Clinical features of nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia due to COVID-19

Is the JRS atypical pneumonia prediction score useful in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia under nursing or healthcare settings?

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 causes frequent outbreaks in elderly care facilities that meet the criteria for nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP). We evaluated whether the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) atypical pneumonia prediction score could be adapted to the diagnosis of nursing and healthcare acquired COVID-19 (NHA-COVID-19) with pneumonia.

METHODS

We analyzed 516 pneumonia patients with NHA-COVID-19 and compared them with 1505 pneumonia patients with community-associated COVID-19 (CA-COVID-19). NHA-COVID-19 patients were divided into six groups; 80 cases had the ancestral strain, 76 cases had the Alfa variant, 30 cases had the Delta variant, 120 cases had the Omicron subvariant BA.1, 53 cases had the Omicron subvariant BA.2, and 157 cases had the Omicron subvariant BA.5.

RESULTS

The sensitivities of the diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in patients with NHA-COVID-19 based on four or more predictors were 22.8 % in the ancestral strain group, 32.0 % in the Alfa variant group, 34.5 % in the Delta variant group, 23.1 % in the BA.1 subvariant group, 32.7 % in the BA.2 subvariant group, and 30.4 % in the BA.5 subvariant group. The diagnostic sensitivity for the presumptive diagnosis of atypical pneumonia was significantly lower for NHA-COVID-19 than for CA-COVID-19 (28.2 % vs 64.1 %, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our present study demonstrated that the JRS atypical pneumonia prediction score is not a useful tool in elderly patients even if there is a lot of atypical pneumonia in the NHCAP group. The caution is necessary that JRS atypical pneumonia prediction score was not fully applied to prediction for NHA-COVID-19 pneumonia.

Nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant

BACKGROUND

There were many differences in the clinical characteristics between nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain, Alpha variant and Delta variant. With the replacement of the Delta variant by the Omicron variant, the Omicron variant showed decreased infectivity to lung and was less pathogenic. We investigated the clinical differences between NHCAP and CAP due to the Omicron variant.

METHODS

We analyzed 516 NHCAP and 547 CAP patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Of 516 patients with COVID-19 NHCAP, 330 cases were the Omicron variant (120 cases were BA.1, 53 cases were BA.2, and 157 cases were BA.5 subvariants) and 186 cases were non-Omicron variants.

RESULTS

The median age, frequency of comorbid illness, rates of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and mortality rate were significantly higher in Omicron patients with NHCAP than in those with CAP. Rates of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality were significantly higher in NHCAP patients with non-Omicron variants compared with those in the Omicron variant group. No clinical differences were observed in patients with NHCAP among the Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5 subvariant groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study supported that the NHCAP category is necessary not only for bacterial pneumonia but also viral pneumonia. It is necessary to consider prevention and treatment strategies depending on the presence or absence of applicable criteria for NHCAP.