Development of a diagnostic prediction model for giant cell arteritis by sequential application of Southend Giant Cell Arteritis Probability Score and ultrasonography: a prospective multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Giant cell arteritis is a critically ischaemic disease with protean manifestations that require urgent diagnosis and treatment. European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations advocate ultrasonography as the first investigation for suspected giant cell arteritis. We developed a prediction tool that sequentially combines clinical assessment, as determined by the Southend Giant Cell Arteritis Probability Score (SGCAPS), with results of quantitative ultrasonography.

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre, inception cohort study included consecutive patients with suspected new onset giant cell arteritis referred to fast-track clinics (seven centres in Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and UK). Final clinical diagnosis was established at 6 months. SGCAPS and quantitative ultrasonography of temporal and axillary arteries with three scores (ie, halo count, halo score, and OMERACT GCA Score [OGUS]) were performed at diagnosis. We developed prediction models for diagnosis of giant cell arteritis by multivariable logistic regression analysis with SGCAPS and each of the three ultrasonographic scores as predicting variables. We obtained intraclass correlation coefficient for inter-rater and intra-rater reliability in a separate patient-based reliability exercise with five patients and five observers.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022, we recruited and followed up 229 patients (150 [66%] women and 79 [34%] men; mean age 71 years [SD 10]), of whom 84 were diagnosed with giant cell arteritis and 145 with giant cell arteritis mimics (controls) at 6 months. SGCAPS and all three ultrasonographic scores discriminated well between patients with and without giant cell arteritis. A reliability exercise showed that the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability was high for all three ultrasonographic scores. The prediction model combining SGCAPS with the halo count, which was termed HAS-GCA score, was the most accurate model, with an optimism-adjusted C statistic of 0·969 (95% CI 0·952 to 0·990). The HAS-GCA score could classify 169 (74%) of 229 patients into either the low or high probability groups, with misclassification observed in two (2%) of 105 patients in the low probability group and two (3%) of 64 of patients in the high probability group. A nomogram for easy application of the score in daily practice was created.

INTERPRETATION

A prediction tool for giant cell arteritis (the HAS-GCA score), combining SGCAPS and the halo count, reliably confirms and excludes giant cell arteritis from giant cell arteritis mimics in fast-track clinics. These findings require confirmation in an independent, multicentre study.

FUNDING

Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, FOREUM.

Treat-to-target recommendations in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica

OBJECTIVES

To develop treat-to-target (T2T) recommendations in giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to retrieve data on treatment targets and outcomes in GCA/PMR as well as to identify the evidence for the effectiveness of a T2T-based management approach in these diseases. Based on evidence and expert opinion, the task force (29 participants from 10 countries consisting of physicians, a healthcare professional and a patient) developed recommendations, with consensus obtained through voting. The final level of agreement was provided anonymously.

RESULTS

Five overarching principles and six-specific recommendations were formulated. Management of GCA and PMR should be based on shared decisions between patient and physician recognising the need for urgent treatment of GCA to avoid ischaemic complications, and it should aim at maximising health-related quality of life in both diseases. The treatment targets are achievement and maintenance of remission, as well as prevention of tissue ischaemia and vascular damage. Comorbidities need to be considered when assessing disease activity and selecting treatment.

CONCLUSION

These are the first T2T recommendations for GCA and PMR. Treatment targets, as well as strategies to assess, achieve and maintain these targets have been defined. The research agenda highlights the gaps in evidence and the need for future research.

Subclinical giant cell arteritis in polymyalgia rheumatica: Concurrent conditions or a common spectrum of inflammatory diseases?

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) are common conditions in older adults. Their clinical connection has been recognized over time, with many patients experiencing both conditions separately, simultaneously or in temporal sequence to each other. Early GCA detection is essential to prevent vascular damage, but identifying subclinical GCA in PMR patients remains a challenge and routine screening is not standard practice. Subclinical GCA prevalence in newly diagnosed PMR patients ranges from 23 to 29%, depending on the screening method. Vessel wall imaging and temporal artery biopsy can detect subclinical GCA. Epidemiology and trigger factors show similarities between the two conditions, but PMR is more common than GCA. Genetic and pathogenesis studies reveal shared inflammatory mechanisms involving dendritic cells, pro-inflammatory macrophages, and an IL-6 signature. However, the inflammatory infiltrates differ, with extensive T cell infiltrates seen in GCA while PMR shows an incomplete profile of T cell and macrophage-derived cytokines. Glucocorticoid treatment is effective for both conditions, but the steroid requirements vary. PMR overall mortality might be similar to the general population, while GCA patients with aortic inflammatory aneurysms face increased mortality risk. The GCA-PMR association warrants further research. Considering their kinship, recently the term GCA-PMR Spectrum Disease (GPSD) has been proposed.

Stratification of biological therapies by pathobiology in biologic-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (STRAP and STRAP-EU): two parallel, open-label, biopsy-driven, randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Despite highly effective targeted therapies for rheumatoid arthritis, about 40% of patients respond poorly, and predictive biomarkers for treatment choices are lacking. We did a biopsy-driven trial to compare the response to rituximab, etanercept, and tocilizumab in biologic-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis stratified for synovial B cell status.

METHODS

STRAP and STRAP-EU were two parallel, open-label, biopsy-driven, stratified, randomised, phase 3 trials done across 26 university centres in the UK and Europe. Biologic-naive patients aged 18 years or older with rheumatoid arthritis based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria and an inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were included. Following ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy, patients were classified as B cell poor or B cell rich according to synovial B cell signatures and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to intravenous rituximab (1000 mg at week 0 and week 2), subcutaneous tocilizumab (162 mg per week), or subcutaneous etanercept (50 mg per week). The primary outcome was the 16-week ACR20 response in the B cell-poor, intention-to-treat population (defined as all randomly assigned patients), with data pooled from the two trials, comparing etanercept and tocilizumab (grouped) versus rituximab. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. These trials are registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register, 2014-003529-16 (STRAP) and 2017-004079-30 (STRAP-EU).

FINDINGS

Between June 8, 2015, and July 4, 2019, 226 patients were randomly assigned to etanercept (n=73), tocilizumab (n=74), and rituximab (n=79). Three patients (one in each group) were excluded after randomisation because they received parenteral steroids in the 4 weeks before recruitment. 168 (75%) of 223 patients in the intention-to-treat population were women and 170 (76%) were White. In the B cell-poor population, ACR20 response at 16 weeks (primary endpoint) showed no significant differences between etanercept and tocilizumab grouped together and rituximab (46 [60%] of 77 patients vs 26 [59%] of 44; odds ratio 1·02 [95% CI 0·47-2·17], p=0·97). No differences were observed for adverse events, including serious adverse events, which occurred in six (6%) of 102 patients in the rituximab group, nine (6%) of 108 patients in the etanercept group, and three (4%) of 73 patients in the tocilizumab group (p=0·53).

INTERPRETATION

In this biologic-naive population of patients with rheumatoid arthrtitis, the dichotomic classification into synovial B cell poor versus rich did not predict treatment response to B cell depletion with rituximab compared with alternative treatment strategies. However, the lack of response to rituximab in patients with a pauci-immune pathotype and the higher risk of structural damage progression in B cell-rich patients treated with rituximab warrant further investigations into the ability of synovial tissue analyses to inform disease pathogenesis and treatment response.

FUNDING

UK Medical Research Council and Versus Arthritis.

A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in patients with giant cell arteritis

BACKGROUND

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is primarily treated with glucocorticoids (GCs), which have substantial toxicity. Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6-receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ri), showed beneficial effects in GCA, leading to its approval. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of sarilumab (another IL-6Ri) in GCA.

METHODS

This Phase 3, double-blind study comprised a 52-week treatment period and a 24-week follow-up phase. Eligible GCA patients were randomized to receive sarilumab 200 mg (SAR200 + 26W) or 150 mg (SAR150 + 26W) with a 26-week GC taper, or placebo with a 52-week (PBO + 52W) or 26-week (PBO + 26W) GC taper. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained remission (SR) at week 52. Additional endpoints were SR at week 24, cumulative GC dose, and safety. The study was discontinued prematurely due to protracted recruitment timelines, because of the impact of COVID-19. Therefore, only descriptive statistics were summarized.

RESULTS

Of the planned 360 subjects, only 83 were randomized and 36 were included in the week 52 analysis. At week 52, 46% (n = 6/13) of patients in SAR200 + 26W, 43% (n = 3/7) in SAR150 + 26W, 30% (n = 3/10) in PBO + 52W, and 0 (n = 0/6) in PBO + 26W taper groups achieved SR. Sensitivity analyses, excluding acute-phase reactants from the SR definition, showed similar results for SAR groups, but 60% (n = 6/10) in PBO + 52W and 17% (n = 1/6) in PBO + 26W taper groups achieved SR at week 52. Similar findings were noted at week 24. The proportions of patients who adhered to GC taper from week 12 through week 52 in each group were as follows: 46% (n = 6/13, SAR200 + 26W), 43% (n = 3/7, SAR150 + 26W), 60% (n = 6/10, PBO + 52W), and 33% (n = 2/6, PBO + 26W). The median actual cumulative GC dose received in the SAR200 + 26W group was lower than other groups. Most patients (80-100%) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events, with similar incidences reported across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to the small sample size due to the early termination, it is difficult to draw clear conclusions from this study. There were no unexpected safety findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03600805. Registered on July 26, 2018.

Sarilumab for Relapse of Polymyalgia Rheumatica during Glucocorticoid Taper

BACKGROUND

More than half of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica have a relapse during tapering of glucocorticoid therapy. Previous studies have suggested that interleukin-6 blockade may be clinically useful in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica. Sarilumab, a human monoclonal antibody, binds interleukin-6 receptor α and efficiently blocks the interleukin-6 pathway.

METHODS

In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive 52 weeks of a twice-monthly subcutaneous injection of either sarilumab (at a dose of 200 mg) plus a 14-week prednisone taper or placebo plus a 52-week prednisone taper. The primary outcome at 52 weeks was sustained remission, which was defined as the resolution of signs and symptoms of polymyalgia rheumatica by week 12 and sustained normalization of the C-reactive protein level, absence of disease flare, and adherence to the prednisone taper from weeks 12 through 52.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients underwent randomization (60 to receive sarilumab and 58 to receive placebo). At week 52, sustained remission occurred in 28% (17 of 60 patients) in the sarilumab group and in 10% (6 of 58 patients) in the placebo group (difference, 18 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 4 to 32; P = 0.02). The median cumulative glucocorticoid dose at 52 weeks was significantly lower in the sarilumab group than in the placebo group (777 mg vs. 2044 mg; P<0.001). The most common adverse events with sarilumab as compared with placebo were neutropenia (15% vs. 0%), arthralgia (15% vs. 5%), and diarrhea (12% vs. 2%). More treatment-related discontinuations were observed in the sarilumab group than in the placebo group (12% vs. 7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Sarilumab showed significant efficacy in achieving sustained remission and reducing the cumulative glucocorticoid dose in patients with a relapse of polymyalgia rheumatica during glucocorticoid tapering. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; SAPHYR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03600818.).

EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice: 2023 update

OBJECTIVES

To update the EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging modalities in primary large vessel vasculitis (LVV).

METHODS

A systematic literature review update was performed to retrieve new evidence on ultrasound, MRI, CT and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for diagnosis, monitoring and outcome prediction in LVV. The task force consisted of 24 physicians, health professionals and patients from 14 countries. The recommendations were updated based on evidence and expert opinion, iterating until voting indicated consensus. The level of agreement was determined by anonymous votes.

RESULTS

Three overarching principles and eight recommendations were agreed. Compared to the 2018 version, ultrasound is now recommended as first-line imaging test in all patients with suspected giant cell arteritis, and axillary arteries should be included in the standard examination. As an alternative to ultrasound, cranial and extracranial arteries can be examined by FDG-PET or MRI. For Takayasu arteritis, MRI is the preferred imaging modality; FDG-PET, CT or ultrasound are alternatives. Although imaging is not routinely recommended for follow-up, ultrasound, FDG-PET or MRI may be used for assessing vessel abnormalities in LVV patients with suspected relapse, particularly when laboratory markers of inflammation are unreliable. MR-angiography, CT-angiography or ultrasound may be used for long-term monitoring of structural damage, particularly at sites of preceding vascular inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2023 EULAR recommendations provide up-to-date guidance for the role of imaging in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with LVV.

Disease stratification in GCA and PMR: state of the art and future perspectives

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) are closely related conditions characterized by systemic inflammation, a predominant IL-6 signature, an excellent response to glucocorticoids, a tendency to a chronic and relapsing course, and older age of the affected population. This Review highlights the emerging view that these diseases should be approached as linked conditions, unified under the term GCA-PMR spectrum disease (GPSD). In addition, GCA and PMR should be seen as non-monolithic conditions, with different risks of developing acute ischaemic complications and chronic vascular and tissue damage, different responses to available therapies and disparate relapse rates. A comprehensive stratification strategy for GPSD, guided by clinical findings, imaging and laboratory data, facilitates appropriate therapy and cost-effective use of health-economic resources. Patients presenting with predominant cranial symptoms and vascular involvement, who usually have a borderline elevation of inflammatory markers, are at an increased risk of sight loss in early disease but have fewer relapses in the long term, whereas the opposite is observed in patients with predominant large-vessel vasculitis. How the involvement of peripheral joint structures affects disease outcomes remains uncertain and understudied. In the future, all cases of new-onset GPSD should undergo early disease stratification, with their management adapted accordingly.

The provisional OMERACT ultrasonography score for giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVES

To develop an Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) ultrasonography score for monitoring disease activity in giant cell arteritis (GCA) and evaluate its metric properties.

METHODS

The OMERACT Instrument Selection Algorithm was followed. Forty-nine members of the OMERACT ultrasonography large vessel vasculitis working group were invited to seven Delphi rounds. An online reliability exercise was conducted using images of bilateral common temporal arteries, parietal and frontal branches as well as axillary arteries from 16 patients with GCA and 7 controls. Sensitivity to change and convergent construct validity were tested using data from a prospective cohort of patients with new GCA in which ultrasound-based intima-media thickness (IMT) measurements were conducted at weeks 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24.

RESULTS

Agreement was obtained (92.7%) for the OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS), calculated as follows: sum of IMT measured in every segment divided by the rounded cut-off values of IMTs in each segment. The resulting value is then divided by the number of segments available. Thirty-five members conducted the reliability exercise, the interrater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the OGUS was 0.72-0.84 and the median intrareader ICC was 0.91. The prospective cohort consisted of 52 patients. Sensitivity to change between baseline and each follow-up visit up to week 24 yielded standardised mean differences from -1.19 to -2.16, corresponding to large and very large magnitudes of change, respectively. OGUS correlated moderately with erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein and Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (corrcoeff 0.37-0.48).

CONCLUSION

We developed a provisional OGUS for potential use in clinical trials.

RNA Modification Detection Using Nanopore Direct RNA Sequencing and nanoDoc2

RNA modifications regulate multiple aspects of cellular function including RNA splicing, translation, export, decay, stability, and phase separation. One of the comprehensive ways to detect such modifications is by the recent advancement of direct RNA sequencing from Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT). However, this method obtains a large amount of data with high complexity in the form of raw current signal that poses a new informatics challenge to accurately detect those modifications. Here, we provide nanoDoc2, a software to detect multiple types of RNA modification from nanopore direct RNA sequencing data. The nanoDoc2 includes a novel signal segmentation algorithm based on the trace value-a base probability feature that is added by the Guppy basecalling program from ONT during processing of the raw signal. The core of nanoDoc2 includes a machine learning algorithm in which a 6-mer segmented raw current signal is analyzed by deep one-class classification using a WaveNet-based neural network. As an output, an RNA modification is detected by a statistical score in each candidate position. Herein, we describe the detailed instructions on how to use nanoDoc2 for signal segmentation, train/test the neural network, and finally predict RNA modifications present in nanopore direct RNA sequencing data.

An international survey of current management practices for polymyalgia rheumatica by general practitioners and rheumatologists

OBJECTIVES

To explore current management practices for polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) by general practitioners (GPs) and rheumatologists including implications for clinical trial recruitment.

METHODS

An English language questionnaire was constructed by a working group of rheumatologists and GPs from 6 countries. The questionnaire focused on: 1: Respondent characteristics, 2: Referral practices, 3: Treatment with glucocorticoids, 4: Diagnostics, 5: Comorbidities, and 6: Barriers to research. The questionnaire was distributed to rheumatologists and GPs worldwide via members of the International PMR/giant cell arteritis Study Group.

RESULTS

In total, 394 GPs and 937 rheumatologists responded to the survey. GPs referred a median of 25% of their suspected PMR patients for diagnosis and 50% of these were returned to their GP for management. In general, 39% of rheumatologists evaluated patients with suspected PMR >2 weeks after referral, and a median of 50% of patients had started prednisolone before rheumatologist evaluation. Direct comparison of initial treatment showed that the percentage prescribing >25 mg prednisolone daily for patients was 30% for GPs and 12% for rheumatologists. Diagnostic imaging was rarely used. More than half (56%) of rheumatologists experienced difficulties recruiting people with PMR to clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

This large international survey indicates that a large proportion of people with PMR are not referred for diagnosis, and that the proportion of treatment naïve patients declined with increasing time from referral to assessment. Strategies are needed to change referral and management of people with PMR, to improve clinical practice and facilitate recruitment to clinical trials.

Explicit versus implicit consideration of binding partners in protein-protein complex to elucidate intrinsic dynamics

The binding of many proteins to their protein partners is tightly regulated via control of their relative intrinsic dynamics during the binding process, a phenomenon which can in turn be modulated. Therefore, investigating the intrinsic dynamics of proteins is necessary to understand function in a comprehensive way. By intrinsic dynamics herein, we principally refer to the vibrational signature of a protein molecule popularly obtained from normal modes or essential modes. For normal modes, one often considers that the molecule under investigation is a collection of springs in a solvent-free or implicit-solvent medium. In the context of a protein-binding partner, the analysis of vibration of the target protein is often complicated due to molecular interaction within the complex. Generally, it is assumed that the isolated bound conformation of the target protein captures the implicit effect of the binding partner on the intrinsic dynamics, therefore suggesting that any influence of the partner molecule is also already integrated. Such an assumption allows large-scale studies of the conservation of protein flexibility. However, in cases where a partner protein directly influences the vibration of the target via critical contacts at the protein-protein interface, the above assumption falls short of providing a detailed view. In this review article, we discuss the implications of considering the dynamics of a protein in a protein-protein complex, as modelled implicitly and explicitly with methods dependent on elastic network models. We further propose how such an explicit consideration can be applied to understand critical protein-protein contacts that can be targeted in future studies.

2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Classification Criteria for Takayasu Arteritis

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate new classification criteria for Takayasu arteritis (TAK).

METHODS

Patients with vasculitis or comparator diseases were recruited into an international cohort. The study proceeded in 6 phases: 1) identification of candidate criteria items, 2) collection of candidate items present at diagnosis, 3) expert panel review of cases, 4) data-driven reduction of candidate items, 5) derivation of a points-based classification score in a development data set, and 6) validation in an independent data set.

RESULTS

The development data set consisted of 316 cases of TAK and 323 comparators. The validation data set consisted of an additional 146 cases of TAK and 127 comparators. Age ≤60 years at diagnosis and imaging evidence of large-vessel vasculitis were absolute requirements to classify a patient as having TAK. The final criteria items and weights were as follows: female sex (+1), angina (+2), limb claudication (+2), arterial bruit (+2), reduced upper extremity pulse (+2), reduced pulse or tenderness of a carotid artery (+2), blood pressure difference between arms of ≥20 mm Hg (+1), number of affected arterial territories (+1 to +3), paired artery involvement (+1), and abdominal aorta plus renal or mesenteric involvement (+3). A patient could be classified as having TAK with a cumulative score of ≥5 points. When these criteria were tested in the validation data set, the model area under the curve was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.94-0.99) with a sensitivity of 93.8% (95% CI 88.6-97.1%) and specificity of 99.2% (95% CI 96.7-100.0%).

CONCLUSION

The 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for TAK are now validated for use in research.

A hybrid approach to study large conformational transitions of biomolecules from single particle XFEL diffraction data

X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL) is the latest generation of the X-ray source that could become an invaluable technique in structural biology. XFEL has ultrashort pulse duration, extreme peak brilliance, and high spatial coherence, which could enable the observation of the biological molecules in near nature state at room temperature without crystallization. However, for biological systems, due to their low diffraction power and complexity of sample delivery, experiments and data analysis are not straightforward, making it extremely challenging to reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) structures from single particle XFEL data. Given the current limitations to the amount and resolution of the data from such XFEL experiments, we propose a new hybrid approach for characterizing biomolecular conformational transitions by using a single 2D low-resolution XFEL diffraction pattern in combination with another known conformation. In our method, we represent the molecular structure with a coarse-grained model, the Gaussian mixture model, to describe large conformational transitions from low-resolution XFEL data. We obtain plausible 3D structural models that are consistent with the XFEL diffraction pattern by deforming an initial structural model to maximize the similarity between the target pattern and the simulated diffraction patterns from the candidate models. We tested the proposed algorithm on two biomolecules of different sizes with different complexities of conformational transitions, adenylate kinase, and elongation factor 2, using synthetic XFEL data. The results show that, with the proposed algorithm, we can successfully describe the conformational transitions by flexibly fitting the coarse-grained model of one conformation to become consistent with an XFEL diffraction pattern simulated from another conformation. In addition, we showed that the incident beam orientation has some effect on the accuracy of the 3D structure modeling and discussed the reasons for the inaccuracies for certain orientations. The proposed method could serve as an alternative approach for retrieving information on 3D conformational transitions from the XFEL diffraction patterns to interpret experimental data. Since the molecules are represented by Gaussian kernels and no atomic structure is needed in principle, such a method could also be used as a tool to seek initial models for 3D reconstruction algorithms.

Contribution of pathogenic T helper 1 and 17 cells to bursitis and tenosynovitis in polymyalgia rheumatica

Background

Although polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a very common rheumatic inflammatory disease, current insight into the pathobiology of PMR is limited and largely based on studies in blood. We investigated T helper 1 (T_H1) and T helper 17 (T_H17) cell responses in blood, synovial fluid and bursa tissue of patients with PMR.

Materials and methods

Blood samples were collected from 18 patients with new-onset PMR and 32 healthy controls. Synovial fluid was aspirated from the inflamed shoulder bursae or biceps tendon sheath of 13 patients. Ultrasound-guided biopsies of the subacromial-subdeltoid (SASD) bursa were obtained from 11 patients. T cells were examined by flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining.

Results

Besides an increase of T_H17 (CD4⁺IL-17⁺IFN-γ^-) cells and T cytotoxic 17 (T_C17; CD8⁺IL-17⁺IFN-γ^-) cells, no other major changes were noted in the circulating T cell compartment of patients with PMR. Absolute numbers of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells were similar in blood and synovial fluid of patients with PMR. Synovial fluid T cells showed an effector-memory (CD45RO⁺CCR7^-) phenotype. Percentages of T_H1 (CD4⁺IFN-γ⁺IL-17^-) cells and T_H1/T_H17 (CD4⁺IFN-γ⁺IL-17⁺) cells, but not T_H17 or T_C17 cells, were increased in the synovial fluid. Bursa tissue biopsies contained a small number of T cells, which were mostly CD8 negative. The majority of bursa tissue T cells produced IFN-γ but not IL-17. For comparison, B cells were scarcely detected in the bursa tissue.

Conclusion

Although the circulating T_H17 cell pool is expanded in patients with PMR, our findings indicate that T_H1 cells are involved in the inflammation of bursae and tendon sheaths in this condition. Our study points towards the T_H1 cell pathway as a potential target for therapy in PMR.

AB0584 MANAGEMENT OF REFERRALS, TREATMENT STRATEGY, AND RESEARCH CHALLENGES IN POLYMYALGIA RHEUMATICA AMONGST RHEUMATOLOGISTS WORLDWIDE: A QUESTIONNAIRE BASED STUDY

Background

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is diagnosed and treated by both general practitioners (GP) and rheumatologists. How rheumatologists around the world manage the referral process of patients with PMR from GP’s has not been described. EULAR/ACR guidelines recommend initial prednisolone doses between 12.5 and 25 mg, but it is unknown if guidelines are followed in daily clinical practice1. In addition, the understanding of challenges for recruitment to clinical trials in PMR is currently limited.

Objectives

This study aims to describe the management of referrals, treatment strategy, and recruitment to clinical trials in PMR among rheumatologists worldwide.

Methods

An English language questionnaire was drafted by a working group of rheumatologists and GP’s from 6 different countries. Questions concerned: 1: respondent, 2: referrals, 3: prednisolone, and 4: barriers to research. Questionnaires were distributed to rheumatologists via members of the International PMR/GCA study group. Answers were collected via an online survey tool (Redcap), from 2nd of November 2021 to 27th of January 2022. Countries were grouped by income and geographical region based on the World bank classifications. Data were weighted by number of inhabitants in a country, based on the United Nations age specific population count, divided by number of respondents in a country. Countries with more than 20 respondents were included.

Results

Results from 27 countries were analysed including 1000 responders in total (Figure 1). There was large variation in time from referral to first assessment, initial dose of prednisolone was high, duration of treatment was relatively short, and a large proportion of patients with newly diagnosed PMR received prednisolone prior to rheumatological evaluation (Table 1). Concerning the 15% of respondents who performed research in PMR, 52% had participated in clinical trials and 56% of the responders experienced difficulties with recruitment.

Table 1.

Characteristics of reponders, referrals, and treatment.

Geographical regionIncomeThe worldEurope and Central AsiaNorth AmericaLatin AmericaEast Asia and PacificSouth AsiaMiddle East and AfricaHigh- income countriesLow- and middle- income countriesRespondersResponders (n), Completed questionnaire (total)875 (1000)294 (304)78 (81)136 (152)53 (53)53 (72)261 (338)446 (458)429 (542)Experience as rheumatologist (years)11 (6-20)12 (6-20)7 (4-20)11 (6-23)21 (10-30)7 (4-10)9 (5-18)11 (5-22)8 (5-12)ReferralsGP’s can discuss patients prior to referral, %647979575860677461Referred patients seen (%)100 (90-100)100 (90-100)100 (100-100)100 (100-100)100 (95-100)100 (100-100)100 (60-100)100 (100-100)100 (90-100)Evaluation > 2 weeks after referral, %26498060216185815PrednisoloneStarted prior to rheumatological evaluation (%)50 (20-50)60 (30-80)70 (50-80)50 (10-50)30 (20-50)50 (20-80)20 (0-50)50 (30-80)50 (10-70)Initial dose (mg)20 (15-40)20 (15-20)20 (15-20)20 (20-40)15 (15-15)20 (15-40)20 (15-40)15 (15-20)20 (15-40)Initial dose > 25 mg, %32964104143642Duration of treatment (months)12 (6-12)12 (12-18)12 (10-18)6 (3-12)18 (12-18)12 (6-12)6 (3-12)12 (12-18)9 (6-12)

Data presented as weighted median (interquartile range) unless otherwise stated.

GP: general practitioner

Conclusion

This is the first description of current practice in managing referrals and treatment of PMR by rheumatologists worldwide. In general, median treatment duration was according to EULAR/ACR guidelines, but initial dose of prednisolone was often higher than recommended in many parts of the world. PMR patients were often seen more than two weeks after referral, and treatment had started prior to first rheumatological evaluation.

References

[1]Dejaco C, Singh YP, Perel P, et al. 2015 Recommendations for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica: a European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology collaborative initiative. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2015; 74(10): 1799-807.

Acknowledgements

This study was endorsed by the international PMR/GCA study group.

Disclosure of Interests

Agnete Overgaard Donskov: None declared, Sarah Mackie: None declared, Ellen-Margrethe Hauge Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Sanofi, Sobi, MSD, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Sanofi, Sobi, MSD, UCB, Grant/research support from: Novo Nordic Foundation, Danish Rheumatism Association, Danish Regions Medicine Grants, Roche, Novartis, Celgene, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sobi, CARLOS TORO GUTIÉRREZ: None declared, Ib Hansen: None declared, Andrea Hemmig: None declared, Aatke van der Maas: None declared, Tamer A Gheita: None declared, Berit Dalsgaard NIelsen Paid instructor for: Roche, Karen Douglas: None declared, Richard Conway Speakers bureau: Janssen, Roche, Sanofi, Abbvie,, Elena Rezus: None declared, Bhaskar Dasgupta: None declared, Sara Monti: None declared, Eric Matteson Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim,, Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim,, Sebastian E. Sattui Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Mark Matza: None declared, Vanessa Ocampo Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Andrea Bran: None declared, Simone Appenzeller Grant/research support from: GSK, Annelise Goecke Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Recalcine. Consultant Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, NELLY COLMAN MC LEOD Speakers bureau: Laboratorios FAPASA (Farmacéutica Paraguay), Helen Keen Speakers bureau: Roche, Abbvie, Masataka Kuwana: None declared, Latika Gupta: None declared, Babur Salim: None declared, Ghita Harifi Speakers bureau: Abvie, Johnson and johnson, Lilly, Novartis, Mariama Erraoui: None declared, Nelly Ziade Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Paid instructor for: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Sanofi-Aventis, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis., Consultant of: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Sandoz, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Celgene - Algorithm, Bristol-Myers Squibb - NewBridge, Pfizer, Nizar Abdulateef Al-Ani: None declared, Adeola Ajibade: None declared, Johannes Knitza: None declared, Line Frølund: None declared, Max Yates: None declared, Victor Pimentel-Quiroz: None declared, Andre Lyrio: None declared, Maria Sandovici: None declared, Kornelis van der Geest Speakers bureau: Roche, Toby Helliwell Grant/research support from: Valneva, Elisabeth Brouwer Speakers bureau: Roche, Christian Dejaco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Galapagos and Sanofi, Consultant of: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Roche, Galapagos and Sanofi, Kresten Keller: None declared

AB0596 AORTIC MANIFESTATIONS IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS: SINGLE CENTRE 10-YEAR EXPERIENCE

Background

Disease stratification in GCA is an urgent need, with patients categorised into cranial and large-vessel GCA (LV-GCA) subgroups. LV-GCA may have worse outcomes with regards relapsing disease, poor response to glucocorticoids (GC) and aortic involvement.

Objectives

We report a single centre experience using clinical, imaging and treatment outcomes from a specialist clinic.

Methods

134 patients with LV-GCA were identified over a 10-year period at Southend University Hospital (2012-2022). Medical records were reviewed retrospectively for baseline demographics, clinical presentation, inflammatory markers, imaging (vascular ultrasound, PET-CT, echocardiography), vascular damage and treatment.

Results

There was a female predominance (female n=91). Age at presentation ranged from 46 to 86 years (median 70 years). Co-morbidities implicated in aortic disease included hypertension (n=60), hypercholestrolaemia (n=29), diabetes (n=14), aortic valvular disease (n=5) and atherosclerotic disease including coronary and carotid artery disease (n=19). Constitutional disturbance was most frequently observed presentation (70%, n=94), and the only feature for 11 patients. This was followed by cranial symptoms (62%, n=83), polymyalgia (53%, n=71), ischaemic symptoms i.e., visual disturbance or tongue/jaw claudication (24%, n=32) and cardiovascular presentations (7%, n=9). The latter included limb claudication, stroke, and aortic aneurysm. Although LV-GCA refers to extra-cranial disease, 12 patients (9%) had isolated cranial and/or ischaemic symptoms at initial presentation.

Inflammatory markers were typically elevated at presentation, C-reactive protein ranged from 1-425mg/L and ESR 1-130mm. Vascular ultrasound was used at diagnosis in 93 patients, with positive temporal artery findings in 50% (n=38) and positive axillary findings in 75% (n=57). PET-CT data was available for 125 patients, of which 113 were positive for LV-GCA. Thoracic aorta FDG-uptake was seen in 77%, with 7 ascending and 1 abdominal aortic aneurysm observed. Transthoracic echocardiogram was available for 46% (n=62). Four (6.5%) patients had a dilated aortic root when indexed to height as per British Society of Echocardiography (BSE) guidelines1 (SOV (mm/m) > 21.8mm in males and > 20.7mm in females). Values for our patients were 22.6 and 21.2 mm/m for the female patients and 29.2 and 25.2 mm/m for the male patients. Furthermore, 32 patients showed some extent of diastolic dysfunction as per BSE criteria (52%).

All patients received GC as part of their treatment, 60% (n=82) needing one or more DMARDs and 17% (n=23) Tocilizumab for relapsing disease. DMARDs used included Leflunomide (n=63), Methotrexate (n=18), Mycophenolate mofetil (n=3) and Azathioprine (n=1). One patient received cyclophosphamide.

Conclusion

By combined imaging modalities, 11 patients (8%) had evidence of ascending aortic damage. Grade 1 diastolic dysfunction can be age related, so this may be association rather than causation2,3. Over half of patients had not undergone echocardiogram evaluation, so there may be a hidden burden of disease. Many patients required GC-sparing therapy, showing GC alone are often not enough to halt disease progression, and vascular damage was relatively reduced compared to historical reports. The authors feel GCA services should include standardised protocols for early DMARDs, continuing thorough assessment for LV-GCA and vascular damage, including echocardiography, progressing to cross-sectional imaging if indicated.

References

[1]Harkness A. et al. Normal reference intervals for cardiac dimensions and function for use in echocardiographic practice: a guideline from the British Society of Echocardiography”. Echo Research and Practice 7.1 (2020): G1-G18.

[2]Sanders, D et al. Diastolic dysfunction, cardiovascular aging, and the anesthesiologist. Anesthesiology clinics vol. 27,3 (2009): 497-517.

[3]Jakovljevic and Djordje G. Physical activity and cardiovascular aging: Physiological and molecular insights. Experimental gerontology vol. 109 (2018): 67-74.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0818 SOUTHEND PRE-TEST PROBABILITY SCORE AND HALO SCORE AS MARKERS FOR DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF GCA: EARLY RESULTS FROM THE PROSPECTIVE HAS-GCA STUDY

Background

Ultrasound (US) is recommended as the first line imaging test in patients with suspected Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA). Traditionally, the US halo sign has been used for diagnosis. We have recently described a composite Halo Score that allows to quantify vascular inflammation on US. Prospective studies on response and disease monitoring are lacking.

Objectives

To prospectively assess the role of US in diagnosing and monitoring GCA patients. We report early baseline and 12-month data on our current recruitment in a study that has suffered disruption from the pandemic.

Methods

HAS GCA (IRAS#264294) is an ongoing, prospective, multicentre study recruiting from referrals of suspected GCA to fast-track clinics. Based on the Southend GCA clinical pre-test probability score (SPTPS)1, patients were stratified in to low, intermediate and high risk categories2. Temporal and axillary US Halo Scores were calculated from the halo thickness and extent in bilateral temporal arteries, parietal and frontal branches (TAHS) and axillary arteries (AAHS). These scores were summed (TAHS x1 plus; AAHS x3) to generate a Total Halo Score (THS)3.

Mann Whitney U test was used to compare baseline features between GCA and controls. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate disease features at baseline and at 12 months in GCA patients. Sensitivity (Sn), Specificity (Sp) and ROC curve were calculated, where applicable. P value <0.05 is statistically significant

Results

202 patients (71 GCA, 131 controls) have been recruited thus far: 23 completed 12-month follow up assessment; 6 were lost to follow up (4 died, 2 withdrew consent due to pandemic). Demographics, clinical features, and US results are shown (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline features of GCA patients and controls

GCA (n=71)Controls (n=131)P-valueAge, median (IQR)75 (70-81)68 (62-76)0.001Female, n (%)38 (54)89 (68)0.05SPTPS category, n (%) Low risk0 (0)59 (45)<0.001 Intermediate risk16 (23)49 (37)0.04 High risk55 (77)23 (18)<0.001Halo score (HS), median (range) Temporal artery HS12 (0-22)2 (0-17)<0.0001 Axillary artery HS12 (0-21)6 (0-18)<0.0001 Total HS21 (2-40)8 (0-29)<0.0001Clinical features, n (%) Temporal headache53 (75)93 (71)0.62 Scalp tenderness36 (51)40 (31)0.006 Jaw claudication38 (54)9 (7)<0.001 PMR symptoms29 (41)35 (27)0.06 Constitutional symptoms42 (59)29 (22)<0.001 Visual disturbance40 (56)58 (44)0.11 Vision loss21 (30)9 (7)<0.001

AA, axillary artery; GCA, Giant cell arteritis; TA, Temporal artery

Among GCA patients, 50 had cranial, 5 large-vessel and 16 mixed phenotypes. Diseases were diagnosed by US and additional tests such as PET CT.

Jaw claudication (54%) and constitutional symptoms (59%) were the dominant features in GCA patients. Median age was 75 years in GCA (54% females) and 68 years in controls (68% females). GCA and controls were stratified by SPTPS to Low risk (0% vs 45%; Sn-undefined, Sp-98), Intermediate risk (23% vs 37%; Sn-81, Sp-98) and High risk (77% vs 18%; Sn-98, Sp-91). Optimal SPTPS cut-off point was ≥12 (Sn-89, Sp-76).

Median THS was 21 in GCA and 8 in controls. Optimal cut-off Halo Score in diagnosis was TAHS ≥5 (Sn-89, Sp-86), AAHS ≥11 (Sn-55, Sp-75), THS ≥15 (Sn-79%, Sp-86%). Baseline Halo Score and CRP levels showed positive correlation (spearman rank correlation). Among the 23 patients who completed 12-months follow up, median TAHS, AAHS and THS reduced from 12 to 2, 12 to 6 and 21 to 10, respectively (Figure 1).

Conclusion

Along with SPTPS, Halo Score successfully discriminates GCA from non GCA mimics and. HS is effective in showing 12-month response. This score may be a useful marker to monitor GCA disease activity

References

[1]Laskou F et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019

[2]Sebastian A et al. RMD Open. 2020

[3]Sebastian A et al. BMC Rheumatol. 2020

Disclosure of Interests

Alwin Sebastian: None declared, Alessandro Tomelleri: None declared, Pierluigi Macchioni: None declared, Giulia Klinowski: None declared, Carlo Salvarani: None declared, Abdul Kayani: None declared, Mohammad Tariq: None declared, Diana Prieto-Peña: None declared, Edoardo Conticini: None declared, Muhammad Khurshid: None declared, Sue Inness: None declared, Jo Jackson: None declared, Kornelis van der Geest Speakers bureau: Roche, Grant/research support from: Mandema stipend, Bhaskar Dasgupta: None declared

LB0006 SARILUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSING POLYMYALGIA RHEUMATICA: A PHASE 3, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND, PLACEBO CONTROLLED TRIAL (SAPHYR)

Background

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is elevated in patients with active polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and is associated with disease activity, relapse and severity. Clinical trials with IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) inhibitors in PMR showed higher remission rates and reduced glucocorticoid (GC) use vs GC alone.1-4

Objectives

The SAPHYR study (NCT03600818) assessed the efficacy and safety of sarilumab (SAR), a fully human anti IL-6Rα monoclonal antibody, with a 14 week (wk) GC taper in patients with steroid resistant active PMR who flared on ≥7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent.

Methods

Patients were randomized (1:1) to 52 wks of treatment with SAR 200 mg every 2 wks (Q2W) + 14 wk GC tapered regimen (SAR arm) OR placebo Q2W + 52 wk GC tapered regimen (comparator arm). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving sustained remission at wk 52, defined as disease remission by wk 12, absence of disease flare, CRP normalization from wks 12 to 52 and adherence to the per protocol GC taper from wks 12 to 52.

Results

The study was terminated early due to protracted recruitment timelines during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in 118 of the intended 280 patients recruited between Oct 2018 and Jul 2020, and 117 were treated (SAR n=59, comparator n=58). The demographics were balanced; patients were primarily female, Caucasian, and a median age of ~70 years (Table 1). Overall, 78 patients completed the treatment (SAR n=42; comparator n=36). Primary reasons for treatment discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; SAR n=7, comparator n=4) and lack of efficacy (SAR n=4, comparator n=9). Sustained remission rate was significantly higher in the SAR arm vs the comparator arm (28.3% vs 10.3%; P=0.0193). Results of a sensitivity analysis excluding CRP from the sustained remission definition was consistent with the primary analysis (31.7% vs 13.8%; P=0.0280). All sustained remission components favored SAR (Figure 1). Patients in the SAR arm were 44% less likely to have a flare after achieving clinical remission vs the comparator arm (16.7% vs 29.3%; HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.35–0.90; P=0.0158). The comparator arm required more additional GCs vs the SAR arm, mainly due to PMR flare (median difference in actual and expected cumulative dose 199.5 mg vs 0.0 mg; P=0.0189). The cumulative GC toxicity index scores numerically favored SAR but the difference was not statistically significant. PMR activity scores improved in the SAR arm vs the comparator arm (LS mean -15.57 vs -10.27, nominal P=0.0002). Patient reported outcomes (eg, physical and mental health component scores, disability index, etc) favored SAR (Figure 1). Incidence of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) was numerically higher in the SAR arm vs the comparator arm (94.9% vs 84.5%) and included neutropenia (15.3%) and arthralgia (15.3%) in the SAR arm, and insomnia (15.5%) in the comparator arm. Conversely, the frequency of serious AEs was higher in the comparator arm vs the SAR arm (20.7% vs 13.6%). No deaths were reported.

Table 1.

Demographics and baseline characteristics

ParameterSAR + 14 wk GC taperPlacebo + 52 wk GC taper(n=60)(n=58)Age, median years (range)69 (51–88)70 (52–88)Sex (female), n (%)45 (75.0)37 (63.8)Race, n (%) Caucasian50 (83.3)48 (82.8) Asian1 (1.7)2 (3.4) Not reported9 (15.0)8 (13.8)PMR duration (diagnosis date to baseline),* median days (range)292 (78–3992)310 (66–2784)Any prior disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs, n (%) Methotrexate5 (8.3)10 (17.2) Leflunomide2 (3.3)1 (1.7) Azathioprine01 (1.7) Hydroxychloroquine1 (1.7)1 (1.7) Adalimumab1 (1.7)0 Tocilizumab01 (1.7)CRP (mg/L), median (range)6.8 (0.5–38.2)5.7 (0.1–62.3)Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h), median (range)25.0 (2.0–115.0)22.0 (5.0–85.0)

*SAR n = 54; comparator n= 50.

Conclusion

SAR + 14 wk GC taper demonstrated significant efficacy vs the comparator arm in steroid refractory PMR patients, including clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life. Safety was consistent with the known safety profile of SAR.

References

[1]Mori 2016;

[2]Akiyama 2020;

[3]Lally 2016,

[4]Devauchelle Pensec 2015

Acknowledgements

Medical writing support was provided by Vijay Kadasi of Sanofi and funded by Sanofi.

Disclosure of Interests

Bhaskar Dasgupta Consultant of: Sanofi, Roche Chugai, Speakers bureau: Roche Chugai, Cipla, Grant/research support from: Sanofi, Roche, Abbvie, Sebastian Unizony Consultant of: Sanofi, Kiniksa, Janssen, Grant/research support from: Genentech, Kenneth J Warrington Paid instructor for: Chemocentryx, Grant/research support from: Eli Lilly, Kiniksa, GSK, Jennifer Sloane Lazar Employee of: Sanofi, Angeliki Giannelou Shareholder of: Regeneron, Employee of: Regeneron, Chad Nivens Shareholder of: Regeneron, Employee of: Regeneron, Bolanle Akinlade Shareholder of: Regeneron, Employee of: Regeneron, Wanling Wong Employee of: Sanofi, Yong Lin Employee of: Sanofi, Frank Buttgereit Consultant of: Sanofi, Horizon Pharma, Roche, Galapagos, Abbvie, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Sanofi, Horizon Pharma, Roche, Galapagos, Abbvie, Novartis, Valerie Devauchelle-Pensec: None declared, Andrea Rubbert-Roth Consultant of: Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Sanofi, Roche, Robert Spiera Consultant of: Sanofi, GSK, Novartis, Chemocentryx, Roche-Genetech, Abbvie, Vera, Grant/research support from: GSK, Chemocentryx, Corbus, Inflarx, Boehringer Ingelheim

Efficacy and safety of mavrilimumab in giant cell arteritis: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Objectives

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is implicated in pathogenesis of giant cell arteritis. We evaluated the efficacy of the GM-CSF receptor antagonist mavrilimumab in maintaining disease remission.

Methods

This phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled patients with biopsy-confirmed or imaging-confirmed giant cell arteritis in 50 centres (North America, Europe, Australia). Active disease within 6 weeks of baseline was required for inclusion. Patients in glucocorticoid-induced remission were randomly assigned (3:2 ratio) to mavrilimumab 150 mg or placebo injected subcutaneously every 2 weeks. Both groups received a 26-week prednisone taper. The primary outcome was time to adjudicated flare by week 26. A prespecified secondary efficacy outcome was sustained remission at week 26 by Kaplan-Meier estimation. Safety was also assessed.

Results

Of 42 mavrilimumab recipients, flare occurred in 19% (n=8). Of 28 placebo recipients, flare occurred in 46% (n=13). Median time to flare (primary outcome) was 25.1 weeks in the placebo group, but the median was not reached in the mavrilimumab group (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.92; p=0.026). Sustained remission at week 26 was 83% for mavrilimumab and 50% for placebo recipients (p=0.0038). Adverse events occurred in 78.6% (n=33) of mavrilimumab and 89.3% (n=25) of placebo recipients. No deaths or vision loss occurred in either group.

Conclusions

Mavrilimumab plus 26 weeks of prednisone was superior to placebo plus 26 weeks of prednisone for time to flare by week 26 and sustained remission in patients with giant cell arteritis. Longer treatment is needed to determine response durability and quantify the glucocorticoid-sparing potential of mavrilimumab.

Trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03827018, Europe (EUdraCT number: 2018-001003-36), and Australia (CT-2018-CTN-01 865-1).

New-onset versus relapsing giant cell arteritis treated with tocilizumab: 3-year results from a randomized controlled trial and extension

Objective

Tocilizumab plus prednisone induces sustained glucocorticoid-free remission in patients with GCA. However, its long-term benefits in new-onset vs relapsing disease are uncertain, and the value of weekly vs every-other-week dosing has not been evaluated.

Methods

In Giant-Cell Arteritis Actemra (GiACTA) part 1, patients with new-onset or relapsing GCA received blinded tocilizumab weekly (TCZ QW), tocilizumab every-other-week (TCZ Q2W) or placebo for 52 weeks, with a prednisone taper. In part 2 (open-label), patients were treated at investigator discretion for 104 weeks. In this analysis, patients were evaluated according to their original treatment assignments, and outcomes beyond 52 weeks were assessed. Outcomes of interest included time to first flare and cumulative glucocorticoid exposure over 3 years according to baseline disease status.

Results

Part 1 enrolled 250 patients; 215 entered part 2. At baseline, 48% had new-onset disease and 52% had relapsing disease. In patients with new-onset and relapsing disease, the median time to first flare in the TCZ QW group was 577 and 575 days, respectively, vs 479 and 428 days with TCZ Q2W and 179 and 224 days with placebo; the median cumulative glucocorticoid dose was 3068 mg and 2191 mg with TCZ QW, 4080 mg and 2353 mg with TCZ Q2W, and 4639 mg and 6178 mg with placebo.

Conclusion

TCZ QW delayed the time to flare and reduced the cumulative glucocorticoid dose in patients with relapsing GCA and new-onset GCA. These data support initiating TCZ QW as part of first-line therapy in all patients with active GCA.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01791153.

Role of the halo sign in the assessment of giant cell arteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the halo sign in the assessment of GCA.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane central register databases up to August 2020. Studies informing on the sensitivity and specificity of the US halo sign for GCA (index test) were selected. Studies with a minimum of five participants were included. Study articles using clinical criteria, imaging such as PET-CT and/or temporal artery biopsy (TAB) as the reference standards were selected. Meta-analysis was conducted with a bivariate model.

Results

The initial search yielded 4023 studies. Twenty-three studies (patients n = 2711) met the inclusion criteria. Prospective (11 studies) and retrospective (12 studies) studies in academic and non-academic centres were included. Using clinical diagnosis as the standard (18 studies) yielded a pooled sensitivity of 67% (95% CI: 51, 80) and a specificity of 95% (95% CI: 89, 98%). This gave a positive and negative likelihood ratio for the diagnosis of GCA of 14.2 (95% CI: 5.7, 35.5) and 0.375 (95% CI: 0.22, 0.54), respectively. Using TAB as the standard (15 studies) yielded a pooled sensitivity of 63% (95% CI: 50, 75) and a specificity of 90% (95% CI: 81, 95).

Conclusion

The US halo sign is a sensitive and specific approach for GCA assessment and plays a pivotal role in diagnosis of GCA in routine clinical practice.

Registration

PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020202179.

Probability-based algorithm using ultrasound and additional tests for suspected GCA in a fast-track clinic

Objectives

Clinical presentations of giant cell arteritis (GCA) are protean, and it is vital to make a secure diagnosis and exclude mimics for urgent referrals with suspected GCA. The main objective was to develop a joined-up, end-to-end, fast-track confirmatory/exclusionary, algorithmic process based on a probability score triage to drive subsequent investigations with ultrasound (US) and any appropriate additional tests as required.

Methods

The algorithm was initiated by stratifying patients to low-risk category (LRC), intermediate-risk category (IRC) and high-risk category (HRC). Retrospective data was extracted from case records. The Southend pretest probability score (PTPS) overall showed a median score of 9 and a 75th percentile score of 12. We, therefore, classified LRC as PTPS <9, IRC 9–12 and HRC >12. GCA diagnosis was made by a combination of clinical, US, and laboratory findings. The algorithm was assessed in all referrals seen in 2018–2019 to test the diagnostic performance of US overall and in individual categories.

Results

Of 354 referrals, 89 had GCA with cases categorised as LRC (151), IRC (137) and HRC (66). 250 had US, whereas 104 did not (score <7, and/or high probability of alternative diagnoses). In HRC, US showed sensitivity 94%, specificity 85%, accuracy 92% and GCA prevalence 80%. In LRC, US showed sensitivity undefined (0/0), specificity 98%, accuracy 98% and GCA prevalence 0%. In IRC, US showed sensitivity 100%, specificity 97%, accuracy 98% and GCA prevalence 26%. In the total population, US showed sensitivity 97%, specificity 97% and accuracy 97%. Prevalence of GCA overall was 25%.

Conclusions

The Southend PTPS successfully stratifies fast-track clinic referrals and excludes mimics. The algorithm interprets US in context, clarifies a diagnostic approach and identifies uncertainty, need for re-evaluation and alternative tests. Test performance of US is significantly enhanced with PTPS.

Functional Outcome and Complications in Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures Operated with Proximal Humerus Locking Plate

Introduction:

Controversies exist in treatment of proximal humerus fractures as treatment options vary greatly from conservative management, closed pinning, stacked intramedullary nails, plating and hemi-arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to study the fracture patterns of each case and document the functional outcome and complications post-operative in the management of proximal humerus fractures operated with proximal humerus plate.

Material and Methods:

Thirty five patients with closed proximal humerus fractures, above 18 years old, admitted in our tertiary care hospital during the study period were enrolled. Patients underwent open reduction internal fixation with proximal humerus locking plate under general anaesthesia. Post-operative patients were assessed using Constant and DASH scores. Complications were recorded.

Results:

In our study the absolute Constant score of the study population increases at three months and six months and was found to be significant. Mean Constant score for 4-part fractures was 45.6 which were inferior as compared to 2-part and 3-part fractures (43.1 and 44.6, respectively). The mean Constant score at six months was 51.80 +/- 6.71. All three types of proximal humerus fractures showed significant improvement in the mean DASH score over our study period of six months and was found to be significant. Mean DASH score at six months was 27.97+/-12.84. Out of the 35 cases in the study two had complications. One had implant failure (Neer’s type 3, 60-year-old female) and one had varus collapse (Neer’s type 3, 45-year-old male).

Conclusion:

Due to angular stability and effective maintenance of the intraoperative fracture reduction during follow-up period, early post-operative mobilisation is possible which helps the patient to attain better shoulder range of motion and return to activity faster.

Reconstruction of Three-Dimensional Conformations of Bacterial ClpB from High-Speed Atomic-Force-Microscopy Images

ClpB belongs to the cellular disaggretase machinery involved in rescuing misfolded or aggregated proteins during heat or other cellular shocks. The function of this protein relies on the interconversion between different conformations in its native condition. A recent high-speed-atomic-force-microscopy (HS-AFM) experiment on ClpB from Thermus thermophilus shows four predominant conformational classes, namely, open, closed, spiral, and half-spiral. Analyses of AFM images provide only partial structural information regarding the molecular surface, and thus computational modeling of three-dimensional (3D) structures of these conformations should help interpret dynamical events related to ClpB functions. In this study, we reconstruct 3D models of ClpB from HS-AFM images in different conformational classes. We have applied our recently developed computational method based on a low-resolution representation of 3D structure using a Gaussian mixture model, combined with a Monte-Carlo sampling algorithm to optimize the agreement with target AFM images. After conformational sampling, we obtained models that reflect conformational variety embedded within the AFM images. From these reconstructed 3D models, we described, in terms of relative domain arrangement, the different types of ClpB oligomeric conformations observed by HS-AFM experiments. In particular, we highlighted the slippage of the monomeric components around the seam. This study demonstrates that such details of information, necessary for annotating the different conformational states involved in the ClpB function, can be obtained by combining HS-AFM images, even with limited resolution, and computational modeling.

POS0337 SOUTHEND PRE-TEST PROBABILITY SCORE AND HALO SCORE AS MARKERS FOR DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF GCA: EARLY RESULTS FROM THE PROSPECTIVE HAS-GCA STUDY

Background:

EULAR recommends doppler ultrasound (US) as the first line imaging in patients with Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) suspect. Traditionally, US non-compressive halo sign has been used for diagnosis but prospective studies on response and disease monitoring are lacking

Objectives:

The HAS GCA study has the objective of prospectively assessing role of US in diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring in newly diagnosed GCA. We report early baseline and up to month 3 data on our current recruitment in a study that has suffered disruption from the pandemic

Methods:

HAS GCA (IRAS#264294) is an ongoing, prospective, multicentre study recruiting from referrals of suspected GCA to fast track clinics. The objective is to recruit 270 patients, including 68 GCA patients. Based on the Southend GCA clinical pre-test probability score (SPTPS)1, patients were stratified in to low, intermediate and high risk categories2. Temporal and axillary US Halo Scores were calculated from the halo thickness and extent in bilateral temporal arteries, parietal and frontal branches and axillary arteries. These individual scores were summed (TA Halo Score x1 plus; AA Halo Score x3) to generate a Total Halo Score (THS)3.

Mann Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare baseline features between GCA and controls. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate disease features at baseline and at 3 months in GCA patients. Sensitivity (Sn) and Specificity (Sp) were calculated, where applicable. P value <0.05 is statistically significant

Results:

Ninety-three patients (29 GCA, 64 controls) have been recruited thus far: 18 completed 3-month follow up assessment; 4 were lost to follow up (2 died, 2 withdrew consent due to pandemic). Demographics, clinical features, and US results are shown (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline features of GCA patients and controls.

GCA (n=29)Controls (n=64)P-valueAge, median (IQR)75 (71-80)67 (61.25 – 75.0)0.001Female, n (%)15 (42)50 (78)0.01SPTPS category, n (%) Low risk0 (0)31 (48)<0.001 Intermediate risk7 (24)25 (39)0.24 High risk22 (76)8 (13)<0.001Halo score (HS), median (range) Temporal artery HS10 (1-21)1 (0-9)<0.001 Axillary artery HS12 (0-18)6 (0-18)<0.001 Total HS21 (2-38)6 (0-19)<0.001Clinical features, n (%) Temporal headache21 (72)40 (63)0.48 Scalp tenderness17 (59)31 (48)0.38 Jaw claudication19 (66)4 (6)<0.001 PMR symptoms16 (55)6 (9)<0.001 Constitutional symptoms17 (59)18 (28)0.006 Visual disturbance18 (62)38 (59)1 Vision loss7 (24)4 (6)0.03

Among GCA patients, 23 had cranial, 2 large-vessel and 4 mixed phenotypes (cranial plus large vessel) disease.

Jaw claudication (66%) and polymyalgic symptoms (55%) were the dominant features in GCA patients. Median age 75 years in GCA (42% females) and 67 years in controls (78% females). GCA and controls were stratified by SPTPS to Low risk (0% vs 48%; Sn-undefined, Sp-97), Intermediate risk (24% vs 39%; Sn-100, Sp-100) and High risk (76% vs 13%; Sn-95, Sp-88). Optimal SPTPS cut-off point was ≥12 (Sn-93, Sp-86); ≥10 (Sn-100 & Sp-69).

Median THS was 21 in GCA and 6 in controls. Optimal cut-off Halo Score in diagnosis was TAHS ≥5 (Sn-90, Sp-98), AAHS ≥11 (Sn-55, Sp-80), THS ≥18 (Sn-72%, Sp-98%). Among the 18 patients who completed 3-months follow up, median TAHS, AAHS and THS reduced from 10 to 2.5, 12 to 6 and 21 to 10, respectively (Figure 1).

Conclusion:

Along with SPTPS, Halo Score successfully discriminates GCA from non GCA mimics. HS is effective in showing 3-month response and may be a useful marker to monitor GCA disease activity.

References:

[1]Laskou F et al. A probability score to aid the diagnosis of suspected giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019

[2]Sebastian A et al. Probability-based algorithm using ultrasound and additional tests for suspected GCA in a fast-track clinic. RMD Open. 2020

[3]Sebastian A et al. Halo score (temporal artery, its branches and axillary artery) as a diagnostic, prognostic and disease monitoring tool for Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA). BMC Rheumatol. 2020

Disclosure of Interests:

Alwin Sebastian: None declared, Alessandro Tomelleri: None declared, Abdul Kayani: None declared, Mohammad Tariq: None declared, Diana Prieto-Peña: None declared, Sue Inness: None declared, Jo Jackson: None declared, Kornelis van der Geest Speakers bureau: Roche, Bhaskar Dasgupta Speakers bureau: Roche, GSK, BMS, Sanofi, Abbie, Grant/research support from: Roche

AB0370 UTILITY OF CRP AND ESR IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF GIANT CELL ARTERITIS RELAPSE IN A PHASE 2 TRIAL OF MAVRILIMUMAB

Background:

No universally accepted definition of flare currently exists in giant cell arteritis (GCA). Although relapses are defined mostly on clinical grounds (recurrence of GCA-related signs/symptoms), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) help clinicians assess disease activity. In fact, >70% of patients on glucocorticoids (GCs) alone have increased CRP or ESR when the disease is active. In contrast, tocilizumab, given its IL-6-blockade effect in the liver, rapidly reduces CRP and ESR levels, rendering them unreliable for disease activity monitoring. Mavrilimumab – a GM-CSF receptor α inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in a Phase 2 GCA trial1 – downregulates inflammation upstream of IL-6. We hypothesized that mavrilimumab would not interfere with the utility of CRP and ESR in monitoring disease activity and in identifying GCA relapse.

Objectives:

To analyze the relationship between CRP/ESR and clinical disease activity in GCA patients treated with mavrilimumab.

Methods:

New-onset and relapsing GCA patients with active disease were recruited. GC-induced remission (no GCA symptoms and CRP <1 mg/dL or ESR <20 mm/hr) was required by baseline. Patients were randomized 3:2 to mavrilimumab 150 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks plus a protocol-defined 26-week prednisone taper. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to relapse by Week 26. Relapse (adjudicated) was defined as recurrent GCA-related signs/symptoms, including new/worsening vasculitis on imaging, concurrent with CRP ≥1 mg/dL and/or ESR ≥30 mm/hr. CRP and ESR were also measured periodically during the trial.

This post hoc analysis assessed the association of recurrent GCA-related signs/symptoms with concurrent CRP or ESR elevation post-randomization by treatment arm. We also assessed the proportion of patients with CRP or ESR elevation without GCA-related signs/symptoms up to Week 26.

Results:

Seventy patients were enrolled (mavrilimumab, N=42; placebo, N=28). The association of CRP or ESR elevation with unequivocal GCA-related signs/symptoms post-randomization was consistent regardless of treatment arm: 8/8 in the mavrilimumab group and 13/13 in the placebo group (Table 1). During relapse, median (range) CRP was 1.8 (1.4 – 8.4) mg/dL (mavrilimumab group) and 1.8 (1.1 – 9.0) mg/dL (placebo group). Corresponding ESR values were 39.5 (30 – 102) mm/hr (mavrilimumab group) and 49 (31 – 101) mm/hr (placebo group). Four mavrilimumab recipients had self-limited, equivocal GCA-related signs/symptoms without concurrent CRP or ESR elevation; all 4 completed the prespecified GC taper by Week 26 without need for rescue GCs, so relapse was not confirmed. At least 1 elevated CRP or ESR value in the absence of GCA-related signs/symptoms was observed in 58.8% of mavrilimumab recipients and 93.3% of placebo recipients by Week 26.

Conclusion:

The observed association of CRP or ESR elevation with GCA-related signs/symptoms is consistent with the upstream mechanism and supports the utility of the stringent protocol definition of relapse. The frequency and magnitude of CRP and ESR elevations at relapse were similar in both treatment groups, suggesting that CRP and ESR remain useful in assessments of disease activity in mavrilimumab-treated patients. CRP and ESR elevations without GCA-related signs/symptoms occurred more often in placebo recipients.

References:

[1]Cid, Unizony et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10)

Table 1.

CRP and ESR levels in patients with or without GCA relapse

Assessment§MavrilimumabPlaceboMavrilimumabPlaceboN=42N=28N=42N=28With RelapseWithout Relapse# of patients8 (19.1)13 (46.4)34 (81.0)15 (53.6) Elevated CRP* or ESR†8 (100.0)13 (100.0)20 (58.8)14 (93.3)  Elevated CRP*7 (87.5)10 (76.9)10 (29.4)11 (73.3)   Median (range) mg/dL1.8 (1.4 - 8.4)1.8 (1.1 - 9.0)2.6 (1.3 – 7.0)2.0 (1.0 – 6.6) Elevated ESR†6 (75.0)9 (69.2)16 (47.1)10 (66.7)  Median (range) mm/hr39.5 (30 - 102)49.0 (31 - 101)41.5 (30 - 110)53.5 (30 - 82)

§# (%), except where indicated otherwise.

*CRP ≥ 1 mg/dL

†ESR ≥ 30 mm/hr

Disclosure of Interests:

Sebastian Unizony Consultant of: Janssen and Kiniksa, Grant/research support from: Genentech, Maria C. Cid Speakers bureau: Roche and Kiniksa, Paid instructor for: GSK and Vifor, Consultant of: Janssen, GSK, and Abbvie, Grant/research support from: Kiniksa, Elisabeth Brouwer Speakers bureau: Dr. E.Brouwer as an employee of the UMCG received speaker fees and consulting fees from Roche in 2017 2018 which were paid to the UMCG., Consultant of: Dr. E.Brouwer as an employee of the UMCG received speaker fees and consulting fees from Roche in 2017 2018 which were paid to the UMCG., Lorenzo Dagna Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Glaxo SmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Glaxo SmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI; clinical trial for Kiniksa, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, Merk Sharp &Dohme, Janssen, Kiniksa, Bhaskar Dasgupta Paid instructor for: Educational grant symposium/workshop for Roche-chugai, Sanofi, and Abbvie, Consultant of: CI UK for the Kiniksa trial, Grant/research support from: Educational grant symposium/workshop for Roche-chugai, Sanofi, and Abbvie, Bernhard Hellmich Consultant of: Honoraria paid to the institution for participation in the clinical trial, Eamonn Molloy: None declared, Carlo Salvarani: None declared, Bruce C. Trapnell Consultant of: Consultant member of DSMB for Kiniksa., Kenneth J Warrington Consultant of: Clinical trial support from Eli Lilly and Kiniksa, Ian Wicks: None declared, Manoj Samant Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Teresa Zhou Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Lara Pupim Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, John F. Paolini Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals

OMERACT definition and reliability assessment of chronic ultrasound lesions of the axillary artery in giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVES

To define chronic ultrasound lesions of the axillary artery (AA) in long-standing giant cell arteritis (GCA) and to evaluate the reliability of the new ultrasound definition in a web-based exercise.

METHODS

A structured Delphi, involving an expert panel of the Large Vessel Vasculitis subgroup of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Ultrasound Working Group was carried out. The reliability of the new definition was tested in a 2-round web-based exercise involving 23 experts and using 50 still images each from AA of long-standing and acute GCA patients, as well as 50 images from healthy individuals.

RESULTS

The final OMERACT ultrasound definition of chronic changes was based on measurement and appearance of the intima-media complex. The overall reliability of the new definition for chronic ultrasound changes in longstanding GCA of the AA was good to excellent with Light's kappa values of 0.79-0.80 for inter-reader reliability and mean Light's-kappa of 0.88 for intra-reader reliability. The mean inter-rater and intra-rater agreements were 86-87% and 92%, respectively. Good reliabilities were observed comparing the vessels with longstanding versus acute GCA with a mean agreement and kappa values of 81% and 0.63, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The new OMERACT ultrasound definition for chronic vasculitis of the AA in GCA revealed a good to excellent inter- and intra-reader reliability in a web-based exercise of experts.

Long-term effect of tocilizumab in patients with giant cell arteritis: open-label extension phase of the Giant Cell Arteritis Actemra (GiACTA) trial

BACKGROUND

The combination of tocilizumab plus a glucocorticoid taper is effective in maintaining clinical remission without requiring additional glucocorticoid therapy in patients with giant cell arteritis, as shown in part one of the Giant Cell Arteritis Actemra (GiACTA) trial. However, the duration of the tocilizumab effect after discontinuation is unknown. Here, we explored the maintenance of efficacy 1 year after discontinuation of tocilizumab treatment, the effectiveness of retreatment with tocilizumab after relapse, and the long-term glucocorticoid-sparing effect of tocilizumab.

METHODS

In part one of the GiACTA trial, 251 patients were randomly assigned (2:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous tocilizumab (162 mg) once a week or every other week, combined with a 26-week prednisone taper, or placebo combined with a prednisone taper over a period of either 26 weeks or 52 weeks. Patients in clinical remission stopped masked injections at 1 year (the conclusion of part one). In part two, treatment was at the investigators' discretion and could consist of no treatment, tocilizumab, glucocorticoids, methotrexate, or combinations of these, for two years. Maintenance of efficacy as assessed by clinical remission (defined as absence of relapse determined by the investigator), cumulative glucocorticoid dose, and long-term safety were exploratory objectives in part two of the trial. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01791153.

FINDINGS

215 patients participated in part two of the trial; 81 patients who were randomly assigned to tocilizumab once a week in part one were in clinical remission after 1 year, of whom 59 started part two on no treatment. 25 of these 59 patients (42%) maintained tocilizumab-free and glucocorticoid-free clinical remission throughout part two. Median (95% CI) cumulative glucocorticoid doses over 3 years were 2647 mg (1987-3507) for tocilizumab once a week, 3948 mg (2352-5186) for tocilizumab-every-other-week, 5277 mg (3944-6685) for placebo with a 26-week prednisone taper, and 5323 mg (3900-6951) for placebo with a 52-week prednisone taper (van Elteren p≤0·001, tocilizumab once a week vs placebo groups; p<0·05, tocilizumab-every-other-week vs placebo groups). Tocilizumab-based regimens restored clinical remission among patients who experienced relapse in part two and were treated (median time to remission: 15 days for tocilizumab alone [n=17]; 16 days for tocilizumab plus glucocorticoids [n=36]; and 54 days for glucocorticoids alone [n=27]). No new or unexpected safety findings were reported over the full 3 years of the study.

INTERPRETATION

Giant cell arteritis remains a chronic disease that entails ongoing management and careful vigilance for disease relapse, but continuous indefinite treatment with immunosuppressive drugs is not required for all patients. A substantial proportion of patients treated with tocilizumab for one year maintain drug-free remission during the two years after tocilizumab cessation. For patients who experience relapse, tocilizumab can be used to manage relapses, but it remains prudent to include prednisone for patients who experience relapse because of the risk for vision loss.

FUNDING

F Hoffmann-La Roche.

P021 Rheumatology shielded patients, hospitalised COVID-19 and outcomes in Essex: an audit across Mid and South Essex and Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trusts

Background/Aims 

Shielding measures were implemented within the United Kingdom in an attempt to slow the rate of COVID-19 infections, with shielding letters being sent to extremely vulnerable patients. This included rheumatology patients on immunosuppressive therapies sufficient to increase their risk of infection.

Methods 

This was a retrospective audit assessing the number of rheumatology patients within the Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust (MSE Trust) and Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Trust (BHR Trust) who were sent shielding letters. We audited how effective these measures were in preventing COVID-19 infection during the shielding period (up to 1^st July 2020). Risk criteria from NHS Digital and the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) were used by individual departments within these Trusts to identify the relevant patients. We audited from case records demographic details, rheumatological diagnoses, therapies and associated co-morbidities in these patients.

Results 

A total of 5,876 high risk patients within these Trusts were identified and sent shielding letters: 4,914 within the MSE Trust and 962 patients within the BHR Trust. As seen in Table 1, of these 5,876 patients, 28 (0.48%) were hospitalised with positive tests for COVID-19: 23 of the 4,914 (0.47%) in MSE Trust and 5 of the 962 (0.52%) in BHR Trust. Of the 28 COVID-19 admissions, 10 died (36%). The number of rheumatology patients that developed COVID-19 as a proportion of all patients admitted across these two Trusts was 0.76% (28 out of 3,695). P021 Table 1:

Rituximab versus tocilizumab in anti-TNF inadequate responder patients with rheumatoid arthritis (R4RA): 16-week outcomes of a stratified, biopsy-driven, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Although targeted biological treatments have transformed the outlook for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 40% of patients show poor clinical response, which is mechanistically still unexplained. Because more than 50% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis have low or absent CD20 B cells-the target for rituximab-in the main disease tissue (joint synovium), we hypothesised that, in these patients, the IL-6 receptor inhibitor tocilizumab would be more effective. The aim of this trial was to compare the effect of tocilizumab with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) stratified for synovial B-cell status.

METHODS

This study was a 48-week, biopsy-driven, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 randomised controlled trial (rituximab vs tocilizumab in anti-TNF inadequate responder patients with rheumatoid arthritis; R4RA) done in 19 centres across five European countries (the UK, Belgium, Italy, Portugal, and Spain). Patients aged 18 years or older who fulfilled the 2010 American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and were eligible for treatment with rituximab therapy according to UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines were eligible for inclusion in the trial. To inform balanced stratification, following a baseline synovial biopsy, patients were classified histologically as B-cell poor or rich. Patients were then randomly assigned (1:1) centrally in block sizes of six and four to receive two 1000 mg rituximab infusions at an interval of 2 weeks (rituximab group) or 8 mg/kg tocilizumab infusions at 4-week intervals (tocilizumab group). To enhance the accuracy of the stratification of B-cell poor and B-cell rich patients, baseline synovial biopsies from all participants were subjected to RNA sequencing and reclassified by B-cell molecular signature. The study was powered to test the superiority of tocilizumab over rituximab in the B-cell poor population at 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was defined as a 50% improvement in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI50%) from baseline. The trial is registered on the ISRCTN database, ISRCTN97443826, and EudraCT, 2012-002535-28.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 28, 2013, and Jan 17, 2019, 164 patients were classified histologically and were randomly assigned to the rituximab group (83 [51%]) or the tocilizumab group (81 [49%]). In patients histologically classified as B-cell poor, there was no statistically significant difference in CDAI50% between the rituximab group (17 [45%] of 38 patients) and the tocilizumab group (23 [56%] of 41 patients; difference 11% [95% CI -11 to 33], p=0·31). However, in the synovial biopsies classified as B-cell poor with RNA sequencing the tocilizumab group had a significantly higher response rate compared with the rituximab group for CDAI50% (rituximab group 12 [36%] of 33 patients vs tocilizumab group 20 [63%] of 32 patients; difference 26% [2 to 50], p=0·035). Occurrence of adverse events (rituximab group 76 [70%] of 108 patients vs tocilizumab group 94 [80%] of 117 patients; difference 10% [-1 to 21) and serious adverse events (rituximab group 8 [7%] of 108 vs tocilizumab group 12 [10%] of 117; difference 3% [-5 to 10]) were not significantly different between treatment groups.

INTERPRETATION

The results suggest that RNA sequencing-based stratification of rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissue showed stronger associations with clinical responses compared with histopathological classification. Additionally, for patients with low or absent B-cell lineage expression signature in synovial tissue tocilizumab is more effective than rituximab. Replication of the results and validation of the RNA sequencing-based classification in independent cohorts is required before making treatment recommendations for clinical practice.

FUNDING

Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme from the UK National Institute for Health Research.

The impact of disease extent and severity detected by quantitative ultrasound analysis in the diagnosis and outcome of giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVES

To develop a quantitative score based on colour duplex sonography (CDS) to predict the diagnosis and outcome of GCA.

METHODS

We selected patients with positive CDS and confirmed diagnosis of GCA recruited into the TA Biopsy (TAB) vs Ultrasound in Diagnosis of GCA (TABUL) study and in a validation, independent cohort. We fitted four CDS models including combinations of the following: number and distribution of halos at the TA branches, average and maximum intima-media thickness of TA and axillary arteries. We fitted four clinical/laboratory models. The combined CDS and clinical models were used to develop a score to predict risk of positive TAB and clinical outcome at 6 months.

RESULTS

We included 135 GCA patients from TABUL (female: 68%, age 73 (8) years) and 72 patients from the independent cohort (female: 46%, age 75 (7) years). The best-fitting CDS model for TAB used maximum intima-media thickness size and bilaterality of TA and axillary arteries' halos. The best-fitting clinical model included raised inflammatory markers, PMR, headache and ischaemic symptoms. By combining CDS and clinical models we derived a score to compute the probability of a positive TAB. Model discrimination was fair (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.77, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.84). No significant association was found for prediction of clinical outcome at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

A quantitative analysis of CDS and clinical characteristics is useful to identify patients with a positive biopsy, supporting the use of CDS as a surrogate tool to replace TAB. No predictive role was found for worse prognosis.

Ultrasonographic Halo Score in giant cell arteritis: association with intimal hyperplasia and ischaemic sight loss

Objectives

We investigated the relationship between the ultrasonographic Halo Score and temporal artery biopsy (TAB) findings in GCA.

Methods

This is a prospective study including 90 patients suspected of having GCA. Ultrasonography of temporal/axillary arteries and a TAB were obtained in all patients at baseline. An experienced pathologist evaluated whether TAB findings were consistent with GCA, and whether transmural inflammation, giant cells and intimal hyperplasia were present. Ultrasonographic Halo Scores were determined. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed.

Results

Twenty-seven patients had a positive TAB, while 32 patients with a negative TAB received a clinical diagnosis of GCA after 6 months of follow-up. Patients with a positive TAB showed higher Halo Scores than patients with a negative TAB. The presence of intimal hyperplasia in the biopsy, rather than the presence of transmural inflammation or giant cells, was associated with elevated Halo Scores in patients with GCA. The Halo Score discriminated well between TAB-positive patients with and without intimal hyperplasia, as indicated by an area under the curve of 0.82 in the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Patients with a positive TAB and intimal hyperplasia more frequently presented with ocular ischaemia (40%) than the other patients with GCA (13–14%).

Conclusion

The ultrasonographic Halo Score may help to identify a subset of GCA patients with intimal hyperplasia, a TAB feature associated with ischaemic sight loss.

Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis: a single centre NHS experience using imaging (ultrasound and PET-CT) as a diagnostic and monitoring tool

Tocilizumab (TCZ), an IL-6 receptor blocker, is approved for relapsing, refractory giant cell arteritis (GCA). We report real-life clinical experience with TCZ in GCA including assessment of responses on imaging (ultrasound (US) and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-computed Tomography (¹⁸FDG-PET-CT)) during the first year of treatment. We included 22 consecutive patients with GCA treated with TCZ where EULAR core data set on disease activity, quality of life (QoL) and treatment-related complications were collected. Pre-TCZ US and ¹⁸FDG-PET/CT findings were available for 21 and 4 patients, respectively, where we determined the effect on US halo thickness, temporal and axillary artery Southend Halo Score and Total Vascular Score on ¹⁸FDG-PET-CT. The 22 patients with GCA (10 cranial, 10 large vessel, 2 both) had a median disease duration of 58.5 (range, 1-370) weeks prior to initiation of TCZ. Half had used prior conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARDs). TCZ was initiated for refractory (50%), ischaemic (36%) or relapsing (14%) disease. Median follow-up was 43 (12-52) weeks. TCZ was discontinued due to serious adverse events (SAEs) in two patients. On treatment with TCZ, 4 discontinued prednisolone, 11 required doses ≤2.5 mg, 2 required daily dose of 2.5-5 mg and 5 needed prednisolones ≥5 mg daily. QoL improved by 50%. Total US halo thickness decreased in 38 arterial segments, median temporal artery Halo Score decreased from 11 to 0, axillary artery Halo Score remained stable. Median Total Vascular Score on FDG-PET/CT reduced from 11.5 to 6.5. In our experience, TCZ showed an excellent response with acceptable safety in GCA, with improvement on US and FDG-PET/CT imaging.

Halo score (temporal artery, its branches and axillary artery) as a diagnostic, prognostic and disease monitoring tool for Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA)

BACKGROUND

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a common large vessel vasculitis of the elderly, often associated with sight loss. Glucocorticoids (GC remain the mainstay of treatment, although biologic treatments have been approved. Biomarkers predicting disease severity, relapse rates and damage are lacking in GCA.EULAR recommends ultrasound (US) as the first investigation for suspected GCA. The cardinal US finding, a non-compressible halo, is currently categorised as either negative or positive. However, the extent and severity of this finding may vary.In this study, we hypothesise whether the extent and severity of the halo sign [calculated as a single composite Halo score (HS)] of temporal and axillary arteries may be of diagnostic, prognostic and monitoring importance; whether baseline HS is linked to disease outcomes, relapses and damage; whether HS can stratify GCA patients for individual treatment needs; whether HS can function as an objective monitoring tool during follow up.

METHODS

This is a prospective, observational study. Suspected GCA Participants will be selected from the GCA FTC at the participating centres in the UK. Informed consent will be obtained, and patients managed as part of standard care. Patients with GCA will have HS (temporal and axillary arteries) measured at baseline and months 1,3,6 and 12 long with routine clinical assessments, blood sampling and patient-reported outcomes (EQ5D). Non-GCA patients will be discharged back to the referral team and will have a telephone interview in 6 months.We aim to recruit 272 suspected GCA referrals which should yield 68 patients (25% of referrals) with confirmed GCA. The recruitment will be completed in 1 year with an estimated total study period of 24 months.

DISCUSSION

The identification of prognostic factors in GCA is both timely and needed. A prognostic marker, such as the HS, could help to stratify GCA patients for an appropriate treatment regimen. Tocilizumab, an IL-6R blocking agent, switches off the acute phase response (C-Reactive Protein), making it difficult to measure the disease activity. Therefore, an independent HS, and changes in that score during treatment and follow-up, maybe a more objective measure of response compare to patient-reported symptoms and clinical assessment alone.