Management of the Posttraumatic Coronoid-Deficient Elbow

Complex Elbow Fracture-Dislocations: An Algorithmic Approach to Treatment

Elbow stability arises from a combination of bony congruity, static ligamentous and capsular restraints, and dynamic muscular activation. Elbow trauma can disrupt these static and dynamic stabilizers leading to predictable patterns of instability; these patterns are dependent on the mechanism of injury and a progressive failure of anatomic structures. An algorithmic approach to the diagnosis and treatment of complex elbow fracture-dislocation injuries can improve the diagnostic assessment and reconstruction of the bony and ligamentous restraints to restore a stable and functional elbow. Achieving optimal outcomes requires a comprehensive understanding of pertinent local and regional anatomy, the altered mechanics associated with elbow injury, versatility in surgical approaches and fixation methods, and a strategic rehabilitation plan.

Coronoid fractures and complex elbow instability: current concepts

Fractures of the coronoid process typically occur as part of more complex injury patterns, such as terrible triads, trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations, posteromedial rotatory injuries or Monteggia-like lesions. Each pattern is associated with a specific type of coronoid fracture with regard to shape and size and specific soft-tissue lesions. O' Driscoll classification incorporates those associations identifying three major types of fractures: tip, anteromedial facet, and basal fractures. The objective of this study is to review the most common types of complex elbow instability, identify the indications for coronoid fixation and guide the appropriate management. Tip fractures as those seen in terrible triads can conditionally left untreated provided that elbow stability has been restored after radial head fixation and ligaments repair. Anteromedial facet fractures benefit from a buttress plate, while large basilar fractures can be effectively secured with posteroanterior screws. Coronoid reconstruction with a graft should be considered in post-traumatic cases of chronic coronoid deficiency.

Finite element analysis of a customized coronoid prosthesis for traumatic coronoid deficiency

BACKGROUND

Traumatic coronoid deficiency with persistent elbow instability is a challenging condition. Autologous bone graft reconstruction is often associated with a range of additional clinical problems and the outcome is often unpredictable. The purpose of this study was to design a prosthetic device that can reconstruct coronoid deficiency of any height and to evaluate its mechanical properties using finite element analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A customized coronoid prosthesis was designed based on image registration, automatic measurement, and computer-aided design. After pilot study and sample size calculation, image data collected from 6 patients who underwent bilateral complete upper extremity CT scans were reconstructed. The test was divided into 3 groups: coronoid intact, prosthesis and autograft. Regan-Morrey type II and autologous olecranon osteotomy models were established. The prosthesis and autogenous olecranon were assembled to the coronoid base. Stress was applied axially along the proximal humeral diaphysis and implant micromotion and contact mechanics of the humeroulnar joint were measured at 30°, 45°, 60° and 90° of joint flexion respectively.

RESULTS

At all flexion angles, the maximum stress on the coronoid articular surface was significantly reduced in the prosthesis and autograft groups, with the reduction being more significant in the latter (P < .001). With increasing flexion, the maximum stress at the coronoid articular surface increased significantly after autograft reconstruction (7.2 to 68 MPa, P < .001), whereas the humeroulnar joint obtained a similar contact mechanics pattern to that of the control group after prosthetic reconstruction. As the flexion angle increased, the relative micromotion of both the prosthesis and autograft increased significantly (0.5-1.6 vs. 0.2-1.2, Pmeasure time < 0.001, Pgroups < 0.001). Contact pressure and center-of-force paths of the humeroulnar joint experience abrupt stress changes at approximately 60° of flexion.

CONCLUSION

The contact stress pattern in the humeroulnar joint is similar in prosthesis and intact coronoid groups. Autograft reconstruction increases contact stresses at the articular surface and alters the joint center-of-force path. The "stress surge phenomenon" in the humeroulnar joint surface before and after 60° of flexion may be one of the mechanisms of traumatic elbow degeneration.

Postoperative Elbow Instability: Options for Revision Stabilization

Persistent and recurrent postoperative elbow instability includes a spectrum of pathologies ranging from joint incongruity and subluxation to dislocation. Restoration of osseous anatomy, particularly the coronoid, is a priority in restoring elbow alignment and maintaining ulnohumeral joint stability. After managing bony deficiencies, soft-tissue and ligamentous structures are typically addressed. When required, both static and dynamic adjunctive stabilization procedures have been described, which aid in maintaining a concentric reduction. In these complex procedures, both complication avoidance and early recognition of postoperative complications assist in obtaining a good result. In this review, we discuss current treatment options for revision stabilization for patients with persistent and recurrent elbow subluxation or dislocation after primary stabilization.

Trans-ulnar fracture dislocations of the elbow: a systematic review and clarification of classification systems

BACKGROUND

Complex elbow dislocations in which the dorsal cortex of the ulna is fractured can be difficult to classify and therefore treat. These have variably been described as either Monteggia variant injuries or trans-olecranon fracture dislocations. Additionally, O'Driscoll et al classified coronoid fractures that exit the dorsal cortex of the ulna as "basal coronoid, subtype 2" fractures. The Mayo classification of trans-ulnar fracture dislocations categorizes these injuries in 3 types according to what the coronoid remains attached to: trans-olecranon fracture dislocations, Monteggia variant fracture dislocations, and trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of these injury patterns as reported in the literature. Our hypothesis was that trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations would have a worse prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to identify studies with trans-ulnar fracture dislocations that had documentation of associated coronoid injuries. A literature search identified 16 qualifying studies with 296 fractures. Elbows presenting with basal subtype 2 or Regan/Morrey III coronoid fractures and Jupiter IIA and IID injuries were classified as trans-ulnar basal coronoid fractures. Patients with trans-olecranon or Monteggia fractures were classified as such if the coronoid was not fractured or an associated coronoid fracture had been classified as O'Driscoll tip, anteromedial facet, basal subtype I, or Regan Morrey I/II.

RESULTS

The 296 fractures reviewed were classified as trans-olecranon in 44 elbows, Monteggia variant in 82 elbows, and trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations in 170 elbows. Higher rates of complications and reoperations were reported for trans-ulnar basal coronoid injuries (40%, 25%) compared to trans-olecranon (11%, 18%) and Monteggia variant injuries (25%, 13%). The mean flexion-extension arc for basal coronoid fractures was 106° compared to 117° for Monteggia (P < .01) and 121° for trans-olecranon injuries (P = .02). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 84 points for trans-ulnar basal coronoid, 91 for Monteggia (P < .01), and 93 for trans-olecranon fracture dislocations (P < .05). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 22 and 80 for trans-ulnar basal coronoid, respectively, compared to 23 and 89 for trans-olecranon fractures. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons was not available for any Monteggia injuries, but the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand was 13.

DISCUSSION

Trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations are associated with inferior patient reported outcome measures, decreased range of motion, and increased complication rates compared to trans-olecranon or Monteggia variant fracture dislocations. Further research is needed to determine the most appropriate treatment for this difficult injury pattern.

A coronoid-centric classification system of proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations has almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver agreement

BACKGROUND

Fracture-dislocations of the elbow, particularly those that involve a fracture through the proximal ulna, are complex and can be difficult to manage. Moreover, current classification systems often cannot discriminate between Monteggia-variant injury patterns and trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations, particularly when the fracture involves the coronoid. The Mayo classification of proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations categorizes these fractures into 3 types according to what the coronoid is still attached to: trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is still attached to the ulnar metaphysis); Monteggia-variant fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is still attached to the olecranon); and ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is not attached to either the olecranon or the ulnar metaphysis). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver agreement of the Mayo classification system when assessing elbow fracture-dislocations involving the proximal ulna based on radiographs and computed tomography scans.

METHODS

Three fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeons and 2 fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons blindly and independently evaluated the radiographs and computed tomography scans of 90 consecutive proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations treated at a level I trauma center. The inclusion criteria included subluxation or dislocation of the elbow and/or radioulnar joint with a complete fracture through the proximal ulna. Each surgeon classified all fractures according to the Mayo classification, which is based on what the coronoid remains attached to (ulnar metaphysis, olecranon, or neither). Intraobserver reliability was determined by scrambling the order of the fractures and having each observer classify all the fractures again after a washout period ≥ 6 weeks. Interobserver reliability was obtained to assess the overall agreement between observers. κ Values were calculated for both intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability.

RESULTS

The average intraobserver agreement was 0.87 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.76-0.91). Interobserver agreement was 0.80 (substantial agreement; range, 0.70-0.90) for the first reading session and 0.89 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.85-0.93) for the second reading session. The overall average interobserver agreement was 0.85 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.79-0.91).

CONCLUSION

Classifying proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations based on what the coronoid remains attached to (olecranon, ulnar metaphysis, or neither) was associated with almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver agreement, regardless of trauma vs. shoulder and elbow fellowship training. Further research is needed to determine whether the use of this classification system leads to the application of principles specific to the management of these injuries and translates into better outcomes.

Acute and chronic coronoid reconstruction using the olecranon Tip

Post-traumatic coronoid deficiency in the elbow can lead to chronic pain, instability and arthritis. A variety of osteochondral grafts have been used to reconstruct the coronoid, and restore elbow stability. The radial head and iliac crest grafts are the most common in the literature but have limitations. The olecranon tip is a promising alternative, with both cadaveric and computer models demonstrating superior congruency, without compromising elbow stability or disrupting the extensor mechanism. We present a small, case series demonstrating the technique for contralateral and ipsilateral grafts in both the acute and chronic setting.

Coronoid Fracture Reconstruction with Ipsilateral Olecranon Osteoarticular Autograft in the Acute Setting: A Case Report

CASE

An 18-year-old male polytrauma patient sustained a high-energy posterior fracture dislocation of his left elbow associated with a comminuted and irreparable O'Driscoll type 2 subtype 3 anteromedial facet coronoid fracture. He underwent early coronoid reconstruction using ipsilateral olecranon osteoarticular autograft with incorporation of the sublime tubercle attachment of the medial collateral ligament and repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament. A 3-year follow-up revealed a functional, painless, congruent, and stable elbow.

CONCLUSION

Early reconstruction of a highly comminuted coronoid fracture may be a useful salvage option for the polytrauma patient, thereby avoiding complications associated with late reconstruction of posttraumatic elbow instability.

Reconstruction of the coronoid process with the olecranon tip for chronic elbow dislocation in children: A rare case report and literature review

The coronoid process of the ulna, as a key part of the elbow joint, plays an important role in maintaining elbow joint stability. Reconstruction of the coronoid process is necessary in both acute and chronic coronoid defects to restore elbow stability and avoid early joint degeneration. The olecranon tip may be a useful autologous osteochondral graft for reconstructing the same shape of the ulna coronoid process. The purpose of this report was to verify if reconstruction of the coronoid process with the olecranon tip can restore elbow stability and kinematics. Here, we report a 13-year-old boy who had undergone Kirschner-wire fixation for a left supracondylar fracture of the left humerus 9 years previously. After that, the right elbow dislocation and varus deformity gradually appeared. Imaging revealed posterolateral dislocation of the left elbow due to the absence of the coronoid process of the ulna. We reconstructed the ulnar coronoid process by intercepting the ipsilateral olecranon tip. After 22 months of follow-up, the range of motion of the left elbow joint was normal, and the cubitus varus deformity disappeared. The results of this report suggest that olecranon tip autografts are suitable to replace transverse coronoid defects. Given the patient's satisfactory clinical results, this reconstruction technique is safe and effective for the treatment of chronic elbow instability due to coronoid process defects of the ulna.

Computed tomography analysis of the relationship between the coronoid and the radial head

BACKGROUND

The coronoid process is an important stabilizer of the elbow, and its anatomy has been extensively studied. However, data documenting the relationship of the coronoid relative to the radial head (RH) are limited. The latter is a good landmark for the surgeon when débriding or reconstructing the coronoid. This imaging-based study quantified the anatomic relationship between the coronoid and the proximal radius and ulna.

METHODS

We investigated 80 cadaveric upper extremities (18 paired elbows) by 3-dimensional digital analysis of computed tomography data. After construction of a standardized coordinate system, the relationships between the coronoid, the anterior-most point of the RH, the deepest point of the articular surface of the RH, the top of the lesser sigmoid notch, and the deepest point of the guiding ridge of the trochlear notch were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean height of the tip of the coronoid was 36 ± 4 mm (range, 26-43 mm). The mean height of the anterior-most point of the RH was 40 ± 4 mm (range, 28-47 mm). The mean distance between the tip of the coronoid and the anterior-most point of the RH was 4.5 ± 1 mm (range, 2-10 mm). For paired elbows, the heights of the tip of the coronoid and the anterior-most point of the RH were similar between sides.

CONCLUSION

This study described the relationship between the coronoid and RH. This information should prove useful when reconstructing a coronoid from a medial approach in the case of an intact RH. The difference in radiographic height between the tip of the coronoid and anterior RH in the normal elbow averages 5 mm. However, when we account for the normal cartilage thickness of the RH and coronoid, a 3- to 6-mm difference in height would be seen at surgery depending on whether the cartilage of the coronoid process is intact or removed. The distance between the tip of the coronoid and the anterior-most point of the RH is similar to the size of shavers used when débriding osteophytes during arthroscopy.

Coronoid process reconstruction with a distal clavicle autograft: an in silico analysis of fitting accuracy

BACKGROUND

The coronoid process plays a vital role in preserving elbow stability. In cases of acute or chronic deficiency of the coronoid process, reconstruction is warranted to restore stability and to avoid early joint degeneration. The distal clavicle might be a useful osteochondral autograft for coronoid reconstruction with low donor-site morbidity. This study evaluated the fitting accuracy of the distal clavicle as an autograft for coronoid process reconstruction.

METHODS

One hundred upper-extremity computed tomography scans of 85 body donors were available for this study (mean age, 69 ± 17 years; 46 male and 39 female donors; 15 bilateral specimens). Standardized 40% transverse defects of the coronoid process were digitally created; the distal clavicles were digitally harvested and placed onto the defects by a best-fit technique in 2 different orientations using commercially available software: (1) with the superior aspect of the articular surface of the graft oriented toward the coronoid tip and (2) with the inferior aspect of the articular surface of the graft oriented toward the coronoid tip. The fitting accuracy of the grafts to the native coronoid process was evaluated from lateral to medial using custom code.

RESULTS

Regardless of the orientation of the graft, the distal clavicle provided a good fit in the central portion of the coronoid process. In the lateral and medial aspects of the defect, however, the fitting accuracy of the graft declined significantly (P ≤ .044). No significant differences were observed between ipsilateral and contralateral grafts (P ≥ .199). The intrarater reliability was excellent.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that a distal clavicle autograft may be suitable to replace a transverse defect of the coronoid process; however, it may not fully reconstruct the anteromedial and anterolateral aspects of the coronoid.

Reconstruction of coronoid process of the ulna: a literature review

As a pivotal part of the elbow joint structure, the coronoid process of the ulna plays a vital role in maintaining elbow joint stability. Loss of coronoid process height causes instability of the elbow joint depending on the fracture characteristics and size. The diagnosis and treatment of coronoid process fractures has gained widespread attention from orthopedic surgeons. Nevertheless, few reports have described reconstruction of coronoid process fractures and defects that affect elbow joint stability. Treatment of elbow joint instability induced by coronoid process defects is challenging because most cases are complicated by other elbow joint injuries. Moreover, the clinical efficacy remains unclear. The present narrative review was performed to examine the research progress on reconstruction of the coronoid process. The findings of this review provide evidence for clinical repair and reconstruction of coronoid process defects and contribute to the published literature on this topic.

Chronic complex persistent elbow instability: a consecutive and prospective case series and review of recent literature

BACKGROUND

Chronic complex persistent elbow instability (CCPEI) is a condition that even expert elbow surgeons find challenging to treat. The results of the few studies that have dealt with the treatment of this condition are conflicting. We describe the surgical results of a consecutive prospective series of patients with CCPEI and provide a review of the recent literature.

METHODS

We assessed 21 patients with previous failed surgical or conservative treatment, with a terrible-triad injury in 13, Monteggia-like lesion in 6, humeral shear fracture-dislocation in 1, and radial head fracture-dislocation in 1. Overall, 21 open débridement procedures, 15 ulnar nerve transpositions, 6 ulnar in situ neurolysis procedures, 7 total elbow arthroplasties, 8 radial head arthroplasties, 1 radial head resection with humeroradial anconeus interpositional arthroplasty, 4 coronoid graft reconstructions, 14 ligament retensioning procedures, 3 ulnar nonunion treatments, and 2 ulnar osteotomies were performed. Two dynamic external fixators were applied. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score, quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score were used preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 29.4 months. A significant improvement was found between preoperative and postoperative clinical scores and range-of-motion values. The reintervention and major complication rates were 19% and 23%, respectively. Arthritic evolution was observed in 71% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

CCPEI is a challenging condition with an uncertain prognosis. The variability in patients' pathoanatomic conditions requires customized surgical treatment aimed at elbow stabilizer reconstruction when the ulnohumeral joint is preserved or aimed at joint replacement in case of severe articular degeneration. The time interval between the initial trauma and index surgical procedure significantly affects the feasibility of reconstructive procedures.