Interferon-gamma induced APOBEC3B contributes to Merkel cell polyomavirus genome mutagenesis in Merkel cell carcinoma

Chromosomal Aberrations Accumulate during Metastasis of Virus-Negative Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare, aggressive skin tumor initiated by polyomavirus integration or UV light DNA damage. In New Zealand, there is a propensity toward the UV-driven form (31 of 107, 29% virus positive). Using archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, we report targeted DNA sequencing covering 246 cancer genes on 71 tumor tissues and 38 nonmalignant tissues from 37 individuals, with 33 of 37 being negative for the virus. Somatic variants of New Zealand virus-negative Merkel cell carcinomas partially overlapped with those reported overseas, including TP53 variants in all tumors and RB1, LRP1B, NOTCH1, and EPHA3/7 variants each found in over half of the cohort. Variants in genes not analyzed or reported in previous studies were also found. Cataloging variants in TP53 and RB1 from published datasets revealed a broad distribution across these genes. Chr 1p gain and Chr 3p loss were identified in around 50% of New Zealand virus-negative Merkel cell carcinomas, and RB1 loss of heterozygosity was found in 90% of cases. Copy number variants accumulate in most metastases. Virus-negative Merkel cell carcinomas have complex combinations of somatic DNA-sequence variants and copy number variants. They likely carry the small genomic changes permissive for metastasis from early tumor development; however, chromosomal alterations may contribute to driving metastatic progression.

A review on the oncogenesis of Merkel cell carcinoma: Several subsets arise from different stages of differentiation of stem cell

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), a rare primary cutaneous neuroendocrine neoplasm, is extremely aggressive and has a higher mortality rate than melanoma. Based on Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) status and morphology, MCCs are often divided into several distinct subsets: pure MCPyV-positive, pure MCPyV-negative, and combined MCC. MCPyV-positive MCC develops by the clonal integration of viral DNA, whereas MCPyV-negative MCC is induced by frequent ultraviolet (UV)-mediated mutations, that are characterized by a high mutational burden, UV signature mutations, and many mutations in TP53 and retinoblastoma suppressor gene (RB1). Combined MCC consists of an intimate mix of MCC and other cutaneous tumor populations, and is usually MCPyV-negative, with rare exceptions. Based on the existing subsets of MCC, it is speculated that there are at least 4 stages in the natural history of stem cell differentiation: primitive pluripotent stem cells, divergent differentiated stem cells, unidirectional stem cells, and Merkel cells (or epidermal/adnexal cells). In the first stage, MCPyV may integrate into the genome of primitive pluripotent stem cells, driving oncogenesis in pure MCPyV-positive MCC. If MCPyV integration does not occur, the stem cells enter the second stage and acquire the ability to undergo multidirectional neuroendocrine and epidermal (or adnexal) differentiation. At this stage, accumulated UV-mediated mutations may drive the development of combined MCC. In the third stage, the stem cells differentiate into unidirectional neuroendocrine stem cells, UV-mediated mutations can induce carcinogenesis in pure MCPyV-negative MCC. Therefore, it has been speculated that several subsets of MCCs arise from different stages of differentiation of common stem cells.

Oncogenic Merkel Cell Polyomavirus T Antigen Truncating Mutations are Mediated by APOBEC3 Activity in Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive skin cancer, which is frequently caused by Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV). Mutations of MCPyV tumor (T) antigens are major pathologic events of virus-positive (MCPyV+) MCCs, but their source is unclear. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID)/APOBEC family cytidine deaminases contribute to antiviral immunity by mutating viral genomes and are potential carcinogenic mutators. We studied the contribution of AID/APOBEC cytidine deaminases to MCPyV large T (LT) truncation events. The MCPyV LT area in MCCs was enriched with cytosine-targeting mutations, and a strong APOBEC3 mutation signature was observed in MCC sequences. AICDA and APOBEC3 expression were detected in the Finnish MCC sample cohort, and LT expression correlated with APOBEC3H and APOBEC3G. Marginal but statistically significant somatic hypermutation targeting activity was detected in the MCPyV regulatory region. Our results suggest that APOBEC3 cytidine deaminases are a plausible cause of the LT truncating mutations in MCPyV+ MCC, while the role of AID in MCC carcinogenesis is unlikely.

Significance:

We uncover APOBEC3 mutation signature in MCPyV LT that reveals the likely cause of mutations underlying MCPyV+ MCC. We further reveal an expression pattern of APOBECs in a large Finnish MCC sample cohort. Thus, the findings presented here suggest a molecular mechanism underlying an aggressive carcinoma with poor prognosis.

APOBEC3: Friend or Foe in Human Papillomavirus Infection and Oncogenesis?

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a causative agent of multiple human cancers, including cervical and head and neck cancers. In these HPV-positive tumors, somatic mutations are caused by aberrant activation of DNA mutators such as members of the apolipoprotein B messenger RNA-editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide-like 3 (APOBEC3) family of cytidine deaminases. APOBEC3 proteins are most notable for their restriction of various viruses, including anti-HPV activity. However, the potential role of APOBEC3 proteins in HPV-induced cancer progression has recently garnered significant attention. Ongoing research stems from the observations that elevated APOBEC3 expression is driven by HPV oncogene expression and that APOBEC3 activity is likely a significant contributor to somatic mutagenesis in HPV-positive cancers. This review focuses on recent advances in the study of APOBEC3 proteins and their roles in HPV infection and HPV-driven oncogenesis. Further, we discuss critical gaps and unanswered questions in our understanding of APOBEC3 in virus-associated cancers.