Optimising Elastic Network Models for Protein Dynamics and Allostery: Spatial and Modal Cut-offs and Backbone Stiffness

Protein dynamics underlying allosteric regulation

Allostery is the mechanism by which information and control are propagated in biomolecules. It regulates ligand binding, chemical reactions, and conformational changes. An increasing level of experimental resolution and control over allosteric mechanisms promises a deeper understanding of the molecular basis for life and powerful new therapeutics. In this review, we survey the literature for an up-to-date biological and theoretical understanding of protein allostery. By delineating five ways in which the energy landscape or the kinetics of a system may change to give rise to allostery, we aim to help the reader grasp its physical origins. To illustrate this framework, we examine three systems that display these forms of allostery: allosteric inhibitors of beta-lactamases, thermosensation of TRP channels, and the role of kinetic allostery in the function of kinases. Finally, we summarize the growing power of computational tools available to investigate the different forms of allostery presented in this review.

The "violin model": Looking at community networks for dynamic allostery

Allosteric regulation of proteins continues to be an engaging research topic for the scientific community. Models describing allosteric communication have evolved from focusing on conformation-based descriptors of protein structural changes to appreciating the role of internal protein dynamics as a mediator of allostery. Here, we explain a "violin model" for allostery as a contemporary method for approaching the Cooper-Dryden model based on redistribution of protein thermal fluctuations. Based on graph theory, the violin model makes use of community network analysis to functionally cluster correlated protein motions obtained from molecular dynamics simulations. This Review provides the theory and workflow of the methodology and explains the application of violin model to unravel the workings of protein kinase A.

Explicit versus implicit consideration of binding partners in protein-protein complex to elucidate intrinsic dynamics

The binding of many proteins to their protein partners is tightly regulated via control of their relative intrinsic dynamics during the binding process, a phenomenon which can in turn be modulated. Therefore, investigating the intrinsic dynamics of proteins is necessary to understand function in a comprehensive way. By intrinsic dynamics herein, we principally refer to the vibrational signature of a protein molecule popularly obtained from normal modes or essential modes. For normal modes, one often considers that the molecule under investigation is a collection of springs in a solvent-free or implicit-solvent medium. In the context of a protein-binding partner, the analysis of vibration of the target protein is often complicated due to molecular interaction within the complex. Generally, it is assumed that the isolated bound conformation of the target protein captures the implicit effect of the binding partner on the intrinsic dynamics, therefore suggesting that any influence of the partner molecule is also already integrated. Such an assumption allows large-scale studies of the conservation of protein flexibility. However, in cases where a partner protein directly influences the vibration of the target via critical contacts at the protein-protein interface, the above assumption falls short of providing a detailed view. In this review article, we discuss the implications of considering the dynamics of a protein in a protein-protein complex, as modelled implicitly and explicitly with methods dependent on elastic network models. We further propose how such an explicit consideration can be applied to understand critical protein-protein contacts that can be targeted in future studies.