1
|
Yang X, Siradze K, Sperinde G, Arjomandi A, Fischer S. Evaluation of multiple immunoassay formats for detection of anti-drug antibodies to zinpentraxin alfa. J Immunol Methods 2023; 522:113573. [PMID: 37816404 DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2023.113573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
Zinpentraxin alfa (rhPTX-2; PRM-151) is currently being developed for the treatment of fibrotic diseases such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and myelofibrosis. Notably, because it is administered chronically and has an endogenously expressed counterpart, clinical studies of zinpentraxin alpha must include immunogenicity assessments. Since the typical homogenous bridging ELISA assay does not adequately measure anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against zinpentraxin alfa, additional assay formats have been developed to evaluate immunogenicity of this therapeutic. Here, we present the evaluation of four distinct assay formats that were used to measure zinpentraxin alpha ADA: step-wise bridging, direct binding, total ADA, and the semi-homogeneous formats, based on multiple parameters including assay sensitivity, precision, and drug tolerance. This paper presents the full details of method development for each of the aforementioned assay formats including evaluation of sample pre-treatment, determination of cut point, and assessment of assay performance by analyzing a subset of clinical samples. Overall, the semi-homogenous ADA assay format with no sample pre-treatment was selected for the measurement of zinpentraxin alpha immunogenicity as it provided the desired sensitivity, drug tolerance, and reproducibility. Our study emphasizes the importance of assay format evaluation during drug development and the necessity to select the most suitable assay format and sample pre-treatment method by which to evaluate therapeutic drug immunogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyun Yang
- BioAnalytical Sciences, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
| | - Ketevan Siradze
- BioAnalytical Sciences, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | - Gizette Sperinde
- BioAnalytical Sciences, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | - Audrey Arjomandi
- BioAnalytical Sciences, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | - Saloumeh Fischer
- BioAnalytical Sciences, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suh K, Kyei I, Hage DS. Approaches for the detection and analysis of anti-drug antibodies to biopharmaceuticals: A review. J Sep Sci 2022; 45:2077-2092. [PMID: 35230731 DOI: 10.1002/jssc.202200112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-based therapeutic agents and other biopharmaceuticals are now used in the treatment of many diseases. However, when these biopharmaceuticals are administrated to patients, an immune reaction may occur that can reduce the drug's efficacy and lead to adverse side effects. The immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals can be evaluated by detecting and measuring antibodies that have been produced against these drugs, or anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Methods for ADA detection and analysis can be important during the selection of a therapeutic approach based on such drugs and is crucial when developing and testing new biopharmaceuticals. This review examines approaches that have been used for ADA detection, measurement, and characterization. Many of these approaches are based on immunoassays and antigen binding tests, including homogeneous mobility shift assays. Other techniques that have been used for the analysis of ADAs are capillary electrophoresis, reporter gene assays, surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The general principles of each approach will be discussed, along with their recent applications with regards to ADA analysis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyungah Suh
- Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
| | - Isaac Kyei
- Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
| | - David S Hage
- Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Myler H, Pedras-Vasconcelos J, Phillips K, Hottenstein CS, Chamberlain P, Devanaryan V, Gleason C, Goodman J, Manning MS, Purushothama S, Richards S, Shen H, Zoghbi J, Amaravadi L, Barger T, Bowen S, Bowsher RR, Clements-Egan A, Geng D, Goletz TJ, Gunn GR, Hallett W, Hodsdon ME, Janelsins BM, Jawa V, Kamondi S, Kirshner S, Kramer D, Liang M, Lindley K, Liu S, Liu Z, McNally J, Mikulskis A, Nelson R, Ahbari MR, Qu Q, Ruppel J, Snoeck V, Song A, Yan H, Ware M. Anti-drug Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization. AAPS J 2021; 24:4. [PMID: 34853961 PMCID: PMC8816448 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-021-00649-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Evolving immunogenicity assay performance expectations and a lack of harmonized anti-drug antibody validation testing and reporting tools have resulted in significant time spent by health authorities and sponsors on resolving filing queries. Following debate at the American Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences National Biotechnology Conference, a group was formed to address these gaps. Over the last 3 years, 44 members from 29 organizations (including 5 members from Europe and 10 members from FDA) discussed gaps in understanding immunogenicity assay requirements and have developed harmonization tools for use by industry scientists to facilitate filings to health authorities. Herein, this team provides testing and reporting strategies and tools for the following assessments: (1) pre-study validation cut point; (2) in-study cut points, including procedures for applying cut points to mixed populations; (3) system suitability control criteria for in-study plate acceptance; (4) assay sensitivity, including the selection of an appropriate low positive control; (5) specificity, including drug and target tolerance; (6) sample stability that reflects sample storage and handling conditions; (7) assay selectivity to matrix components, including hemolytic, lipemic, and disease state matrices; (8) domain specificity for multi-domain therapeutics; (9) and minimum required dilution and extraction-based sample processing for titer reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Myler
- Immunochemistry Department, PPD Laboratories, 2244 Dabney Road, Richmond, Virginia, 23230-3323, USA.
| | - João Pedras-Vasconcelos
- Product Quality and Immunogenicity, Office of Biotechnology Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drugs Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20903, USA
| | - Kelli Phillips
- Immunochemistry Department, PPD Laboratories, 2244 Dabney Road, Richmond, Virginia, 23230-3323, USA
| | - Charles Scott Hottenstein
- Immunogenicity, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, 19426, USA
| | - Paul Chamberlain
- NDA Advisory Services, Ltd., Grove House, Guildford Road, Leatherhead, KT22 9DF, Surrey, UK
| | | | - Carol Gleason
- Global Biometric and Data Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, USA
| | - Joanne Goodman
- Integrated Bioanalysis, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Shobha Purushothama
- Diagnostics Accelerator, Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation, 57W 57th Street, New York, New York, USA
| | - Susan Richards
- Translational Medicine and Early Development, Sanofi, Framingham, Massachusetts, 01701, USA
| | - Honglue Shen
- Specialty Bioanalytics, Teva Pharmaceuticals, West Chester, Pennsylvania, 19380, USA
| | - Jad Zoghbi
- Translational Medicine and Early Development, Sanofi, Framingham, Massachusetts, 01701, USA
| | | | - Troy Barger
- Bioanalytical Sciences, Amgen Research, Thousand Oaks, California, 91320, USA
| | - Steven Bowen
- Product Quality and Immunogenicity, Office of Biotechnology Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drugs Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20903, USA
| | - Ronald R Bowsher
- B2S Life Sciences, 97 East Monroe Street, Franklin, Indiana, 46131, USA
| | | | - Dong Geng
- Legend Biotech, 10 Knightsbridge Road, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08554, USA
| | - Theresa J Goletz
- Drug Metabolism & Pharmacokinetics, EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts, 01821, USA
| | - George R Gunn
- Immunogenicity, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, 19426, USA
| | - William Hallett
- Product Quality and Immunogenicity, Office of Biotechnology Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drugs Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20903, USA
| | - Michael E Hodsdon
- Laboratory for Experimental Medicine, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46285, USA
| | - Brian M Janelsins
- Product Quality and Immunogenicity, Office of Biotechnology Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drugs Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20903, USA
| | - Vibha Jawa
- Predictive and Clinical Immunogenicity Pharmacometrics, Pharmacodynamics and Drug Metabolism, Merck and Co., 2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, New Jersey, 07033, USA
| | - Szilard Kamondi
- Kamondi Bioanalytical Consultancy, Rheinfelden, Switzerland / Roche Pharma Research & Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Bioanalytical R&D, Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Susan Kirshner
- Product Quality and Immunogenicity, Office of Biotechnology Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drugs Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20903, USA
| | - Daniel Kramer
- Translational Medicine and Early Development, Sanofi, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Meina Liang
- Integrated Bioanalysis, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Susana Liu
- Pfizer Inc., 17300 Trans Canada Hwy, Kirkland, Quebec, Canada
| | - ZhenZhen Liu
- Product Quality and Immunogenicity, Office of Biotechnology Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drugs Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20903, USA
| | - Jim McNally
- BioAgilytix Labs, Durham, North Carolina, 27713, USA
| | - Alvydas Mikulskis
- Clinical Biomarkers, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, 02210, USA
| | - Robert Nelson
- Immunochemistry Department, Covance Laboratories Ltd., Harrogate, HG3 1PY, UK
| | - Mohsen Rajabi Ahbari
- Office of Study Integrity and Surveillance, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, USA
| | - Qiang Qu
- Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, 01810, USA
| | - Jane Ruppel
- BioAnalytical Sciences, Genentech, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Veerle Snoeck
- Translational Biomarkers and Bioanalysis, UCB Biopharma SRL, B-1420, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium
| | - An Song
- Development Sciences, Immune-Onc Therapeutics, Palo Alto, California, 94303, USA
| | - Haoheng Yan
- Product Quality and Immunogenicity, Office of Biotechnology Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drugs Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20903, USA
| | - Mark Ware
- Janssen BioTherapeutics, Janssen R&D LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania, 19477, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu C, Dong W, Xia L, Lv J, Jiang D, Wang Q, Wang M, Wu M, Miao J, Tao T, Wang D, Zheng L, Su S, Liu L, Fang Y. Safety and tolerability of a humanized rabbit monoclonal antibody (SSS07) in healthy adults: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled single ascending dose trial. Int Immunopharmacol 2020; 91:107263. [PMID: 33383447 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE SSS07, a humanized rabbit monoclonal antibody, can selectively block human tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). The objective of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and relative immunogenicity of SSS07 after multiple single subcutaneous (SC) doses in healthy volunteers. METHODS A total of 71 healthy volunteers were randomized to six sequential ascending-dose groups (5, 15, 30, 50, 75, and 100 mg), and except for the 100 mg group that only had one subject who received a placebo, all of the other groups included two placebo-control subjects. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were assessed by physical examinations, vital signs, electrocardiography (ECG), clinical laboratory tests, and plasma anti-drug antibody (ADA) over 28 days for each group. Their concentrations of TNF-α were also analyzed. Only after safety and tolerance were determined in the lower-dose groups was the next dose group initiated. The dose increments did not exceed 100 mg. RESULTS No serious adverse events or dose-limited toxicity (DLT) were observed, so 100 mg was defined as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Overall, 71 AEs and 59 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 36 (60.0%) and 30 (50.0%) volunteers, respectively, who received SSS07. All AEs and TRAEs were mild or moderate and expected based on previous results with similar types of drugs, without new safety concerns. Except for infections and administration site reactions, the frequency and intensity of the other TRAEs were similar for SSS07 and placebo. No severe acute immune reactions occurred. The lower dose's immunogenicity was stronger than the higher doses. The highest ADA titer was observed 3 to 6 months after administration. CONCLUSION SSS07 was generally safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese volunteers. Higher immunogenicity was observed at low SSS07 concentration levels. The infections and administration site conditions might have been related to the immunogenicity and the degree of inhibition of TNF-α. However, the existence of ADA did not appear to affect the safety of the subjects throughout the follow-up period. These findings could support further investigations of treatments with humanized monoclonal antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Liu
- Phase I Clinical Research Unit, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan People's Hospital, No. B24, Yinquan Road, Qingcheng District, Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province 511518, China
| | - Wenliang Dong
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100034, China; Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Lin Xia
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100034, China; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province 221004, China
| | - Jie Lv
- Department of Intensive Care Units, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Daoli Jiang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province 221006, China
| | - Qian Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Mei Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Maofeng Wu
- Phase I Clinical Research Unit, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan People's Hospital, No. B24, Yinquan Road, Qingcheng District, Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province 511518, China
| | - Jingwei Miao
- Phase I Clinical Research Unit, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan People's Hospital, No. B24, Yinquan Road, Qingcheng District, Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province 511518, China
| | - Tao Tao
- Shenyang Sunshine Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Economic and Technological Development Zone, Shenyang City, Liaoning Province 110027, China
| | - Dong Wang
- Shenyang Sunshine Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Economic and Technological Development Zone, Shenyang City, Liaoning Province 110027, China
| | - Lili Zheng
- Shenyang Sunshine Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Economic and Technological Development Zone, Shenyang City, Liaoning Province 110027, China
| | - Shiguang Su
- Phase I Clinical Research Unit, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan People's Hospital, No. B24, Yinquan Road, Qingcheng District, Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province 511518, China
| | - Lizhong Liu
- Phase I Clinical Research Unit, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan People's Hospital, No. B24, Yinquan Road, Qingcheng District, Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province 511518, China
| | - Yi Fang
- Phase I Clinical Research Unit, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan People's Hospital, No. B24, Yinquan Road, Qingcheng District, Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province 511518, China; Department of Pharmacy, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Overcoming multimeric target interference in a bridging immunogenicity assay with soluble target receptor, target immunodepletion and mild acidic assay pH. Bioanalysis 2020; 12:1071-1085. [PMID: 32735128 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2020-0110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Soluble multimeric target proteins can generate a target-mediated false-positive signal in bridging anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays. A high background signal due to target interference was observed in our anti-REGN-Y antibody assay, and two different strategies were evaluated to mitigate this false-positive signal. Results: Multiple anti-target antibodies were tested and found to be ineffective at reducing target interference, so soluble target receptor and co-factor proteins were used in combination to inhibit the target-mediated signal. These competitive blockers synergistically inhibited target interference and increased target tolerance levels, especially when the assay was performed under mild acidic conditions. A separate approach, target immunodepletion using magnetic beads conjugated with an anti-target antibody, was also effective at mitigating the target-mediated signal, also in combination with mild acidic assay pH. Both methods allowed detection of a true ADA signal in monkey and human post-dose serum samples. Conclusion: These methods provide alternative strategies for mitigating target interference when standard anti-target antibodies are ineffective, with the competitive blocker method being recommended, if possible, due to its higher throughput and easier execution.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mitigating target interference in bridging immunogenicity assay with target-blocking reagents and mild basic pH. Bioanalysis 2019; 11:1569-1580. [DOI: 10.4155/bio-2018-0187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Soluble drug target in clinical study samples generated false positive results in anti-drug antibody (ADA) bridging assays due to target-mediated bridging. Results: The combination of two target-blocking reagents and mild basic assay pH resulted in high tolerance to recombinant target protein and reduced levels of positivity in clinical study samples with pharmacokinetic profiles that did not indicate significant ADA response. Testing with low-affinity ADA positive serum from immunized rabbits and known ADA positive samples from nonclinical studies in rats confirmed the assay's ability to detect ADA positive samples and the minimal impact of basic pH and target-blocking reagents on ADA detection. Conclusion: These strategies provide alternatives for mitigating target interference when standard target-blocking antibodies alone are ineffective.
Collapse
|
7
|
Xiang Y, Parng C, Olson K, Seletskaia E, Gorovits B, Jani D, Caiazzo T, Joyce A, Donley J. Neutralizing Antibody Assay Development with High Drug and Target Tolerance to Support Clinical Development of an Anti-TFPI Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody. AAPS JOURNAL 2019; 21:46. [PMID: 30927117 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-019-0320-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Immunogenicity is a major challenge for protein therapeutics which can potentially reduce drug efficacy and safety and is often being monitored by anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (NAb) assays. Circulating targets and residual drugs in matrices can have significant impacts on accuracy of results from ADA and NAb assays, and sufficient drug and target tolerance for these assays are necessary. Here, we report the development of a competitive ligand binding (CLB) NAb assay for an anti-TFPI (tissue factor pathway inhibitor) monoclonal antibody (PF-06741086) with high drug and target tolerance to support ongoing clinical studies. A double acid affinity capture elution approach was used to mitigate drug interference, and a robust target removal strategy was employed to enhance target tolerance. The validated NAb assay has sensitivity of 313 ng/mL, drug tolerance of 50 μg/mL, and target tolerance of 1200 ng/mL. A step-by-step tutorial of assay development is described in this manuscript along with the rationale for using a high drug/target tolerant NAb assay. The NAb assay cut point factor obtained was 0.78. Other assay performance characteristics, e.g., precision and selectivity, are also discussed. This validated method demonstrated a superior drug and target tolerance to warrant specific and precise characterization of the NAb responses in support of ongoing clinical studies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Real-Fernández F, Pregnolato F, Cimaz R, Papini AM, Borghi MO, Meroni PL, Rovero P. Detection of anti-adalimumab antibodies in a RA responsive cohort of patients using three different techniques. Anal Biochem 2019; 566:133-138. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2018.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 09/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
9
|
Phase 1b Study of Trebananib Plus Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab in Patients With HER2-Positive Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2018; 19:47-57. [PMID: 30420181 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 09/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Trebananib, a peptide-Fc fusion protein, blocks angiogenesis by inhibiting binding of angiopoietin-1/2 to the receptor tyrosine kinase Tie2. Trebananib plus trastuzumab and paclitaxel was evaluated in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer in an open-label phase 1b clinical study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer received weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2), trastuzumab (8 mg/m2 then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks), and intravenous trebananib (10 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg weekly) beginning week 2. The primary end point was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary end points included incidence of adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics, and tumor response (objective response and duration of response). RESULTS Forty women were enrolled; 2 experienced dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 ocular transient ischemic attack [10 mg/kg cohort] and grade 3 elevation in γ-glutamyl transferase [30 mg/kg cohort]). The most common treatment-emergent AEs were peripheral edema (n = 28), diarrhea (n = 27), alopecia (n = 26), fatigue (n = 24), and nausea (n = 24). Maximum observed concentration and area under the concentration-time curve increased proportionally with the trebananib dose. Objective response was confirmed in 31 patients. In the 10 mg/kg cohort, 16 patients (80%) experienced partial response, and none experienced complete response. In the 30 mg/kg cohort, 12 patients (71%) experienced partial response and 3 (18%) experienced complete response. Median (95% confidence interval) duration of response in the 10 and 30 mg/kg cohorts was 12.6 (4.3-20.2) and 16.6 (8.2-not estimable) months, respectively. CONCLUSION This phase 1b study showed that trebananib was tolerated with manageable AEs at a dose up to 30 mg/kg weekly. Trebananib demonstrated anticancer activity, as indicated by objective response and duration of response.
Collapse
|
10
|
Development and validation of a functional cell-based neutralizing antibody assay for ipilimumab. Bioanalysis 2018; 10:1273-1287. [PMID: 29947549 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2018-0109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Ipilimumab is the first US FDA-approved immune checkpoint-blocking antibody drug to harness the patient's own immune cells. One of the postmarketing requirements is to develop a cell-based neutralizing antibody assay. Here, we share some of the most challenging aspects encountered during the assay development: new cell line construction; an unexpected inhibition of T-cell activation by low concentrations of ipilimumab; and two issues caused by sample pretreatment with acid dissociation to overcome drug interference: instability of neutralizing antibody positive control at low pH, and incompatibility of commonly used acid dissociation buffers in the cell assay. After troubleshooting and optimization, we successfully validated the assay and used the assay to test clinical samples to date.
Collapse
|
11
|
Quantitative investigation of the direct interaction between Hemagglutinin and fusion proteins of Peste des petits ruminant virus using surface Plasmon resonance. Virol J 2018; 15:21. [PMID: 29357882 PMCID: PMC5778702 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-018-0933-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The specific and dynamic interaction between the hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) proteins of morbilliviruses is a prerequisite for the conformational rearrangements and membrane fusion during infection process. The two heptad repeat regions (HRA and HRB) of F protein are both important for the triggering of F protein. Methods In this study, the direct interactions of Peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV) H with F, HRA and HRB were quantitatively evaluated using biosensor surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Results The binding affinities of immobilized pCMV-HA-H (HA-H) interacted with proteins pCMV-HA-F (HA-F) and pCMV-HA-HRB (HA-HRB) (KD = 1.91 × 10− 8 M and 2.60 × 10− 7 M, respectively) reacted an order of magnitude more strongly than that of pCMV-HA-HRA (HA-HRA) and pCMV-HA-Tp IGFR-LD (HA) (KD = 1.08 × 10− 4 M and 1.43 × 10− 4 M, respectively). Conclusions The differences of the binding affinities suggested that HRB is involved in functionally important intermolecular interaction in the fusion process.
Collapse
|
12
|
Thoren KL, Pasi B, Delgado JC, Wu AH, Lynch KL. Quantitation of Infliximab and Detection of Antidrug Antibodies in Serum by Use of Surface Plasmon Resonance. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 2:725-736. [DOI: 10.1373/jalm.2017.024380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
13
|
Zhong ZD, Clements-Egan A, Gorovits B, Maia M, Sumner G, Theobald V, Wu Y, Rajadhyaksha M. Drug Target Interference in Immunogenicity Assays: Recommendations and Mitigation Strategies. AAPS JOURNAL 2017; 19:1564-1575. [DOI: 10.1208/s12248-017-0148-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Accepted: 07/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
14
|
Kavita U, Duo J, Crawford SM, Liu R, Valcin J, Gleason C, Dong H, Gadkari S, Dodge RW, Pillutla RC, DeSilva BS. A systematic study of the effect of low pH acid treatment on anti-drug antibodies specific for a domain antibody therapeutic: Impact on drug tolerance, assay sensitivity and post-validation method assessment of ADA in clinical serum samples. J Immunol Methods 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2017.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
15
|
Leary SES, Park JR, Reid JM, Ralya AT, Baruchel S, Wu B, Roberts TPL, Liu X, Minard CG, Fox E, Weigel B, Blaney S. Pediatric Phase I Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Trebananib in Relapsed Solid Tumors, Including Primary Tumors of the Central Nervous System ADVL1115: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Report. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23:6062-6069. [PMID: 28751444 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-2882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2016] [Revised: 03/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Trebananib is a first-in-class antiangiogenic peptibody (peptide-Fc fusion protein) that inhibits Angiopoietin 1 and 2. A pediatric phase 1 trial was performed to define trebananib dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and pharmacokinetics (PK).Experimental Design: Trebananib was administered by weekly infusion. Three dose levels (10, 15, or 30 mg/kg/dose) were evaluated using a rolling-six design. Part 2 evaluated a cohort of subjects with primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Pharmacokinetic sampling and analysis of peripheral blood biomarkers was performed during the first 4 weeks. Response was evaluated after 8 weeks. Correlative studies included angiogenic protein expression and DCE-MRI.Results: Thirty-seven subjects were enrolled (31 evaluable for toxicity) with median age 12 years (range, 2 to 21). Two of 19 evaluable non-CNS subjects developed DLT at the 30 mg/kg dose level, including venous thrombosis and pleural effusion. In the CNS cohort, 3/12 subjects developed DLT, including decreased platelet count, transient ischemic attack, and cerebral edema with headache and hydrocephalus. Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities included lymphopenia (n = 4), anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, vomiting, and hypertension (n = 1 each). Response included stable disease in 7 subjects, no partial or complete responses. Two subjects continued study treatment with prolonged stable disease for 18 cycles (neuroblastoma) and 26 cycles (anaplastic astrocytoma). Pharmacokinetics appeared linear over 3 dose levels. Correlative studies demonstrated increased PlGF and sVCAM-1, but no change in endoglin or perfusion by DCE-MRI.Conclusions: Trebananib was well tolerated in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid or CNS tumors. RP2D is 30 mg/kg. Clin Cancer Res; 23(20); 6062-9. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E S Leary
- Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Julie R Park
- Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | - Bing Wu
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario
| | | | - Xiaowei Liu
- Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia, California
| | - Charles G Minard
- Dan L. Duncan Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth Fox
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wu B, Lewis LD, Harvey RD, Rasmussen E, Gamelin E, Sun YN, Friberg G, Koyner JL, Dowlati A, Maitland ML. A Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Trebananib, an Fc-Fusion Peptibody, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Varying Degrees of Renal Dysfunction. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2017; 102:313-320. [PMID: 28074547 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2016] [Revised: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Clearance of trebananib (AMG 386), a 64-kD antiangiogenic peptibody, has been associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We prospectively evaluated trebananib pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability in advanced solid tumor patients with varying degrees of renal function. Patients were assigned to normal renal function, mild, moderate, or severe renal dysfunction cohorts based on eGFR, received trebananib 15 mg/kg i.v. weekly, and underwent week 1 and week 5 pharmacokinetic and weekly safety assessments. For 28 patients, trebananib clearance decreased from normal renal function (1.52 mL/hr/kg), to mild (1.20 mL/hr/kg), moderate (0.79 mL/hr/kg), and severe (0.53 mL/hr/kg) renal dysfunction (P ≤ 0.001). Treatment-related adverse events showed no association with clearance. Trebananib clearance was proportional to eGFR and unrelated to pretreatment protein excretion. These data confirm a role for renal clearance of a recombinant peptibody with molecular weight <69 kD and support a longer dosing interval for patients with severe renal dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Wu
- Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
| | - L D Lewis
- Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - R D Harvey
- Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - E Gamelin
- Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
| | - Y-N Sun
- Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
| | - G Friberg
- Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
| | - J L Koyner
- University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - A Dowlati
- Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - M L Maitland
- University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Inova Schar Cancer Institute and Center for Personalized Health, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Novel drug and soluble target tolerant antidrug antibody assay for therapeutic antibodies bearing the P329G mutation. Bioanalysis 2017; 9:849-859. [DOI: 10.4155/bio-2017-0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Bridging immunoassays for detection of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) are typically susceptible to high concentrations of residual drug. Sensitive drug-tolerant assays are, therefore, needed. Materials & methods: An immune complex assay to detect ADAs against therapeutic antibodies bearing Pro329Gly mutation was established. The assay uses antibodies specific for the Pro329Gly mutation for capture and human soluble Fcγ receptor for detection. Results: When compared with a bridging assay, the new assay showed similar precision, high sensitivity to IgG1 ADA and dramatically improved drug tolerance. However, it was not able to detect early (IgM-based) immune responses. Conclusion: Applied in combination with a bridging assay, the novel assay serves as orthogonal assay for immunogenicity assessment and allows further characterization of ADA responses.
Collapse
|
18
|
Detection of antidrug antibodies against human therapeutic antibodies lacking Fc-effector functions by usage of soluble Fcγ receptor I. Bioanalysis 2016; 8:2135-45. [PMID: 27582032 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2016-0182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Bridging immunoassays for the detection of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) are limited to detection of bivalent molecules and are prone to interference by drug and soluble targets. Hence, alternative approaches for ADA detection are desired. Materials & methods: A novel ADA assay with secondary Fc detection using human soluble Fcγ receptor I (hsFcγRI) was established and compared with standard bridging assay. RESULTS Both assays showed consistent results in human and cynomolgus monkey samples. In contrast to the bridging assay, the hsFcγRI-based assay was insensitive to the presence of oligomeric targets and appeared to have better drug tolerance. CONCLUSION The hsFcγRI-based ADA assay can serve as alternative screening assay or as orthogonal confirmation method for preclinical and clinical immunogenicity testing of IgG therapeutics lacking Fc effector functions.
Collapse
|
19
|
Paliwal A, Tomar M, Gupta V. Table top surface plasmon resonance measurement system for efficient urea biosensing using ZnO thin film matrix. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS 2016; 21:87006. [PMID: 27552310 DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.21.8.087006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The present report addresses the application of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) phenomenon for urea sensing. The former promises a high sensitivity, label-free detection, and real-time information by monitoring the refractive index change at the metal–dielectric interface. In the present report, a highly sensitive urea biosensor has been developed by integrating a ZnO thin film matrix with the SPR technique. Kretschmann configuration has been used to excite the surface plasmon (SP) modes at the ZnO–metal (gold) interface using an indigeneously developed table top SPR measurement setup. Urease (Urs), the urea-specific enzyme, has been immobilized on the surface of ZnO thin film by physical adsorption technique. The SPR reflectance curves were recorded for the prism/Au/ZnO/Urs system in angular interrogation mode with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution as the liquid media. The SPR resonance angle is found to be shifted toward a lower angle from 49.1 to 42.0 deg with an increase in the urea concentration (0 to 300 mg/dl) in the PBS solution. The developed sensor (prism/Au/ZnO/Urs) is found to be highly sensitive [sensitivity=0.039 deg/(mg/dl) or 203 deg/RIU] with detection accuracy of 0.045(deg)(−1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayushi Paliwal
- University of Delhi, Department of Physics and Astrophysics, Delhi 110007, India
| | - Monika Tomar
- University of Delhi, Physics Department, Miranda House, Delhi 110007, India
| | - Vinay Gupta
- University of Delhi, Department of Physics and Astrophysics, Delhi 110007, India
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Evaluation of Multiple Immunoassay Technology Platforms to Select the Anti-Drug Antibody Assay Exhibiting the Most Appropriate Drug and Target Tolerance. J Immunol Res 2016; 2016:5069678. [PMID: 27243038 PMCID: PMC4868908 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5069678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2015] [Revised: 03/11/2016] [Accepted: 03/30/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was, at the assay development stage and thus with an appropriate degree of rigor, to select the most appropriate technology platform and sample pretreatment procedure for a clinical ADA assay. Thus, ELISA, MSD, Gyrolab, and AlphaLISA immunoassay platforms were evaluated in association with target depletion and acid dissociation sample pretreatment steps. An acid dissociation step successfully improved the drug tolerance for all 4 technology platforms and the required drug tolerance was achieved with the Gyrolab and MSD platforms. The target tolerance was shown to be better for the ELISA format, where an acid dissociation treatment step alone was sufficient to achieve the desired target tolerance. However, inclusion of a target depletion step in conjunction with the acid treatment raised the target tolerance to the desired level for all of the technologies. A higher sensitivity was observed for the MSD and Gyrolab assays and the ELISA, MSD, and Gyrolab all displayed acceptable interdonor variability. This study highlights the usefulness of evaluating the performance of different assay platforms at an early stage in the assay development process to aid in the selection of the best fit-for-purpose technology platform and sample pretreatment steps.
Collapse
|
21
|
Dowlati A, Vlahovic G, Natale RB, Rasmussen E, Singh I, Hwang YC, Rossi J, Bass MB, Friberg G, Pickett CA. A Phase I, First-in-Human Study of AMG 780, an Angiopoietin-1 and -2 Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22:4574-84. [PMID: 27076631 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2015] [Accepted: 03/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the toxicity, pharmacokinetics, tumor vascular response, tumor response, and pharmacodynamics of AMG 780, a mAb designed to inhibit the interaction between angiopoietin-1 and -2 and the Tie2 receptor. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN This was a phase I dose-escalation study of patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard treatment without previous antiangiogenic treatment. AMG 780 was administered by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks in doses from 0.1 to 30 mg/kg. The primary endpoints were incidences of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and adverse events (AE), and pharmacokinetics. Secondary endpoints included tumor response, changes in tumor volume and vascularity, and anti-AMG 780 antibody formation. RESULTS Forty-five patients were enrolled across nine dose cohorts. Three patients had DLTs (0.6, 10, and 30 mg/kg), none of which prevented dose escalation. At 30 mg/kg, no MTD was reached. Pharmacokinetics of AMG 780 were dose proportional; median terminal elimination half-life was 8 to 13 days. No anti-AMG 780 antibodies were detected. At week 5, 6 of 16 evaluable patients had a >20% decrease in volume transfer constant (K(trans)), suggesting reduced capillary blood flow/permeability. The most frequent AEs were hypoalbuminemia (33%), peripheral edema (29%), decreased appetite (27%), and fatigue (27%). Among 35 evaluable patients, none had an objective response; 8 achieved stable disease. CONCLUSIONS AMG 780 could be administered at doses up to 30 mg/kg every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors. AMG 780 treatment resulted in tumor vascular effects in some patients. AEs were in line with toxicity associated with antiangiopoietin treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4574-84. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afshin Dowlati
- Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Indirect assessment of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies utilizing pharmacokinetic assay data. J Immunol Methods 2015; 429:28-38. [PMID: 26711311 DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2015.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2015] [Revised: 12/18/2015] [Accepted: 12/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (NAbs) can adversely impact efficacy and safety of biologic therapeutics. However, current assay formats to detect NAbs are limited in their use during the dosing phase due to interference by circulating drug, resulting in low drug tolerance. To improve the drug tolerance for NAb detection, an alternative approach for indirect NAb (iNAb) assessment was developed and qualified that uses a combination of pharmacokinetic (PK) assays to measure the serum concentrations of free and total drug. It is demonstrated that the ratio of free to total drug concentrations, referred to as F/T ratio, is a novel PK parameter that can indicate neutralizing activity in test samples. The iNAb assessment correctly identified NAb-positive samples with high drug concentrations that led to false negative results in a conventional NAb assay. Moreover, iNAb reliably distinguished between NAbs and non-neutralizing anti-drug antibodies over a wide range of concentrations. A proposal on how to deploy iNAb assessment within a broader immunogenicity testing strategy is presented.
Collapse
|
23
|
Elshabrawy HA, Chen Z, Volin MV, Ravella S, Virupannavar S, Shahrara S. The pathogenic role of angiogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis. Angiogenesis 2015; 18:433-48. [PMID: 26198292 PMCID: PMC4879881 DOI: 10.1007/s10456-015-9477-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 340] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2015] [Accepted: 07/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Angiogenesis is the formation of new capillaries from pre-existing vasculature, which plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of several inflammatory autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthropathies, psoriasis, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, and atherosclerosis. In RA, excessive migration of circulating leukocytes into the inflamed joint necessitates formation of new blood vessels to provide nutrients and oxygen to the hypertrophic joint. The dominance of the pro-angiogenic factors over the endogenous angiostatic mediators triggers angiogenesis. In this review article, we highlight the underlying mechanisms by which cells present in the RA synovial tissue are modulated to secrete pro-angiogenic factors. We focus on the significance of pro-angiogenic factors such as growth factors, hypoxia-inducible factors, cytokines, chemokines, matrix metalloproteinases, and adhesion molecules on RA pathogenesis. As pro-angiogenic factors are primarily produced from RA synovial tissue macrophages and fibroblasts, we emphasize the key role of RA synovial tissue lining layer in maintaining synovitis through neovascularization. Lastly, we summarize the specific approaches utilized to target angiogenesis. We conclude that the formation of new blood vessels plays an indispensable role in RA progression. However, since the function of several pro-angiogenic mediators is cross regulated, discovering novel approaches to target multiple cascades or selecting an upstream cascade that impairs the activity of a number of pro-angiogenic factors may provide a promising strategy for RA therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hatem A Elshabrawy
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, MSB 835 S Wolcott Ave., E807-E809, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Zhenlong Chen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, MSB 835 S Wolcott Ave., E807-E809, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Michael V Volin
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, 60515, USA
| | - Shalini Ravella
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, MSB 835 S Wolcott Ave., E807-E809, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Shanti Virupannavar
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, MSB 835 S Wolcott Ave., E807-E809, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Shiva Shahrara
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, MSB 835 S Wolcott Ave., E807-E809, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ren Y, Mu Y, Song Y, Xie J, Yu H, Gao S, Li S, Peng H, Zhou Y, Lu W. A new peptide ligand for colon cancer targeted delivery of micelles. Drug Deliv 2015; 23:1763-72. [DOI: 10.3109/10717544.2015.1077293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
|
25
|
Surface plasmon resonance-based methodology for anti-adalimumab antibody identification and kinetic characterization. Anal Bioanal Chem 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-8915-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
26
|
Diamond JR, Wu B, Agarwal N, Bowles DW, Lam ET, Werner TL, Rasmussen E, Gamelin E, Soto F, Friberg G, Sun YN, Sharma S. Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study of the angiopoietin-1/angiopoietin-2-inhibiting peptibody trebananib (AMG 386) and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 2015; 33:691-9. [PMID: 25895965 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-015-0236-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2015] [Accepted: 03/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trebananib is an anti-angiogenic peptibody under investigation in patients with advanced cancer. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interaction of paclitaxel and trebananib. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid tumors received weekly 80 mg/m(2) intravenous (IV) paclitaxel (3 weeks on/1 week off) with weekly 15 mg/kg IV trebananib starting at Week 2. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at Week 1 (paclitaxel alone), Week 6 (paclitaxel and trebananib), and Week 8 (trebananib alone). An absence of interaction was to be concluded if the 90 % confidence intervals (CI) for the differences in paclitaxel exposure fell within the 0.80-1.25 interval. RESULTS The primary study was conducted between 7/2012 and 10/2013. Thirty-five patients were enrolled and 34 received both treatments. Most patients were white (91 %) and female (59 %); mean age was 61 years. The most common tumor types were ovarian (32 %) and bladder (27 %), 71 % of patients had stage IV disease, and all had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores of 0 or 1. PK parameter analysis was done on patients with evaluable PK data at both assessments (with and without concomitant therapy; n = 28). The geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratio (90 % CI) of paclitaxel AUCinf with and without trebananib was 1.17 (1.10, 1.25). The GLSM ratio (90 % CI) of trebananib AUCtau,ss with and without paclitaxel was 0.92 (0.87, 0.97). The most common adverse events were fatigue, local edema, peripheral edema, and nausea. CONCLUSIONS This study showed no evidence of clinically meaningful PK interaction between paclitaxel and trebananib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R Diamond
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Davidoff SN, Ditto NT, Brooks AE, Eckman J, Brooks BD. Surface Plasmon Resonance for Therapeutic Antibody Characterization. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2617-6_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
28
|
Angiogenic growth factors interactome and drug discovery: The contribution of surface plasmon resonance. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2014; 26:293-310. [PMID: 25465594 DOI: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2014] [Revised: 11/10/2014] [Accepted: 11/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Angiogenesis is implicated in several pathological conditions, including cancer, and in regenerative processes, including the formation of collateral blood vessels after stroke. Physiological angiogenesis is the outcome of a fine balance between the action of angiogenic growth factors (AGFs) and anti-angiogenic molecules, while pathological angiogenesis occurs when this balance is pushed toward AGFs. AGFs interact with multiple endothelial cell (EC) surface receptors inducing cell proliferation, migration and proteases upregulation. On the contrary, free or extracellular matrix-associated molecules inhibit angiogenesis by sequestering AGFs (thus hampering EC stimulation) or by interacting with specific EC receptors inducing apoptosis or decreasing responsiveness to AGFs. Thus, angiogenesis results from an intricate network of interactions among pro- and anti-angiogenic molecules, EC receptors and various modulators. All these interactions represent targets for the development of pro- or anti-angiogenic therapies. These aims call for suitable technologies to study the countless interactions occurring during neovascularization. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is a label-free optical technique to study biomolecular interactions in real time. It has become the golden standard technology for interaction analysis in biomedical research, including angiogenesis. From a survey of the literature it emerges that SPR has already contributed substantially to the better understanding of the neovascularization process, laying the basis for the decoding of the angiogenesis "interactome" and the identification of "hub molecules" that may represent preferential targets for an efficacious modulation of angiogenesis. Here, the still unexploited full potential of SPR is enlightened, pointing to improvements in its use for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of neovascularization and the identification of novel anti-angiogenic drugs.
Collapse
|
29
|
Vergote I, Oaknin A, Baurain JF, Ananda S, Wong S, Su X, Wu B, Zhong Z, Warner D, Casado A. A phase 1b, open-label study of trebananib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with ovarian cancer receiving interval or primary debulking surgery. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50:2408-16. [PMID: 25037684 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2014] [Revised: 06/10/2014] [Accepted: 06/13/2014] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the tolerability, pharmacokinetics and tumour response of first-line trebananib plus paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by trebananib maintenance in high-risk or advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS In this open-label phase 1b study, patients received intravenous (IV) trebananib 15 mg/kg administered weekly (QW) plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks (Q3W) and carboplatin 6 mg/mL · min Q3W followed by trebananib 15 mg/kg QW monotherapy for 18 months. End-points were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; primary); treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), anti-trebananib antibodies, pharmacokinetics and tumour response (secondary). RESULTS Twenty seven patients (interval debulking surgery [IDS], n=13) were enrolled. No DLTs occurred. During the combination therapy phase, AEs (>50%) in patients with IDS were nausea, diarrhoea, fatigue, decreased appetite and thrombocytopenia. In patients with primary debulking surgery (PDS), they were nausea, diarrhoea, fatigue and localised oedema. Grade 4 AEs were neutropenia (IDS, PDS; all n=3) and thrombocytopenia (IDS, PDS; all n=1). No deaths occurred. Toxicity results pertaining to trebananib maintenance were immature. The treatment combination did not markedly affect the pharmacokinetics across agents. In patients with IDS (n=14 after one patient was reassigned from PDS to IDS), 12 patients had a partial response (PR), two patients had stable disease. In patients with PDS (n=4), three patients had a complete response, one patient had a PR. CONCLUSIONS In women with ovarian cancer receiving IDS or PDS, IV trebananib 15 mg/kg QW plus paclitaxel and carboplatin appears tolerable. Results suggest that the treatment combination followed by trebananib 15 mg/kg monotherapy is associated with antitumour activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Vergote
- University Hospitals-KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - A Oaknin
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Medical Oncology Department, and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Head, Neck, and Gynecological Tumors Group, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain.
| | - J-F Baurain
- Université Catholique de Louvain, Centre du Cancer, Service d'Oncologie Médicale des Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Bruxelles 1200, Belgium.
| | - S Ananda
- Royal Women's Hospital, Oncology Unit, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville 3052, VIC, Australia.
| | - S Wong
- Western Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Research Level 2 South, Gordon Street, Footscray 3011, VIC, Australia.
| | - X Su
- Amgen Inc., Department of Biostatistics, One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799, USA.
| | - B Wu
- Amgen Inc., Department of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799, USA.
| | - Z Zhong
- Amgen Inc., Department of Clinical Immunology and Biological Sample Management, One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799, USA.
| | - D Warner
- Amgen Inc., Department of Clinical Development, One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799, USA.
| | - A Casado
- Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Servicio de Oncologia Medica, Calle del Professor Martín Lagos s/n, Madrid 28040, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Interference in immunoassays to support therapeutic antibody development in preclinical and clinical studies. Bioanalysis 2014; 6:1939-51. [DOI: 10.4155/bio.14.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
During preclinical and clinical studies, immunoassays are used to measure the concentration of the therapeutic antibody, anti-drug antibodies and soluble protein biomarkers. The reliability of these assays is crucial since the results are routinely used for safety assessment and dose selection. Furthermore, soluble protein biomarkers can provide information about target engagement, proof of mechanism, proof of principle and prediction of response. Study samples mostly consist of complex matrices that can exhibit considerable interference, resulting in inaccurate measurements. This perspective discusses the source of interference and strategies to mitigate or eliminate interference in immunoassays used during preclinical and clinical drug development of drugs with a focus on the development of therapeutic antibodies.
Collapse
|
31
|
Orthogonal tools to help determine the required selectivity of ligand-binding assays in drug development. Bioanalysis 2014; 6:1037-40. [DOI: 10.4155/bio.14.47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
|