Comparison Between Supercharged Ulnar Nerve Repair by Anterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer and Isolated Ulnar Nerve Repair in Proximal Ulnar Nerve Injuries

Supercharge end-to-side nerve transfer from anterior interosseous nerve to augment intrinsic recovery in high ulnar nerve injuries of varying magnitudes

BACKGROUND

High ulnar nerve injuries result in intrinsic muscle weakness and are inconvenient for patients. Moreover, conventional surgical techniques often fail to achieve satisfactory motor recovery. A potential reconstructive solution in the form of the supercharge end-to-side (SETS) anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) transfer method has emerged. Therefore, this study aims to compare surgical outcomes of patients with transected and in-continuity high ulnar nerve lesions following SETS AIN transfer.

METHODS

Between June 2015 and May 2023, patients with high ulnar palsy in the form of transection injuries or lesion-in-continuity were recruited. The assessment encompassed several objective results, including grip strength, key pinch strength, compound muscle action potential, sensory nerve action potential, and two-point discrimination tests. The muscle power of finger abduction and adduction was also recorded. Additionally, subjective questionnaires were utilized to collect data on patient-reported outcomes. Overall, the patients were followed up for up to 2 years.

RESULTS

Patients with transected high ulnar nerve lesions exhibited worse baseline performance than those with lesion-in-continuity, including motor and sensory functions. However, they experienced greater motor improvement but less sensory recovery, resulting in comparable final motor outcomes in both groups. In contrast, the transection group showed worse sensory outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that SETS AIN transfer benefits patients with high ulnar nerve palsy, regardless of the lesion type. Nonetheless, improvements may be more pronounced in patients with transected lesions.

Supercharging of the ulnar nerve: clinical and neurophysiological assessment at 2 years for nine proximal injuries

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Outcomes of radiocarpal pinning to facilitate nerve repair in wrist-level ulnar nerve injuries with defect

BACKGROUND

The ideal scenario for ulnar nerve repair is primary end-to-end neurorrhaphy in a tension-free environment. However, this could be complicated by soft tissue loss, scarring, and neuroma formation in a delayed injury, creating a nerve defect. With a wrist-level nerve defect, a flexion position can help shorten the nerve gap; however, maintaining the position can be challenging intraoperatively and postoperatively.

METHODS

Previously, we proposed our method of using a 1.6-mm K wire for radius-lunate-capitate pinning of the wrist in flexion to minimize the nerve gap, thereby facilitating neuroma excision and end-to-end neurorrhaphy in delayed ulnar nerve injury. In this study, we elaborate our method and present our case series.

RESULTS

From October 2018 to July 2020, five patients (mean age: 48.2 years; mean delay from injury to surgery: 84.6 days; mean follow-up: 17.5 months) were retrospectively reviewed. The mean flexion fixation angle was 52°, and the K wire was removed at an average of 5.1 weeks postoperatively. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. All patients achieved M4 and S3 or S3+ neurologically (according to the criteria of the Nerve Injuries Committee of the British Medical Research Council). The mean disabilities arm, shoulder, and hand score was 14.1. The mean grasp and pinch strengths were, respectively, 76.8% and 63.6% of the contralateral hand. All wrist range of motion returned to normal within 12 weeks. No complications were noted intraoperatively or postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that radiocarpal pinning of the wrist in flexion was safe and convenient to minimize the nerve gap and to facilitate end-to-end neurorrhaphy in limited-sized wrist-level ulnar nerve defects.

A Surgical Framework for the Management of Incomplete Axillary Nerve Injuries

BACKGROUND

 Axillary nerve injury is the most common nerve injury affecting shoulder function. Nerve repair, grafting, and/or end-to-end nerve transfers are used to reconstruct complete neurotmetic axillary nerve injuries. While many incomplete axillary nerve injuries self-resolve, axonotmetic injuries are unpredictable, and incomplete recovery occurs. Similarly, recovery may be further inhibited by superimposed compression neuropathy at the quadrangular space. The current framework for managing incomplete axillary injuries typically does not include surgery.

METHODS

 This study is a retrospective analysis of 23 consecutive patients with incomplete axillary nerve palsy who underwent quadrangular space decompression with additional selective medial triceps to axillary end-to-side nerve transfers in 7 patients between 2015 and 2019. Primary outcome variables included the proportion of patients with shoulder abduction M3 or greater as measured on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, and shoulder pain measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcome variables included pre- and postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) scores.

RESULTS

 A total of 23 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent nerve surgery a mean 10.7 months after injury. Nineteen (83%) patients achieved MRC grade 3 shoulder abduction or greater after intervention, compared with only 4 (17%) patients preoperatively (p = 0.001). There was a significant decrease in VAS shoulder pain scores of 4.2 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 1.9 ± 2.4 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The DASH scores also decreased significantly from 48.8 ± 19.0 preoperatively to 30.7 ± 20.4 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Total follow-up was 17.3 ± 4.3 months.

CONCLUSION

 A surgical framework is presented for the appropriate diagnosis and surgical management of incomplete axillary nerve injury. Quadrangular space decompression with or without selective medial triceps to axillary end-to-side nerve transfers is associated with improvement in shoulder abduction strength, pain, and DASH scores in patients with incomplete axillary nerve palsy.

Primary Repair versus Reverse End-to-Side Coaptation by Anterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer in Proximal Ulnar Nerve Injuries

BACKGROUND

Proximal ulnar nerve lacerations are challenging to treat because of the complex integration of sensory and motor function in the hand. The purpose of this study was to compare primary repair and primary repair plus anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) reverse end-to-side (RETS) coaptation in the setting of proximal ulnar nerve injuries.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed of all patients at a single, academic, level I trauma center from 2014 to 2018 presenting with isolated complete ulnar nerve lacerations. Patients underwent either primary repair (PR) only or primary repair and AIN RETS (PR + RETS). Data collected included demographic information; quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score; Medical Research Council score; grip and pinch strength; and visual analogue scale pain scores at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included in the study: 28 in the PR group and 32 in the RETS + PR group. There was no difference in demographic variables or location of injury between the two groups. Average quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire scores for the PR and PR + RETS groups were 65 ± 6 and 36 ± 4 at 6 months and 46 ± 4 and 24 ± 3 at 12 months postoperatively, respectively, and were significantly lower in the PR + RETS group at both points. Average grip and pinch strength were significantly greater for the PR + RETS group at 6 and 12 months.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that primary repair of proximal ulnar nerve injuries plus AIN RETS coaptation yielded superior strength and improved upper extremity function when compared with PR alone.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Reverse End-to-Side Transfer to Ulnar Motor Nerve: Evidence From Preclinical and Clinical Studies

The disappointing outcomes of conventional nerve repair or grafting procedures for proximal ulnar nerve injuries have led the scientific community to search for better alternatives. The pronator quadratus branch of the anterior interosseous nerve has been transferred to the distal ulnar motor branch in a reverse end-to-side fashion with encouraging results. This transfer is now becoming commonly used as an adjunct to cubital tunnel decompression in patients with compressive ulnar neuropathy, underscoring the need for this knowledge transfer to the neurosurgical community. However, the mechanism of recovery after these transfers is not understood completely. We have reviewed the existing preclinical and clinical literature relevant to this transfer to summarize the current level of understanding of the underlying mechanisms, define the indications for performing this transfer in the clinic, and identify the complications and best practices with respect to the operative technique. We have also attempted to identify the major deficiencies in our current level of understanding of the recovery process to propose directions for future research.

Reverse End-to-Side Nerve Transfer for Severe Ulnar Nerve Injury: A Western Canadian Multicentre Prospective Nonrandomized Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Reverse end-to-side (RETS) nerve transfer has become increasingly popular in patients with severe high ulnar nerve injury, but the reported outcomes have been inconsistent.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the "babysitting effect," we compared outcomes after anterior interosseous nerve RETS transfer with nerve decompression alone. To evaluate the source of regenerating axons, a group with end-to-end (ETE) transfer was used for comparisons.

METHODS

Electrophysiology measures were used to quantify the regeneration of anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) and ulnar nerve fibers while functional recovery was evaluated using key pinch and Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. The subjects were followed postsurgically for 3 years.

RESULTS

Sixty-two subjects (RETS = 25, ETE = 16, and decompression = 21) from 4 centers in Western Canada were enrolled. All subjects with severe ulnar nerve injury had nerve compression at the elbow except 10 in the ETE group had nerve laceration or traction injury. Postsurgically, no reinnervation from the AIN to the abductor digiti minimi muscles was seen in any of the RETS subjects. Although there was no significant improvement in compound muscle action potentials amplitudes and pressure detection thresholds in the decompression and RETS group, key pinch strength significantly improved in the RETS group ( P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The results from published clinical trials are conflicting in part because crossover regeneration from the donor nerve has never been measured. Unlike those with ETE nerve transfers, we found that there was no crossover regeneration in the RETS group. The extent of reinnervation was also no different from decompression surgery alone. Based on these findings, the justifications for this surgical technique need to be carefully re-evaluated.

Reverse End-to-Side (Supercharging) Nerve Transfer: Conceptualization, Validation, and Translation

Partial nerve recovery either after expectant observation following an injury in-continuity or after nerve repair is not an uncommon occurrence. Historically, treatment strategies in these situations-late repair, revision repair, or acceptance of a mediocre result-were unsatisfying. The reverse end-to-side, or supercharging, nerve transfer was conceived to offer a more palatable option. Partially validated primarily through small animal research, supercharging has been rapidly translated to clinical practice. Many have extended the indications beyond the original intent, though the final place of this technique in the peripheral nerve surgeon's armamentarium is still yet to be determined.

Contemporary Approaches to Peripheral Nerve Surgery

“State of the Art” Learning Objectives: This manuscript serves to provide the reader with a general overview of the contemporary approaches to peripheral nerve reconstruction as the field has undergone considerable advancement over the last 3 decades. The learning objectives are as follows: To provide the reader with a brief history of peripheral nerve surgery and some of the landmark developments that allow for current peripheral nerve care practices. To outline the considerations and management options for the care of patients with brachial plexopathy, spinal cord injury, and lower extremity peripheral nerve injury. Highlight contemporary surgical techniques to address terminal neuroma and phantom limb pain. Review progressive and future procedures in peripheral nerve care, such as supercharge end-to-side nerve transfers. Discuss rehabilitation techniques for peripheral nerve care.

Classifying the Severity of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Preoperative Grading System Incorporating Electrodiagnostic Parameters

BACKGROUND

Current classifications for cubital tunnel syndrome have not been shown to reliably predict postoperative outcomes. In this article, the authors introduce a new classification that incorporates clinical and electrodiagnostic parameters, including compound muscle action potential amplitude, to classify the preoperative severity of cubital tunnel syndrome. The authors compare this to established classifications and evaluate its association with patient-rated improvement.

METHODS

The authors reviewed 44 patients who were treated surgically for cubital tunnel syndrome. Patients were retrospectively classified using their proposed classification and the Akahori, McGowan-Goldberg, Dellon, and Gu classifications. Correlation of grades was assessed by Spearman coefficients and agreement was assessed by weighted kappa coefficients. Patient-reported impairment was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire before and after surgery.

RESULTS

The classifications tended to grade patients in a similar way, with Spearman coefficients of 0.60 to 0.85 ( p < 0.0001) and weighted kappa coefficients of 0.46 to 0.71 ( p < 0.0001). Preoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores increased with severity grade for most classifications. In multivariable analysis, the authors' classification predicted postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improvement, whereas established classifications did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Established classifications are imperfect indicators of preoperative severity. The authors introduce a preoperative classification for cubital tunnel syndrome that incorporates electrodiagnostic findings in addition to classic signs and symptoms.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, III.

Anterior Interosseous Nerve to Ulnar Nerve Transfer: A systematic review

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Outcomes of anterior interosseous nerve transfer to restore intrinsic muscle function after high ulnar nerve injury

Traumatic high ulnar nerve injuries have historically resulted in long-term loss of hand function due to the long re-innervation distance to the intrinsic muscles. Transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve (MUN) is proving promising in these patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and efficacy of this procedure in our series. Eligible high ulnar nerve injury patients who underwent AIN to MUN nerve transfer were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 17 months. Data including demographics, injury details, surgical procedures, and outcomes were collected. A review of the current literature was performed for comparison. Sixteen patients had AIN to MUN transfer, mean age of 39.4 years, and a median delay from injury to nerve transfer of 0.8 months. The injury site was above the elbow in 5 cases, at the elbow in 8 cases, and in the proximal forearm in 3 cases. The majority were sharp transection, with the remaining from blast injuries, traumatic traction, and one post-traumatic neuroma resection. Transfer was performed end-to-end in 7 cases, hemi end-to-end in 7 cases, and supercharged end-to-side in 2 cases. Five patients achieved intrinsic muscle recovery of MRC 4+ and thirteen gained MRC 3 or above. The AIN to MUN nerve transfer provides meaningful intrinsic recovery in the majority of traumatic high ulnar nerve injuries. This procedure should be routinely considered, however, warrants further research to validate the optimum technique.

End-to-side neurorrhaphy in peripheral nerves: Does it work?

Acute peripheral nerve injuries are common and can cause physical disabilities with sensory and functional sequelae; they therefore require surgery. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review to assess the clinical applicability of end-to-side neurorrhaphy in peripheral nerve reconstruction, based on available evidence. We carried out a systematic review of the literature using MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scielo and Scopus through March 16, 2021. Most of the selected studies were qualitative and employed nonrandomized groups of patients, without standardized scales for assessing outcomes, which made statistical analysis difficult. Efficacy varied from 24% to 81%. Factors for better outcome included the type of injury, type of injured nerve (sensory, motor or mixed), presence of an epineural window, topography, injury extension <1.3 cm, and intervention within 2 weeks of injury. Clinical studies so far lack scientific evidence on end-to-side neurorrhaphy in peripheral nerve lesions.

Neuroplasticity following Nerve Transfer of the Anterior Interosseous Nerve for Proximal Ulnar Nerve Injuries

Background:

Injuries to the ulnar nerve at or above proximal forearm level result in poor recovery despite early microsurgical repair, especially concerning the intrinsic motor function of the hand. To augment the numbers of regenerating axons into the targeted muscles, a nerve transfer of the distal branch of the median nerve, the anterior interosseous nerve, to the ulnar motor branch has been described.

Methods:

Two patients with severe atrophy of the intrinsic hand muscles following an initial proximal ulnar nerve repair had surgery with an end-to-side transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve to the ulnar motor branch at the wrist level. Outcome and neuroplasticity were prospectively studied using questionnaires, clinical examinations, electroneurography, electromyography, somatosensory evoked potentials at pre nerve transfer and 3-, 12-, and 24-months post nerve transfer as well as navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation at pre nerve transfer and 3- and 12-months post nerve transfer.

Results:

Successively improved motor function was observed. Complete reinnervation of intrinsic hand muscles was demonstrated at 12- to 24-months follow-up by electroneurography and electromyography. At the cortical level, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation detected a movement of the hot-spot for the abductor digiti mini muscle, originally innervated by the ulnar nerve and the size of the area from where responses could be elicited in this muscle changed over time, indicating central plastic processes. An almost complete reinnervation of the pronator quadratus muscle was also observed.

Conclusion:

Both central and peripheral plastic mechanisms are involved in muscle reinnervation after anterior interosseous nerve transfer for treatment of proximal ulnar nerve injuries.

Effectiveness of Distal Nerve Transfers for Claw Correction With Proximal Ulnar Nerve Lesions

PURPOSE

To evaluate claw deformity correction following anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) end-to-end transfer to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve (DMBUN) in high ulnar nerve injuries.

METHODS

Eleven patients were retrospectively evaluated for metacarpophalangeal joint hyperextension and proximal interphalangeal joint extension lag in the fourth and fifth digits following ulnar nerve injury adjacent or proximal to the elbow, who underwent AIN end-to-end transfer to the DMBUN.

RESULTS

Patients underwent surgery an average of 5 months following injury (range, 2-9 months) and were followed for an average of 19 months after surgery (range, 12-30 months). At the last follow-up, clawing was observed in all patients, with proximal interphalangeal joint extension lag averaging 46.8° (SD, ±20°) in the fourth digit and 57.7° (SD, ±12°) in the little finger.

CONCLUSIONS

None of our patients experienced claw correction after AIN end-to-end transfer to the DMBUN.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Five Reliable Nerve Transfers for the Treatment of Isolated Upper Extremity Nerve Injuries

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article and accompanying videos, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand and apply the principles of nerve transfer surgery for nerve injuries. 2. Discuss important considerations when performing nerve transfers, such as aspects of surgical technique and perioperative decision-making. 3. Understand indications for end-to-end versus supercharged reverse end-to-side nerve transfers. 4. Understand an algorithm for treating nerve injuries to include the indications and surgical techniques of five nerve transfers commonly performed for the treatment of isolated upper extremity nerve injuries. 5. Understand the outcomes and postoperative management of the discussed nerve transfers.

SUMMARY

Nerve transfers are gaining wide acceptance because of their superior results in the management of many nerve injuries of the upper extremity. This article presents five nerve transfers for the treatment of isolated nerve injuries in the authors' upper extremity nerve practice that offer reliable results. Indications, surgical techniques, outcomes, and postoperative management are reviewed. To maximize functional outcomes in patients with nerve injuries, the treatment should be individualized to the patient, and the principles for nerve transfers as described herein should be considered.

Femoral nerve decompression and sartorius-to-quadriceps nerve transfers for partial femoral nerve injury: a cadaveric study and early case series

OBJECTIVE

Partial femoral nerve injuries cause significant disability with ambulation. Due to their more proximal and superficial location, sartorius branches are often spared in femoral nerve injuries. In this article, the authors report the benefits of femoral nerve decompression, demonstrate the feasibility of sartorius-to-quadriceps nerve transfers in a cadaveric study, describe the surgical technique, and report clinical results.

METHODS

Four fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs were dissected for anatomical analysis of the sartorius nerve. In addition, a retrospective review of patients with partial femoral nerve injuries treated with femoral nerve decompression and sartorius-to-quadriceps nerve transfers was conducted. Pre- and postoperative knee extension Medical Research Council (MRC) grades and pain scores (visual analog scale) were collected.

RESULTS

Up to 6 superficial femoral branches innervate the sartorius muscle just distal to the inguinal ligament. Each branch yielded an average of 672 nerve fibers (range 99-1850). Six patients underwent femoral nerve decompression and sartorius-to-quadriceps nerve transfers. Four patients also had concomitant obturator-to-quadriceps nerve transfers. At final follow-up (average 13.4 months), all patients achieved MRC grade 4-/5 or greater knee extension. The average preoperative pain score was 5.2, which decreased to 2.2 postoperatively (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral nerve decompression and nerve transfer using sartorius branches are a viable tool for restoring function in partial femoral nerve injuries. Sartorius branches serve as ideal donors in quadriceps nerve transfers because they are expendable, are close to their recipients, and have an adequate supply of nerve fibers.