Effect of primer-cement systems with different functional phosphate monomers on the adhesion of zirconia to dentin

Clinical Performance of Minimally Invasive Monolithic Ultratranslucent Zirconia Veneers: A Case Series up to Five Years of Follow-up

There is a lack of reports in the literature on the long-term clinical performance of ultratranslucent zirconia, especially considering its use in manufacturing monolithic veneers. The purpose of this case series is to describe the aesthetic treatment steps of three patients with minimally invasive ultratranslucent zirconia veneers and to report the clinical findings up to five years. Three patients (woman: 2, man: 1; mean age: 30 years) unsatisfied with their dental aesthetics sought dental treatment. The treatment plan involved cementing ultratranslucent zirconia veneers. Air-abrasion was performed on the internal surface of zirconia with alumina particles coated by silica (silicatization), followed by silane and adhesive applications for the adhesive cementation. All veneers were adhesively cemented to enamel with resin cement (Variolink Esthetic, Ivoclar). The patients were clinically evaluated annually considering the Ryge modified/ California Dental Association criteria. After a mean follow-up of 4.33 years (4-5 years), a survival rate of 100% was detected for the 28 minimally invasive ultratranslucent zirconia veneers cemented in the 3 patients. There were no absolute failures such as debonding, veneer fracture, or secondary caries. Superficial marginal discoloration was observed in one element (maxillary left lateral incisor) of one patient. Ultratranslucent zirconia is a viable option for manufacturing veneers due to its excellent clinical performance and longevity. However, further long-term clinical studies are essential to consolidate this material as an option for esthetic restorations.

[Adhesion of dental cements to zirconia restorations. Part 2]

The information about methods of surface preparation for dentures made from ceramic based on zirconium dioxide for better adhesive fixation is presented in the first part of this article. Micromechanical methods of preparation for cementation of the surface of a zirconia dental prosthesis are discussed in the first part of this article. The second part of the article provides an overview of scientific research on chemical methods for preparing a surface made of zirconia and the problem of the bond strength of polymer cement with a prepared surface made of zirconia.

The One-Year In Vivo Comparison of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Dioxide Inlays

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the one-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate (LD) and zirconium dioxide (ZrO₂) class II inlay restorations. Thirty healthy individuals who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled for the study. The patients were randomly divided into two study groups (n = 15): LD (IPS e.max press) and ZrO₂ (Dentcare Zirconia). In the ZrO₂ group, the internal surfaces of the inlays were sandblasted and silanized with Monobond N (Ivoclar, Leichsteistein, Germany). In the LD group, the internal surfaces of the inlays were etched with 5% hydrofluoric acid. The ceramic inlays were cemented with self-cure resin cement (Multilink N). Clinical examinations were performed using modified United State Public Health Codes and Criteria (USPHS) after 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. The one-year survival rate was evaluated. In total, one failure was observed in the ZrO₂ group. The survival probability after 1 year for the ZrO₂ inlays was 93%, and for the LD inlays was 100%, which was statistically insignificant. The differences between both groups for most USPHS criteria (except for colour match) were statistically insignificant. Within the imitations of the present study, the lithium disilicate- and zirconia dioxide-based inlays exhibited comparable clinical performances. However, the colour and translucency match was superior for the lithium disilicate restorations.

Bond durability when applying phosphate ester monomer-containing primers vs. self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia: Evaluation after different aging conditions

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate bond durability when applying 2 phosphate ester monomer-containing self-adhesive resin cements alone, versus a combination of phosphate ester monomer-containing primer conditioning plus 2 conventional resin cements requiring primers, to zirconia after different artificial aging methods.

METHODS

We cemented air-abraded zirconia plates to composite resin cylinders with self-adhesive resin cements (MS; RU) alone or cemented them with traditional resin cements (ZRV; ZVN) after pre-conditioning with a zirconia primer. A shear bond strength (SBS) test were performed after subjecting them to 19 different aging conditions (n = 15) comprising 30,000× thermocycles, air storage at room temperature (RT), water storage at RT, or at 37 °C for 24 h, 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Zirconia powders mixed with zirconia primer or 2 self-adhesive resin cements were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.

RESULTS

Groups MS and ZVN obtained the highest SBS after all of aging methods. SBS after 6 months of storage was similar to SBS after 24 h of storage, while both were higher than SBS after 1 year of storage. Water storage at 37 °C provided higher SBS than RT water storage did. We detected a Zr-O-P bond in both self-adhesive resin cement/zirconia powder mixtures.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of self-adhesive resin cements alone could be an alternative to pre-conditioning with a zirconia primer followed by the application of conventional resin cements. Formation of Zr-O-P bonds contributed to the bonding improvement of self-adhesive resin cements. Different aging conditions affected SBS values.

Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Current Conditioning Methods and Bonding Materials

Background. Reliable bonding between resin composite cements and high strength ceramics is difficult to achieve because of their chemical inertness and lack of silica content that makes etching impossible. The purpose of this review is to classify and analyze the existing methods and materials suggested to improve the adhesion of zirconia to dental substrate by using composite resins, in order to explore current trends in surface conditioning methods with predictable results. Methods. The current literature, examining the bond strength of zirconia ceramics, and including in vitro studies, clinical studies, and a systematic review, was analyzed. The research in the literature was carried out using PubMed and Cochrane Library databases, only papers in English, published online from 2013 to 2018. The following keywords and their combinations were used: Zirconia, 3Y-TZP, Adhesion, Adhesive cementation, Bonding, Resin, Composite resin, Composite material, Dentin, Enamel. Results. Research, in PubMed and Cochrane Library databases, provided 390 titles with abstracts. From these, a total of 93 publications were chosen for analysis. After a full text evaluation, seven articles were discarded. Therefore, the final sample was 86, including in vitro, clinical studies, and one systematic review. Various adhesive techniques with different testing methods were examined. Conclusions. Airborne-particle abrasion and tribo-chemical silica coating are the pre-treatment methods with more evidence in the literature. Increased adhesion could be expected after physico-chemical conditioning of zirconia. Surface contamination has a negative effect on adhesion. There is no evidence to support a universal adhesion protocol.

The effect of air-particle abrasion and a zirconia primer application on resin cement bonding strength to zirconia

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of surface treatments on the bond strength between a zirconia-based ceramic and two resin cements.

METHODS

Eighty blocks (5.25×3.74×4.5 mm) of a zirconia-based ceramic were divided into eight groups (N.=10) according to the factors "surface treatment" (air-particle abrasion with Al2O3 or Al2O3/SiO2 and zirconia primer) and "cement" (conventional resin cement and self-adhesive resin cement). After the surface treatments, cylinders of each resin cement (Ø=3.5 mm, height: 3 mm) were built up on the zirconia surface and photo-activated (40 s). The samples were stored in water for 30 days at 37 °C, followed by shear bond strength test in a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey test (α=0.05).

RESULTS

Regarding the surface treatments, all strategies were statistically different from each other. The Cojet achieved the higher bond strength values, followed by Signum Zirconia Bond. The resin cements were also statistically different from each other, since the U200 achieved higher bond strength values. The interaction between the factors was also significant. Most of the failures were adhesive and mixed.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the cement used, the air-particle abrasion with alumina coated by silica particles improved bond strength.