Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Laberge PY, Vilos AG, Abu-Rafea B, Scattolon S, Leyland N. Guideline No. 412: Laparoscopic Entry for Gynaecological Surgery.
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2020;
43:376-389.e1. [PMID:
33373697 DOI:
10.1016/j.jogc.2020.12.012]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the benefits and risks of laparoscopic surgery and provide clinical direction on entry techniques, technologies, and their associated complications in gynaecological surgery.
TARGET POPULATION
All patients, including pregnant women and women with obesity, undergoing laparoscopic surgery for various gynaecological indications.
OPTIONS
The laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies reviewed in formulating this guideline included the closed (Veress needle-pneumoperitoneum-trocar) technique, direct trocar insertion, open (Hasson) technique, visual entry systems, and disposable shielded and radially expanding trocars.
OUTCOMES
Implementation of this guideline should optimize decision-making in the selection of entry technique for laparoscopic surgery.
EVIDENCE
We searched English-language articles from September 2005 to December 2019 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus, and Cochrane Library using the following MeSH search terms alone or in combination: laparoscopic entry, laparoscopy access, pneumoperitoneum, Veress needle, open (Hasson), direct trocar, visual entry, shielded trocars, radially expanded trocars, and laparoscopic complications.
VALIDATION METHODS
The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care approach (Appendix A).
INTENDED AUDIENCE
Surgeons performing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.
SUMMARY STATEMENTS
RECOMMENDATIONS.
Collapse