1
|
Wong SW, Crowe P. Automated performance metrics, learning curve and robotic colorectal surgery. Int J Med Robot 2023:e2588. [PMID: 37855300 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of Automated Performance Metrics (APMs) in assessing the learning curve. METHODS A retrospective review of 85 consecutive patients who underwent total robotic colorectal surgery at a single institution between August 2020 and October 2022 was performed. Patient demographics, operation type, and APMs were collected and analysed. Cumulative summation technique (CUSUM) was used to construct learning curves of surgeon console time (SCT), use of the fourth arm, clutch activation, instrument off screen (number and duration), and cut electrocautery activation. RESULTS Two phases with 50 and 35 cases were identified from the CUSUM graph for SCT. The SCT was significantly different between the two phases (176 and 251 min, p < 0.002). After adjustment for SCT, the APMs were not significantly different between the two phases. CONCLUSIONS Most APMs do not offer additional learning curve information when compared with SCT analysis alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shing Wai Wong
- Department of General Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Randwick Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Philip Crowe
- Department of General Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Randwick Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bruno V, Chiofalo B, Logoteta A, Brandolino G, Savone D, Russo M, Sperduti I, Mancini E, Fabrizi L, Anceschi U, Vizza E. Urological Complications in Radical Surgery for Cervical Cancer: A Comparative Meta-Analysis before and after LACC Trial. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5677. [PMID: 37685744 PMCID: PMC10488957 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND After the LACC trial publication in 2018, the minimally invasive approach (MIS) has severely decreased in favor of open surgery: MIS radical hysterectomy was associated with worse oncological outcomes than open surgery, but urological complications were never extensively explored in pre- versus post-LACC eras, even if they had a great impact on post-operative QoL. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare functional and organic urological complication rates before and after LACC trial. METHODS An independent search of the literature was conducted 4 years before and after the LACC trial and 50 studies were included. RESULTS The overall rate of urologic complications was higher in pre-LACC studies while no differences were found for organic urological complications. Conversely, the overall risk of dysfunctional urological complications showed a higher rate in the pre-LACC era. This is probably related to a sudden shift to open surgery, with potential lower thermal damage to the urinary tract autonomic nervous fibers. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis showed that the incidence of urological complications in radical cervical cancer surgery was higher before the LACC trial, potentially due to the shift to open surgery. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to shed light on the connection between minimally invasive surgery and urological damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Bruno
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (V.B.); (B.C.); (E.M.); (E.V.)
| | - Benito Chiofalo
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (V.B.); (B.C.); (E.M.); (E.V.)
| | - Alessandra Logoteta
- Department of Maternal Infantile and Urological Sciences, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy; (A.L.)
| | - Gabriella Brandolino
- Department of Maternal Infantile and Urological Sciences, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy; (A.L.)
| | - Delia Savone
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (V.B.); (B.C.); (E.M.); (E.V.)
| | - Mario Russo
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Unit of Biostatistical, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy;
| | - Emanuela Mancini
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (V.B.); (B.C.); (E.M.); (E.V.)
| | - Luana Fabrizi
- Anesthesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy;
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy;
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (V.B.); (B.C.); (E.M.); (E.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seon KE, Lee YJ, Lee JY, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim YT, Kim SW. Comparing surgical outcomes of da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi for endometrial cancer surgical staging in a propensity score-matched study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:11752. [PMID: 37474581 PMCID: PMC10359395 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37659-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The number of studies comparing robotic systems in endometrial cancer staging is limited. This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 42 consecutive endometrial cancer patients, who underwent robotic staging using the da Vinci SP (SP) system, and 126 propensity score-matched patients who underwent staging using the da Vinci Xi (Xi) system. Median console and total operation times were longer in the SP group than those in the Xi group (125 vs. 77 min, p < 0.001; 225 vs. 154.5 min, p < 0.001, respectively). Notably, the median console time of the first 10 cases using SP was 184 min; it subsequently decreased to 99.5 min in the fourth 10 cases. SP had lesser postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) change (0.6 ± 0.7 g/dL vs. 1.8 ± 0.9 g/dL in Xi, p < 0.001) and lower median pain score at 6 h after surgery (2 vs. 3 in Xi, p = 0.046). Moreover, median postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the SP group (2 days) than that in the Xi group (6 days) (p < 0.001). Although SP was correlated with lower postoperative Hb change, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower pain score than those in Xi, it required longer operation times. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to validate the benefits of SP compared to other robotic platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ki Eun Seon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Yong Jae Lee
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Jung-Yun Lee
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Eun Ji Nam
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Sunghoon Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Young Tae Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Sang Wun Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wong SW, Ang ZH, Crowe P. Improving ergonomics for the bedside assistant in robotic colorectal surgery. J Surg Case Rep 2023; 2023:rjad007. [PMID: 36711439 PMCID: PMC9874185 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjad007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of the study was to document when significant bedside assistant (BA) and robotic arm collisions occurred during robotic colorectal surgery (RCS). An observational study of 10 consecutive RCS cases, from May 2022 to September 2022, was performed. Situations when there was significant collision between BA arm and robotic arm (to cause inadvertent movement of the assistant instrument) were documented. The assistant port was randomly placed to the right or the left side of the camera port. Situations which led to detrimental BA ergonomics include dissection at the most peripheral working field, proximity of the target (mesenteric vessels), small bowel retraction, placement of the assistant port in the medial position (on the left side of the camera port), during intra-corporeal suturing and robotic stapler use. The robotic console surgeon can predictably identify and avoid situations when injury to the BA may occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zhen Hao Ang
- Department of General Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,Prince of Wales Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Philip Crowe
- Department of General Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,Prince of Wales Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Specchia ML, Arcuri G, Di Pilla A, La Gatta E, Osti T, Limongelli P, Scambia G, Bellantone RDA. The value of surgical admissions for malignant uterine cancer. A comparative analysis of robotic, laparoscopic, and laparotomy surgery in a university hospital. Front Public Health 2022; 10:920578. [PMID: 36276379 PMCID: PMC9582355 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.920578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Robotic surgery for malignant uterine cancer raises issue of economic sustainability for providers. The objective of this study was to assess the value of surgical admissions for malignant uterine cancer in a University Hospital through an analysis of their costs and outcomes by comparing three different surgical approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery). Methods Hospitalizations between 1 January 2019 and 31 October 2021 for malignant uterine cancer surgery were selected and stratified. For each surgical approach, mean values (with 95% confidence intervals, CI) were calculated for cost items. Moreover, 30-day readmission frequency was calculated for the three approaches compared to each other. ANOVA and Student's t-test and relative risk (RR) were used for statistical analysis. A break-even analysis was carried out by evaluating the volume of robotic and non-robotic surgical admissions. Results A total of 1,336 hospitalizations were included in the study, 366 with robotic, 591 with laparoscopic, and 379 with laparotomy surgery. Robotic surgery, compared to laparoscopic and laparotomy ones, showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in the economic margin, which was largely negative (-1069.18 €; 95%CI:-1240.44--897.92 €) mainly due to devices cost, and a lower percentage of 30-day readmissions (1.4%; 95%CI: 0.2-2.6%), with a statistically significant difference only vs. laparotomy (p = 0.029). Laparoscopic compared to laparotomy surgery showed a significantly (p < 0,001) more profitable economic margin (1692.21 €; 95%CI: 1531.75 €-1852.66 €) without a significant difference for 30-day readmissions. Break-even analysis showed that, on average, for each malignant uterine cancer elective surgery performed laparoscopically, 1.58 elective robotic surgeries are sustainable for the hospital (95% CI: 1.23-2.06). Conclusion Break-even analysis could be a useful tool to support hospital management in planning and governance of malignant uterine cancer surgery. Systematic application of this tool will allow defining over time right distribution of robotic, laparoscopic, and laparotomy surgeries' volumes to perform to ensure both quality and economic-financial balance and therefore value of uterine oncological surgery. Concerning research, this study paves the way for a multicentric study, the extension of outcomes of malignant uterine surgery to be considered and assessed, and the future inclusion of other therapeutic interventions in the analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Lucia Specchia
- Clinical Governance Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,Life Sciences and Public Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Arcuri
- Health Technologies and Innovation Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Pilla
- Clinical Governance Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,Life Sciences and Public Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy,*Correspondence: Andrea Di Pilla
| | - Emanuele La Gatta
- Life Sciences and Public Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso Osti
- Life Sciences and Public Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Prospero Limongelli
- Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Life Sciences and Public Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy,Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Domenico Alfonso Bellantone
- Clinical Governance Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,Translational Medicine and Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martinez O, Murphy C, Bsatee A, Brown DH, Abaza R. Impact of Surgeon-Controlled Suction During Robotic Prostatectomy to Reduce Dependence on Bedside Assistance. J Endourol 2021; 35:1163-1167. [PMID: 33619992 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.1059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Suction during robotic surgery has traditionally been performed by a bedside assistant. Adequately skilled assistants are not always available. We assessed a purpose-designed robotic surgeon-controlled suction catheter for efficiency and safety by comparing with historic cases of suction controlled by a dedicated bedside assistant using standard rigid laparoscopic suction. Methods: Beginning in February 2019, the remotely operated suction irrigation (ROSI) device was used in all robotic prostatectomy procedures, which is a flexible suction catheter manipulated by the surgeon such that a bedside assistant is never required for suction. The initial 300 consecutive cases performed with ROSI were compared with the 300 immediately previous procedures using bedside assistant suction (BAS). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between groups in age, body mass index, American Anesthesiologist Association score, prostate specific antigen, or pathologic stage. Lymph node dissection was performed in all 600 patients. All 300 ROSI cases were completed without requiring switching to BAS. Estimated blood loss (102.7 vs 120.2 mL, p = 0.001) and operative time (156.1 vs 149.3 minutes, p < 0.001) were slightly lower in the ROSI group. There was no statistical difference in the 90-day complication rate (Clavien ≥III) between groups, with both having 3% of patients readmitted or seen in the emergency department within 90 days of surgery. Conclusion: Surgeon-controlled suction allowed more surgeon autonomy without a negative impact on efficiency or safety issues requiring "bailout" suctioning by the bedside assistant whether urgent or otherwise. Robotic surgeons without access to skilled bedside assistants should consider suctioning for themselves not unlike the norm for many laparoscopic surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Martinez
- Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, OhioHealth Dublin Methodist Hospital, Dublin, Ohio, USA
| | - Christopher Murphy
- Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, OhioHealth Dublin Methodist Hospital, Dublin, Ohio, USA
| | - Aya Bsatee
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dublin, Ohio, USA
| | - David Hugh Brown
- Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, OhioHealth Dublin Methodist Hospital, Dublin, Ohio, USA
| | - Ronney Abaza
- Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, OhioHealth Dublin Methodist Hospital, Dublin, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eoh KJ, Lee DW, Lee JH, Nam EJ, Kim SW, Kim YT. Comparative Survival Outcome of Robot-Assisted Staging Surgery Using Three Robotic Arms versus Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer. Yonsei Med J 2021; 62:68-74. [PMID: 33381936 PMCID: PMC7820443 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.1.68] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is lack of data on direct comparison of survival outcomes between open surgery and robot-assisted staging surgery (RSS) using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between open surgery and RSS using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive women with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery between May 2006 and May 2018 were identified. Robotic procedures were performed using the da Vinci robotic system, and the robotic approach consisted of three robotic arms including a camera arm. Propensity score matching, as well as univariate and multivariate Cox regression of OS and DFS were performed according to clinicopathologic data and surgical method. RESULTS The study cohort included 423 unselected patients with endometrial cancer, of whom 218 underwent open surgery and 205 underwent RSS using three robotic arms. Propensity score-matched cohorts of 146 women in each surgical group showed no significant differences in survival: 5-year OS of 91% vs. 92% and DFS of 86% vs. 89% in the open and robotic cohorts, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.67). In the univariate analysis with OS as the endpoint, surgical method, age, stage, type II histology, grade, and lymph node metastasis were independently associated with survival. Surgical stage, grade, and type II histology were found to be significant independent predictors for OS in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION RSS using three robotic arms and laparotomy for endometrial carcinoma had comparable survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Jin Eoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dae Woo Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Ji Nam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Wun Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Tae Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hu M, Han C, Guo T, Tian H, Zhan W, Yang J, Jing W, Deng Y, Li X, Ma S, Cai H, Ma Y. Application of da Vinci robot with the"3 + 2" mode in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e22988. [PMID: 33181662 PMCID: PMC7668502 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000022988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and advantages of the da Vinci robotic system with the "3 + 2" mode (3 robotic arms and 2 assistants) in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.The clinical data of 65 patients who underwent da Vinci robotic gastrectomy with the "3 + 2" mode from July 2016 to October 2019 were grouped into an observation group. An additional 65 patients who underwent robotic gastrectomy under the classic mode during the same period were grouped into a control group. The short-term surgical outcomes were compared between 2 different groups.Compared with the control group, the observation group had a significantly shorter operative time (176.18 ± 15.49 vs 203.85 ± 12.77 minutes, P < .001) and lower operation costs ($2761.19 ± $191.91 vs $3690.91 ± $162.82; P < .001). No statistical differences in other outcomes were observed (P > .05).We show that robotic gastrectomy with "3 + 2" mode is a safe and beneficial surgical procedure in new robotic surgery institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Hu
- Department of General Surgery
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Hospital
| | - Caiwen Han
- Department of General Surgery
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Hospital
| | - Tiankang Guo
- Department of General Surgery
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Hospital
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Hongwei Tian
- Department of General Surgery
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Hospital
| | - Weipeng Zhan
- Department of General Surgery
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Hospital
| | - Jing Yang
- Department of General Surgery
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Hospital
| | - Wutang Jing
- Department of General Surgery
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Hospital
| | - Yuan Deng
- Department of General Surgery
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Hospital
| | - Xiaofei Li
- Department of General Surgery
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Hospital
| | - Shixun Ma
- Department of General Surgery
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Hospital
| | - Hui Cai
- Department of General Surgery
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Hospital
| | - Yuntao Ma
- Department of General Surgery
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van der Schans EM, Hiep MAJ, Consten ECJ, Broeders IAMJ. From Da Vinci Si to Da Vinci Xi: realistic times in draping and docking the robot. J Robot Surg 2020; 14:835-839. [PMID: 32078114 PMCID: PMC7674320 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01057-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery is assumed to be time consuming partially due to extra time needed in preparing the robot. The objective of this study was to give realistic times in Da Vinci Xi draping and docking and to analyse the learning curve in the transition from the Si to the Xi in an experienced team. This prospective study was held in a hospital with a high volume of robot-assisted surgery in general surgery, urology and gynaecology. Times from the moment patients entered the operating room until the surgeon took place behind console were precisely recorded during the first 6 weeks after the implementation of the Xi. In total, 65 procedures were performed and documented. The learning curve for the process of draping and docking the robot was reached after 21 and 18 cases, respectively. Mean times after completion of the learning curve were 5 min for draping and 7 min for docking and were statistically different from mean times before completion of the learning curve (p values < 0.01). In dedicated teams netto extra time needed for preparing the Xi can even be reduced to just the time needed for docking. Thus, setting up the robot should have limited impact on overall time spent in the operation room.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma M van der Schans
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, Amersfoort, The Netherlands. .,Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Institute of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - Marijn A J Hiep
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Institute of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo A M J Broeders
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Institute of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhan W, Hu M, Han C, Tian H, Jing W, Li X, Shi H, Yang X, Guo T, Su H, Ma Y. Safety and effectiveness of the da Vinci robot with the "3+2" mode for distal pancreatectomy. Cancer Med 2019; 8:4226-4234. [PMID: 31210421 PMCID: PMC6675730 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2019] [Revised: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, no relevant research has focused on the relationship between the clinical efficacy of da Vinci robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and the number of mechanical arms and assistants used for RDP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and advantages of RDP with the "3 + 2" mode. METHODS Clinical data from 53 patients (observation group) who received RDP using the "3 + 2" mode in our department, from March 2016 to September 2018, were reviewed. An additional 53 patients who received RDP using the classical mode were chosen at random for the control group. Short-term outcomes for the two groups were compared. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for estimated blood loss, postoperative day of flatus passage, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complication (P > 0.05). Compared with the control group, the observation group had a significantly shorter operative time (166.9 ± 13.3 vs 192.6 ± 11.1 minutes, P < 0.001), lower surgical costs ($2827.79 ± $173.02 vs $3900.63 ± $317.29, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The RDP using the "3 + 2" mode can increase the exposure of surgical field, improve cooperation between assistants, lower the surgical costs, and shorten the operative time and learning curve. Moreover, the clinical effect is equal to that of RDP using the classical mode. These findings indicate that RDP using the "3 + 2" mode is safe and feasible for institutions that are equipped for robot-assisted surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weipeng Zhan
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis and Precision Treatment of Surgical Tumors in Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ming Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis and Precision Treatment of Surgical Tumors in Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Caiwen Han
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hongwei Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis and Precision Treatment of Surgical Tumors in Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Wutang Jing
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis and Precision Treatment of Surgical Tumors in Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaofei Li
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hao Shi
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaojun Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis and Precision Treatment of Surgical Tumors in Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Tiankang Guo
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis and Precision Treatment of Surgical Tumors in Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.,Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - He Su
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis and Precision Treatment of Surgical Tumors in Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yuntao Ma
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis and Precision Treatment of Surgical Tumors in Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|