Is the application of a silane-based coupling agent necessary to stabilize the fatigue performance of bonded simplified lithium disilicate restorations?

Effect of hydrofluoric acid and self-etch ceramic primers on the flexural strength and fatigue resistance of glass ceramics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies

This systematic review evaluated the effect of different hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching regimens and a self-etch ceramic primer (SECP) on the flexural strength (FS) and fatigue failure load (FFL) of glass-ceramic materials.The identification of relevant studies was conducted by two authors in five databases: PubMED, Scopus, Web Of Science, LILACS and Virtual Health Library (BVS) until July 2022 with no year limit. The analysis was conducted in RevMan 5.4.1 Software (Cochrane Collaboration) using Random effect model at 5 %. The risk of bias of the included studies were assessed. From the 5349 articles identified, 34 were included for quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis showed that for predominantly glassy ceramics, etching with HF 5 % had no significant impact on FS, however, HF acid etching with concentrations greater than 5 % negatively impacted FS. For lithium disilicate glass-ceramics (LDGC) HF acid etching, negatively influenced FS, while increasing the FFL. HF etching negatively affected FS of hybrid ceramics. The self-etch ceramic primer and HF acid etching showed a similar impact on FFL and FS. This meta-analysis indicates that the impact of SECP and HF acid etching on the mechanical behavior of glass ceramics is material-dependent.

Thickness and Substrate Effect on the Mechanical Behaviour of Direct Occlusal Veneers

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance and stress magnitude of occlusal veneers made of conventional or flowable resin composites at different minimal thicknesses bonded on enamel or dentin.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 120 sound bovine incisors were flattened and used as substrates (enamel or dentin) for the restorations. The teeth were embedded into polymethyl methacrylate and allocated into 4 groups according to the resin composite (Clearfil AP-X PLT and Clearfil Majesty Flow, Kuraray Dental) and substrate. Further, the substrates were randomly subdivided in 12 groups (N = 120, n = 10) according to the occlusal veneer minimal thickness: 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mm. The teeth were directly restored with a standardised procedure. Then, the specimens were loaded until fracture in a universal testing machine (Instron 6022, Instron Corp.). A 3-way and a 1-way analysis of variance were used to determine significant differences for each factor. Three-dimensional finite element analysis was carried out following the in vitro boundary conditions to assess the stress magnitude in the restoration during compressive loading.

RESULTS

The fracture loads were recorded into initial load to failure (ILF) and fatal load to failure (FLF). Differences were found in material for ILF and FLF, leading to an overall equal good performance in fracture load and stress distribution for both materials, regardless of the substrate. Differences in thickness were apparent in both ILF and FLF.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct conventional and flow resin composite occlusal veneers present a promising mechanical behaviour when bonded on enamel or dentin. However, caution is advised when preparing 0.5-mm minimal thickness restorations.

Fit and fatigue behavior of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate crowns

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

New computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) lithium disilicate glass-ceramics have been marketed. However, information concerning their biomechanical behavior is lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the fit and fatigue behavior of two recently introduced CAD-CAM lithium disilicate materials with the standard IPS e.max CAD ceramic and to investigate the effect of the thermal treatment for crystallization on crown fit.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Monolithic crowns (n=15) were milled from 3 CAD-CAM lithium disilicates: IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar AG), Rosetta SM (Hass), and T-lithium (Shenzhen Upcera Dental Technology). Marginal and internal fit were evaluated using the replica technique before and after crystallization, and the fatigue behavior of the luted crowns was evaluated by the step-stress method. One-way ANOVA and the Tukey test were used to compare fit among the materials. Fatigue failure load was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier and Mantel-Cox tests. The effect of crystallization on fit was evaluated with the paired t test (α=.05).

RESULTS

Marginal fit was different between IPS e.max CAD (74 μm) and Rosetta SM (63 μm) (P=.02). T-lithium was similar to the other ceramics (68 μm) (P>.05). Occlusal internal space was similar among all materials (P=.69). Fatigue failure loads of Rosetta SM (1160 N) and T-lithium (1063 N) were similar to IPS e.max CAD (1082 N) (P>.05). The fatigue failure load of Rosetta SM was higher than that of T-lithium (P=.04). Crystallization reduced the axial internal space of all materials (P<.05) without significantly affecting marginal fit (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The fit and fatigue behavior of Rosetta SM and T-lithium were similar to that of IPS e.max CAD. Crystallization reduced the internal space of the crowns.

Adhesive application after ceramic surface treatment is detrimental to load-bearing capacity under fatigue of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether an adhesive application after surface treatment on a lithium disilicate ceramic (LD) has an influence on its load-bearing capacity under fatigue.

METHODS

LD discs (Ø= 10 mm; thickness= 1 mm) were allocated into 8 groups (n= 15), considering 3 factors: "ceramic surface treatment" - HF: hydrofluoric acid + universal primer application; or MEP: single-component ceramic primer; "adhesive application" - with or without; and "aging protocol" - baseline: 24 h to 7 days; or aging: 180 days of storage + 25,000 thermal cycles. The LD discs were adhesively bonded to glass fiber-reinforced epoxy resin discs (Ø= 10 mm; thickness= 2 mm) and stored according to the condition and each group. Cyclic fatigue testing (initial load= 100 N; step size= 100 N until600 N and after step size= 25 N to failure; 10,000 cycles/step; 20 Hz frequency) was performed. Fractographic and adhesive interface analyzes were also performed. The collected data were then analyzed by Kaplan Meier and Mantel-Cox tests and One-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

The adhesive application in the baseline condition had no influence on the load-bearing capacity under fatigue when the HF surface treatment was performed, however, adhesive application for the MEP treatment led to worse results than without it. The adhesive application in the aged condition showed worse fatigue outcomes for both treatments. All specimens presented radial cracks. MEP treatment followed by adhesive application presented the thickest luting layer.

CONCLUSION

The adhesive application after surface treatments of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic is detrimental to its load-bearing capacity under fatigue when adhesively luted onto a supporting substrate.