Implicit and explicit finite element models predict the mechanical response of calcium phosphate-titanium cranial implants

The efficacy of femoral augmentation for hip fracture prevention using ceramic-based cements: A preliminary experimentally-driven finite element investigation

Femoral fractures due to sideways falls continue to be a major cause of concern for the elderly. Existing approaches for the prevention of these injuries have limited efficacy. Prophylactic femoral augmentation systems, particularly those involving the injection of ceramic-based bone cements, are gaining more attention as a potential alternative preventative approach. We evaluated the mechanical effectiveness of three variations of a bone cement injection pattern (basic ellipsoid, hollow ellipsoid, small ellipsoid) utilizing finite element simulations of sideways fall impacts. The basic augmentation pattern was tested with both high- and low-strength ceramic-based cements. The cement patterns were added to the finite element models (FEMs) of five cadaveric femurs, which were then subject to simulated sideways falls at seven impact velocities ranging from 1.0 m/s to 4.0 m/s. Peak impact forces and peak acetabular forces were examined, and failure was evaluated using a strain-based criterion. We found that the basic HA ellipsoid provided the highest increases in both the force at the acetabulum of the impacted femur ("acetabular force", 55.0% ± 22.0%) and at the force plate ("impact force", 37.4% ± 15.8%). Changing the cement to a weaker material, brushite, resulted in reduced strengthening of the femur (45.2% ± 19.4% acetabular and 30.4% ± 13.0% impact). Using a hollow version of the ellipsoid appeared to have no effect on the fracture outcome and only a minor effect on the other metrics (54.1% ± 22.3% acetabular force increase and 35.3% ± 16.0% impact force increase). However, when the outer two layers of the ellipsoid were removed (small ellipsoid), the force increases that were achieved were only 9.8% ± 5.5% acetabular force and 8.2% ± 4.1% impact force. These results demonstrate the importance of supporting the femoral neck cortex to prevent femoral fractures in a sideways fall, and provide plausible options for prophylactic femoral augmentation. As this is a preliminary study, the surgical technique, the possible effects of trabecular bone damage during the augmentation process, and the effect on the blood supply to the femoral head must be assessed further.

Beneficial osseointegration effect of hydroxyapatite coating on cranial implant - FEM investigation

A firm connection of the bone-implant-fixation system is of utmost importance for patients with cranial defects. In order to improve the connection reliability, the current research focuses on finding the optimal fixation method, as well as selection of the implant manufacturing methods and the used materials. For the latter, implementation of bioactive materials such as hydroxyapatite or other calcium phosphates has also been considered in the literature. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of gradual osseointegration on the biomechanical performance of cranial Ti6Al4V implants with a deposited HA coating as the osseointegration agent. This effect was assessed by two different computational approaches using finite element method (FEM) modeling. The values of key input parameters necessary for FEM were obtained from experimental plasma spray deposition of HA layers onto Ti6Al4V samples. Immediately upon implantation, the HA layer at the bone-implant contact area brought only a slight decrease in the values of von Mises stress in the implant and the micro-screws when compared to a non-coated counterpart; importantly, this was without any negative trade-off in other important characteristics. The major benefit of the HA coatings was manifested upon the modeled osseointegration: the results of both approaches confirmed a significant reduction of investigated parameters such as the total implant displacements (reduced from 0.050 mm to 0.012 mm and 0.002 mm while using Approach I and II, respectively) and stresses (reduced from 52 MPa to 10 MPa and 1 MPa) in the implanted components in comparison to non-coated variant. This is a very promising result for potential use of thermally sprayed HA coatings for cranial implants.

Monetite-based composite cranial implants demonstrate long-term clinical volumetric balance by concomitant bone formation and degradation

The use of calcium phosphates (CaPs) as synthetic bone substitutes should ideally result in a volumetric balance with concomitant bone formation and degradation. Clinical data on such properties is nevertheless lacking, especially for monetite-based CaPs. However, a monetite-based composite implant has recently shown promising cranial reconstructions, with both CaP degradation and bone formation. In this study, the volumetric change at the implant site was quantified longitudinally by clinical computed tomography (CT). The retrospective CT datasets had been acquired postoperatively (n = 10), in 1-year (n = 9) and 3-year (n = 5) follow-ups. In the 1-year follow-up, the total volumetric change at the implant site was -8 ± 8%. A volumetric increase (bone formation) was found in the implant-bone interface, and a volumetric decrease was observed in the central region (CaP degradation). In the subjects with 2- or 3-year follow-ups, the rate of volumetric decrease slowed down or plateaued. The reported degradation rate is lower than previous clinical studies on monetite, likely due to the presence of pyrophosphate in the monetite-based CaP-formulation. A 31-months retrieval specimen analysis demonstrated that parts of the CaP had been remodeled into bone. The CaP phase composition remained stable, with 6% transformation into hydroxyapatite. In conclusion, this study demonstrates successful bone-bonding between the CaP-material and the recipient bone, as well as a long-term volumetric balance in cranial defects repaired with the monetite-based composite implant, which motivates further clinical use. The developed methods could be used in future studies for correlating spatiotemporal information regarding bone regeneration and CaP degradation to e.g. patient demographics. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: In bone defect reconstructions, the use of calcium phosphate (CaP) bioceramics ideally results in a volumetric balance between bone formation and CaP degradation. Clinical data on the volumetric balance is nevertheless lacking, especially for monetite-based CaPs. Here, this concept is investigated for a composite cranial implant. The implant volumes were quantified from clinical CT-data: postoperatively, one year and three years postoperatively. In total, -8 ± 8% (n = 9) volumetric change was observed after one year. But the change plateaued, with only 2% additional decrease at the 3-year follow-up (n = 5), indicating a lower CaP degradation rate. Osseointegration was seen at the bone-implant interface, with a 9 ± 7% volumetric change after one year. This study presented the first quantitative spatiotemporal CT analysis of monetite-based CaPs.

Is the 0.2%-Strain-Offset Approach Appropriate for Calculating the Yield Stress of Cortical Bone?

The 0.2% strain offset approach is mostly used to calculate the yield stress and serves as an efficient method for cross-lab comparisons of measured material properties. However, it is difficult to accurately determine the yield of the bone. Especially when computational models require accurate material parameters, clarification of the yield point is needed. We tested 24 cortical specimens harvested from six bovine femora in three-point bending mode, and 11 bovine femoral cortical specimens in the tensile mode. The Young's modulus and yield stress for each specimen derived from the specimen-specific finite element (FE) optimization method was regarded as the most ideal constitutive parameter. Then, the strain offset optimization method was used to find the strain offset closest to the ideal yield stress for the 24 specimens. The results showed that the 0 strain offsets underestimated (- 25%) the yield stress in bending and tensile tests, while the 0.2% strain offsets overestimated the yield stress (+ 65%) in three-point bending tests. Instead, the yield stress determined by 0.007 and 0.05% strain offset for bending and tensile loading respectively, can effectively characterize the biomechanical responses of the bone, thereby helping to build an accurate FE model.