A survey of client experiences with orthotics using the QUEST 2.0

Treatment of trigger finger with metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis vs relative motion extension orthosis: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis (MCPJ-BO) is one of the first-line orthotic treatment for patients with trigger finger (TF). Relative motion extension orthosis (RME-O) has recently emerged as a treatment option for various hand disorders involving TF.

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 6 weeks of orthotic treatment with the MCPJ-BO and the RME-O for pain relief. Function and satisfaction with the orthosis were assessed as secondary objectives.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized clinical study.

METHODS

Thirty patients with an average age of 50 years with Froimson stage 1-3 A1 pulley triggering participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the MCPJ-BO (n = 15; 10 females, five males) or the RME-O group (n = 15; 12 females, three males). The orthoses were worn full time for 6 weeks. All patients received patient education, activity modification, and flexor tendon gliding exercises as part of the rehabilitation program. Pre- and post-assessments included Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire. The Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to analyze the difference between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in pain and function before treatment (p < 0.05). Within-group comparisons indicated that both orthoses relieved pain, but the MCPJ-BO group achieved greater pain relief (p = 0.001). There was a significant improvement in function in the MCPJ-BO group, with a mean change of 12.7 (p = 0.0001). The overall success rates for the MCPJ-BO group and RME-O group were 60% and 27%, respectively. Patients in both groups had high satisfaction with the orthosis.

CONCLUSIONS

MCPJ-BO and RME-O could be used for pain relief in the treatment of TF. The MCPJ-BO appears to be more effective than the RME-O in improving function.

Satisfaction survey toward an innovative orthosis for children with cerebral palsy with pes planovalgus

BACKGROUND

Pes planovalgus (PPV) is common in children with cerebral palsy and can cause pain and gait alterations over time. Initial treatment of flexible PPV includes orthotics, despite a lack of consensus on the type of orthosis. We developed an innovative ankle-foot orthosis (RAFO). RAFO is a one-piece orthosis designed to correct both the valgus and the flat of the foot. Its conception situated above the malleolar enables a moderate anti equinus effect. Its precise description and fabrication's process is detailed.

OBJECTIVES

We wanted to assess user's satisfaction after several months of use and looked for clinical criteria of satisfaction.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective.

METHODS

We conducted a satisfaction study through a telephonic QUEST (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology) survey analysing the device and the process in children and parents. 24 parents were contacted, whose child was wearing RAFO on a daily basis for at least 4 months. 20 parents answered the questionnaire. The results were then related to clinical data to research satisfaction' criteria.

RESULTS

Mean QUEST satisfaction was 4.25/5 (4.18/5 for device and 4.38/5 for process). Advantages reported concerned weight and dimensions (95%), although 20% reported the necessity to change to a shoe size above, ease of use (90%) and level of comfort (80%). Parent's satisfaction regarding perceived effectiveness was 80%. Children with equinus due to triceps surae spasticity were more susceptible to develop pain with our orthosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents were overall very satisfied with the orthosis. Its technical characteristics allowing both to be a corrector of flat foot and valgus and at the same time to be comfortable and discreet makes it innovative. The presence of spastic equinus is a limit for its utilization.

Three-dimensional printed customized versus conventional plaster brace for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled crossover trial

We investigated the non-operative management of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis with a three-dimensional (3-D) printed patient-customized brace compared with a conventional plaster brace. Fifty-two patients with symptomatic trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis were enrolled in a 9-week crossover study, which was designed as a randomized controlled trial of two periods of 4-week brace therapies. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction measured with the Dutch version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire survey. Secondary outcomes included pain, patient-reported function, functional hand strength measured by pinch and grip strength, and compliance assessed through a daily log of self-reported brace usage. The 3-D printed patient-customized brace had higher patient satisfaction and compliance than the conventional plaster brace. Patients preferred the 3-D printed customized brace (93%) rather than the conventional plaster brace (7%). This suggests that the 3-D printed patient-customized brace is effective in the non-operative management of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.Level of evidence: I.

Comparative Effectiveness of Sacroiliac Belt versus Lumbar Orthosis Utilization on Nonspecific Low Back Pain: a Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Back braces are commonly utilized in the management of low back pain (LBP).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate (1) user satisfaction with a sacroiliac belt versus a lumbar orthosis and (2) the effect of a sacroiliac belt versus a lumbar orthosis on pain, functional disability status, and analgesic use for subjects with subacute or chronic non-specific LBP.

METHODS

This is a prospective randomized crossover study. For the two-week study period, control group subjects wore the Horizon 627 Lumbar Brace ("lumbar orthosis") during the first week and the Serola Sacroiliac Belt ("sacroiliac belt") during the second week; experimental group subjects wore the sacroiliac belt during the first week and the lumbar orthosis during the second week. User satisfaction (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 [QUEST 2.0] score), functional disability status (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), pain, and analgesic use were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, the sacroiliac belt demonstrated significantly higher user satisfaction than the Horizon brace (QUEST Score = 20.31 vs. 16.17, p = 0.0375) for the entire study period. Significant negative correlations were identified between user satisfaction and functional disability (t = -4.71, p < 0.0001), pain magnitude (t = -6.81, p < 0.0001) as well as pain frequency (t = -6.66, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In this prospective randomized crossover study, subject satisfaction was associated with improvements in functional disability, pain magnitude and pain frequency. The sacroiliac belt demonstrated significantly higher user satisfaction and similar effectiveness compared to the lumbar orthosis.

Evaluation of User's Satisfaction With Orthotic and Prosthetic Devices and Services in Orthotics and Prosthetics Center of Iran University of Medical Sciences

BACKGROUND

The number of patients receiving orthotics and prosthetic services is increasing globally. A way to investigate patients' insight about services provided to them is to evaluate their satisfaction with the received services. Furthermore, incorporating patients' preferences into practice is an inseparable part of evidence-based practice. Applying such information in practice can contribute to the enhancement of the quality of services, the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions, and finally, the economic growth of service centers.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate patients' satisfaction with the orthotic and prosthetic devices and services provided by the orthotics and prosthetics clinic of Iran University of Medical Sciences.

METHODOLOGY

In this study, 173 people referring to the orthotics and prosthetics clinic of Iran University of Medical Sciences were recruited, and their satisfaction level was examined using the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey questionnaire (OPUS) through a phone interview.

FINDINGS

Concerning the devices, the mean value of total satisfaction score was 74:00±19.80 and the highest score belonged to no wear or rupture of the clothes with their devices (mean value = 4.76±0.84). In terms of services, the mean value of total satisfaction score was 72.12 ± 15.90 with the highest score belonging to the politeness of the clinic staff (mean value = 4.92±0.57). When the time point from receiving service was taken into account, the patients who received the service for less than a year showed higher satisfaction level with the service (p=0.024). Although satisfaction with the device was slightly higher among the participants who used the devices for more than a year, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of device satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall satisfaction level from the devices and services was relatively high. However, the satisfaction level with the costs and coordination of the staff with the physicians showed a decline.

Factors affecting orthosis adherence after acute traumatic hand tendon repairs: A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Custom-made orthoses are used to prevent contractures and reinjury of tissues such as tendon rupture after traumatic tendon repairs. Despite their wide usage in hand rehabilitation, orthosis adherence is usually an overlooked problem.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This study aims to evaluate the possible factors affecting the orthosis adherence in patients with acute traumatic tendon repairs.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Two hundred twelve patients with acute traumatic hand tendon repair were included in this prospective cohort study. Patients were evaluated on the third day postoperatively and at three weeks. All patients were told to wear their orthosis 24 h a day for three weeks and allowed to take it off to wash the hand carefully once a day. Adherence was measured as fully adherent, partially adherent, and nonadherent. Factors that may affect orthosis adherence were evaluated according to the five dimensions of the multidimensional adherence model including socioeconomic, condition-related, treatment-related, patient-related, and health-care system-related factors. The Modified Hand Injury Severity Scale was used to assess the severity of the injury. Depression and anxiety symptoms were evaluated with the Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed for orthosis adherence.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-three patients were analyzed. Forty-four (33.1%) patients were fully adherent with the prescribed orthosis, whereas 67 (50.4%) were partially adherent and 22 (16.5%) were nonadherent. Higher depression symptoms caused orthosis nonadherence [odds ratio = 1.2 (95% confidence interval = 1.1-1.3), P = .001] and partial adherence [odds ratio = 1.1 (95% confidence interval = 1.0-1.2), P = .01].

CONCLUSIONS

Among our patients with acute traumatic tendon repair, only one-third of the patients were fully adherent with the orthosis wear program. Depression in the very acute period of injury impaired orthosis adherence.

Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (A-QUEST 2.0) in prosthesis users

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of patient satisfaction and perceptions plays a vital role in determining the quality of prosthesis users' devices and the competency of healthcare services.

AIM

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Arabic Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (A-QUEST 2.0) with prosthetics users.

DESIGN

A methodological study.

SETTING

Saudi Arabia, Turkey.

POPULATION

A convenience sample of outpatient prosthesis users (N.=183).

METHODS

The A-QUEST 2.0 includes two subscales respectively evaluating the user's satisfaction with the device and the services provided. The data for each subscale were investigated using Rasch analysis to evaluate the item fit, reliability indices, item difficulty, local item dependency, and differential item functioning (DIF).

RESULTS

Both subscales met the Rasch criteria for the functioning of rating scale categories. All items showed an acceptable fit to the Rasch model. The person separation indices for the Device and Services subscales were 2.21 (Cronbach's α=0.90) and 1.72 (Cronbach's α=0.85), respectively. Therefore, the two subscales are sensitive enough to distinguish between at least three different levels of satisfaction. The unidimensionality of each subscale was confirmed, and none of the items displayed differential item functioning across age, gender, location of amputation, country, and duration of use.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the findings indicate the psychometric evaluation of A-QUEST 2.0 is effective with prosthesis users across different clinical contexts and cultures. Thus, the A-QUEST 2.0 allows for a comprehensive understanding of users' perceptions of prosthesis characteristics, particularly among subjects with lower limb amputations caused by traumatic injuries.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

Our paper provides clinicians dealing with Arabic patients a validated outcome measure for satisfaction with prosthesis. Besides providing information in the development of new products and service delivery. Further studies are necessary to improve the measure's metric quality in different contexts and for different prosthesis devices.

Utilization of 3D printed orthoses for musculoskeletal conditions of the upper extremity: A systematic review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: 3D printed orthoses are emerging as a possible option in the field of hand therapy to fabricate conventional casts and orthoses. It is unknown how this technology is currently being used to treat upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions, and if 3D orthoses are comparable to custom- made low temperature thermoplastic orthoses fabricated by hand therapists.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The primary aim of this review was to investigate the utilization, effectiveness and feasibility of 3D printed technology to manufacture custom orthoses for musculoskeletal conditions of the upper extremity.

METHODS

Studies describing 3D printed orthoses or casts used in treatment with patients were included following a comprehensive literature search using CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, ProQuest, and EBSCO databases. The selected studies had to address musculoskeletal conditions of the elbow, wrist, hand and/or digits that would typically be immobilized with a cast or brace or orthotic or orthosis.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Study designs included case studies, case series, and 1 randomized clinical trial. 3D printed orthoses/casts appear to be comfortable, provide adequate immobilization, and have pleasing aesthetics. However, expensive equipment, lack of appropriate software and scanning tools and lack of highly skilled clinicians are all factors preventing the implementation of 3D printed orthoses into current clinical practice.

DISCUSSION

3D printed orthoses appear to be effective at immobilization of a limb, aesthetically pleasing, and utilize lightweight and well -ventilated materials. However, the feasibility of implementing 3D printing technology in hand therapy settings remains challenging in part due to the resources required.

CONCLUSIONS

While 3D printing shows promise, the high cost of equipment, lack of training and skill of clinicians and the long time required for production are all factors that need to be improved to make 3D printing a viable option in the hand therapy setting.

Patient satisfaction with the CMC controller: A cohort study

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study.

INTRODUCTION

The evidence specific to understanding patient satisfaction, preference and the effects on occupational performance using a CMC orthosis is sparse.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The main purpose of this study was to determine patient satisfaction, aspects of the orthotic preference, and the effect on pain and function of the CMC Controller Plus neoprene orthotic device.

METHODS

This research was conducted at two outpatient clinics located in Pennsylvania and Florida during 2019. The subjects of this study included any individuals referred to one of two participating hand therapy facilities with either a primary or secondary diagnosis of thumb CMC joint arthritis or present with this diagnosis as a comorbidity. The CMC Controller Plus orthosis (Hely & Weber) was provided to each patient by the treating therapist at no cost to the patient after the patient agreed to take part in the study. None of the patients received hand therapy treatment for the CMC pain; the only intervention provided was the CMC Controller Plus.

RESULTS

The CMC Controller Plus orthosis improved the patients' functional status and reduced their pain. The effect size for the change in function was large (1.29) compared to the effect size for the reduction in pain which approached moderate at 0.49.

DISCUSSION

The CMC Controller Plus orthosis improved the patient's functional status by 52% and reduced their pain by 29%.

CONCLUSION

The results were both statistically and clinically significant.

Facilitators and Barriers to Wearing Hand Orthoses by Adults with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Mixed Methods Study Design

Background:

To retard shortening of finger flexors in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), hand orthoses are prescribed. However, many patients do not wear the orthoses regularly. To optimize orthotic interventions, we need insight into the factors influencing compliance.

Objective:

To evaluate the compliance regarding hand orthoses in an adult DMD population and to explore experiences and perceptions of DMD patients wearing orthoses, and of their caregivers.

Methods:

Mixed methods observational study, combining quantitative and qualitative data from medical charts combined with qualitative semi-structured interviews using a constant comparative method and a short validated questionnaire (D-QUEST).

Results:

65 medical charts were analyzed. 48 patients were assessed as needing hand orthoses, of whom 37.5 % were compliant. Qualitative data analyses revealed (1) motivation: preservation of hand function; (2) barriers: discomfort and impediments; (3) facilitators: good fit and personalized wearing schedule; (4) fitting process: satisfactory, but patients do not readily seek help when barriers appear.

Conclusions:

Patients are motivated to wear hand orthoses, but often discontinue use because of orthosis-and disease-specific barriers. The identification of these barriers leads to practical and feasible recommendations concerning the orthoses and the fitting process, such as less rigid material, preservation of some function while wearing the orthoses, and fixed evaluation points. The findings were confirmed by the D-QUEST.