 points, P = .000) in the PRWE function score (15.2 points, P = .000) and in the PRWE pain score (5.6 points, P = .039). There was also a significant difference in the total PRWE score at 6-month follow-up (17.05 points, P = .000) in the PRWE function score (14.5 points, P = .000) and in the PRWE pain score (2.5 points, P = .35).

CONCLUSIONS

A supervised PT program is more effective for improving function in the short- and medium-term when compared with HEP in patients older than 60 years with DRF extraarticular without immediate complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1b.

Epidemiology of distal radius fractures and factors predicting risk and prognosis

STUDY DESIGN

Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION

For optimal Distal Radius Fracture (DRF) rehabilitation and fracture prevention, it is important to understand the epidemiology and factors predictive of injury, chronic pain, chronic disability, and subsequent fracture.

PURPOSE

To summarize the literature reporting on DRF epidemiology, risk factors, and prognostic factors.

METHODS

Literature synthesis.

RESULTS

Although incidence varies globally, DRFs are common across the lifespan and appear to be on the rise. Risk of DRF is determined by personal factors (age, sex/gender, lifestyle, health condition) and environmental factors (population density, climate). For example, age and sex influence risk such that DRF is most common in boys/young men and older women. The most common causes of DRF in the pediatric and young adult age groups include playing/sporting activities and motor vehicle accidents. In contrast, the most common mechanism of injury in older adults is a low-energy trauma because of a fall from a standing height. Poorer health outcomes are associated with older age, being female, poor bone healing (or having an associated fracture of the ulnar styloid), having a compensated injury, and a lower socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk stratification according to predictors of chronic pain and disability enable therapists to identify those patients who will benefit from advocacy for more comprehensive assessment, targeted interventions, and tailored educational strategies. The unique opportunity for secondary prevention of osteoporotic fracture after DRF has yet to be realized by treating therapists in the orthopedic community.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes and Rehabilitation

Distal radius fractures account for nearly 1 of every 5 fractures in individuals aged 65 or older. Moreover, increased susceptibility to vertebral and hip fractures has been documented in patients a year after suffering a distal radius fracture. Although women are more susceptible to hip fractures, men experience a higher mortality rate in the 7 years following a distal radius fracture. Traditional approaches to distal radius fractures have included both surgical and nonsurgical treatments, with predominant complaints involving weakness, stiffness, and pain. Nonsurgical approaches include immobilization with or without reduction, whereas surgical treatments include dorsal spanning bridge plates, percutaneous pinning, external fixation, and volar plate fixation. The nature of the fracture will determine the best treatment option, and surgeons employ a multifactorial treatment approach that includes the patient’s age, nature of injury, joint involvement, and displacement among other factors. Historically, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning have been the most popular approaches. However, volar plate fixation is quickly becoming a popular option as it minimizes tendon irritation, reduces immobilization time, and decreases risk of complication. The goal of treatment is to restore mobility, reduce pain, and improve functional outcomes following rehabilitation. The aim of this review is to summarize the most common treatments and importance of early referral to hand therapy to improve functional outcomes.

Wrist arthroscopy in the management of articular distal radius fractures

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the distal radius account for 15% of all fractures. The use of arthroscopy is increasingly popular in the last years, with the goal to achieve a better anatomical reduction of the articular fragments.

SOURCES OF DATA

We searched the literature on Medline (PubMed), Web of Science and Scopus databases using the combined keywords 'wrist', 'distal radial fracture', 'distal radius fracture' and 'arthroscopy'. Twenty-eight studies were identified. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Coleman Methodological Score.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Arthroscopy allows to detect intra-articular, ligamentous and triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries in an acute setting with a better prognosis. Arthroscopy increases the quality of the intra-articular reduction compared to fluoroscopy.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

The main limitation of the selected studies is the short follow-up: the average follow-up in 20 studies was 12 months, a period long enough to assess functional outcomes, but not to assess the occurrence of post-traumatic degenerative changes and their impact on function. Better stratification of the fracture population is needed.

GROWING POINTS

The shorter recovery time and the low incidence of adverse effects are the main advantages of this new technology.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

There is need to perform randomized controlled trials reporting on the use of volar locking plates as, at the present time, they are the standard management for these fractures. In addition, the different pattern of fracture should be better classified to manage the patients who will benefit after the management.

Determinants of Functional Outcome in Distal Radius Fractures in High-Functioning Patients Older Than 55 Years

OBJECTIVES

To determine the influence of treatment and radiographic parameters on patient-reported functional outcomes on a population of non-frail elderly with distal radius fractures.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Patients older than 55 years presenting with a distal radius fracture and a Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale score of 1 or 2.

INTERVENTION

Closed reduction and casting or open reduction and internal fixation as per the treating surgeons' decision.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Radiographic scores at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks, as well as Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Short Form 36, and Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluation scores up to 1 year after injury. Univariate analysis and linear regression analysis were performed on outcome measures.

RESULTS

No difference exists in outcomes based on treatment choice. Patients with ulnar positivity greater than 2 mm at baseline, after treatment, and at final follow-up had worse patient-reported scores at 1 year. Persistent articular gaps and/or steps greater than 2 mm after treatment were also associated with worse patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Even in high-functioning patients older than 55 years, there was no difference in patient-reported outcomes at 1 year in the open reduction group as compared with the closed reduction group. Instead, physicians should pay particular attention to radial shortening and persistent articular gaps following their chosen treatment plan for distal radial fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius: a critical appraisal of the DRAFFT (distal radius acute fracture fixation trial) study

The results of the DRAFFT (distal radius acute fracture fixation trial) study, which compared volar plating with Kirschner (K-) wire fixation for dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius, were published in August 2014. The use of K-wires to treat these fractures is now increasing, with a concomitant decline in the use of volar locking plates. We provide a critical appraisal of the DRAFFT study and question whether surgeons have been unduly influenced by its headline conclusions.

Role of Depression in Outcomes of Low-Energy Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Older Than 55 Years

OBJECTIVES

This study examines depression and outcomes in patients older than 55 years with distal radius fracture.

DESIGN

Prospective data collection included patient characteristics, treatment, general and limb symptoms and disability, and complications at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year. Bivariate analysis and multivariable linear regression were used to assess relationships between depression and outcome measures, specifically the Short Form-36 (SF-36), Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, and the Centre of Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale.

SETTING

The study was conducted in a level-1 trauma center.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients older than 55 years with isolated distal radius fracture were recruited (2007-2011).

INTERVENTION

Patients were treated operatively or nonoperatively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The SF-36 and DASH scores measured general and upper extremity status. Depression was measured using CES-D scale. All complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 228 patients, 25% were depressed at baseline, 32% at 3 months, and 26% after 1 year. Thirty-two patients (14%) had complications. There was no relationship between depression at baseline and complications; however, there was a statistically significant relationship at 3 months (P = 0.021). There was a statistically significant association between baseline depression and the worse 1-year SF-36. Patients with baseline depression had poorer 1-year DASH scores (20 ± 2.3) than nondepressed patients (11 ± 1.3) (P = 0.0031), and less improvement in DASH scores over the first year (P = 0.023). Multivariable linear regression demonstrated that baseline depression is the strongest predictor of poorer 1-year DASH scores (3.7, P = 0.0078) and change in DASH scores over the first year (2.9, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline depression predicts worse function and disability outcomes 1 year from injury. Depression (CES-D ≥16) is the strongest predictor of worse 1-year DASH scores and SF-36 outcome measures, after controlling for other potential predictors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Classification and treatment of distal radius fractures: a survey among orthopaedic trauma surgeons and residents

Purpose

Classification, the definition of an acceptable reduction and indications for surgery in distal radius fracture management are still subject of debate. The purpose of this study was to characterise current distal radius fracture management in Europe.

Methods

During the European Congress of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ECTES) 2015 a 20-question multiple-choice survey was conducted among the attending surgeons and residents of the hand and wrist session. Consensus was defined as more than 50 % identical answers (moderate consensus 50–75 % and high consensus more than 75 %).

Results

A total of 46 surgeons and residents participated in the survey. High consensus was found among both surgeons and residents for defining the AO/OTA classification as the preferred classification system. For the definition of an acceptable reduction, a moderate to high consensus could be determined. Overall, high consensus was found for non-operative treatment instead of operative treatment in dislocated extra- and intra-articular distal radius fractures with an acceptable closed reduction, regardless of age. We found high (surgeons) and moderate (residents) consensus on the statement that an intra-articular gap or step-off ≥2 mm, in patients younger than 65 years, is an absolute indication for ORIF. The same applied for ORIF in dislocated fractures without an acceptable closed reduction in patients younger than 75 years of age.

Conclusion

Current distal radius fracture management in Europe is characterised by a moderate to high consensus on the majority of aspects of fracture management.

Stabilisation of distal radius fractures: Lessons learned and future directions

Our understanding of the diagnosis and management of distal radius fractures has been a long developed over centuries. There has been a shift in treatment of these very common injuries from closed reduction and casting to internal fixation. The answer to the best method of treatment has yet to be found. Today, we have a multitude of treatment options available with varying degrees of evidence to support their use. This review helps to illustrate the lessons we have learned and future directions for treatment.

Bridging external fixation versus non-bridging external fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the relative effectiveness of bridging external fixation and non-bridging external fixation for distal radius fractures treatment.

METHOD

Relevant literature were comprehensively searched using the PubMed, Springer Link, Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers, Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases without any language restrictions. STATA Version 12.0 software and Comprehensive Meta-analysis 2.0 were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 905 patients with distal radius fracture from six eligible cohort studies were selected for statistical analysis. Our meta-analysis results indicate that the non-bridging cases had a higher risk of pin track infection, rupture of the extensor pollicis longus and nerve injury than the bridging cases. Subgroup analysis stratified by country indicated non-bridging patients showed evidence of an increased risk of pin track infection and higher risk of rupture of the extensor pollicis longus compared with the patients treated with bridging external fixation in the UK population. The follow-up results showed flexion degree of patients treated with non-bridging external fixation was slightly better than that of patients treated with bridging external fixation (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is evidence in our systematic review and meta-analysis to support that bridging external fixation can reduce the incidence of pin tract infections and nerve injury compared to non-bridging external fixation, but have no significant difference in other complications and the recovery of wrist joint function. Bridging external fixation could therefore be a better choice in patients with distal radius fractures.

Pronator quadratus repair after volar plating of distal radius fractures or not? Results of a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle repair following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures with special regards to the forearm pronation strength. During the early recovery period of 3 months, an improvement of pronation strength and functional scorings was hypothesized for the PQ repair when compared to no repair.

METHODS

The inclusion criteria were (1) men or women between 18 and 80 years, (2) isolated, closed fractures of the distal radius, (3) A2 to B2 types of fracture according to the AO fracture classification system, (4) primary volar locking plate osteosynthesis. Patients were randomized to group A = PQ repair and group B = no repair. Follow-up examinations after 6 and 12 weeks included bilateral isometric pronation strength measurement, range of motion, the QuickDASH and the Mayo-Wrist-Score, and a visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

60 patients (n = 31 in group A and n = 29 in group B) with an average age of 54 years (range 22-77 years) returned for both follow-up visits. The pronation strength measurements showed no significant differences between groups (PQ repair vs. no repair) neither at 6 weeks nor at 12 weeks. Additionally, no statistical significant differences were noted for ROM, QuickDASH-Score or Mayo-Wrist-Score. The VAS scoring revealed a significant decreased pain level after PQ repair at 6 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

An improved pronation strength after PQ repair in the early rehabilitation period could not be confirmed. However, the PQ repair might reduce pain in the early postoperative period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02595229 (ClinicalTrials.gov, registered 02 November 2015).

External fixation in the elderly

Orthopaedic trauma is an increasingly common problem in geriatric patients. As demands of daily life and recreational activities are increasing in these patients, surgeons need to be able to manage geriatric fractures to achieve good functional results. Reduced bone quality in the elderly presents a considerable challenge and may preclude the use of established surgical stabilisation techniques that are performed in younger trauma patients. Furthermore, pre-existing medical conditions and considerable comorbidities in the elderly could complicate standard surgical procedures that younger patients would be offered. In this respect, application of external fixators represents a validated, minimally-invasive treatment opportunity. This review article summarises the use of external fixation in geriatric trauma patients for wrist fractures, proximal femoral fractures, pelvic fractures, and ankle fractures. Modern modifications, like pin coating with hydroxyapatite, and aspects of pin care will be discussed.