1
|
Zhang Q, Xiang M, Yang J, Dai F. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Total Elbow Arthroplasty Using a Semi-constrained Prosthesis with a Triceps-preserving Approach over a Minimum Follow-up Period of 4 Years. Orthop Surg 2023; 15:2091-2101. [PMID: 37076437 PMCID: PMC10432419 DOI: 10.1111/os.13698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Complications related to triceps after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) have become a major surgical concern. The triceps-preserving approach has the advantage of not disturbing the insertion of triceps but is disadvantaged by the reduced exposure of the elbow joint. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of TEA with a triceps-preserving approach and to compare the outcomes of TEA to treat arthropathy with that of TEA to treat acute distal humerus fracture. METHODS From January 2010 to December 2018, 23 patients undergoing primary TEAs were retrospectively reviewed with a mean follow-up time of 92.6 months (range, 52-136 months). Each TEA was performed using the triceps-preserving approach with a semi-constrained Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis. Patient demographics, range of motion (ROM), pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and triceps strength (Medical Research Council [MRC] scale) were compared before and after surgery. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, radiographic outcome, and complications were evaluated at follow-up. RESULTS In total, seven males and 16 females were included in this study, with a mean age of 66.1 years (range:46-85 years). By the last follow-up, pain had been significantly relieved in all patients. The average MEPS in the arthropathy group and fracture group were 90.8 ± 10.3 points (range: 68-98 points) and 91.7 ± 0.4 (range: 76-100 points), respectively. The average DASH of the arthropathy group and fracture group was 37.3 ± 18.8 points (range: 18-52 points) and 38.4 ± 20.1 (range: 16-60 points). At the last follow-up after surgery, the mean flexion arcs in the arthropathy group and fracture group were 100.4° ± 24.1° and 97.8° ± 28.1°, respectively. The mean pro-supination arcs in the arthropathy group and fracture group were 142.4° ± 15.2° and 139.2° ± 17.5°, respectively. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups (P ≥ 0.05). Triceps strength was normal (MRC grade V) in 15 elbows and good in eight elbows. None of the cases experienced weakness of the triceps strength, infection, periprosthetic fractures, or prosthesis breakage. CONCLUSIONS The clinical and radiographical outcomes of TEA with the triceps-preserving approach were satisfactory in patients with distal humerus fracture, osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Zhang
- Department of Upper LimbSichuan Provincial Orthpaedics HospitalChengduChina
| | - Ming Xiang
- Department of Upper LimbSichuan Provincial Orthpaedics HospitalChengduChina
| | - Jin‐song Yang
- Department of Upper LimbSichuan Provincial Orthpaedics HospitalChengduChina
| | - Fei Dai
- Department of Upper LimbSichuan Provincial Orthpaedics HospitalChengduChina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kahan JB, Schneble CA, Simcock X, Evans PJ, Maschke SD, Seitz W, Donohue KW. The Van Gorder approach for total elbow arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:495-500. [PMID: 34653613 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical management of the triceps during exposure for total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is critical to a successful outcome. Previously described techniques include elevating the triceps insertion from one side or leaving the triceps insertion attached and dislocating the joint. Another approach to the elbow, first described in 1933 by Willis Campbell, MD, and subsequently modified by George Van Gorder, MD, involves turning down the triceps tendon without disrupting the triceps insertion. This approach offers complete visualization of the joint and provides excellent exposure for TEA. Only the original report of the technique and a small series of patients using this technique for TEA exist in the literature. The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of the Van Gorder approach in a large series of patients undergoing TEA. METHODS All patients who underwent TEA from 2008 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients who underwent primary TEA performed through the Van Gorder approach with at least 6 months' follow-up were included for analysis. Patients with prior elbow surgery were excluded. Demographic data, indication for surgery, postoperative range of motion, triceps function, and need for additional surgery were recorded. Prospectively collected visual analog scale (VAS) and Global Health Quality of Life scores were also analyzed. RESULTS A total of 53 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 62 years, 81% were female, and the average follow-up was 30.2 months. The most common surgical indications included inflammatory arthritis (47%), osteoarthritis (24%), and fracture (19%). Postoperatively, average elbow arc of motion was an 8°-137°. There was 1 patient (1.89%) who developed failure of their triceps extension mechanism. A total of 10 patients (19%) underwent additional elbow surgery most commonly for superficial wound complications. Preoperative VAS scores decreased significantly, starting at 3 months postoperatively (6.76 to 3.37, P < .001), and remained constant at the 12- and 24-month postoperative visits. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest study evaluating the Van Gorder surgical approach to the elbow for primary TEA with an average follow-up of 32 months. Overall rates of triceps failure and reoperation are consistent with other approaches for TEA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph B Kahan
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Christopher A Schneble
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Xavier Simcock
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Peter J Evans
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Martin Health, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Steven D Maschke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Martin Health, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - William Seitz
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Martin Health, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kenneth W Donohue
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Joo MS, Kim JW, Kim YT. Efficacy of 2-stage revision using a prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement spacer with or without cortical strut allograft in infected total elbow arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:2875-2885. [PMID: 34186170 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a self-manufactured prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement (PROSTALAC) spacer with or without cortical strut allograft in infected total elbow arthroplasty. METHODS Between March 2009 and February 2018, we enrolled 18 patients (mean age, 66.9 years) who underwent 2-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic infection following total elbow arthroplasty. After implant removal in the first stage, we performed débridement and PROSTALAC insertion. During the second stage, we performed reimplantation using a cortical strut allograft for patients with a considerably severe bone defect. The mean follow-up period was 34 months (range, 25-60 months), during which we evaluated the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion (ROM), and blood markers. RESULTS In all 18 patients, infection control was ensured using intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks or IV antibiotics for 4 weeks converting to oral antibiotics for 2 weeks following PROSTALAC insertion. The mean visual analog scale score improved from 8 points preoperatively to 2 points postoperatively, and the mean MEPS improved from 32 points preoperatively to 82 points postoperatively (P < .05). The average ROMs at the last follow-up were 9° to 132° from extension to flexion, respectively. Two patients experienced ulnar nerve neuropraxia after surgery, from which they were resolved. Moreover, 2 and 4 patients developed superficial wound infection and triceps insufficiency, respectively, and there was no infection recurrence. CONCLUSION In the management of elbow prosthetic infection, 2-stage revision arthroplasty using PROSTALAC spacer insertion in the first stage and cortical strut allograft in the second stage for patients with severe bone defect revealed good clinical results and relatively low infection recurrence rates. However, the complication rate is substantial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min-Su Joo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Woo Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
| | - Yeong-Tae Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Meijering D, Welsink CL, Boerboom AL, Bulstra SK, Vegter RJK, Stevens M, Eygendaal D, van den Bekerom MPJ. Triceps Insufficiency After Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. JBJS Rev 2021; 9:01874474-202107000-00008. [PMID: 34270508 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.20.00281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of triceps insufficiency after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) varies in the literature, and a consensus on treatment strategy is lacking. We review the incidence, the risk factors, the clinical presentation, and the diagnosis and treatment of triceps insufficiency after TEA. Based on this information, we have formulated recommendations for clinical practice. METHODS We performed a systematic review of the literature from January 2003 to April 2020 to identify studies that investigated triceps function following TEA by searching the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Eligible studies (1) reported on triceps function following primary or revision TEA for every indication, regardless of technique (e.g., bone grafts), (2) included ≥6 adult patients, (3) had the full-text article available, and (4) had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. RESULTS Eighty studies with a total of 4,825 TEAs were included. The quality was low in 15 studies, moderate in 64 studies, and high in 1 study. The mean incidence of triceps insufficiency was 4.5%. The rates were highest in patients after revision TEA (22%), in those with posttraumatic arthritis as an indication for surgery (10.2%), and after a triceps-reflecting approach (4.9%). Most studies used the Medical Research Council scale to score triceps function, although cutoff points and the definition of triceps insufficiency differed among studies. Surgical treatment showed favorable results with anconeus tendon transfer and Achilles allograft repair when compared with direct repair. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of triceps insufficiency varies greatly, probably due to a lack of consensus on the definition of the term. Therefore, we recommend the guidelines for clinical practice that are presented in this article. These guidelines assist clinicians in providing the best possible treatment strategy for their patients and help researchers optimize their future study designs in order to compare outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniëlle Meijering
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Chantal L Welsink
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander L Boerboom
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd K Bulstra
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Riemer J K Vegter
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Martin Stevens
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Denise Eygendaal
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Michel P J van den Bekerom
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meijering D, Boerboom AL, Gerritsma CLE, The B, van den Bekerom MPJ, van der Pluijm M, Vegter RJK, Bulstra SK, Eygendaal D, Stevens M. Prospective cohort study comparing a triceps-sparing and triceps-detaching approach in total elbow arthroplasty: a protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046098. [PMID: 33952551 PMCID: PMC8103376 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New surgical approaches have been developed to optimise elbow function after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Currently, there is no consensus on the best surgical approach. This study aims to investigate the functional outcomes, prosthetic component position and complication rates after a triceps-sparing and a triceps-detaching approach in TEA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A multicentre prospective comparative cohort study will be conducted. All patients with an indication for primary TEA will enrol in either the triceps-sparing or the triceps-detaching cohort. Primary outcome measure is elbow function, specified as fixed flexion deformity. Secondary outcome parameters are self-reported and objectively measured physical functioning, including triceps force, prosthetic component position in standard radiographs and complications. DISCUSSION The successful completion of this study will clarify which surgical approach yields better functional outcomes, better prosthetic component position and lower complication rates in patients with a TEA. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Medical Ethics Review Board of University Medical Center Groningen reviewed the study and concluded that it is not clinical research with human subjects as meant in the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO), therefore WMO approval is not needed (METc2019/544). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR NL8488.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Meijering
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander L Boerboom
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bertram The
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Michel P J van den Bekerom
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco van der Pluijm
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Riemer J K Vegter
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd K Bulstra
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Eygendaal
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Stevens
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kwak JM, Koh KH, Jeon IH. Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Revision Surgery. Clin Orthop Surg 2019; 11:369-379. [PMID: 31788158 PMCID: PMC6867907 DOI: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.4.369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Total elbow arthroplasty is a common surgical procedure used in the management of advanced rheumatoid arthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, osteoarthritis, and unfixable fracture in elderly patients. Total elbow prostheses have evolved over the years and now include the linked, unlinked, and convertible types. However, long-term complications, including infection, aseptic loosening, instability, and periprosthetic fracture, remain a challenge. Here, we introduce each type of implant and evaluate clinical outcomes and complications by reviewing the previous literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Man Kwak
- Department of Orthopedics, Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kyoung-Hwan Koh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In-Ho Jeon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|