Protective effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker and calcium channel blocker on endothelial vasomotor function after everolimus-eluting stent implantation

Acetylcholine Use in Modern Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The use of acetylcholine for the diagnosis of vasospastic angina is recommended by international guidelines. However, its intracoronary use is still off-label due to the absence of safety studies. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature to identify adverse events related to the intracoronary administration of acetylcholine for vasoreactivity testing to fill this gap.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a systematic review of observational studies and randomized controlled trials dealing with the intracoronary administration of acetylcholine. Articles were searched in MEDLINE (PubMed) using the MeSH strategy. Three independent reviewers determined whether the studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 434 articles were selected. Data concerning clinical characteristics, study population, acetylcholine dosage, and adverse effects were retrieved from the articles. Overall, 71,566 patients were included, of which only 382 (0.5%) developed one adverse event, and there were no fatal events reported (0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary administration of acetylcholine in the setting of coronary spasm provocation testing is safe and plays a central role in the evaluation of coronary vasomotion disorders, making it worthy of becoming a part of clinical practice in all cardiac catheterization laboratories.

Impact of glycemic variability on coronary and peripheral endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported that glucose variability leads to endothelial dysfunction and progression of coronary atherosclerosis. However, few studies have directly evaluated the relation between glucose variability and coronary endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

A total of 38 patients with chronic CAD and a history of coronary drug-eluting stent implantation were enroled. Coronary endothelial function was evaluated by measuring the coronary vasoreactivity using quantitative coronary angiography in the segment distal to implanted stent in response to intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) infusion (10-7 mol/l). Peripheral endothelial function was also assessed with reactive hyperemia index (RHI). The mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE) was calculated as a primary metric of glucose variability using a flash glucose monitoring system.

RESULTS

Of 38 patients, 17 (45%) had diabetes mellitus. The mean levels of glycated hemoglobin, MAGE, and RHI were 6.3 ± 0.8%, 71.4 ± 29.8 mg/dl, and 1.85 ± 0.63. In the distal segment to coronary stent, lumen diameter was constricted by 0.6 ± 7.3% in response to intracoronary ACh infusion compared to that at baseline. While peripheral endothelial function assessed with RHI was not significantly associated with MAGE (r = -0.16, p = 0.35), coronary endothelial function was correlated with MAGE (r = -0.38, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Greater glucose variability was significantly associated with coronary rather than peripheral endothelial dysfunction in patients with CAD, suggesting an impact of glucose variability on coronary atherosclerosis.

Dose-Response Relationship Between Intracoronary Acetylcholine and Minimal Lumen Diameter in Coronary Endothelial Function Testing of Women and Men With Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary acetylcholine (Ach) provocation testing is the gold standard for assessing coronary endothelial function. However, dosing regimens of Ach are quite varied in the literature, and there are limited data evaluating the optimal dose. We evaluated the dose-response relationship between Ach and minimal lumen diameter (MLD) by sex and studied whether incremental intracoronary Ach doses given during endothelial function testing improve its diagnostic utility.

METHODS

We evaluated 65 men and 212 women with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease who underwent endothelial function testing using the highest tolerable dose of intracoronary Ach, up to 200 μg. Epicardial endothelial dysfunction was defined as a decrease in MLD >20% after intracoronary Ach by quantitative coronary angiography. We used a linear mixed effects model to evaluate the dose-response relationship. Deming regression analysis was done to compare the %MLD constriction after incremental doses of intracoronary Ach.

RESULTS

The mean age was 53.5 years. Endothelial dysfunction was present in 186 (68.1%). Among men with endothelial dysfunction, there was a significant decrease in MLD/10 µg of Ach at doses above 50 μg and 100 µg, while this decrease in MLD was not observed in women (P<0.001). The %MLD constriction at 20 μg versus 50 μg and 50 μg versus 100 μg were not equivalent while the %MLD constriction at 100 μg versus 200 μg were equivalent.

CONCLUSIONS

Women and men appear to have different responses to Ach during endothelial function testing. In addition to having a greater response to intracoronary Ach at all doses, men also demonstrate an Ach-MLD dose-response relationship with doses up to 200 μg, while women have minimal change in MLD with doses above 50 µg. An incremental dosing regimen during endothelial function testing appears to improve the diagnostic utility of the test and should be adjusted based on the sex of the patient.

Renin-angiotensin system blockade reduces cardiovascular events in nonheart failure, stable patients with prior coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The effects of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade on the clinical outcome in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) are conflicting. We evaluated the long-term effects of RAS blockers (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker) on the clinical outcomes in patients with SCAD without heart failure (HF) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent using a large-scale, multicenter, prospective cohort registry.

METHODS

A total of 5722 patients with SCAD were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the use of RAS blockers after PCI: RAS blocker group included 4070 patients and no RAS blocker group included 1652 patients. Exclusion criteria were left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50% and the history of HF or myocardial infarction. A major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 29.7 months, RAS blockers were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of MACE [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.781; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.626-0.975; P=0.015] and all-cause death (adjusted HR: 0.788; 95% CI: 0.627-0.990; P=0.041) but did not affect the risk of coronary revascularization. In the propensity score matched cohort, overall findings were consistent (MACE: adjusted HR: 0.679; 95% CI: 0.514-0.897; P=0.006; all-cause death: adjusted HR: 0.723; 95% CI: 0.548-0.954; P=0.022), and the benefit of RAS blockade was maintained in all predefined subgroups.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that RAS blockers were effective preventive therapies for reducing long-term cardiovascular events in patients with SCAD without HF who underwent PCI.