1
|
Schneyer RJ, Hamilton KM, Meyer R, Nasseri YY, Siedhoff MT. Surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis: an updated review. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2024; 36:239-246. [PMID: 38743685 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to summarize recent literature on the surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis. RECENT FINDINGS The last decade has seen a surge in the number of studies on bowel endometriosis, with a focus on preoperative evaluation, perioperative management, surgical approach, and surgical outcomes. Many of these studies have originated from large-volume referral centers with varying surgical approaches and philosophies. Colorectal surgery for endometriosis seems to have a positive impact on patient symptoms, quality of life, and fertility. However, these benefits must be weighed against a significant risk of postoperative complications and the potential for long-term bowel or bladder dysfunction, especially for more radical procedures involving the lower rectum. Importantly, most studies regarding surgical technique and outcomes have been limited by their observational design. SUMMARY The surgical management of bowel endometriosis is complex and should be approached by a multidisciplinary team. Methodical preoperative evaluation, including appropriate imaging, is vital for surgical planning and patient counseling. The decision to perform a more conservative or radical excision is nuanced and remains an area of controversy. High quality studies in the form of multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed before clear recommendations can be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Schneyer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kacey M Hamilton
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Raanan Meyer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- The Dr. Pinchas Bornstein Talpiot Medical Leadership Program, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Yosef Y Nasseri
- Department of General Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Matthew T Siedhoff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chatroux L, Maghsoudlou P, Ajao MO, King LP, Einarsson JI. Bowel Endometriosis Excision: Approaches and Outcomes Including Hand Sewing of Discoid Excision. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024:S1553-4650(24)00323-6. [PMID: 39089645 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Revised: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To examine the outcomes of surgery performed for bowel endometriosis including shaving, discoid resections with hand sewn closure, and segmental resection. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Large academic hospital PATIENTS: All patients with bowel wall endometriosis who underwent surgical excision with the Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (MIGS) between 2009 and 2022. INTERVENTIONS No interventions administered. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS From 2009 to 2022, a total of 112 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of endometriosis involving the rectum. From this cohort, 82 underwent shaving, 23 underwent discoid excision, and 7 had segmental bowel resection. The discoid excisions were closed in multiple layers with hand sewing and were not closed with a staple device. Average lesion size on preoperative imaging was 20.9 mm in the shave group, 22.5 mm in the discoid group and 38.5 mm in the segmental group. Complication requiring reoperation for anastomotic leak occurred in 3 cases (3.66%) of the shave group and 1 case (4.35%) of the discoid excision group, but did not occur in any of the segmental resections. The number of layers of closure and type of suture used did not appear to have an effect on complication rate, however this study was not powered to detect a meaningful difference. CONCLUSION Our data shows a similar rate of anastomotic leak complication for each closure type as that reported in the literature (2.2%, 9.7% and 9.9% reported for shave, discoid and segmental resection respectively). While our study is underpowered, these findings support that hand sewing for discoid excision is a safe and reasonable alternative to circular stapler closures and can be considered with an experienced surgeon. Further study is warranted to confirm safety and explore potential cost savings associated with this technique as well as applications in areas with less resources available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa Chatroux
- Brigham & Women's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Parmida Maghsoudlou
- Brigham & Women's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mobolaji O Ajao
- Brigham & Women's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Louise P King
- Brigham & Women's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jon I Einarsson
- Brigham & Women's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ianieri MM, De Cicco Nardone A, Greco P, Carcagnì A, Campolo F, Pacelli F, Scambia G, Santullo F. Totally intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis (TICA) versus classical mini-laparotomy for specimen extraction, after segmental bowel resection for deep endometriosis: a single-center experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 309:2697-2707. [PMID: 38512463 PMCID: PMC11147928 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07412-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The surgical approach to bowel endometriosis is still unclear. The aim of the study is to compare TICA to conventional specimen extractions and extra-abdominal insertion of the anvil in terms of both complications and functional outcomes. METHODS This is a single-center, observational, retrospective study conducted enrolling symptomatic women underwent laparoscopic excision of deep endometriosis with segmental bowel resection between September 2019 and June 2022. Women who underwent TICA were compared to classical technique (CT) in terms of intra- and postoperative complications, moreover, functional outcomes relating to the pelvic organs were assessed using validated questionnaires [Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom (KESS) questionnaire and Gastro-Intestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI)] for bowel function. Pain symptoms were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores. RESULTS The sample included 64 women. TICA was performed on 31.2% (n = 20) of the women, whereas CT was used on 68.8% (n = 44). None of the patients experienced rectovaginal, vesicovaginal, ureteral or vesical fistula, or ureteral stenosis and uroperitoneum, and in no cases was it necessary to reoperate. Regarding the two surgical approaches, no significant difference was observed in terms of complications. As concerns pain symptoms at 6-month follow-up evaluations on stratified data, except for dysuria, all VAS scales reported showed significant reductions between median values, for both surgery interventions. As well, significant improvements were further observed in KESS scores and overall GIQLI. Only the GIQLI evaluation was significantly smaller in the TICA group compared to CT after the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS We did not find any significant differences in terms of intra- or post-operative complications compared TICA and CT, but only a slight improvement in the Gastro-Intestinal Quality of Life Index in patients who underwent the CT compared to the TICA technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Maria Ianieri
- Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Alessandra De Cicco Nardone
- Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Antonella Carcagnì
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Research Core Facility, Gemelli Generator, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Campolo
- Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Pacelli
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Santullo
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Andres MP, Riccio LGC, Abrao HM, Manzini MS, Braga L, Abrao MS. Visual Analogue Scale Cut-off Point of Seven Represents Poor Quality of Life in Patients with Endometriosis. Reprod Sci 2024; 31:1146-1150. [PMID: 38057531 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01406-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Establishing objective criteria to assess endometriosis symptoms is crucial in defining therapeutic strategies. The visual analogue scale (VAS) is the most used system to enhance the accuracy and reduce the subjectivity of pain assessment, and symptoms of endometriosis are considered severe when the VAS score is ≥ 7 cm. Pain symptoms can significantly impact patients' quality of life, resulting in psychological and social distress. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a VAS cut-off point of 7 cm for each pain symptom correlates with a diminished quality of life in women with endometriosis. This retrospective study included 1129 patients who underwent surgical treatment for endometriosis. Dysmenorrhea, acyclic pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia, dyschezia, and dysuria were assessed using a 0-10 cm VAS. The Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire was employed to evaluate the quality of life 6 months prior to surgery. Dysmenorrhea was the most prevalent symptom reported in 93.6% of cases, with a mean VAS of 7.6 cm. The quality of life reported was reduced in most patients, with domain scores ranging from 49.4 to 80.1. The mean SF-36 scores in all domains were significantly lower in patients with severe pain (VAS score ≥ 7 cm) compared to those with mild to moderate pain (VAS < 7 cm). This trend was observed across all evaluated pain symptoms. Our research demonstrates that the prevalent VAS cut-off point for establishing severe pain symptoms in endometriosis (VAS ≥ 7 cm) accurately represents the negative impact of the disease on women's quality of life, as assessed via the SF-36 questionnaire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Paula Andres
- Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetrícia E Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Gynecologic Division, Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Luiza Gama Coelho Riccio
- Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetrícia E Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Santo Amaro, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Henrique Mendonca Abrao
- Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetrícia E Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Gynecologic Division, Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Lais Braga
- Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetrícia E Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mauricio Simoes Abrao
- Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetrícia E Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
- Gynecologic Division, Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ianieri MM, De Cicco Nardone A, Benvenga G, Greco P, Pafundi PC, Alesi MV, Campolo F, Lodoli C, Abatini C, Attalla El Halabieh M, Pacelli F, Scambia G, Santullo F. Vascular- and nerve-sparing bowel resection for deep endometriosis: A retrospective single-center study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024; 164:277-285. [PMID: 37555349 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Surgical management of bowel endometriosis is still controversial. Recently, many authors have pointed out the potential benefits of preserving the superior rectal artery, thus ensuring better perfusion of the anastomosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complication rate and functional outcomes of a bowel resection technique for deep endometriosis (DE) involving a nerve- and vascular-sparing approach. METHODS A single-center retrospective study was conducted by enrolling patients who underwent segmental resection of the rectus sigmoid for DE in our department between September 2019 and April 2022. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded for each woman, and functional outcomes relating to the pelvic organs were assessed using validated questionnaires (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom [KESS] questionnaire and Gastro-Intestinal Quality of Life Index [GIQLI] for bowel function, Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms [BFLUTS] for urinary function, and Female Sexual Function Index [FSFI] for sexual function). These were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively after 6 months from surgery. RESULTS Sixty-one patients were enrolled. No patients had Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or 4 complications, there were no rectovaginal fistulas or ureteral lesions, and in no cases was it necessary to reoperate. Temporary bladder voiding deficits were reported in 8.2% of patients, which were treated with self-catheterizations, always resolving within 45 days of surgery. Gastrointestinal function evaluated by KESS and GIQLI improved significantly after surgery, whereas sexual function appeared to worsen, although without reaching the level of statistically significant validity. CONCLUSION Our vascular- and nerve-sparing segmental bowel resection technique for DE had a low intraoperative and postoperative complication rate and produced an improvement in gastrointestinal function after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Maria Ianieri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra De Cicco Nardone
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Pia Clara Pafundi
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Research Core Facility, Gemelli Generator, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Federica Campolo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Lodoli
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Abatini
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Miriam Attalla El Halabieh
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Pacelli
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Santullo
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alborzi S, Roman H, Askary E, Poordast T, Shahraki MH, Alborzi S, Hesam Abadi AK, Najar Kolaii EH. Colorectal endometriosis: Diagnosis, surgical strategies and post-operative complications. Front Surg 2022; 9:978326. [PMID: 36268216 PMCID: PMC9577108 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.978326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The present work aimed to investigate the feasibility, complications, recurrence rate, and infertility outcomes of the radical and conservative surgical methods for colorectal endometriosis in short- and long-term follow-ups. Methods In this prospective study, the patients with confirmed diagnosis of colorectal DIE were included from March 2015 to March 2021, who were referred to an Endometriosis Surgery Center affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS). Information on demographics, surgical approaches, intra-operative, and post-operative findings as well as complications were collected and compared. Six- and 12-month interviews were conducted to evaluate the functional outcomes of all the procedures. Results Out of 3,111 patients who underwent endometriosis surgery, 837 (28.19%) with the average age of 34.2 ± 5.9 years and average ASRM score of 102.1 ± 36.8 had rectosigmoid endometriosis. Laparoscopic rectal shaving was performed in 263(30.0%) patients while 326 (37.2%) underwent segmental bowel resection, and 248 (28.30%) were treated with disc excision. Prophylactic ileostomy was performed in six (0.68%) patients and peritonitis was reported in four (0.45%). Five (0.58%) subjects developed rectovaginal fistula and one (0.11%) was diagnosed with bladder atonia. The recurrence rate was 3.8%, 1.2%, and 0.3% in rectal shaving, disc, and segmental bowel resection techniques, respectively. Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dyschezia were improved after surgery by 7.3, 9.4, and 12.5 times, respectively. We observed 25.2% of total pregnancy following the operation, the majority of which occurred in the first year after the surgery. Conclusion There were very few short-term or long-term complications in the three different techniques when the choice was correct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saeed Alborzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Laparoscopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Horace Roman
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinique Gynécologique et Obstétrical, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Elham Askary
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Infertility Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran,Correspondence: Elham Askary
| | - Tahereh Poordast
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Infertility Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | | | - Soroush Alborzi
- Cardiologist, Student Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Alimohammad Keshtvarz Hesam Abadi
- Master of Biostatistics in Clinical Research Development Center of Nemazee Hospital, Department of Statistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Darici E, Salama M, Bokor A, Oral E, Dauser B, Hudelist G. Different segmental resection techniques and postoperative complications in patients with colorectal endometriosis: A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2022; 101:705-718. [PMID: 35661342 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to analyze the available literature by conducting a systematic review to assess the possible effects of nerve-sparing segmental resection and conventional bowel resection on postoperative complications for the treatment of colorectal endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Pubmed, Clinical Trials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched from 1997 to 2021 in order to perform a systematic review. Studies including patients undergoing segmental resection for colorectal endometriosis including adequate follow-up, data on postoperative complications and postoperative sequelae were enrolled in this review. Selected articles were evaluated and divided in two groups: Nerve-sparing resection (NSR), and conventional segmental resection not otherwise specified (SRNOS). Within the NSRs, studies mentioning preservation of the rectal artery supply (artery and nerve-sparing SR - ANSR) and not reporting preservation of the artery supply (NSR not otherwise specified - NSRNOS) were further analyzed. PROSPERO ID CRD42021250974. RESULTS A total of 7549 patients from 63 studies were included in the data analysis. Forty-three of these publications did not mention the preservation or the removal of the hypogastric nerve plexus, or main rectal artery supply and were summarized as SRNOS. The remaining 22 studies were listed under the NSR group. The mean size of the resected deep endometriosis lesions and patients' body mass index were comparable between SRNOS and NSR. A mean of 3.6% (0-16.6) and 2.3% (0-10.5%) of rectovaginal fistula development was reported in patients who underwent SRNOS and NSR, respectively. Anastomotic leakage rates varied from 0% to 8.6% (mean 1.7 ± 2%) in SRNOS compared with 0% to 8% (mean 1.7 ± 2%) in patients undergoing NSR. Urinary retention (4.5% and 4.9%) and long-term bladder catheterization (4.9% and 5.6%) were frequently reported in SRNOS and NSR. There was insufficient information about pain or the recurrence rates for women undergoing SRNOS and NSR. CONCLUSIONS Current data describe the outcomes of different segmental resection techniques. However, the data are inhomogeneous and not sufficient to reach a conclusion regarding a possible advantage of one technique over the other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ezgi Darici
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Zeynep Kâmil Women and Children's Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.,European Endometriosis League, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mohamed Salama
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nord Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Attila Bokor
- European Endometriosis League, Bordeaux, France.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Engin Oral
- European Endometriosis League, Bordeaux, France.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bernhard Dauser
- Department of General Surgery, Center for Endometriosis, Hospital St. John of God, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gernot Hudelist
- European Endometriosis League, Bordeaux, France.,Center for Endometriosis, Department of Gynecology, Hospital St. John of God, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Adenomyosis is an independent risk factor for complications in deep endometriosis laparoscopic surgery. Sci Rep 2022; 12:7086. [PMID: 35490172 PMCID: PMC9056502 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11179-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep endometriosis (DE) occurs in 15-30% of patients with endometriosis and is associated with concomitant adenomyosis in around 25-49% of cases. There are no data about the effect of the presence of adenomyosis in terms of surgical outcomes and complications. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of adenomyosis on surgical complications in women with deep endometriosis undergoing laparoscopic surgery. A retrospective cohort study including women referred to the endometriosis unit of a referral teaching hospital. Two expert sonographers preoperatively diagnosed DE and adenomyosis. DE was defined according to the criteria of the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis group. Adenomyosis was considered when 3 or more ultrasound criteria of the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment group were present. Demographical variables, current medical treatment, symptoms, DE location, surgical time, hospital stay and difference in pre and post hemoglobin levels were collected. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to assess surgical complications, and multivariate analysis was performed to compare patients with and without adenomyosis. 157 DE patients were included into the study; 77 (49.05%) had adenomyosis according to transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) and were classified in the A group, and 80 (50.95%) had no adenomyosis and were classified in the noA group. Adenomyosis was associated with a higher rate of surgical complications: 33.76% (A group) vs. 12.50% (noA group) (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a 4.56-fold increased risk of presenting complications in women with adenomyosis (CI 1.90-11.30; p = 0.001) independently of undergoing hysterectomy. There was a statistically significant association between the number of criteria of adenomyosis present in each patient and the proportion of patients presenting surgical complications (p < 0.001). Adenomyosis is an independent preoperative risk factor for surgical complications in DE surgery after adjustment for known demographic, clinical and surgical risk factors.
Collapse
|
9
|
Andres MP, Souza C, Villaescusa M, Vieira M, Abrao MS. The current role of robotic surgery in endometriosis management. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 2022; 17:63-73. [PMID: 35073819 DOI: 10.1080/17446651.2022.2031976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects approximately 10%-15% of women of childbearing age. Laparoscopic surgery is the preferred surgical approach. Recently, robotic surgery has been used for benign gynecologic surgery, but its role in the treatment of endometriosis is still unknown. AREAS COVERED We included studies that evaluated the outcomes of robotic surgery for endometriosis. Using the keywords 'endometriosis' and 'robotics', a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed in July 2021. EXPERT OPINION Robotic surgery for endometriosis has similar outcomes as conventional laparoscopy, with no evidence of increased complication rates. Despite the non-inferiority of the surgical route, the associated costs of robotic surgery limit its availability. Rapid development of robot-assisted surgery necessitates long-term prospective randomized controlled trials. However, the limitations of robotic surgery should not be overlooked. If robotic surgery can facilitate the spread of minimally invasive surgery, it will be necessary to evaluate the cost, availability, complexity of the lesions, and most importantly, the results of patient satisfaction and values of value-based medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Paula Andres
- Departamento de Obstetricia E Ginecologia, Hospital Das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Division of Gynecologic, BP - A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Carolina Souza
- Division of Gynecologic, BP - A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marina Villaescusa
- Division of Gynecologic, BP - A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Vieira
- Gynecologic Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital/Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mauricio S Abrao
- Departamento de Obstetricia E Ginecologia, Hospital Das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Division of Gynecologic, BP - A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Popoutchi P, Marques Junior OW, Averbach P, Cardoso Filho CAM, Averbach M. SURGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR THE TREATMENT OF RECTAL ENDOMETRIOSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AND OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2021; 58:548-559. [PMID: 34909864 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.202100000-97] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometriosis is a common disease in reproductive-age women and it is estimated to occur in up to 50% of those with infertility. Intestinal involvement is reported in up to a third of the cases. This condition is related to chronic pain and loss of quality of life, resulting in emotional, social and economic costs. Treatment consists of hormonal block and surgical resection, with variable side effects and efficacy. The best choice for surgical treatment for rectal endometriosis is a matter of discussion regarding the indication and the best technique to be employed. OBJECTIVE To summarize data on indications, results and complications of surgical techniques for the treatment of rectal endometriosis. METHODS This comprehensive systematic review is a compilation of the available literature and discussion, carried out by a team with experience in the surgical treatment of intestinal endometriosis. Data regarding indications, results and complications of conservative and radical techniques for the surgical treatment of rectal endometriosis was carefully reviewed. Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL up to May 2021 were performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared at least two of the three surgical techniques of interest (i.e., shaving, discoid resection, segmental resection). RESULTS One RCT and nine case series studies with a total of 3,327 patients met the eligibility criteria. Participants ages ranged from a mean of 30.0 to 37.9 years old. Mean follow-up ranged from 1.2 to 42.76 months. With regards the methodological quality, overall the included studies presented a low risk of bias in the majority of the domains. Surgical treatment of rectal endometriosis is indicated for patients with obstructive symptoms and those with pain scores above 7/10. Patients with disease involving beyond muscularis propria of the rectum, documented in magnetic resonance imaging or transvaginal pelvic ultrasound with intestinal preparation, are candidates for discoid or segmental resection. The presence of multifocal disease, extension greater than 3 cm and infiltration greater than 50% of the loop circumference favor the radical technique. The distance from the lesion to the anal verge, age, symptoms and reproductive desire are other factors that influence the choice of the technique to be employed. The risk of complications and unfavorable functional results seems to be directly related to the complexity of the procedure. CONCLUSION The choice of surgical technique performed for the treatment of rectal endometriosis is a matter of discussion and depends not only on the preoperative staging, but also on the patient's expectations, risks and potential complications, recurrence rates and the expertise of the multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Popoutchi
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Oswaldo Wiliam Marques Junior
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.,Fundação Antônio Prudente - A.C.Camargo Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Pedro Averbach
- Disciplina de Coloproctologia, Departamento de Gastroenterologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Celso Augusto Milani Cardoso Filho
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.,Fundação Antônio Prudente - A.C.Camargo Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Marcelo Averbach
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abrao MS, Andres MP, Miller CE, Gingold JA, Rius M, Neto JS, Carmona F. AAGL 2021 Endometriosis Classification: An Anatomy-based Surgical Complexity Score. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021; 28:1941-1950.e1. [PMID: 34583009 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.09.709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To develop a new endometriosis classification system for scoring intraoperative surgical complexity and to examine its correlation with patient-reported pain and infertility. DESIGN Multicenter study of patients treated at 3 recognized endometriosis centers. SETTING Three specialized endometriosis surgical centers in São Paulo, Brazil and Barcelona, Spain. PATIENTS Patients aged 15 to 45 years with histologically proven endometriosis and no history of pelvic malignancy underwent laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis. INTERVENTIONS Demographic data and clinical history, including dysmenorrhea, noncyclic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysuria and dyschezia, were prospectively recorded. All patients were staged surgically according to the new 2021 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) classification systems. The staging for each system was compared against a 4-level surgical complexity scale defined by the most complex procedure performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS A total of 1224 patients undergoing surgery met inclusion criteria. The AAGL score discriminated between 4 stages of surgical complexity with high reproducibility (κ = 0.621), whereas the ASRM score discriminated between the complexity stages with poor reproducibility (κ = 0.317). The AAGL staging system correlated with dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschezia, total pain score, and infertility comparably with the ASRM staging system. CONCLUSION The AAGL 2021 Endometriosis Classification allows for identifying objective intraoperative findings that reliably discriminate surgical complexity levels better than the ASRM staging system. The AAGL severity stage correlates comparably with pain and infertility symptoms with the ASRM stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio S Abrao
- Gynecologic Division, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo (Drs. Abrao, Andres, and Neto); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (Drs. Abrao and Andres), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Clinical Sciences, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago (Dr. Miller); Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge (Dr. Miller), Illinois; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York (Dr. Gingold); Department of Gynecology, Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Drs. Rius and Carmona); Department of Gynecology, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (Dr. Carmona), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Marina Paula Andres
- Gynecologic Division, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo (Drs. Abrao, Andres, and Neto); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (Drs. Abrao and Andres), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Clinical Sciences, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago (Dr. Miller); Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge (Dr. Miller), Illinois; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York (Dr. Gingold); Department of Gynecology, Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Drs. Rius and Carmona); Department of Gynecology, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (Dr. Carmona), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Charles E Miller
- Gynecologic Division, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo (Drs. Abrao, Andres, and Neto); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (Drs. Abrao and Andres), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Clinical Sciences, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago (Dr. Miller); Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge (Dr. Miller), Illinois; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York (Dr. Gingold); Department of Gynecology, Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Drs. Rius and Carmona); Department of Gynecology, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (Dr. Carmona), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julian A Gingold
- Gynecologic Division, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo (Drs. Abrao, Andres, and Neto); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (Drs. Abrao and Andres), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Clinical Sciences, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago (Dr. Miller); Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge (Dr. Miller), Illinois; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York (Dr. Gingold); Department of Gynecology, Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Drs. Rius and Carmona); Department of Gynecology, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (Dr. Carmona), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mariona Rius
- Gynecologic Division, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo (Drs. Abrao, Andres, and Neto); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (Drs. Abrao and Andres), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Clinical Sciences, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago (Dr. Miller); Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge (Dr. Miller), Illinois; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York (Dr. Gingold); Department of Gynecology, Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Drs. Rius and Carmona); Department of Gynecology, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (Dr. Carmona), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joao Siufi Neto
- Gynecologic Division, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo (Drs. Abrao, Andres, and Neto); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (Drs. Abrao and Andres), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Clinical Sciences, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago (Dr. Miller); Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge (Dr. Miller), Illinois; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York (Dr. Gingold); Department of Gynecology, Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Drs. Rius and Carmona); Department of Gynecology, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (Dr. Carmona), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisco Carmona
- Gynecologic Division, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo (Drs. Abrao, Andres, and Neto); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (Drs. Abrao and Andres), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Clinical Sciences, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago (Dr. Miller); Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge (Dr. Miller), Illinois; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York (Dr. Gingold); Department of Gynecology, Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Drs. Rius and Carmona); Department of Gynecology, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (Dr. Carmona), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Puppo A, Olearo E, Gattolin A, Rimonda R, Novelli A, Ceccaroni M. Intraoperative Ultrasound for Bowel Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Preliminary Report. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2021; 40:1417-1425. [PMID: 32991006 DOI: 10.1002/jum.15511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The decision to perform either conservative surgery or segmental bowel resection for bowel deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is made intraoperatively, after a preoperative assessment, based on the nodule's features. We introduce a technique to evaluate DIE bowel nodules using laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasound (US) during laparoscopic radical treatment of 9 cases of DIE invading the bowel. Once the bowel lesion was isolated, an intraoperative 12-4-MHz US transducer was placed on the surface of the nodules to study their US features and to gain measurements. Deep infiltrating endometriosis nodules appear at intraoperative US as hypoechoic elliptical lesions with a clear definition of margins and the depth of infiltration of the rectal wall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Puppo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Regina Montis Regalis Hospital, Mondovi, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Elena Olearo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Regina Montis Regalis Hospital, Mondovi, Italy
| | - Andrea Gattolin
- Department of General Surgery, Regina Montis Regalis Hospital, Mondovi, Italy
| | - Roberto Rimonda
- Department of General Surgery, Regina Montis Regalis Hospital, Mondovi, Italy
| | - Antonia Novelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Regina Montis Regalis Hospital, Mondovi, Italy
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Women and Child Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceccaroni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Goncalves MO, Siufi Neto J, Andres MP, Siufi D, de Mattos LA, Abrao MS. Systematic evaluation of endometriosis by transvaginal ultrasound can accurately replace diagnostic laparoscopy, mainly for deep and ovarian endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2021; 36:1492-1500. [PMID: 33864088 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the sensitivity and the specificity of preoperative transvaginal ultrasound with bowel preparation (TVUS-BP) compared to diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) for the identification of ovarian and deep sites of endometriosis? SUMMARY ANSWER DL was able to detect retrocervical, ovarian, and bladder endometriosis with similar sensitivity and specificity as TVUS-BP, whereas for vaginal and rectosigmoid endometriosis, DL had lower sensitivity and specificity than TVUS-BP. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY TVUS-BP is a non-invasive examination with good accuracy for diagnosing ovarian and deep endometriosis. DL is expensive and can lead to surgical complications. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This prospective study included a total of 120 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for suspected endometriosis with preoperative imaging (TVUS-BP), including a video of the laparoscopic procedure, between March 2017 and September 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Two radiologists performed preoperative TVUS-BP using the same protocol for diagnosing endometriosis. Two surgeons, who were blinded to the results of the preoperative imaging and clinical data, reviewed the surgical videos from the entry of the abdominal cavity until the surgeon finalized a complete and systematic review prior to beginning any dissection (considered as a DL). A data sheet was used by surgeons and radiologists to record the sites and size of disease involvement, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) stage, and the Enzian score. The surgical visualization of endometriosis lesions that were confirmed by histological analysis was the gold standard. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE DL was able to detect retrocervical, ovarian, and bladder endometriosis with similar sensitivity and specificity as TVUS-BP. DL was not able to detect vaginal endometriosis (sensitivity and specificity 0%): this is compared to a sensitivity and specificity of 85.7% and 99.1%, respectively with the utilization of a preoperative TVUS-BP. In addition, DL was notably poor at detecting rectosigmoid endometriosis, with a sensitivity of 3.7-5.6%, and this compares to 96.3% sensitivity with utilization of a preoperative TVUS (P < 0.001). For the ASRM stage, TVUS-BP results were highly correlated with the degree of endometriosis and pouch of Douglas (POD) obliteration (weighted Kappa of 0.867 and 0.985, respectively). For the Enzian score, there was a substantial correlation between TVUSP-BP and DL for compartment A (weighted Kappa = 0.827), compartment B (weighted Kappa = 0.670), and compartment C (weighted kappa = 0.814). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The number of participants included may be a limitation in this study and, as the evaluators were blinded to the physical exam, the DL accuracy could be underestimated. As biopsies of pelvic organs were obtained only if there was a suspicion of endometriosis, the gold standard was not always applicable. This aspect could underestimate the prevalence of lesions and overestimate the sensitivity and the specificity of both the TVUS-BP and the DL. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Preoperative TVUS-BP was accurate in identifying all sites of ovarian and deep endometriosis that were evaluated. It had significantly higher sensitivity than DL in detecting rectosigmoid endometriosis and predicting intraoperative ASRM staging and the Enzian score. These results suggest that TVUS-BP can replace DL for the diagnosis and treatment planning for patients with ovarian and deep endometriosis. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The authors declare no source of funding or conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joao Siufi Neto
- Gynecologic Division, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Marina Paula Andres
- Gynecologic Division, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Daniela Siufi
- Gynecologic Division, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Leandro Accardo de Mattos
- Female Pelvic Diagnostic Section, Alta Medicina Diagnostica, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Department of Imaging Diagnosis, Escola Paulista de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Mauricio S Abrao
- Gynecologic Division, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Metzemaekers J, Haazebroek P, Smeets MJGH, English J, Blikkendaal MD, Twijnstra ARH, Adamson GD, Keckstein J, Jansen FW. EQUSUM: Endometriosis QUality and grading instrument for SUrgical performance: proof of concept study for automatic digital registration and classification scoring for r-ASRM, EFI and Enzian. Hum Reprod Open 2020; 2020:hoaa053. [PMID: 33409380 PMCID: PMC7772248 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is electronic digital classification/staging of endometriosis by the EQUSUM application more accurate in calculating the scores/stages and is it easier to use compared to non-digital classification? SUMMARY ANSWER We developed the first digital visual classification system in endometriosis (EQUSUM). This merges the three currently most frequently used separate endometriosis classification/scoring systems (i.e. revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM), Enzian and Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI)) to allow uniform and adequate classification and registration, which is easy to use. The EQUSUM showed significant improvement in correctly classifying/scoring endometriosis and is more user-friendly compared to non-digital classification. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Endometriosis classification is complex and until better classification systems are developed and validated, ideally all women with endometriosis undergoing surgery should have a correct rASRM score and stage, while women with deep endometriosis (DE) should have an Enzian classification and if there is a fertility wish, the EFI score should be calculated. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION A prospective endometriosis classification proof of concept study under experts in deep endometriosis was conducted. A comparison was made between currently used non-digital classification formats for endometriosis versus a newly developed digital classification application (EQUSUM). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS A hypothetical operative endometriosis case was created and summarized in both non-digital and digital form. During European endometriosis expert meetings, 45 DE experts were randomly assigned to the classic group versus the digital group to provide a proper classification of this DE case. Each expert was asked to provide the rASRM score and stage, Enzian and EFI score. Twenty classic forms and 20 digital forms were analysed. Questions about the user-friendliness (system usability scale (SUS) and subjective mental effort questionnaire (SMEQ)) of both systems were collected. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The rASRM stage was scored completely correctly by 10% of the experts in the classic group compared to 75% in the EQUSUM group (P < 0. 01). The rASRM numerical score was calculated correctly by none of the experts in the classic group compared with 70% in the EQUSUM group (P < 0.01). The Enzian score was correct in 60% of the classic group compared to 90% in the EQUSUM group (P = 0.03). EFI scores were calculated correctly in 25% of the classic group versus 85% in the EQUSUM group (P < 0.01). Finally, the usability measured with the SUS was significantly better in the EQUSUM group compared to the classic group: 80.8 ± 11.4 and 61.3 ± 20.5 (P < 0.01). Also the mental effort measured with the SMEQ was significant lower in the EQUSUM group compared to the classic group: 52.1 ± 18.7 and 71.0 ± 29.1 (P = 0.04). Future research should further develop and confirm these initial findings by conducting similar studies with larger study groups, to limit the possible role of chance. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION These first results are promising, however it is important to note that this is a preliminary result of experts in DE and needs further testing in daily practice with different types (complex and easy) of endometriosis cases and less experienced gynaecologists in endometriosis surgery. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This is the first time that the rASRM, Enzian and EFI are combined in one web-based application to simplify correct and automatic endometriosis classification/scoring and surgical registration through infographics. Collection of standardized data with the EQUSUM could improve endometriosis reporting and increase the uniformity of scientific output. However, this requires a broad implementation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS To launch the EQUSUM application, a one-time financial support was provided by Medtronic to cover the implementation cost. No competing interests were declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Metzemaekers
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P Haazebroek
- Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M J G H Smeets
- Department of Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum-Bronovo, Den Haag, the Netherlands
| | - J English
- Department of Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum-Bronovo, Den Haag, the Netherlands
| | - M D Blikkendaal
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - A R H Twijnstra
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - J Keckstein
- Stiftung Endometrioseforschung (SEF), Westerstede,Germany
- Gynecological Clinic Drs. Keckstein, Villach, Austria
| | - F W Jansen
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
McKee D, Young S, Magtibay P, Wasson M. Intraoperative Deep Pelvic Ultrasound for Detection of Ileocecal Endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 28:1125-1127. [PMID: 33279626 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dana McKee
- Department of Medical and Surgical Gynecology (Drs. McKee, Magtibay, and Wasson), Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.
| | - Scott Young
- Diagnostic Radiology (Dr. Young), Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Paul Magtibay
- Department of Medical and Surgical Gynecology (Drs. McKee, Magtibay, and Wasson), Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Megan Wasson
- Department of Medical and Surgical Gynecology (Drs. McKee, Magtibay, and Wasson), Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bendifallah S, Puchar A, Vesale E, Moawad G, Daraï E, Roman H. Surgical Outcomes after Colorectal Surgery for Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 28:453-466. [PMID: 32841755 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of type of surgery for colorectal endometriosis-rectal shaving or discoid resection or segmental colorectal resection-on complications and surgical outcomes. DATA SOURCES We performed a systematic review of all English- and French-language full-text articles addressing the surgical management of colorectal endometriosis, and compared the postoperative complications according to surgical technique by meta-analysis. The PubMed, Clinical Trials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies published before March 27, 2020. The search strategy used the following Medical Subject Headings terms: ("bowel endometriosis" or "colorectal endometriosis") AND ("surgery for endometriosis" or "conservative management" or "radical management" or "colorectal resection" or "shaving" or "full thickness resection" or "disc excision") AND ("treatment", "outcomes", "long term results" and "complications"). METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION Two authors conducted the literature search and independently screened abstracts for inclusion, with resolution of any difference by 3 other authors. Studies were included if data on surgical management (shaving, disc excision, and/or segmental resection) were provided and if postoperative outcomes were detailed with at least the number of complications. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane recommendations. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Of the 168 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 60 were included in the qualitative synthesis. Seventeen of these were included in the meta-analysis on rectovaginal fistula, 10 on anastomotic leakage, 5 on anastomotic stenosis, and 9 on voiding dysfunction <30 days. The mean complication rate according to shaving, disc excision, and segmental resection were 2.2%, 9.7%, and 9.9%, respectively. Rectal shaving was less associated with rectovaginal fistula than disc excision (odds ratio [OR] = 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.36; p <.001; I2 = 33%) and segmental colorectal resection (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15-0.44; p <.001; I2 = 0%). No difference was found in the occurrence of rectovaginal fistula between disc excision and segmental colorectal resection (OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.70-1.63; p = .76; I2 = 0%). Rectal shaving was less associated with leakage than disc excision (OR = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06-0.73; p = .01; I2 = 86%). No difference was found in the occurrence of leakage between rectal shaving and segmental colorectal resection (OR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.10-1.01; p = .05; I2 = 71%) or between disc excision and segmental colorectal resection (OR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.30-1.58; p = .38; I2 = 0%). Disc excision was less associated with anastomotic stenosis than segmental resection (OR = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.48; p = .001; I2 = 59%). Disc excision was associated with more voiding dysfunction <30 days than rectal shaving (OR = 12.9; 95% CI, 1.40-119.34; p = .02; I2 = 0%). No difference was found in the occurrence of voiding dysfunction <30 days between segmental resection and rectal shaving (OR = 3.05; 95% CI, 0.55-16.87; p = .20; I2 = 0%) or between segmental colorectal and discoid resections (OR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.54-1.85; p = .99; I2 = 71%). CONCLUSION Colorectal surgery for endometriosis exposes patients to a risk of severe complications such as rectovaginal fistula, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, and voiding dysfunction. Rectal shaving seems to be less associated with postoperative complications than disc excision and segmental colorectal resection. However, this technique is not suitable for all patients with large bowel infiltration. Compared with segmental colorectal resection, disc excision has several advantages, including shorter operating time, shorter hospital stay, and lower risk of postoperative bowel stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (Drs. Bendifallah, Puchar, Vesale, and Daraï); UMRS-938 (Drs. Bendifallah and Daraï); Groupe de Recherche Clinique 6, Centre Expert En Endométriose (Drs. Bendifallah and Daraï), Sorbonne University, Paris
| | - Anne Puchar
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (Drs. Bendifallah, Puchar, Vesale, and Daraï)
| | - Elie Vesale
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (Drs. Bendifallah, Puchar, Vesale, and Daraï)
| | - Gaby Moawad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia (Dr. Moawad)
| | - Emile Daraï
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (Drs. Bendifallah, Puchar, Vesale, and Daraï); UMRS-938 (Drs. Bendifallah and Daraï); Groupe de Recherche Clinique 6, Centre Expert En Endométriose (Drs. Bendifallah and Daraï), Sorbonne University, Paris
| | - Horace Roman
- Endometriosis Centre, Clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux (Dr Roman), France; Department of Surgical Gynaecology, University Hospital of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark (Dr. Roman).
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chamié LP. Ultrasound evaluation of deeply infiltrative endometriosis: technique and interpretation. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:1648-1658. [PMID: 31740997 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02322-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Endometriosis is a common benign gynecological condition defined as the presence of endometrial tissue located outside the uterus and frequently associated with chronic pelvic pain and infertility. It is a polymorphic disease that can be presented as superficial implants, endometriomas and deep lesions that infiltrate the peritoneal surface associated with fibrosis and inflammatory reaction. Diagnosis of deep endometriosis is difficult and delayed, frequently missed in a routine ultrasound. Transvaginal ultrasound is the first-line imaging modality to investigate endometriosis and when performed by an expert in female pelvic imaging can provide a reliable mapping of the affected sites. Bowel preparation can be used to improve the detection of bowel lesions as well as the other sites affected by eliminating artifacts. Surgery has been the mainstay to treat symptomatic endometriosis and preoperative imaging mapping is crucial for better results and to reduce residual disease. The goals of surgery include radical removal of all lesions and the restoration of normal pelvic anatomy. The author describes technical aspects and imaging interpretation of the transvaginal sonography to investigate deeply infiltrative endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciana Pardini Chamié
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chamié Imagem da Mulher, Rua Casa do Ator, 1117, cj 72, São Paulo, São Paulo, 04546-004, Brazil.
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Fleury Medicina e Saúde, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|