Outcome of open trigger digit release

Not Just Another Trigger Finger

BACKGROUND

Open A1 pulley release for trigger finger has generally been considered a minor procedure with infrequent complications. Most reported complications are minor, including scar pain and tenderness, mild extension lag, and recurrence of triggering. Rates of major complications, such as bowstringing, neurovascular bundle injury, and infection requiring reoperation, are less than 1% to 4%. We aimed to describe the potentially devastating sequelae of these major complications and the subsequent consequences.

METHODS

Three patients underwent open trigger finger release, which were all complicated by severe postoperative surgical site infection requiring multiple subsequent procedures. We review our initial management, subsequent reconstructive options, and outcomes with up to 19 years follow-up.

RESULTS

All 3 adult patients who underwent open A1 pulley release for trigger finger developed a surgical site infection, leading to flexor tenosynovitis requiring urgent operative debridement and multiple subsequent procedures. Two patients were poorly controlled diabetics, and the third patient was otherwise healthy. Each patient ultimately developed distinct consequences from their postoperative course-finger stiffness and contracture, disabling bowstringing requiring the use of a pulley ring, and flexor tendon rupture requiring staged tendon reconstruction, respectively. All 3 patients at final follow-up had a permanent functional deficit.

CONCLUSIONS

Major complications after trigger finger release are infrequent. However, if left untreated, particularly in diabetic patients, there can be disastrous consequences, resulting in permanent loss of function. This case series highlights the importance of accurate diagnosis of postoperative infections and expedient treatment thereafter.

Single-Portal Antegrade Endoscopic Trigger Finger Release: Cadaveric and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine the relationship between anatomical surface landmarks in fresh frozen cadavers as related to in vivo endoscopic trigger finger release (ETFR) and present clinical outcomes after a single-portal antegrade ETFR technique.

METHODS

Endoscopic trigger finger release was performed on 40 cadaveric digits. Each digit was dissected and the following measurements were recorded: distance from palmar digital crease and A1 pulley, length of the A1 pulley, percentage of A1 pulley released, and injury to vulnerable anatomy. A retrospective chart review was performed on 48 patients (62 digits) treated with ETFR. Outcome measures included grip and pinch strength, range of motion, Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaires, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores.

RESULTS

Release of the A1 pulley was achieved in 33 of the 40 cadaveric digits (83%) with an A2 pulley laceration rate of 25%. No flexor tendon or neurovascular injuries occurred. Gross grasp, lateral pinch, 3-jaw chuck, and precision pinch strength had 85%, 90%, 82%, and 90% recovery, respectively. At the final follow-up, average metacarpophalangeal joint, proximal interphalangeal joint, and distal interphalangeal joint range of motion were within the normal limits. Mean VAS scores decreased from 5.7 preoperatively to 1.0 postoperatively and mean DASH score at the final follow-up was 4.8.

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of anatomical surface landmarks, ETFR may be performed in an efficient and reproducible manner. Patients treated with ETFR had low complication rates, good functional recovery, and improved pain at short-term follow-up. Further study of long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of ETFR is warranted.

Complications and side effects of Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) in upper limb surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT), a groundbreaking anaesthetic technique resurging in practice, warrants a comprehensive safety analysis for informed adoption. Our study aimed to identify complications/side effects of WALANT upper limb procedures through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

This PROSPERO-registered study was performed with strict adherence to PRISMA guidelines. Embase, OVIDMedline, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched until February 2023. Inclusion criteria involved English articles, reporting complications/side effects in primary WALANT upper limb surgeries. Outcomes included all complications and side effects, data on the anaesthetic mixture, publication year/location, study type, and procedures performed. The meta-analysis employed the Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation, computed I2 statistics, and utilized common or random effects models for pooled analysis.

RESULTS

2002 studies were identified; 79 studies met the inclusion criteria representing 15,595 WALANT patients. A total of 301 patients had complications, and the meta-analysis using a random effects model provided a complication rate of 1.7% (95% CI: 0.93-2.7%). The most reported complications were superficial infection (41%, n = 123/300), other/specified (12%, n = 37/300), and recurrent disease (6.7%, n = 20/300). A decade-by-decade analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in complication rates spanning the last three decades (p = 0.42). Adding sodium bicarbonate to the anaesthetic solution significantly reduced postoperative complications (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

WALANT has a low overall complication rate of 1.7%, with no significant temporal variation and a significant reduction in complications when sodium bicarbonate is added to the anaesthetic solution. Our findings support the safety of WALANT in upper limb procedures.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42023404018.

Comparative Study of A1 Pulley Release and Ulnar Superficialis Slip Resection in Trigger Finger With Flexion Contracture of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of A1 pulley release with ulnar superficialis slip resection (group A) and simple A1 pulley release (group B) in trigger finger with flexion contracture of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint.

METHODS

From January 2016 to December 2019, the 2 surgical procedures were performed alternately every year for trigger fingers with preoperative PIP joint flexion contractures of ≥10°. Twenty-six fingers in group A and 29 fingers in group B that were followed up for >1 year were reviewed in this retrospective study. The visual analog scale (VAS) score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score; degree of PIP joint flexion contracture; grip strength; and pinch strength were measured after surgery and compared.

RESULTS

The differences in postoperative PIP joint flexion contracture between groups were <4° at 2 and 6 weeks, and there were no clinically relevant differences at 6 weeks and 12 months. At the final follow-up, PIP joint flexion contractures of 5° were observed in 2 fingers in each group. The difference in VAS scores between groups was less than half of a point until 3 months, and there were no clinically relevant differences at 6 weeks and 12 months. The DASH score did not show any difference between groups at the final follow-up. There were clinically relevant differences in the grip and pinch strengths between groups at 6 weeks. However, there were no clinically relevant differences at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture measurements and clinical scores did not differ between groups at the final follow-up. Therefore, we recommend use of a simple A1 pulley release, which is simpler than an A1 pulley release with ulnar superficialis slip resection, in cases of trigger finger with PIP joint flexion contracture.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Sonographically controlled minimally-invasive A1 pulley release using a new guide instrument - a case series of 106 procedures in 64 patients

BACKGROUND

With percutaneous and minimally-invasive pulley release becoming more popular, safety and reliability of such minimally-invasive procedures remain a concern. Visualization of the technical steps by ultrasound suggests increased safety but shows the potential for harm to tendons, nerves and vessels without proper instrumentation. We present the results of implementing a sonographically guided minimally-invasive procedure in 106 trigger digits of 64 patients between 2018-2021.

METHODS

A guide instrument for use with a commercially available hook knife was developed and tested in 16 cadaver hands. Due to complication early in our clinical series this guide was modified in due course. A revised design of the guide has been in use since November 2019 with improved performance and safety.

RESULTS

One hundred six procedures in 64 patients were performed. After guide revision, we report a success rate of 97.3%. Complications after instrument revision include two cases of incomplete pulley release and one case of inadvertent skin laceration. The majority of patients report returning to all strenuous activities within two weeks at most apart from four individuals with prolonged postoperative discomfort.

CONCLUSION

We present the results of the development and implementation of a novel guide instrument for use with a hook knife to treat trigger finger. Despite several limitations of this study, we show that sonographically controlled, minimally-invasive A1 pulley release can be performed safely and effectively with appropriate surgical instruments and practice.

Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Excision for Trigger Finger - A Systematic Literature Review

Background: Division of one or more slips of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon has been posited as an effective surgical modality for advanced or recurrent trigger finger. This may be an effective approach among patients with diabetes or rheumatoid arthritis, or in those with fixed flexion deformities who have poor outcomes from A1 pulley release alone. However, there is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of this procedure. The role of this study was to systematically review the evidence on functional outcomes and safety of partial or complete FDS resection in the management of trigger finger. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL and Ovid Medline databases were electronically queried from their inception until February 2022. English language papers were included if they reported original data on postoperative outcomes and complications following resection of one or more slips of FDS for adult trigger finger. Results: Seven articles were eligible for inclusion, encompassing 420 fingers in 290 patients. All included studies were retrospective. Isolated ulnar slip FDS resection was the most described surgery. Mean postoperative fixed flexion deformity at the proximal interphalangeal joint was 6.0° compared to 31.5° preoperatively, and the proportion of patients with fixed flexion deformity reduced by 58%. Mean postoperative total active motion was 228.7°. Recurrence was seen in 4.7% of digits, and complications occurred in 11.2% of cases. No post-surgical ulnar drift or swan neck deformities were observed. Conclusions: FDS resection for long-standing trigger finger, or in diabetic or rheumatoid populations, is an effective and safe technique with low rates of recurrence. Prospective and comparative studies of this technique would be beneficial. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Ultrasound-Guided A1 Pulley Release Versus Classic Open Surgery for Trigger Digit: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

We compared an ultra-minimally invasive ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release and a classic open surgery for trigger digit.

METHODS

We designed a single-center randomized control trial. All cases had clinical signs of primary grade III trigger digit. Concealed allocation (1:1) was used for assigning patients to each group and data collectors were blinded. The Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) questionnaire was our primary variable. Quick-DASH, two-point discrimination, grip strength, time until stopping analgesics, having full digital range of motion and restarting everyday activities were registered on the 1st, 3rd, and 6th weeks, 3rd and 6th months, and 1st year after the procedure.

RESULTS

We randomized 84 patients to ultrasound-guided release and classic open surgery. Quick-DASH scores significantly favored the percutaneous technique until the 3rd month: 7.6 ± 1.2 versus 15.3 ± 2.4 (mean ± standard error of the mean). The percutaneous group obtained significantly better results in all the variables studied: time until stopping analgesics, achieving full range of motion and restarting everyday activities. Grip strength was significantly better in the percutaneous group for the 1st week only. Five cases of moderate local pain were observed in the open technique. There was one case of transient nerve numbness per group.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultra-minimally invasive ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release was clinically superior to the classic open surgery in functional recovery with a lower complication rate.

Prognostic factors related to recurrence of trigger finger after open surgical release in adults

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent trigger finger after surgery is one of the major adverse events. However, studies to identify factors associated with recurrence after open surgical release in adult trigger finger patients are still limited.

PURPOSE

To identify factors associated with recurrent trigger finger after open surgical release.

METHODS

This 12-year retrospective observational study included 723 patients with 841 trigger fingers who underwent open A1 pulley release. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: those with recurrent trigger finger after surgery and those without. Associations between potential predictors including age, sex, duration of symptoms, occupation status, active smoker status, number of steroid injections before surgery, and types of comorbidities and the outcome of interest, recurrence of trigger finger, were examined using univariable and multivariable analyses. The results are presented as hazard ratios (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

The recurrence rate after trigger finger release was 2.39% (20 of 841 fingers). After adjusting for confounders, more than 3 steroid injections before surgery and manual labor were the independent predictors of recurrent trigger finger (HR = 4.87, 95%CI = 1.06-22.35 and HR = 3.43, 95%CI = 1.15-10.23, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

More than 3 steroid injections before surgery and manual labor increase the risk of recurrent trigger finger after an open A1 pulley release. There may be limited benefit in administering a fourth steroid injection.

Treatment of advanced trigger finger by ulnar superficialis slip resection: Long-term outcome and predictive factors for poor prognosis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of ulnar superficialis slip resection and to determine predictive factors for poor prognosis in patients with advanced trigger finger. Over a 5-year-period, 55 patients (58 fingers) were included. After surgery, two groups were identified: group 1, with complete extension or <10° extension deficit in the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint (n = 27 fingers/27 patients); and group 2, with ≥10° residual PIP extension deficit (n = 31 fingers/28 patients). Factors associated with PIP extension deficit were assessed on logistic regression. There was a median extension gain of 20° (range, 10-30°) after surgery. The difference between pre- and post-operative extension deficits was significant (p < 0.001). There was no significant inter-group difference in DASH score (p > 0.9). Two predictive factors were found: >12 months' preoperative symptom duration (OR = 1.02; p = 0.045), and lack of self-rehabilitation (OR = 20; p < 0.001). Ulnar superficialis slip resection was effective in advanced trigger finger. Hand surgeons should operate early on these patients, and encourage self-rehabilitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Impact of WALANT Hand Surgery in a Secondary Care Hospital in Spain. Benefits to the Patient and the Health System

Purpose

The aim of this study is to compare patient benefits and economic costs of hand surgeries using the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique versus a conventional major outpatient suite and review outcomes and complications in a series of cases of patients operated on using the WALANT technique.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was first conducted comparing 150 cases of ambulatory hand surgery (carpal tunnel syndrome and trigger finger) using the WALANT technique and not requiring an operating room setting with 150 cases of outpatient surgery performed in an operating room involving a preoperative evaluation and the use of sedation and tourniquet. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pain was monitored, and days requiring postoperative analgesia were recorded. The resources and costs were evaluated. and patient satisfaction was assessed using a specific survey.Subsequently, 580 patient medical records were retrospectively reviewed, including 419 carpal tunnel syndrome and 197 trigger finger interventions (616 WALANT surgeries).

Results

Intraoperative pain was equivalent for both groups, and postoperative pain was significantly lower in the WALANT group, with a reduced need for analgesics. Satisfaction was greater for the local anesthesia group. The use of personnel resources and hospital materials was reduced in the WALANT group, with a total estimated cost savings of 1.019 USD per patient.There were no complications related to the WALANT technique and the lidocaine and adrenaline combination. We found a complication rate of 5.58%, and, in line with the literature, most complications were minor, managed conservatively, and not related to the anesthetic technique.

Conclusions

Procedures such as carpal tunnel and trigger finger surgeries can be safely performed using wide-awake surgery. Patient satisfaction is higher than with the conventional procedure performed in the operating room. Pain control is excellent, especially during the postoperative period.

Clinical relevance

Hand surgery patients benefit from the WALANT technique in terms of comfort and timeliness because there is no need for preoperative tests or evaluations. In addition, it represents significant savings in hospital resources. In our case series, complications were in line with those previously reported with other anesthetic techniques.

Temporal Relationship of Corticosteroid Injection and Open Release for Trigger Finger and Correlation With Postoperative Deep Infections

PURPOSE

Previous single-institution studies have shown a relationship between corticosteroid injection and infection after surgery if open trigger release occurs within 90 days. We queried an insurance claims database to evaluate the temporal relationship between a corticosteroid injection and the development of a surgical site infection requiring secondary surgery in patients undergoing trigger release.

METHODS

The PearlDiver database was queried for adults who underwent unilateral trigger finger release surgery from 2012 to 2018. The total number of injections, time from last injection to surgery, and preoperative antibiotic use were determined, in addition to the rates of postoperative administration of antibiotics and deep infection requiring surgery at 30, 60, and 90 days after surgery. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the odds of deep infection at 30, 60, and 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 14,686 patients were included; at least 1 corticosteroid injection was administered to 5,173 patients prior to surgery. When grouped based on whether a corticosteroid injection was administered prior to surgery, the postoperative infection rates between the groups were similar at 30, 60, and 90 days. When surgery was performed within 1 month of injection, increased odds of deep infection requiring irrigation and debridement were seen at 60 (odds ratio 2.92 [1.01-7.52]) and 90 days (odds ratio 3.01 [1.13-7.25]). Postoperative antibiotic use in the groups with and without a preoperative injection was similar at all queried time points, but patients who underwent open trigger finger release within 1 month of a prior injection had significantly increased odds (odds ratio 5.77 [1.41-22.06]) of using antibiotics after surgery. Male sex, a higher Elixhauser comorbidity index, and rheumatoid arthritis were additional independent risk factors for a deep infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo open trigger release within 1 month of a corticosteroid injection are at increased odds of developing a postoperative infection requiring surgical debridement.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Complications and Functional Outcomes following Trigger Finger Release: A Cohort Study of 1879 Patients

BACKGROUND

Although trigger finger release is considered a safe procedure, large cohort studies reporting consistent complication rates and functional outcomes are scarce. Further insight into outcomes of this commonly performed procedure is essential for adequate treatment evaluation and patient counseling. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the complication rates and functional outcomes following trigger finger release.

METHODS

This is an observational multicenter cohort study of patients undergoing trigger finger release. The primary outcome included the occurrence of complications. The secondary outcome was change in hand function (Michigan Hand outcomes Questionnaire) from baseline to 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Complications were observed in 17.1 percent of 1879 patients. Most complications were minor, requiring hand therapy or analgesics (7.0 percent of all patients), antibiotics, or steroid injections (7.8 percent). However, 2.1 percent required surgical treatment and 0.2 percent developed complex regional pain syndrome. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire total score improved from baseline to 3 months postoperatively with 12.7 points, although the authors found considerable variation in outcomes with less improvement in patients with better baseline scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that trigger finger release results in improved hand function, although complications occur in 17 percent. Most complications are minor and can be treated with nonsurgical therapy, resulting in improved hand function as well. However, additional surgical treatment is required in 2 percent of patients. In addition, the authors found that change in hand function depends on the baseline score, with less improvement in patients with better baseline scores. Future studies should investigate factors that contribute to the variability in treatment outcomes following trigger finger release.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment of Adult Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Accompanied with Trigger Digit

Purpose

To investigate the clinical characteristics and treatment of adult idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) accompanied with trigger digit.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on a total of 74 patients with adult idiopathic CTS accompanied with trigger digit admitted to and treated at the Hand Surgery Department of Ningbo No. 6 Hospital from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019. Data on patients' gender, age, occupation, course of the disease, menstruation, surgeries, examination-related information, complications, treatment methods, and prognoses during follow-up were recorded and subsequently used to analyze the pathogeneses, clinical characteristics, and treatment.

Results

A total of 74 patients (72 females and 2 males) were included. Among female patients, 51 were postmenopausal and 18 were non-postmenopausal. There were 101 fingers with trigger digit, including 14 patients with trigger digit in both hands, and 115 wrists affected by the CTS. The average course of CTS was 34.5 ± 49.3 months, and that of trigger digit was 10.5 ± 22.4 months. Seventy had both trigger digit and CTS in one hand, while among patients with both hands involved, only 4 had trigger digit or CTS in one hand. Eighty-nine fingers underwent A1 pulley release, and 104 hands underwent carpal tunnel surgery, with steroids being injected under the adventitia of the median nerve during the surgery. All patients who underwent surgeries had I/A-healed incisions, and 14 of them had obvious synovial hyperplasia observed in the carpal tunnel and flexor tendon sheath during surgeries. Follow-up visits, which lasted 3 to 35 months, had an average duration of 1.34 years and included 72 patients. In 63 patients (63/72), the syndrome of tenosynovitis and numbness disappeared and normal hand functions were restored; in 6 patients, the numbness in hands greatly improved and normal hand functions were almost completely restored, while no improvement in numbness of hands and limited hand functions were still observed in 3 patients.

Conclusion

CTS accompanied with trigger digit was more common in postmenopausal females, and the course of CTS was longer than that of trigger digit. CTS and trigger digit were more likely to simultaneously occur in the same hand, while some patients might not have obvious synovial hyperplasia in the carpal tunnel. Surgeries were effective in severe cases.

Office-Based Open Trigger Finger Release Has a Low Complication Rate

Purpose

Open trigger finger release is generally performed in the operating room in an outpatient setting. Its complication rate widely varies between 1% and 43%. Our goal was to determine whether performing this surgery in the clinic is a safe and viable alternative to performing this surgery in the operating room.

Methods

All open trigger finger releases performed at our clinic between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Each surgery was performed by the same fellowship-trained hand surgeon using a standard open technique with an Esmarch tourniquet and without the use of epinephrine. Five hundred twenty seven finger releases were performed in 514 patients. Complications were defined as signs or symptoms requiring further treatment.

Results

There were 33 documented complications in the 527 fingers (6.3%). The most common complications were minor wound complications, including 17 (3.2%) with localized cellulitis, 2 (0.4%) with a superficial infection, 4 (0.8%) with stitch abscesses, and 5 (0.9%) with wound dehiscence. All minor complications resolved quickly with oral antibiotics and supportive care. Five patients (0.9%) required further operative management. Of these 5, 2 (0.4%) had a deep infection, 1 had chronic dehiscence, and 2 (0.4%) required flexor tenosynovectomy for persistent pain and stiffness.

Conclusions

Patients who undergo open trigger finger release surgery in the clinic have complication rates similar to reported complication rates of surgery performed in the operating room.

Clinical relevance

Performing open trigger finger surgery in the office is safe. We continue to perform this surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, when access to operating rooms and personal protective equipment is limited.

Current Concepts in the Management of Advanced Trigger Finger: A Critical Analysis Review

»

While the majority of patients with trigger finger obtain excellent outcomes from nonoperative treatment or release of the A1 pulley, a subset of patients with advanced trigger finger, defined as trigger finger with loss of active or passive range of motion, may have incomplete symptom relief and warrant specific attention.

»

Advanced trigger finger is more refractory to complete symptom resolution from corticosteroid injection, and particular attention should be paid to incomplete improvement of flexion contractures.

»

Unlike simple trigger finger, the pathology in advanced trigger finger involves not only the A1 pulley but also the flexor tendon, including thickening and degeneration.

»

Progression toward surgical intervention should not be delayed when nonoperative measures fail, and specific attention should be paid to persistent inability to achieve full extension following A1 pulley release.

»

Facing substantial residual flexion contracture, reduction flexor tenoplasty and partial or complete resection of the superficialis tendon followed by hand therapy and splinting may be needed to allow patients to regain reliable full range of motion.

Unplanned Return to the Operating Room in Upper-Extremity Surgery: Incidence and Reason for Return

PURPOSE

Complications after upper-extremity surgery are generally infrequent. The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of early unplanned return to the operating room (URTO) within 3 months after surgery) in upper-extremity surgical procedures. Our hypotheses were that the rate of URTO in upper-extremity surgery would be low and that surgically treated fractures would be at greatest risk for complications.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all upper-extremity surgical procedures performed at a large academic practice of fellowship-trained hand surgeons over a 5-year period. A chart review was conducted of all patients who underwent a second surgery within 3 months of the initial surgery. The surgical billing database was queried to determine the incidence of URTO per Current Procedural Terminology code.

RESULTS

There were 422 Current Procedural Terminology codes with URTO out of a total of 62,608, for an incidence of 0.6%. The most frequently performed procedures were carpal tunnel release (10,674; 0.1% URTO), trigger finger release (4,549; 0.5% URTO), and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for distal radius fracture (2,728; 1.2% URTO). Procedures with the highest incidences of URTO were open reduction and internal fixation of the ulna (4.9%) and excision of the olecranon bursa (4.1%). Traumatic injuries were more commonly associated with URTO compared with elective procedures. Bony trauma and soft tissue trauma had URTO incidences of 1.4% and 1.1%, respectively, whereas bony elective and soft tissue elective cases were 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 90-day URTO rate after upper-extremity surgery was low but higher than previously reported 30-day reoperation rates. Elbow procedures were most likely to result in URTO, as were procedures relating to bony and soft tissue trauma. Based on these results, we are able to counsel patients that the most common procedures we perform have low URTO rates, but surgically treated fractures are at greatest risk.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

A cadaveric assessment of percutaneous trigger finger release with 15° stab knife: its effectiveness and complications

Percutaneous release of the A1 pulley has been introduced as a therapeutic approach for trigger fingers and is suggested as an effective and safe alternative, where conservative treatments fail. The aim of the current study was to determine if percutaneous release with a 15° stab knife can effectively result in acceptable efficacy and lower complication rate.

METHODS

In the present study, the percutaneous release of the A1 pulley was evaluated by percutaneous release using a 15° stab knife in 20 fresh-frozen cadaver hands (10 cadavers). One hundred fingers were finally included in the present study. The success rate of A1 pulley release as well as the complications of this method including digital vascular injury, A2 pulley injury, and superficial flexor tendon injury was evaluated, and finally, the data were analyzed by the SPSS software.

RESULTS

The results showed a success rate of 75% for A1 pulley release in four fingers, followed by eleven fingers (90%) and eighty-five fingers (100%). Therefore, the A1 pulley was found to be completely released in eighty-five fingers (100%). Overall, the mean of A1 pulley release for these fingers was determined as 97.9%, indicating that percutaneous trigger finger release can be an effective technique using a 15° stab knife. Furthermore, our findings revealed no significant difference in the amount of A1 pulley release in each of the fingers in the right and left hands. Additionally, 17 fingers developed superficial scrape in flexor tendons, while 83 fingers showed no flexor tendons injuries and no other injuries (i.e., vascular, digital nerve, and A2 pulley injuries).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous release of the A1 pulley using a 15° stab knife was contributed to acceptable efficacy and a relatively good safety in the cadaveric model.

Variation in the clinical commissioning of surgery for three common hand conditions in England

The surgical referral policies for patients with trigger finger, ganglion removal and Dupuytren's disease were collected for all Clinical Commissioning Groups in England. The aim was to assess whether there was variation in the policies across England, resulting in inequality in patients' access to surgery. Data were collected between October 2018 and January 2019 and compared with national guidelines. Analysis of the results showed that for all three conditions, surgical commissioning policies varied depending on the locality. The results also show that despite the existence of national guidelines, they are not implemented. This has the potential to lead to variation in surgical referral and access to services for patients in different localities in England.Level of evidence: III.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for trigger finger

BACKGROUND

Trigger finger is a common hand condition that occurs when movement of a finger flexor tendon through the first annular (A1) pulley is impaired by degeneration, inflammation, and swelling. This causes pain and restricted movement of the affected finger. Non-surgical treatment options include activity modification, oral and topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), splinting, and local injections with anti-inflammatory drugs.

OBJECTIVES

To review the benefits and harms of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus placebo, glucocorticoids, or different NSAIDs administered by the same route for trigger finger.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, www.ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO trials portal until 30 September 2020. We applied no language or publication status restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised trials of adult participants with trigger finger that compared NSAIDs administered topically, orally, or by injection versus placebo, glucocorticoid, or different NSAIDs administered by the same route.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two or more review authors independently screened the reports, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and GRADE certainty of evidence. The seven major outcomes were resolution of trigger finger symptoms, persistent moderate or severe symptoms, recurrence of symptoms, total active range of finger motion, residual pain, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Treatment effects were reported as risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

Two RCTs conducted in an outpatient hospital setting were included (231 adult participants, mean age 58.6 years, 60% female, 95% to 100% moderate to severe disease). Both studies compared a single injection of a non-selective NSAID (12.5 mg diclofenac or 15.0 mg ketorolac) given at lower than normal doses with a single injection of a glucocorticoid (triamcinolone 20 mg or 5 mg), with maximum follow-up duration of 12 weeks or 24 weeks. In both studies, we detected risk of attrition and performance bias. One study also had risk of selection bias. The effects of treatment were sensitive to assumptions about missing outcomes. All seven outcomes were reported in one study, and five in the other. NSAID injection may offer little to no benefit over glucocorticoid injection, based on low- to very low-certainty evidence from two trials. Evidence was downgraded for bias and imprecision. There may be little to no difference between groups in resolution of symptoms at 12 to 24 weeks (34% with NSAIDs, 41% with glucocorticoids; absolute effect 7% lower, 95% confidence interval (CI) 16% lower to 5% higher; 2 studies, 231 participants; RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.11; low-certainty evidence). The rate of persistent moderate to severe symptoms may be higher at 12 to 24 weeks in the NSAIDs group (28%) compared to the glucocorticoid group (14%) (absolute effect 14% higher, 95% CI 2% to 33% higher; 2 studies, 231 participants; RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.46; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether NSAIDs result in fewer recurrences at 12 to 24 weeks (1%) compared to glucocorticoid (21%) (absolute effect 20% lower, 95% CI 21% to 13% lower; 2 studies, 231 participants; RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.38; very low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between groups in mean total active motion at 24 weeks (235 degrees with NSAIDs, 240 degrees with glucocorticoid) (absolute effect 5% lower, 95% CI 34.54% lower to 24.54% higher; 1 study, 99 participants; MD -5.00, 95% CI -34.54 to 24.54; low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between groups in residual pain at 12 to 24 weeks (20% with NSAIDs, 24% with glucocorticoid) (absolute effect 4% lower, 95% CI 11% lower to 7% higher; 2 studies, 231 participants; RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.31; low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between groups in participant-reported treatment success at 24 weeks (64% with NSAIDs, 68% with glucocorticoid) (absolute effect 4% lower, 95% CI 18% lower to 15% higher; 1 study, 121 participants; RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.23; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether NSAID injection has an effect on adverse events at 12 to 24 weeks (1% with NSAIDs, 1% with glucocorticoid) (absolute effect 0% difference, 95% CI 2% lower to 3% higher; 2 studies, 231 participants; RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.19 to 21.42; very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For adults with trigger finger, by 24 weeks' follow-up, results from two trials show that compared to glucocorticoid injection, NSAID injection offered little to no benefit in the treatment of trigger finger. Specifically, there was no difference in resolution, symptoms, recurrence, total active motion, residual pain, participant-reported treatment success, or adverse events.

Open Surgery for Trigger Finger Required Combined a1-a2 Pulley Release. A Retrospective Study on 1305 Case

OBJECTIVES

We retrospectively reviewed 1305 open-surgery for idiopathic trigger finger performed by 4 senior hand surgeons between 2014 and 2016.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medical records and a telephone interview made with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were used to identify the recurrent rate of triggering and other complications.

RESULTS

This retrospective study let us note that 169 fingers (13%) required simultaneous release of the A1-A2 pulleys because the sectioning of the A1 pulley alone did not lead to complete free sliding of the tendons. We did not record any bowstring complication and we ascribe this to both surgery and bandaging technique. Overall rate of complication was 11.8% and relapse triggering or permanent proximal interphalangeal joint flexion (PPIJF) were among them; notably, however, they occurred only in patients where the A2 pulley was not sectioned.

CONCLUSIONS

Is possible to reduce the percentage of relapse triggering or PPIJF after trigger finger surgery, by performing that combined A1-A2 pulley release.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

A prospective, randomized clinical trial of transverse versus longitudinal incisions for trigger finger release

We investigated whether incision type affects scar quality or outcome following trigger finger release. Our primary and secondary hypotheses were that transverse and longitudinal incision types yield similar scar quality and functional improvement. Digits undergoing trigger finger release at the participating hospitals were randomized to receive transverse or longitudinal incisions. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale, Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score were collected at 8 and 54 weeks postoperatively. Of 86 randomized patients, 67 patients (71%) had followed-up at 54 weeks postoperatively. We found no significant differences in above three assessments between the incisions at either time-point. Among patients receiving both incision types for multiple simultaneous trigger finger release, there were no significant differences in Patient Scar Assessment Scale or Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores. We found no significant difference in the scar quality and improvement in patient-reported disability with transverse or longitudinal incisions for trigger finger release. Level of evidence: II.

Factors Causing Prolonged Postoperative Symptoms Despite Absence of Complications After A1 Pulley Release for Trigger Finger

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the incidence and prognostic factors for prolonged postoperative symptoms after open A1 pulley release in patients with trigger finger, despite absence of any complications.

METHODS

We reviewed 109 patients (78 single-finger involvement, 31 multiple-finger involvement) who underwent open A1 pulley release for trigger finger from 2010 to 2016, with 8 weeks or longer postsurgical follow-up and without postoperative complications. The group had 16 men and 93 women, with mean age of 56 years (range, 21-81 years), and average follow-up period of 24.8 weeks (range, 8.0-127.4 weeks). Prolonged postoperative symptoms were defined as symptoms persisting for longer than 8 weeks after surgery. Factors analyzed for delay in recovery included duration of preoperative symptoms; number of preoperative local corticosteroid injections; preoperative flexion contracture of proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint; multiplicity of trigger finger lesions; occupation; presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, other hand disorders like carpal tunnel syndrome, de Quervain disease, or Dupuytren contracture; and fraying or partial tear of the flexor tendon.

RESULTS

Twenty-six fingers (19.3%) showed prolonged postoperative symptoms, with mean time until complete relief being 14.0 ± 6.4 weeks (range, 9-34 weeks). Risk factors associated with prolonged postoperative symptoms included duration of preoperative symptoms, preoperative flexion contracture of the PIP joint, and fraying or partial tear of the flexor tendon.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should consider the duration of preoperative symptoms and preoperative flexion contracture of the PIP joint when deciding timing of surgery for trigger finger patients. In addition, they should explain to patients with a positive history of these factors and in whom flexor tendon injury is found during surgery about the possibility of prolonged postoperative symptoms.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Preoperative Hypoglycemia Increases Infection Risk After Trigger Finger Injection and Release

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus is a well-known risk factor for infection after trigger finger (TF) injection and/or release. However, the effect of preoperative hypoglycemia before TF injection or release is currently unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of preoperative hypoglycemia on infection incidence after TF injection or release.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective cohort review between 2007 and 2015 was conducted using a national private payer database within the PearlDiver Supercomputer. Preoperative, fasting, glucose levels were collected for each patient, and these ranged from 20 to 219 mg/dL. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates were determined using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes.

RESULTS

The query of the PearlDiver database returned 153,479 TF injections, of which 3479 (2.27%) and 6276 (4.09%) had infections within 90 days and 1 year after procedure, respectively. There were 70,290 TF releases identified, with 1887 (2.68%) SSIs captured within 3 months after surgery and 3144 (4.47%) within 1 year after surgery. There was a statistically significant increase in SSI rates in patients with hypoglycemia within 90-day (P = 0.006) and 1-year (P < 0.001) time intervals post-TF injection. Likewise, a statistically significant increase in SSI rate in patients with hypoglycemia undergoing TF release within 1 year after release was seen (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypoglycemia before TF injection or release increases the risk for SSI. Tight glycemic control may be warranted to mitigate this risk. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of hypoglycemia as an independent risk factor for SSI.

Thirty-Day Reoperation and/or Admission After Elective Hand Surgery in Adults: A 10-Year Review

PURPOSE

Whereas acute complications following elective hand surgery have been assumed to be rare, the incidence of 30-day unplanned reoperation and/or admission for the most common elective procedures has not been well described. Our goal was to calculate the incidence and identify the risk factors associated with these complications in a busy academic practice.

METHODS

Our institution's quality assurance database was examined retrospectively for unplanned reoperations and/or admissions within 30 days in adults undergoing elective procedures with 2 senior attending surgeons from February 2006 to January 2016. Each event was categorized by causative factor and charts were reviewed to establish risk factors and cultured organisms. Our billing database was examined for the concomitant procedural volume.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 18,081 surgeries (57.6% carpal tunnel or trigger digit releases), 27 patients had an unplanned reoperation and/or admission within 30 days (0.15% total incidence; including carpal tunnel release, 0.10%; trigger digit release, 0.09%; major wrist surgery, 0.74%) including 17 infections (0.09%). These were unevenly distributed over time after surgery with 29.6% occurring within 7 days, 59.2% in 8 to 14 days, 11.1% in 15 to 21 days, and none between 22 and 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperations and/or unplanned admission within 30 days after elective hand surgery are infrequent (15 per 10,000 cases) and are most commonly related to infections (63.0%). More invasive surgeries are associated with a higher incidence than simpler procedures, and these complications are most likely to occur within 3 weeks after surgery. These data in elective patients do not cover certain clinically relevant outcomes, such as chronic pain or limited function, and may not be generalizable to all practices.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Open Surgery Versus Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection for Trigger Finger: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 1-Year Follow-up

PURPOSE

Trigger finger is a common condition with a lifetime prevalence of 2%. Corticosteroid injection is a treatment often considered as a first-line intervention with reported cure rates between 60% and 90% in observational cohorts. Nevertheless, open surgery remains the most effective treatment with reported cure rates near 100%. Head-to-head trials on these treatments are limited. We investigated the efficacy of open surgery compared with ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections.

METHODS

The study was performed as a single-center, randomized, controlled trial with a 1-year follow-up. A total of 165 patients received either open surgery (n = 81) or ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection (n = 84). Follow-up was conducted at 3 and 12 months. If the finger had normal movement or normal movement with discomfort at latest follow-up, the outcome was considered a success. Secondary outcomes were postprocedural pain and complications.

RESULTS

The groups were similar at baseline except for lower alcohol consumption in the open surgery group. At 3 months, 86% and 99% were successfully treated after corticosteroid injection and open surgery, respectively. At 12 months, 49% and 99% were considered successfully treated after corticosteroid injection and open surgery, respectively. The pain score at latest follow-up was significantly higher in the corticosteroid injection group. Complications after open surgery were more severe and included 3 superficial infections and 1 iatrogenic nerve lesion. After corticosteroid injection 11 patients experienced a steroid flare and 2 had fat necrosis at the site of injection.

CONCLUSIONS

Open surgery is superior to ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections. Complications after open surgery are more severe; this must be taken into account when advising patients with regard to treatment.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic I.

Outcomes of percutaneous trigger finger release with concurrent steroid injection

Percutaneous release (PR) of the A1 pulley is a quick, safe, and minimally invasive procedure for treating trigger fingers. The purpose of this study is to identify if PR with additional steroid injections can shorten the recovery to reach unlimited range of motion. Between January 2013 and December 2013, we included 432 trigger fingers with actively correctable triggering or severer symptoms without previous surgical release or steroid injections from two hand clinic offices (A and B). The same experienced surgeon performed PR at the office. Patients from Clinic A received PR with steroid injections and those from Clinic B received PR without steroid injections. Patients returned for follow-up 1 week, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after the procedure. Between the steroid group and the nonsteroid group, there is no significant difference in the mean time for patients to return to normal work and the rate of residual extensor lag. Middle fingers showed a 5.09-fold chance of having a residual extensor lag over that of the other fingers. High grade trigger fingers recovered more slowly than low grade ones. The success rate of a 12-week follow-up was 98.4%. There was no significant difference between the steroid group (97.5%) and the nonsteroid group (99.1%). PR can treat trigger fingers effectively, but additional steroid injection does not provide more benefit. Some fingers showed temporary extensor lag, especially in middle fingers and high grade trigger fingers, but 85% of those will eventually reach full recovery after self-rehabilitation without another surgical release.

Trigger digit release: rates of surgery and complications as indicated by a United States Medicare database

A United States insurance database was examined for trigger digit release using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision diagnoses and procedures or Current Procedural Terminology codes. Complications after trigger digit release, including stiffness, infection and revision surgery, were assessed. A total of 209,634 patients who underwent trigger digit release were included. The rate of trigger digit release increased significantly from 2005 to 2012, with the middle finger the most frequently released. The rate of postoperative stiffness was low, ranging from 0.8% to 1.6% depending on the operated digit. The rate of postoperative infection was lower, ranging from 0.5% to 0.6%. The need for revision within 3 years of initial trigger digit release was also low, ranging from 0.3% to 0.8%. Complications, including infection, stiffness and revision surgery, occur infrequently, but certain factors, including diabetes, Dupuytren's disease, smoking, rheumatoid arthritis, obesity and age, increase risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III, Retrospective comparative study.

Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous trigger finger releases (TFRs) performed in the office setting are becoming more prevalent. This study compares the costs of in-hospital open TFRs, open TFRs performed in ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), and in-office percutaneous releases.

METHODS

An expected-value decision-analysis model was constructed from the payer perspective to estimate total costs of the three competing treatment strategies for TFR. Model parameters were estimated based on the best available literature and were tested using multiway sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

Percutaneous TFR performed in the office and then, if needed, revised open TFR performed in the ASC, was the most cost-effective strategy, with an attributed cost of $603. The cost associated with an initial open TFR performed in the ASC was approximately 7% higher. Initial open TFR performed in the hospital was the least cost-effective, with an attributed cost nearly twice that of primary percutaneous TFR.

DISCUSSION

An initial attempt at percutaneous TFR is more cost-effective than an open TFR. Currently, only about 5% of TFRs are performed in the office; therefore, a substantial opportunity exists for cost savings in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Decision model level II.

Evaluation of Percutaneous First Annular Pulley Release: Efficacy and Complications in a Perfused Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

Trigger finger is the most common entrapment tendinopathy, with a lifetime risk of 2% to 3%. Open surgical release of the flexor tendon sheath is a commonly performed procedure associated with a high rate of success. Despite reported success rates of over 94%, percutaneous trigger finger release (PFTR) remains a controversial procedure because of the risk of iatrogenic digital neurovascular injury. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of traditional percutaneous and ultrasound (US)-guided first annular (A1) pulley releases performed on a perfused cadaveric model.

METHODS

First annular pulley releases were performed percutaneously using an 18-gauge needle in 155 digits (124 fingers and 31 thumbs) of un-embalmed cadavers with restored perfusion. A total of 45 digits were completed with US guidance and 110 digits were completed without it. Each digit was dissected and assessed regarding the amount of release as well as neurovascular, flexor tendon, and A2 pulley injury.

RESULTS

Overall, 114 A1 pulleys were completely released (74%). There were 38 partial releases (24%) and 3 complete misses (2%). No significant flexor tendon injury was seen. Longitudinal scoring of the flexor tendon was found in 35 fingers (23%). There were no lacerations to digital nerves and one ulnar digital artery was partially lacerated (1%) in a middle finger with a partial flexion contracture that prevented appropriate hyperextension. The ultrasound-assisted and blind PTFR techniques had similar complete pulley release and injury rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Both traditional and US-assisted percutaneous release of the A1 pulley can be performed for all fingers. Perfusion of cadaver digits enhances surgical simulation and evaluation of PTFR beyond those of previous cadaveric studies. The addition of vascular flow to the digits during percutaneous release allows for Doppler flow assessment of the neurovascular bundle and evaluation of vascular injury.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our cadaveric data align with those of published clinical investigations for percutaneous A1 pulley release.

Early Patient Satisfaction with Different Treatment Pathways for Trigger Finger and Thumb

Little is known about factors related to patient satisfaction with treatment for trigger digits. This study tested the null hypothesis that there are no factors associated with treatment satisfaction 2 months after completion of treatment (absence of triggering) or 4 months after the last visit for patients with a trigger thumb or finger. Secondary null hypotheses were: 1) There are no factors associated with a change in patients' preferred treatment before and after consultation with a hand surgeon; and 2) Initial treatment provided is not different from final received treatment. In an observational study, 63 English-speaking adult patients were enrolled after being diagnosed with one or more new idiopathic trigger digits by one of two hand surgeons, but before the hand surgeon discussed treatment options. Patients were asked to fill out questionnaires at enrollment. Final evaluation was by phone. Satisfaction with treatment was not related to the initial treatment or other patient or disease factors. Twenty-three patients (37 %) had a different preference for treatment after talking with a hand surgeon. Involvement of the long and ring fingers were the only factors associated with staying with pre-visit treatment preferences. There was a significant difference in proportions of the various treatments provided at enrollment and final treatment recorded at the final phone evaluation, 14 patients (22 %) had a subsequent alternative form of treatment. Patients' preferences for trigger finger treatment often change after consulting with a hand surgeon and during treatment, but these choices do not affect treatment satisfaction.

Ultrasound-Guided Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Trigger Finger: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of ultrasound-guided injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) versus steroid for trigger fingers in adults.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

PARTICIPANTS

Subjects with a diagnosis of trigger finger (N=36; 39 affected digits) received treatment and were evaluated.

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects were randomly assigned to HA and steroid injection groups. Both study medications were injected separately via ultrasound guidance with 1 injection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The classification of trigger grading, pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction were evaluated before the injection and 3 weeks and 3 months after the injection.

RESULTS

At 3 months, 12 patients (66.7%) in the HA group and 17 patients (89.5%) in the steroid group exhibited no triggering of the affected fingers (P=.124). The treatment results at 3 weeks and 3 months showed similar changes in the Quinnell scale (P=.057 and .931, respectively). A statistically significant interaction effect between group and time was found for visual analog scale (VAS) and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ) evaluation (P<.05). The steroid group had a lower VAS at 3 months after injection (steroid 0.5±1.1 vs HA 2.7±2.4; P<.001). The HA group demonstrated continuing significant improvement in MHQ at 3 months (change from 3wk: steroid -2.6±14.1 vs HA 19.1±37.0; P=.023; d=.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided injection of HA demonstrated promising results for the treatment of trigger fingers. The optimal frequency, dosage, and molecular weight of HA injections for trigger fingers deserve further investigation for future clinical applications.

Risk factors for complications of open trigger finger release

BACKGROUND

Open trigger finger release is generally considered a simple low-risk procedure. Reported complication rates vary widely from 1 to 43 %, mostly based on small studies. Our goal was to determine the incidence of complications in a large consecutive series, while also identifying potential risk factors.

METHODS

All open trigger finger releases performed from 2006 to 2009 by four fellowship-trained hand surgeons at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. There were 795 digits released in 543 patients. Complications were defined as signs or symptoms requiring further treatment and/or considered unresolved by 1 month postoperatively. Complications requiring operative intervention were regarded as major. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine possible risk factors for complications.

RESULTS

There were 95 documented complications among 795 digits (12 %). The most common complications involved persistent pain, stiffness, or swelling, persistent or recurrent triggering, or superficial infection. Most were treated nonoperatively with observation, therapy, steroid injection, or oral antibiotics. There were 19 reoperations (2.4 %), mostly including revision release, tenosynovectomy, and irrigation and debridement. Male gender, sedation, and general anesthesia were independently associated with complications, while age, diabetes, hypothyroidism, recent injection, and concurrent procedures were not associated.

CONCLUSIONS

Open trigger finger release is generally a low-risk procedure, although there is potential for complications, some requiring reoperation. Male gender, sedation, and general anesthesia may be associated with greater risk. Surgeons should be careful to thoroughly discuss the risk of both major and minor complications when counseling patients.

Biomechanical analyses of the human flexor tendon adhesion models in the hand: A cadaveric study

Patients with longstanding trigger finger may develop flexion contracture at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint that persists even after division of the A1 pulley. The purpose of this study was to explore the hypothesis that flexion deformity of the PIP joint in advanced trigger finger is caused by severe adhesion between the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendons. Ten freshly frozen cadaveric hands were used in the experiments. After preparation of the extrinsic flexor, extrinsic extensor, and intrinsic muscle tendons, we applied weights to the flexor tendons and minimal tension to the extrinsic extensor and intrinsic muscle tendons. We then measured the initial flexion angles of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and PIP joints. Next, we measured the flexion angles of the MCP and PIP joints as increasing tension was applied to the extrinsic extensor and intrinsic muscle tendons, respectively. We repeated these experiments after constructing flexor tendon adhesion model. The initial flexion angles of the MCP and PIP joints were greater in the adhesion model, as were the average tensions required for full extension of these joints. Our results suggest that adhesion between two flexor tendons contributes to progression of flexion deformity in the PIP joint.

Percutaneous first annular pulley release for trigger digits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence

PURPOSE

To determine the overall success rate and potential influencing factors within the current evidence for percutaneous first annular pulley release.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for all clinical studies of percutaneous release. The rates of successful procedure and complication were extracted and analyzed. We charted the overall success rate on a forest plot with 95% confidence intervals. Data of success rates were analyzed in 5- and 10-year intervals to determine whether the rate of success had increased chronologically. We then performed 3 subgroup analyses according to instrument type (needles vs knife blades), cortisone use (cortisone vs noncortisone), and sonography guidance (sonography vs non-sonography guidance). Pooled success rates were calculated in the subgroups and compared using chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 34 studies involving 2,114 percutaneous procedures were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The total success rate was 94%. There was a trend toward increasing number of publications in the past 20 years. We found a statistically significant trend showing that overall success rates had increased over time. Chi-square test revealed that percutaneous release with sonography guidance had a significantly higher success rate than non-sonography guidance. There were no significant differences in other subgroup analyses including instrument type and cortisone use.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous release is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of trigger digit. It has become progressively popular in recent years, with a trend toward increased overall success. Sonography might be a helpful tool for maximizing success. The success rates were not affected by instruments and cortisone use.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

PROSPECTIVE STUDY ON THE MANAGEMENT OF TRIGGER FINGER

Trigger finger is one of the very common conditions encountered in hand surgery. Currently, the treatment modes we offer in our clinics are combination therapy of topical NSAIDS, occupational therapy and splinting or invasive modes involving corticosteroid injections and trigger finger release.

This is a prospective review looking at the outcomes of the various initial treatment modules currently used for treating trigger fingers and the rate of surgery following non-surgical treatment.

From our study we have noted that 26% of the digits which were subjected to combination therapy eventually underwent surgery whereas 60% of digits which received corticosteroid injections underwent surgery. Even though our results comparing operation rates are not statistically significant, they appear to show that combination therapy was more effective in avoiding surgery than corticosteroid injection in lower grades of trigger.

Sonographic analyses of pulley and flexor tendon in idiopathic trigger finger with interphalangeal joint contracture

This study investigated the sonographic appearance of the pulley and flexor tendon in idiopathic trigger finger in correlation with the contracture of the interphalangeal (IP) joint in the thumb or proximal IP (PIP) joint in the other digits. Sonographic measurements using axial images were performed in 177 affected digits including 17 thumbs and 34 other digits judged to have IP or PIP joint contracture and 77 contralateral control digits. The A1 pulley of the contracture group was significantly thicker than that of the non-contracture group in all digits, whereas the flexor tendon was thicker only in digits other than the thumb. In the analysis using calculated cut-off values, A1 pulley thickening in the thumb and A1 pulley and flexor tendon thickening in the other digits showed statistically significant correlations with IP or PIP joint contracture. This study sonographically confirmed previous reports showing that enlargement of the flexor tendons contribute to the pathogenesis of PIP joint contracture.

Trigger finger appearing as gradually increasing digital nerve disorder after surgical treatment

Trigger finger is a common disease, and operative treatments are often applied for it. Digital nerve injury is one of the complications of this surgical treatment, and paresthesia and sensory disturbance occur early after the operation. This paper presents a case of trigger finger appearing gradually as increasing digital nerve disorder after surgical treatment. In the second surgery, scar tissue covered the palmar MP joint where the A1 pulley had existed before, and palmar digital neurovascular tissue of the ulnar side was found on the inside of the scar. The ulnar digital nerve showed swelling like a neuroma, and bilateral digital nerves existed nearer to the center of the flexor pollicis longus tendon than normal digital nerves. Even when we operate on trigger finger by open release, we should create an appropriate surgical space for observation and be careful of digital nerve injury.

Resection of the flexor digitorum superficialis for trigger finger with proximal interphalangeal joint positional contracture

PURPOSE

Open release of the A1 pulley is a widely known procedure for the treatment of trigger finger. A subset of patients presents with both trigger finger and a positional contracture of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. These patients usually have a long history of trigger finger or have already undergone a surgical release of the annular pulley. This study is a retrospective review of the outcomes of resection of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) for patients whose trigger finger was associated with a positional contracture of the PIP joint.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients (39 fingers) were treated by resection of the FDS after section of the A1 pulley. The mean age of the patients was 63 years (range, 45-90 y). Seven patients (19 %) had previously undergone an open release of the A1 pulley and had developed a positional contracture of the PIP joint 2 to 5 months afterward. We performed a retrospective review with a mean follow-up of 30 months (range, 12-60 mo). No patient was lost to follow-up. The active range of motion was recorded at the PIP joint before and after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative positional contracture of the PIP joint was 24° (range, 15°-30°). The mean postoperative positional contracture of the PIP joint was 4° (range, 0°-10°). The most commonly affected digit was the middle finger (26 fingers, 67%). In 28 fingers (72%), full extension was achieved following only the surgical procedure. The remaining 11 fingers (28%) had a postoperative residual positional contracture (range, 5°-10°). However, all fingers achieved a full range of motion after physical therapy and an injection of betamethasone. All of the resected tendons had histological damage.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique is a useful treatment for selected patients whose trigger finger is associated with a positional contracture.

Adverse events of open A1 pulley release for idiopathic trigger finger

PURPOSE

To classify and report adverse events of trigger finger release in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1,598 trigger finger releases performed by 12 surgeons in 984 patients between 2001 and 2011. Adverse events were classified based on a system derived from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria and clinical experience. Risk factors for various adverse events were sought in bivariate and multivariable statistical analysis.

RESULTS

At the latest follow-up, 66 patients (7%), or 84 operated trigger digits (5%), experienced a documented adverse event. The most common adverse events were recovery issues in 46 patients (3%) (such as postoperative symptoms treated with steroid injection or slow recovery of motion treated with hand therapy), wound problems in 30 patients (2%) (consisting of suture abscess, superficial infection, or wound separation), persistent postoperative triggering in 10 patients (0.6%), and recurrent triggering in 4 patients (0.3%). Diabetes mellitus was associated with wound problems, slow recovery of motion, and recurrence. Concomitant carpal tunnel release on the same side was associated with slow recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Fourteen patients, less than 1%, in this cohort experienced an adverse event, such as persistent or recurrent triggering, requiring secondary surgery. No nerve injury or deep infection occurred in our cohort. One in 15 patients experienced a minor transient or treatable adverse event, and patients with diabetes were at greater risk.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

A retrospective review to determine the long-term efficacy of orthotic devices for trigger finger

PURPOSE

To evaluate the use of orthotic devices (splints) in an attempt to resolve trigger finger.

METHODS

Data were extracted from 46 charts during a five-year period from January 2005 to December 2010. At ten weeks, patients were seen for follow-up assessment of pain and stage of stenosing tenosynovitis (SST). One-year follow-up was performed to determine if the patients required further surgical intervention or steroid injection. The data were analyzed to determine the efficacy of orthosis intervention.

RESULTS

Mean pain score preorthotic is 5.63 and postorthotic is 1.20. Mean SST score preorthotic is 3.93 and postorthotic is 1.21. There was an 87% (40 patients) success rate with the orthotic intervention; 4.3% (two patients) had surgery and 8.5% (four patients) received a steroid injection in the year after orthotic application.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the efficacy of orthoses for the reduction of pain and SST score for patients who have trigger finger.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Follow-up investigation of open trigger digit release

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify the postoperative complications and disorders associated with open trigger finger release. Factors that were investigated by this study included demographic details, the number of digits affected, BMI, level of manual strain, trauma, received systemic medication, hand dominance, pre-treatment with steroid injection, and concomitant diseases.

METHODS

One hundred and three patients, who underwent open release surgery for 117 trigger fingers and thumbs, were followed up until complete resolution of all complaints. Patients' age, BMI, hand dominance, occupational manual strain, and previous medical history regarding trigger finger or thumb were obtained. Associated conditions and medical treatment, trauma, and previous hand surgical interventions were included as well. Details regarding duration of complaints, ROM, visual analogue pain scale, swelling, recurrence of the disease following previous surgical release, and persistence of complaints following corticosteroid injection were examined.

RESULTS

The dominant hand was not significantly more frequently affected than the non-dominant hand. Occupation also did not influence the incidence of trigger digit. Patients with systemic steroid therapy had a significantly shorter duration of postoperative symptoms with a mean duration of 29.3 days (range, 28-31 days ± 1.3). Significantly less postoperative swelling was noticed in patients with a pre-surgical steroid injection. The mean duration of symptoms before and after surgery was significantly shorter for a trigger thumb than for trigger finger.

DISCUSSION

Open trigger digit release constitutes an adequate low-risk surgical procedure for treatment of trigger digit. In this study, we could show that the incidence of this disease is not significantly correlated with the manual strain, trauma, BMI, hand dominance or concomitant diseases like diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, renal insufficiency, and hypothyroidism. Additionally, this study illustrates the importance of a careful postoperative follow-up treatment to avoid potential persistent functional limitations.

Ultrasound-guided injection of a corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid: a potential new approach to the treatment of trigger finger

Background and Objectives: Stenosing tenosynovitis (trigger finger) is one of the most common causes of pain and disability in the hand, which may often require treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroid injection, or open surgery. However, there is still large room for improvement in the treatment of this condition by corticosteroid injection. The mechanical, viscoelastic, and antinociceptive properties of hyaluronic acid may potentially support the use of this molecule in association with corticosteroids for the treatment of trigger finger. This study examines the feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided injection of a corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid compared, for the first time, with open surgery for the treatment of trigger finger.

Methods: This was a monocentric, open-label, randomized study. Consecutive patients aged between 35 and 70 years with ultrasound-confirmed diagnosis of trigger finger were included. Patients were randomly assigned to either ultrasound-guided injection of methylprednisolone acetate 40 mg/mL with 0.8mL lidocaine into the flexor sheath plus injection of 1mL hyaluronic acid 0.8% 10 days later (n = 15; group A), or to open surgical release of the first annular pulley (n = 15; group B). Clinical assessment of the digital articular chain was conducted prior to treatment and after 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months. The duration of abstention from work and/or sports activity, and any treatment complications or additional treatment requirements (e.g. physiotherapy, compression, medication) were also recorded.

Results: Fourteen patients (93.3%) in group A had complete symptom resolution at 6 months, which persisted for 12 months in 11 patients (73.3%), while three patients experienced recurrences and one experienced no symptom improvements. No patients in group A reported major or minor complications during or after corticosteroid injection, or required a compression bandage. All 15 patients in group B achieved complete resolution of articular impairment by 3 weeks after surgery, but ten patients were assigned to physiotherapy and local and/or oral analgesics for complete resolution of symptoms, which was approximately 30–40 days postsurgery. The mean duration of abstention from work and/or sport was 2–3 days in group A and 26 days in group B.

Conclusions: Although the limited sample size did not allow any statistical comparison between treatment groups, and therefore all the findings should be regarded as preliminary, the results of this explorative study suggest that ultrasound-guided injection of a corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid could be a safe and feasible approach for the treatment of trigger finger. It is also associated with a shorter recovery time than open surgery, which leads to a reduced abstention from sports and, in particular, work activities, and therefore may have some pharmacoeconomic implications, which may be further explored. In light of the promising results obtained in this investigation, further studies comparing ultrasound-guided injection of corticosteroid plus hyaluronic acid with corticosteroid alone are recommended in order to clarify the actual benefits attributable to hyaluronic acid.

Sonographically guided intrasheath percutaneous release of the first annular pulley for trigger digits, part 1: clinical efficacy and safety

OBJECTIVES

For trigger digits, intrasheath sonographically guided first annular (A1) pulley release has shown safety and effectiveness in cadavers. This clinical study describes sonographically guided A1 pulley release results in terms of resolution of symptoms, safety, and functional recovery.

METHODS

Sonographically guided A1 pulley release (11-MHz probe) was used in 48 digits of 48 patients prospectively followed for 11.3 months and examined 1, 3, and 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 year later. Resolution of triggering (primary variable of interest) was expressed as the "success rate" per digit. The time for taking postoperative pain killers, range of motion recovery, grip strength, QuickDASH test scores, return to normal activities (including work), cosmetic results, satisfaction, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

The success rate was 100%, and no cases recurred. Mean times were 1.9 days for taking pain killers, 6.6 days for returning to normal activities, and 9.9 and 3.8 days for complete extension and flexion recovery, respectively. Mean QuickDASH scores were 39.8 preoperatively and 7.8, 1.7, and 0 after 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Grip strength reached greater than 90% of the individual's normal strength by the sixth week in men and by the third month in women (P < .001). Radial digital nerve numbness developed in 1 finger, which disappeared by the third week. No other complications were noted. All wounds were cosmetically excellent, and final satisfaction was excellent or good in 98%.

CONCLUSIONS

With adequate anatomic knowledge, technical training, and a basic ultrasound machine, sonographically guided A1 pulley release can be performed safely and successfully, offering an alternative to classic open surgery in the ambulatory setting.

Conservative treatment of pediatric trigger thumb: follow-up for over 4 years

We analyzed the outcomes of our conservative treatment for pediatric trigger thumb. Since March 2004, we have used conservative treatment for all patients with pediatric trigger thumb. We prospectively analyzed 30 patients in whom 35 thumbs were affected (10 right, 15 left, 5 bilateral). The mean age at diagnosis was 28 (11-50) months. The treatment consisted of passive exercises performed by the children's mothers, 10-20 times daily. How reliably this was performed is unproven. Trigger thumb severity was graded as 0A (extension beyond 0°), 0B (extension to 0°), 1 (active extension with triggering), 2 (passive extension with triggering), and 3 (cannot extend either actively or passively i.e. locked). At diagnosis, six of the 35 thumbs (17%) were grade 1, 25 (71%) were grade 2, and four (11%) were grade 3. After a mean follow-up period of 63 (range, 49-73) months, 28 thumbs (80%) were grade 0A or 0B, 5 (14%) were grade 1 and 2 (6%) were grade 2. The bilateral cases and the patients who initially had grade 3 severity had significantly more unfavorable results than the other patients. This study suggests that conservative treatment for pediatric trigger thumb is a successful method, although cases that present with bilateral involvement or locking (grade 3) should be considered for early surgical release.

NEUROMA OF THE RADIAL DIGITAL NERVE OF THE MIDDLE FINGER FOLLOWING TRIGGER RELEASE

Trigger digit release is a common surgical procedure with a low complication rate. One of the potential complications is digital nerve injury. Though uncommon, digital nerve injury can be significantly symptomatic to the patient. We report a case of radial digital nerve neuroma formation following trigger release of the middle finger, which is considered to be safe, in terms of risk of digital nerve injury. We discuss our management of the complication, possible pitfalls which may have resulted in the complication in our case and offer possible means of overcoming these pitfalls.

A COMPARISON OF ENDOSCOPIC AND OPEN TRIGGER FINGER RELEASE

The main complaint of the patients after an open trigger finger release is a discomfort at the incision site. In this prospective study, we compared the two consecutive groups of patients with trigger fingers. One was treated by an open approach and the other by the endoscopic release of the A1 pulley. Pre- and post-operative evaluation at seven, 30 and 90 days showed a faster recovery from the discomfort with a faster return to daily and working activities, after the endoscopic procedure.