Improved Rates of Same-day Discharge in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Following the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Impact of COVID-19 on Breast Cancer Care: A Qualitative Analysis of Surgeons' Perspectives

INTRODUCTION

While studies have documented delays in breast cancer (BC) care during the COVID-19 pandemic due to healthcare restrictions, there have been no studies on the experiences, and, particularly, the challenges with providing care faced by breast surgeons during this unprecedented time. This paper aims to understand the perspectives of breast surgeons regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on BC care.

METHODS

We used purposeful and snowball sampling to identify breast surgeons in Ontario, Canada. One-on-one qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted exploring the impact of the pandemic on BC treatment, psychosocial well-being of patients and providers, and the future state of BC care. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Thematic Analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 10 breast surgeons (5 community and 5 academic) were interviewed. Breast surgeons reported that the pandemic led to increased multidisciplinary collaboration and innovations in delivery of BC surgery (e.g., increased use of regional anesthesia). Multiple surgeons identified that the pandemic created disparities in BC care based geographic location and that existing disparities in care based on ethnicity or marginalization were exacerbated. Last, surgeons identified that virtual care improved, but also created some challenges to how BC care was delivered, with many hoping for this to be continued after the pandemic was over.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, breast surgeons identified unique challenges and solutions to BC care delivery during the pandemic. Concerns regarding disparities in care based on geographic location and marginalized patients require further study to improve future BC care.

Sustainability of an enhanced recovery pathway after minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery

OBJECTIVE

Same day discharge is safe after minimally invasive gynecology oncology surgery. Our quality improvement peri-operative program based on enhanced recovery after surgery principles led to an increase in same day discharge from 30% to 75% over a 12 month period. Twelve months after program implementation, we assessed the sustainability of same day discharge rates, determined post-operative complication rates, and evaluated factors affecting same day discharge rates.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of 100 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery at an academic cancer center from January to 2021 to December 2021. This cohort was compared with the active intervention cohort (n=102) from the implementation period (January 2020 to December 2020). Same day discharge rates and complications were compared. Multivariable analysis was performed to assess which factors remained associated with same day discharge post-intervention.

RESULTS

Same day discharge post-intervention was 72% compared with 75% during active intervention (p=0.69). Both cohorts were similar in age (p=0.24) and body mass index (p=0.27), but the post-intervention cohort had longer operative times (p=0.001). There were no significant differences in 30-day complications, readmission, reoperation, or emergency room visits (p>0.05). There was a decrease in 30-day post-operative clinic visits from 18% to 5% in the post-intervention cohort (p=0.007), and unnecessary bowel prep use decreased from 35% to 14% (p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, start time (second case of the day) (OR 0.06; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.35), and ward narcotic use (OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.42) remained associated with overnight admission.

CONCLUSION

Same day discharge rate was sustained at 72%, 12 months after the implementation of a quality improvement program to optimize same day discharge rate after minimally invasive surgery, while maintaining low post-operative complications and reducing unplanned clinic visits. To maximize same day discharge, minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery should be prioritized as the first case of the day, and post-operative narcotic use should be limited.

Not All Bad Comes to Harm: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Rectosigmoid Endometriosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on the length of hospitalization in women undergoing laparoscopy for rectosigmoid deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

An academic referral center for endometriosis and minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

PATIENTS

Women aged between 18 and 50 years scheduled for laparoscopic excision (shaving, full-thickness anterior wall resection, segmental resection) of rectosigmoid endometriosis between February 2017 and February 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

We divided patients into 2 groups (non-ERAS and ERAS) based on the timing of surgery (before or after March 5, 2020). Starting from this day, restrictions were issued to limit the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, inducing our group to implement an ERAS protocol for patients hospitalized after surgery for posterior DIE.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We included 579 patients in the analysis, 316 (54.6%) in the non-ERAS group and 263 (45.4%) in the ERAS group. In the ERAS group, we observed a shorter length of hospital stay (5.8 ± 3.1 days vs 4.8 ± 2.9 days; p <.001) and lower complications rates (33, 12.5% vs 60, 19.0%; p = .04), despite a decreased frequency of conservative surgical approaches (shaving procedures 121 vs 196; p <.001). Repeated surgery or hospital readmissions owing to postdischarge complications were infrequent, with no significant differences between the 2 groups. The multiple linear regression analysis strengthened our results given the higher prevalence of bowel resection surgeries (both full-thickness anterior wall or segmental), showing that patients managed with a multimodal protocol had an overall reduction of hospital stay by 1.5 days.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of an ERAS program in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for DIE is associated with a significant reduction in hospital stay, without an increase in perioperative or postoperative complication rates.

Identifying Risk Factors for Complication and Readmission with Same-Day Discharge Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic caused a surge of same-day discharge (SDD) for total joint arthroplasty. However, SDD may not be beneficial for all patients. Therefore, continued investigation into the safety of SDD is necessary as well as risk stratification for improved patient outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study examined 31,851 elective SDD hip and knee arthroplasties from 2016 to 2020 in a large national database. Logistic regression models were used to identify patient variables and preoperative comorbidities that contribute to postoperative complication or readmission with SDD. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

SDD increased from 1.4% in 2016 to 14.6% in 2020. SDD is associated with lower odds of readmission (AOR: 0.994, CI: 0.992-0.996) and postoperative complications (AOR: 0.998, CI: 0.997-1.000). Patients who have preoperative dyspnea (AOR: 1.03, CI: 1.02-1.04, P < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AOR: 1.02, CI: 1.01-1.03, P = .002), and hypoalbuminemia (AOR: 1.02, CI: 1.00-1.03, P < .001), had higher odds of postoperative complications. Patients who had preoperative dyspnea (AOR: 1.02, CI: 1.01-1.03), hypertension (AOR: 1.01, CI: 1.01-1.03, P = .003), chronic corticosteroid use (AOR: 1.02, CI: 1.01-1.03, P < .001), bleeding disorder (AOR: 1.02; CI: 1.01-1.03, P < .001), and hypoalbuminemia (AOR: 1.01, CI: 1.00-1.02, P = .038), had higher odds of readmission.

CONCLUSION

SDD is safe with certain comorbidities. Preoperative screening for cardiopulmonary comorbidities (eg, dyspnea, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), chronic corticosteroid use, bleeding disorder, and hypoalbuminemia may improve SDD outcomes.

Same-day Discharge after Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions: Feasibility and Safety

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility and predictive factors for same-day discharge (SDD) after robotic hysterectomy (RH) for benign indications to optimize patient selection by incorporating preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables.

DESIGN

A single-center retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing RH for benign indications.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were designated for SDD by implementing enhanced recovery after surgery protocol.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The study included 890 patients who underwent RH for benign indications between the years 2016 and 2021. Of these, 618 (69.4%) were discharged the same day and 272 (30.5%) were admitted for overnight stay. Both groups had similar age (46.4 vs 46.2 years), body mass index (28.3 vs 28.9), and indications for surgery. In multivariable logistic regression, factors that were significant for overnight stay were American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3, Charlson comorbidity index, previous laparotomy, and operative time. Other factors such as surgery start time and preoperative hemoglobin levels were not statistically significant. Postoperative outcomes were comparable for both groups with similar readmission and reoperation rates.

CONCLUSION

The likelihood of SDD after RH in this cohort after implementing enhanced recovery after surgery protocol was almost 70%, and most of the predictive factors for overnight stay were nonmodifiable. Importantly, both groups had similar outcomes after surgery.