Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus among elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Factors associated with readmission for community-onset pneumonia among older people: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Although older individuals are prone to pneumonia relapse, little real-world evidence is available on the main factors contributing to pneumonia recurrence. This study assessed the impact of patients' lifestyles on hospital readmission due to pneumonia recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively included consecutive patients (aged ≥65 years) who were admitted for community-onset pneumonia. A binary or multiple-choice postal questionnaire survey on lifestyles after hospitalization was conducted to identify the factors associated with readmission due to pneumonia recurrence.

RESULTS

Of 117 patients who responded to the questionnaires, 89 were included in the analyses after excluding 28 patients who died within 1 year of discharge. Twenty-four of 89 (27%) patients were readmitted to the hospital for pneumonia within 1 year of discharge. Multivariate analysis revealed that cerebrovascular disease (odds ratio [OR], 3.912; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.104-13.861; p = 0.035) and need of assistance at mealtime (OR, 2.225; 95% CI, 1.182-4.186; p = 0.013) were significantly associated with readmission due to pneumonia recurrence. Oral care and mealtime body position were not associated with readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Host factors, not patients' lifestyles such as oral care and body position, mainly contribute to the development of pneumonia among older people. These results should be considered risk factors for readmission by medical workers and family members.

Treatment strategy for older patients with pneumonia independent of the risk of drug resistance in the world's top country for longevity

The number of older people with impaired swallowing function increases with aging population. Aspiration pneumonia is one of the most cases of pneumonia developing among older people. As aspiration pneumonia may develop as a result of age-related deterioration, it is crucial to consider it as an unavoidable event with aging. While pneumonia is diagnosed based on respiratory symptoms and radiological features, the lung involvement of aspiration pneumonia may be undetectable via a frontal chest radiograph in some cases. Bacterial profiles show the predominance of drug-resistant bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), but isolated bacteria from respiratory samples do not necessarily indicate causative pathogens. Furthermore, there is no evidence regarding treatment superiority using broad-spectrum antibiotics compared with narrow-spectrum antibiotics. Even if isolated pathogens are a causative factor for pneumonia among older patients, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics covering the bacteria may not improve their outcomes. Therefore, we propose a treatment strategy independent of the risk of drug resistance focusing on the discrimination of patients who are unlikely to respond to broad-spectrum antibiotics. An aspiration risk is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with pneumonia, which could also lead to a greater risk of poor long-term outcomes with increased 1-year mortality. Advance care planning is now recognized as a process for communication and medical decision-making across the life course. This approach would be widely recommended for older people with aspiration risk.

Carbapenem vs. non-carbapenem antibiotics for ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem is recommended as one of the first-line regimens for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), but no recent systematic review has fully investigated its efficacy. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of carbapenem compared with non-carbapenem for VAP treatment.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the efficacy and the safety between carbapenem and non-carbapenem with activity to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the treatment for VAP. The main outcome was mortality, and the additional outcomes were the clinical cure of pneumonia, length of intensive care unit stay, recurrence, adverse effects, and the development of resistant bacteria. This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Of the initial 1,730 publications, 9 randomized control trials were enrolled. In the meta-analysis, no difference was observed between the carbapenem and non-carbapenem regimens in improving mortality (odds ratio, 0.83; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.02). While the carbapenem regimen was superior to the non-carbapenem regimen in studies reporting the resolution of pneumonia (odds ratio, 1.09; 95 % CI 1.01-1.17), the effectiveness of carbapenem treatment was not evident in studies assessing the other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Carbapenem might have no superiority in survival when treating VAP. Moreover, non-carbapenem antibiotics with activities to P. aeruginosa have a potential option to avoid inducing carbapenem-resistant pathogens.

Impact of Antibiotics Used for Acute Aspiration Bronchitis on the Prevention of Pneumonia

BACKGROUNDS

It remains unclear if antibiotics should be used for the treatment of acute aspiration bronchitis to prevent the development of pneumonia. This study aimed to assess the associations between the use of antibiotics and the development of pneumonia among patients with acute aspiration bronchitis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with acute aspiration bronchitis aged ≥75 years. Acute aspiration bronchitis was defined as a condition with aspiration risk, high fever (body temperature, ≥37.5 °C), respiratory symptoms, and the absence of evidence of pneumonia.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the incidence of pneumonia between patients treated with and without antibiotics for acute aspiration bronchitis (6/44, 14% vs. 31/143, 22%; p = 0.242). Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (adjusted odds ratio, 0.956; 95% confidence interval, 0.920-0.993) was significantly associated with the development of pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic administration should not be routinely recommended to prevent pneumonia following acute aspiration bronchitis, and patients with decreased renal function should be closely monitored. A randomized controlled trial is necessary to validate these results.

Is administration of anti-MRSA drugs recommended for patients with pneumonia when MRSA is isolated from respiratory specimens? A systematic review and meta-analysis

It is unclear whether anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) drugs should be uniformly administered to patients with pneumonia when MRSA is isolated from respiratory specimens. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the uniform administration of anti-MRSA drugs. Two researchers independently searched the literature as of December 2022, extracted relevant papers, and performed a meta-analysis. The outcomes were mortality and adverse events. No applicable randomized controlled trials were found during the study period, but four observational studies were extracted. The relative risk of mortality in the anti-MRSA group was 1.67 [95% confidence interval 0.65-4.30], which did not differ significantly from the non-administered group. Further investigation into the background of patients demonstrated that anti-MRSA drugs were administered to groups in which only MRSA was cultured. However, the pneumonia severity index did not differ from that in the non-treated group. No studies of adverse events were found. Our review did not find a beneficial contribution to mortality from uniform anti-MRSA medication to patients with pneumonia when MRSA was isolated from respiratory specimens. Factors determining risk-based individualized treatment should be validated as the future question.

Escalation of antimicrobial resistance among MRSA part 2: focus on infections and treatment

INTRODUCTION

MRSA is associated with causing a variety of infections including skin and skin structure infections, catheter and device-related (e.g. central venous catheter, prosthetic heart valve) infections, infectious endocarditis, blood stream infections, bone, and joint infections (e.g. osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint, surgical site), central nervous system infections (e.g. meningitis, brain/spinal cord abscess, ventriculitis, hydrocephalus), respiratory tract infections (e.g. hospital-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia), urinary tract infections, and gastrointestinal infections. The emergence and spread of multidrug resistant (MDR) MRSA clones has limited therapeutic options. Older agents such as vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin and a variety of newer MRSA antimicrobials and combination therapy are available to treat serious MRSA infections.

AREAS COVERED

The authors discuss infections caused by MRSA as well as common older and newer antimicrobials and combination therapy for MRSA infections. A literature search of MRSA was performed via PubMed (up to September 2022), using the keywords: antimicrobial resistance; β-lactams; multidrug resistance, Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin; glycolipopeptides.

EXPERT OPINION

Innovation, discovery, and development of new and novel classes of antimicrobial agents are critical to expand effective therapeutic options. The authors encourage the judicious use of antimicrobials in accordance with antimicrobial stewardship programs along with infection-control measures to minimize the spread of MRSA.

Impact of Pseudomonas aeruginosa coverage on the prognosis of elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Although the 2019 American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) recommend the use of antibiotics with Pseudomonas aeruginosa coverage for patients with prior sputum isolation of P. aeruginosa, further research is needed to confirm its clinical outcomes. This study aimed to assess the impact of the use of antibiotics with P. aeruginosa coverage on mortality in elderly CAP patients with sputum isolation of P. aeruginosa.

METHODS

We retrospectively included consecutive elderly patients who were hospitalized for CAP and P. aeruginosa-positive sputum culture. The association between the use of antibiotics with P. aeruginosa coverage and 28-day mortality was assessed based on propensity score to reduce selection bias.

RESULTS

A total of 216 patients were included, and 68 (31%) of them were treated with antibiotics with P. aeruginosa coverage. The number of patients treated with antibiotics with P. aeruginosa coverage was significantly higher among nonsurvivors than among survivors. After adjustment using propensity score, the association between the use of antibiotics with P. aeruginosa coverage and the 28-day mortality was found to be statistically nonsignificant (odds ratio 2.182, 95% confidence interval 0.732-6.508, p = 0.162).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of antibiotics with P. aeruginosa coverage in elderly CAP patients with sputum isolation of P. aeruginosa did not improve their prognosis. A randomized control study is required to identify cases that should be treated with antibiotics covering P. aeruginosa.