Results of grafting the anterior and posterior divisions of the upper trunk in complete palsies of the brachial plexus

Functional outcome and histologic analysis of late onset total type brachial plexus injury treated with intercostal nerve transfer to median nerve with local umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells or secretome injection: a double-blinded, randomized control study

INTRODUCTION

Intercostal nerve transfer is a surgical technique used to restore function in patients with total brachial plexus injury. Stem cell and secretome therapy has been explored as a potential treatment for brachial plexus injuries. This study aimed to compare the functional and histologic outcome of intercostal nerve transfer to median nerve with local stem cells or secretome injection in total type brachial plexus injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a double-blinded, randomized controlled study (RCT). We included patients with neglected total type brachial plexus injury (BPI) who underwent nerve transfer and local injection of either umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSC) or secretome into median nerve-flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) neuromuscular junction (NMJ). We measured preoperative and 8-month postoperative FDS muscle strength, SF-36, DASH score, and histologic assessment. We then analyzed the difference outcome between those two groups.

RESULT

A total of 15 patients were included in this study. Our study found that after nerve transfer and implantation with either UC-MSC or secretome, significant postoperative improvements were observed in physical functioning, role limitations, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, general health, and DASH scores, particularly in the overall cohort and the secretome group. When we compared the mean difference of clinical outcome from preoperative to postoperative between UC-MSC and secretome groups, the UC-MSC group showed better improvement of health change in SF-36 subgroup compared to secretome group. From the analysis, there was no significant difference in the histologic outcomes (inflammation, regeneration, and fibrosis) in overall cohort between preoperative and postoperative cohort. There was also no significant difference in mean change of the histologic outcomes (inflammation, regeneration, and fibrosis) preoperative and postoperatively between UC-MSC and secretome groups.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Implantation of either UC-MSC or secretome along with nerve transfer may provide clinical improvement, while to achieve histologic improvement, further conditioning should be performed.

Injury and Biological Factors Impact Shoulder Function following Autogenous Grafting of Spinal Nerves for Pan-Brachial Plexus Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Shoulder function after spinal nerve grafting in pan-brachial plexus injuries (pan-BPI) is not well described. The authors evaluated shoulder abduction (ABD) and external rotation (ER) after spinal nerve grafting to the suprascapular nerve, axillary nerve, or posterior division of the upper trunk and determined patient characteristics, injury severity and characteristics, and nerve graft factors that influenced outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 362 patients undergoing pan-BPI reconstruction and spinal nerve grafting for shoulder reanimation in a single institution between 2001 and 2018 were reviewed. Patient demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), graft characteristics, strength, range of motion for shoulder ABD and ER, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on recovery of shoulder function: no return, ABD only, and ABD and ER.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients underwent spinal nerve grafting, with 41 meeting inclusion criteria. Seventeen (41.5%) had no return of shoulder function, 14 (34.1%) had ABD alone, and 10 (24.4%) had ABD and ER. Patients with recovery of both ABD and ER were significantly younger (18.6 ± 5.56 years), had lower body mass index (22.4 ± 4.0), and had a lower ISS (10.5 ± 6.24; P = 0.003). Multivariable analysis found that with increasing age (OR, 0.786; 95% CI, 0.576, 0.941) and ISS (OR, 0.820; 95% CI, 0.606, 0.979), odds for return of ABD and ER decreased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

In pan-BPI, 24.4% of patients demonstrated return of both ABD and ER after spinal nerve grafting to suprascapular nerve and either axillary nerve or posterior division of the upper trunk. Age, body mass index, and ISS were associated with poorer recovery of shoulder function. Careful patient selection and consideration of age, body mass index, and ISS may improve outcomes of spinal nerve grafting for shoulder reanimation.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Stem cell therapy for traumatic brachial plexus injury

Stem cell therapy is rapidly evolving, with preclinical studies showing various stem cell types successfully promoting peripheral nerve regeneration. Despite the lack of clinical studies demonstrating efficacy and safety, the number of commercial entities marketing and promoting this treatment direct to patients is also increasing. We describe three adult traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) patients who had stem cell therapies prior to consultation in a multidisciplinary brachial plexus clinic. No functional improvement was noted at long-term follow-up despite claims reported by the commercial entities. Considerations and implications of stem cell application in BPI patients are reviewed.

The Outcome of Neurotization of Brachial Plexus Injury in a Tertiary Centre: A Nine-Year Review

Introduction: In neurotization or nerve transfer, a healthy but less valuable nerve is transferred to re-innervate a more important motor territory that has lost its innervation through irreparable damage to its nerve.

Methodology: In this study, the outcomes of surgery were analyzed in relation to the muscle strength, range of motion of the upper limb, and functional outcome. The results were analyzed in 19 patients who were operated on between 2008 and 2016 with adequate follow-up. 

Result: Of the 19 patients (15 complete brachial plexus injuries and four incomplete brachial plexus injuries), 13 patients (68%) recovered partial function after the neurotization surgery. Shoulder abduction and elbow flexion were achieved in 11 patients (58%). Six of the 10 patients (32%) in complete pre-ganglionic brachial plexus injury had recovered partial function. Whereas five of the six patients (83%) in complete post-ganglionic had recovered partial function. In incomplete upper trunk brachial plexus injury, three of the four patients (75%) recovered some function after the neurotization surgery.

Conclusion: Nerve transfer is an effective treatment option to restore the function of the affected upper limb. Neurotization without intervening nerve graft shows better recovery. Earlier surgical intervention at a younger age can yield better outcomes.

Reconstruction of C5-C8 (T1 Hand) Brachial Plexus Paralysis in a Series of 52 Patients

PURPOSE

A C5-C8 brachial plexus root injury, also known as a T1 hand, is associated with paralysis of shoulder abduction or external rotation and elbow flexion, accompanied by variable elbow, wrist, thumb, or finger extension deficits. We report the results of reconstruction for C5-C8 brachial plexus paralysis in 52 patients operated upon within 12 months of injury and having at least 24 months of follow-up.

METHODS

We considered surgery to be indicated if, by the fifth month after trauma, shoulder abduction and external rotation and elbow flexion remained paralyzed. Root grafting was possible in 35% of the patients and was performed concomitantly with nerve transfers. Shoulder motion was reconstructed by transferring the spinal accessory to the suprascapular nerve. Elbow flexion was restored by transferring fascicles from either the median or ulnar nerve to the biceps motor branch. When needed, elbow extension was reconstructed by transferring 1 motor branch of the flexor carpi ulnaris to the triceps lower medial head motor branch. Wrist extension was restored by transferring the distal anterior interosseous nerve to the extensor carpi radialis brevis motor branch.

RESULTS

Within 12 months of injury, we observed preserved or spontaneous recovery of elbow, wrist, finger, and thumb extension in 25%, 12%, 50%, and 68% of patients, respectively. After surgical reconstruction, improved range of motion for shoulder, elbow flexion, and wrist extension scoring at least M3 was present in 90% of our patients. All 10 patients in whom a motor branch of the flexor carpi ulnaris was used for triceps reconstruction recovered elbow extension, while flexor carpi ulnaris function was preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

In approximatively 90% of our patients, distal nerve transfers resulted in functional recovery of shoulder abduction, elbow flexion or extension, and wrist extension.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

A novel dual nerve transfer for restoration of shoulder function and sensory recovery of the hand, in patients with C567 traumatic root avulsion of the brachial plexus

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study is to determine the anatomical viability in cadavers of a novel doble nerve transfer technique for simultaneous reanimation of shoulder abduction and sensory recovery of the hand, in patients with brachial plexus injuries sustaining a C5-C6-C7 roots avulsion. These new transfers should be complemented in the clinical setting with other classic nerve transfers, i.e.: (1) a spinal accessory to suprascapular for shoulder abduction and stability, (2) ulnar nerve fascicles to the biceps branches of the musculocutaneous for elbow flexion, and (3) intercostal to triceps branches for elbow extension.

METHODS

The proposed surgical technique includes (1) transferring motor fascicles of the median nerve (MNF), as donors to the axillary nerve (AN), and (2) the whole medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (MACN) to the lateral contribution (sensory) of the median nerve (LCMN), both without the use of interposed nerve grafts. These techniques were performed in eight cadaveric upper extremities. Analyzed variables were: donor and receptor nerves diameter, length and distance of donor and receptors nerves, and axonal count.

RESULTS

The mean distance between the MNF and its point of coaptation to the AN was 19 mm. The average length of each one of the MNF, after distal dissection, was 46.5 mm. The average diameter of each fascicle of the median nerve at its coaptation point with the axillary nerve was 0.8 mm, while the average diameter of the latter was 3.9 mm. The average distance between the MACN and its point of coaptation to the LCMN, was 16.5 mm. The average diameter of the MACN and the LCMN at their point of coaptation, were 2.7 mm and 3.5 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These nerve transfers are anatomically viable and could be a complement for other currently used techniques that can be employed in severely injured C567 brachial plexus patients.

Nerve Graft Length and Recovery of Elbow Flexion Muscle Strength in Patients With Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries: Case Series

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries cause long-term maiming of patients. The major target function to restore in complex brachial plexus injury is elbow flexion.

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze the correlation between the length of the nerve graft and the strength of target muscle recovery in extraplexual and intraplexual nerve transfers.

METHODS

A total of 51 patients with complete or near-complete brachial plexus injuries were treated with a combination of nerve reconstruction strategies. The phrenic nerve (PN) was used as axon donor in 40 patients and the spinal accessory nerve was used in 11 patients. The recipient nerves were the anterior division of the upper trunk (AD), the musculocutaneous nerve (MC), or the biceps branches of the MC (BBs). An index comparing the strength of elbow flexion between the affected and the healthy arms was correlated with the choice of target nerve recipient and the length of nerve grafts, among other parameters. The mean follow-up was 4 yr.

RESULTS

Neither the choice of MC or BB as a recipient nor the length of the nerve graft showed a strong correlation with the strength of elbow flexion. The choice of very proximal recipient nerve (AD) led to axonal misrouting in 25% of the patients in whom no graft was employed.

CONCLUSION

The length of the nerve graft is not a negative factor for obtaining good muscle recovery for elbow flexion when using PN or spinal accessory nerve as axon donors in traumatic brachial plexus injuries.

Direct Repair of the Lower Trunk to Residual Nerve Roots for Restoration of Finger Flexion After Total Brachial Plexus Injury

PURPOSE

Residual nerve root stumps have been used to neurotize the median nerve in an attempt to restore finger flexion function in patients suffering from total brachial plexus injury. However, the results have been unsatisfactory mainly because of the need to use a long nerve graft. The authors have tried to improve the quality of restored finger flexion by direct approximation of available (ruptured) ipsilateral root stumps to the lower trunk (LT). We sought to validate these results using objective outcome measures.

METHODS

This is a study of 27 cases of total posttraumatic brachial plexus palsies. In each case, the neck was explored and ruptured root stumps identified. The LT was mobilized by separating it from the posterior division and the medial cutaneous nerve of the forearm distally. The mobilized LT was then approximated directly to an ipsilateral root stump. The arm was immobilized against the trunk for 2 months. The patients were observed for return of function in the paralyzed upper limb. The presence and strength of finger flexion was measured using the British Medical Council grading.

RESULTS

The follow-up period was 36 to 74 months (average, 56.9 ± 13.7 months). Recovery of active finger flexion was M4 in 10 patients, M3 in 8 patients, and M2 to M0 in 9 patients. Meaningful recovery (M3 or greater) of finger flexion was achieved in 18 of 27 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of active finger flexion can be improved by direct approximation of the LT to an ipsilateral root stump.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Brain changes after peripheral nerve repair: limitations of neuroplasticity

Neuroplasticity is the capacity of the central nervous system to adapt to external or internal stimuli. It is being increasingly recognized as an important factor which contributes to the successful outcome of nerve transfers. Other much more well-known factors are the number of axons that cross the coaptation site, the interval between trauma and repair, and age. Neuroplasticity is mediated by synaptic and neurotransmitter changes which underlie activation of previously existing but low-active connections in the brain. Dendritic sprouting and axonal elongation might also take place, but is likely less prominent. We review different factors that play a role in neuroplasticity and functional regeneration after specific nerve transfers. These factors include, amongst others, the distance between cortical areas of the donor and receptor neurons; the presence versus absence of pre-existing low-active inter-neuronal connections; gross versus fine movement restoration; rehabilitation; brain trauma and also very important: the age. The potential for plastic adaptation should be taken into consideration if the surgical strategy and post-operative rehabilitation are planned, as its influence on results cannot be denied.

Transfer of the rhomboid nerve for restoration of shoulder external rotation in partial brachial plexus palsy

Restoration of shoulder external rotation in partial brachial plexus palsies is a real challenge. The transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve remains the gold standard. This transfer, however, cannot be always performed. Therefore, in these cases, we previously proposed the transfer of the rhomboid nerve to the suprascapular nerve through a posterior approach. The goal of the present study is to assess this technique through a short series. Eight male patients had a partial plexus palsy. Five patients had C5, C6 root injuries, two patients had C5, C6, C7 root injuries, and one patient had C5 to C8 root injuries. No patients had C5 or C6 root avulsions. In one patient, the spinal accessory nerve was injured and in seven patients, the proximal suprascapular nerve was not available. All patients underwent a transfer from the rhomboid nerve to the suprascapular nerve. Concerning shoulder elevation, transfers from the branch of the long head of the triceps or ulnar nerve fascicle were transferred to the axillary nerve. For elbow flexion, fascicles from the ulnar nerve, median nerve, or both were used. For elbow extension, three intercostal nerves in one patient and one fascicle from the ulnar nerve in two patients were transferred to the branch of the long head of the triceps. For wrist and finger extension, palliative surgery was proposed. All patients recovered external shoulder rotation (from 70-110º) and shoulder elevation (range, 80-140º). Active elbow flexion was coded M4 in seven patients and M3 in one patient. All patients recovered active elbow extension. The transfer of the rhomboid nerve to the suprascapular nerve is an efficient procedure for shoulder external rotation in partial brachial plexus palsies without C5 root avulsion. The results in terms of range-of-motion are, however, poorer than with the spinal accessory nerve. Therefore, this technique is appropriate if the spinal accessory nerve is injured or if the suprascapular nerve is not available in the cervical area. This technique must be associated with another transfer to the axillary nerve for shoulder elevation. The study of more patients will be necessary to confirm these results.

Local Riluzole Release from a Thermosensitive Hydrogel Rescues Injured Motoneurons through Nerve Root Stumps in a Brachial Plexus Injury Rat Model

The C5-C6 nerve roots are usually spared from avulsion after brachial plexus injury (BPI) and can thus be used as donors for nerve repair. A BPI rat model with C5-C6 nerve root stumps has been established in our previous work. The aim of this study was to test whether riluzole loaded into a thermosensitive hydrogel could applied locally in the nerve root stumps of this BPI rat model, thus increasing the reparative effect of the nerve root stumps. Nile red (a hydrophobic dye) was used as a substitute for riluzole since riluzole itself does not emit light. Nile red, loaded into a thermosensitive hydrogel, was added to the nerve root stumps of the BPI rat model. Additionally, eighteen rats, with operation on right brachial plexus, were evenly divided into three groups: control (Con), thermosensitive hydrogel (Gel) and thermosensitive hydrogel loaded with riluzole (Gel + Ri) groups. Direct nerve repair was performed after local riluzole release for two weeks. Functional and electrophysiological evaluations and histological assessments were used to evaluate the reparative effect 8 weeks after nerve repair. Nile red was slowly released from the thermosensitive hydrogel and retrograde transport through the nerve root stumps to the motoneurons, according to immunofluorescence. Discernible functional recovery began earlier in the Gel + Ri group. The compound muscle action potential, ChAT-expressing motoneurons, positivity for neurofilaments and S100, diameter of regenerating axons, myelin sheath thickness and density of myelinated fibers were markedly increased in the Gel + Ri group compared with the Con and Gel groups. Our results indicate that the local administration of riluzole could undergo retrograde transportation through C5-C6 nerve root stumps, thereby promoting neuroprotection and increasing nerve regeneration.

Surgical reconstructions for adult brachial plexus injuries. Part I: Treatments for combined C5 and C6 injuries, with or without C7 injuries

Brachial plexus injuries will cause a significantly decreased quality of life. Patients with upper arm type brachial plexus injuries, which means C5 and C6 roots injury, will lose their shoulder elevation/abduction/external rotation, and elbow flexion function. Additional elbow, wrist, and hand extension function deficit will occur in patients with C7 root injury. With the advances of reconstructive procedures, the upper arm brachial plexus injuries can be successfully restored through nerve repair, nerve grafting, nerve transfer, muscle / tendon transfer and free functioning muscle transfer. In this review article, we summarized the various reconstructive procedures to restore the function of shoulder and elbow. Nowadays, the upper arm type BPI can be treat with satisfied outcomes (80-90% successful rate).

Viable C5 and C6 Proximal Stump Use in Reconstructive Surgery of the Adult Brachial Plexus Traction Injuries

BACKGROUND

In patients with only upper (C5, C6) brachial plexus palsy (BPP), the pooled international data strongly favor nerve transfers over nerve grafts. In patients with complete BPP, some authors favor nerve grafts for the restoration of priority functions whenever there is a viable proximal stump.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate functional recovery in cases of upper and complete BPP where only direct graft repair from viable proximal stumps was performed.

METHODS

The study included 36 patients (24 with complete BPP and 12 with only upper BPP) operated on over a 15-yr period. In all cases, direct graft repair from C5 to the musculocutaneous and the axillary nerve was performed. In cases with complete BPP, additional procedures included either direct graft repair from C6 to the radial nerve and the medial pectoral nerve or the dorsal scapular nerve transfer to the branch for the long head of the triceps.

RESULTS

The use of C5 proximal stump grafts (in both complete and upper BPP) resulted in satisfactory elbow flexion in 26 patients (72.2%) and satisfactory shoulder abduction in 22 patients (61.1%). The use of C6 proximal stump grafts in patients with complete BPP resulted in satisfactory elbow extension in 5 (50%) and satisfactory shoulder adduction in another 5 (50%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Although nerve transfers generally enable better restoration of priority functions, in cases of infraganglionary injuries, especially in shorter defects, it is also necessary to consider direct graft repair, or at least its combination with nerve transfers, as a potentially beneficial treatment modality.

Distal Nerve Transfers to the Triceps Brachii Muscle: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

To report the clinical outcomes and describe the surgical technique of triceps muscle reinnervation using 2 different distal nerve transfers: the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) fascicle of the ulnar nerve and the posterior branch of the axillary nerve (PBAN) to the triceps nerve branch.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing FCU fascicle of ulnar nerve or PBAN to triceps nerve branch transfer was performed. Outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative modified British Medical Research Council (MRC) score, EMG results, and complications.

RESULTS

Between September 2003 and April 2017, 6 patients were identified. Four patients with a traumatic upper trunk and posterior cord palsy underwent ulnar nerve fascicle to triceps nerve transfer. Two patients with a recovering upper trunk following a pan-brachial plexus palsy underwent PBAN to triceps nerve branch transfer. The median age was 30.0 years (range, 18-68 years). Surgery was performed at a median of 6.9 months (range, 5.0-8.9 months) postinjury, with a median follow-up of 18.4 months (range, 7.6-176.3) months. Before surgery, 4 patients exhibited grade M0 and 2 patients exhibited grade M1 triceps strength. Four patients had M5 donor muscle strength and 2 had grade M4. Postoperatively, 4 patients regained MRC grade M4 triceps muscle strength, 1 regained M3, and 1 regained M2. There was no noticeable donor muscle weakness.

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve fascicles to the FCU and PBAN are viable options for obtaining meaningful triceps muscle recovery in a select group of patients.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic V.

Combined flexor carpi ulnaris and flexor carpi radialis transfer for restoring elbow function after brachial plexus injury

The result of combined agonist and antagonist muscle innervation in traumatic brachial plexus injury through the intraplexal fascicle nerve transfers with the same donor function has not yet been reported. We describe a patient with a C5-C7 traumatic brachial plexus injury who had a combined transfer of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) fascicle to the musculocutaneous nerve and the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) fascicle to the radial nerve of the triceps. The patient returned for his follow-up visit 2 years after his surgery. The muscle strengths of his triceps and biceps were Medical Research Council grade 2 and 0, respectively. Compared with his uninjured side, his grip strength was 9.8%, and his pinch strength was 14.2%. Our case report provides insights on result of combined agonist and antagonist muscle innervation through combining the motor fascicle of the FCR and FCU to restore the elbow flexor and extensor. The result may not be promising.

Elbow flexion reconstruction with nerve transfer or grafting in patients with brachial plexus injuries: A systematic review and comparison study

INTRODUCTION

Posttraumatic brachial plexus (BP) palsy was used to be treated by reconstruction with nerve grafts. For the last two decades, nerve transfers have gained popularity and believed to be more effective than nerve grafting. The aim of this systematic review was to compare elbow flexion restoration with nerve transfers or nerve grafting after traumatic BP injury.

METHODS

PRISMA-IPD structure was used for 52 studies included. Patients were allocated as C5-C6 (n = 285), C5-C6-C7 (n = 150), and total BP injury (n = 245) groups. In each group, two treatment modalities were compared, and effects of age and preoperative interval were analyzed.

RESULTS

In C5-C6 injuries, 93.1% of nerve transfer patients achieved elbow flexion force ≥M3, which was significantly better when compared to 69.2% of nerve graft patients (p < 0.001). For improved outcomes of nerve transfer patients, shorter preoperative interval was a significant factor in all injury patterns (p < 0.001 for C5-C6 injuries and total BP injuries, p = 0.018 for C5-C6-C7 injuries), and young age was a significant factor in total BP injury pattern (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analyses showed that nerve transfers appear superior to nerve graftings especially in patients with a C5-C6 injury. Unnecessary delays in surgery must be prevented, and younger patients may have more chance for better recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Mechanisms, Treatment, and Patient Outcome of Iatrogenic Injury to the Brachial Plexus-A Retrospective Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Injury to the brachial plexus is a devastating condition, with severe impairment of upper extremity function resulting in distinct disability. There are no systematic reports on epidemiology, causative mechanisms, treatment strategies. or outcomes of iatrogenic brachial plexus injury (iBPI).

METHODS

We screened all cases of iatrogenic nerve injuries recorded between 2007 and 2017 at a single specialized institution. Mechanism of iBPI, type of previous causative intervention, location and type of the lesion as well as the type of revision surgery and functional patient outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 14 cases of iBPI, which all presented with significant impairment of upper extremity motor function (at least 1 muscle Medical Research Council grade 0). Neuropathic pain was present in most patients (11/14). Orthopedic shoulder procedures such as rotator cuff fixation, arthroplasty, and repositioning of a clavicle fracture accounted for iBPI in 7 of 14 patients. Other reasons for iBPI were resection or biopsy of a peripheral nerve sheath tumor in 3 patients or lymph node situated at the cervicomediastinal area in 2 patients. Mechanisms also included transaxillary rib resection in one and sternotomy in another patient. The treatment of iBPI was conducted according to each individual's needs and included neurolysis in 4, nerve grafting in 9, and nerve transfers in 1 patient. We found improved symptoms after treatment in most patients (11/14).

CONCLUSIONS

Most common causes for iBPI were shoulder surgery and resection or biopsy of peripheral nerve sheath tumor and lymph nodes. Early referral to specialized peripheral nerve centers may help to improve functional patient outcome.

Current concepts in plasticity and nerve transfers: relationship between surgical techniques and outcomes

OBJECTIVE Neuroplasticity is analyzed in this article as the capacity of the CNS to adapt to external and internal stimuli. It is being increasingly recognized as an important factor for the successful outcome of nerve transfers. Better-known factors are the number of axons that cross the coaptation site, the time interval between trauma and repair, and age. Neuroplasticity is mediated initially by synaptic and neurotransmitter changes. Over time, the activation of previously existing but lowly active connections in the brain cortex contributes further. Dendritic sprouting and axonal elongation might also take place but are less likely to be prominent. METHODS The authors reviewed different factors that play roles in neuroplasticity and functional regeneration after specific nerve transfers. RESULTS The authors found that these different factors include, among others, the distance between cortical areas of the donor and receptor neurons, the presence versus absence of preexisting lowly active interneuronal connections, gross versus fine movement restoration, rehabilitation, brain trauma, and age. CONCLUSIONS The potential for plasticity should be taken into consideration by surgeons when planning surgical strategy and postoperative rehabilitation, because its influence on results cannot be denied.

The SPA arrangement of the branches of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus: a correction of a longstanding misconception and a new diagram of the brachial plexus

OBJECT

Brachial plexus (BP) diagrams in most textbooks and papers represent the branches and divisions of the upper trunk (UT) in the following sequence from cranial to caudal: suprascapular nerve, anterior division, and then posterior division. This concept contradicts what is seen in the operating room and is noticed by most peripheral nerve surgeons. This cadaveric study was conducted to look specifically at the exact pattern of branching of the upper trunk of the BP.

METHODS

Ten cadavers (20 BPs) were dissected. Both supra- and infraclavicular exposures were performed. The clavicle was retracted or resected to identify the divisions of the BP. A posterior approach was used in 2 cases.

RESULTS

In all dissections the origin of the posterior division was in a more cranial and dorsal plane in relation to the anterior division. In most dissections the supra scapular nerve branched off distally from the UT, giving it the appearance of a trifurcation, taking off just cranial and dorsal to the posterior division. The branching pattern of the UT consistently had the following sequential arrangement from cranial and posterior to caudal and anterior: suprascapular nerve (S), posterior division (P), and anterior division (A), hence the acronym SPA.

CONCLUSIONS

Supraclavicular exposure of the BP exposes only the trunks and divisions. Recognizing the “SPA” arrangement of the branches helps in identifying the correct targets for neurotization, especially given that these 3 branches are the most common targets for BP repair. Understanding the anatomy means better surgical planning and better patient outcomes.

Brachial plexus reconstruction following resection of a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: case report

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

The main therapeutic approach for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) of the brachial plexus is wide local excision. Sacrifice of some--occasionally all--elements of the brachial plexus often is required to obtain complete resection, and therefore can be associated with significant morbidity. While peripheral nerve repair is commonly used in the setting of traumatic nerve injury, little is known about its potential use in the treatment of MPNST.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

We present a patient with an enlarging right neck mass who was diagnosed with MPNST of the brachial plexus. The patient underwent gross total resection of the tumor, requiring sectioning of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus, as well as associated divisions. Following resection, sural nerve grafts were used to connect the C5 nerve root to the anterior division of the upper trunk and the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve, whereas a triceps branch of the radial nerve was coapted directly to the anterior division of the axillary nerve.

CONCLUSION

By 20 months after surgery, the patient had regained significant strength in her upper trunk distribution and demonstrated no evidence of tumor recurrence. Brachial plexus reconstruction offers a potentially valuable surgical adjunct to MPNST treatment.

Upper brachial plexus injuries: grafts vs ulnar fascicle transfer to restore biceps muscle function

BACKGROUND

Nerve transfers or graft repairs in upper brachial plexus palsies are 2 available options for elbow flexion recovery.

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcomes of biceps muscle strength when treated either by grafts or nerve transfer.

METHODS

A standard supraclavicular approach was performed in all patients. When roots were available, grafts were used directed to proximal targets. Otherwise, a distal ulnar nerve fascicle was transferred to the biceps branch. Elbow flexion strength was measured with a dynamometer, and an index comparing the healthy arm and the operated-on side was developed. Statistical analysis to compare both techniques was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (34 men) were included in this series. Mean age was 28.7 years (standard deviation, 8.7). Twenty-two patients (62.8%) presented with a C5-C6 injury, whereas 13 patients (37.2%) had a C5-C6-C7 lesion. Seventeen patients received reconstruction with grafts, and 18 patients were treated with a nerve transfer from the ulnar nerve to the biceps. The trauma to surgery interval (mean, 7.6 months in both groups), strength in the healthy arm, and follow-up duration were not statistically different. On the British Medical Research Council muscle strength scale, 8 of 17 (47%) patients with a graft achieved ≥ M3 biceps flexion postoperatively, vs 16 of 18 (88%) post nerve transfers (P = .024). This difference persisted when a muscle strength index assessing improvement relative to the healthy limb was used (P = .031).

CONCLUSION

The results obtained from ulnar nerve fascicle transfer to the biceps branch were superior to those achieved through reconstruction with grafts.

Posterior branch of the axillary nerve transfer to the lateral triceps branch for restoration of elbow extension: case report

We report a nerve transfer to the triceps using the posterior branch of the axillary nerve to restore elbow extension in an 18-year-old woman with a C7-T1 injury. Elbow extension strength improved from M0 to M4, whereas deltoid strength was minimally affected. Her Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score improved 14 points. This method may be considered for restoring triceps function in lower pattern brachial plexus injury.

A systematic review of nerve transfer and nerve repair for the treatment of adult upper brachial plexus injury

Nerve reconstruction for upper brachial plexus injury consists of nerve repair and/or transfer. Current literature lacks evidence supporting a preferred surgical treatment for adults with such injury involving shoulder and elbow function. We systematically reviewed the literature published from January 1990 to February 2011 using multiple databases to search the following: brachial plexus and graft, repair, reconstruction, nerve transfer, neurotization. Of 1360 articles initially identified, 33 were included in analysis, with 23 nerve transfer (399 patients), 6 nerve repair (99 patients), and 4 nerve transfer + proximal repair (117 patients) citations (mean preoperative interval, 6 ± 1.9 months). For shoulder abduction, no significant difference was found in the rates ratio (comparative probabilities of event occurrence) among the 3 methods to achieve a Medical Research Council (MRC) scale score of 3 or higher or a score of 4 or higher. For elbow flexion, the rates ratio for nerve transfer vs nerve repair to achieve an MRC scale score of 3 was 1.46 (P = .03); for nerve transfer vs nerve transfer + proximal repair to achieve an MRC scale score of 3 was 1.45 (P = .02) and an MRC scale score of 4 was 1.47 (P = .05). Therefore, for elbow flexion recovery, nerve transfer is somewhat more effective than nerve repair; however, no particular reconstruction strategy was found to be superior to recover shoulder abduction. When considering nerve reconstruction strategies, our findings do not support the sole use of nerve transfer in upper brachial plexus injury without operative exploration to provide a clear understanding of the pathoanatomy. Supraclavicular brachial plexus exploration plays an important role in developing individual surgical strategies, and nerve repair (when donor stumps are available) should remain the standard for treatment of upper brachial plexus injury except in isolated cases solely lacking elbow flexion.

Grafting the C5 Root to the Musculocutaneous Nerve Partially Restores Hand Sensation in Complete Palsies of the Brachial Plexus

BACKGROUND:

In complete brachial plexus palsy, we have hypothesized that grafting to the musculocutaneous nerve should restore some hand sensation because the musculocutaneous nerve can drive hand sensation directly or via communication with the radial and median nerves.

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate sensory recovery in the hand and forearm after C5 root grafting to the musculocutaneous nerve in patients with a total brachial plexus injury.

METHODS:

Eleven patients who had recovered elbow flexion after musculocutaneous nerve grafting from a preserved C5 root and who had been followed for a minimum of 3 years were screened for sensory recovery in the hand and forearm. Six matched patients who had not undergone surgery served as controls. Methods of assessment included testing for pain sensation using Adson forceps, cutaneous pressure threshold measurements using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, and the static 2-point discrimination test. Deep sensation was evaluated by squeezing the first web space, and thermal sensation was assessed using warm and cold water.

RESULTS:

All grafted patients recovered sensation in a variable territory extending from just over the thenar eminence to the entire lateral forearm and hand. Seven patients were capable of perceiving 2-0 monofilament pressure on the thenar eminence, palm, and dorsoradial aspect of the hand. All could differentiate warm and cold water. None recovered 2-point discrimination. None of the patients in the control group recovered any kind of sensation in the affected limb.

CONCLUSION:

Grafting the musculocutaneous nerve can restore nociceptive sensation on the radial side of the hand.

Use of long autologous nerve grafts in brachial plexus reconstruction: factors that affect the outcome

BACKGROUND

Using grafts directed to distal targets in brachial plexus reconstruction has the advantage over proximal targets of avoiding axonal dispersion. A long graft (more than 10 cm) is needed to reach most distal targets. The objective of this article is to identify factors associated with good versus poor outcomes in a clinical series of long grafts used for distal brachial plexus reconstruction.

METHODS

In 34 patients with a flail arm, 47 sural grafts >10 cm long were followed for ≥2 years postoperatively. Surgical technique included standard supraclavicular exposure of the proximal brachial plexus and its branches, the phrenic nerve and spinal accessory nerve. Distal target nerves were exposed via an incision starting at the axilla, following the gap between the biceps and triceps. Cases achieving a good result were statistically compared against those with a poor result as to the donor nerve/root, target nerve, patient age and weight, time from trauma to surgery, graft length and long-term rehabilitation quality.

FINDINGS

A good outcome was observed with 23 grafts (48.9%), but 66.7% of the 30 long grafts done within 6 months of trauma yielded a good result. Only 1 of 15 patients with the lowest quality rehabilitation score experienced a good result (6.6%) versus all 12 patients with the highest rating (p < 0.001). Trauma-to-surgery time was roughly half as long in those with a good result (4.7 vs. 9.0 months, p < 0.001). No other inter-group differences were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of a series of distal brachial plexus target reinnervations with long grafts is presented and analyzed. According to them, time from trauma to surgery and an adequate postoperative rehabilitation are important predictors of outcome.

Electrophysiological study of the dominant motor innervation to the extensor digitorum communis muscle and long head of triceps brachii at posterior divisions of brachial plexus

BACKGROUND

Restoration of elbow and finger extension function is still challenging in management of complete brachial plexus avulsion injury, mainly because of fewer available donor nerves for transfer to the radial nerve. Selective neurotization could be a potentially alternative for overcoming this dilemma. This study was designed to identify the innervation dominance of the extensor digitorum communis muscle (EDCM) and long head of the triceps brachii (LTB) at the level of division of brachial plexus.

METHODS

From February 2008 to October 2009, 17 patients with complete brachial plexus avulsion injury underwent the procedure of contralateral C7 nerve root transfer. The posterior divisions of brachial plexus on the healthy donor side were intraoperatively stimulated and the compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) from the extensor digitorum communis muscle and long head of triceps brachii were recorded by an electrophysiological device.

RESULTS

In 13 out of 17 patients (76.5%), the maximal amplitude of CMAP from EDCM was induced by stimulation of the posterior division of lower trunk (PDLT). The mean amplitudes of CMAP from EDCM with stimulation of the posterior division of upper trunk (PDUT), middle trunk (PDMT), and PDLT were 0.64 ± 0.95, 1.64 ± 1.56, and 5.32 ± 4.67 mV (P < 0.05), respectively. The maximal amplitude of CMAP from LTB was induced mainly by stimulation of the PDMT) and PDLT (6 out of 11 and 5 out of 11 patients). The mean amplitudes of CMAP from LTB with stimulation of the PDUT, PDMT, and PDLT were 0.15 ± 0.24, 5.20 ± 4.27, and 7.48 ± 9.90 mV, respectively. The differences of CMAPs between stimulation of PDUT and other two divisions were significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

From the electrophysiological point of view, this study showed that the PDLT was the major motor division innervating EDCM, and the PDMT and PDLT shared the similar proportion of LTB innervation.

Transfer of a Motor Fascicle From the Ulnar Nerve to the Branch of the Radial Nerve Destined to the Long Head of the Triceps for Restoration of Elbow Extension in Brachial Plexus Surgery

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE:

Restoration of elbow extension has not been considered of much importance regarding functional outcomes in brachial plexus surgery; however, the flexion of the elbow joint is only fully effective if the motion can be stabilized, what can be achieved solely if the triceps brachii is coactivated. To present a novel nerve transfer of a healthy motor fascicle from the ulnar nerve to the nerve of the long head of the triceps to restore the elbow extension function in brachial plexus injuries involving the upper and middle trunks.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION:

Case 1 is a 32-year-old man sustaining a right brachial extended upper plexus injury in a motorcycle accident 5 months before admission. The computed tomography myelogram demonstrated avulsion of the C5 and C6 roots. Case 2 is a 24-year-old man who sustained a C5-C7 injury to the left brachial plexus in a traffic accident 4 months before admission. Computed tomography myelogram demonstrated signs of C6 and C7 root avulsion. The technique included an incision at the medial border of the biceps, in the proximal third of the involved arm, followed by identification of the ulnar nerve, the radial nerve, and the branch to the long head of the triceps. The proximal stump of a motor fascicle from the ulnar nerve was sutured directly to the distal stump of the nerve of the long head of the triceps. Techniques to restore elbow flexion and shoulder abduction were applied in both cases. Triceps strength Medical Research Council M4 grade was obtained in both cases.

CONCLUSION:

The attempted nerve transfer was effective for restoration of elbow extension in primary brachial plexus surgery; however, it should be selected only for cases in which other reliable donor nerves were used to restore elbow flexion.

Results and current approach for Brachial Plexus reconstruction

We review our experience treating 335 adult patients with supraclavicular brachial plexus injuries over a 7-year period at the University of Southern Santa Catarina, in Brazil. Patients were categorized into 8 groups, according to functional deficits and roots injured: C5-C6, C5-C7, C5-C8 (T1 Hand), C5-T1 (T2 Hand), C8-T1, C7-T1, C6-T1, and total palsy. To restore function, nerve grafts, nerve transfers, and tendon and muscle transfers were employed. Patients with either upper- or lower-type partial injuries experienced considerable functional return. In total palsies, if a root was available for grafting, 90% of patients had elbow flexion restored, whereas this rate dropped to 50% if no roots were grafted and only nerve transfers performed. Pain resolution should be the first priority, and root exploration and grafting helped to decrease or eliminate pain complaints within a short time of surgery.

Comparison of nerve transfers and nerve grafting for traumatic upper plexus palsy: a systematic review and analysis

BACKGROUND

In treating patients with brachial plexus injury, there are no comparative data on the outcomes of nerve grafts or nerve transfers for isolated upper trunk or C5-C6-C7 root injuries. The purpose of our study was to compare, with systematic review, the outcomes for modern intraplexal nerve transfers for shoulder and elbow function with autogenous nerve grafting for upper brachial plexus traumatic injuries.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies in which patients had surgery for traumatic upper brachial plexus palsy within one year of injury and with a minimum follow-up of twelve months. Strength and shoulder and elbow motion were assessed as outcome measures. The Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare outcomes, with an alpha level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Two hundred and forty-seven (83%) and 286 (96%) of 299 patients with nerve transfers achieved elbow flexion strength of grade M4 or greater and M3 or greater, respectively, compared with thirty-two (56%) and forty-seven (82%) of fifty-seven patients with nerve grafts (p < 0.05). Forty (74%) of fifty-four patients with dual nerve transfers for shoulder function had shoulder abduction strength of grade M4 or greater compared with twenty (35%) of fifty-seven patients with nerve transfer to a single nerve and thirteen (46%) of twenty-eight patients with nerve grafts (p < 0.05). The average shoulder abduction and external rotation was 122° (range, 45° to 170°) and 108° (range, 60° to 140°) after dual nerve transfers and 50° (range, 0° to 100°) and 45° (range, 0° to 140°) in patients with nerve transfers to a single nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with demonstrated complete traumatic upper brachial plexus injuries of C5-C6, the pooled international data strongly favors dual nerve transfer over traditional nerve grafting for restoration of improved shoulder and elbow function. These data may be helpful to surgeons considering intraoperative options, particularly in cases in which the native nerve root or trunk may appear less than optimal, or when long nerve grafts are contemplated.

Reinnervation of the paralyzed diaphragm: application of nerve surgery techniques following unilateral phrenic nerve injury

BACKGROUND

Unilateral phrenic nerve injury often results in symptomatic hemidiaphragm paralysis, and currently few treatment options exist. Reported etiologies include cardiac surgery, neck surgery, chiropractic manipulation, and interscalene nerve blocks. Although diaphragmatic plication has been an option for treatment, the ideal treatment would be restoration of function to the paralyzed hemidiaphragm. The application of peripheral nerve surgery techniques for phrenic nerve injuries has not been adequately evaluated.

METHODS

Twelve patients presenting with long-term, symptomatic, unilateral phrenic nerve injuries following surgery, chiropractic manipulation, trauma, or anesthetic blocks underwent a comprehensive evaluation, including radiographic and electrophysiologic assessments. Surgical treatment was offered following a minimum of 6 months of conservative management. Operative planning was based on preoperative and intraoperative testing using one or more established nerve reconstruction techniques (neurolysis, interpositional grafting, or neurotization).

RESULTS

Measures of postoperative improvement included pulmonary function testing, fluoroscopic sniff testing, and a standardized quality-of-life survey, from which it was determined that eight of nine patients who could be completely evaluated experienced improvements in diaphragmatic function.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the favorable results in this small series, we suggest expanding nerve reconstruction techniques to phrenic nerve injury treatment and propose an algorithm for treatment of unilateral phrenic nerve injury that may expand the current limitations in therapy.

Transfer of the Platysma Motor Branch to the Accessory Nerve in a Patient With Trapezius Muscle Palsy and Total Avulsion of the Brachial Plexus

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE:

To report on the successful use of a platysma motor nerve transfer to the accessory nerve in a patient with concomitant trapezius and brachial plexus palsy.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION:

A 20-year-old man presented with total avulsion of the right brachial plexus combined with palsies of the accessory and phrenic nerve. The patient was operated on 4 months after his injury. The accessory nerve was repaired via direct transfer of the platysma motor branch. The contralateral C7 root was connected to the musculocutaneous nerve, and the hemihypoglossal nerve was grafted to the suprascapular nerve. Two intercostal nerves were attached to the triceps long head motor branch.

CONCLUSION:

Within 20 months of surgery, the patient regained full reinnervation of the upper trapezius muscle. Elbow flexion scored M3+, and 30° active shoulder abduction was observed. Triceps reinnervation was poor. Platysma motor branch transfer to the accessory nerve is a viable alternative to reinnervate the trapezius muscle.

Combined Injury of the Accessory Nerve and Brachial Plexus

BACKGROUND:

Stretch-induced spinal accessory nerve palsy has been considered extremely rare, with only a few cases reported.

OBJECTIVE:

In 357 patients with stretch lesions of the brachial plexus, we investigated the prevalence, course, and surgical treatment of accessory nerve palsy.

METHODS:

Accessory nerve palsy was ascertained when the patient was unable to shrug the ipsilateral shoulder. Patients underwent brachial plexus reconstruction between 6 and 8 months after trauma. To confirm paralysis, during surgery, the accessory nerve was stimulated electrically.

RESULTS:

Accessory nerve palsy occurred in 19 of the 327 patients (6%) with upper type or complete palsy of the brachial plexus. Proximal injuries of the accessory nerve accompanied by voice alteration and complete palsy of the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscle occurred in 2 patients. Proximal palsy without vocal alterations was observed in 6 patients. Palsy of the trapezius muscle with preservation of the sternocleidomastoid muscle occurred in 11 patients. All 7 patients who demonstrated muscle contractions upon electrical stimulation of the accessory nerve during surgery recovered completely. Patients with surgical reconstruction of the accessory nerve through grafting (n = 2) or repair by platysma motor nerve transfer (n = 2) recovered active shoulder shrugging within 36 months of surgery. Seven of the 8 patients without accessory nerve reconstruction recovered from their drop shoulder and head tilt, but remained unable to shrug.

CONCLUSION:

If intraoperative electrical stimulation produces contraction of the upper trapezius muscle, no repair is needed. In proximal injuries, the platysma motor branch should be transferred to the accessory nerve; whereas in paralysis distal to the sternocleidomastoid muscle, the accessory nerve should be explored and grafted.

Reconstruction of complete palsies of the adult brachial plexus by root grafting using long grafts and nerve transfers to target nerves

PURPOSE

We report on the results we obtained with reconstruction for total paralysis of the brachial plexus using long nerve grafts that connect nonavulsed roots to the musculocutaneous and radial nerve. Nerve transfers were performed to restore function of the suprascapular nerve, triceps long head, and pectoralis major muscle.

METHODS

We studied 22 young adults with complete brachial plexus palsy who had surgical repair an average of 5 months after trauma. Nerve grafts connected the C5 root to the musculocutaneous nerve. The C6 root was connected by grafts to the radial nerve. When the C6 root was avulsed, the levator scapulae motor branch was connected by grafts to the triceps long head motor branch. In 13 patients, the platysma motor branch was transferred to the medial pectoralis nerve through a long nerve graft. The suprascapular nerve was repaired through transfer of the accessory nerve. Outcomes were assessed an average of 27 months after surgery, focusing on recovery of muscle strength, categorized using the Medical Research Council scale.

RESULTS

All but one patient recovered some shoulder abduction, with a mean range of recovered shoulder abduction of 57°. Pectoralis major reinnervation was observed in 9 of the 13. Twenty patients recovered full elbow flexion and achieved at least grade M3 strength. Among the 10 patients in whom the C6 root was grafted to the radial nerve, 4 patients recovered active elbow extension with biceps co-contraction. All patients in whom the levator scapulae nerve was connected to the triceps long head recovered active elbow extension, albeit weak. Double lesions of the musculocutaneous nerve were identified in 4 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer, levator scapulae nerve transfer to the triceps long head and C5 root grafting to the musculocutaneous nerve is now our preferred method of reconstruction in total palsies of the brachial plexus.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Neuropathic pain in patients with upper-extremity nerve injury

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review was to present an analysis of the literature of the outcome studies reported in patients following traumatic upper-extremity (UE) nerve injuries (excluding amputation), to assess the presence of an association between neuropathic pain and outcome in patients following traumatic UE nerve injuries, and to provide recommendations for inclusion of more comprehensive outcome measures by clinicians who treat these patients.

SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS

A Medline and CINAHL literature search retrieved 48 articles. This review identified very few studies of patients with peripheral nerve injury that reported neuropathic pain. When pain was reported, visual analogue or numeric rating scales were most frequently used; standardized questionnaires measuring pain or psychosocial function were rarely administered. Recent evidence shows substantial long-term disability and pain in patients following peripheral nerve injury.

RECOMMENDATION

To better understand neuropathic pain in patients following peripheral nerve injury, future outcome studies should include valid, reliable measures of physical impairment, pain, disability, health-related quality of life, and psychosocial functioning.

Results of c5 root grafting to the musculocutaneous nerve using pedicled, vascularized ulnar nerve grafts

PURPOSE

Vascularized nerve grafts are indicated for the repair of large nerve defects. In brachial plexus injuries, the poor prognosis for functional hand reconstruction when the lower roots are avulsed makes the ulnar nerve a potential donor for vascularized nerve grafts. We report on the results we obtained with reconstruction of elbow flexion using long pedicled ulnar nerve grafts that connected the C5 root to the musculocutaneous nerve.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 8 young adults with complete brachial plexus palsy with avulsion of the lower roots, who had surgical repair an average of 4.6 months after trauma. Pedicled ulnar nerve grafts, averaging 30 cm long, connected the C5 root to the musculocutaneous nerve. In order to rescue misdirected axons that could have regenerated into the cutaneous branch of the musculocutaneous nerve, we transferred this branch to the motor branch of the extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle. Outcomes for all 8 patients were assessed an average of 26.7 months after surgery, focusing on recovery of muscle strength, categorized using the Medical Research Council scale.

RESULTS

None of the patients recovered elbow flexion or wrist extension greater than M2.

CONCLUSIONS

In brachial plexus injuries, reconstruction of elbow flexion using a long, pedicled, vascularized nerve graft produces unsatisfactory results.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.