Chronic hand infections

Deep Fungal Infections of the Upper Extremity - A Review

Deep fungal infections are rare in the upper extremity. Vessel and nerve infection, synovitis, tenosynovitis, myofasciitis, arthritis and osteomyelitis have been discovered in literature. Treatment in most cases includes surgical procedure and antifungal agent use. Amputation is the final, most devastating for patient's functionality, solution. Intravenous antifungal drugs, frequently followed by oral administration, are important ancillary agents both for the initial treatment and the prevention of recurrence. We therefore performed a review of the current literature, in order to assemble the dispersed results of different studies and clarify the various aspects of upper extremity fungal infections.

My journey in hand surgery: combining patient care, clinical and basic science research

This review is about my clinical and research journey in hand surgery. The journey has been a worthwhile and meaningful one, especially when I felt there were areas I could influence management, whether this be rare cases, common conditions or where a suggested algorithm may be helpful. I also had the unique privilege of working with geneticists, which has resulted in clinical-pathological publications that could influence patient management, as shared from a clinician's perspective. It is hoped this article will inspire young clinician scientists to pursue a journey of collaboration with other researchers.

Infection Management for the Hand Surgeon

Infections of the upper extremity can be challenging to diagnose and treat because of the complex anatomy and range of offending pathogens. Early recognition of infections that require an emergent surgical intervention, such as necrotizing fasciitis and septic joints, is imperative for good clinical outcomes. In addition, prompt diagnosis and intervention for deep closed space infections, such as deep abscesses or flexor tenosynovitis, is necessary to avoid chronic pain and dysfunction. Complicating factors such as underlying osteomyelitis, atypical pathogens, and immunocompromised states of patients should always be considered when treating upper-extremity infections.

[Atypical bacterial Infections of the Hand]

Atypical infections of the hand are rare and often misdiagnosed. Delay of treatment can lead to irreversible damage, even life-threatening sepsis. The article provides a survey of some of the most frequent atypical infections and their appearance on the hand (Mykobakteria, Vibriones, Francisella, Actinomycetoma), illustrated by two case reports. Knowing the pathogenesis of the most frequent atypical infections allows considering them in the daily practice for differential diagnosis, initiate specific testing, and administer an adequate therapy at an early stage.

Mycobacterium Immunogenum Flexor Tenosynovitis: A Case Report

Background  Nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) flexor tenosynovitis represents a rare but potentially devastating manifestation of upper extremity infection. We present a novel case of NTM flexor tenosynovitis in which Mycobacter iumimmunogenum was found to be the causative agent. Case Description  The patient presented with pain and insidiously progressive swelling and required multiple operative interventions and a complex antimicrobial regimen based on susceptibility profiles. Specifically, our patient was managed with three debridements and empiric antimicrobial agents based on inherent macrolide sensitivity, with later conversion to a complex antimicrobial regimen tailored to sensitivity. Literature Review  The diagnosis and management of NTM tenosynovitis arechallenging because of low suspicion, nonspecific presentation, and cumbersome laboratory identification techniques. M. immunogenum was only characterized in the past two decades, and, to our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the pathogen causing a musculoskeletal infection. Clinical Relevance  We present this case primarily because of the novelty of the organism and to demonstrate the recalcitrant nature of the infection. Due to the extensive resistant patterns of M. immunogenum , management requires complex antimicrobial preparations and almost certainly needs multispecialty collaboration between orthopaedic surgery and infectious diseases.

Mycobacterial Infections in the Hand and Wrist

Mycobacterial hand infections are uncommon. These infections have an indolent course and are marked by variable and nonspecific presentations, often leading to diagnostic and treatment delays. The pathogens involved in mycobacterial hand infections include Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, atypical mycobacteria, and M leprae. Initial treatment involves a combination of long-term antibiotics and surgical débridement to cure the infection. Reconstructive procedures aid in restoring hand function lost secondary to the disease.

Hand Infections Associated with Systemic Conditions

Systemic conditions are associated with higher rates of hand and upper extremity infections, leading to more severe and atypical presentations. Understanding the unique problems associated with some of the most common systemic conditions, including human immunodeficiency virus, diabetes mellitus, and rheumatoid arthritis, can assist the hand surgeon in diagnosing and treating infection in these patients. This article reviews the most common presentation of hand infections for these patients and summarizes current approaches to the management of hand infections for patients with common immunocompromising conditions.

Fungal Infections of the Hand

Clinically significant fungal infections of the upper extremity are uncommon but increasing They are classified based on anatomic location and epidemiology. The anatomic categories that affect the hand include cutaneous, subcutaneous, and deep. Cutaneous infections are caused by organisms that metabolize keratin and can cause serious morbidity but are rarely fatal. Subcutaneous infections are similar to the cutaneous infections and are produced by low virulence organisms. Cutaneous and subcutaneous infections are most common and can be treated by primary care physicians and dermatologists. Deep infections are less common but can be fatal. Epidemiologic classifications include endemic and opportunistic infections.

Hand Infections

Infections are common in hand surgery and proper management is important to achieve optimal outcomes. Although most cases are not urgent, less common, severe infections such as flexor tenosynovitis and necrotizing fasciitis require urgent identification with both medical and surgical management. It is common for diagnoses to be missed or delayed because clinical and laboratory indicators are often variably present. Delayed identification and management can result in poor outcomes with permanent deficits. This article will provide a review of hand infections with a focus on identifying serious hand infections requiring urgent or emergent treatment, and distinguishing these from less urgent scenarios.

Atypical Mycobacterial Infections of the Upper Extremity

Atypical mycobacterial infections of upper extremity synovial-lined structures are often misdiagnosed and unrecognized. Despite an increasing incidence, lack of physician awareness of these pathogens may result in considerable delay in diagnosis and management, potentially leading to permanent disability. The authors conducted a literature review and analyzed 31 cases of penetrating atypical mycobacterial infection to better understand the clinical characteristics and to evaluate their posttreatment complication rate compared with available literature. Medical records for culture-positive cases of tenosynovial or intra-articular atypical mycobacterial infections of the upper extremity that were treated were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment outcomes were analyzed against published case reviews and case series. Thirty-one cases of penetrating atypical mycobacterial infection were identified. Mycobacterium marinum (n=11) was the most common organism and was associated with aquatic exposure. Twenty-eight cases received empiric treatment, 17 of which received contraindicated treatment. Patients saw an average of 5 physicians prior to receiving an accurate diagnosis, and the mean time to diagnosis was 10 months. All cases received antibiotic treatment in addition to surgical management. Twenty cases (68%) failed treatment outcomes. Delay in diagnosis and inappropriate management of atypical mycobacterial infections may lead to a treatment failure rate that is higher than what has been reported in the literature. Mycobacterium avium and M fortuitum had significantly higher failure rates than other organisms. A high index of suspicion is required to make a diagnosis and prevent residual disability. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(3):e383-e388.].

Acute Deep Infections of the Upper Extremity: The Utility of Obtaining Atypical Cultures in the Presence of Purulence

PURPOSE

In the setting of acute deep upper extremity infections, evidence is lacking to guide the decision whether to send atypical cultures (fungal and acid-fast-bacillus [AFB]) during surgical debridement, especially in the presence of purulent fluid that is commonly observed with typical bacterial infections. Our purpose was to determine the frequency of positive atypical cultures and the frequency with which they alter treatment, and identify factors associated with positive atypical cultures.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 100 adult patients undergoing surgical debridement of acute deep infections of the upper extremity in which fungal and/or AFB cultures were sent. Necrotizing and superficial infections were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to describe patient characteristics, infection diagnoses, number of cultures sent with corresponding rates of positivity, and treatments. Cohorts with positive and negative atypical cultures were compared with bivariate analysis for all collected variables.

RESULTS

One or more immunocompromising comorbidities were present in 46% of patients. Diagnoses included soft tissue abscess (46%), suppurative flexor tenosynovitis (22%), septic arthritis (21%), osteomyelitis (9%), and septic bursitis (2%). Aerobic bacterial, anaerobic bacterial, fungal, and AFB cultures were sent in 100%, 99%, 94%, and 82% of patients, respectively. Corresponding rates of positivity were 74%, 34.3%, 5.3%, and 2.4%, respectively. Atypical cultures were positive for 7% of patients and 2.9% of all atypical tests sent. Antibiotic treatment was influenced by atypical culture data for 4% of patients. For patients with positive atypical cultures, purulence was observed during surgery in 86% of cases. Bivariate analysis demonstrated symptom duration greater than 7 days as potentially associated with atypical culture positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative purulence at the time of surgical intervention should not deter the surgeon from obtaining atypical cultures. As expected, atypical cultures are infrequently positive given the rarity of associated diseases. Symptoms greater than 7 days may predict a higher incidence of atypical culture positivity for patients being treated surgically within 30 days of initial symptom onset.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic IV.

Atypical Hand Infections

Atypical infections of the hand are caused by organisms such as Mycobacterium, fungi, and viruses, and often do not respond to conventional management. They exist within a wide spectrum of presentations, ranging from cutaneous lesions to deep infections such as tenosynovitis and osteomyelitis. Having a high clinical suspicion for atypical hand infections is vital because diagnosis often requires special tests and/or cultures. Obtaining a detailed medical, work, and travel history is extremely important. An indolent clinical course, late diagnosis, and delayed treatment are common. In addition to medical therapies, surgical debridement is often required to effectively treat these infections.

Acral manifestations of fungal infections

Fungal infections, which are named according to the body site involved, can affect any skin area, the fingernails, or the toenails. Numerous fungal agents are responsible for both superficial and deep fungal diseases. Dermatophytes and Candida spp are the most common causative organisms on the surface of the hands, feet, and nails of patients with superficial fungal diseases; however, although deep fungal infections of the skin are less common compared with superficial fungal diseases, their incidence is increasing worldwide due to cross-border travel. Most superficial fungal diseases are diagnosed clinically, but sometimes direct microscopic examination with potassium hydroxide and fungal culture may be necessary for diagnosis, especially in patients suspected of having tinea incognito. In cases of superficial fungal infections except for onychomycosis and tinea incognito, topical treatments are usually sufficient and effective, but systemic treatments may be required in recalcitrant cases. Deep fungal diseases may resemble each other clinically; therefore, the organism must be identified with laboratory methods and should be treated for a long period. We review the most important clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects of fungal diseases. This paper covers fungal problems encountered both in hospitals and in general practice.

Stability of the distal phalanx fracture - A biomechanical study on the importance of the nail and the influence of fixation by crossing Kirschner wires

BACKGROUND

With respect to the stability of displaced distal-phalanx fracture, the relevance of nail loss and the biomechanical effects of fixation using crossed Kirschner wires have not been investigated. The present study aimed to determine whether the nail or the type of fixation contributes to stabilizing distal-phalanx fracture.

METHODS

In 48 specimens (fingers), a model of the comminuted fracture of the distal phalanx (AO type A3) was created by resecting a 1-mm osseous segment from the distal phalanx. Specimens were assigned to one of four groups, depending on whether the fracture was accompanied with nail loss, and whether the fracture fixation employed a single Kirschner wire or a crossing of two Kirschner wires. Each specimen was subjected to either a bending or a torsion test.

FINDINGS

Regardless of the fixation form, the mean peak bending and torsion forces were higher for the specimens with the nail intact. Furthermore, these forces were also higher in specimens which had received fixations based on the Kirschner wires, compared to those specimens which had received fixations based on a single Kirschner wire. The highest mean peak torque 1.39 (0.12) N·m was found for the specimens with no nail loss and fixation using two crossed Kirschner wires, while the lowest mean peak torsion 0.46 (0.02) N·m was found for specimens with nail loss and fixation using a single Kirschner wire.

INTERPRETATION

Our results suggest that the nail can provide additional stability for comminuted fractures of the distal phalanx after fixation. Furthermore, when nail loss occurs, fixation using two crossed Kirschner wires can provide significantly more stability than fixation using single Kirschner wire.