Incidence and Risk Factors for Volar Wrist Ganglia in the U.S. Military and Civilian Populations

Ganglions in the Hand and Wrist: Advances in 2 Decades

Ganglion cysts represent the most common soft-tissue mass in the hand and wrist. Ganglion cysts are most commonly encountered at the dorsal or volar aspects of the wrist, although cysts may arise from the flexor tendon sheath, interphalangeal joint, and extensor tendons. Intraosseous and intraneural ganglion cysts have also been described. Diagnosis of ganglion cysts relies primarily on history and physical examination. Transillumination and aspiration of masses may be useful adjuncts to diagnosis. Imaging such as radiography and ultrasonography may be indicated to evaluate for associated conditions, such as degenerative joint disease, or to rule out a solid or heterogeneous mass. Advanced imaging such as MRI is generally reserved for patients in whom occult ganglions, intraosseous ganglions, or solid tumors, including sarcoma, remain a concern. Treatment of ganglion cysts includes observation, aspiration or puncture with possible corticosteroid injection, and surgical excision. Nonsurgical management may result in cyst resolution in over 50% of patients. Surgical excision is associated with recurrence rates of 7% to 39%. Advances in surgical techniques have allowed surgeons to conduct arthroscopic ganglion excision, with recurrence rates similar to those of open management. This study highlights the advances in diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes that have taken place over the past 2 decades for this common condition affecting the hand and wrist in the adult population.

Prospective Evaluation of Push-up Performance and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Open Dorsal Wrist Ganglion Excision in the Active-Duty Military Population

Background  Dorsal wrist ganglia (DWG) are a common wrist pathology that affects the military population. This study prospectively evaluates push-up performance, functional measures, and patient-reported outcomes 6 months after open DWG excision in active-duty patients. Methods  Twenty-seven active-duty patients were enrolled and 18 had complete follow-up. Included patients had DWG diagnosis, unilateral involvement, and no previous surgery. The number of push-ups performed within 2 minutes was measured preoperatively and at 6 months. Range of motion (ROM), grip strength, Pain Catastrophization Scale (PCS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, Mayo Wrist Score, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were measured preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Results  Push-up performance did not significantly change overall. Wrist flexion, extension, and radial deviation returned to preoperative ranges. Wrist ulnar deviation significantly increased from preoperative range. Grip strength deficit between operative and unaffected extremities significantly improved to 0.7 kg at 6 months from preoperative deficit of 2.7 kg. Mean scores significantly improved for the validated outcome measures-PCS from 6.3 to 0.67, VAS pain scores from 1.37 to 0.18, DASH scores from 12.8 to 4.3, and Mayo Wrist Scores from 80.3 to 89.4. No surgical complications or recurrences were reported. Conclusions  Findings suggest that almost half of active patients may improve push-up performance after DWG excision at 6 months. Significant improvements were seen in wrist pain, ROM, grip strength, and all patient-reported outcomes, which is useful when counseling patients undergoing excision.

Prevalence of Ganglion Cyst Formation After Wrist Arthroscopy: A Retrospective Longitudinal Analysis of 2420 Patients

BACKGROUND

Dorsal wrist ganglion cysts arise from the leakage of synovial fluid through tears in the scapholunate ligament and/or dorsal wrist capsule. An analogous disruption of the dorsal capsule is created with routine portal placement during wrist arthroscopy. We hypothesized that wrist arthroscopy would predispose to wrist ganglions.

METHODS

Using the Truven MarketScan Outpatient Services Database from 2015 to 2016, patients who underwent wrist arthroscopy and developed an ipsilateral wrist ganglion were identified. Exclusion criteria included ganglion diagnosis preceding arthroscopy and bilateral pathology. Postoperative ganglion diagnosis was modeled with logistic regression. Predictor variables included age, gender, comorbidities, and arthroscopic procedure.

RESULTS

In all, 2420 patients underwent wrist arthroscopy. Thirty (1.24%) were diagnosed with an ipsilateral wrist ganglion at a mean time of 4.0 months (standard deviation: 2.4, range: 0.2-9.0). Significant predictors of ganglion diagnosis included female gender (odds ratio [OR]: 4.0, P < .01) and triangular fibrocartilage complex and/or joint debridement (OR: 0.13, P < .01). By comparison, among all 24,718,751 outpatients who had not undergone wrist arthroscopy, 39,832 patients had a diagnosis of a wrist ganglion cyst (0.16%).

CONCLUSIONS

Wrist arthroscopy is associated with a postoperative rate of ganglion cyst formation that is nearly 8 times the rate in the general population. Additional studies are needed to investigate techniques that minimize the risk of this complication.

Facet Inclinations and Interfacet Angle of the Distal Radius on Posteroanterior Radiographs: Clinical Associations With 3 Carpal Pathologies

PURPOSE

The radiographic interfacet angle (IFA), scaphoid facet inclination (SFI), and lunate facet inclination (LFI) of the distal radius were measured in patients with 3 distinct wrist pathologies to determine whether there is an association between these radiographic measurements and these conditions.

METHODS

Posteroanterior wrist radiographs were compiled from patients with 3 types of common wrist pathologies (scaphoid waist fracture [n = 54], scapholunate [SL] dissociation [n = 23], and dorsal ganglion [n = 51]). The patients were all Caucasians aged 20 to 45 years who met strict radiographic criteria. The IFA, SFI, and LFI values of these patients were compared with those obtained from 400 normal wrist radiographs of subjects who met the same selection criteria.

RESULTS

In men with a scaphoid waist fracture, the IFA and SFI were significantly greater than in normal men, whereas the LFI was significantly lower. In the SL dissociation group, for all patients and for subgroups stratified according to sex, the IFA and SFI were significantly lower than in the normal matched groups. In the dorsal ganglion group, differences were found in the IFA and SFI for women, but not for men.

CONCLUSIONS

The facet orientations of the distal radius in patients with scaphoid fracture, SL dissociation, and dorsal ganglion differed from those in the normal population. The IFA alone is most likely to be associated with all 3 pathologies. The SFI and LFI are less likely to be associated with patients with carpal pathologies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Patients with a greater IFA may be susceptible to scaphoid fractures when they fall on an overstretched hand. Patients with a smaller IFA may be susceptible to SL dissociation when they fall on an overstretched hand.

Hand Masses

Hand and wrist soft tissue masses may be classified as pseudotumors, benign neoplasms, or malignant neoplasms. The vast majority of hand lesions are benign. Consideration of the location of the lesion and its imaging characteristics often leads to a specific diagnosis. Pseudotumors discussed in this article are ganglion cysts, accessory muscles, and inflammatory lesions. True tumors are described according to their tissue type: nerve sheath tumors, adipocytic tumors, so-called fibrohistiocytic tumors, pericytic tumors, and vascular lesions. We also outline the imaging features of masses encountered in the hand and wrist.

Pain Catastrophizing Scale as a predictor of low postoperative satisfaction after hand surgery

Background

Psychological measures are used increasingly in outcome studies. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale is a 13-item questionnaire used to measure coping skills and negative feelings of pain. In the existing literature it is suggested that the Pain Catastrophizing Scale could be associated with the outcome following surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of catastrophic thinking on postoperative satisfaction after treatment for hand conditions where pain is not the predominant symptom (Dupuytren's disease, trigger finger and wrist ganglia), and further to estimate cut-points on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale.

Methods

A total of 413 patients (53% females) with a mean age of 59 years were included in this one-year prospective follow-up study. The patients were diagnosed with either Dupuytren's disease (N = 133), trigger finger (N = 365), or wrist ganglia (N = 147). Preoperative data included disability (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH)), quality of life (EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D)), and pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)). One year postoperative, data on DASH score, EQ-5D, and patient satisfaction were collected. We used a classification tree to define the most important cut-points, which could classify patients as low-risk or high-risk of low postoperative satisfaction. These cut-points and the 75th percentile cut-point was then used in logistic regression models with postoperative satisfaction as outcome variable.

Results

The median DASH score improved from 13.5 to 2.6 (p < 0.01), and the median EQ-5D score improved from 0.82 to 1.00, and 90.3% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the surgery.Using the 75th percentile (≤12) we did not find a predictive effect of PCS. However, when using the two cut-points from the classification tree (≤27.5 & ≤2.9) all tested models were statistically significant with odds ratios for risk of low satisfaction ranging from 2.81 to 6.44. Only the model using PCS ≤27.5 adjusted for both demographics and disability was insignificant.

Conclusion

This study suggests that PCS can be a valuable tool in predicting postoperative satisfaction in hand conditions where pain is not the predominant symptom, and that ≤27.5 and ≤ 2.9 are the optimal cut-point on the preoperative PCS.

Incidence and Characteristics of Humeral Shaft Fractures After Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis

Background:

Biceps tenodesis is a procedure that can address biceps and labral pathology. While there is an increased risk of humeral fracture after biceps tenodesis, it has been described only in case reports.

Purpose:

To identify the incidence, demographics, and characteristics of humeral shaft fractures after biceps tenodesis.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

The US Military Health System Data Repository was searched for patients with a Current Procedural Terminology code for biceps tenodesis between January 2013 and December 2016. The cohort of identified patients was then searched for those assigned a code for humeral fracture per the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision and 10th Revision. The electronic health records and radiographs of patients who were diagnosed with a humeral fracture were then evaluated to confirm that the fracture was related to the biceps tenodesis. Records were then reviewed for patient demographics, radiographs, operative reports, and clinical notes.

Results:

A total of 15,085 biceps tenodeses were performed between January 2013 and December 2016. There were 11 postoperative and 1 intraoperative humeral fractures. The incidence of fracture was <0.1%. All fractures were extra-articular spiral fractures that propagated through the tenodesis site. Eight patients were treated with functional bracing, 3 with open reduction and internal fixation, and 1 with a soft tissue biceps tenodesis revision. Of 8 patients successfully treated nonoperatively, 6 regained full range of shoulder motion. Only 2 of the 4 patients who required operative treatment regained full range of shoulder motion.

Conclusion:

Humeral shaft fracture after biceps tenodesis is a rare complication that occurs in 7.9 out of 10,000 cases. Fractures occurred after various methods of fixation, including suture anchor, cortical button, and interference screw. Most patients were initially treated nonoperatively, and those who healed usually achieved full range of motion; however, those who required operative intervention often had restricted range of motion on final follow-up. Future studies should determine risk factors for fracture after biceps tenodesis.