In vitro neuraminidase inhibitory activity of four neuraminidase inhibitors against influenza virus isolates in the 2011-2012 season in Japan

Burden of influenza B virus infection and considerations for clinical management

Influenza B viruses cause significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in children, but the awareness of their impact is often less than influenza A viruses partly due to their lack of pandemic potential. Here, we summarise the biology, epidemiology and disease burden of influenza B, and review existing data on available antivirals for its management. There has long been uncertainty surrounding the clinical efficacy of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) for influenza B treatment. In this article, we bring together the existing data on NAIs and discuss these alongside recent large randomised controlled trial data for the new polymerase inhibitor baloxavir in high-risk influenza B patients. Finally, we offer considerations for the clinical management of influenza B, with a focus on children and high-risk patients where disease burden is highest.

Consecutive influenza surveillance of neuraminidase mutations and neuraminidase inhibitor resistance in Japan

Background

The large consumption of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) for the treatment of influenza virus infections places Japan at risk of becoming the epicenter of the global spread of NAI‐resistant viruses.

Objective

To clarify NA amino acid mutations of epidemic influenza viruses in Japan and their related NAI resistance.

Methods

A total of 1791 samples, including 396 A/H1N1pdm09, 1117 A/H3N2, and 278 B isolates, were collected to determine of their 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) values by NAIs (oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, and laninamivir) during the Japanese seasons from 2011‐2012 to 2016‐2017. Then, 380 samples including 49 A/H1N1pdm09, 251 A/H3N2, and 80 B isolates were sequenced for the entire NA genes.

Results

Neuraminidase inhibitor‐resistant A/H1N1pdm09 viruses were detected at a frequency of 1.3% (5/396 isolates) in the epidemic seasons. None of the A/H3N2 and B viruses developed resistance to any of the four NAIs during the six seasons. Only five and 13 AA mutations were detected in the NA catalytic sites of A/H1N1pdm09 and A/H3N2 viruses, respectively. No mutations were observed in the catalytic sites of B viruses. Four of the five mutations in the catalytic sites of A/H1N1pdm09 consisted of H275Y, which was related to high resistance to oseltamivir and peramivir. Most (10/13) of the catalytic site mutations in A/H3N2 were associated with MDCK‐passaged induction (D151G/N). Finally, no mutations related to substantial NAI resistance were detected in the A/H3N2 and B viruses examined.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the NA catalytic sites of influenza viruses are well preserved. Even in Japan, no spread of NAI‐resistant viruses has been observed, and A/H1N1pdm09 viruses carrying H275Y remain limited.

In vitro neuraminidase inhibitory concentration (IC50) of four neuraminidase inhibitors in the Japanese 2016-17 season: Comparison with the 2010-11 to 2015-16 seasons

To assess the extent of susceptibility to the four most commonly used neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) in the viruses epidemic in the 2016-17 Japanese influenza season, we measured the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) of these NAIs for influenza virus isolates from patients and compared them with the results from the 2010-11 to 2015-16 seasons. Viral isolation was done with specimens obtained prior to treatment, and the type and subtype was determined by RT-PCR using type- and subtype-specific primers. The IC₅₀ was determined by a neuraminidase inhibition assay using a fluorescent substrate. A total of 276 virus isolates, 6 A (H1N1)pdm09 (2.2%), 249 A (H3N2) (90.2%), and 21 B (7.6%), had the IC₅₀ measured for the four NAIs. B isolates included 11 (52.4%), 9 (42.9%), and one (4.8%) of the Victoria, Yamagata, and undetermined strains, respectively. No A (H1N1)pdm09 with highly reduced sensitivity for oseltamivir was found in the 2016-17 season. No isolate with highly reduced sensitivity to the four NAIs have been found for A (H3N2) or B from the 2010-11 to 2016-17 seasons. No significant trend of increase or decrease was found in the geometric mean IC₅₀s of the four NAIs during the seven studied seasons. These results indicate that the sensitivity to the four commonly used NAIs has been maintained and that any change in the effectiveness of these NAIs would be minute. Common usage of NAIs for patient treatment has not been a driving force in the selection of NAI resistant viruses.

[A preliminary study on the disappearance time of influenza virus antigen]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the antigen clearance time, time to symptom disappearance, and the association between them using immunofluorescence assay for dynamic monitoring of influenza virus antigen in children with influenza.

METHODS

A total of 1 063 children suspected of influenza who visited the Hunan People's Hospital from March to April, 2016 were enrolled. The influenza A/B virus antigen detection kit (immunofluorescence assay) was used for influenza virus antigen detection. The children with positive results were given oseltamivir as the antiviral therapy and were asked to re-examine influenza virus antigen at 5, 5-7, and 7 days after onset.

RESULTS

Of all children suspected of influenza, 560 (52.68%) had an influenza virus infection. A total of 215 children with influenza virus infection were followed up. The clearance rate of influenza virus antigen was 9.8% (21 cases) within 5 days after onset. The cumulative clearance rate of influenza virus antigen was 32.1% (69 cases) within 5-7 days, and 98.1% (211 cases) within 7-10 days after onset. Among these children, 6 children (2.8%) achieved the improvement in clinical symptoms within 3 days after onset. The cumulative rate of symptom improvement was 84.7% (182 cases) within 3-5 days after onset, and 100% achieved the improvement after 5 days of onset.

CONCLUSIONS

The time to improvement in symptoms after treatment is earlier than antigen clearance time. Almost all of the children achieve influenza virus antigen clearance 7-10 days after onset. Therefore, it is relatively safe for children to go back to school within 7-10 days after onset when symptoms disappear.

Effect of seasonal vaccination on the selection of influenza A/H3N2 epidemic variants

The effect of vaccination on the dynamics of influenza virus variants remains largely unknown in humans, unlike in poultry. In this study, we compared influenza hemagglutinin (HA) gene sequences isolated from vaccinated and unvaccinated populations with the yearly vaccine strains. In total, 181 influenza A/H3N2 virus samples isolated from 82 vaccinated and 99 unvaccinated patients (2011-15, four Japanese influenza seasons) were genetically analyzed using a next-generation sequencer. Amino acid (AA) differences from corresponding vaccine strains were found in 74 of 329 HA1 sites. There was a maximum of four AA differences within the epitopes in the former three seasons (2011-14) and fifteen in the latter season (2014-15). Deviation to a greater number of AA differences was found more significantly in the isolates from vaccinated patients as compared to unvaccinated patients (P=0.0005 in 2011-14; P=0.0096 in 2014-15). AA difference rates within epitopes were also significantly higher in the isolates from vaccinated patients than from unvaccinated patients (2.64% vs. 2.14% for 2011-14, P=0.033; 7.78% vs. 6.59% for 2014-15, P=0.058). The AA differences at seven sites (48I-278K, 128A-142G, 145S, 158K, and 193S) became dominant in the following seasons. In all of these sites, the dominance was retained during the mismatch of isolates with the vaccine strains and was lost after vaccine match. Our data suggest that in humans, immune pressure induced by vaccination works to select influenza variants genetically distant from vaccine strains.

Long-acting Neuraminidase Inhibitor Laninamivir Octanoate as Post-exposure Prophylaxis for Influenza

BACKGROUND

A single administration of laninamivir octanoate, a long-acting neuraminidase inhibitor, has been proven to be effective in the treatment of influenza but not for post-exposure prophylaxis.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study to determine if a single administration of laninamivir octanoate 40 mg was superior to placebo for post-exposure prophylaxis. Eligible participants who had cohabited with an influenza patient within 48 hours of symptom onset were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 1 of 3 groups: 40 mg of laninamivir octanoate single administration (LO-40SD), 20 mg of laninamivir octanoate once daily for 2 days (LO-20TD), or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who developed clinical influenza (defined as influenza virus positive, an axillary temperature >37.5°C, and at least 2 symptoms) over a 10-day period.

RESULTS

A total of 803 participants were enrolled, with 801 included in the primary analysis. The proportions of participants with clinical influenza were 4.5% (12/267), 4.5% (13/269), and 12.1% (32/265) in the LO-40SD, LO-20TD, and placebo groups, respectively. A single administration of laninamivir octanoate 40 mg significantly reduced the development of influenza compared with placebo (P = .001). The relative risk reductions compared with the placebo group were 62.8% and 63.1% for the LO-40SD and LO-20TD groups, respectively. The incidence of adverse events in the LO-40SD group was similar to that of the LO-20TD and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A single administration of laninamivir octanoate was effective and well tolerated as post-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the development of influenza.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

JapicCTI-142679.

Drug-Resistant and Genetic Evolutionary Analysis of Influenza Virus from Patients During the 2013 and 2014 Influenza Season in Beijing

The study aimed to analyze drug resistance and mutations and genetic evolution of influenza A and influenza B viruses during the 2013 and 2014 influenza season in Beijing, China. RNA was extracted from pharyngeal or nasal swabs of 28 patients, and determination of influenza genotypes was performed by using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Influenza A virus samples were sequenced with the neuraminidase (NA) gene and M2 matrix protein gene to determine the NA inhibitor (NAI) resistance and amantadine resistance mutations, and influenza B virus samples were sequenced with the NA gene and hemagglutinin (HA) gene to analyze NAI resistance mutations. As a result, the enrolled subjects consisted of 19 patients with the A(H1N1)pdm09 subtype, four with A(H3N2) subtype and five with influenza B virus. All of the 23 samples with influenza A viruses harbored amantadine resistance mutation S31N in M2 matrix protein. V241I, a compensatory NAI resistance mutation, was detected in all of the 19 A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses. No other NAI resistance mutation was observed in both influenza A and B viruses. The NA gene of the five influenza B virus strains was classified as B-Victoria lineage, while the HA gene of five strains was classified as B-Yamagata lineage. In summary, all influenza A viruses from patients in Beijing in the 2013-2014 season were resistant to amantadine agent. Both influenza A and B viruses kept sensitive to NAIs. Lineage recombination was detected in influenza B virus strains and may impair the efficacy of influenza vaccination.

Peramivir: A Novel Intravenous Neuraminidase Inhibitor for Treatment of Acute Influenza Infections

Peramivir is a novel cyclopentane neuraminidase inhibitor of influenza virus. It was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in December 2014 for treatment of acute uncomplicated influenza in patients 18 years and older. For several months prior to approval, the drug was made clinically available under Emergency Use authorization during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Peramivir is highly effective against human influenza A and B isolates as well as emerging influenza virus strains with pandemic potential. Clinical trials demonstrated that the drug is well-tolerated in adult and pediatric populations. Adverse events are generally mild to moderate and similar in frequency to patients receiving placebo. Common side effects include gastrointestinal disorders and decreased neutrophil counts but are self-limiting. Peramivir is administered as a single-dose via the intravenous route providing a valuable therapeutic alternative for critically ill patients or those unable to tolerate other administration routes. Successful clinical trials and post-marketing data in pediatric populations in Japan support the safety and efficacy of peramivir in this population where administration of other antivirals might not be feasible.

Clinical outcome of laninamivir octanoate hydrate for influenza in the 2013-2014 Japanese season

The clinical outcome of laninamivir octanoate hydrate (laninamivir) in the Japanese 2013-2014 influenza season was investigated. A total of 235 patients were enrolled, of whom 222 were evaluated for the duration of fever and other symptoms. The types/subtypes were 101 A(H1N1)pdm09 (45.5%), 37 A(H3N2) (16.7%), and 84 B (37.8%). The median durations of fever were 32.0, 41.0, and 50.0 h, and the median durations of symptoms were 74.5, 85.0, and 95.0 h for A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), and B, respectively. The differences among the three groups were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the duration of fever or symptoms between patients under 10 and 10 years or over. The median durations of fever were 46.0 and 58.0 h and the median durations of symptoms were 95.0 and 77.0 h for the Yamagata and Victoria lineages, respectively. The virus positive rates at day 5 were significantly different at 31.5% (28/89), 12.1% (4/33), and 34.7% (26/75) for the three type/subtypes, respectively. The virus positive rates for A(H1N1)pdm09 and B were significantly higher for the patients under 10 years than for the patients 10 years or older. (p = 0.0379 and 0.0320, respectively). No significant increase was found between the IC(50) of days 1 and 5. No adverse drug reactions associated with laninamivir were reported. These results indicate the continuing clinical utility of laninamivir against influenza, irrespective of the virus type/subtype or lineage, and that it is unlikely that the clinical use of laninamivir will lead to selection of resistant virus.

Continued effectiveness of laninamivir octanate hydrate for influenza treatment in Japan: comparison between the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 influenza seasons

The clinical effectiveness of Laninamivir octanoate hydrate (laninamivir) was investigated in the Japanese 2012-2013 influenza season for comparison with that of the Japanese 2011-2012 influenza season. A total of 235 patients were enrolled, of whom 210 were evaluated for the duration of fever and other symptoms. The median durations of fever for A(H3N2) were 32.0 and 38.0 h and the median durations of symptoms for the A(H3N2) were 102.0 and 84.0 h for patients aged under 10 and 10 years or older, respectively. All four influenza B patients were 10 years or older, and their median duration of fever was 43.0 h and the median duration of symptoms was 71.0 h. There was no significant difference in the duration of fever or symptoms between the two seasons. The rates of patients A(H3N2) virus positive at day 5 were 37.2% (16/43) and 12.8% (18/141) for those aged under 10 years and 10 years or older, respectively. The virus positive rate was significantly higher for the patients under 10 years than for the patients aged 10 years or older (p < 0.0001). No significant change in IC50 value was found between days 1 and 5. Adverse drug reactions were reported by 2 of the 231 patients (0.87%), but neither was serious. These results suggest that laninamivir continued to be effective against influenza A(H3N2) with no safety issues and that it is unlikely that the clinical use of laninamivir will lead to virus resistance.

Determining drug efficacy parameters for mathematical models of influenza

Antivirals are the first line of defence against influenza, so drug efficacy should be re-evaluated for each new strain. However, due to the time and expense involved in assessing the efficacy of drug treatments both in vitro and in vivo, treatment regimens are largely not re-evaluated even when strains are found to be resistant to antivirals. Mathematical models of the infection process can help in this assessment, but for accurate model predictions, we need to measure model parameters characterizing the efficacy of antivirals. We use computer simulations to explore whether in vitro experiments can be used to extract drug efficacy parameters for use in viral kinetics models. We find that the efficacy of neuraminidase inhibitors can be determined by measuring viral load during a single cycle assay, while the efficacy of adamantanes can be determined by measuring infected cells during the preparation stage for the single cycle assay.

In vitro neuraminidase inhibitory activity of four neuraminidase inhibitors against clinical isolates of the influenza virus circulating in the Japanese 2013-2014 season

To assess the extent of viral resistance, we measured the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) for the influenza virus isolates in the 2013-2014 influenza season and compared the results to those of the 2010-2011 to 2012-2013 influenza seasons. Viral isolation was done with specimens obtained prior to treatment, and the type and subtype of influenza was determined by RT-PCR using type- and subtype-specific primers. The IC50 was determined by a neuraminidase inhibition assay using a fluorescent substrate. A total of 327 influenza viruses were isolated: 172 influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (52.6%), 49 A(H3N2) (15.0%), and 106 B (32.4%). Numbers of Victoria and Yamagata lineage isolates were 36 and 70, respectively. Two A(H1N1)pdm09 isolates showed a high IC50 for oseltamivir (130 and 150 nM) exceeding by 100 times the geometric mean of the IC50 of oseltamivir for A(H1N1)pdm09 isolates (0.76 nM). No isolate showed a very high IC50 for A(H3N2) or B. The IC50 of the NAIs except for oseltamivir for A(H1N1) pdm09 were significantly higher than those of the 2010-2011 season (P < 0.05). The IC50 of all four NAIs for A(H3N2) were significantly lower than those of the 2012-2013 season (P < 0.001). The IC50 of the NAIs for B except for oseltamivir were significantly lower than those of the 2012-2013 season (P < 0.001). Although there are some isolates that show highly reduced sensitivity to oseltamivir among A(H1N1)pdm09 isolates, the currently epidemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2) and B viruses are susceptible to all four NAIs with no trend toward decreased sensitivity.

In vitro neuraminidase inhibitory activity of four neuraminidase inhibitors against clinical isolates of influenza virus in the Japanese 2012-2013 season

The neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) oseltamivir phosphate (Tamiflu(®)), zanamivir (Relenza(®)), laninamivir octanoate (Inavir(®)), and peramivir (Rapiacta(®)) have been available for the treatment of influenza in Japan since 2010. The emergence of resistant virus to any of the NAIs is a great concern for influenza treatment. To assess the extent of viral resistance, we measured the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of each NAI for influenza virus isolates in the 2012-2013 influenza season and compared the results to those of the 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 influenza seasons. Viral isolation of specimens obtained prior to treatment was done using Madine-Darby canine kidney cells, and the type and subtype of influenza, A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), or influenza B, was determined by RT-PCR using type- and subtype-specific primers. The IC50 was determined by a neuraminidase inhibition assay using a fluorescent substrate. A total of 329 influenza viruses were isolated:5 influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (1.5%), 316 influenza A(H3N2) (96.1%), and 8 influenza B (2.4%). No isolate showed an IC50 value exceeding 50 nM for any of the neuraminidase inhibitors. The IC50 values for A(H3N2) and B were similar to those of the 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 seasons. No isolate showed an increased IC50 value for A(H1N1)pdm09. These results indicate that the currently epidemic influenza viruses are susceptible to all four neuraminidase inhibitors, with no trend for IC50 values to increase at present.