A DNA real-time quantitative PCR method suitable for routine monitoring of low levels of minimal residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia

Rapid detection of myeloid neoplasm fusions using single-molecule long-read sequencing

Recurrent gene fusions are common drivers of disease pathophysiology in leukemias. Identifying these structural variants helps stratify disease by risk and assists with therapy choice. Precise molecular diagnosis in low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC) is challenging given the complexity of assays, trained technical support, and the availability of reliable electricity. Current fusion detection methods require a long turnaround time (7-10 days) or advance knowledge of the genes involved in the fusions. Recent technology developments have made sequencing possible without a sophisticated molecular laboratory, potentially making molecular diagnosis accessible to remote areas and low-income settings. We describe a long-read sequencing DNA assay designed with CRISPR guides to select and enrich for recurrent leukemia fusion genes, that does not need a priori knowledge of the abnormality present. By applying rapid sequencing technology based on nanopores, we sequenced long pieces of genomic DNA and successfully detected fusion genes in cell lines and primary specimens (e.g., BCR::ABL1, PML::RARA, CBFB::MYH11, KMT2A::AFF1) using cloud-based bioinformatics workflows with novel custom fusion finder software. We detected fusion genes in 100% of cell lines with the expected breakpoints and confirmed the presence or absence of a recurrent fusion gene in 12 of 14 patient cases. With our optimized assay and cloud-based bioinformatics workflow, these assays and analyses could be performed in under 8 hours. The platform's portability, potential for adaptation to lower-cost devices, and integrated cloud analysis make this assay a candidate to be placed in settings like LMIC to bridge the need of bedside rapid molecular diagnostics.

Functional expression cloning of molecules inducing CD34 expression in bone marrow-derived stromal myofibroblasts

We have previously shown a fraction of stromal fibroblasts/myofibroblasts (Fibs) from leukemic bone marrow cells expresses leukemia-specific transcripts along with hematopoietic and Fib-related markers. Normal bone marrow-derived Fibs (nFibs) do not express CD34 or CD45; however, nFibs may express hematopoietic markers with some specific stimulations. CD34 expression was detected in nFib cultures following the addition of a culture supernatant of blood mononuclear cells stimulated with phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-P. To identify the molecules responsible for inducing CD34 expression in nFibs, cDNA clones were isolated using functional expression cloning with a library constructed from PHA-P-stimulated human blood mononuclear cells. Positive clones inducing CD34 transcription in nFibs were selected. We confirmed that an isolated positive cDNA clone encoded human interleukin (IL)-1 beta (β). CD34 expression was observed in the nFib cultures with recombinant human (rh) IL-1β protein. And CD34 transcription was suppressed when a rhIL-1β neutralizing antibody was added to the IL-1β-stimulated nFib cultures. nFibs expressed gp130 and IL-6 receptors, and CD45 expression was detected in nFibs cultured with rhIL-1β and rhIL-6. Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cells reportedly respond well to IL-1β. When CML-derived Fibs were cultured with rhIL-1β and rhIL-6, CD45-positive cells increased in number. Cell fate may be influenced by an external specific stimulation without gene introduction.

Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Recent Advances

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm caused by the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene generation as a consequence of the t(9;22)(q34;q11) rearrangement. The identification of the BCR-ABL1 transcript was of critical importance for both CML diagnosis and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. In this review, we report the recent advances in the CML MRD monitoring based on RNA, DNA and protein analysis. The detection of the BCR-ABL1 transcript by the quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction is the gold standard method, but other systems based on digital PCR or on GeneXpert technology have been developed. In the last years, DNA-based assays showed high sensitivity and specificity, and flow cytometric approaches for the detection of the BCR-ABL1 fusion protein have also been tested. Recently, new MRD monitoring systems based on the detection of molecular markers other than the BCR-ABL1 fusion were proposed. These approaches, such as the identification of CD26+ leukemic stem cells, microRNAs and mitochondrial DNA mutations, just remain preliminary and need to be implemented. In the precision medicine era, the constant improvement of the CML MRD monitoring practice could allow clinicians to choose the best therapeutic algorithm and a more accurate selection of CML patients eligible for the tyrosine kinase inhibitors discontinuation.

Large amplicon droplet digital PCR for DNA-based monitoring of pediatric chronic myeloid leukaemia

Quantification of tumour‐specific molecular markers at the RNA and DNA level for treatment response monitoring is crucial for risk‐adapted stratification and guidance of individualized therapy in leukaemia and other malignancies. Most pediatric leukaemias and solid tumours of mesenchymal origin are characterized by a relatively low mutation burden at the single nucleotide level and the presence of recurrent chromosomal translocations. The genomic fusion sites resulting from translocations are stable molecular tumour markers; however, repeat‐rich DNA sequences flanking intronic breakpoints limit the design of high sensitivity PCR assays for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. Here, we quantitatively evaluated the impact of repeat elements on assay selection and the feasibility of using extended amplicons (≤1330 bp) amplified by droplet digital PCR to monitor pediatric chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Molecular characterization of 178 genomic BCR‐ABL1 fusion sites showed that 64% were located within sequence repeat elements, impeding optimal primer/probe design. Comparative quantification of DNA and RNA BCR‐ABL1 copy numbers in 687 specimens from 55 pediatric patients revealed that their levels were highly correlated. The combination of droplet digital PCR, double quenched probes and extended amplicons represents a valuable tool for sensitive MRD assessment in CML and may be adapted to other translocation‐positive tumours.

Overview of Molecular Testing of Cytology Specimens

OBJECTIVE

Utilizing cytology specimens for molecular testing has attracted increasing attention in the era of personalized medicine. Cytology specimens are clinically easier to access. The samples can be quickly and completely fixed in a very short time of fixation before tissue degradation occurs, compared to hours or days of fixation in surgical pathology specimens. In addition, cytology specimens can be fixed without formalin, which can significantly damage DNA and RNA. All these factors contribute to the superb quality of DNA and RNA in cytology specimens for molecular tests.

STUDY DESIGN

We summarize the most pertinent information in the literature regarding molecular testing in the field of cytopathology.

RESULTS

The first part focuses on the types of cytological specimens that can be used for molecular testing, including the advantages and limitations. The second section describes the common molecular tests and their clinical application.

CONCLUSION

Various types of cytology specimens are suitable for many molecular tests, which may require additional clinical laboratory validation.

Genomic BCR-ABL1 breakpoint characterization by a multi-strategy approach for "personalized monitoring" of residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia patients

For monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) the most recommended method is quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) for measuring BCR-ABL1 transcripts. Several studies reported that a DNA-based assay enhances the sensitivity of detection of the BCR-ABL1 genomic rearrangement, even if its characterization results difficult. We developed a DNA-based method for detecting and quantifying residual BCR-ABL1 positive leukemic stem cells in CML patients. We propose two alternative approaches: the first one is a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based step followed by Sanger sequencing; the second one employs MinION, a single molecule sequencer based on nanopore technology. Finally, after defining the BCR-ABL1 genomic junction, we performed the target CML patient–specific quantification, using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). FISH and MinION steps, respectively, together with ddPCR analysis, greatly reduce the complexity that has impeded the use of “personalized monitoring” of CML in clinical practice. Our report suggests a feasible pipeline, in terms of costs and reproducibility, aimed at characterizing and quantifying the genomic BCR-ABL1 rearrangement during MRD monitoring in CML patients.

New Methodologies in the Molecular Monitoring of CML

In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the BCR-ABL fusion gene is both the therapeutic target of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and the indisputable direct marker of disease burden. Thus, sensitive assays for BCR-ABL now drive therapeutic options and are good surrogates for short- and long-term outcomes. Because CML is such an ideal model, new methods are arising that should make testing in CML faster, more reliable, and reach a greater sensitivity. These methods should be able to be transferred to other hematological malignancies that have mutation markers.

Monitoring of childhood ALL using BCR-ABL1 genomic breakpoints identifies a subgroup with CML-like biology

We used the genomic breakpoint between BCR and ABL1 genes for the DNA-based monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) in 48 patients with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Comparing the results with standard MRD monitoring based on immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor (Ig/TCR) gene rearrangements and with quantification of IKZF1 deletion, we observed very good correlation for the methods in a majority of patients; however, >20% of children (25% [8/32] with minor and 12.5% [1/8] with major-BCR-ABL1 variants in the consecutive cohorts) had significantly (>1 log) higher levels of BCR-ABL1 fusion than Ig/TCR rearrangements and/or IKZF1 deletion. We performed cell sorting of the diagnostic material and assessed the frequency of BCR-ABL1-positive cells in various hematopoietic subpopulations; 12% to 83% of non-ALL B lymphocytes, T cells, and/or myeloid cells harbored the BCR-ABL1 fusion in patients with discrepant MRD results. The multilineage involvement of the BCR-ABL1-positive clone demonstrates that in some patients diagnosed with BCR-ABL1-positive ALL, a multipotent hematopoietic progenitor is affected by the BCR-ABL1 fusion. These patients have BCR-ABL1-positive clonal hematopoiesis resembling a chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)-like disease manifesting in "lymphoid blast crisis." The biological heterogeneity of BCR-ABL1-positive ALL may impact the patient outcomes and optimal treatment (early stem cell transplantation vs long-term administration of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors) as well as on MRD testing. Therefore, we recommend further investigations on CML-like BCR-ABL1-positive ALL.

Making the diagnosis, the tools, and risk stratification: More than just BCR-ABL

The implementation of cytogenetic and molecular techniques into standard clinical practice has improved our ability to more accurately diagnose and monitor CML. Routine peripheral blood BCR-ABL transcript testing can help monitor response, predict outcome, and detect early resistance or poor adherence to TKI therapy. The widely-used Sokal, Hasford and EUTOS clinical risk stratification scores were developed in patients receiving chemotherapy, interferon and imatinib, respectively; their predictive ability in patients receiving next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remains to be established. Newer more sensitive molecular techniques are being developed that may aid in the expanding emphasis on discontinuing therapy in patients with a deep and consistent molecular response.

Current developments in molecular monitoring in chronic myeloid leukemia

Molecular monitoring plays an essential role in the clinical management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, and now guides clinical decision making. Quantitative reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (qRT-PCR) assessment of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels has become the standard of care protocol in CML. However, further developments are required to assess leukemic burden more efficiently, monitor minimal residual disease (MRD), detect mutations that drive resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and identify predictors of response to TKI therapy. Cartridge-based BCR-ABL1 quantitation, digital PCR and next generation sequencing are examples of technologies which are currently being explored, evaluated and translated into the clinic. Here we review the emerging molecular methods/technologies currently being developed to advance molecular monitoring in CML.

Molecular monitoring of chronic myeloid leukemia: present and future

INTRODUCTION

Fusion of BCR-ABL1 genes causes chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). As a reliable marker of disease burden, it also serves as the target of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). New more sensitive molecular diagnostic tools for BCR-ABL1 can contribute to therapeutic decision-making, especially in considering drug discontinuation for patients enjoying prolonged deep molecular response. Areas covered: Several novel platforms are transforming CML molecular diagnostics to enable faster point-of-care devices, better understanding of clonal diversity and resistance mutations. Here, we review these molecular platforms, knowing implementation in other hematological malignancies will ensue. Expert commentary: Treatment with TKI in CML is the first example of a highly effective targeted therapy. Monitoring of BCR-ABL1 mRNA is standard in assessing disease burden being highly predictive of outcomes recommended by both European LeukemiaNet (ELN) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN); however, studies has demonstrated poor adherence to these recommendations. In both clinical practice and assay performance, further optimizing of BCR-ABL1 monitoring can be envisioned including point-of-care methods for increased availability of rapid, standardized testing and increasingly sensitive molecular assays that allow for quantification of MRD and detecting resistance mutations.

Present and future of molecular monitoring in chronic myeloid leukaemia

Currently, physicians treating chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients can rely on a wide spectrum of therapeutic options: the best use of such options is essential to achieve excellent clinical outcomes and, possibly, treatment-free remission (TFR). To accomplish this, proper integration of expert clinical and laboratory monitoring of CML patients is fundamental. Molecular response (MR) monitoring of patients at defined time points has emerged as an important success factor for optimal disease management and BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutation screening is useful to guide therapeutic reassessment in patients who do not achieve optimal responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Deeper MRs might be associated with improved long-term survival outcomes. More importantly, they are considered a gateway to TFR. In molecular biology, novel procedures and technologies are continually being developed. More sophisticated molecular tools and automated analytical solutions are emerging as CML treatment endpoints and expectations become more and more ambitious. Here we provide a critical overview of current and novel methodologies, present their strengths and pitfalls and discuss what their present and future role might be.

Next-Generation Sequencing-Assisted DNA-Based Digital PCR for a Personalized Approach to the Detection and Quantification of Residual Disease in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients

Recent studies indicate that 40% of chronic myeloid leukemia patients who achieve sustained undetectable BCR-ABL1 transcripts on tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy remain disease-free after drug discontinuation. In contrast, 60% experience return of detectable disease and have to restart treatment, thus highlighting the need for an improved method of identifying patients with the lowest likelihood of relapse. Here we describe the validation of a personalized DNA-based digital PCR (dPCR) approach for quantifying very low levels of residual disease, which involves the rapid identification of t(9;22) fusion junctions using targeted next-generation sequencing coupled with the use of a dPCR platform. t(9;22) genomic breakpoints were successfully mapped in samples from 32 of 32 patients with early stage disease. Disease quantification by DNA-based dPCR was performed using the Fluidigm BioMark platform on 46 follow-up samples from 6 of the 32 patients, including 36 samples that were in deep molecular remission. dPCR detected persistent disease in 81% of molecular-remission samples, outperforming both RT-dPCR (25%) and DNA-based quantitative PCR (19%). We conclude that dPCR for BCR-ABL1 DNA is the most sensitive available method of residual-disease detection in chronic myeloid leukemia and may prove useful in the management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor withdrawal.

BCR-ABL1 expression, RT-qPCR and treatment decisions in chronic myeloid leukaemia

AIMS

RT-qPCR is used to quantify minimal residual disease (MRD) in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in order to make decisions on treatment, but its results depend on the level of BCR-ABL1 expression as well as leukaemic cell number. The aims of the study were to quantify inter-individual differences in expression level, to determine the relationship between expression level and response to treatment, and to investigate the effect of expression level on interpretation of the RT-qPCR result.

METHODS

BCR-ABL1 expression was studied in 248 samples from 65 patients with CML by determining the difference between MRD quantified by RT-qPCR and DNA-qPCR. The results were analysed statistically and by simple indicative modelling.

RESULTS

Inter-individual levels of expression approximated a normal distribution with an SD of 0.36 log. Expression at diagnosis correlated with expression during treatment. Response to treatment, as measured by the number of leukaemic cells after 3, 6 or 12 months of treatment, was not related to the level of expression. Indicative modelling suggested that interpretation of RT-qPCR results in relation to treatment guidelines could be affected by variation in expression when MRD was around 10% at 3 months and by both expression variation and Poisson variation when MRD was around or below the limit of detection of RT-qPCR.

CONCLUSIONS

Variation between individuals in expression of BCR-ABL1 can materially affect interpretation of the RT-qPCR when this test is used to make decisions on treatment.