Clinical evaluation of QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus directly compared with QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube and T-Spot®.TB for active pulmonary tuberculosis in the elderly

The Impact of Immune System Aging on Infectious Diseases

Immune system aging is becoming a field of increasing public health interest because of prolonged life expectancy, which is not paralleled by an increase in health expectancy. As age progresses, innate and adaptive immune systems undergo changes, which are defined, respectively, as inflammaging and immune senescence. A wealth of available data demonstrates that these two conditions are closely linked, leading to a greater vulnerability of elderly subjects to viral, bacterial, and opportunistic infections as well as lower post-vaccination protection. To face this novel scenario, an in-depth assessment of the immune players involved in this changing epidemiology is demanded regarding the individual and concerted involvement of immune cells and mediators within endogenous and exogenous factors and co-morbidities. This review provides an overall updated description of the changes affecting the aging immune system, which may be of help in understanding the underlying mechanisms associated with the main age-associated infectious diseases.

Comparison of interferon-gamma production between TB1 and TB2 tubes of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

CD8 T-cells play an important role in interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production as a host defense against tuberculosis (TB) infection. Therefore, QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) was developed by adding a TB2 tube beside the TB1 tube. This study aimed to compare and analyze the difference in IFN-γ production between the two tubes in general and specific populations.

CONTENT

PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO were searched for studies reporting IFN-γ production levels in the TB1 and TB2 tubes. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.

SUMMARY

A total of 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. The IFN-γ production in the TB2 tube was statistically higher than that in the TB1 tube (mean difference (MD)=0.02, 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI): 0.01-0.03). Further subgroup analysis in specific populations revealed that the MD of IFN-γ production between the TB2 and TB1 tubes was significantly higher in active TB subjects than in latent TB infection (LTBI) subjects (MD=1.13, 95 % CI: 0.49-1.77, and MD=0.30, 95 % CI: 0.00-0.60, respectively). A similar finding was found in immune-mediated inflammatory disease subjects, but not statistically significant. Interestingly, IFN-γ production capacity was lower in active TB subjects than in LTBI subjects in each of the TB1 and TB2 tubes.

OUTLOOK

This study is the first to systematically compare IFN-γ production between the TB1 and TB2 tubes. The IFN-γ production was higher in the TB2 tube than in the TB1 tube, representing the host's CD8 T-cell response magnitude to TB infection.

Exploration and improvement of QuantiFERON-TB assay in patients with indeterminate results in clinical practice: A head-to-head study

BACKGROUND

We implemented the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) based on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (QFT-PBMCs) and QFT Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) in patients with indeterminate results, and use Mit-Nil value to identify false negatives and impaired cellular immunity.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-one out of 2480 patients who had a QFT-GIT test were prospectively recruited and classified as high Nil (n = 35), low Mit (n = 75) and control (n = 61) cohorts. Head-to-head comparisons, i.e., QFT-PBMCs vs. QFT-GIT in high Nil cohort, QFT-Plus vs. QFT-GIT in low Mit cohort, and QFT-PBMCs vs. QFT-GIT in controls, were performed. Lymphocyte subsets counts were conducted in low Mit and control cohorts.

RESULTS

A significant reduction of positive rate only occurred in Mit-Nil < 6 IU/ml (p < 0.001). QFT-PBMCs yielded 100 % valid results and had a significant Nil decline in high Nil cohort (0.98 ± 1.06 vs. 9.55 ± 0.64 IU/ml, p < 0.0001), while correlated well with QFT-GIT for qualitative (Cohen's k = 0.93) and quantitative (TB-Ag [R2 = 0.91] and Mit [R2 = 0.94]) analyses. QFT-Plus produced 61.3 % valid results and had a significant Mit increase in low Mit cohort (0.82 ± 0.95 vs. 0.17 ± 0.11 IU/ml, p < 0.0001). Mit-Nil value significantly correlated with lymphocyte subsets counts (R:0.49-0.56, p < 0.0001), separately corresponding to thresholds of 4.26, 5.33, 5.55 and 5.81 IU/ml for predicting decreased total lymphocyte, T lymphocyte, CD4+ and CD8+ cells.

CONCLUSIONS

QFT that replacing whole blood with PBMCs should be recommended to handle high Nil samples, and QFT-Plus can declined the frequency of low Mit results. In addition, Mit-Nil < 6 and 5.81 IU/ml are potential thresholds to identify the risk of false negatives and impaired cellular immunity, respectively.

Current status and future landscape of diagnosing tuberculosis infection

Interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs), such as QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT) or T-SPOT.TB, are frequently used as tools for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) infection in the 21st century. QFT-Plus recently emerged as the fourth generation of QFT assays and has replaced QFT In-Tube. However, IGRAs have several problems regarding the identification of active, latent, and cured TB infection, and the time-consuming diagnosis of TB infection because of the overnight incubation of clinical specimens or complexity of measuring the level of interferon (IFN)-γ. To easily diagnose TB infection and quickly compare it with conventional IGRAs, many in vitro tests are developed based on assays other than enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or enzyme-linked immunospot, such as the fluorescent lateral flow assay that requires less manual operation and a shorter time. Simplified versions of IGRAs are emerging, including QIAreach QuantiFERON-TB. On the other hand, to distinguish active TB from latent or cured TB infection, new immunodiagnostic biomarkers beyond IFN-γ are evaluated using QFT supernatants. While IFN-γ or IFN-γ-related chemokine such as IFN-γ induced protein 10 is a potential biomarker in patients with active TB, interleukin-2 or latency-associated antigen such as heparin-binding hemagglutinin may be useful to distinguish active TB from latent or cured TB infection. There are no potential biomarkers to fully distinguish the time-phase of TB infection at present. It is necessary to discover new immunodiagnostic biomarkers to facilitate decisions on treatment selection for active or latent TB infection.

Tuberculosis in older adults: challenges and best practices in the Western Pacific Region

The Western Pacific has one of the fastest-growing older adult populations globally, and tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the foremost infectious causes of disease and death in the region. Older adults are at higher risk of TB due to immunosenescence, comorbidities, and increased institutionalisation. Atypical symptoms and reduced access to health services may delay care-seeking and TB diagnosis, while co-morbidity and increased risk of adverse drug reactions complicate TB treatment. Post-TB sequelae and socioeconomic challenges may decrease the quality of life after TB treatment completion. Despite their high disease burden and special challenges, there is a lack of regionally coordinated policies and guidelines to manage TB among older adults. Routine TB screening at aged-care facilities, age-friendly infrastructure and services, awareness of atypical TB features, integration of TB and non-communicable diseases services, and person-centred approaches to treatment support could improve TB management among older adults. Addressing these challenges and adopting the best practices identified should inform policy formulation and implementation.

Funding

This project was funded by 1) the World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, with financial contributions from the Government of the Republic of Korea through the Korean Disease Control and Prevention Agency and the Government of Japan through the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and 2) NUS Start-up Grant. The funders had no role in the paper design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing of the paper.

Screening for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

Importance

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) can progress to active tuberculosis disease, causing morbidity and mortality.

Objective

To review the evidence on benefits and harms of screening for and treatment of LTBI in adults to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).

Data Sources

PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and trial registries through December 3, 2021; references; experts; literature surveillance through January 20, 2023.

Study Selection

English-language studies of LTBI screening, LTBI treatment, or accuracy of the tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs). Studies of LTBI screening and treatment for public health surveillance or disease management were excluded.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Dual review of abstracts, full-text articles, and study quality; qualitative synthesis of findings; meta-analyses conducted when a sufficient number of similar studies were available.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Screening test accuracy; development of active tuberculosis disease, transmission, quality of life, mortality, and harms.

Results

A total of 113 publications were included (112 studies; N = 69 009). No studies directly evaluated the benefits and harms of screening. Pooled estimates for sensitivity of the TST were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74-0.87) at the 5-mm induration threshold, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.87) at the 10-mm threshold, and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.46-0.74) at the 15-mm threshold. Pooled estimates for sensitivity of IGRA tests ranged from 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79-0.84) to 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92). Pooled estimates for specificity of screening tests ranged from 0.95 to 0.99. For treatment of LTBI, a large (n = 27 830), good-quality randomized clinical trial found a relative risk (RR) for progression to active tuberculosis at 5 years of 0.35 (95% CI, 0.24-0.52) for 24 weeks of isoniazid compared with placebo (number needed to treat, 112) and an increase in hepatotoxicity (RR, 4.59 [95% CI, 2.03-10.39]; number needed to harm, 279). A previously published meta-analysis reported that multiple regimens were efficacious compared with placebo or no treatment. Meta-analysis found greater risk for hepatotoxicity with isoniazid than with rifampin (pooled RR, 4.22 [95% CI, 2.21-8.06]; n = 7339).

Conclusions and Relevance

No studies directly evaluated the benefits and harms of screening for LTBI compared with no screening. TST and IGRAs were moderately sensitive and highly specific. Treatment of LTBI with recommended regimens reduced the risk of progression to active tuberculosis. Isoniazid was associated with higher rates of hepatotoxicity than placebo or rifampin.

Comparing the diagnostic performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus with QFT-GIT, T-SPOT.TB and TST: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is an important test that has emerged in recent years for detecting TB infection. We conducted a review to compare the sensitivity, specificity and positive rate of QFT-Plus with that of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT), T-cell spot of tuberculosis assay (T-SPOT.TB) and Tuberculin test (TST).

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched, without language restrictions, from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2022 using "Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infections" and "QuantiFERON-TB-Plus" as search phrases. We estimated the sensitivity from studies of patients with active tuberculosis, specificity from studies of populations with very low risk of TB exposure, and positive rate from studies of high-risk populations. The methodological quality of the eligible studies was assessed, and a random-effects model meta-analysis was used to determine the risk difference (RD). We assessed the pooled rate by using a random-effects model. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD 42021267432).

RESULTS

Of 3996 studies, 83 were eligible for full-text screening and 41 were included in the meta-analysis. In patients with active TB, the sensitivity of QFT-Plus was compared to that of QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB, respectively, and no statistically differences were found. In populations with a very low risk of TB exposure, the specificity of QFT-Plus was compared with that of QFT-GTI and T-SPOT.TB, respectively, and no statistically differences were found. Two studies were eligible to compare the specificity of the QFT-Plus test with that of the TST test, and the pooled RD was 0.12 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.22). In high-risk populations, 18 studies were eligible to compare the positive rate of the QFT-Plus test with that of the QFT-GIT test, and the pooled RD was 0.02 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.03). The positive rate of QFT-Plus was compared with that of T-SPOT.TB and TST groups, and no statistically differences were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of QFT-Plus was similar to that of QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB, but was slightly more specific than TST.

Practices and attitudes towards tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection screening in people living with HIV/AIDS among HIV physicians in Japan

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be the leading cause of death for people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHIV), and HIV is the strongest known risk factor for progression to active TB disease for persons with latent TB infection (LTBI). Screening for active TB and LTBI, and TB preventive therapy (TPT) is recommended, however, clinical practices regarding LTBI screening for HIV positive population have not been uniform, resulting in low rates of LTBI screening and TPT uptake, in both low and high TB-burden countries. We sought to explore the practices and attitudes towards TB and LTBI screening in PLHIV among HIV physicians in Japan.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey whereby an on-line questionnaire was administered to physicians who are currently, or have the experience of, providing care and treatment for PLHIV in Japan.

Results

The questionnaire was sent to a total of 83 physicians, of which 59 responded (response rate; 71.1%). 52.5% (31/59) conducted routine screening and 44.0% (26/59) conducted selectively screening for active TB among HIV/AIDS patients. As for LTBI, 54.2% (32/59) conducted routine screening and 35.6% (21/59) conducted selective screening for LTBI among PLHIV. “T-SPOT only” was the most frequently used method of screening (n = 33), followed by “QFT only” (n = 11). Criteria for LTBI screening included TB burden in the country of birth of the patient, previous contact with a TB patient, and CD4+ cell count. 83.1% (49/59) either “always” or “selectively” offered TPT to PLHIV diagnosed with LTBI, and among the 49 respondents who did provide TPT, 77.6% (38/49) chose 9-months isoniazid as their first choice. None chose regimen including rifampicin.

Conclusions

Our study revealed that practices regarding TB and LTBI screening and treatment for PLHIV among HIV physicians were mixed and not necessarily in accordance with the various published guidelines. Building and disseminating scientific evidence that takes into consideration the local epidemiology of TB and HIV in Japan is urgently needed to assist physicians make decisions.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis in febrile patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the accuracy of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing active tuberculosis (ATB) in febrile patients, to explore influencing factors of positive results and to verify the potential value of QFT-Plus in the identification of ATB and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI).

METHODS

A total of 240 febrile patients with ATB (n = 80) and non-ATB (n = 160) were recruited to assess the accuracy of QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of positive results.

RESULTS

The proportion of indeterminate results (ITRS) in QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB were 3.3% and 0%, respectively. The consistency between the results of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was substantial. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB was 0.792 and 0.849 (p = 0.070), respectively. The sensitivity of differentiating ATB from non-ATB was 92.2% in QFT-Plus versus 95.0% in T-SPOT.TB. The influencing factors of T-SPOT.TB positive result were male (odds ratio (OR) = 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-4.26, p = 0.006), evidence of previous TB (OR 11.36, 95% CI 4.62-27.94, p < 0.001), while male (OR = 3.17, 95% CI 1.73-5.84, p < 0.001), evidence of previous TB (OR = 7.58, 95% CI 3.60-15.98, p <0.001), and use of immunosuppressant (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.260.94, p = 0.030) were influencing factors for QFT-Plus positive result. There was no significant difference in QFT-Plus in differentiating ATB from LTBI in febrile patients.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference between QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB in febrile patients. QFT-Plus is prone to ITRS. The influencing factors including males, evidence of the previous TB, and use of immunosuppressant should be considered when interpreting positive results.

Effect of Routine Varicella Immunization on the Epidemiology and Immunogenicity of Varicella and Shingles

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) causes varicella as a primary infection and remains latent in the ganglia until it becomes reactivated to cause herpes zoster. Individuals with varicella develop adaptive humoral and cell-mediated immunity. Compromised cell-mediated immunity is thought to contribute to the development of herpes zoster. Recent evidence suggests that changes in the epidemiology of varicella have affected the epidemiology of herpes zoster. The incidence of herpes zoster is higher in older adults; thus, the herpes zoster vaccine is recommended for older adults. However, the incidence of herpes zoster is expected to rise among younger individuals; hence, vaccination with the varicella vaccine should also be considered in younger adults. In order to determine the need for vaccination in different populations, it is important to establish methods to accurately assess the activity of cell-mediated immunity and humoral immunity.

Diagnostic Value of Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for Tuberculosis in the Immunocompromised Population

Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are widely used in the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) infection by detecting interferon-γ released by previously sensitized T-cells in-vitro. Currently, there are two assays based on either enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) technology, with several generations of products available. The diagnostic value of IGRAs in the immunocompromised population is significantly different from that in the immunocompetent population because their results are strongly affected by the host immune function. Both physiological and pathological factors can lead to an immunocompromised situation. We summarized the diagnostic value and clinical recommendations of IGRAs for different immunocompromised populations, including peoplewith physiological factors (pregnant and puerperal women, children, and older people), as well as people with pathological factors (solid organ transplantation recipients, combination with human immunodeficiency virus infection, diabetes mellitus, end-stage renal disease, end-stage liver disease, and chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases). Though the performance of IGRAs is not perfect and often requires a combination with other diagnostic strategies, it still has some value in the immunocompromised population. Hopefully, the newly developed IGRAs could better target this population.

Evaluation of the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 interferon-ɣ release assay in mRNA-1273 vaccinated health care workers

Current studies focus on cellular and humoral immunity induced by novel SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Non-responders to vaccinations are not uncommonly encountered in clinical medicine (e.g. in the field of hepatitis B). Whereas vaccine-induced humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 is compromised by emerging Variants of Concern (VOCs), cellular immunity against SARS-CoV-2 is emerging as resilient against VOCs. Thus commercially available test kits for diagnostic laboratories designed to evaluate cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 are urgently needed. Here we evaluated the novel QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay (Qiagen) measuring INF-ɣ release induced by two spike-derived peptide pools (Ag1 and Ag2) in a cohort of health care workers vaccinated with the mRNA-1273 vaccine and confirmed humoral response. Our study indicates the usefulness of this novel assay for routine laboratories to evaluate cellular immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in response to mRNA-1273 vaccination.