Jiemy WF, van Sleen Y, van der Geest KS, Ten Berge HA, Abdulahad WH, Sandovici M, Boots AM, Heeringa P, Brouwer E. Distinct macrophage phenotypes skewed by local granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) are associated with tissue destruction and intimal hyperplasia in giant cell arteritis.
Clin Transl Immunology 2020;
9:e1164. [PMID:
32884747 PMCID:
PMC7453134 DOI:
10.1002/cti2.1164]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective
To determine the presence and spatial distribution of different macrophage phenotypes, governed by granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) and macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) skewing signals, in giant cell arteritis (GCA) lesions.
Methods
Temporal artery biopsies (TABs, n = 11) from treatment‐naive GCA patients, aorta samples from GCA‐related aneurysms (n = 10) and atherosclerosis (n = 10) were stained by immunohistochemistry targeting selected macrophage phenotypic markers, cytokines, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and growth factors. In vitro macrophage differentiation (n = 10) followed by flow cytometry, Luminex assay and ELISA were performed to assess whether GM‐CSF and M‐CSF are drivers of macrophage phenotypic heterogeneity.
Results
A distinct spatial distribution pattern of macrophage phenotypes in TABs was identified. CD206+/MMP‐9+ macrophages were located at the site of tissue destruction, whereas FRβ+ macrophages were located in the inner intima of arteries with high degrees of intimal hyperplasia. Notably, this pattern was also observed in macrophage‐rich areas in GCA aortas but not in atherosclerotic aortas. Flow cytometry showed that GM‐CSF treatment highly upregulated CD206 expression, while FRβ was expressed by M‐CSF‐skewed macrophages, only. Furthermore, localised expression of GM‐CSF and M‐CSF was detected, likely contributing to macrophage heterogeneity in the vascular wall.
Conclusions
Our data document a distinct spatial distribution pattern of CD206+/MMP‐9+ macrophages and FRβ+ macrophages in GCA linked to tissue destruction and intimal proliferation, respectively. We suggest that these distinct macrophage phenotypes are skewed by sequential GM‐CSF and M‐CSF signals. Our study adds to a better understanding of the development and functional role of macrophage phenotypes in the pathogenesis of GCA and opens opportunities for the design of macrophage‐targeted therapies.
Collapse