Comparison of the performance of chronically versus freshly denervated autograft in nerve repair

Reverse End-to-Side (Supercharging) Nerve Transfer: Conceptualization, Validation, and Translation

Partial nerve recovery either after expectant observation following an injury in-continuity or after nerve repair is not an uncommon occurrence. Historically, treatment strategies in these situations-late repair, revision repair, or acceptance of a mediocre result-were unsatisfying. The reverse end-to-side, or supercharging, nerve transfer was conceived to offer a more palatable option. Partially validated primarily through small animal research, supercharging has been rapidly translated to clinical practice. Many have extended the indications beyond the original intent, though the final place of this technique in the peripheral nerve surgeon's armamentarium is still yet to be determined.

Effect of Reverse End-to-Side (Supercharging) Neurotization in Long Processed Acellular Nerve Allograft in a Rat Model

PURPOSE

Processed acellular nerve allograft (PNA) has been suggested as a convenient tool for overcoming short and medium nerve defects. Although the clinical implications are unclear, animal data suggest that PNA becomes less effective at longer lengths. Although reverse or supercharging end-to-side nerve transfer may improve the neurotrophic potential in chronically denervated nerve tissue, the application of this strategy to long acellular nerve allograft has not been previously investigated. We hypothesized that supercharging acellular nerve allograft would increase its effective length.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley and Thy1-green fluorescent protein Sprague-Dawley rats underwent transection of the tibial nerve, followed by immediate repair with 20-, 40-, or 60-mm acellular nerve allografts processed identically to commercially available human acellular nerve allograft (AxoGen, Inc., Alachua, FL) or isograft. Half of the allograft group was supercharged with a reverse end-to-side transfer from the ipsilateral peroneal nerve. At 10 weeks, the reconstructed nerve in the Thy1-green fluorescent rat groups were exposed and examined under a fluorescence-enabled microscope. At 20 weeks, the remaining rats underwent motor testing and tissue harvest for morphological examination.

RESULTS

In comparison with a nonenhanced allograft, supercharging had a statistically significant positive impact on the reinnervated muscle normalized force generation and distal axon counts for all graft sizes. Muscles in the supercharged group were heavier than those in the allograft group for the 40-mm-length grafts and G-ratio measurements were higher in the supercharged allograft group for 60-mm-length grafts only.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports that hypothesis that supercharging nerve transfer improves axon regeneration within PNA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

When an appropriate donor nerve is available, supercharging nerve transfer may improve nerve regeneration in PNA across long nerve defects.

Does partial muscle reinnervation preserve future re-innervation potential?

INTRODUCTION

Late revision nerve surgery for incomplete motor recovery due to partial reinnervation would improve muscle function if all muscle fibers were protected from developing denervation atrophy.

METHODS

Sixty immature Sprague-Dawley rats underwent the following tibial nerve manipulations (n = 15/group): group A, partial denervation (two thirds of nerve resected and the remaining one third crushed), revision repair at 8 months; group B, partial denervation; group C, complete denervation, immediate reconstruction; group D, complete denervation, reconstruction at 8 months; and group E, control. Final testing at 11 months included muscle force, weight, and histology.

RESULTS

Muscle weight was significantly (P < 0.05) different among all groups (highest to lowest: E > B > C > A > D), and force was significantly lower in groups A and D compared with E. Muscle fiber cross-sectional area was statistically smaller in group A than in groups B, C, or E.

DISCUSSION

Partial reinnervation still allowed substantial muscle recovery, but it did not preserve the non-innervated muscle fibers. Muscle Nerve 56: 1143-1148, 2017.

A chronically-denervated versus a freshly-harvested autograft for nerve repair in rats

Objectives

Autologous nerve grafting remains the gold standard for repair of peripheral nerve injuries. Its use, however, is limited by donor nerve availability and donor site morbidity. This is especially problematic after failure of an initial autograft that requires a repeat nerve graft, resulting in a second surgical site with associated morbidity. Based on the molecular differences in nerve degeneration in the proximal and distal segments after transection, we hypothesized that a chronically-denervated proximal stump may be viable for autologous nerve repair.

Methods

20 Sprague-Dawley rats underwent right sciatic nerve excision and sural nerve transection. After 8 weeks, nerve repair was performed by harvesting the proximal segment of the sural nerve (n=10) or a fresh sural nerve (n=10) from the contralateral hind limb. Electrophysiological changes were analyzed to compare the fresh and denervated grafts.

Results

Electrophysiological testing demonstrated higher compound motor action potential in the denervated group compared to the fresh autograft group, however this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.117).

Conclusion

The proximal segment of a chronically-denervated sural nerve can be as effective as a fresh sural nerve for autologous repair of peripheral nerve injuries in a rodent model.

Major peripheral nerve injuries

Major peripheral nerve injuries in the upper extremities can result in significant morbidity. Understanding the pathophysiology of these injuries aids in the assessment and planning of appropriate treatment. With limited nerve mobilization, tension-free repairs can often be performed using sutures, fibrin glue, or nerve connectors. Acellular allograft and autograft reconstruction are better for bridging any gaps greater than a few millimeters. Adherence to proper principles of nerve repair improves the chances of achieving a favorable result, although in general these injuries portend a guarded prognosis.