The ABCs of a safer laparoscopic entry

Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative adhesion mapping by ultrasonography for laparoscopic surgery in patients with past abdominal surgery with special reference to loose adhesion

PURPOSE

Endoscopic surgery is widely accepted for both elective and emergent abdominal surgery. This study was performed to assess the accuracy of preoperative adhesion mapping by abdominal ultrasonography (US).

METHODS

Intra-abdominal intestinal adhesions on the abdominal wall in 50 patients with a history of abdominal surgery were prospectively assessed by the visceral slide test with US before laparoscopic surgery from 2019 to 2022. Adhesion was assessed in six separate abdominal zones during US. Actual adhesion on the abdominal wall was confirmed during laparoscopic surgery.

RESULTS

The sliding distances in upper right, upper central, upper left, lower right, lower central, and lower left zones in patients with versus without intestinal adhesion were 4.4 versus 1.4 cm (P = .004), 3.4 versus 2.5 cm, 4.3 versus 1.3 cm (P = .011), 3.1 versus 1.5 cm (P = .0014), 3.3 versus 1.1 cm (P = .013), and 3.4 versus 0.8 cm (P = .0061), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed the optimal value of sliding distance as 2.5 cm and the area under the curve as 0.86. The specificity of US assessment of adhesion was lower in the central zone than in lateral zones. Loose adhesion mostly seen around the scar was attributed to either filmy tissue or omental adhesion, leading to visceral sliding during US.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed the reason for insufficient accuracy of preoperative US assessment of intestinal adhesion around the scar area because of loose adhesion. The upper lateral area might be optimal for first port insertion.

Primary entry trocar design and entry-related complications at laparoscopy in obese patients: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Safe primary entry at laparoscopy could present challenges in obese patients. Various techniques have been proposed in previous studies, however, the characteristics of the actual device utilized may be more influential than the technique in achieving successful abdominal entry in patients with increased BMI.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis included both randomized and non-randomized studies gathered with no date filters from MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Clinicaltrials.gov. PRISMA guidelines underpinned the conduct and reporting of the review. The meta-analysis of proportions was conducted using a generalized linear mixed model and analyses included random-effects models. The primary outcome was the proportion of first access vascular and visceral injuries incurred in the process of laparoscopic abdominal surgery in patients with a BMI >30 kg/m2. Subgroup analysis was performed for optical versus non-optically enabled devices.

RESULTS

In total, 5403 patients were analysed across 13 observational studies with a mean BMI of 45.93 kg/m2. In 216 patients from two randomized studies, the mean BMI was 39.92 kg/m2. The overall incidence using a random-effects model was 8.1 per 1000 events of visceral and vascular injuries (95 per cent c.i. 0.003 to 0.024). Heterogeneity was statistically significant at I2 = 80.5 per cent (69.6 per cent; 87.5 per cent, P< 0.0001). In a subgroup analysis, a tendency towards reduced injuries when optical devices were employed was observed with one per 100 injuries in these trocars (95 per cent c.i. 0.001 to 0.018) versus four per 100 (95 per cent c.i. -0.019 to -0.102) in non-optically enabled devices.

CONCLUSION

Injuries during primary laparoscopic entry undertaken in obese patient groups are uncommon. Due to considerable heterogeneity in the small number of examined studies, evidence was insufficient and largely of low quality to ascribe differences in the incidence of injuries to the characteristics of the primary entry trocar utilized.

Jain point: an alternate laparoscopic non-umbilical first blind entry port to avoid vessel, viscera, adhesions and bowel (VVAB)

The Jain point entry is based on the concept of non-umbilical entry to avoid sudden catastrophic injury to major retroperitoneal vessels, viscera, adhesions and bowel which could happen before the start of procedure by blind umbilical entry. To study the safety and efficacy of a novel first non-umbilical blind entry port. Tertiary referral centre for advanced laparoscopic surgeries with active training and fellowship programs. A large retrospective study of 7802 cases done at Vardhman Infertility & Laparoscopy Centre from January 2011 to December 2020. In all cases, first blind entry was by veress needle and 5 mm trocar and telescope through a non-umbilical port, The Jain point, irrespective of BMI, large masses, lax abdomen, previous surgery and complex situations. Patients’ demographic profile, types of surgeries performed and entry-related complications were recorded and analysed. Mean age of patients was 33 years with BMI ranging from 12.66 to 54.41 kg/m². Thus, Jain point can be applicable for all ranges of BMI, all types of surgeries from simple to complex and large masses. Entry related minor complications were in 3.4% cases while major complication involving bowel occurred in one case. No case of injury to major retro-peritoneal vessel was seen. Jain point entry is a novel, first blind 5 mm non-umbilical, entry technique in a variety of surgeries and previous scars and patients with wide range of BMI. It has a short learning curve and continues as main ergonomic working port.

Guideline No. 412: Laparoscopic Entry for Gynaecological Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the benefits and risks of laparoscopic surgery and provide clinical direction on entry techniques, technologies, and their associated complications in gynaecological surgery.

TARGET POPULATION

All patients, including pregnant women and women with obesity, undergoing laparoscopic surgery for various gynaecological indications.

OPTIONS

The laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies reviewed in formulating this guideline included the closed (Veress needle-pneumoperitoneum-trocar) technique, direct trocar insertion, open (Hasson) technique, visual entry systems, and disposable shielded and radially expanding trocars.

OUTCOMES

Implementation of this guideline should optimize decision-making in the selection of entry technique for laparoscopic surgery.

EVIDENCE

We searched English-language articles from September 2005 to December 2019 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus, and Cochrane Library using the following MeSH search terms alone or in combination: laparoscopic entry, laparoscopy access, pneumoperitoneum, Veress needle, open (Hasson), direct trocar, visual entry, shielded trocars, radially expanded trocars, and laparoscopic complications.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care approach (Appendix A).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Surgeons performing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Staging laparoscopy and Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastasis: safe access to the abdomen

BACKGROUND

Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an innovative drug delivery technique. Most common indication is palliative therapy of peritoneal metastasis of gastrointestinal and gynecological origin in the salvage situation. Access to the abdomen is the critical step of the procedure, since most patients had previous surgery. Potential pitfalls include non-access because of adhesions, bowel access lesions and postoperative subcutaneous toxic emphysema.

METHODS

We propose a technique, the "finger-access technique" that might prevent largely these pitfalls. A minilaparotomy of 3 cm is performed in the midline, a finger introduced into the abdomen and a 5-mm double-balloon trocar (no Hasson trocar) is placed under finger protection at some distance of the first incision. The fascia of the minilaparotomy, not the skin, is then closed. The abdomen is insufflated with CO2 and tightness is controlled with saline solution in the minilaparotomy. A second 10-12 mm trocar is then introduced under videoscopic control. The first trocar is then visualized through the second one to exclude a bowel lesion during first access.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

In our hands, this access technique has shown to be safe and effective.

Comparison of two methods of laparoscopic trocar insertion (Hasson and Visiport) in terms of speed and complication in urologic surgery

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, diverse approaches have been existed for laparoscopic procedures. The most common laparoscopic entry methods included close and direct entry laparoscopy and open (Hasson) laparoscopy. There is no evidence regarding the superiority in safety and initial speed for the use of open and optical laparoscopic entry. Therefore, the sight of current study was to evaluate comparative survey of two methods of laparoscopic trocar insertion (Hasson and VisiportTM) in terms of speed and complications in urologic surgery.

METHODS

This expertized base clinical trial study was conducted on 100 patients who underwent urological laparoscopy in Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. These patients were randomly divided to two groups (n = 50). One group underwent open laparoscopy and another group Visiport optical trocar. Speed and Complications of urologic surgery was extracted from medical records. Independent T test was used for doing of analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients in Hasson and Visiport laparoscopic group was 41.4 ± 11.2 and 41.6 ± 15 years old, respectively (p = 0.91). The mean time for initial trocar placement in patients who underwent Visiport trocar system and Hasson laparoscopic technique was 37.7 ± 15.59 and 95.4 ± 31.75 seconds. There was gratifying difference between two techniques of laparoscopic trocar insertion (Hasson and Visiport) in terms of speed (p = 0.000). In addition, complications were observed in 8% of patients who underwent Visiport trocar system. However, no complications were observed in Hasson laparoscopy group.

CONCLUSION

Visiport optical trocar technique is faster for initial trocar placement than open laparoscopy. However it is associated with complications compared to open laparoscopy. Therefore, there is evidence of benefit in terms of speed for initial trocar placement and harm based on complications in Visiport trocar system.

Jain point: A new safe portal for laparoscopic entry in previous surgery cases

INTRODUCTION

The present study was performed to assess the safety and feasibility of a new laparoscopic entry site in cases suspected of adhesions due to previous surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It is a retrospective study undertaken at a tertiary care referral center for advanced gynecological laparoscopic surgery from January 2011 to December 2014.

RESULTS

In 624 patients with a history of previous abdominal surgeries, the laparoscopic entry site was through a newly devised point. It is a point in the left paraumbilical region at the level of umbilicus, in a straight line drawn vertically upward from a point 2.5 cm medial to anterior superior iliac spine. Intra-abdominal adhesions were found in 487 (78.0%) patients, and umbilical adhesions in 404 (64.7%) patients with past abdominal surgeries.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant entry-related, intra-operative, or postoperative complications with the use of this entry point. It is also suitable as a main working port during the course of surgery.

Laparoscopic management of a large torted ovarian cyst in an adolescent virgin: a case report

We report a case of a torted mature cystic teratoma in a 23-year-old, sexually inactive, virgin female which necessitated immediate laparoscopy. The patient and her family stressed that the integrity of the hymen must be maintained at any cost, for cultural reasons. We opted out of our routine intravaginal preparation for laparoscopic surgery to honor the patient’s request to maintain the integrity of the hymen. Left salpingo-oophorectomy was accomplished, and the specimen was removed using a large nephrectomy endobag. Here, we describe techniques that are useful for this procedure, including the use of gauze attached to ovum forceps to manipulate the uterus through the rectum, and a review of the literature.

The safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle for laparoscopic entry: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the safety of direct trocar insertion (DTI) versus Veress needle followed by primary trocar insertion (VN).

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE(®), Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Scopus, and the reference lists of published articles were searched up to September 2011 to identify randomized clinical trials comparing DTI with VN. This meta-analysis was restricted to randomized studies comparing the safety of these two laparoscopic entry techniques.

RESULTS

Seven randomized studies consisting of 2940 women (VN, n=1525; DTI, n=1415) were identified. The data on the safety of two entry techniques were abstracted, integrated, and analyzed with the meta-analysis method and are presented as pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). There were 4 cases of a major complication in the VN group in contrast to none in the DTI group. Pooled results failed to show a statistically significant difference in the risk of major complications between the two groups. A significantly higher risk of minor complications was detected in the VN group (RR [95% CI]=10.78 [6.27-18.51]). Among minor complications, preperitoneal injuries (46.73 [11.55-189.10]) and omental injuries (4.51 [2.12-9.62]) were the two most common complications in the VN group. There were significantly increased risks of multiple insertions (more than two attempts) (2.99 [2.11-4.23]) and failed entry (2.21[1.07-4.56]) in the VN group.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that the commonly used VN entry technique carries a significantly increased risk of minor complications. In addition, the likelihood of multiple insertions and failed entry are significantly higher in the VN group.

Laparoscopic findings, histopathologic evaluation, and clinical outcomes in women with chronic pelvic pain after hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To laparoscopically evaluate the pelvis of patients with chronic pelvic pain after hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, to determine any associated factors to the pain.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort of patients with chronic pelvic pain after hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2).

SETTING

University-affiliated teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

From January 1990 through May 2002, 124 women with chronic pelvic pain after hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy underwent laparoscopic and histopathologic evaluation of the pelvis.

INTERVENTION

Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed to inspect the pelvis for any signs of pathology. If any abnormalities were visualized, they were treated with CO2 laser resection and sent for histopathologic evaluation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Laparoscopic and histopathologic findings of the pelvis, as well as subjective pain improvement after laparoscopy.

CONCLUSION

The most common histopathologic findings at laparoscopy in women with chronic pelvic pain after hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy included adhesions, adnexal remnants, and endometriosis. Laparoscopic treatment of any pelvic pathologic condition improved pain symptoms in these women.