Clinical Outcomes of the Flexor Carpi Ulnaris Turnover Flap for Posterior Elbow Soft Tissue Defects

The Use of a Novel Chimeric Flexor Carpi Ulnaris and Ulnar Artery Flap for Elbow Coverage

Elbow defects have a number of etiologies and present a difficult task for the reconstructive surgeon. A number of reconstructive options have been previously reported. We describe a case of a 54-year-old woman with a recurrent elbow defect secondary to prior trauma, surgical fixation, and infection. This was successfully managed with a novel chimeric flexor capri ulnaris and ulnar artery flap for coverage of the defect, which has not been previously described. This may serve as a useful guide for surgeons moving forward.

Wound Complications Following Olecranon Fracture Fixation: Implant and Soft Tissue Considerations

BACKGROUND

The aim of this multicenter, retrospective, case-control series was to investigate patient- and treatment-specific factors associated with wound breakdown following olecranon fracture fixation.  Methods: We identified patients at our two participating academic centers who were operatively treated for olecranon fractures and those who subsequently underwent a re-operation secondary to postoperative wound breakdown. Demographic and historical information was collected, including BMI and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) scores. The primary outcome measure was the standardized radiographic measurement of plate prominence and soft tissue thickness posterior to the plate tip.  Results: We identified 32 patients who underwent internal fixation and subsequent wound breakdown. This was compared to a cohort of 35 matched controls that did not have wound issues. Cases with wound breakdown were of higher energy, nine being open cases compared to two in the control group (p<0.05). No differences were identified in plate prominence, soft tissue thickness, and plate type.  Conclusions: Wound breakdown following olecranon fracture fixation is more commonly seen in high-energy open injuries. Plate prominence, soft tissue thickness, and patient-specific factors do not correlate with wound breakdown. Further investigation into the factors influencing plate placement and how they may contribute to wound complications is needed.

Brachioradialis muscle flap for posterior elbow defects: a simple and effective solution for the upper limb surgeon

BACKGROUND

Trauma, infection, and posterior surgical approach are the most frequent causes of soft tissue defects of posterior elbow. The brachioradialis (BR) muscle flap is a rotational muscular pedicled flap, and the dominant vascular pedicle arises from the radial recurrent artery in the proximal portion of the muscle. The aim of the study was to present the BR muscle flap as a simple, safe, and effective solution for the treatment of soft tissue defects of the posterior elbow.

METHODS

Five patients (3 males; mean age, 61.4 years; range, 40-73 years) with soft tissue defects of the posterior elbow underwent surgical treatment with the BR muscle flap. The causes of the defects were total elbow arthroplasty and postsurgical infection (n = 2), 1 patient with elbow arthrodesis due to neuropathic arthropathy, and postsurgical infection after open reduction and internal fixation of olecranon fractures (n = 2). All patients had a BR muscle flap and skin grafting. Orthopedic hardware was removed in 3 cases.

RESULTS

At the mean follow-up of 45 months (range, 26-61 months), all patients had viable and functional soft tissue coverage. All patients were free of infection, whereas 1 patient had a posterior elbow discomfort in daily activities. None of the patients reported wrist problems.

CONCLUSIONS

The BR muscle flap is a reliable solution, easy to harvest without requiring microsurgical expertise for small-size posterior elbow defects. It is a 1-stage procedure with no morbidity to the harvest site that provides stable and adequate coverage even in cases with postoperative infection.

Antegrade Posterior Interosseous Flap for Nonhealing Wounds of the Elbow: Anatomical and Clinical Study

Background:

The posterior interosseous artery (PIA) flap has been widely reported to cover defects at the dorsal aspect of the hand. However, the use of this flap to cover elbow defects has been rarely reported. The purpose of this study was to analyze the anatomical feasibility of the PIA flap to cover elbow soft-tissue defects and, additionally, to review the clinical outcomes of patients treated with this flap.

Methods:

An anatomical study was performed on 14 cadaveric specimens to assess the number of PIA perforators at the distal third of the forearm, along with the distance of the perforators from the ulnar styloid. Additionally, the pedicle distance from the pivot point to the lateral epicondyle was recorded. A clinical study in 4 patients with elbow soft-tissue defects treated with the antegrade PIA was also performed to assess viability and clinical outcomes.

Results:

A mean of 3 perforators (range, 2–4) of the PIA were found in the distal third of the forearm. The pedicle distance from the pivot point to the lateral epicondyle was 10 cm (range, 8–11.5 cm). In the clinical study, all cases treated with the antegrade PIA flap showed satisfactory outcomes without loss of the flap or significant partial necrosis.

Conclusion:

In this limited series, the antegrade PIA flap has shown to be a reliable and effective alternative for treatment of soft-tissue defects at the elbow. The PIA perforators in the distal forearm and the pedicle length allow the flap to easily reach the elbow.

Brachioradialis Flap for Soft Tissue Coverage of Posterior Elbow Wounds: Case Report and Surgical Technique

The posterior aspect of the elbow is an area prone to chronic wound complications due to its prominence and the tensile forces resulting from elbow range of motion. In situations in which local wound care fails, various options for soft tissue coverage are available, including the anconeus, lateral arm, radial forearm, extensor carpi radialis longus, and flexor carpi ulnaris flaps. Each option offers unique considerations depending on the complexity and extent of the soft tissue defect. In situations in which coverage of a large defect is required, or when primary soft tissue coverage options fail, an alternative option is the brachioradialis rotational muscle flap. We present a review of the literature, case report, and surgical technique using the brachioradialis muscle for coverage of a large posterior elbow wound after failure of an anconeus flap.

Forearm-Based Turnover Muscle Flaps for Elbow Soft-Tissue Reconstruction: A Comparison of Regional Coverage Based on Distal Flap Perfusion

BACKGROUND

Elbow wounds pose a reconstructive challenge. Prior studies have described the vascular anatomy of both the brachioradialis and flexor carpi ulnaris muscle flaps. The goal of this study was to describe the distal flap perfusion of the flexor carpi radialis, with a direct comparison of the brachioradialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, and flexor carpi radialis muscle flaps for coverage around the elbow.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen upper extremity specimens were dissected for brachioradialis, flexor carpi radialis, and flexor carpi ulnaris flaps. Vascular data from prior studies were combined with our anatomical measurements to determine the area of perfused coverage around the elbow for the brachioradialis and flexor carpi ulnaris. The flexor carpi radialis flap distal vascular perfusion was examined separately with transverse sections at 1-cm intervals after India ink injections to determine distal flap perfusion and elbow coverage. Perfusion data were plotted on x and y axes over the posterior elbow.

RESULTS

The brachioradialis muscle covered an average of 56 percent of the x axis and 7.4 percent of the y axis. The flexor carpi ulnaris muscle covered an average of 90 percent of the elbow along the x axis and 23.3 percent of elbow along the y axis. The flexor carpi radialis covered an average of 34 percent of the x axis and 4.8 percent of the y axis.

CONCLUSION

The flexor carpi ulnaris muscle provides the most versatile and robust coverage over the posterior elbow, followed by the brachioradialis muscle, which consistently provides coverage over the lateral epicondyle.

A new local muscle flap for elbow coverage-the medial triceps brachii flap: anatomy, surgical technique, and preliminary outcomes

BACKGROUND

The medial triceps brachii is vascularized by the middle collateral artery and the arterial circle of the elbow. This vascularization allows a distal pedicled use to cover soft tissue defects of the elbow. We report our experience using this flap to cover traumatic and postsurgical wounds.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a pedicled medial triceps brachii flap procedure between 2008 and 2015 were included. Data concerning characteristics of the patients, wound size, surgical technique, and complications were retrospectively reviewed. An independent observer examined patients and assessed outcome of the coverage procedure: wound healing, scar length, range of elbow motion, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Eight patients were included (70.6 ± 17.7 years old at the time of surgery). All patients had serious comorbidities and risk factors of poor wound healing. Defects were due to postoperative healing complications (5 patients), skin necrosis secondary to an underlying olecranon fracture (1 patient), and direct open fractures (2 patients). Soft tissue defects had a median surface of 17 (14-22) cm². The olecranon was exposed in 7 cases and the medial humeral epicondyle in 1 case. Mean procedure duration was 83 ± 14 minutes. There was no intraoperative or postoperative complication. All patients healed properly at 3 weeks of follow-up. No wound recurrence or surgery-related complication was reported after a median follow-up of 40.5 (21.5-69.5) months.

CONCLUSION

Favorable outcomes in all of our 8 patients make this flap an interesting option to cover small to medium-sized defects of the posterior aspect of the elbow.

Bipedicle Flaps for Posterior Elbow Reconstruction

Chronic posterior elbow soft tissue defects often require soft tissue reconstruction because of exposure of the underlying triceps tendon and proximal ulna. Current options for soft tissue coverage require sacrifice of a local muscle or microsurgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient and surgical outcomes after reconstruction of small-sized to medium-sized (<50 cm) posterior elbow defects with bipedicle advancement flaps. A retrospective chart review was performed for 3 patients who underwent posterior elbow reconstruction with bipedicle flaps. The etiology of the soft tissue elbow defect was chronic infected olecranon bursitis (n=2) and exposed olecranon plate after open fracture (n=1). Patient comorbidities included: diabetes, CREST (Calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, Esophageal dysmotility, Sclerodactyly, Telangiectasia) syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis. The mean patient age at time of reconstruction was 44 years (39 to 51 y), and the mean area of soft tissue defect was 39.3 cm (24 to 54 cm) after debridement of involved tissue. All patients had positive intraoperative cultures and were treated with culture-directed long-term intravenous antibiotics. There were no surgical complications or flap loss. All patients had reepithelialization of the donor site by postoperative week 8 and stable soft tissue coverage of the elbow after surgery at final follow-up with full preoperative elbow range of motion. This technique offers a simple, reliable solution for soft tissue coverage of the posterior elbow using excess local tissue for primary closure of posterior elbow wounds with minimal donor-site morbidity.